Board of Supervisors of the County of Sant-a Barbara, State of California, September. 14, 1970, at 9:30 o'clock, a.m Present: Supervisors George H. Clyde, Joe J. Callahan, Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell; and J. E. Lewis, Clerk. Supervisor Clyde in the Chair . In the Matter of Approval of Minutes of August 31, 1970 Meeting. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie seconded by Supervisor, Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the reading of the minutes of the August 31, 1970 meeting be dispensed with, and the minutes approved, .as submitted. In the Matter of Fixing and Determining Fees to be Charged for Agricultural Preserves and Under Ordinances Nos. 453, 538 and 661, and Chapter 21 and Article I of Chapter 35 of Santa Barbara County Code. (Reducing Fee Charge for Conditional Use Permits for Small Child Day Care Schools from $75 to $25.) Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO. 70-570 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Appeal of Dr. Eugene Aiches from Conditions Imposed on Planning Commission Approval of Development Plan (70-M-88) for Office Buildings, Goleta. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that Monday, September 28, 1970, at 2 o'clock, p.m. be, and the same is hereby, set as the date and time for a public hearing on the appeal of Dr. Eugene Aiches from three conditions imposed on Planning Commission approval of Development Plan (70-M-88) for office Buildings, Goleta, which conditions pertaining to whether or not Patterson Avenue should be widened from a two-lane to a four-lane road at the expense of the development, and that notice be given by publ ication in the Santa Barbara New-Press, a newspaper of general circulation, as follows, to-wit: NOT-IC-E NOTICE is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California on Monday, September 28, 1970, at 2 o'clock, P.M., in the Board of Supervisors Hearing Room, Fourth Floor, County Administration Building, City of Santa Barbara, State of California, on the appeal of Dr. . Eugene Aiches from three conditions imposed on Planning Commission approval of Development Plan {70-M-88) for office Buildings, Goleta, which conditions pertain to whether or not Patterson Avenue should be widened from a two-lane to a four-lane road at the expense of the development 1 2 Aopeal of Ernest Haec I el . ' ~ . September 14, 1970 WITNESS my hand and seal this 14th day of September, 1970 ~/ J. E. LEWIS, (SEAL) J. E. LEw!s, County Clerk and Ex-officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors In the Matter of Appeals of Ernest Haeckel from Planning Commission Denial of Requests for Ordinance Amending Article IV if Ordinance No. 661 to Rezone Property (Rancho San Jose) , Goleta area from ''U'' to WA-T District for Trailer Park (70-RZ-3); and Conditional Exception Permitting 10 instead of 20 Sites Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that Monday, October 26,1970, at 2 o'clock, p.m. be, and the same is hereby, set as the date and time for hearings on the appeals of Ernest Haeckel (70-RZ-38) from Planning Conmission denial of requests, as follows: 1) To initiate an ordinance amending Article IV of Ordinance No. 661 of the County pf Santa Barbara, as amended, rezoning property described as Assessor's Parcel No. 153-160-26, generally located on the west side of San Marcos Pass Road approximately 1/4 mile northerly from the intersection of Old San Marcos Pass Road, Goleta Valley from the 11U11 , Unlimited Agricultural District (permits residential and agricultural uses on 10- acre building sites) to the WA-T, Watershed Agricultural District with the Trailer Park Zone Combining Regulations (permits residential and agricultural uses on one-acre building sites and a trailer park subject to issuance of a Conditional Use Permit) of said ordinance; and 2) A Conditional Exception under Article X, Section 4 and the provisions of Ordinance No. 661 of the County of Santa Barbara, as amended, to permit ten (10) trailer sites instead of the required twenty (20) Sites. It is further ordered that notice be given by publication in the Sata. Barbara News-Press, a newspaper of general circulation, as follows, to-wit: NOTICE NOTICE is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California on Monday, October 26, 1970, at 2 o'clock, p .m., in the Board of Supervisors Hearing Room, Fourth Floor, County Administration Building, City of Santa Barbara, State of California on the appeal of Ernest Haeckel (70-RZ-38) from Planning Commission denial of requests, as follows: 1) To initiate an ordinance amending Article IV of Ordinance No. 661 of the County of Santa Barbara, as amended, rezoning property described as Assessor's Parcel No. 153-160-26, generally located on the west side of San Marcos Pass Road approximately 1/4 mile northerly from the intersection of Old San Marcos Pass Road, Goleta Valley from the ''U'', Unlimited Agricultural District (permits residential and agricultural uses on 10-acre building sites) to the WA-T, Watershed Agricultural District with the Trailer Park Appeal of Walte r F . ~chwank on req of J . Robert Andrews for Speci ';are Home for t' en tally Retarded Women I September 14, 1970 Zone Combining Regulations (permits residential and agricultural uses on one-acre building sites and a trailer park subject to issuance of a Conditional Use Permit) of said ordinanc~; and 2) A conditional Exception under Article X, Section 4 and the provisions of .Ordinance No. 661 of the County of Santa Barbara, as amended, to permit ten (10) trailer sites: instead of the required twenty (20) Sites. WITNESS my hand and seal this 14th day of September, 1970 J. E. LEWIS, County Clerk and Ex-officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors It is further ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the Planning Commission for submission of a report on t he hearing date. In the Matter- of Appeal of Walter F. Schwank from Planning Commission Approval of Request of J. Robert Andrews on Behalf of G. Schuirman ~Associates 1 (70-CP-48) for a Conditional Use Permit to Allow Special Care Home for 6 Mildly Mentally Retarded Women and Recommendation for Conditional Exception to Allow 8 Persons to Reside therein instead of Permitted 5. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that Monday, October 5,1970, at 2 o'clock, p .m. be, and the same is hereby, set as the date and time for a hearing on the appeal of Walter F. Schwank from Planning Commission approval of request of J. Robert Andrews on behalf of G. Schuirman ~ Associates (70-CP-48) for a Conditional Use Permit under the provisions of Article XI, Section 4 and the 20 -R-1 District Classification of Ordinance No. 661 to allow a Special Care Home for six mildly mentally retarded women, and recommendation for approval of Conditional Exception under the provisions of Article X, Section 4 and the 20-R-l District Classification of Ordinance No. 661 to allow eight (8) persons to reside in this Special Care Home instead of the permitted five (5) on property located on the south side of Foothill Road, approximately 150 feet easterly of Mission Canyon Road and known as 840 Mission Canyon Road, Mission Canyon area, and that notice be given by publication in the Santa Barbara News-Press, a newspaper of general circulation, as follows, to-wit: 3 4 Ernst & Ern t Agreem' t September 14, 1970 NOTICE NOTICE is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, State of Cal ifornia on Monday, October 5, 1970, at 2 o'clock, p .m. , in the Board of Supervisors Hearing Room, Fourth Floor, County Administration Building, City of Santa Barbara, State of California, on the appeal of Walter F. Schwank from Planni ng Commission approval of request of J. Robert Andrews on behalf of G. Schuirman & Associates (70- CP-48) for a Conditional Use Permit under the provisions of Article XI, Section 4 and the 20- R- l District Classification of Ordinance No . 661 to allow a Special Care Home for six mildly mentally retarded women, and recommendation for approval of Conditional Exception under the provisions of Article X, Section 4 and the 20-R-l District Classification of Ordinance No. 661 to allow eight (8) persons to reside in this Special Care Home instead of the permitted five (5) on property located on the south side of Foothill Road, approximately 150 feet easterly of Mission Canyon Road and known as 840 Mission Canyon Road, Mission Canyon area. WITNESS my hand and seal this 14th day of September, 1970 . s/ J . E, LEWIS (SW.) J . E. LEWIS, County Clerk and Ex-officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors i s Itf further ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the Planning Commission for submission of a report on the hearing date . 1969- 70 Med - Ernst Care , Medi - al In the Matter of Execution of Agreement between the County & Ernst & to Prepare 1969-70 Medi-Care, Medi-Cal & Option Cost Reimbursement Report. & Option Co t Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie seconded by Supervisor Grant, and Reimburseme t Report carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted authorizing I Los Alamos Road, Parki Lots & Grad Plans & Spe I the execution of subject agreement: ark g ng Lots, s ' RESOLUIION NO . 70- 571 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT Fll.E) In the Matter of Approval of Plans & Specifications for Road, Parking & Grading.; ,Los Alamos Park, Santa Barbara County, California. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that plans and specifications for ''Road, Parking Lots, & Grading, Los Alamos Park, Santa Barbara County, California'' be, and the same are hereby, approved. It is further ordered that Thursday, October 8, 1970, at 3 o'clock, p.m. be, and the same is hereby, set as the date a.nd time for the opening of bids on subject proposal in the County Clerk's Office, County Office Building, Santa Maria, California, and that notice be given by publication in the Santa Maria Times, a newspaper of general circulation, as follows, to-wit: bids for - September 14, 1970 NOTICE NOTICE is hereby given that the County of Santa Barbara will receive ''Road, Parking Lots, and Grading~ Los Alamos Park, Santa Barbara County, California' Each bid will be in accordance with dr~wings and specifications approved by the Board of Supervisors and on file in the OFFICE OF THE DEPART.-. MENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, COUNTY ENGINEERING BUil.DING, 123 EAST ANAPAMU STREET, SANTA BARBARA, CALIFORNIA, WHERE THEY MAY BE EXAMINED AND COPIES SECURED BY PROSPECTIVE BIDDERS. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California (Amended by Statutes 1968, Chapter 699, Paragraph 1, operative July 1, 1969) the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara has directed the publishing of the prevailing rate of wages with a copy of the same being onfile at the office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. EACH BID SHALL BE MADE OUT ON A FORM TO BE OBTAINED AT THE OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS; shall be accompanied by a certified or cashier's check or bid bond for ten (10) percent of the amount of the bid, made payable to the order of the Treasurer of Santa Barbara County, Santa Barbara, California; shall be sealed and received in the Office of the County Clerk of Santa Barbara County, Office Building, 312 East Cook Street, Santa Maria, California, 93454, on or before 3:00 P.M. on the 8th day of October, 1970, and will be opened and publicly read aloud at 3:00 P.M. of that day in the County Clerk's office listed . . . , above. The above mentioned check or bond shall be given as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the contract if awarded to him and will be declared forfeited if the successful bidder refuses to enter into said contract after being requested so to do by the Board of Supervisors of said County. The Board of Supervisors of Santa Barbara County reserves the right to reject any or all bids or waive any informality in a bid. No bidder may withdraw his bid for a period of thirty (30) days after the date set for the opening thereof. Dated: September 14, 1970 J. E. LEWIS, County Clerk and Ex-officio Clerk of the ' Board of Supervisors Lompoc Hospital In the Matter of Appointment of George H. Schuknecht, John J. Hannah District Boa rd Appt of 3 Directo s and Donald G. Cameron to Lompoc Hospital District Board of Directors in Lieu of I Election. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted on the appointment of members to the District Board: RESOLlITION NO. 70-572 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) 5 6 September 14, 1970 Declaration of Results Sep B S Co Empl ees Retirem Boar d Elect 1 y- Barbara In the Matter of Declaration of Results of September 1, 1970 Santa County Employees Retirement Board Election. (William H. Cook & Merlin L. nt on McCune) Apptm"3nt to Medical Sta f S B Gen11 Hosp I Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, the following Order was passed and adopted: -OBPEB WHEREAS, by Minute Order duly passed and adopted by this Board on August 3, 1970, the Board ordered an election for the election of employee members designated as Position N11mber 2 and Alternate Safety Member to fill unexpired terms ending December 31, 1971 on the Board of Retirement of the Santa Barbara County Employees Retirement Association, to be held September 1, 1970; and WHEREAS, J. E. LEWIS, County Clerk, duly conducted said election in accordance with said Minute Order; and WHEREAS, nomination papers were duly and regularly filed for Position Number 2 by Albert Anolick and William H. Cook, and for Alternate Safety Member by Merlin L. McCune; and WHEREAS, J. E. LEWIS, County Clerk, has certified to this Board that the following persons received the number of votes shown after his name, as follows, to-wit: William H. Cook . 225 Albert Anolick 90 Don Combs 1 Esther V. Dowd .1 and that an unanimous ballot was cast for Alternate Safety Member candidate, Merlin L. McCune. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that William H. Cook and Merlin L. McCune be, and they are hereby declared elected regular and alternate safety employee members respectively of the Board of Retirement of the Santa Barbara County Employees Retirement Association to fill unexpired terms ending December 31, 1971, and designated as the second member and alternate safety member respectively of said Board. The foregoing Order entered in the Minutes of the Board of Supervisors this 14th day of September, 1970. In the Matter of Approving Application for Appointment to Medical Staff as Requested"by Santa Barbara General Hospital Medical Director. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the request of the Santa Barbara General Hospital Medical Direcror to approve the following application for appointment to the Medical Staff be, and the same is hereby, approved: Dr. Walter H. Gerwig, M. D. i Release of Co claims for damage Re]else of Co claims for damages I September 14, 1970 In the Matter of Execution of Release of All County Claims for Damages to County Property Resulting from Vehicular Accident, in the Amount of $55.00. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carr ied unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman and Clerk be, and they ar e hereby, authorized and directed to execute a Release of all County claims for damages to County property resulting from a vehicular accident, as follows: Jesus Tereso Martinez, accident on August 1, 1970, damages in the amount of $55.00. It is further ordered that the Director, of the Department of Resources Collections be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to deposit the draft received in full settlement therefor to the Road Fund. In the Matter of Releasing the Director, of the Department of Resources Collections from Further Accountability for Collection of Certain Delinquent Accounts. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, this Board hereby determines that the following amounts are too small to justify the cost of collection, or that the collection of such amounts is improbable for the reasons set forth in the verified applications of the Director, of the Department of Resources ~Collections, and it is ordered that the Director be, and he is hereby, discharged from further accountability for the collection of the following amounts, in accordance with Section 25257 of the Welfare ~ Institutions Code: Name Alverez Margaret Alvarez Raymond Ar echiga Maria M. Bouthwell Robert Brown Mary E. Cano Manuel Chavez Sally Comsolver Richard Cota Mary M. DeLitt Ronald DeOrman Patricia A. Fitzgerald R. L. Gamboa Luis Garcia Armando B. Grrison Norvin Hamlet Robert ~ Reina Hampton James Hedrick John E. Hernandez Felipe Hicks Dianne Isaac Jerry Lar iba Atilano Lewis Albert Lowman Fyrne Lozano Pedro Maglish Robert Mancillas Rita Mendez Jose Miller Archie for Vonnie Young Moreno Etna Morin Joe Nunez Geraldine Odenthal Kaye Pinheiro Robert Realin Dora Rodriguez Antonio Rollins Margaret Rule Orville Salinas Carlos Sanidad Nemecio Showe John Smith Dorance Soape Billy for Bonnie Mack Soto Faustino Spangenberg Richard Spurlock Shirley Sweeney Ruby Tarporco Barbara Teniente Henrietta Thompson Thomas Todd Judy Valdivezo Faustino Villegas Ramon Date 10/10/69 5/24/69 10/18/69 11/24/69 10/1/69 9/20/69 9/1/69 11/15/69 11/21/62 7/14/67 4/26/69 10/20/69 12/3/65 12/31/65 10/10/66 7/24/69 7/28/66 10/20/66 2/7/70 10/8/66 11/4/69 7/14/69 10/22/69 10/7/66 7/1/66 5/2/66 11/3/69 1/18/66 12/31/69 2/27/65 8/24/70 9/15/69 7/22/69 6/13/69 10/1/69 1/9/67 8/31/69 6/25/66 1/14/70 3/24/69 4/26/66 12/18/69 2/3/70 11/18/69 10/13/67 8/7/64 4/7/66 6/19/69 8/12/69 10/20/69 3/19/70 1/30/69 8/8/69 7/6/69 7/15/69 Reason Too small to pursue, moved. Too small to pursue, moved. Too small to pursue Too small to pursue Too small to pursue Too small to pursue Too small to pursue Too small to pursue Receives Welfare assistance Too small to pursue further. Too small to pursue, moved. Passed statute Passed statute Bankruptcy claim was filed. Too small to pursue Unable to locate Request for Dismissal by County Counsel Too small to pursue Unable to locate Too small to pursue Unable to locate Too small to pursue, moved Banktrupcy claim was filed. Unable to locate Unable to locate Too small to pursue Unable to locate Too small to pursue Too small to pursue Too small to pursue Too small to pursue Too small to pursue Too small to pursue Unable to locate Too small to pursue Unable to locate Too small to pursue Receives welfare assistance Unable to locate Too small to pursue Too small to pursue Too small to pursue Unable to locate Passed statute Unable to locate Too small to pursue Receives welfare assist. Too small to pursue Too small to pursue Too small to pursue Left State Too small to pursue Too small to pursue Amount 6.00 11.15 4.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 6.00 150.70 11.00 10.20 85.05 170.10 180.00 4.50 89.82 386.08 s.oo 118.16 2.65 8.00 8.00 99.76 31.20 31.70 6.00 68.35 6.00 .24 7.35 6.00 10.50 10.00 26.05 6.85 24.00 10.00 8.00 28.35 1.90 1.75 4.00 83.04 239.00 240.00 11.50 16.00 14.80 5.65 11.10 7.00 13.00 10.00 7 8 Draft for $3 , 053 . 30 f r Co Services for Hospita Claim Atty Ja.m.e.s Name - Wallace Joan Weaver Silas Wilder Robert Williams James Clairborne Effie M. Collins Mary Ann Eddy George Lee Elliot Agnes Lay Catherine Roy Navarro Alejo. Sais Frank Wolson Richard Date 2/12/70 2/11/70 10/7/69 12/17/69 5/25/65 9/13/67 11/18/57 5/1/65 7/14/64 12/21/64 3/23/68 12/18/68 . - September 14, 1970 Reason Too small to pursue Too small to pursue Too small to pursue Too small to pursue On OAS On OAS Account over statute, Amount 5.00 9.40 10.00 8.00 116.20 -79.07 Co. Council unable to reactivate. 2278.18 No money, no assets, past statute No assets, past statute Deceased, no assets Deceased, no estate Deceased 7461.33 3151.18 640.60 2721.15 28.69 $18,823.30 In the Matter of Acceptance of Draft in the Amount of $3,053.30 for Collection Services of County Claim for Hospital Services Rendered. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried 1 Longtin is under Contr I unanimously, it is ordered that the request of the Director, Department of Resources ct .A tlanticRichf ie ld Corner of U. S . Hwy 101 & Padar Lane Annex I Collections to accept a draft in the amount of $3,953.30 from Home Insurance Company representing payment in full for services rendered in the collection of account for hospital services rendered. It is further ordered that the sum of $2,635.53 be deposited to the County General Fund, and the County Auditor be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to draw a warrant, in the amount of $1,317.77,in favor of Attorney James A. Longtin of Lompoc as his collection fee, in accordance with the order of the Board dated August 11, 1969, which authorized County Counsel to permit Attorney Longtin to handle the collection case for the County on a contingency basis. In the Matter of Resolution Annexing Territory to County Service Area No. 11, Carpinteria Valley, Northeast Corner of U. S. Highway 101 Padaro Lane. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO. 70-573 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT Fll.E) Tract 10 , 95 , In the Matter of Copy of Statement of Change in Boundaries of Goleta Valley Unit 2 Chan e of Bdrys Mosquito Abatement District for Tract #10,955, Unit #2. Goleta Vall y Mosquito Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried Abatement Di strict unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to / the County Assessor and State Board of Equalization. It is further ordered that the certified copy of District Resolution #118 ordering annexation to the District be, and the same is hereby, placed on file. In the Matter of Copy of Statement of Change in Boundaries of Goleta Sanitary District, Tract #10,933 (Elliott-Rich), Annexation #154. I Tract 10, 93 Elliott- Ric Annex #154 Change Bdry Goleta Sani District ary Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried I Easement De d unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to _ the County Assessor and State Board of Equalization. It is further ordered that the certified copy of District Resolution ordering annexation to the District be, and the same is hereby, placed on file. In the Matter of Execution of Easement Deed Conveyed by the County to Isla Isla Vista Vista Sanitary District on Donation Basis for Construction Maintenance of Sanitary Sanitary / District Sewer, Third District, Audubon Corp., Parcel 2.1, Folio #571. Audubon Cor Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute an Easement Deed, dated September 14, 1970, conveying property to the Isla Vista Sanitary District for construction and maintenance of a sanitary sewer, Third District, Audubon Corp., Parcel No. 2.1, Folio #571, on a don- R/W Gran~ for Albert Eaves , Jr . atricia Banks , & valinn Scott I September 14, 1970 ation basis, said document to be returned to Real Property Division to hold until the District delivers an executed Quitclaim Deed to the County on the portion of easement no longer required for sanitary sewers. In the Matter of Acceptance of Right of Way Grant Conveyed on Donation Basis from Albert T. Eaves, Jr., Patricia E. Banks, and Evalinn E. Scott for Elwood Acres No. 2 Project, Parcel 16.1, Folio #546, First District. Upon motion of Supervisor Bea~tie seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Right of Way Grant, dated August 29, 1970 conveyed to the County on a donation basis by Albert E. Eaves, Jr., a married man, Patricia E. Banks, a married. woman, and Evalinn E. Scott, a married women, each individually as their sole and separate property, and all as Joint Tenants be, and the same is hereby, accepted for Elwood Acres No. 2 Project, Parcel 16.1, Folio #546; and the Clerk be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to record said document in the office of the Santa Barbara County Recorder and return to the Real Property Division. Easement Deed Cit In the Matter of Acceptance of Ease~ent Deed from the City of Carpinteria of Carpinteria / Conveyed on Donation Basis for Flood Control Purposes, Carpinteria Creek, Parcel 7.1, Folio #239, First District. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Easement Deed, dated August 25, 1970 conveyed on a donation basis to the County by Allan R. Coates, Jr., Mayor, and Arthur c. Simonian, Acting City Clerk, on behalf of the City of Carpinteria be, and the same is hereby, accepted, for flood control purposes, Carpinteria Creek, Parcel 7.1, Folio #239, First District. It is further ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the Santa Barbara County Flood Control & Water Conservation District for acceptance prior to recordation by the Clerk in the office of the Santa Barbara County Recorder for return to the Real Property Division. Meeker Developme In the Matter of Approval .of Request of Meeker Development Company for o Tract 10, 699 , nit 3 LAFCO Authorization to Proceed without Notice and Hearing before LAFCO on 100% Consent 100~ Consent Petition To Co Petition for Annexation of Tract #10,699, Unit #3 to County Service Area No. 3, Service Area No . I Goleta Valley. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the request of the Meeker Development Company for authorization of the Local Agency Formation Commission to proceed without notice and hearing on the 100% consent petition for annexation of Tract #10,999, Unit #3 to County Service Area No. 3, Goleta Valley be, and the same is hereby, approved; and further waiving the right to demand a public .hearing on said matter. It is f urther or dered that subject mat t er le, and the same is hereby, Physical Waivers / referred to the Local Agency Formation Commission for further action. In the Matter of. Approval of Requests for Physical Waivers of Physical Standards for Prospective Employees Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the following requests for physical waivers 9 10 September 14, 1970 of physical standards for pro~pective employees be, and the same are hereby, approved: Parks Department - Raleigh Monroy, . Grounds Maintenance Man in Open Space Division Planning Department - Mrs. Ruth E. Bond, Intermediate Typist Clerk. Health Department - Shirley Licker, Intermediate Typist-Clerk Easement De d In the Matter of Acceptance of Easement Deed from.Ellen A. Bertoliatti Ellen A. Bertoliatti Mission ,.,re Conveyed on Donation Basis for Flood Control Purposes, Mission Creek, Parcel 20.1, k / . s Folio #354, Second Supervisorial District. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Easement Deed, dated August 26, 1970, from Ellen A. Bertoliatti be, and the same is hereby, accepted by the County on a donation basis for flood control purposes, Mission Creek, Parcel 20.1, Folio #354, Second Supervisorial District. It is further ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the s. B. County Flood Control & Water Conservation District for acceptance prior to recordation and return to the Real Property Division. Change Or d In the Matt~r of Authorizing Chairman to Execute Change Orders to Contract Box Culver San Pedro La~ith Santa Barbara Crane Service for Concrete Box Culvert Extensions on San Pedro & Las Vegas Cree s / Vegas Creeks, Project #3004.1. R/W Grants donation for Rd Purposes / R. /W Contra Ethel Proctor Elwood Acr No . 2 I Upon motion of Supervisor ~eattie seconded by Supervisor. Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to execute the following Change Orders to contract with Santa Barbara Crane Service for concrete box culvert extensions on San Pedro ~Las Vegas Creeks, Project #3004.1: N11m.ber 1, increase of $196.80. Number 2, increase of $373.00. Number 3, increase of $1,051.07. In the Matter of Acceptance of Right of Way Grants Conveyed on Donation Basis for Road Purposes. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the following Right of Way Grants conveyed on donation basis for road purposes be, and the same are hereby, accepted; and the Clerk be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to record said documents in the office of the Santa Barbara County Recorder: / Don s. Connor, dated September 4, 1970, for Pasado Road, Third District /'Henry L. Day, dated August 24, 1970, for Hot Springs Road, First District In the Matter of Execution of Right of Way Contract between the County and Ethel Proctor for Elwood Acres No. 2 Job No. 3049.1, Third District and Acceptance of Grant Deed Conveyed on Donation Basis for Construction of Phelps Road. September 14, 1970 Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute a Right of Way Contract, dated August 31, 1970, between the County of Santa Barbara and Ethel Proctor, for Elwood Acres No . 2 J ob No . 3049.1, Third District. It is f urther ordered that the Grant Deed, dated August 31, 1970, conveyed by Ethel Proctor on a donation basis for construction of Phelps Road in connection with subject project be, and the same is hereby, accepted; and the Clerk be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to record said document in the office of the Santa Barbara County Recorder . It is further ordered that the County Auditor be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to draw a warrant, in the amount of $7,091 . 39, made payable to Ethel Proctor, from Road Fund 140 B 24, as payment for the land secured R/W Contract In the Matter of Execution of Right of Way Contract between the County r;unter Wolf et x Cathedral Qqks and Gunter E. Wolf and Ann L. Wolf for Cathedral Oaks Road Job No. 398.1, Lot Split Rd / Pacific Southwest Realty Co dr aft $5, 904 .40 improvement to Calle Real / 10946, and Acceptance of Grant Deed, Third District. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie seconded by Supervisor Grant, and . carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute a Right of Way Contract, between the County of Santa Barbara and Gunter E. Wolf and Ann L. Wolf for construction of Cathedral Oaks Road, Job No . 398. 1, Lot Split 10946, Third District, which provides for payment of $20,000 for the 2.46 acres of property or interest therein as conveyed by Document No . 19646-1 within 6P days after date title to said property vests in the County free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, assessments, easements and leases with exceptions. . It is further ordered that the Grant Deed, dated August 28, 1970, from Gunter E. Wolf and Ann L. Wolf, Escrow Number 163852-LC, Document Number 1946- 1, Job No . 398. 1 LS be, and the same is hereby, accepted, and a Certificate of Acceptance be transmitted to the Security Title Insurance Company for attachment to the original document being held in Escrow No. 163852-LC; and that the Security Title Insurance Company be, and it is hereby, authorized and directed to record the original Grant Deed being held in escrow. In 'the Matter of Reconnnendation of Road Commissioner for Acceptance of Draft from Pacific Southwest Realty Company in the Amount of $5,904.40 as Participation in Road Improvements to Calle Real adjacent to Security Pacific National Bank Job No. 3004.1, Third District. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the draft received from Pacific Southwest Realty Company, in the amount of $5,904.40 as participation in road improvements to Calle Real adjacent to Security Pacific National Bank, in connection with the County's improvement project on Calle Real and Fairview Avenue, Job No. 3004.1 be, and the same is hereby, accepted as reconnnended by the Road Commissioner; for deposit with the Auditor to the Road Fund. 11 12 Santa Barba a City draft n amt $900. a participati n repair to Nicholas La e September 14, 1970 In the Matter of Recommendation of Road Commissioner for Acceptance of Draft from the City of Santa Barbara in the Amount of $900. 00 as Participation for Repairs to Nicholas Lane in Connection with Sewer Installation in Surrounding Area. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the draft received from the City of Santa Barbara in the amount of $900. 00 as participation for repairs to Nicholas Lane in connection with the sewer installation in the surrounding area performed by the City of Santa Barbara be, and the same is hereby, accepted, as recommended by the Road Commissioner; and the Clerk be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to deposit said draft with the Auditor to the Road Fund Tract 10,40 In the Matter of Releasing 85% of Road Improvement Bond and Dedication of Unit 1 rele s - in~ 85% Roa Streets for Tract #10,407, Unit #1. IMprove~ent Bond / Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie seconded by Supervisor Grant, and Tract 10,40 Unit 2 releasing 85% Road Improvement Bond I Claims Against the County / carried unanimously, it is ordered that 85% of the following road improvement bond for Tract #10,407, #1 be released, or if a separate bond in the amount of 15% of the road improvement bond is posted, all of the original bond may be exonerated,as provided in Ordinance No . 1358; and that the dedicated streets in the subdivision be, and the same are hereby, accepted, as recommended by the Road Commissioner: United Pacific Insurance Company, as Surety - Mark J . Smith and Dorothy W. Smith, as Principals, for Bond No. B- 568864, dated September 23, 1968, in the original amount of $7,600. 00 . In the Matter of Releasing 85% of Road Improvement Bond and Dedication of Streets for Tract #10,407 , Unit #2 . Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that 85% of the following road improvement bond for Tract# 10,407, #2 be released, or if a separate bond in the amount of 15% of the road improvement bond is posted, all of the original bond may be exonerated, as provided in Ordinance No . 1358; and that the dedicated streets in the subdivision be, and the same are hereby, accepted, as recommended by the Road Commissioner: United Pacific Insurance Company, Surety - Mark J . Smith and Dorothy W. Smith, as Principals, for Bond No . B-569422, dated November 5, 1968, in the original amount of $38,000. 00. In the Matter of Clajms Against the County Filed by Individuals and/or Attorneys on Behalf of Clients for Alleged Damages . Upon motion of Supervis~r Beattie seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the following claims against the County filed by inqividuals and/or attorneys on behalf of clients for alleged damages be, and the same are hereby, referred to the County Counsel and insurance carrier. / Willard Brown, $99, truck tire damage at County dump . / Charles M. Dazey, $20,000, personal injury. Attorney J ohn Sink for Richard Paul Underwood, $50 ,000 , personal / inj ury September 14, 1970 ~ Alan James Kruthers, $300 , false arrest . 1 John E. Hernandez, $5,500, personal injury. / Attorney Jerry D. Whatley on behalf of Susan Elizabeth Jackson, $101,650, personal injury / Attorney Jerry D. Whatley on behalf of Kathleen M. Powell, $100,325, personal injury. ! Attorney Burton J. Twitchell on behalf of A. J. Phillips, $67, unlawful eviction, welfare recipient. ;Farmers Insurance Group & Allen J. Meeks, $574.79, property damage. ; General Telephone Company, $851.01, damage to Company's underground facilities on Hollister Avenue, south side at Pine Avenue. (Also refer to Road Commissioner). Tract 10, 699 , Uni In the Matter of Fixing Tax Bonds for Tract #10,699, Unit #3, for $6,120, 3 settin~ Tax / Bond and Tract #25,011, for $1,202.80. Atlantic- Richfiel lands'ape Bond $1500. j Tract 10, 373 re lease of Tree Plantin ~ Bond I Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that tax bonds be, and they are hereby, fixed, as follows: ~Tract #10,699, Unit #3, in the amount of $6,120. Jiract #25,011 in City of Carpinteria, in the amount of $1,202.80. In the Matte~ of Recommendation of County Landscape Architect that Bond be Posted for $1,500 for Planting, Masonry Wall ic Sprinkler System for AtlanticRichfield Development, Carpinteria (69-RZ-49) and Cash Deposit of $75 for Main- tenance of Street Trees. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the recommendation of the County Landscape Architect that a bond be deposited, in the amount of $1,500 to insure planting, masonry wall and sprinkler system for Atlantic-Richfield development, Carpinteria (69-RZ-49) and deposit of cash in the amount of $75 for maintenance of street trees be, and the same is hereby, confirmed. The bond should contain working similar to the following: ''In consideration of approval by the County Planning Commission of a Precise Plan of Development (68-M-39) for a service station at u. S. Highway 101 and Padaro Lane, being a portion of Assessor's Parcel No. 5-430-36, the Atlantic-Richfield Company hereby agrees to install landscaping, masonry wall and sprinkler system within one year from the date of issuance of the building permit for this facility, and in accordance with the landscape plan dated August 31, 1970, on file with the County Landscape Architect.'' In the Matter of Reconmendation of County Landscape Architect for Release of Street Tree Planting Bond on Tract #10,373. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the reconmendation of the County Landscape Architect for release of street tree planting bond for Tract #10,373, now located 13 14 PUBLICATION Ordinances 2107, 2108 2109 & 2111 I Reports & Communicati s / Planning Conmission Reports I September 14, 1970 within the City Limits of Carpinteria, in the amount of $265.50 be, and the same is hereby, confirmed. In the Matter of Publication of Ordinances Nos. 2107, 2108, 2109 and 2111. It appearing from the Affidavits of the Principal Clerks of the Santa Barbara News-Press and Goleta Valley Sun that Ordinance Nos. 2107, 2108, 2109 and 2111 have been duly published in the manner and form prescribed by law; Upon motion, duly seconded, and carried unanimously, it is determined . that Ordinances Nos. 2107, 2108, 2109 and 2111 have been duly published in the manner and form prescribed by law In the Matter of Reports and Communications. The following reports and communications were received by the Board and ordered placed on file: / State Dept. of Navigation Ocean Development - notice of hearing October 2, 1970, S. B. County Courthouse on proposed Harbor of Refuge at Cojo Anchorage, downcoast of Govt. Point. / Placer Co. Board of Supervisors - copy of Resolution 70-430 requesting review of assessing practices of State Board of Equalization re State assessed property. / Modoc Co. Board of Supervisors - copy of Resolution 70-62 requesting review of assessing practices of State Board of Equalization re State assessed property. / LAFCO Resolutions Nos. 207-211, inclusive - approval of annexations: / Harlan properties to Isla Vista Sanitary District, Bail~rd #8 property to City of Carpinteria; Battis{c;ne #9 property to City of Carpinteria; northeast corner of u. S. Highway 101 Padaro Lane to County Service Area No. 11; and Lot 42, Tract #25,003 . (Willmoor Ventures) to Carpinteria Sanitary District. / County Veterinarian - annual report for FY 1969-70. / State Dept. of Fish Game - report on ''The Natural Resources of Goleta Slough Recommendations for Use Development, August, 1970. '' In the Matter of Planning Commission Reports for Information Only. The following reports were received for information only and ordered placed on file: / Approved request of Seventh Day Adventist Church (70-CP-50) for I Conditional Use Permit for caretaker's cottage patio, 425 Arroyo Road, Hope I I area. 1 Approved request of Modern Neon Sign Co. (70-V-48) on behalf of Motel 6, Texaco, Inc., Kentucky Fried Chicken, et al, Orchid Bowl, Bray's 101 Restaurant for variances from sign regulations to allow relocation of free-standing signs, total sign area, and street frontage during remaining portion of 9-year amortization period caused by widening of Calle Real by the Co\lllty. Oil Drilling Bond Approval I Eu~ene Rene ~ And e LeRoy R/W Contrac & Lois Acquistapa e Brown Rd / Tract 11, 196 September 14, 1970 / Set hearing for October 7, 1970 on request of Road Commissioner (79-G P-4) for amendment to circulation element of County Gener al Plan for portion of Goleta area. ~ Dropped from agenda proposed ordinance (70-0A-13) amending Ordinance No. 453 adding subsections for definitions of ''C'', ''E'', " ''R'' Districts, etc. In the Matter of Recommendation of County Petroleum Engineer for Approval of Oil Drilling Bonds and/or Riders. Pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance No.1927 and in accordance with the reconmendation of the County Petroleum Engineer; Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the following oil drilling bonds and/or riders be, and the same are hereby, approved: /Gilliland Oil" Land Co., Inc. - Fidelity* Deposit Company of Maryland single bond No. 8377900 for $5,000 covering well ''Houk Fee 33-9'', County Permit No. 2506. / Gilliland Oil* Land Company Co., Inc. - Fidelity" Deposit Company of Maryland riders to the following single bonds, increasing liability from $2,000 to $5,000 on each well shown: Bond No. 71-77-066 covering well ''McKenzie No. l'' County Permit No. 533; Bond No. 71-77-065 covering well ''McKenzie No. 2'', County Permit No. 745; Bond No. 80-35-223 covering well "Houk 1143-9'', County Permit No. 1808; and Bond No. 80-35-222 covering well ''Houk 1142-9", County Permit No. 1926. / Shell Oil Company - The Travelers Indemnity Company, rider to Blanket Bond No. S-305 covering well ''Lloyd et al 111'', County Permit No. 3487. ~shell Oil Company - The Travelers Indemnity Company, rider to Blanket Bond No. S-305 covering well ''Careaga B-3'', County permit .No. 3484. / Continental Oil Company - Hartford Accident* Indemnity Company, rider to Blanket Bond No. 3507930 covering well ''United California 41'', County Permit No. 3486. /Continental Oil Company - Hartford Accident " Indemnity Company, rider to Blanket Bond Nb. 3507930 covering well ''United California 3~'', County Permit No. 3485. In the Matter of Execution of Right of Way Contracts with the County from Eugene Rene "Andre LeRoy, and Ronald L. and Lois M. Acquistapace; and Acceptance of Right of Way Grants Conveyed on Donation Basis for Construction of Brown Road, Fifth District, Job No. 5016. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, continued to Monday, September 21, 1970 In the Matter of Recommendation of the Planning Commission to Approve ao roval of ~enta Map ive Tentative Map of Tract #11,196 (Assessor's Parcel No. 9-313-03) Generally Located I on South Side of Danielson Road, First District. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and 15 16 September 14, 1970 carried unanimously, it is ordered that the reconmendation of the Planning Commission to approve the Tentative Map of Tract #11,196 (Assessor's Parcel No. 9-313-03), generally located on the south side of Danielson Road beginning approximately 210 feet east of Olive Mill Road, First District, stamped "Received June 24, 1970, Santa Barbara County Planning Department'' be, and the same is hereby, confirmed, subject to compliance with the following conditions: A. Departmental letters: 1. Road Department dated August 11, 1970. 2. Flood Control dated July 16, 1970. 3. Public Works dated July 17, 1970. 4. Health Department dated August 11, 1970. B Planning Department reconnnended conditions: 1. A street tree planting plan shall be filed for approval by the Planning Department. A bond shall be required in the amount of $7.50 per tree to assure compliance with the approved plan and a cash deposit of $15.00 per tree shall be deposited with the Road Department for maintenance of such trees as are planted within the right-of-way. 2. Pursuant to Board of Supervisors' Resolution No. 24416, electrical utilities shall be installed underground. 3. Modifications from Ordinance No. 1722 are approved on Lots No. 1 and No. 8 to allow both lots a depth less than 100 feet and to allow Lot No. 8 a lot area less than 7,000 square feet. 4. Design of all structures and driveways for each parcel shall be coordinated with the existing trees. Every attempt shall be made to preserve specimen trees. When the street tree planting plan is filed for approval, a tree removal plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for approval. 5. At the time the final map is filed with the County Surveyor's office for checking, the developer shall file evidence, approved by the County Counsel's office, that Mr. L. U. Lombardi, who has a life estate on the subject property, does not have to sign the final map. 6. Reconnnendation to the Board of Supervisors that the offer of dedication to Road ''A'' be waived. 7. Lot 1 may be shown as a single parcel and recorded as the first unit without the necessity of providing Road ''A'' or removing existing buildings. 8. All existing buildings shall be removed prior to recordation of any portion of the final map other than Lot 1 as defined in Condition No. 7. Ci r culation In the Matter of Reactivation of Fourth District Citizens Committee in Element (70 GP - 3) - Lompoc Consideration of Proposed Amendment (70-GP-3) to Circulation Element of the Santa --lfalley Ar ea I Si~n Re p;ula Ordinance 2 I J Barbara County General Plan as it Pertains to the Lompoc Valley Area. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Fourth District Citizens Committee be, and the same is hereby, reconstituted with the same membership, if possible . ions In the Matter of Ordinance No. 2116 - An Ordinance Amending Section 32 of I, Sign Regulations, of Chapter 35, Zoning, of the Code of the County of 16 Article Santa Barbara, as Amended, to Add Thereto the Effective Date of Said Article I (May 28' 1970). Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, the Board passed and adopted Ordinance No. 2116 entitled "An Ordinance Amending Section 32 of Article I, Sign Regulations, of Chapter 35, Zoning, of the Code of the County of Santa Barbara, as Amended, to Add Thereto the Effective Date of Said Article I. '' Upon the roll being called, the following Supervisors voted Aye, to-wit: George H. Clyde, Joe J. Callahan, Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. SALARY Ord Eligibility Supervisor I & Lay- out Typist Welfare I Bi- Weekly Payroll System ( September 14, 1970 In the Matter of Ordinance No. 2117 - An Ordinance of the County of Santa Barbara, Amending Section 6 of Ordinance No. 2041, as Amended, being the Salary Ordinance of the County of Santa Barbara. Upon motion of Supervisor Callahan, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the Board passed and adopted Ordinance No. 2117 of the County of Santa Barbara, entitled "An Ordinance of the County of Santa Barbara Amending Section 6 of Ordinance No . 2041, as Amended, being the Salary Ordinance of the County of Santa Barbara." (Eligibility Supervisor I and II, and Layout Typist, Welfare Department, new position classifications). ' Upon the roll being called, the following Supervisors voted Aye, to-wit: George H. Clyde, Joe J. Callahan, Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell NOES: None ABSENT: None. In the Matter of Report from Administrative Officer on Personnel Management Information System (Bi-Weekly Payroll System). The Administrative Officer reviewed the report submitted to the Board on August 17, 1970 on subject matter. November 1, 1970 is the target date for implementation of the new system, with payroll on a bi-weekly basis with each pay period being of 14 days' duration, beginning on a Sunday and ending on a Saturday; payday will be on the second Thursday following the end of a pay period, or the day before, Wednesday, due to a holiday. There will generally be 26 paydays in a year. Employees will receive their warrants by either mailing warrant to address of employee, if so desired, or the employee may choose to participate in a bank deposit plan. A day or two prior to payday, employees will receive their Earnings and Leave Statement showing all current and year-to-date earnings, leave balances, and net pay. Employees will report their time utilization through the use of a time sheet, and used for p~yroll, labor distribution and statistical purposes . Also, all employees will be paid at the same time; and all statutory and voluntary deductions will be made on each payroll. The implementation of the bi-weekly payroll system requires the establishment of a salary ordinance stating the bi-weekly and hourly rates to be paid. This ordinance will be developed from the current (monthly) salary ordinance to effect little or any change in employee salaries on an annual basis. Every 10 years there will be 27 pay days and the first year in which this occurs is 1975. The first payday with implementation on November 1, 1970 will be Wednesday, November 25, 1970, due to Thanksgiving being on Thursday. It was suggested that the time schedule adopted by administration be approved. Leonard Roders of the Social Workers Union, said they had surveyed their . membership about this new payroll system, and they are split on this issue. They have set up a meeting on September 26th to discuss this whole program, in the Welfare Department. - 1.8 Overtime Policy September 14, 1970 In answer to an inquiry about choosing the date of November 1 to implement this new system, Paul Floyd, Assistant Administrative Officer explained the reasons therefor, and pointed ot that they had originally hoped to put this into effect on July 1, 1970. A reconnnendation will be forthcoming perhaps in two weeks as to which bank will be chosen under contract to service the payroll deposit plan; certain criteria will be used in considering the banks interested. The County will deliver a copy of the magnetic tape showing the net amount of pay for all County employees. On the morning of payday they would have opened an account and that account would be in the form as selected by the employee. The employee will be furnished with a supply of pre-printed, personalized checks with the account number, name and address of the ~mployee, with no bank service charge for the employee to write out a check for deposit or cashing at a bank of his own choosing. The advantage to the employee is that on payday, he doesn't have to line up to get his check. If he is ill or on vacation he doesn't have to worry about getting his check from the County - the full amount of his pay will have already been deposited with the bank chosen by the County and only needs to write a check on that bank for whatever purpose is needed, the same as if he were to take his County warrant for his pay and deposit it to his bank account or cash it, in person or by mail. The advantage to the County is that this process eliminates the necessity of printing and preparing so many warrants, and reconciling statements. If the employee chooses to have his warrant mailed, it is done the day before the payday although there is no guarantee it will be received necessarily the next day due to congestion of the mails. During the discussion, a comnent was made that the timing is not good for this time of the year with holidays coming up; also installment payment dates for houses, cars, etc. will have to be changed to avoid extra charges. The . Administrative Officer pointed out that there will be 26 pay periods so instead of having one monthly check for a full month's pay, in 10 of the 12 months the employee will receive two bi-weekly pay checks for 28 days, which will be slightly less, but in two months out of the year the employee will receive three pay checks, so in the end the employee gets the same annual compensation. The first month to receive the third pay check is April, 1971. Rather than use the January, 1971 target date, it was explained that the first pay period should begin on the first of the month. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried, with Supervisor Clyde abstaining, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, continued to Monday, September 21, 1970 for further consideration. In the Matter of Proposed Amendment to Overtime Policy. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, September 14, 1970 continued to Monday, September 21, 1970, at the request of the Administrative Officer. ~ALARY Resoluti n In the Matter of Allowance of Positions, Disallowance of Positions, and Plannin'1; Publi Works -Buildin~ Fixing of Compensation for Monthly Salaried Positions. (Effective September 14, & Sqfety ef f Sept 14, 1970 1970, Planning Depart~ent and Public Works-Building ~ Safety) I Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESO~UTION NO. 70-574 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FllE) Salary Resoluti n In the Matter of Allowance of Positions, Disallowance of Positions, and Assessor ' s Dept eff 10- 1- 70 Fixing of Compensation for Monthly Salaried Positions. (Effective October 1, 1970, / Mrs . William Bryant, Jr . S B City of represent ative on 0ounty Library Advisory Co1nrn.:ttee / Assessor's Department). Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUIION NO. 70-575 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Appointment of Mrs. William Bryant, Jr. as Representative of City of Santa Barbara on County Library Advisory Comnittee. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the nomination from the City of Santa Barbara of Mrs. William Bryant, Jr. for appointment as City representative on the County Library Advisory Committee be, and the same is hereby, accepted Cancellation of In the Matter of Cancellation of Taxes on the 1970-71 Secured Assessment ~axes City of S B County of s B & Roll o~ Properties Acquired by the City of Santa Barbara, County of Santa Barbara, Calif State ' ; and State of California. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, the following Order was passed and adopted: ORDER WHERE.AS, it appears to the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California, that the City of Santa Barbara, the County of Santa Barbara, and the State of California, Division of Highways, have acquired title to, and are the owners of certain real property situate in the City of Santa Barbara, County of Santa Barbara, and State of California; and WHEREAS, it further appears that application has been made for cancellation of taxes on property described below, as provided by Section 4986 of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California; and WHEREAS, it further appears that the written consent of the County Counsel and County Auditor of said County of Santa Barbara to the cancellation of said taxes has been obtained therefor, 19 20 Cancellatio September 14, 1970 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Auditor and/or Tax Collector of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California, be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to cancel the following taxes on the 1970-71 Secured Roll, penalties and costs applicable, against the property described below: CITY OF SANTA BARBARA -39-322-10 Code 2075 assessed to John R. Lippincott et al - Cancel Land $7,950, Cash Value $31,800, recorded4 -1-70. COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA - 65-090-06 Code 66-031 assessed to George A. Cavalletto, Inc. - Recorded 7-1-70 - Cancel Land $5,150, Cash Value $20,600. 71-122-01 Code 66-004 assessed to Equitable Life Ins. of Iowa - Recorded 7-1-70- Cancel Land $250, Cash Value $1,000. 77-160-46 Code 66-009 assessed to Bowatt Properties, Inc. - Recorded 4~28-70 - Cancel Land $4,750, Cash Value $19,000. 77-160-51 Code 66-009 assessed to Boise Cascade Bldg Co. - Recorded 4-28-70 - Cancel Land $10,250, Cash Value ~41,000. STATE OF CALIFORNIA - 81-210-38 Code 94-006 assessed to Rancho Tajiguas - recorded 6-1-70 - Cancel Land $150, Cash Value $600. 81-210-37 Code 94-006 assessed to Rancho Tajiguas - Recorded 6-1-70 - Cancel Land $5,400, Cash Value $21,600. 99-130-45 Code 72-003 assessed to Allan Collar et al - recorded 4-21-70 - Cancel Land $1,050, Cash Value $4,200. The foregoing Order entered in the Minutes of the Board of Supervisors this 14th day of September, 1970. s/ J , E. LEWIS (SEAT.) County Clerk ' In the Matter of Cancellation of Penaltie , Costs , ~ e ~ e. pti~nRedemption Fees on Certain Parcels on of Penalties, Costs, Redemption Penalties Secured 1969-70 Delinquent/Assessment Roll. Penalties & Redemotion ees Certain Par els Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie seconded by Supervisor Grant, and I carried unanimously, the following Order was passed and adopted: ORDER It satisfactorily appearing to the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California, from a report filed by the County Assessor, that it is necessary to cancel the penalties, costs, redemption penalties and redemption fees on certain parcels listed on the 1969-70 Delinquent Secured Roll; and It further appearing that application has been made to this Board by said . County Assessor for approval of such cancellation as provided by Section 4985 of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California, and that the written consent of the County Counsel and County Auditor of said County to the cancellation has been obtained therefor; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Auditor and/or Tax Collector of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California be, and they are hereby authorized to make the necessary cancellation of penalties, costs, redempt.ion penalties and redemption fees for the following parcels as correctionS were requested, ordered - Corrections to 1970- 71 Secured .l\ssessment qoll I I September 14, 1970 and made to these assessments, and the taxes have been paid: 17-213-21 Code 2001 31-302-01 Code 2001 123-033-11 Code 3000 99-390-11 Code 57-021 99-030-02 Code 80-008 23-162-30 Code 86-019 The foregoing Order entered in the Minutes of the Board of Supervisors this 14th day of September, 1970. s/ J. E. LEWIS (SEAL) County Clerk In the Matter of Corrections to the 1970-71 Secured Assessment Roll. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, the following Order was passed and adopted: ORDER It satisfactorily appearing to the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California, from a report filed by the County Assessor, that corrections have been made in certain assessments, and application having been made to this Board by said County Asse~sor for ap~roval of such ~orrections to the 1970-71 Secured Assessment Roll, as provided by the Revenue and Taxation Code, Sections 4831, 4831.5, 4834 and 4835; and It further appearing that the written consent of the County Counsel and County Auditor of said County of Santa Barbara to the corrections has been obtained therefor; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Auditor and/or Tax Collector of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California be, and they are hereby, authorized to make the necessary corrections in the 1970-71 Secured Assessment Roll, as set forth: 43-100-02 Code 2001 assessed to Kims Nurseries Ltd. - Cancel Land $1,000, Cash Value $4,000 because of a clerical error - this property was accepted by the City of Santa Barbara as a street by Resolution dated February 27, 1956. 33-062-24 Code 2001 assessed to Clarence/Myrtle Kinkade - Cancel Improvements $1,200, Cash Value $4,800 because of a clerical error in the allocation of values in the lot split. 121-011-08 Code 3000 assessed to Rancho Bowl - Cancel Land $1,000, Cash Value $4,000 because of a clerical error in acreage as shown on the map - Assessment based on 2.81 acres instead of 2.61. 127-5~0-04 Code 87-001 assessed t.~ ~ena . ~ . B':15~ et al - Cancel Improvements $1,100, Cash Value $4,400 because building belongs to Homestake Prod. Co. and is billed on the Unsecured roll. 413-070-51 Code 67-009 assessed to L. L. Kirchoff - Cancel Mineral Rights $7,545, Impr ovements $1 , 225, Real Property Cash Value $35,280 because of a correction in cost of production submitted by cer tified public accountants. 93-040-27 Code 72-0lJ assessed to Edith P. Sanor - Cancel Land $250, Cash Value $1,000 because of a clerical error - 12.04 acres of flood control easement computed in error as part of acreage. The foregoing, Order entered in the Minutes of the Board of Supervisors this 14th day of September , 1970. s/ J. E. LEWIS (SEAL) County Clerk 21 22 Corr.;ctions 1970- 71 Uns Assessment Roll ( September 14, 1970 In the Matter of Corrections to the 1970-71 Unsecured Assessment Roll. cured Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, the following Order was passed and adopted: ORDER It satisfactorily appearing to the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California, f rom a report filed by the County Assessor, that corrections have been made in certain Assessments, and application having been made .to .this Board by said County Assessor for approval of such corrections to the 1970-71 Unsecured Assessment Roll, as indicated on the attached list as provided by the Revenue and Taxation Code, Section 4831, 4831.5, 4832, 4834, 4835, 4985, and 4986; and It further appearing that the written consent of the County Counsel and County Auditor of said County of Sa nta Barbara to the corrections has been obtained therefor, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Auditor and/or Tax Collector of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California, be, and they are hereby authorized to make the necessary corrections in the 1970- 71 Unsecured Assessment Roll, as set . forth be low: ' l \ Page 1 September &.9e__ I From the assessment of Sommer Nicholas J dba Sommer Masonry, tnx bill 1- 000- 138, parcel number 91- 103-01- 002, STRIKE OFF, ~ersonal property $120 assessed value, $500 cash value, taxes , all penalties and costs . Assessee not in business as of lien date, 1970. From the assessment of Burgess, Elizabeth, tax bill 1- 000- 5369, parcel 89 - 200 ~22 -129, STRIKE OFF , inventory $540 assessed value, $2,180 cash value, $162 i~ventory exemption, taxes , all penalties and costs . Duplicate assessment of produce . See tax bill 1- 000- 4252, Burgess, Elizabeth . From the assessment of National Cash Register Co The, tax bill 1 - 000- 8821, parcel 0- 000-00-011, STRIKE OFF, personal property $2,120 assessed value, $8,510 cash value, taxes, all penalties and costs . Taxpayers error . Incorrect situs area reported . To be rebilled in cor.rect code area, VAFB 72- 008, parcel 0- 000- 00- 381. From the assessment of Robb, Dawson E. , tax bill 2- 001- 1354, parcel CF 5229 EB- 001 , STRIKE OFF, personal property $270 assessed value, $1,100 cash value, taxes , all penalties and costs . Duplicate assessment. Boat located and assessed in Ventura County . From the assessment of Santa Barbara Equip Corp/City of Carp, tax bill 2- 001 -5499, parcel number 17- 010- 12- 009, STRIKE OFF, personal property $1,350 assessed value, $5, 430 cash value, taxes, all penalties and costs . Erroneously reported as leased equipment, \'Thereas same \'las actually purchased and 0\'1ned by the City of Carpinteria . From the assessment of Scherbovitsch Vladimir dba Universal Auto Repairs , tax bill 2- 001- 8996, parcel number 17- 171- 01- 002, PARTIAL STRIKE OFF, personal property $580 assessed value, ~2 ,340 cash value leaving a balance of personal property ~610 assessed value, $2, 450 cash value . Amended assessment due to over- valuation as determined by actual field appraisal by Auditor- Appraiser . From the assessment of Zumdahl, Gary, dba Baby Originals of Santa Barbara, tax bill 2- 001-9026, parcel 25- 363- 18- 005, STRIKE OFF, $340 assessed value, $1 ,370 cash value, taxes, all penalties and costs . Duplicate assessment . See tax bill 2- 001- 9025, Zumdahl, Gary Arlen . From the assessment of Deep Steam Carpet Cleaners Inc. , tax bill 2- 001-9206, parcel 37- 173- 35-003, STRIKE OFF, $330 assessed value, $1,350 cash value, taxes all penalties and costs . Taxpayers error. :$quipment sold prior to lien date, 1970 . Erroneously reported by accountant . 4 September 4, 1970 5/ r:.1 K ' OFF /Cf/, From the assessment of Rose Clark, tax bill 2- 001 - 9237, parcel number 45-023- 01-001 , personal property $380 assessed value, $1, 530 cash value, taxes, all penalties and costs . Assecsor ' s error . Erroneous assessec . See Rose Jack Cons true ti on, parcel number l.!5 - 023-01- 002. From the assessment of OBrien, Thomas G MD, tax bill 2- 001-10468, parcel 25- 112- 20-019, PARTIAL STRIKE OFF, personal property $230 assessed value, $890 cash value , taxes, all penalties and costs, leaving a balance of $520 assessed value, $2, 110 cash value . Taxpayers error . Revised assessment per amended return filed by taxpayer to correct error on original filing . From the assessment of Encanto Products Inc , tax bill 2- 001- 11221, parcel number 31- 231- 19- 001, STRIKE OFF, personal property $10, 010 assessed value, $40, 040 cash value, taxes, all penalties and costs . Incorrect assessee as of lien date, 1970. See Vigon Lighting Co ., parcel number 31- 231 - 19- 002 . From the assessment of Frank, Sidney R., tax bill 2- 018-9373, parcel 73- 080- 10- 052, PARTIAL STRIKE OFF , land $220 assessed value, $900 cash value, improvements $650 assessed value, $2,600 cash value, taxes , all penalties and costs , leaving a balance of land $250 assessed value $1 , 000 cash value, improvements $1,120 assessed value, $4,500 cash value, total $1,370 assessed value . Error in term of possession. Corrected due to addi tional infor mation . From the assessment of Shell Oil Co ., tax bill 2- 018- 9390, parcel 73- 080- 17- 035, PARTIAL STRIKE OFF, land $5, 000 assessed value, $20, 000 cash value, taxes, all penalties and costs, leaving a balance of land $14, 750 assessed value, $59, 000 cash value . Error in term of possession. Corr ected due to additional information. From the assessment of Loretz John P, tax bill 2-062- 6683, ~ arcel number 37- 051-05- 002, PARTIAL STRIKE OFF, personal ryroperty $320 assessed value, $1, 260 cash value, taxes , all ~ enalties and costs , leaving a balance of personal property $320 assessed value, $1, 300 cash value . Revised assessment per amended return f i l ed by taxpayer. Ver i f ied by Audi tor Appraiser . From the assessment of Santa Maria Coin Op Dry Cleaning, tax bill 3- 001- 9663, parcel number 117- 210- 01- 004, STRIKE OFF, personal property $1,250 assessed value, $5, 000 cash value, taxes , all penalties and costs ~ Out of business and equipment r emoved pr ior to l ien dat e , 1970 . ' . . Page 3 September 4, 1970 From the assessment of Henderson Philip, tax bill 5- 002- 2706, parcel CF 4144 EB-001, STRIKE OFF, personal property $250 assessed value, $1,000 cash value, taxes, all penalties and costs . Boat r emoved from Santa Barbara County prior to lien date, 1970 . From the assessment of Hylton Oil Co ., tax bill 5?- 015-7458, parcel 401- 040-60-001, PARTIAL STRIKE OFF, personal property $4,850 assessed value, $19,420 cash value, taxes, all penalties and costs , leavin~ a balance of personal property $7,200 assessed value, $28,blO cash value . Taxpayers error . Revised assessment based on additional information submitted by company . From the assessment of Mack Frank J ., and Carolyn, dba Rocket Service Station and Cuyama Trlr Pk, tax bill 63- 002-9993, parcel 147- 044- 37- 001, STRIKE OFF, personal property $50 assessed value, $200 cash value, inventory $550 assessed value, $2,200 cash value, inventory exemption $165, taxes, all penalties and costs . Assessor's error. Not stlfficient - --value . Verified by appraiser ' s field chec~ - From the assessment of Miller Michael/Sandra, dba Brothers Galley, tax bill 66- 008-1, parcel 73- 020- 07- 001, STRIKS OFF, personal property $4,490 assessed value, $17 , 970 cash v~lue, taxes , all pena~ties and costs . /Equipment sol d prior to lien date . See revised assessment to lien date ovrner, Hamburger Manor, parcel 73- 020-0/- 002. . From the assessment of Archibald Jo~ W., tax bill 66- 011- 3002, parcel CF 1233 CZ-001, STRIKE OFF, personal property $230 assessed value, $930 cash value, taxes , all penalties and costs . Boat removed from Santa Barbara County prior to lien date, 1970 . From the assessment of Goleta Valley Orchids Inc ., tax bill 66- 017- 10992, parcel 65- 240- 29- 001, STRIKE OFF, personal property $190 assessed value, $790 cash value, inventory p450 assessed value, $1,800 cash value, inventory exemption ~ 135, taxes, all penalties and costs . Taxpayer ' s error . Revised assessment due to information supplied by taxpayer. ?roperty destroyed by fire in 1969 . No personal property on hand lien date, 1970. From the assessment of Diversifie Equipment Leasing Corp., tax bill 66- 031- 11269, parcel 0- 000-00-147, STRIKE OFF, personal property $440 assessed value, $1,760 cash val ue, taxes , all penal ties and cos ts 'J;'axpayer ' s error. Incorrect report, no pr operty in Santa Barbar a County as of lien date, 1970. J ./ ' page 4 September 4 , 1970 ,.!fl SIR I 1-I! o Fr From the assessment o~eal Robert S. , tax bill 66- 088- 3285, parcel CF 1646 CK- 001, personal property $210 assessed va l ue, 0850 cash value, taxes, all penalties and costs . Boat removed from Santa Barbara County prior to lien date, 1970. From the assessment of Refugio Beach Concession, tax bill 94- 006- 11198, parcel 81- 210- 13-003, PARTIAL STRIKE OFF, land $2 , 000 assessed value, $8, 000 cash value, taxes, all penalties and costs , leaving a balance of land $1 , 000 assessed value, $4, 000 cash value, improvements $1,750 assessed value, $7, 000 cash value, total $2,750 assessed value . Computation error of gross income and economic rent . Additional information furnished by taxpayer . ---- - I ) I ./ ' Gerald L. Beal Educational Leave of Absence I September 14, 1970 The foregoing Order entered in the Minutes of the Board of Supervisors this 14th day of September , 1970. In the Matter of Directing County Auditor to Draw Warrants in Favor of Gerald L. Beal in Accordance with Stipend Award Regulations of State Department of Social Welfare during Educational Leave of Absence. The Welfare Director submitted subject written r equest following receipt on September 2, 1970 of a copy of the graduate education stipend agreement form f r om the State Department of Social Welfare indicating that Mr. Gerald L. Beal had been granted a stipend in the amount of $3,150. An educational leave of absence ' had been grated for Mr. Beal who will be attending Fresno State College. The s tipend is for attendance for the period beginning September of 1970 and ending June of 1971. The stipend award notice form from the State Department of Social Wel~are indicates that the stipend check should be paid in equal payments, not less frequently than one each month, beginning in October and ending the series of payments in the month of May, 1971, with checks mailed out by the County Welfare Department. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the County Auditor be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to draw warrants, commencing October 1, 1970, and continuing through and including May 1, 1971, each in the amount of $393.75, not to exceed the total amount of $3,150.00, in favor of Gerald L. Beal, in accordance with the stipend award regulations submitted by the State Department of Social Welfare. It is further ordered that the warrants shall be mailed to Mr. Beal by the Santa Barbara County Welfare Department. ~3 Sheriff ' s Benefit In the Matter of Request of Sheriff's Benefit Relief Association for Wage & Relief Associat ' on I and Benefit Consideration. The Clerk read a letter filed with the Board from John W. DaFoe, President of the Sheriff's Benefit Relief Association of Santa Brabara County, requesting an appearance before the Board at this time. The Clerk read a letter from Morton H. Dewhirst, Salary Committee Chairman of the Sheriff's Association, dated September 2, 1970, giving the background on submission of a list of salary and benefit proposals from Association representatives earlier this year for evaluation by the Administrative Officer. The letter indicated the Association Committee would meet again with the Administrative Officer on September 10, 1970 to discuss another salary and f r inge benefit package which is felt to be mandatory to implement and to avoid a concerted drastic action by most of the Sheriff's Depar tment per sonnel. Morale is at an all time low and the necessary pay adjustments to bring then up to parity with the comparable eight counties used for pay purposes would hopefully alleviate a part of this problem. Reference was made to an enclosed statement appearing in the Association News-Letter from President John DaFoe as well as cer tain exhibits containing salary figures. R. D. Johnson, Administrative Officer, commented that he had met with Sheriff's Association representatives last Thursday, September 10, 1970, and last May in a , 24 September 14, 1970 similar request. This meeting had been called to inform the Associations representatives of the time table. After establishing the meeting date, he received a copy of the letter, dated September 2, 1970 , from the Association, addressed to, and read to the Board. It was pointed out that this office was not in a position to make recommendations regarding salaries and new benefit requests as the data-collecting process used in making such reconmendations are not complete. It was necessary to I make recommendations regarding all employees simultaneously in order that all employees are considered alike. In reading from a prepared statement, Mr. Johnson said that on June 19, 1970, their requests were responded to by letter, at which time the Board's salary-setting policy was outlined. This is not the first request which has come before the Board regarding special salary adjustments, and he has advised on each occasion that the policy guide precluded specialized group treatment; and to make a change for one group without considering all would be most unfair and inequitable, and would most likely lead to larger morale problems and far more general employee dissatisfaction. Mr. Johnson understands that it is unlawful for public employees to strike, so it is difficult to accept the threat by law enforcement officers dedicated to uphold the law. During the past two years, the Sheriff's law enforcement personnel have been granted salary increases which in the aggregate amount to almost 22%. There have been liberal additions to the fringe benefits (some of which have not been provided to other employees). If any of the personnel intend to carry out their threat to strike, they should be made aware of some of the possible consequences such as removal from the payroll during the period of absence; may be terminated if absent for five days; and if terminated, accumulated sick leave is removed and even if re-employed, the termination results in a break in service which may have a detrimental effect. It is necessary to have a system and schedule and to treat all employees on the same basis. Lieutenant Michael Swan, Chairman of the Membership Committee, S. B. County Sheriff's Benefit ~Relief Association, appeared and read from a prepared statement, a copy of which was filed with the Clerk. Reference was made to a report, entitled ''The Challenge of Crime In a Free Society'' prepared by the President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice,which contains recommendations from most highly skilled, .educated, and professionally experienced people. President Johnson, on July 23, 1965 , recognizing the urgency of the nation's crime problem and the depth of ignorance about it, established this Commission through Executive Order 11236. This general report, published in 1967, embodies all the major findings - drawn from examination of every facet of crime and law enforcement in America Lieutenant Swan proceeded to quote from various sections of this report in which the Conmission made a recommendation that it is apparent more police are needed, and that municipalities must face up to the urgency of that need, and provide the resources required to meet it if crime is to be controlled. Concerning commiinity relation problems, the rapid processing and release of low misdemeanants during a period of civil disorder is essential lest alienation occur. , 24 A , \ September 14, 1970 By comparison, he said County administration reconmends reduction of level of service, a recommendation for less deputies throughout the entire County, cutting 19 officers from new jail staffing after two recent riots. The cost to County government in fighting law suits and court time will no doubt exceed those positions. ' The proposed five-man walking beat in Isla Vista will not alleviate the alienation caused by following administration's recommendations. The need has never been greater to increase police salaries, especially maximums, to competitive levels . Police salary scales should be re-examined, according to the Commission's recommendations, which, in most cases, are now too low to attract the best qualified recruits or to keep the best qualified policeman. The responsibility of this county to control riots quickly and professionally goes far beyond the mere local level as evidenced by headlines across the nation depicting the frequency, the length of local riots which adds fuel to the ambitions of other militants and other radicals located far beyond the confines of this county. Attention must also be concentrated on the deadly narcotics problem. Lieutenant Morton H. Dewhirst, Salary Committee Chairman for the Sheriff's Association, appeared and read from a prepared statement which pointed out the critical problem existing in law enforcement, and spoke of the frustrations in the Sheriff's Department during this year. Salaries and fringe benefits are only a portion of the existing problems. This is one of the three critical counties in the State who has such problems; Alameda and Los Angeles Counties have equal problems. Law enforcement is different than other types of County work, and this must be recognized. The City of Santa Baroara is proposing for the police officers a salary range of $784-951 compared to Santa Barbara County's deputy sheriff range of $690-839 . Mr. Pat Burdick, Chief Counsel for PORAC (Peace Officers Research Association of Calif9rnia) was introduced to the Board. Recognized as one of the top negotiators who has been involved inl other police strikes he is here for two separate distinct reasons. In appearing before the Board, Mr. Burdick stated that PORAC has an unwavering policy that when any of its associations gets involved in a labor management crisis which poses a serious threat to cessation of law enforcement activity, he is required to make an investigation and make a reconnnendation to PORAC. He is required as Chief Counsel to appear and make an investigation when any local association of PORAC requests financial or legal assistance in any labor management crisis. Both of those situations exist in this County today. He has made an investigation, and will report to the Governing Board of PORAC, during lunchtime, that this County's Sheriff's Benefit ~Relief Association has good cause and, he believes, the best cause of any case he has investigated for the past five years for the position it has taken. He will reconnnend that the local Sheriff's Association get all the assistance, legal and financial, at their command. His reconnnendations will be followed by PORAC. He reiterated that he has investigated practically every serious labor management crisis of law enforcement in the State of California for the past five years. The situation of the Sheriff's personnel is deplorable -and requires deep consideration. ' 24 B September 14, 1970 John DaFoe, Pr esident of the Sher iff's Relief* Benefit Association of Santa Barbara County, appeared and read from a prepared statement. They want to provide a decent standard of l iving for themselves and their families, and they should not be penalized for the challenge that is offered in their work. It is easy to take advantage of them and that is what the Cowity has been doing for a long time. It is difficult not to think about wages. These men are a dedicated, . fine bunch of men. Their pr esence here today is an act of bravery. They are professional law enforcement officers, not negotiators, and are aware that their careers are on the line. While they are aware of their responsibilities, it is time Santa Barbara County recognizes them - loyalty and dedication must be a twoway street. Thursday at 2 p.m. is the deadline to decide. James Webster, County Sheriff, felt that he should comnent on this presentation this morning because the presentation was most sincere and a great deal of thought has been given in checking on the background. These problems, however, do not only exist in the south coast area; there are labor problems in the northern part of the County and many of the criminal matters have to be recognized and considered. Sheriff Webster stated that in 1947 the Board of Supervisors incorporated in the office of Sheriff the office of Coroner; and in the eight-county sample only. three Sheriff-Coroner offices are considered. When this. was consolidated, it was as an economy measure. There were 50 coroner cases per year before, and now there are 600 cases per year - they are long, technical investigated cases that cause a great deal of concern, so this, too, should be considered. With regard to the basic salary, this County is low compar ed with the other 8 comparable counties. It is imperative that law enforcement agencies in this area be considered. He refer red to the salaries offered by the City of Santa Barbara as well as UCSB. In conclusion, he said the Board is being asked to discuss this matter and negotiate it at a very critical time. R. D. Johnson, Administrative Officer, referred to a co1ID11ent made by Lieutenant Dewhirst regarding the del ivery to him of their letter for which he acknowledged delivery - there is only a misunderstanding, not disagreement. He also said several statements were made which are out of context or incorrect. He emphasized one statement that is incorrect - that the County Administrative Officer has refused to negotiate. If they mean refusal to grant a r equest is refusal to ' negotiate, that is right. Mr. Johnson said he will always meet and confer, as required by law. He believes all live in a system where there is give and take, and he is willing to consider the other side. He emphasized that his primary responsibility is to carry out Board of Supervisors policy in salary or any other matter of management of the County. In so doing, he is going to play it as uniformly as possible, and that has been his approach in dealing with the Sheriff's people. He said he regrets that they feel that their situation is so grave that they must take this form to convince the Board and administration of their problem 24 c September 14, 1970 He restated what he had stated Thursday - that Santa Barbara County has a law - enforcement problem. This is true nation-wide. The salary adjustments for law enforcement personnel has been almost 22% which is a substantial increase for employees. There have also been expansion in fringe benefits. He said administration has listened and responded, but there has to be a limit. He has to administer the program on a uniform basis. Supervisor Callahan pointed out the seriousness of this matter, and perhaps certain corrections will be made but he cannot approve the idea that this group will walk off their jobs Thursday. He indicated his willingness to go along and seriously consider talking with representatives of the Sheriff's Association and employees of the County along with the Administrative Officer and Personnel Officer. He requested them to reconsider what they have said this morning about their demands being met or going on strike. The Administrative Officer felt the necessity of the Board going into Executive Session in view of the statements made by the President of the Sheriff's Association, for certain considerations that should be taken up. Supervisor Grant stated that law enfor cement today is vastly different than what is was a few short years ago. The Sheriff's Department has demonstrated, particularly in 1970, that they are dedicated men in performing work under very difficult circ11mstances, and they should be compensated if the eight-county sample is going to be used as an index. On the matter of overtime, the Administrative Officer explained the approach in handling the matter of overtime in which some things are common to public agencies, some to private industry and business, and some that are unique to this County, all of which are difficult to understand and administer as .a whole. There is more and more recognition being given to the time and one-half concept which has been long in coming into public service, because the County only has the expense to consider, not profit, as compared with others. Therefore, it must be kept to an absolute minimum. Witn regard to overtime compensation for command officers, it is only provided for emergency categories. With regard to educational incentive, he said that at the present time, 2-1/2% is provided for AA degree and intermediate POST certificate; and 5% for BA or advanced POST certificate. They are asking for doubling of this type of pay, and he feels the Association has failed to be consistent. I~. com' parison with other agencies and counties, they are related to salaries but not for the fringe benefits. Chairman Clyde said that he feels one of the major problems involved is setting the January , l date for salaries. As it works out for the Sheriff's Department, in comparison with the 8-county sample, for six months of the year the employees were getting more than the other c9unties and less for the next six months of 1970. Serious considerat-ion should be given for the County as a whole if the January 1 date is to be maintained. It was his personal feeling that until the Board can make that decision, he didn 't think a large group of employees could be treated separately from the remaining 2,000-odd persons; and the adjustments in salaries are to be made as well as fringe benefits from reconnnendations made as planned in September 14, 1970 in November by the Administrative Officer, with action taken by the Board befor e December 1, to become effective January 1, 1971. All associations and groups of employees should receive consideration on this. Supervisor Tunnell said he agrees that the basic problem seems to be the effective date of the increase propose4 to be made. Perhaps the January 1 date is not the best time of the year to set salaries. He rejected completely and emphatically the suggestion that was made that the Board has been unconcerned or unaware of the importance of the Sheriff's Department, and unconcerned with trying to make reasonable adjustments. The Board has made an honest endeavor to adjust these salaries in a fair manner. He regretted that the Sheriff's personnel have deemed it necessary to hold this club over the Board's heads. He didn't feel it necessary that they threaten to walk out. Supervisor Tunnel~ asked Mr. Burdick how many of the cases he has been involved in during the past five years resulted in a walk out, and Mr. Burdick replied that in Vallejo police and fire employees were off the job for five days; the San Diego firefighters were out for three days; the Oakland police were three hours away from the deadline before negotiations produced agreement. He also explained the consequences in certain cases. Deputy DaFoe said that they have always been willing to meet with anyone to avert a strike, and if a sincere effort had been made, all this would be unnecessary. Regarding overtime, he said they agree and there should be a new overtime policy that makes it fair and equitable for everyone. An explosive situation st111 exists in various parts of the County - the University campus, l abor people in Santa Maria, etc. There is the need for educational pay incentive. There are some areas where a good percentage of the people they deal with are highly educated people, and the Sheriff's personnel must be as well educated as they are. The November 15, 1970 date for reconnnendations on salary adjustments is not acceptable because a lot can happen before then. He said they only want a solid coDJDittment of what is going to be effective January 1, 1971. Their position remains the same - to walk out on Thursday at 2 p.m. Chairman Clyde said all departments are separate, different, and have different, problems. It is impossible to make a committment now for January 1,1971 on the percentage amount until the Board gets the whole picture for all employees in the County. It is not realistic or fair for the rest of the employees. The Board recessed at 11:45 a.m. to meet in Executive Session. The Board reconvened at 12:30 o'clock, p.m. Present: Supervisors George H. Clyde, Joe J. Callahan, Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell; and J. E. Lewis, Clerk. Supervisor Clyde in the Chair. Chairman Clyde announced that the Boardmet in Executive Session and the Administrative Officer, County Counsel, and Director of Personnel have been directed to meet this evening with representatives of the Sheriff's Benefit ~ Relief Association, at 7:30 p.m. in the Board of Supervisors Conference Room, County Administration Buil~ ing, to discuss salary recommendations to be made to the Board, and a report will 24 D - 24 E September 14, 1970 be made to the Board on Tuesday, September 15, 1970, at 2 o'clock, p.m. Sergeant Kearns, Secretary of the Sheriff's Benefit Relief Association, asked if an impartial third party could be in attendance during this evening's meeting, and Chairman Clyde advised him that the meeting shall be held by the people involved only. Sergeant Kearns felt that an impartial Third party would be beneficial to both sides. He reserved that right at this time to request this third impartial ' party at a later date. The Board recessed at 12:45 o'clock, p.m. to 2 o'clock, p.m. this date. Allowance of Claims September 14, 1970 The Board recessed until 2 o'clock, p.m At 2 o'clock, p.m the Board reconvened Present: Superyisors Joe J. Ca_ll_ahan, Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, and Cl!E_ti~ Tunnell ; and J. E. Lewis, Clerk. Absent: Supervisor George H. Clyde. Supervisor Callahan as Vice-Chairman , In the Matter of Allowance of Claims. Upon motion, duly seconded, and carried unanimously, it is prdered that the following claims be, and the same are hereby allowed, each claim for the amount and payable out of the fund designated on the face of each claim, respectively, to-wit: Aye, to-wit: (See Claims List) (Page 28) Upon the roll being called, the following Supervisors voted Joe J. Callahan, Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell NOES: None. ABSENT: George H. Clyde. Ratification of In the Matter of Ratification of Approval of Claims Against Approval of 0laim Against Co Sept. the County on Tuesday, September 8, 1970 with Signatures of Three Supervisors. 8, 1970 with Sign tures of 'rhree Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor upervi sors / Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the approval and signing of claims against the County of Santa Barbara on Tuesday, September 8, 1970, with signatures of three Supervisors be, and the same is hereby, ratified Approoriation, In the Matter of Requests f6r Appropriation, Cancellation or Cancellation or Revision of Funds Revision of Funds. I Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, the following requests for appropriation, cancellation or revision of funds are hereby approved, in the budget classifications and , amounts shown, and the Auditor be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to make the necessary transfers: Transfer from: Data Processing - 66 A 1 Regular Salaries $5,000 to 66 A 4, General Fund District Attorney - 15-A-l, $2,000; to 15-A-4, General Fund . General Fund (Safety) $ 46,740. 88 25 26 Exec of Agr btw Cities Co-Wide Li b System I Discr etiona Contr , Law Enforcement Assistance Administrat thru Calif Council on Criminal Justice / Exec of Jt Exe r cise September 14, 1970 General Fund (General) Road Fund Petroleum. Dept. Fund Trns. Wrk. CAP Fund S.B. Co. Fld. Contr. * Wtr. Cons. Dist. Mtce. Fund Laguna Co. San. Dist. Gen. Fund. Includes $12,116.10 C/L Pen Transfer to - - - - - - - - - - - - - $126,382.01 10,024.92 280.21 640.72 2,703.55 503.32 - - - - - - - Employees' Retirement Fund - $187,275.61 em' t In the Matter of Execution of Agreement between the CoWlty of Santa or a~arbara and the Cities of Santa Barbara, Lompoc, and Santa Maria for Operation of County-Wide Free Library System, with Appropriation of $598,687 during FY 1970-71, and Per Capita Level of Service of $2.30 for Each Inhabitant of the County. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUIION NO. 70-576 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FD.,E) In the Matter of Discretionary Contract, Law Enf9rcement Assistance Administration, Project #71-DF-486, in the Amount of $52,250, through California on Council on Criminal Justice. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the Administrative Officer. In the Matter of Execution of Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement between Powe r s Agr e m' tCounty, Flood Control District, and City of Lompoc, to Provide for Construction of Constr of Pedestr ian Brdge aero s t-1iguel i to Channel , Ci y Lomnoc , Fld Contr l & Co I Cuyama Soil Conservatio District Formation & Naming Directors I Pedestrian Bridge across Miguelito Channel, Lompoc. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried Wtanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: ( RESOLUIION NO. 70-577 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FD.,E) In the Matter of Canvass of Votes on Cuyama Soil Conservation District, and Declaring Formation of said District and Naming Directors. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUIION NO. 70-578 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FD.,E) Rat~ficatio In the Matter of Ratification of Authorization for Supervisor Daniel G. of Auth for Supervisor Grant to Sign Argument in Favor of Civil Service Initiative Ordinance. Daniel Gran Sign Argume t Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and in Favor of Civi l Se r vi e Initiative Ordinance I ' - September 14, 1970 Claims List September 8, 1979 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ' FUND'-----===c:=:__ ___ -JJATE NUMBER 1111 Ul.J 1111 1114 1111 II.If IU7 PAYEE ua WUlUil ._., Ill tiU&lil ._ QM . --- 111 ~ _. . 11.D IPI 1111 1111 llJt IUS . . . ~- ~ a. llll1a:Ma 9aiY _, l&I . , PURPOSE . 1117 ., ., . 11tl Ml lltl ACl!57 lawdilSa._ . _ _ SYMBOL ltl a U lit - 111 - 1uau 117. 11 HO 8 lJa r 1'71 WARRANT ALLOWED FOR . 21. 19.JI . ,.,_ n. 1.1 llJ.M M.M 11.74 . UI . u n.TJ , . u , 111 . u . Sl.71 u , 11 . REMARKS MiJU 11911 , . lU I . ll l-, u - -_, _, 1 . IMJ.I -u 11.- 1911 u.- u,. aa 1~au 1191 1U.-.D.tuJI.D- . cu u . . 111 I l 111 11.IOI& ~Ul.- UYalllJ.IS a 117811 . CV NUMBER UAI M7 . . 6111 GM Ull 117 ue Olt ., lltl 1111 IU Ull 1117 ,. IUI . ll7l an 117J AM 871 an . ,. . - 6 Ul tla ,., AC 1157 AUDITbR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANT A BARBARA COUNTY , 1 FUND_ __.;;_-=== -- - --DATE,_- PAYEE . -UfillMl ~--- 1.-. waltllrY.e ~ . 1 . ~ . tfUUiillL_ .u . aid.la . -. . . .WAllll . Odil . . --~u u . . d . "'_ . . ,. . PURPOSE .,. 1&1 . . . SYMBOL l i a 11 laU I a II a ta II Uaae UaU Ull u.an l7 an . . a II . , 1 a al' 11921 h ot . ' WARRANT ALLOWED FOR 11.M u . . Ul.IO . ,. 11 . . . 1 n. M.19 ., . . .u llfill . u . ,. . ., . I.Ml . "'' u1. 416w Ul.M . . ., . . ,.u _ _ , . ' ;' REMARKS a11, . ~ . ' . . I NUMBER . . , - - '111 . . . .,. - - - - -- ' ., - - a: 1111 mt tllT 1111 . AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANTA BARBARA COUNTY \ I f ' FUND'- -= = ---'-'-;,___DATE.-.: =-==-===:.__:. ~.1 f1M PAYEE PURPOSE . . , . __ -- . Md . . . . .-,.M .l . , . . . . . . ~ . a.Acr e.ui IMU. . U . _ -- . .-. . SYMBOL l WARRANT ALLOWED FOR , . . - . . . " '' . . . . nau . nt.M ., a IA ' n.is . ,. . - . . - . - . , a.--. 1 , Ut . . . AC-1117 REMARKS U& . j I .".9.M . NUMBER . , . . . . ., . 1 lltJ 114 ., - - . . . . . . . AC-US7 AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER PAYEE . _ . aauj_. . _ . ,. . . -~ . .__ . -.u. . . * ., . ~--. . .-. " ---. '- SANT A BARBARA COUNTY PURPOSE . . . . . . eua,. - . . -., . ,. Ol'ij;GldM._ I SYMBOL ta . . I WARRANT ALLOWED FOR REMARKS U P9M JH ut9ll UJ.e n.u . .'.~ u. . 1L . , . .,. . . . . II.Lii ., , 1?.u u . . . 111.as au. as 17M . . , . . I . l NUMBER . . . , . ,. tlYl ,. ,. ,. ,. .,. . . ., & . . ., -. . . . . - . . . AC-1!57 v- "" ' AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER t . . SANT A BARBARA COUNTY , ~ ! , PAYEE il . . , . 6tiiia . ., . ~ . a.a . . IAlll . ~-- a.a a . . au. . . . 111111 . . . . PURPOSE . SYMBOL . - UI II &ll u Ill a II , e. 1na WARRANT ALLOWED FOR 11 ut.u . . n.u u . u .,. M.10 u . It. . JA l.111 . s.tn.n . 1.IGM s.n1.u ~ , . . . 111.11 . . 412.70 . . &. REMARKS AD -' . ' ~ . . .~ -\ NUMBER . , . . . . , . . . , . . . . , . . 1 Ull - m . . Ml 11U . , AC I !57 \ . AUOITOR,S WARRANT REGISTER . . . , SANT A BARBARA COUNT:Y I : j t , PAYEE . , PURPOSE . ~ . . ~~! . . )' . -llliUllUll-l.-. - ----'-" ~ . ~ - 1tJlU.lla . . . . . . ., . . ~ 'llliiatdtllMlll _ . . . - ' SYMBOL . . - waas UlaM t WU I ' lfMAfl WARRANT ALLOWED FOR . . ., .,. . . . - . . . n- . .,. . . ' , __ n. . , .~. . ~ ut. ., . REMARKS ,._, . . . . . NUMBER - . . . ,., . . . . , a . . tl8 . . QM . . , . ' , m ,. .,. ,. . ., ' ;'I'"' - r ""\. ,. l . ; ,or/ iJ . I I'- 1 ;f ' ~I . . . . . , ; AUDij;*~R'S WARRANT .REGlS'tER . : . - SANT A BARBARA COUNTY , , ' . PAYEE .l . . _ WUUiilaA;.lllillaaiil . """ . . __. . .' . . . . . ""_ . . . . . . . . . . - . . ' , . ~ PURPOSE . , SYMBOL 11111 . . . . .1. U1 :all UY an , . . WARRANT ALLOWED FOR .,_ ! . . . . . .,. .a . ' . ,_ $'. :; I . . ~ . ua.u " 1Md8 a !Ltl .,. . . "Y.c6.~o.cK . . l.Nl.8 t.l . . AC-1157 4111111. . Jal uoau . I , REMARKS I ' 1 N UMBER . JU . . . . , -. . . . - All ., . . AC I !57 I 1'f . ~, '= I . "' " , . ' ~ AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ' " FUND,_.==:;;.:.__~_-:-_,DATE, _____ l_._U'M PAYEE PURPOSE . ., . . . . lfllrl.e -- . . . . -.1 . JM .,_ eIAilr , . . Cid n1 lllildft . . ftlll* . a. wuu.a., . .a - . SYMBOL lfl ll . , '". &le 1a1 Illa U Pl a 11 1a1 ' I a 1 . Ua J Ua I Uat Ua a 17, Ma I naa . , J . Ta I 7 J ,. J WARRANT ALLOWED FOR i. i, . ,. . 1* a. . &UM . 11.u . . . . Ml ,. - n.11 . ~1 . . . ,., Ut.ll I ."". .IJ.1.1. u M.11 1.u. .U, . . .1.1.i.e .u . .M .ll 1.1.n u . :a . u.11 M;'l -~~--- . -~. REMARKS , ' . . ' . .--. ---- -- .-.-. -- . --- . ---- -- ' ' . . . . "" , .,. ' 7 J ' - ,.,. ' . ~ "'-" " A.UDITqR'~ WARRANT REGISTER SANT A BARBARA COUNTY , , FUND---------~ATE t \ ' . I, 1t'9 NUMBER PAYEE PURPOSE SYMBOL ALWLOAWRERDA NFTO R REMARKS I. a ., ., . J v lM I u -- Ill a '" ~ . u.1- uUelaaS 1 u 111 at . -- llt. a I . uaa 1 M.t . . .,.,. iaa lal . . , , -- Ua 1 . . 111 I .,. . . ff. t .i.n. 'I - . , ". - 77 a I ' , .n.11. . ,. , u.11 U.M lie a I , . . 17.U Wat .11.1.1.' . - - . 111.11 -- J ,. u. . , AC I !57 , .-J J ' ' NUMBER PAYEE AC-1!57 . - . . y . - "1' ~ . - k .;. , , , . ~ 4.- .,.r1 O ";, l , ' I I \, ~ ;-- AUDITOR'S WARRAN~T REGIS'"PER \'; . .': 1 SANT A BARBAR,A COUNTY' ~ .!?Fi 1 . . ; / ~ I -/ ,. ' FUND ._ ., tlATE------~ PURPOSE SYMBOL aaM \' . . . . eaM uas .ll 8 M ltM M 8.a M . aM MaM . aM Ill. JA Ill t1 1e1 aM lhaM .11 8 M a 14 1R M *" PlaM Uf aM Uta.M ,.,. r ., ' ' . ' l ' WARRANT ALLOWED FOR (l,.,M) . JlM u.u 7 . . . w U.IO ., u.u . 119 . UaM 1 , 2.1 w,.111.,ne 'Us . . .' ~ .' . REMARKS r AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANTA BARBARA COUNTY , FUND .__ ____ _.DATE NUMBER PAYEE PURPOSE SYMBOL WARRANT ALLOWED FOR REMARKS . 1117 II &4 . - l .,. . u. , , . _ . . . . . . - - a.n tlUI .,. . , . sera1 , . , . 111 ULae .a,m_ llldUla . . ,. r . . - . . . .llllllle lll .J Ill J.M 6MI *Al . " ' , . ,. AC-157 . . . N UMBER PAYEE e-atUtll AC- 1157 AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANTA BARBARA COUNTY FUND allCU' ATE 1&11 PURPOSE SYMBOL j . . if - 1970 WARRANT ALLOWED FOR , - REMARKS 28 September 14, 1970 Claims List NUMBER 17 ll&t . - tlll n - ltlf . . . . 1114 . . ., . . lltl lltl . , t . . 1111 llU AC-1157 PAYEE . -ia . -.r . "-" _ - .,. . . , 111 Ciel& a~ . -.i ,,.1._ .--. . eaau ~ fl)' 4J+ ,.( ., . --~ . a.le . , . . SANTA BARBARA COUNTY '-------~DATE PURPOSE . ._ . - . . llld . . - . . . a&M-- SYMBOL I M . 7 au uau 17 a an llaM 11a11 . n '1 a II a 11 . . . ., ., ., . ., J 71 a I WARRANT ALLOWED FOR "'" 74.tl ./.,.} .7.J/ 17.U 111. 111.17 n. . l.M 111 . '' u . u II.ti ., . n.n . Ml . .;. 7- 6'5 """ Ul.71 as. n1.u . 411.ll - 111.11 n. u n. . " REMARKS . - NUMBER ., - , , - . , . ,. ,. ,. ,. -. -. .- , -. , Mii AC-1!57 AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER I . .I , SANT A BARBARA COUNTY FUND ., PAYEE a a.11.te ~ _~./.~- V. . '. PURPOSE ,. ~ . DATE SYMBOL ,. 71 I , lie " l . . - 111 I , . ._ . - * .__. . c.iu . -111ue .-.-. ~ . o.Mlmi . ttrL.,_ . . _ . UlaU . Ulll a II - 197 ' . UJan WARRANT ALLOWED FOR . 1,u1.u . . . . ., Ul.Ja . 111.11 i. . ML w.u . 11 111 m.JA Ul.ll . us . us 117.17 . . REMARKS NL ,_ . . au an 19.41 w . cit l,. . . , NUMBER , ,. , -iiW ., ' . ., .,. ,., ,. . 1719 111 1711 'Ill , lftl . , ,. ,. - . , .-, . .,., ,. n AC I !57 - . ------ . -----------1111111m AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER , SANT A BARBARA COUNTY I t DATE . 14, l17I . , FUND PAYEE . . ~ .-~.-.--. . eDllliil . . . . . Diida. - . ./I.l.l.:.:~. . . - Miilllla9. , PURPOSE . , . ' .,_ . . a&M SYMBOL . n . . DJaU lll a II Iii a . . uta SS Ii Bella WARRANT ALLOWED FOR REMARKS . t . 1 . U. 11 n .a.u It.ti ' . . au . ,. . . . . . Ut 17~ IL a. .*. t. 7 . u. . 111 . ,. Ill a I .M1.1 Ut 1171.11 . .u. . - ., . -- NUMBER ,. ,. .,. ,. .,. .,. ., .,. ,. ,. ., , , Ml ., .,. ., .'".' 1711 , . , .,., . ., . - nu ,. ,., , - -., AC- 1!57 \ \:'.:w ' AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER ' FUND_ PAYEE . llilil ~ . --. -- MIMI - . - . . --*--- . ., _L. a. . . a.tlllrW ._ . _. . - . _.,. . ,. -.w. . -.ua.a . lllUlllla a.-.,. ' ' . SANT A BARBARA COUNTY __,- --~DATE ' -' PURPOSE SYMBOL lit 4o . . ueaa . lll U . . UI all 111 ea iua 1 . . 111au . . 1171 WARRANT ALLOWED FOR . ~n.n . 17.lt YU. . a.u . . . . ., . . . n. . . u . . ' REMARKS au; ~- Ille W ma 11 IA.II I NUMBER - . ,n. .,. .,m,. . . . ,n. . . , .' ,. . ., , -., . , .,., . , . a . AC I !57 . , t I . t AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER .I ' ' FUND PAYEE ' . ' ' ' .,. alMlll ' ." . . ,. . . . , . . -.u . 8llilllllW . - . -- . ?7/:tflC.~v SANT A BARBARA COUNTY L---------'-LJATE PURPOSE \ .~-. \; . , - " . SYMBOL . .-. . .W. 111aua . . . WARRANT ALLOWED FOR 111.so . . Ill.II . ue.- &. , J.11 . . - . ut. . . . . . . . . . . REMARKS .,. I NUMBER . 9M . . , . - . . . . . - . . . . AC-1157 ,. ' . --- \ "~ ,. I . . , "t'IJ~_j.~- AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER ' ' SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ' , ' I r .' .~ : FUND' ._:____,:__________:___.D,ATE ' ' PAYEE "f' .,1 I I . ._ . ., . ~- ._.MUIM . . . . _ . . llllrllll . . .aua. --. . - . . . . . lid . . . PURPOSE I I I 'I ' SYMBOL DJ - ' " - ' WARRANT ._ ALLOWED FOR ' a.a u.u \ ,. 11. ua . .,. ., . UI-. U. ., . . . m.11 ,. . , ., . m. .i ., . u, . m. REMARKS , . NUMBER .' . . . -. . - -, - . . - .- _, . AC 1~7 ' \ , . . . . I I ' . , . ~ AUDITOR'S WARR,A NT REGISTER J FUND PAYEE . - . ~ . . . . u .a . - . _. . . . SANTA BARBARA COUNTY =------~DATE - PURPOSE . . ., SYMBOL uraa ' - aa 11 WARRANT ALLOWED FOR u . . . . . . . ., . ne.u . JLU ., . . . . a n . &.eM . , . aae. L . a. . . l.IU.H . '-"' in. REMARKS . . l.llJ "' NUMBER -, - . - . ., - . -. . , . . HD - AC-1!57 ' ' . ' , AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER PAYEE . - . . . . ~ . . ~ ,. . . ~ __ . .llllUI . SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PURPOSE . _ . . . I SYMBOL iaau . . 21 Ulae ltl a IA - 114 an lMau lMa U 111 at . . utan "' WARRANT ALLOWED FOR .-. ' . . W.70 'IL2' n.- &I.II n.n . . . * . II/I. W . . ., . .n.ia . , .19.0. u . 1.u . u . ., . ' ., . . ., n.11 I REMARKS 1IN1 . NUMBER - , . . ., . au . . . . au .~.'.1.5.'o.2 . - , . AC- 1157 ' , \ AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER ~~ . , SANTA BARBARA COUNTY I FUND ' . PAYEE . . ~ . , . .,._ . . - . . . au,. 'Rv c. (' .:.v llllirMw-AIMa ut PURPOSE . . . . . . SYMBOL .u . . . . lll . wan au u Ill II UlaU UI a 1,1 U7911 - u1,au 1na1 WARRANT ALLOWED FOR '" u. . . u . ~- , - w.u . U.M M.,. i.en. , I.ti u.u U. . u. , . 14.18 llt.11 111 i. , ., w . REMARKS Nit Ut I NUMBER - ' Mil - -- AC 1!57 _, . "'""" ,. I I \ AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANTA BARBARA COUNTY tr' ' FUND -------"JATE PAYE. E PURPOSE SYMBOL ALWLOAWRERDA NFTO R REMARKS 9-1 Ml I -- ,. .-. . \ , - u . - ~ , . n.11 . N . . . &41814 . , , . . a., . NUMBER . -- AC I !17 ., ,.,. ~ , t. I t .f' I ' I ' AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER , FUNDPAYEE .Cll.l.lU. -- ' . . ' SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ' PURPOSE . -====~=----"""''L--.:u=. . SYMBOL WARRANT ALLOWED FOR &- u , Me , . . REMARKS ' j I NUMBER . . AC-1157 . 1~ ' ~ - 1, ~ -- " . . . AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER I J I I t FUND , PAYE,.E - ., I . . SANT A BARBARA COUNTY ---'----'~-JJATE . 14,_ UJO PURPOSE . . SYMBOL , . ., an WA~RANT ALLOWED FOR REMARKS - Ill.al ---- . u '" ,. a.n , ' . . I f ":' .JL.S. _ - ' . ' . . . "' . - m. . ,. . . ,_ NUMBER . , , ,., , 791 7111 . ,. .,., , . ,. ., AC-I !57 . ; ' . - rf.:(;, ,''AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER ,/ SANT A BARBARA COUNTY FUND f t ' I, ---~DATE PAYEE PURPOSE SYMBOL ' . . . \SB -- . . . , . . - . ClillU . . . . . i , . . . -.uu. . . . -- ~--- . - at au . -u . . -'IU . . ~ ' . . WARRANT REMARKS ALLOWED FOR - '-" . i' . ' Ut-.M . .,. . . 1 A6.lS ~- S.Y. it. . . . U/96' 'f u , .u f t .n u. . . . . . I NUMBER. AC-1157 . 'f' . ; . f , \ . , (: . ' . . AUDITOR'S. WARRANT REGISTER ' . FUND . PAYEE . ., SANTA BARBARA COUNTI:'; .r \ _.;; _. - JJA~E . Jt, I UN PURPOSE ' . ' SYMBOL WARRANT ALLOWED FOR m .-.-. - ' . REMARKS -""' . . ' ' . ' 1 I J I " I 1 j i i l AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER , I . I' SANTA BARBARA COUNTY I FUND ______ _ _ _,_,DATE . AC-1!57 - NUMBER _,.,_ ACll57 . . 1 AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER . " I SANT A BARBARA COUNTY FUND _, DATE . JA. PAYEE SYMBOL WARRANT ALLOWED FOR PURPOSE . OS , ,. ' . . ' . . . ' . , . - ~- . . . ' , 11.uy.17 ue., . , . ,. . 71.M M.11 7 ~ ,I Ill.el . &.1M. ~ 17 . ,. ~- . . . . REMARKS 1 ' ' September 14, 1970 carried unanimously, it is ordered that the authorization for Supervisor Daniel G. Grant to sign the argument in favor of the Civil service initiative ordinance to appear on the ballot of the November 3, 1970 General Election be, and the same is hereby, ratified. Easement Deed fro In the Matter of Acceptance of Easement Deed from Leona Wallace on Leona Wallace L/S 11, 005 Donation Basis for Flood Control Purposes, Off-Tract Lot Split #11,005, Folio Flood Control I Lompoc Area Abolish Fire Zone No . 7 / #556, Fifth District. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant; seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Easement Deed, dated September 4, 1970, conveyed on a donation basis for flood control purposes, Off-Tract Lot Split #11,005, Folio #556 be, and the same is hereby, accepted by the County. It is further ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the S. B. County Flood Control & Water Conservation District for acceptance. In the Matter of Recommendation of Administrative Officer from Request of County Fire Chief to Abolish Fire Zone No. 7, Lompoc Area, Fourth District. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject recommendation be, and the same is hereby, confirmed; and the County Counsel be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to prepare the appropriate resolution setting hearing on the matter for adoption by the Board on September 21, 1970. Waller Park- Majes ic In the Matter of Reconmendation of Administrative Officer on Board Re- Area S M r eq prmposal for Street ferral Concerning Proposal for Street Lighting in Waller Park-Majestic Area, Santa Lighting / Schedule for Juvenile Defense Public Def ender Cost of I Maria. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to County Counsel and LAFCO for preparation of the appropriate resolution to be presented to the Board. In the Matter of Reconmendation of Administrative Officer on Cost Schedule for Juvenile Defense, Public Defender. The Administrative Officer submitted a written report and recommendation on subject matter, and indicated that Presiding Superior Court Judge Floyd C. Dodson was in agreement with the recommended schedule. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the recommendation of the Administrative Officer to approve the cost schedule for Juvenile Defense, Public Defender be, and the same is hereby confirmed, as follows: $60.00 $15.00 $10.00 $50.00 For all proceedings, including detention hearing, uncontested, jurisdictional hearing, and disposition hearing. Minimum to be added where counsel appointed in Juvenile Court did not previously represent defendant. To be added for each court appearance resulting only in a continuance. To be added for each half day, or part thereof, for contested 29 30 September 14, 1970 jurisdictional hearing. $15.00 Per hour for research, investigation, and preparation for contested jurisdictional hearing. Travel Requ sts I In the Matter of Approval of Travel Request for Superior Court Judges to Attend Conference September 14-16, 1970. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried, with Supervisor Callahan voting "No", it is ordered that travel from the County of Santa Barbara on County business be, and the same is hereby, approved for Superior Court Judges John T. Rickard, Marion A. Smith, Floyd C. Dodson, Morris J. Stephan, c. Douglas Smith, and John A. Westwick to attend Conference of California Judges between the dates of September 13-16, 1970, on a program for the improvement of the Administration of Justice, Seminars, and the study of law revision Sheriff In the Matter of Request of Sheriff for Additions to Department's 90-C-l AdditiODS t Department ' (Fixed Assets) Budget for FY 1970-71, Equipment Totalling Sum of $2,005, on Emergency Bu~~et for equipm nt Basis. I Welfare Dir report on ~rs . Brown proposal fo employable Welfare Recipients I Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, continued .to September 21, 1970, and referred to the Administrative Officer for reconmendation. ctor In the Matter of Report of Welfare Director from Board Referral of Request / of Mrs. Frank E. Brown on Proposal for Employable Welfare Recipients. The Welfare Director submitted a report on subject matter from Board referral of August 31, 1970, regarding employable Welfare recipients. There are over 16,000 persons receiving categorical aid in the County. Of these, there are 3,000 aged and blind recipients, 1,500 disabled persons, 8,500 children, and 3,000 single parents. Of the 3,000 single parents, approximately 700 are employed and partially support their families. The remainder are unemployed due to various factors. There are 389 unemployed father cases receiving categorical aid who are expected to make reasonable efforts toward employment. In conclusion, it was pointed out that the Welfare Department is cooperating with the Department of Human Resources Development in accordance with all of the regulations pertaining to employable recipients and procedures directed toward their eventual employment. Supervisor Tunnell asked about people now who make their appearance in such a manner so as to keep from being employed, and the Welfare Director said that Monterey County is making a test case on this aspect. Supervisor Tunnell said the matter of people wilfully and knowingly discouraging employment to be eligible for assistance may be a significant thing in this County. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, placed on file, and that Mrs. Brown be notified of the Board's action. It is further ordered that the County Counsel and Welfare Director be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to look into the test case in Monterey County as to the status, and report back to the Board as soon as practicable Exec of Contract County of S B ; Ventura Count Bd of Education & Co Suoerinten dent of Sc 1ools operation of Los Prietos Boy Camp Communications I I State Depart of Parks ~ Recreatio local Grant of 14, 700 for park development I , September 14, 19.70 In the Matter of Execution of Contract between the County of Santa Barbara, County of Ventura, Board of Education " County Super intendent of Schools for Operation of Los Prietos Boys' Camp. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and ' carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: on file. RESOLUTION NO. 70-579 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Communications. / The following comnunications were received by the Board and ordered placed 1 Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors - notice of County delegation to the Legislature to attend meeting September 16, 1970 to hear explanations on tax reform. / State Dept. of Public Health - acceptance of County Health Department allocation proposal for FY 1970-71 ($21",500). 1 CSAC - study of California's lower court system. In the Matter of Communication from State Department of Parks " Recreation on Administration of local Grant Program on Projects Covered by Bond Act of 1964 Allocation of $40,000,000 to the 58 Counties. $14, 700 distributed to Santa Barbara co . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the Parks Department. Endorsement of In the Matter of Resolution of Endorsement of Passage of Proposition 1 at Proposition 1 at November 3, 1970 the November 3, 1970 General Election. General Election 1 Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and Opposition to #1 way imp -ovement t Harrison Grade ~orrespondence re questing Cuyama Valley Law Enfiorc ment Re ''ire rotection { carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO. 70-580 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) ree - In the Matter of Communication from Philip Kerrigan " Elizabeth Carmichael of Lompoc on Local Opposition of California #1 Freeway from Lompoc Wye North toward I ' Santa Maria, Improvement of Harrison Grade. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, placed on file with a copy to be furnished Supervisor Beattie. In the Matter of Request of J. Maxine Smalstig, R. N., Don Maxwell, and -David Bolla -for More Adequate Cuyama Valley Law Enforcement" Fire Protection. , ~ Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, placed on file with a copy to be furnished Supervisor Tunnell 31 September 14, 1970 J LaMorado In the Matter of Invitation of La ~roada Residence or Teen-Age Girls to T Residence f r Attend Auiiliary Barbecue September 27, 1970, at Skofield Park,from 1 P.M. to 4 P .M. een-Age Girls invit annual Barbecue Milpas Lion Club inv' ite luncheon at Porter Hous Restaurant I Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant,' and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Board accepts subject invitation In the Matter of Invitation from Milpas Lions Club To Attend Luncheon at Porter House Restaurant in Santa Barbara on September 15, 1970. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Board accepts subject invitation, with Supervisor Callahan expected to attend. Tract 10, 57 In the Matter of Release of Cortco Company Monwnent Bond for Tract #10,574, releasing Monument Bo d Unit #1 to Hugh B. S.d.mpson, Engineer, in the Cash Amount of $700.00 Per Section to Hugh B. Simpson 11592 of the Business ~ Professions Code. $700 . 00 I Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the reconmendation of the Assistant County Surveyor to release the Cortco Company monwnent bond for Tract #10,574, Unit #1 to Hugh B. Simpson, Engineer, in the cash amount of $700.00 be, and the same is hereby, confirmed, per Section 11592 of the Business Professions Code, inasmuch as the engineer was not paid in full for the setting of the final monwnents within the 90- day period. Uptown Lion In the Matter of Proposal of the Uptown Lions Club of Santa Barbara to Club prooos 1 build Swim- Build Swimming Pool at La Posado Juvenile Hall in the' Near Future. ming Pool La Posqdo Uport motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and Juvenile qa 1 , carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the Probation Officer and Public Works Director for report and recommend- atio n. Rudometkin In the Matter of Communication from Beatrice S. Lane, Roxanne L. Sallace, Property & Dovali Pro- and Alfred Nicolai Regarding Zoning Violations on Rudometkin Property at 1599 W. uerty zonin violations Betteravia Road and Dovali Property on Betteravia Road, Santa Maria, Next to 1521 on Betterav a Rd / Betteravia Road. Los Alamos Fence Award ing Bid for Constructio I Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the County Counsel be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to proceed with the abatement of subject nuisances. ark In the Matter of Awarding Bid for Construction of Los Alamos Park Fence, Los Alamos. The Affidavit of Publication being on file with the Clerk; the following bids were opened at a meeting held on September 3, 1970, in the cierk's office at the Santa Maria County Office Building; the roll was called, and representatives of the following departments were present: Public Works; and J.E. Lewis, Clerk~ : Star Fence Co. $4,266.00 Alcorn Fence Co. 8,645.56 Cyclone Fence 9,247.00. S B Co Administrative C n ter S M Awarding Bid for Constr of Sewer Line Impro ( September 14, 1970 Following referral to the County Counsel and Public Works Director , the Director of Public Works submitted a written report and recommendation to award the contract to Star Fence Company, 2650 Santa Maria Way, Santa Maria, the low bidder. The engineer's estimate was $4,850. It appearing that the bid of Star Fence Company is the lowest and best bid received from a responsible bidder, and that said bid is satisfactory and in accordance with the notice inviting bids for said project; Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the bid of Star Fence Company, in the amount of $4,266.00 be accepted, and that the contract for said project be awarded to the said contractor from Account 52 C 2, at the price and upon the terms and conditions set forth in said bid and in said notice inviting bids It is further ordered that the Director of Public Works be, and he is hereby, auth9rized and directed to prepare the necessary contract f~r the work; and the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute same. In the Matter of Awa~di.ng Bid for Construction of Sewer Line IJllprovements, Santa Barbara County Administrative Center, Santa Maria. The Affidavit of Publication being on file with the Clerk, the following bids were opened at a meeting held on September 3, 1970; the roll was called, and representatives of the following departments were present: Public Works; and J. E Lewis, Clerk: West Coast Construction Co., Inc. $7,156.95 W. M. Lyles Co. 9,045.00 Blois & Cardoza 9,275.00 R. M Vukanovich 9,427.50 Fred Julien & Associates 9,060.95 It was noted that the bid bond for Fred Julien & Associates was not signed Following referral to the County Counsel and Public Works Director, the Director of Public Works submitted a written report and recommendation to award the contract to West Coast Construction Co., ~nc., P. O. Box 1142, San Luis Obispo, California, the low bidder. The engineer's estimate was $10,900.00. It appearing that the bid of West Coast Construction Co., Inc. is the lowest and best bid received from a responsible bidder, and that said bid is satisfactory and in accordance with the notice inviting bids for said project; Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the bid of West Coast Construction Co., Inc., in the amount of $7,156.95 be accepted, and that the contract for said pr oject be awarded to the said contractor from Account 52 C 2 at the price and upon the terms and conditions set forth in said bid, and in said notice inviting bids. It further ordered that the Dir ector of Public Works be, and he is hereby, ~uthorized and directed to prepare the necessary contract for the work; and the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute same 33 / 34 Asphalt Con crete Overl &: Fog Seal cost on Constella ti Rd & Foster Calle Real Awarding Bi for Constr from 0 .24 M E. to 0 . 62 Mi West of Fairview Ave I September 14, 1970 In the Matter of Awarding Bid for Application of Asphalt Concrete Overlay y * Fog Seal cost on Constellation Road (Vandenberg Village) * Foster Road (Orcutt n Wye), Job Nos. L047 .2 * 5038.2. Rd The Affidavit of Publication being on file with the Clerk, the following bids were opened at a meeting held on September 3, 1970; the roll was called, and representatives of the following departments were present: Road Commissioner, County Counsel; and J. E. Lewis, Clerk: A. J. Diani Construction Co. Sully-Miller Co. M. J. Hermreck Co. $11,200.00 11,900.00 12,460.00 Following referral to the County Counsel and Road Commissioner, the Road Commissioner submitted a written report and recommendation to award the contract to A. J. Diani Construction Company, the low bidder. The engineer's estimate was $12,125.00. It appearing that the bid of A. J. Diani Construction Co. is the lowest and best bid received from a responsible bidder, and that said bid is satisfactory and in accordance with the notice inviting bids for said project; Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the bid of A. J. Diani Construction Company, 295 Nort~Blosser Road, Santa Maria, in the amount of $ll~200.00 be accepted, and that the contract for said project be awarded to the said contractor at the price and upon the terms and conditions set forth in said bid and in said notice inviting bids It is further ordered that the Road Commissioner be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to prepa~e the necessary contract for the work; and the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute same. In the matter of Awarding Bid for Construction of Calle Real from 0.24 Mile East to 0.62 Mile West of Fairview Avenue, Job No. 3004.1. The Affidavit of Publication being on file with the Clerk, the following bids were opened at a meeting held on August 27, 1970; the roll was called, and representatives from the following departments were present: Road Commissioner, County Counsel; and J. E. Lewis, Clerk: E. H. Haskell Company C. * J. i.,amhert C. W. Berry Robert R. Nye $161,257.45 168,820.50 169,300.30 192,968.50 Following referral to the County Counsel and Road Commissioner, the Road Commissioner submitted a report with the request to continue subject matter for two weeks due to a delay in relocation of utilities under the Fairview-Calle Real Underground Utilities District. On September 14, 1970, the Road Commissioner submitted a report to award the contract to E. H. Haskell, whose bid of $161,257.45 was the lowest and best bid received from a responsible bidder, and that said bid is satisfactory and in accordance with the notice inviting bids for said project; I Formation of Air Pollution Distr ict Con ' t Hearing I September 14, 1970 Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the bid of E.- H. Haskell Company, in the amount of $161,257 .45 be accepted, and that the contract for said project be awarded to the said contractor at the price and upon the terms and conditions set forth in said bid and in said notice inviting bids. It is further ordered that the Road Commissioner be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to prepare the necessary contract for the work; and the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute same. In the Matte.;: of Continued Hearing on Proposed Formation of Air Pollution Control district in Santa Barbara County. This being the date and time set for the continued hearing on subject proposal; 35 The Administrative Officer's report dated September 14, 1970, was read by the Clerk, recommending the activation of a County-wide air pollution control district, inasmuch as AB 83 has now been passed and signed into law, to take effect 60 days after adjournement of the State Legislature, which means that all areas will be required to be within air pollution control district, and coordinating councils will be created in each air basin to prepare and implement a basin-wide control plan. The effect of this legislation on Santa Barbara Cowity is that if action is not taken to activate a County-wide district, two districts will be created automatically on the date that AB 83 becomes law. Thus, depending npon Board action prior to October, 1970, the County could have either one County-wide district or two districts with the dividing boundary located at the Santa Ynez mountains which s~parates the south coast and south central coast air basins. The Administrative Officer had inquired of the State Air Resources Board whether the State would consider a request to change the boundary between the two air basins so that Santa Barbara County would be entirely within the South Central Coast Air Basin, but no response to this inquiry has been received to date Following the formation of district or districts, the budget shall have to . . be refined to reflect the changed tequirements; the responsibility and organizational position must be fixed; and a committee selected to formulate rules and regulations It was pointed out that as long as the County remains in two air basins and with the basin-wide plans required under the terms of AB 83, there may well be two sets of requirements . Supervisor Tunnell asked if there was a single County district, could there be different rules and regulations for different portions of the County, and the Administrative Officer replied that the County would have to comply with the standards that are established by the South Coast Air Basin south of Gaviota, and the northern part would have to comply with the standards of the South Central Coast Air Basin. The following persons appeared and made statements: Elwin Mussell, member of the Santa Barbara City Cowisel and secretary of the S. B. County Range Improvement Association a member for 15 years, said the Range Association works very closely with the County, especially the Fire Department, and is highly in favor of a district 36 AIR Polluti Distr ict Fonnation Resolution Creating Appointment of Coordina '":ouncil ?-lem to Formula.t Rules and Re ~ula t ions fo r Ooeratio Co - Wide Air Polluaton District / September 14, 1970 in the County. William Denneen, Member of the Santa Maria Pollution Reduction Team, showed several display maps in color, and said there is the need to do something in this County for stationary ' sources of pollution, and went into details on the charts on the screen. He mentioned burning at the County dump and the build up of a ''PCB'' chemical. With regard to controlled burning, Supervisor Tunnell said some of them had met with people in San Luis Obispo last Friday and they have a committee working on rules and regulations now which are rather stringent but not adopted as yet. There are a lot of ramifications. He is in favor of the northern part of the County being associated with San Luis Obispo area. It would make more sense as they have more in conmon with .them on air pollution. Dr. Sidney R. Frank spoke on agricultural burning, and the problems involved. Fire Chief May of the City of Santa Barbara - he would like to have a fire service member from the City in on the rules and regulations as they are being considered. Robert Hunt, Secretary of the Santa Barbara County Farm Bureau - they feel having a district in this County would be most satisfactory. Various co1I111unications were received by the Board in favor of the formation of a district and in opposition, which were filed as a matter of record. The Clerk read a letter from the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors inviting the Board to attend a luncheon on September 25, 1970, at 11 A. M. in San I Bernardino, Board of Supervisors Conference Room, 175 West Fifth Street, San Bernardino, t o dis cuss establishment of a basin-wide Air Pollution Control Coordinating Council . . . ' - - . - - . I ,. ' ~- - . There being no further appearances or written statements submitted for or against subject proposal; Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted to create a Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District, as reconmended by the Administrative Officer: RESOLUIION NO. 70-581 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT Fll.E) In the Matter of Proposed Appointment of Coordinating Council Members to ing rs Formulate Rules and Regulations for Operation of County-Wide Air Pollution Control District in Santa Barbara. The Administrative Officer indicated the necessity of proceeding on subject matter to carry out the requirements of AB 83. One of the Board members would be required to be appointed as a member, and if there are two air basins, the representative designated for the south coast air basin would be from the first, second or third district; and the member from the south central coast air basin would be from the third, fourth or fifth district. Also, it was suggested that members ---- ~-------------.-------------------------------------------------------- Sheriff' s Benefit &. Relief Assoc req for Wa~e & Benefit Considera I ,. September 14, 1970 would be appointed such as the Admin.i strative Officer, County Counsel, Fire Department, Health Officer, County Farm Bureau, S. B. County Range Improvement Association, - - Public Works, each city in the County, County Taxpayers Association, or one from industry. Robert Curiel Assistant County Counsel, pointed out the consideration of the appointment of a hearing board following formation of the District - a 3-man board to hear appeals on variances, etc. Two members will be lawyers and one member an engi neer. It is further ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, continued to Monday, September 21, 1970, .for further consideration by the Board. The Chairman declared that the regular meeting of Monday, September 14, 1970 be, and the same is hereby, duly and regularly continued to Tuesday, September 15, 1970, at 2 o'clock, p.m. ' ' Board, of SuEervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California, September 15, 1970, at 2 o'clock, . p .M. Present: Supervisors George H. Clyde, Joe J. Callahan, J Daniel 'G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell; and J. E. Lewis, Clerk. In the Matter of Request of Sheriff's Benefit - Relief Association for Wage and ~enefit Consideration. ion R. D. Johnson, Administrative Officer, read from his letter dated September . 15, 1970, on the subject of salary reconnnendations for Sheriff's Department which stated that, in accordance with Board direction, he and other County representatives, as designated by the Board, met with the Sheriff's Benefit - Relief Association I officers and the counsel to discuss salary recon:n:nendations for law enforcement - personnel. The meeting was convened in the Board of Supervisors Conference Room at 7:30 P.M. on Monday, September 14, 1970. On the basis of the existing salary survey policy, the following data have been used to arrive at the recon:n:nended adjustment to be effective January 1, 1971: County Orange San Bernardino Deputy Sheriff Salary Range 797-940 731-887 (plus 10% for O.T. for those who qualify) !Uyerside Fresno Ventura Kern Monterey San Lu.is Obispo Santa Barbara (curr ent) Recon:n:nendation based on above data 754-937 721-876 - 757-920 760-923 764-929 685-851 734-884 690-839 761-925 . I 3? 38 September 14, 1970 In comparison of the entry salaries, it should be noted that only the Counties of Orange and Kern offer a higher salary. - from these data, the Administrative Officer concluded that the law enforcement classifications in the Sheriff's Department should be increased 10% effective January 1, 1971. He has advised the representatives of the Sheriff's Benefit ~ Relief Association that he plans to make these recommendations to the Board of Supervisors as a part of his salary recommendations to be submitted in November, 1970. that evening The Association representatives left the meeting,/statingtliat they would respond to this at the meeting at 2 p.m. today. Attorney Allan S. Ghitterman, counsel for the Sheriff's Benefit ~ Relief Association, stated that the Administrative Officer's ideas do not conform to his understanding of what happened at last night's meeting. He was surprised to discover that the Board had asked Mr. J ohnson to meet with them and discuss only one of the many problems they had submJ.tted to the Board. When asked how he reached the 10% level, he said Mr. Johnson said he averaged the pay for deputy only . Based on that average, he determined that the increase of 10% was justified, and the Association takes exception to that. Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Sergeant has a pay range of $799-971, and Orange County has a starting salary for Sergeant $20 higher; the lowest pay for a Sergeant is $20 more than the pay for a Sergeant here. This disparity follows all through the pay scales and the Association has a continuing, unjustified variance. When all pay scales are added together, they have about 10-20% disparity. A 15% increase across the Board average would justify the pay for all of them,he said. The Association representatives had gone to the meeting last night in good faith to negotiate their proposals with the Board of Supervisors, but they were told by Mr.Johnson that the Board had directed him not to enter into any negotiations with the Association representatiyes but only to tell them what his salary position was. They tried to explore all o~ the other proposals, but all of these efforts were rejected. However, they did talk about uniform allowance. Educational incentive and overtime pay were not even discussed. Mr. johnson said the pay scale would start January 1, 1971, but this would be very unfair because they are always six months behind. The 15% for the first six months would be satisfactory but the r est of the year would reflect an average or below average. Again, he reiterated that the men should be entitled to a living wage scale. They stand prepared at any time to enter into negotiations with the Board on all of their proposals. They are very reluctant to walk out on Thursday but there is no choice. These demands have been submitted to the Board many times, and they must be resolved. The Association is having a meeting this evening at 7 p.m. They see no change but to walk out absent some change in the Board's position. President DaFoe read a letter addressed to him from the Sheriff's clerical personnel, supporting the cause 100% as indicated by their signatures. He said law enforcement is a profession not just another County department. There is no way to . make a valid comparison of the Sheriff's people with any kind of County department. 17;1/2% of the County Sheriff's personnel have more than five years of experience, and there is an unbelievable turnover. The cost to recruit and train personnel is . tremendous, and a waste to the taxpayers. They have kept in touch with most of them / - September 14, 1970 who have left the department and over 75% have gone into law e nforcement departments elsewhere, so the County cost t o train personnel and leave benefits the other counties, not Santa Barbara, yet Santa Barbara bears the cost. R. D. Johnson, Administrative Officer, made a rebuttal to Attorney Ghitterman' s statement. He said that last evening when he asked for a justification of the, I Association's position with r egard to their demand for a 15% increase, this was ex- ' planned and this is not consistent with the salary survey approach that is the established policy of this County. He had pointed out to them that if this increase were granted, this would place Santa Barbara at a higher salary figure than any of the other comparable -agencies. On the turnover rate, records of the Personnel office reveal a turnover rate for the Sheriff's Department of one-half the turnover rate for the whole County. Attorney Ghitterman said they are not getting adequate wages and this must be corrected and justified. The pay scale .for patrolman will be higher than any of the other comparable agencies with the 15% increase but only fp r :s ix months - what happens between July and January? He filed copies of the wage scales for the eight comparable counties with the Cler~. . . Supervisor Callahan asked if this 15% increase would apply for Deputy Sheriff only, and Mr. Johnson replied that as administration sees it, the 10%' which is indicated is based upon the salaries for the class of Deputy Sheriff and in order to maintain operation, they would have to provide this amount of adjustment for all levels of the law enforcement series. Administration has been ahead of schedule and expect~o get further review of command levels because this is a part of the . salary survey that is not completed as yet. The Board recessed at 2:25 o'clock, p.m. to meet in Executive Session, and reconvened .at 3:20 o'clock, p.m.; and the roll was called. I Present: Supervisors George H. Clyde, Joe J. Callahan, Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell; and J. E. Lewis, Clerk. I Supervisor Clyde in the Chair Chairman Clyde announced that the Board has been. in Executive Session discussing the requests of the Sheriff's Benefit * Relief Association, and has . directed the Administrative Officer, Director of Personnel, and County Counsel to meet and confer with representat~ves of the. Association to discuss recounnendations to be made to the Board of Supervisors concerning requests of the Association, with a report to be made before the Board of Supervisors this afternoon at 4:30 p.m. The Board recessed at 3:30 o'clock, p.m., and reconvened at 4:30 o'clock, p.m.; and the roll was called. Present: Supervisors George H. Clyde, Joe J. Callahan, Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell; and J. E. Lewis, Clerk Supervisor Clyde in the Chair 39 40 Sheriff ' s Be & Relief Ass req for Wa~e and Benefit Consideratio I ' , September 14, 1970 The Administrative office requested the Board's indulgence to further continue the meeting of September 14, 1970, until 2 p.m. Wednesday, September 16 , 1970, in order to afford the negotiating committee additional time in which to . negotiate. The Chairman declared that the regular meeting of September 14, 1970 be, and the same is hereby, duly and regularly continued to Wednesday, September 15, 1970, at 2 o'clock, p.m. Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California, Wednesday, September 16, 1970, at 2 o'clock, p.m. Present: Supervisors George H. Clyde, Joe J. Callahan, ~ Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell; and J. E. Lewis, Clerk Supervisor Clyde in the Chair efit In the Matter of Request of Sheriff's Benefit * Relief Association for c Wage and Benefit Consideration. The Chairman announced that the Board will first hear a report from the Administrative Officer resulting from the discussion with the representatives of the Sheriff's Benefit * Relief Association. The Administrative Officer, R. D. Johnson, read from his letter addressed to the Board, dated September 16; 1970. He stated that, as directed by the Board, they have met and conferred with representatives of the Sheriff's Benefit * Relief Association, and have discussed salaries and fringe benefits. As a result of these meetings, the County staff has agreed to base recommendations upon salaries and employee benefits that are currently in effect in tqe eight counties identified in the G-K survey. They have mutually considered and discussed each of the points set forth in the Association's letter dated September 2, 1970, with enclosures. On the . basis of the data used for administration's survey, they are recommending, effective January 1, 1971, a 10% salary increase for the class of Deputy Sheriff and 121/2% for all other classes of sworn personnel up to and including the rank of Inspector. They are also recommending that the uniform maintenance allowance be set at $4.50 per bi-weekly pay period. In the matter of overtime, they are recommending a change fr' om the existing policy to privide that during declared emergencies, all sworn personnel up to and including the rank of Inspector should be compensated for overtime , in cash at the rate of time. and one-half. As a further matter, they have agreed to recommend that future salary adjustments be made effective July 1, 1971. The Sheriff's Benefit *Relief Association did not see fit to accept these recommendations, and terminated the discussions shortly before 12:00 noon. Mr. Johnson stated that the salary adjustment date in the future recommended for July 1, 1971 would include all County personnel. However, administration has not had time to discuss this matter with other employee groups, and will schedule I ' September 14, 1970 meetings to discuss this. Salary adjustments would be made in January, 1971 and again on July 1, 1971, for all empioyees. , Attorney Ghittermarireiterated statements made to the Board earlier about meeting to negotiate and discuss the Association's terms but there has been no negotiation. They had presented to Mr. Johnson the act that they had asked for a 15% wage increase for January 1, 1971, to be carried forward to July 1, when they would expect some adjustment which would keeu them at the average level of the eight counties, but were unable to reach an agreement on that except the principle of how the adjustment would be made in July. If it is fair on January 1, there appears to be no legitimate reason why it should not be fair today. He proceeded to show pay scale charts on the screen, with comparison of other counties, showing that as of July 1, Santa Barbara County was 10% below the average so something must be done for the 6-month period. To be exactly fair, the Board would have to give 20% increase on January 1, but the Association is only asking for 15%. It appears to be a policy of the Board to grant half of the back log. It is unacceptable that this policy be continued and that is part of the reason for their opposition. The adjustment date should be the same as all the other counties as long as we are tied to the eight-county sample. In computing the difference between the 10% and 15% increase, it was found that the cost to the County would be less than one cent on the tax roll, or less than $40 ,000. The uniform allowanceisfair, he said; and there is a problem about the bi-weekly pay period but this can be taken up later. On over time, it is trivial to limit coumand personnel to overtime in declared emer gencies because they so rarely I get involved in other situations. There is nothing on educational incen~ive pay or longevity. They ar e willing to give up their request on educational incentive pay to get the 15% increase. On longevity, something should be done for the 17-1/2% of service to retain their services instead of losing them to other counties. It would cost the County about $15,000 which is only one quarter of one cent on the tax roll. Mr. Burdick reappeared before the Board to emphasize the point that he is impressed that the negotiations that took place yesterday and this morning wer e meaningful and substantial negotiation.s, and an improvement in the ''climate''. Agreement has been reached on the most fundamental problem that was facing everyone - what is an acceptable formula and is a reasonable and legitimate way of applying that Everyone should be congratulated for having solved this very fundamental problem, as it will mean a great deal in the future in this coumunity and result in very meaningful benefits. The ''hangup'' lies in the question of whether or not there is a Board policy which prevents in full the application of that agreed upon formula as of right now. The Board's representative (Administrative Officer) feels constrained by an existing Board policy that says adjustments are made in January. He is willing to recoumend an increase to put the deputies on the level of equality with the eight counties January 1, 1971, but he feels powerless to arrive at a figure that would make it effective today. Mr . Johnson should be relieved of this constraint and if the Board feels that it is fair and reasonable in January, that the Board permit it to be applied today. If that is accomplished, the very few remaining issues that r emain in the negotiations can be $traightened out this afternoon ~1 42 September 14, 1970 Mr. Burdick requested the Board to look at it from that standpoint as being a reasonable, fair and sound approach. Supervisor Tunnell mentioned that the Board was given an ultimatum on Monday that settlement must be reached by Thursday at 2 p.m. or the Sheriff's people would walk out. Some progress has been made and some points resolved. He indicated the Association was still willing and anxious to negotiate and work together in an attempt to resolve the remaining problems. He asked Attorney Ghitterman if the Association has rejected out-right the recommendation of the Administrative Officer, and that the ultimatum is still on about walking out tommorrow unless the Associatiorls wishes are met. Attorney Ghitterman replied that they are here to negotiate and talk about this and get it straightened out - resolve their problems. Tomorrow is another day and they will cross that bridge when they get to it. The Association Board has the membership support. Supervisor Tunnell contended that it is one thing to negotiate in good faith on both sizes, but it is a little different to work under threat of a deadline and threat of a walk out by the Sheriff's Department in this County with unknown consequences. This makes it different as public safety in this county is being dealt with in times of uncertainty with trouble spots around the county. This Board is trying to be fair, honest and sincere to work out some very important personnel problems. Mr. Burdick reappeared with regard to the continuation of the negotiations in the hope that the walk out can be averted. He indicated that the Sheriff's personnel do not want this Board to arrive at any decision that is not reasonable. The background is that the problem is not in a sense of a threat but a sense that these men have virtually exhausted every avenue of assistance . Supervisor Callahan asked if the strike could be called off now for tomorrow ahd Attorney Ghitterman said they have a meeting at 7 p.m. tonight. The Association will present the package tonight in the most favorable light. The Board r ecessed at 2:40 o'clock, p.m., to meet in Executive Session, and reconvened at 3:25 p.m.; and the roll was called. Present: Supervisors Joe J. Callahan, Daniel G. Gr ant, Francis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell; and J. E. Lewis, Clerk. Absent: Supervisor George H. Clyde Supervisor Callahan as Vice-Chairman Vice-Chairman Callahan announced that the Board of Supervisors has reviewed and studied the recommendations of the Administrative Officer, and has directed him to meet again with the Association representatives for further discussion and report back to the Board at 4:30 o'clock, p.m. The Board recessed at 3:30 o'clock, p.m., to reconvene at 4:30 o'clock, p.m. At 4:30 o'clock, p.m., the Board reconvened, and the roll was called. ' ' - - - - - ------------,-----------~-------------------------------------- ' September 14, 1970 Present: Joe J. Callahan, Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, and Cur tis Tunnell; and J. E. Lewis, Clerk. Absent: George H. Clyde. - . Supervisor Callahan as Vice-Chairman R. D. Johnson, the Administrative Officer, report~d that after meeting again with representatives of the Sheriff's Association, and further examining and reviewing the data on which his reconmendations were made, he proceeded to make the following recommendations: 1) That effective January 1, 1971, the sworn officers and deputy sheriffs through the rank of and including Inspector be granted a 12-1/2% salary increase. Also effective January 1, 1971, to establish a rate of $4.50 for uniform maintenance allowance under a bi-weekly payroll system, or $io.oo per month on the present monthly payroll system. 2) That on overtime policy, recommendation for a change from the existing policy that during, declared emergency ,all-.sworn personnel up to and including the position of Inspector be compensated for overtime, in cash, at the rate of one and one-half times. 3) That on salary adjustments, the new date be set effective July 1, 1971, Attorney Ghitterman stated that following the proposal submitted by the Administrative Officer, the Association Board of Directors in caucus voted three to two, a majority, to reject the proposal of the Ad.minis trative Officer. There-will be an Association meeting at 7 p.m. this evening. Attorney Ghitterman I expressed the hope that the Board would retire now in Executive Session and further negotiate and try to resolve the problems. The proposal, as read by the Administrative Officer, will be presented and read to those present tonight at the Association meeting. He indicated they a r e willing to negotiate right up to the 7 p.m. meeting time. Supervisor Callahan asked if they would be willing to continue negotiations until next Monday, and Attorney Ghitterman replied that he can only submit this reconmendation to the membership tonight. Supervisor Tunnell asked for a comment as to whether or not the Association will be able to lift the strike as some of the Board members have commitments to be out of town tomorrow. He wondered if the Association would have their position lowered by extending the strike deadline for a few days beyond tomorrow, and Attorney Ghitterm.an said the Association has made its position clear . Association Board members held a caucus for five minutes and the Board resumed its meeting. Attorney Ghitterman announced that the Board will recommend to the Association that the dead line be postponed from Thursday at 2 p.m. to Monday at midnight - at the Association meeting tonight, and by 7:30 p.m. tonight, they will advise Mr. Johnson whether or not the Association accepts or rejects his recommendation. If the recommendation is accepted, they will come in and negotiate again or come back to t ry to negotiate through-out the night to gain a resolution. If they reject the recommendation to postpone the deadline, they will be back here this evening so that they can commence negotiating again and try to reach some conclusion and will 43 - 44 September 14, 1970 I be back here this evening so that they can commence negotiating again and try to reach some conclusion and will continue to negotiate as long as it is deemed necessary. Supervisor Beattie said he felt the recommendation of the Administrative Officer was very fair for the Sheriff's Department and that the Board has acted in good faith. Attorney Ghitterman pointed out that the Association meeting tonight is designed to deal with the question of whether or not the strike deadline should be postponed until Monday at midnight. If the Association accepts this recommendation, this will enable them to meet further with administration perhaps so they can present a unanimous recounnendation from ther Board. He reiterated that his Association Board voted three to two against the Administrative Officer's recommendation. If they submit that to the Association tonight and it is turned down, there is no . purpose i n a postponement. The Board recessed at 5:20 o'clock, p.m. to meet in Executive Session, and reconvened at 5:30 o'clock, p.m., and the roll was called. Present: Supervisors Joe J. Callahan, Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell. Absent: George H. Clyde. Supervisor Callahan as Vice-Chairman Vice-Chairman Callahan announced that the Board requests a delay in the strike deadline until Monday, September 21, 1970, at midnight, and that the meeting will be adjourned to Monday, September 21, 1970, at 9:30 o'clock, a.m. Attorney Ghitterman inquired if is understood from that statement that the Board has given new direction and new instructions with the Administrative Officer as a negotiating team, and Vice-Chairman Callahan replied that the Association people can continue to negotiate; the Board of Supervisors has not given Mr. Johnson, the Administrative Officer, any new instructions other than the recommendation that was submitted earlier. Attorney Ghitterman said that if no new directions have been given the Administrative Officer, it would be pointless to make any extension of the deadline on the atrike to Monday at midnight.; they will just submit the split recommendation of the Association Board of Directors on the Administrative Officer's recommendation, and not consider the strike deadline extension. Vice-Chairman Callahan stated that the BQard of Supervisors decided in ' Executive Session that its members request the Association to delay the strike deadline to next Monday at midnight and adjourn this Board meeting to the next regular meeting time on Monday, September 21, 1970, at 9:30 o'clock, a.m. Attorney Ghitterman stated, in closing, that .if the Association membership accepts the County's recounnendation, there will be no problem tomorrow; if they don't, there will be trouble. ' t . ~--------~--------~-------------------------------------------- September 14, 1970 Upon motion the Board adjourned sine die The foregoing minutes are hereby approved. , rman, ATTEST: ' LEWIS ourtty Clerk BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA STATE OF CALIFORNIA CALL FOR A SPECIAL MEETING Section 54956 - Government Code - We, the undersigned members of the Board of Supervisors .of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California, believing that the interests of the County require that a special meeting of the Board of Supervisors be called to attend thereto. It is ordered that a special meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California, be and the same is hereby called for September 18, 1970, at 9:30 o'clock, a.m., in the meeting room of said Board, Court House, Santa Barbara, California. The following is the business to be transacted at said meeting, to-wit: Report of Admin In the Matter of the Report of the Administrative Officer on the Strike Officer on the Strike of the of the Deputy Sheriffs and Related Matters. De outy Sheriffs & Related Matt ers I Dated September 18, 1970 s I JOE J ft CAI .I .AHAN Board of Supervisors of the County s/ CURTIS TlINNE[J. of Santa Barbara, State of California s I DANIEJ. G. GRANT Date of Service of Notice to s/ FRANCIS H. BEATTIE Board Members September 18, 1970 . Date of Service of Notice to ' Newspaper September 18, 1970 45 46 , . ' In the Matt r Repo r t of September 14, 1970 Present: Supervisors Joe J. Call~han, Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell; and J. E. Lewis, Clerk. Absent: Supervisor George H. Clyde Supervisor Callahan as Vice-Chairman In the Matter of Report of the Administrative Officer on the Admin Offic r~ Strike of the Deputy Sheriffs and Related Matters. on Str ike o the Deouty Sheriffs an R. D. Johnson, Administrative Officer, read from a prepared Related Mat err eport that, after many hours of negotiation with the Sheriff's Benefit and Relief ~ Association, and in conjunction with the California State Board of Conciliation Service, the County representatives and the Sheriff's Benefit and Relief Association representatives met until 4:00 A.M. this morning to prepare a memorandum of understanding, which is jointly recommended to the Board of Supervisors for consideration. The points of this memorandum are as shown on the attached sheets. Mr. Johnson introduced Mr. Louis Gilbert from the California State Conciliation Service, who proved to be a very fine, effective person to preside over the meeting on negotiations last evening. The following points of memorandum of understanding were outlined, as follows: 1) 12-1/2% salary increase for all ranks, except Sheriff and Undersheriff, effective December 1, 1970. 2) A new review date for salaries for any adjustments to be effective July 1, 1971, using the mean data of the eight-county sample. 3) Uniform allowance of $4.50 per bi-weekly pay period or $10 per month until the bi-weekly payroll system is implemented. This change to be . effective January 1, 1971. 4) Extension of the overtime policy for all ranks except Inspectors and command officers of the administrative and technical division, except during declared emergencies when the overtime policy will apply. 5) Educational incentive to be adjusted to read as follows: 2-1/2% for Intermediate P.O.S.T. certificate or A.A. degree with additional 2-1/2% for 30 additional semester units in specific fields. 7-1/2% for a bachelor's degree or advanced P.O.S.T. certificate, plus an additional 2-1/2% for 30 additional semester units in specified fields to be effective January 1, 1971 . 6) Application of the vacation plan as worked out ~ith the Santa Barbara County Employees Association, which will basically be as follows: 12 working days per year for the first four years; 15 working days per year for the 5th through the 14th year; 20 working days per year for 15 or more years of service. This policy to be effective January 1, 1971. 7) A withdrawal of all law suits, no punitive actions to be taken against the deputies and other officers and the use of compensatory, holiday or accrued vacation to be e l igible for use during a period of absence, since 2 p.m. on Thursday, September 17, 1970. September 18, 1970 Mr. Johnson reported that one of the elements of this recommendation (accelerated vacation schedule) was something which was negotiated with the S. B. County Employees Association and something upon which they have prepared a memorandum of understanding which had been intended to be presented at a later date. It has been under a long period of study with the Employees Association and it deserves credit for a lot of work on this particular fringe benefit modification which is being recommended. He found that this particular element of change in fringe benefits aided them materially in working out a satisfactory agreement with the Sheriff's Benefit and Relief Association. Mr. Johnson said that this morning this memorandum of understanding was agreed upon that the members of the Sheriff's Association Board unanimously voted to support this agreement and will take it back to the Association membership and encourage its adoption and everybody informed that the membership vote has been to agree to the terms of the agreement. In closing, Mr. Johnson requested the Board to adopt these conditions and allow the strike to be terminated and the men in the Sheriff's Department return to their jobs. Supervisor Beattie requested the Board to recess to meet in Executive Session as he had not seen these recommended conditions before that were presented by the Administrative Officer. Mr. Johnson elaborated on the fact that what has been proposed here on the philosophy and implementation of this would extend to all County employees and departments and administration would propose that the salary adjustment and survey be completed so it would be presented for Board consideration to also become effective December 1, 1970. President DaFoe indicated he is in concurrence with the Administrative Officer and has a statement to read following the Board's decision. The Board recessed at 9:50 a.m. to meet in Executive Session, and reconvened at 11:08 a.m., and the roll was called. Present: Supervisors Joe J. Callahan, Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell; and J. E. Lewis, Clerk. Supervisor Callah~n as Vice-Chairman Vice-Chairman Callahan announced that in view of the fact that Chairman Clyde is in the hospital undergoing minor surgery since yesterday, it is deemed advisable that the Administrative Officer and Director of Personnel contact him and explain to him fully the recormnendations that the Administrative Officer has made to the four members of the Board of Supervisors this morning, and the Board will recess until 1:30 p.m. to get a reaction to the recommendations that has been made from Chairman Clyde. The Board recessed at 11:10 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. 47 48 September 18, 1970 At 1:30 p.m., the Board reconvened and the roll was called. Present: Supervisors Joe J. Callahan, Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell; and J. E. Lewis, Clerk. -- Absent: Supervisor George H. Clyde. Supervisor Callahan as Vice-Chairman Vice-Chairman Callahan asked for a report from the Administrative Officer's visit with Chairman Clyde, and the Administrative Officer indicated he would submit his report in Executive Session. The Bocg-d recessed to meet in_E~~tive Session, and reconvened at 1:40 p.m., and the roll was called. Present: Supervisors Joe J. Callahan, Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell, and J. E. Lewis , Clerk-. Absent: Supervisor George H. Clyde Supervisor Callahan as Vice-Chairman Vice-Chairman Callahan announced that the Board has received the recoDDilendation of Chairman Clyde who is in the hospital, and requested the Administrative Officer to again read the conditions that have been submitted to the Board for consideration and approval, and the Administrative Officer proceeded to again read the seven conditions. Mr. Johnson said that is the agreement that administration has reached with the Sheriff s Benefit " Relief Association. He understands the membership.:has approved these terms. Mr. Johnson stated that Chairman Clyde agreed with the complete list of conditions. President John DaFo~ said the membership of the Sheriff's Benefit " Relief Association has voted to accept the l,.isted conditions in a near-unanimous action. The list of conditions were received by them this morning at 9:30 a.m. from the Administrative Officer, they have been considered fully, and the Association endorses them fully. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the recomnendation of the Administrative Officer to accept the seven conditions, as hereinabove-indicated be, and the same is hereby, confirmed; and County staff take the necessary action to implement these provi s i ons. President John DaFoe proceeded to read from a prepared statement. He stated they realize they put the Board and County in an extremely pr-ecarious and awkward position, but after much though, they were compelled to take this reluctant stand. He expressed appreciation for the sincere effort made to resolve the problems. He commended the Administrative Officer for his recoDDilendations, the Assistant Administrative Officer, Paul Floyd, Director of Personnel, Wilbur Wagstaff, Approval of Minute September 18, 1970 ' Assistant County Counsel Robert Curiel as well as Mr. Gilbert from the California State Conciliation Board. Vice-Chairman Callahan said that the Board members deserve some thanks as a team for their patience exercised in keeping the negotiations open to resolve this problem as long as they possibly could. He hoped that out of all this harmony will prevail. Supervisor Beattie thanked the administrative staff for their efforts in bringing this problem to an end, and coonn.ended the Coonn.ittee from the Sheriff's Association who conferred with them. And the Board has a right to expect a day's work for a day's pay. Supervisor Tunnell endorsed the remarks made by the other Supervisors. However, he regretted very much that Santa Barbara County has achieved the very doubtful distinction of having the first Sheriff's Department in the State,walk off their jobs. Supervisor Grant expressed appreciation for the assistance rendered by Mr. Gilbert. . . . Upon motion the Board adjourned sine die. The foregoing Minutes are hereby approved. G GE H. E, Chair;man, Board of pervisors ' I LEWIS, Coun Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, State of ~!!_fornia, Septe~er 21, 1970, at 9:30 o'clock, a.m. Present: Supervisors Joe J. Callahan, Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell; . and J. E. Lewis, Clerk-. Absent: Supervisor George H. Clyde Vice Chairman Callahan in the Chair In the Matter of Approval of Minutes of September 14, 1970 Meeting. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the reading of the minutes of September 14, 1970 meeting be dispensed with and approved without reading 49 50 Goleta Union School Dist Negotiable / Notes (7) $700, 000. Solvang Scho 1 District 1 Ne~otiable I Note $60, 000 September 21, 1970 In the Matter of Issuance of Seven Negotiable Notes of Goleta Union School District for Aggregate Amount of $700,000.00. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO. 70-582 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) I In the Matter of Issuance of One Negotiable Note of Solvang School District, 1 for $60,000.00. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO. 70-583 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) Condemnation of Ethel r Proctor, et SBCC 89570 dismissed In the Matter of Resolution Authorizing County Counsel to Dismiss Condem- 1 nation Action against Ethel Proctor, et al, on Real Property for Ro~d Purposes (Parcels 1 ~ 2, Elwood Acres No. 2, S.B.S.C. #89570). Execution of 1 year leas7 Agreem' t William E. MCCul l ough , et ux Probation Dept Office Space Disollution of Special Fire Pro1 tection Zone No . 7 Upon motion of .Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO. 70-584 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) I n the Matter of Execution of One-Year Lease Agreement between the County and William E. McCullough, et ux, for Probation Dept. Office Space at 1006 Anacapa Street, Santa Barbara, at $700.00 per month, Commencing September 15, 1970. Upon motion of .Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute a one-year lease agreement between the County of Santa Barbara and William E. McCullough, et ux, for Probation Dept. Office space at 1006 Anacapa tember 15, 1970. Street, Santa Barbara, at $700.00 per month, commencing Sep- It is further ordered that the Auditor be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to draw the necessary warrants for the rental payments in the amount of $700.00 per.month in favor of William E. McCullough and Gertrude E. McCullough, c/o Beaver-Free Corporation, P. O. Box 1268, Santa Barbara, Calif. 93102, Attention of Mr. James L. Free, Jr. Said warrants should be drawn upon submission of the Demand of Payment form, as submitted by the Lessors, each and every month. In the Matter of Declaring the Intention of the Board of Supervisors to Abolish Special Fire Protection Zone No. 7 in the Santa Barbara County Fire Protection District (Vandenberg-Mission Hill s Area). Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO. 70-585 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) Apnointment of Election Of fi~ers & Designating Pollin~ Places for Nov 3, 1970 Gen ' l Election I September 21, 1970 In the Matter of Appointment of Ele. ction Officers and Designating Polling Places for November 3, 1970 General Election. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and . carried unanimously, it is ordered that the above-entitled matter be, and the same is hereby, continued to Monday, September 28, 1970. Amendment of cont r ct In the Matter of Amendment of Contract with MacDonald Corporation, General MacDonald ~orpora on Santa Maria Public Contractors for Construction of Santa Maria Public Health Center, 900 West Foster Heal th Center / Plans and Specs Tor o 'Janyon Par I Rd., Santa Maria, Santa Barbara County, California, Project 460 HC. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO. 70-586 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Approval of Plans and Specifications for Construction of Comfort Station #1, Toro Canyon Park, Santa Barbara County, California. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the plans and specifications for construction of Comfort Station #1, Toro Canyon Park, Santa Barbara County, California, be, and they are hereby, approved. . It is further ordered that bids be received for said project on or before October 15, 1970, at 3 o'clock, p.m., and that the advertisement for bids to be published in the Santa Barbara News-Press, a newspaper of general circulation, as follows, to-wit: NOTICE TO BIDDERS NOTICE is hereby given that the County of Santa Barbara will receive bids for - ''Comfort Station No. 1, Toro Canyon Park, Santa Barbara County, California'' Each bid will be in accordance with drawings and specifications approved by the Board of Supervisors and on file in the OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, COUNTY ENGINEERING BUll.DING, 123 EAST ANAPAMU STREET, SANTA BARBARA, CALIFORNIA, WHERE THEY MAY BE EXAMINED AND COPIES SECURED BY PROSPECTIVE BIDDERS Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California (Amended by Statutes 1968, Chapter 699, Paragraph 1, operative July 1, 1969) the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara has directed the pub- . lishing of the prevailing rate of wages with a copy of the same being on file at the office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. EACH BID SHALL BE MADE OUT ON A FORM TO BE OBTAINED AT THE OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS; shall be accompanied by a certified or cashier's check or bid bond for ten (10) perc~nt of the amount of the bid, made payable to the order of the Treasurer of Santa Barbara County, Santa Barbara, California; shall be sealed and received in the Office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Santa Barbara County, County Administration Building, 105 East Anapamu Street, Santa Barbara, 51 - --- - - -----.~,--.,----------------------__,,.----------.-----=------- 52 Purchasing .~gent auth Dispose of Surolus Pro ( September 21, 1970 California, 93104, on or before 3:00 P.M. on the 15th day of October , 1970 , and will be opened and publicly read aloud at 3:00 P .M. of the day in the Board of Supervisors' Confer ence Room located on the 4th floor of the Santa Barbar a County Administration Building. The above mentioned check or bond shal l be given as a guar antee that the bidder will enter into the contract if awarded to him and will be declared forfeited if the successful bidder refuses to enter into said contract after being requested so to do by the Board of Supervisors of said County. The Board of Supervisors of Santa Barbara County reserves the right to reject any or all bids or waive any informality in a bid. No bidder may withdraw his bid for a period of thirty (30) days after the date set fo r the opening ther eof. Dated: September 21, 1970. s I JI E. LEWIS (SEAT,) County Clerk Santa Barbara, California In the Matter of Request of Purchasing Agent for Authorization to Dispose of Surplus Property. erty Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the request of the Purchasing Agent, dated September 16, 1970, for authorization to donate obsolete surplus Santa Barbara and Santa Maria Hospital equipment no longer suitable for resale, as follows , to the Direct Relief Foundation for distribution to underprivileged hospitals, with con- currence of the County Counsel, be, and the same is hereby, , approved: (see page 53) (for list) Exec 0 ~ con r In the Matter of Execution of Contract between the County and the Los Los Alamos Coordinatin Alamos Coordinating Council for Purpose of Advertising County Resources for Fiscal Co mcil FY 1970- 71 Year 1970-71 for an Amount not to Exceed $250.00. not exceed $250. 00 Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and I carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO. 70-587 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FilE) ' Execution 0 In the Matter of Execution of Contract between the County and the Santa CFaoinrt r FYS M1 9 7 _ Maria Fair for Purpose of Advertising County Resources for Fiscal Year 1970-71 for 71 not exce d $2 , 500 . 00 an Amount not to Exceed $2,500.00. I Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanjmously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUfION NO. 70-588 (ORIGINAL IN.PERMANENT FilE) September 21, 1970 , # Troop #1 , Bov Scou In the Matter of Execution of Permit to Troop #1, Boy Scouts of America, of America Mission Council exec of Mission Council, for Use of County Bowl for Purpose of Selling Christmas Trees permit use Co Bowl . sell Christmas Tre during Period of December 1 through December 25, 1970. I Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell , seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman and Clerk be, and th- ey are hereby, authorized to execute a Permit to Troop #1, Boy Scouts of America, Mission Council, for use of the County Bowl for the purpose of selling Christmas trees during period of December 1 through December 25, 1970; and the Director of Resources and Collections be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to deposit the fee of $25.00 to the General Fund. 53 r . . RECEIVED FROM SANTA BARBARA GEUERAL HOSPITAL ' NO . TAG NO . QUANTITY DESCRIPTION l . 4074 l Bed 2 . 1924 l Hi gh Chair ( ~Jooden) 3. 14814 1 Incubator 4. 1981 1 Incubator 5. 1147 4 l Sterilizer 6 . 20384 1 Bu cke t (ki ck) 7. 7458 1 Ch ai r (dental) 8 . 8587 1 X- Ray Table 9. 8593 l X- Ray Unit l 0. 8461 l Bed (Simmons) 1 l . 8453 ., I Bed (Simmons) l 2 . 8425 1 Bed WITHOUT TAG NOS . 1 3. l Refrige rator (F ri gidai re) l 4. 1 Wa s htub l 5. 1 Rad io (AM) 1 6. 1 Bed l 7 . l Bed 1 8. 1 Bed l 9. l Bed 20 . l Bed 21 . 1 Bathtub \Ii th ro 11 e rs 22. 0- Chair (~Jooden) 23 . l Oven 24 . 1 Radio . . . SANTA BARBARA GENERAL HOSPITAL NO . 2 5. 26 . 27 . 28 . 29 . 30. 31 . 32 . 33. 34. 35. 36 . 37 . 38 . 39 . 40 . 41 . 42 . 43 . 44 . 45 . 46 . 47 . 48 . 16631 QUANTITY 1 2 1 l 1 1 1 1 1 2 I , I 1 1 l 1 2 l l 2 1 l 1 l . . Page 2 DESCRIPTION Bath and Wh irlpool Stool (Metal) Basa l Stand Centri 'i'"uge Sterilizer with Cabinet Te le vision Iron Lung Table (Wooden) Ca binet (Bedside , Wooden) Beds Sink High Chair Potty Chair Walke r Refrigerator (Copeland) Refrige rator (Copeland) Chairs (student - wooden) Dryer Table (wooden, rolling) Vaporizer (Col son) Patient Lifc Tent, Oxygen Vaporizer (Colson) Paraffin Bath 54 Release vv Claims / Release of County Clai I Release of County Cla I Release of County Clai~ I September 21, 1970 ln the Matter of Execution of Release of All County Clai.t:._ !: r D~mages to County Property Resulting from Vehicular Accfdent, in the Amount of $19.00 Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute a Release of all County claims for damages to County property resulting from a vehicular accident, as follows: Beverly Engstrom, Aug. 16, 1970, Redwood Ave. East of Hillview Road. It is further ordered that the Director, Department of Resources * Collections be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to deposit the draft received in full settlement. therefor to the Road Fund In the Matter of Execution of Release of All County Clajms for Dmages to County Property Resulting from Vehicular Accident, in the Amount of $11.46. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute a Release of all County clajms for damages to County property resulting from a vehicular accident, as follows: Sgt. William Allan Graeber, July 5, 1970, Lompoc Casmalia Road. It is further ordered that the Director, Department of Resources * Collections be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to deposit the draft received in full settlement therefor to the Road Fund. In the Matter of Execution of Release of All County Claims for Damages to County Property Resulting from Vehicular Accident, in the Amount of $236.03. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is o.rdered that the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute a Release of all County claims for damages to County property resulting from a vehicular accident, as follows: Helen Emily McKeague, July 9, 1970, Foxen Canyon Road. It is further ordere'd that the Director, Department of Resources * Collections be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to deposit the draft received in full settlement therefor to the Road Fund. In the Matter of Execution of Release of All County Claims for Damages to County Property Resulting from Vehicular Accident, in the Amount of $14.72. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute a Release of all County claims for damages to County property resulting from a vehicular accident, as follows: April Diane Monroe/Robert G. Monroe, Lompoc/Casmalia Road, August 6, 1970 It is further ordered that the Director, Department of Resources ~ Collect- ions be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to deposit the draft received in full settlement therefor to the Road Fund. . I Release of Co Claims I September 21, 1970 In the Matter of Execution of Release of All County Claims for. Damages to County Property Resulting from Vehicular Accident, in the Amount of $24.08. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are Release of Co Claims I hereby, authorized and directed to execute a Release of all County claims for damages to County property resulting from a vehicular accident, as follows: Wendy Koch Wheeler, July 28, 1970, Lompoc-Casmalia Road. It is further ordered that the Director, Department of Resources ~ Collections be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to deposit the draft received in full settlement therefor to the Road Fund. In the Matter of Execution of Release of All County Claims for Damages to County Vehicle Resulting from Vehicular Accident, in the Amount of $68.25. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute a Release of all County claims for damages to County vehicle resulting from a vehicular accident, as follows: Gid Howdeshell, August 4, 1970, 6396 Hollister Ave., Goleta. It is further ordered that the Director, Department of Resources ~ Collect- ions be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to deposit the draft received in full settlement therefor to the Transportation Working Capital Fund. Proclaiming Week o In the Matter of Proclaiming Week of September 21st Constitutional Obser- ~tember 21st Constitutional vance Week. Observance Week I Exec of R/W Contr Ronald L. Acquista pace and Louis ; Brown Rd I Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO. 70-589 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT Fll.E) In the Matter of Execution of Right of Way Contract between the County and Ronald L. Acquistapace and Lois M. Acquistapace in connection with Brown Road Project No. 5016. 2, Parcel No. 5016.2-1. (Cont'd) Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, artd carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized to execute a Right of Way Contract dated September 4, 1970, between the County and Ronald L. Acquistapace and Lois M. Acquistapace in connection with Brown Road Project No. 5016.2, Parcel No. 5016.2-1 Acceptance of R/W In the Matter of Acceptance of Right of Way Grant Conveyed on Donation Basis Grant Ronald L. AcqJistapace & Lou sby Ronald L. Acquistapace and Lois M. Acquistapace to the County for Land Needed for Brown Road I Construction of Brown Road, Job No. 5016.2, Fifth Supervisorial District. 55 ' 56 Exec of R/W Contr Eur.sene -qene LeRoy & And r e Br own Rd I I Acceptance o R/\l Grant Eu~ene Rene LeRov & Ana r~ LeRoy Br own Rd I Exec Jt Use Agr eem't So Calif Edison Co relocatio facilities o San Ysilro f- Exec of Dist Agreem1 t Sta Hwy 135 ~ S Way install Traffic Cont Sj~nal Svste I September 21, 1970 Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that a Right of Way Grant, dated September 4, 1970, conveyed on a donation basis by Ronald L. Acquistapace and Lois M. Acquistapace to the County for land needed for the construction of Brown Road, Job No. 5016.2, Fifth Supervisorial District, be, and the same is hereby, accepted by the County; and the Clerk be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to record said instrument in the office of the Santa Barbara County Recorder. In the Matter of Execution of Right of Way Contract between the County and Eugene Rene LeRoy and Andre LeRoy in connection with Brown Road Project No. 5016.2, Parcel No. 5016.2-2. (Cont'd). Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute a Right of Way Contract, dated September 1, 1970, between the County and Eugene Rene LeRoy and Andre LeRoy in connection with Brown Road Project No. 5016.2, Parcel No. 5016.2-2. In the Matter of Acceptance of Right of Way Grant Conveyed on Donation Basis by Eugene Rene LeRoy and Andrew LeRoy to the County for Land Needed for Construction of Brown Road, Job No. 5016.2, Fifth Supervisorial District. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that a Right of Way Grant, dated August 31, 1970, conveyed on a donation basis by Eugene Rene LeRoy and Andrew LeRoy to the County for land needed for construction of Brown Road, Job No. 5016.2, Fifth Supervisorial District, be, and the same is hereby, accepted by the County; and the Clerk be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to record said instrument in the office of the Santa Barbara County Recorder. ' In the Matter of Execution of Joint Use Agreement between the Southern California Edison Company and the County for Relocation of Certain Facilities on San Ysidro Road, First Supervisorial District, Job No. 1005.1 (for culvert installation vicinity of Bolaro Drive and East Valley Road). Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO. 70-590 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Execution of District Agreement No. 70-23, 05-SB-135-13.0 05103 - 096101, State Highway 135 and Santa Maria Way, between the County and State Division of Highways, whereby County agrees to participate in Cost of Installation of Traffic Control Signal System, Safety Lighting and Channelization at Intersection of Santa Maria Way and State Highway 135 (South Broadway). Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO. 70-591 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) ' 57 Execution of Agree Mark Smith ~ James Dug~e r Tract 10, 376 September 21, 1970 mt In the Matter of Execution of Agreement between the County and Mark J. Smith and James Dugger in connection with Dedication of Access Driveway, Tract #10,376 Unit #1, Fifth Supervisorial Dfstrict. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO. 7-0-592 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FllE) Establishing Stop In the Matter of Establishing Stop Intersections in Isla Vista, Third Intersectio . s in Isla Vis~a / Supervisorial District. Rd Comms appr req of Isla Vis Community Counc close Pirasso R & Pardall qd at E Side of Pesca-iero I Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO. 70-593 (OR[GINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) of Recormnendqtion In the Matter/of Road connn1ss1oner for Approval of Request of Isla Vista a l Coumunity Council to Close Picasso Road and Pardall Road at East Side of Camino Pescadero, Isla Vista. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the recomnendation of the Road Connnissioner for approval of request of Isla Vista Connnunity Council for closure of Picasso Road and Pardall Road at East Side of Camino Pescadero, Isla Vista, to through traffic as permitted in Section 942.S (a) of the California Streets and Highways Code be, and the same is hereby, confirmed. It is further ordered that the above-entitled matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the Road Dept., Sheriff, and California Highway Patrol. Approval or Plans In the Matter of Approval of Plans and Specifications for Construction of Specifications constr Brown Rd Brown Road from 2.36 Miles to 3.36 Miles West of State Highway 1, Log Mile 5.43 to ( Log Mile 6.43, Job No. 5016.2. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the plans and specifications for construction of Brown Road from 2.36 miles to 3.36 miles west of State Highway 1, Log Mile 5.43 to Log Mile 6 . 43, Job No. 5016.2, be, and they are hereby, approved. It is further ordered that bids be received for said project on or before October 15, 1970, at 3 o'clock, p.m., and that the advertisement for bids to be published in the Santa Maria Times, a newspaper of general circulation, as follows to-wit: NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA STATE OF CALIFORNIA ROAD DEPARTMENT Sealed proposals will be received at the Off ice of the County Clerk of Santa Barbara County, Office Building, 312 East Cook Street, Santa Maria, California 93454, on or before 3:00 P.M. on the 15th day of October, 1970, and will be opened and publicly read aloud on said day at said place on or about said time for: 58 September 21, 1970 CONSTRUCTION OF BROWN ROAD From 2.36 Miles to 3.36 Miles West OF STATE HIGHWAY 1 Log Mile 5.43 to Log Mile 6.43 Job No. 5016.2 Bids Open October 15, 1970 ' Bids are required for the entire work described therein. Copies of the Plans, the General and Special Provisions and blank orms suitable for use in bidding on said work may be obtained from the Office of the Road Commissioner, County Court House, and may be purchased therefrom for ELEVEN DOLLARS, said purchase cost not to be refunded. No bid ~ill be considered which is not in accordance with or on the forms herein referred to. Pursuant to the provision.s of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California (Amended by Statutes 1968, Chapter 699, Paragraph 1, operative July 1, 1969) the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara has directed the publishing of the prevailing rate of wages with a copy of the same being on file at the office of the Clerk of Board of Supervisors. Each bid must be accompanied by a certified check, a cashier's check or bid bond in the amount of ten percent (10%) of the total of the bid, made payable to the County of Santa Barbara as a guarantee that the bidder, if awarded the contract, will enter into a contract for the performance thereof satisfactory to said Board of Supervisors. The successful bidder shall be required to guarantee the performance of this contract by a ''Faithful Performance Bond'' in the stnn of one hundred percent (100%) of the contract bid, and a Contractor's Bond'' in the sum of fifty percent (50%) of the contract bid. The Board of Supervisors reserves the right to reject ~ny or all bids, and to waive technical errors and discrepancies, if to do so seems to best serve the public interest. No bid will be accepted from a Contractor who has not been licensed in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 9, Division 111 of the Business and Professions Code. SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS: ''bidders must satisfy themselves by personal examination of the location of the proposed work and by such other means as they prefer as to the actual conditions and requirements of ~he work, and shall not at any time after submission of the bid, dispute, complain, or assert that there was any misunderstanding in regard to the nature or amount of work to be done.''. By order of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, made this 21st day of September 1970. si J. E. LEWIS (SEAT.) J. E. LEWIS, County Clerk Physical Waiver ( September 21, 1970 In the Matter of Approving Request for Waiver of Physical Requirements for Prospective Employee, Solvang Substation, Sheriff's Department. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the request for a waiver of the physical requirements for the following prospective employee be, and the same is hereby approved, as recommended by Dr. David Caldwell: Mrs. Marjorie A. Rock, Typist-Clerk Releasing Tax Bond Tract 10, 7 Unit 1 -In- t-he- M-a-tt-er of Releasing Tax Bond for Tract #10,407, Unit 1. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and I carried unanimously, it is ordered that the tax bond for Tract #10 , 407, Unit 1, in the cash amount of $56.00 be, and the same is hereby, released as to all future acts and conditions, as recommended by the Tax Collector, to Mark J. Smith, 4565 Orcutt I 59 . ' PROPOSAL TO TH.E COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA ROAD DEPARTMENT FO~ CONSTRU CT ION OF BROWN ROAD From 2. 36 Mlles to 3 . 36 Mlles West OF STATE HIGHWAY I Log Mlle 5.43 to Log Mlle 6 .43 Job No . 5016~2 ' TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA: The undersigned, as bidder , declares that t he only person or pa rties interested In this proposal as pr incipals are those named herein; that this proposal is made wi thout col luslon with any other person, firm or corporat ion; that he has carefully examined that location of the proposed work, the annexed proposed form of contract, and he proposes and agrees If t his proposal is accepted, t hat he will cont ract with the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara in the form of the copy of the cont ract annexed hereto, to provi de all necessary machinery, tools, apparatus and other equipment needed, and to do all of the work and furn ish all the materials specified in the contract, in the manner and the time therein prescribed , and according to the requirements of the Road Corrrnissioner a~ t herein set forth , and that he will take In full payment therefor the fol lowing un i t prices, t o wit: . Item Est . Un i t of Unit Price Total No . Quant . Meas ure I tern . ( in figures) (in figures) 1 6 Each Furnish timber barricades, Class I (Santa Ba rbara County Standard) . 2 1250 Sq . Yd . Obl J.terate roadway ~ . . . 3 Lump Lump Clearing and Grubbing Sum Sum 4 2000 M Gal s. Furnishing and applying water - 1 - Brown Road PROPOSAL . I tern Est. Unit of . Un It Pr Ice Tota 1 No. Quant. Measure Item (In figures) (In figures) 5 32,000 Cubic Roadway excavation . Yards 6 16 Cubic Ditch excavat ion Yards 7 . 1 6 Ton Commercial fertilizer 8 22 Ton Straw . 9 785 Pound Seed 10 Lump Lump Fini sh roadway Sum Sum 11 4,700 Cubic Aggregate Subbase, Class 4 Yards 12 7,000 Ton Aggregate base, Cl ass 2 13 4. 2 Ton Asphalt emulsion (fog seal coat) 14 4.2 Ton Asphalt emulsion (paint binder) . . . 15 17.5 Ton . Llqul1 asphalt SC - 70 (Prime coat ' 16 2,550 Ton Asphalt concrete, Type B ~ 17 4,9~0 Linea r Placing asphalt concrete dikes Feet 18 78 Square Placing asphalt concrete Yards (Miscellaneous areas) - 2 - . . Brawn Road . . ""' PROPOSAL . Item Est. Un It of Un It Pr Ice Total No. Quant . Measure Item (In figures) (In f I gt.: res) 19 32 Linear 2211 x 1311 corrugated metal pip Feet arch (16 gage) 20 48 LI near 24 11 Bituminous coated corruga- Feet ted metal pipe (16 gage) 21 156 Linear 2411 Bltuminous coated corruga- Feet ted metal plpe (14 gage) 22 57 2411 Bttumtnous coated paved Jn Lt near vert, corrugated metal plpe Feet ( 14 gage) 23 46 Linea r 4811 Bltumlnous coated paved In vert, corrugated metal plpe Feet (10 aaae) 24 7 Each 2411 Bltumlnous coated metal flared end sectlon 25 2 Each 4811 BI tum I nous coated meta l flared end sect ion 26 74 Linear 1211 Bituminous coated corruga- Feet ted metal plpe down drain 27 2 Each 1211 Bltuml nous coated corrugated metal pipe entrance tapere 28 1 Each 1 211 Anchor assembly . . . 29 3 Each 36 11 Bltumlnous coated OMP Drop . Inlet (14 gage) 30 2 Each 4811 BI tumt nous coated CMP Energy Dissipater (12 gage) ~ . 31 44 ' ' Each Gulde Markers 32 800 Li near Metal beam guard ratl . Feet - 3 - . 1 Srown Road . . "", PROPOSAL Item Est . Un It of Un It Pr Ice Tota 1 No. Quant. Measu re Item (In figures) (in f igures} 33 2 Each Cable end anchor assemblies 34 Lump Lump Cattle Guard Sum Sum ___ , . . . . . -,. . - TOTAL I I - 4 - I 60 Re l e lsing Monu1ent Bon Tr ac; 10, 677 ( Holmlahl fee Stor1 Landscao Lng bond $1, 0 O . Rele \Se of Land 1caping Bond 1 I Cancell .At.io of Taxes 19 Secured Tax Assessment Roll / September 21, 1970 Expressway, Santa Maria, Calif lip the Matter of Releasing Monument Bond for Tract #10,677. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the monument bond for Tract #10,677 in the cash amount of $1,500.00 be, and the same is hereby, released as to all future acts and conditions, as recommended by the Assistant County Surveyor, to Ventura Savings' and Loan Association, 250 S. Mills Road, Ventura, Calif.93003 In the Matter of Recommendation of Planning Department for Placement of Bond for Landscaping for Holmdahl Feed Store, 7U~V-6, Lompoc Valley. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, -it is ordered that the recommendation of the Planning Department ~or :the placement of a bond, in the amount of $1, 000. 00, for landscaping for the Holmdahl Feed Store, 79oV-6, Lompoc Valley be, and the same is hereby, confirmed. The bond should contain wording similar to the following: "In consideration of approval by the County Planning Commission of a Precise Plan of Development (Case No. 70-V-6) for a acility at Lompoc Valley, Parcel No. 83-040-01, Holmdahl Feed Store hereby agrees to install landscaping within one year from the date of issuance of the building permit for this feed store facility, and in accordance witl1 the approved landscaping plan dated 9/14/70, on file with the County Landscape Architect'' In the Matter of Release of Landscaping Bonds. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the following landscaping bonds be, and they are hereby, released as to all future acts and conditions: . . . 0- 71 Roll. / Erlandson Apratments, 60 Eucalyptus Lane, Santa Barbara, Fidelity - Deposit Co. Bond No. 81-18-325, in the amount of $1,500.00 1 Mobil Oil Station, S.E.C. Lakeview Road and Orcutt, Santa Maria, Calif. - Pacific Indenmity Co. Bond No. 265773, in the amount of $5,400.00. In the Mattel'.' of Cancel.J ation of Taxes on J 970-7J ~ecu't'ed Tax Assessment Santa Barbara County Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the following Order was passed and adopted: ORDER WHEREAS, it appears to the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California, that the County of Santa Barbara has acquired title to, and is the owner of certain real property situate in the County of Santa Barbara, State of California; and WHEREAS, it further appears that appl-ication has been made for cancellation of taxes on property described below, as provided by Sections 4986 and 2921.5 of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California; and WHEREAS, it fur~her appears that the written consent of the County Counsel and County Auditor of said County of Santa Barbara to the cancellation of said taxes has been obtained therefor, I September 21, 1970 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Audit or and/or Tax Collector of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California be, and they are hereby authorized and directed to cancel the following taxes on the 1970-71 Secured Roll against the property described below: ' 67-270-23 Code 66-031 assessed to Gary E/Wendy B. Martzolf - recorded 5-28-70 for road purposes - Cancel Land $250, Cash Value $1 ,000 (proportionate share of taxes) as provided by Sections 4986 and 2921.5 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, and transfer balance of taxes due to the Unsecured Roll. 73-230-49 :Code 66-009 assessed to University Exchange Corp - accepted by Tract 10,846 Map for Open Space effective July 1, 1970 - Cancel Land $800 , Cash Value $3,200 as provided by Section 4986 of the Revenue and Taxation Code s/ J. E. LEWIS (SEAL) County Clerk Release Street Tre Planting Bond 11, 0 9 In the Matter of Release of Street Tree Planting Bond for Tract #11,089, Affidavits of Publication I I in the Amount of $232.50. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell , seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously., it is ordered that the street tree planting bond for Tract #11,089, in the cash amount of $232.50 be, and the same is hereby, released to Bur-Van Associates, 4850 E. South Bradley Road, Santa' Maria, California. In the Matter of Publication of Ordinances' Nos. 2110, 2112 , 2114 and 2115. It appearing from the Affidavits of Publication of the Principal Clerks of . the Santa Barpara News-Press and the Santa Maria Times that Ordinances Nos. 2110 , 2112, 2114 and 2115 have been published in the manner and form required by law; Upon motion, duly seconded, and carried unanimously, it is determined that said Ordinances Nos. 2110, 2112, 2114. and 2115 have been published in the . manner and form required by law. In the Matter of Approval of Oil Drilling Bond and Riders. Oil Drillin~ Bo ds Aoproval . Pursuant to the request of the County Petroleum Engineer and in accordance with the provisions cont~ined in Ordinance No. 1927; Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, . it is ordered that the following oil drilling bond and riders be, and the same are hereby)approved: /United States Fire Insurance Company - Frank Goldman, P.O. Box 644, . Bakersfield, Calif., Principal, Blanket Bond No . 724886, covering wells No. 1,3,5,8,12 and 13 known as Los Flores Lease Four Deer Area, and Idle Wells No. 2,6,7,9,10 and 11 / Continental Oil Company - Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Riders to Blanket Bond No. 3507930, covering wells - California 45 and 46, County Permit Nos. 3488 and 3489 Oil Drillin~ Bo ds Releasing In the Matter of Release of Rider to Oil Drilling Bond. Pursuant to the request of the County Petroleum Engineer and in accordance with the provisions contained in Ordinance No. 1927; 61 62 Repor ts &: Communicatio s I September 21, 1970 Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the following ri~er to oil well drilling bond be, and the same is hereby, released as to all future acts and conditions: Texaco Inc. - The Travelers Indemnity Company, Rider to Blanket Bond { T-393, covering well Tognazzini No. 1, County Permit No. 2711 In the Matter of Reports and Communication.s. The following Reports and Communications were received by the Board and ordered placed on file: 11) Administrative Officer - Travel Report Summary, August 1-31, 1970. /2) Park Conmission - Attendance at meetings during July, August, September, 1970. Division of Animal Control - Report of Money collected during August, 1970. Claims A~ain t Co in connec ion In the Matter of Claims Against the County filed by Individuals and/or Isla Vista Attorneys on Behalf of Clients for Alleged Damages . Riots I Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the following claims against the County ~or alleged damages be, and the same are hereby, referred to the County Counsel for rereferral to the County's Insurance Carrier: / Kenneth Miedema, 447 Mills Way, Goleta - $50,000 / Barry Jacobs, 6510 Picasso Road, Apt. 22, Goleta - $50,000 / Jeffrey Spiegleman, 5301 N. Balboa Blvd, Encino, Calif. - $50,000 / Robert Petrasich, 1812 Santa Cruz, San Pedro, Calif. -$50,000. / Fred Takemiya, 1330 N. Meyler St. , San Pedro, Calif. - $50,000 / Joseph D. Lieb, 10 El Verano, Vallejo, Calif. - $10,000. / John K. Stevens, 209 San Marcos, San Francisco, Calif. - $10,000. / Paul Harris, c/o Hatch, Parent Abbott, Attys, P.O. Drawer 720, Santa Barbara - $10,000. . 1Lloyd Sterling Graydon, 12081 Woodbine Drive, Santa Ana, Calif. - $15,000 / Richard Dale Hoffman, 265 Machado, San Luis Obispo, Calif. - $5,501.00 / Alice Amy Mauro, 420 Miramonte Drive, Santa Barbara $100,586.75 / Richard D. Young, Rt. 1, Box 281 , Eureka, Calif. -$50 ,000 / Rolfe G. Buzzell, 811 Camino Pescadero #20, Isla Vista, Calif. - $105,518.15 / Gary Allen Earle, 6551 Segovia Road, Isla Vista, Goleta, Calif - $100,315.00 ; Michael Whitcomb, 6716 Del Playa, #B , Isla Vista - $2,000. / Doneno Fredrick Polizo, 3967 Constellation, Lompoc, Calif. - in excess of $100,000 / Harry Gordon Ainsleigh, Rt. 1, Box 1262, Colfax, Calif. - in excess of $5,000. 1Maxine Greene, 12619 Hortense St., Santa Barbara - in excess of $5,000. 1 Karen Kay Hunt, 2849 Prince, Berkeley, Calif. - $5,000 / Karen Kay Hunt, 2849 Prince, Berkeley, Calif. - $5,200 / Authur Herrera, 1800 Loma St., Santa Barbara - $6,020 / David Duane Wood, 6671 Berkshire Terr. #11, Golet~ - in excess of $5,000 / Karen Kay Hunt, 2849 Prince, Berkeley, Calif. - $5,200 t Claire Pera, 48 B s. Fairview, Goleta - in excess of $5,000. 1Steven L. Cormany, 587 Via Del Cerro, Camarillo, Calif. in excess of / Dr. Walter A. Davis III, 2047 Elise Way, Santa Barbara - $5,000 ' Robert M. Gibson, 6504 Madrid #E, Goleta - $5,000 $5,000. l / Kevin Laurence Block 3211 Bryant, Palo Alto, Calif. -$581.50. , Lowell R. C1-ardy, 107 Glendon Way, Petalima, Calif. - in excess of $5, 000 , Donna Epstein, 796 Embarcadero del Norte #101, Goleta - $5,000. 1Djmitri Koutroufiotis~ 775 Camino,del Sur - E6 , Goleta - in excess of $5,000 / Steven Samuel Miner, 9404 Cervo Vista Dr., Tuj1.unga, Calif. - in excess of $5,000. ;James Edwin Morgan, 4402 Avocado St., Yorba Linda, Calif. - in excess of $5,000. ' Stephen K. Oka, 487 Martin St., Monterey, Calif. - in excess of $5,000 'William R. Norrington, 796 Embarcadero del Norte, Apt. #116, Goleta - in excess of $5,000. , Madeleine Paul, 1115 Corsica Drive, Pacific Palisades - in excess of $5,000 I September 21, 1970 1 James Richard Silva, 5301 Palo Verdi St., Edwards, Calif. - $5,075. / Joseph Ivan Sonier, 4730 Baxter St., Santa Barbara - i n excess of $5,000. r Daniel Thomas, 232 Downing Lane, Santa Maria - in excess of $ 5, 000. 1 Eric Ratner, 5911 Flambeau Rd., Palso Verdes, Calif. - in excess of $5,000. 1 Dean F. Rich, 6590 #4 Cordoba St., Goleta - $5,000. 1 Eric Ratner, 5911 Flambeau Rd., Palos Verdes, Calif. - in excess of $,5, 000 1 Linda Ann Martin, 6788 B Del Playa Drive, Goleta - in excess of $.5 ,000. 1 Frederick H. Hofmann, 17 E. Calle Crespis, Santa Barbara - in excess of $5,000. / Crista Croait (Cris Croak), 6565 Sabado Tarde, #7, Goleta - $119. ; Walter Noel Higa, 474 Scenic Dr. #B, Santa Barbara - $100,000. t Lee B. Leach, 9634 Road 30, Madera, Calif. - in excess of $8,310. 1Geraldine Meeks, 633 Por La Mar Circle, Apt. 114-D, Santa Barbara - in excess of $1,500. ,Ruth Flower, 6690 Abrego Road 4Fl7, Goleta - in excess of $,5,000. 1Kenneth E. Opiat, 1003 Alberta St., Oceanside, Calif. - in excess of $5,000. 1Thomas E. Burke, 230 S. E St., Lompoc, Calif. - in excess of $5,000. 1 Robert Gettlin, 19135 Eccles St., Northridge, Calif - $100,009 , Raymond W. Wolfe, 1392 Camino Rio Verde, Santa Barbara - $500 to $50 ,000. ,Morris F. Friedel!, 6763 Abrego, Apt. 15, Goleta - in excess of $5,000. I Garry Lewis Shaw, 505 N. Lake Shore Dr. , Chicago - in excess of $5,081.50. ,Harry A. Pribble, Jr., 633 Hendrix Ave., Claremont, Calif. - $10,000. 1Donald Glenn Ollis, Jr., 622 Colfax Court, Goleta - $101 ,475 1Stephen Bruce Imhoff, 006 Garden St. , Santa Barbara - $1,000,000. , Geraldine Meeks, 633 Por La Mar Circle Apt. 114-D - in excess of$1,500 1Ghulam Farouq Sharif, Box 14943 UCSB, Santa Barbara - $195.02 , Charles Anthony, 601 Por La Mar Circle, Santa Barbara - $62.00. r Jeffrey A. Barnes, c/o Francis Sarguis, Atty. - $50,000. , Robert A. Martin, 6835 Trigo Rd., Goleta - $250 ,000.00 , Terry F. Reydon, 6691 Abrego #7, Goleta - $102,750.00. ,Greg9ry Thompson Ratliff, 384 Fairchild Drive, Travis Air Force Base, Calif. - $75,050 ,Mary Slaughter, 1007 Chino St., Santa Barbara - $25,331.50. , John David Walla, 504 N. Heathdale , Covina, Calif. - in excess of $5,000. rJohn Michael Christensen, 1214 W. Laurel, Visalia, Calif. - $50,339.10. 1 Palmer William Jenkins, 434 E. Valerio, Santa Barbara - $81.50. / Michael T. Kronman, 101 Ocean Ave., Apt. K-8, Santa Monica - $50,000 /Robert Sweikert, 185 C, Vallejo, Calif. - $50,000 1 Rebe~ca Wilson, 514 Del Norte Rd, Ojai, Calif. - $50,000 1Patrick J. McKinley, 6763 Abrego Rd., Apt. 16, Goleta - $5,000. ,Margaret Mary Burke, 2742 Doverton Square, Mountain View, Calif. - $25,250.00 ,Virginia J. Gregory, 796 Embarcadero del Norte 4F214, Isla Vista - $5 ,-050 ,Katherine O'Neill, 13684 Chalk Hill Rd. , Healdsburg, Calif. - $1,000. 1 Patty Cota, 6F65 Trigo Rd. #A, Goleta - in excess of $5,000. 1Co~ance Leveille, 1262 Sunny Oaks Circle, Altadena, Calif. - $5,277.50. 1 Mary Ann Muir, 1923 De la Vina 4Fl0, Santa Barbara - $5, 300. 1 Ronald C. Swenson, Eunna L. Drake, Ida Pomeroy, Nancy Spickler, 6646 Sabado 63 64 Travel of Assessors Employees (2 Out of State ( D A req Out of State Travel for George Bobol a J Corrections to tax rolls I September 21, 1970 Tarde Apt. B. Goleta - $5,078.50. , ,Barbara Turner, 1115 Corsica Drive, Pacific Palisades, Calif. - in excess of $5,000. /Marvin Monk, Jr., 369 K~vin, Thousand Oaks, Calif. - $181.50. / Mrs. Emma Wilds, 5859 Mandarin, Goleat - $51.30. In the Matter of Approval of Request of County Assessor for Out-of -State Travel for Employees. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that travel from the State of California on County business be, and the same is hereby, authorized for Robert Silva And Kenneth Cady, employees of the County Assessor's office, to audit business accounting records in compliance with State laws at Tulsa, Oklahoma, Dallas * Houston, Texas between the dates of September 27-0ctober 10, 1970, at a total cost of $1,250 with a large portion of the cost to be recovered from other counties under a joint powers agreement. It is ftirther ordered that the amount of $650.00 be, and the same is hereby, withdrawn from the Advance Travel Revolving Fund from the County Auditor to cover necessary expenses. In the Matter of Approval of Request of District Attorney for Out-of-State Travel for Deputy District Attorney George Bobolia. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that travel from the State of California on County business be, and the same is hereby, authorized for Mr. George Bobolia of the District Attorney's office to travel from Chicago while on vacation to Ann Arbor, Michigan between September 28-30, 1970, to contact Washtenaw County prosecuting enforcement officials regarding riot cases. In the Matter of Hearings on Corrections (Additions) to the 1970-71 Secured Assessment Roll. This being the date and time set for hearings on subject proposal; written notification having been given property owners involved; and there being no appearances before the Board of written statements submitted; Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, the following Order was passed and adopted to allow for subject additions: ORDER It satisfactorily appearing to the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California, from a report filed by the County Assessor, that corrections have been made in certain assessments, and application having been made to this Board by said County Assessor for approval of such corrections to the 1970- 71 Secured Assessment Roll, as provided by the Revenue and Taxation Code, Section 4831, 4834, 4836, 255 and. 272; and Salary Resolutions j Ordinance 2118 Salary I September 21, 1970 It further appearing that the sritten consent of the County Counsel and County Auditor of said County of Santa Barbara to the corrections has been obtained therefor; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Auditor and/or Tax Collector of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California be, and they are hereby, authorized to make the necessary corrections in the 1970-71 Secured Assessment Roll, as s~t forth below; Add Homeowner's Exemption to 13-050-05 Code 2001 assessed to Jonathan W/Ruth E. Laxell (Add $750 Exemption) on the 1970- 71 roll because additional information requested was received after timely filing claim. (Section 255) . Add Veteran's Exemption of $1,000 to 123-251-15 Code 3000 assessed to James S/Delia Weare because veteran was in military service outside the United States during the filing period. (Section 272). 81-130-35 Code 94-006 assessed to (John T. fool, Jr.) William C. Sangster, 2101 W. Chapman Avenue, Orange CA 92668, Add Land $6,075, Cash Value $24,300 because of a clerical error in the acreage. Assessor's map indicated 176.83 acres, and map division correction is to 319.75 acres. (Section 4831, etc.). 41-177-06 Code 2001 assessed to James A/Annie Sullivan (912 Calle Cortita, Santa Barbara, 93105) - Add Improvememts $2,250 , Cash Value $9,000 because of a clerical error appraiser had improperly posted information and it was not transmitted to the roll. The foregoing Order entered in the Minutes of the Board of Superv.isors this 21st day of September, 1970. In the Matter of Allowance of Positions, Disallowance of Positions, and Fixing of Compensation for Monthly Salaried Positions. (Fire Department, Effective September 21, 1970). Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOL11rION NO. 70-594 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT Fll.E) In the Matter of Ordinance No. 2118 - An Ordinance of the County of Santa Barbara Amending Section 6 of Ordinance No. 2041, as Amended, being the Salary Ordinance of the County of Santa Barbara. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and 65 carried unanimously, the Board passed and adopted Ordinance No. 2118, establishing classification of Principal Personnel Analyst, Range 75 for the Director of Personnel office, entitled ''An Ordinance of the County of Santa Barbara, Amending Section 6 of Ordinance No. 2041, as Amended, Being the Salary Ordinance of the County of Santa Barbara." Upon the roll being called, the following Supervisors voted Aye, to-wit: Joe J. Callahan, Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell. NOES: None ABSENT: George H. Clyde 66 Bi- 'ieekly Payroll Syst m Overtime Policy ( I September 21, 1970 In the Matter of Report from Administrative Officer on Personnel Manage- ment Information System (Bi-Weekly Payroll System). Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, continued to October 5, 1970 at the request of the Administrative Officer. In the Matter of Proposed Amendment to OvertiDE Policy. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, ' continued to Monday, September 28, 1970, at the request of the Administrative Officer. ~arl Comms In the Matter of recounnendation of Park Counnission to Transfer Agreement Transfer Agr btw Co & S B Riding 0lub S B Co Parks Foundation em't 0 I between the County and Santa Barbara Riding Club to Santa Barbara County Parks Foundation, for Use of County Property (Old County Dump Station). George H. Adams, Director of Parks, elaborated on subject matter, stating there is no charge to the public at this equestrian park but there would be a certain fee for riding groups to have horse shows, etc. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the recommendation of the Park Coumission to transfer the agreement between the County of Santa Barbara and the Santa Barbara Riding Club to the Santa Barbara County Parks Foundation, Inc. be, and the same is hereby, confirmed. It is further ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the County Counsel for preparation of the necessary documents. Execute 1 yr In the Matter of Authorizing Chairman and Clerk to Execute One-Year Renewal Renewal Agre m' t btw Do & Mor isof Lease Agreement between the County of Santa Barbara and Morris Henske, Conservator Henske Hwy Directio - of the Estate of Mary A. Gutierrez, for Placement of Highway Information and Directal Sian City of S M I ional Sign on Property at Northerly End of City of Santa Maria, Fifth District, at Rental Rate of $120 Per Year. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute a one-year renewal of Lease Agreement between the County of Santa Barbara and Morris Henske, Conservator of the Estate of Mary A. Gutierrez for use of property located at the northerly end of the City of Santa Maria, Fifth Supervisorial District for a ' highway information and directional sign, at a rental rate of $120 per year, payable in advance on or before October 9th throughout the life of the lease. It is urther ordered that the County Auditor be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to prepare a warrant, in the amount of $120, payable to Morris Henske, Conservator of the Estate of Mary A. Gutierrez, from Bed Tax Fund Account No. 56-B- 20-A, upon the written request of the Right of Way Agent When the warrant has been prepared by the Auditor, the Right of Way Agent will transmit it to Mr. Henske Exec Substitute Form of R/W Grant to Permit Pacific Gas ~ Electric Co convert Wacilities thru p~rtion Co Pk I/S Hwy 246 & Firs St Solvang ( September 21, 1970 in sufficient time for it to reach him before the rew lease period is effective. In the Matter of Execution of Substitute Form of Right-of-Way Grant to Permit Pacific Gas ~ Electric Company to Convert Facilities through portion of County Park at Intersection of Highway 246 and First Street in Town of Solvang. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute a substitute form of Right of Way from the County of Santa Barbara to Pacific Gas and Electric Company, dated September 21, to provide a 14-foot-wide strip through a portion of the County Park at intersection of Highway 246 and First Street in the Town of Solvang to permit conversion of overhead electrical facilities to an underground system as part of an underground utility district. It is further ordered that the Director of Parks be furnished with a map showing the park area subject to the new right-of-way for underground electrical facilities. A/O Appt Coordinat ng In the Matter of Recommendation of Administrative Officer for Appointment of ~ouncil for S B 0o Air Pollution Coordinating Council for Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District. Control District I A communication was read by the Clerk from Mrs. Josephine Webster with a suggestion that the Community Ecology Center assist in the selection of a person to work on this committee to represent general citizenry and/or the conservation groups Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, continued to Monday, Septemb.er 28, 1970, at the request of the Administrative Officer; and the communication referred to the Administrative Officer Garbage and Ref se In the Matter of Proposed Ordinance Amending Portions of Chapter 17 of Ord amendin~ Portion of Chpt 17 I Plannin~ Dept Purchase 2 Kardex Files / r County Code Pertaining to Garbage and Refuse. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, removed from the agenda upon the request of County Counsel. In the Matter of Recommendation of Planning Director to Approve Requests for Transfer of Funds to Planning Department and Budget Deviation to Purchase 2 Kardex Files to Carry out Public Services Allocation Study. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the request to transfer funds in the amount of $10,900 from LAFCO Account 137-BlS to carry out the Public Services Allocation 67 Study as approved by Resolution No. 70-416 of the Board of Supervisors be, and the same is hereby, approved, as recommended by the Planning Director: To Account 133-A-4 (Extra Help), $9,000. To Account 133-B-15 (Professional Services. Includes $500 for consultant advice, and $1,000 contract service fee, payable to State of California Council on Intergovernmental Relations upon formalization of contract), $1,500. 68 Approval of Final Map 11 , 049 I September 21, 1970 To Account 133-B-22 (Travel), $150. To Account 133-C-l (Capital Equipment}, $250. It is further ordered that the request for a budget deviation be, and the sane is hereby, approved, for the purchase of two Kardex files. In the Matter of Recommendation of Assistant County Surveyor for Approval of Final Map of Tract #11,049 Located West of Orcutt Road, North of Town of Orcutt, Fifth District. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the recommendation of the Assistant County Surveyor to approve the final map of Tract #11,049 located west of Orcutt Road and north of the Town of Orcutt in the Fifth Supervisorial District be, and the same is hereby, confirmed. The map has been found to be technically correct, conforms to the approved tentative map or any approved alterations thereof and complies with all applicable laws and regulations. Also, written notice has been received from the Land Development Coordinator that all affected departments and agencies have certi- fied that their requirements have been satisfied and that all bonds, cash deposits or instruments of credit have been received by the County Clerk; and the County Surveyor's certificate has been executed on the original tracings as provided in Section 11593 of the California Business and Professions Code. Russell Goug rl,: Dr & Mrs. Peter Senn complaints o violation Or 453 on Quiri Property In the Matter of Report from County Counsel on Board Referral of Complaints onfor Violation of Ordinance No. 453, Montecito Area, from Russell A. Gougeon* Dr. * Mrs. Peter Senn, on the Quirin Property, 760 Ashley Road, Montecito. I A/O recom ap r req Sheriff purchase Certain Emergency Equipment I John Mitchell, Deputy County Counsel, reported that there are five people who are classified as tenants on the property and he feels this is in violation of the Ordinance. Mrs. Quirin has been instructed by letter last Friday 1to correct the zoning violation, and if she does not comply, the County may need to take action. I Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, continued to Monday, October 5, 1970 at which time Supervisor Clyde is expected to be present at the Board meeting. In the Matter of Recommendation of Administrative Officer to Approve Request of Sheriff to Purchase Certain Emergency Equipment. I Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the request of the Sheriff to allow the following additions to the Department's Account 90-C-l (Fixed Assets) budget for FY 1970-71 be, and the same is hereby, approved, as recommended by the Administrative Officer; and the Purchasing Agent be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to proceed with the purchase thereof: A} - Equipment: B) - Equipment: Two portable radios, total price plus tax $1,845 One Hi-Lo Monitor Radio scanner, total price plus tax 160 Total $2,005 69 September 21, 1970 Harold Renz ltr eg Veteran ' s Assi could be transferr ed to Santa J\1onica in 1 ieu In the Matte~/~~quest of Harold Renz that Veteran's Assistance be Referred to Veteran's t of local ofrice I Administration in Santa Monica in Lieu of Operation of County Veteran's Service Offices at Education Service Center on Cathedral Oaks Road. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the Administrative Officer. Assembly Gom.~ittee In the Matter of Notice from Assembly Committee on Transportation of Hearnotice on Transoor ation hearing Oct 6, 197 ing October 6, 1970 in Los Angeles for Committee Review of Method of Allocating Review of Method o Allocatin~ Hwy Highway User Taxes. User Taxes Atty Mcl-'1ahon re fee Schedule of Bd for Public Def ender Servic in Juvenile cas be same as Pri'' Attorney.s . ' Bar ister Club & S B Co Bar Assoc report on Admin of Justice duri.n~ Civil Disorders 1970 I Columbus Day Res Commemorating I Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the Administrative Officer. In the Matter of Request from Attorney Patrick L. McMahon that Fee Sched- ule Adopted by the Board for Public Defender Services in Juvenile Cases be as Pres ~ cribed by County Bar Association for Comparable Service by Private Attorneys. te Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the Administrative Officer. In the Matter of Report of Barrister Club of Santa Barbara and Santa Barbara C~unty Bar Association on Administration of Justice during Civil Disorders, Santa Barbara County, 1970. Stanley C. Hatch, Attorney at Law, and President of the Barrister's Club, submitted subject written report to th~ Board and explained its purposes. He read the conclusion of the report which contained 22 recommendations. ,. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject report be, and the same is hereby, filed, and a copy transmitted to the Administrative Officer, County Counsel, and Public Defender for comment. In the Matter of Resolution Commermorating Monday, October 12, 1970, as 11Col11mbus Day11 Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO. 70-595 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT Fll.E) Exec 1 year Contr In the Matter of Execution of One-Year Contract between the County of Santa btw S B Co & Dr. L. David McDermid Barbara and Dr. L. David McDermid, M. D., to Perform Psychiatric Services for Mental Mental H alth Services Health Services at Rate of $20.00 Per Hour. I 70 Uptown Lions Club report from Co on donation of Swimmi ng P oo at Juvenile Hall I Allowance of Claims I September 21, 1970 Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted authorizing the Chairman and Clerk to execute said contract: RESOLUTION NO. 70-596 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT Fll.,E) In the Matter of Report and Recommendation on Proposal of Uptown Lions Club to Construct Swimming Pool at Juvenile Hall. ' Subject report was read by the Clerk with a recommendation from the Chief Probation Officer, Public Works Director, and Juvenile Hall Superintendent that the Board approve subject proposal and for the Club to proceed with the plans and financi ng. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject recommendation be , and the same is hereby, confirmed; and referred t o the Administrative Officer, County Counsel, and Public Works Director for preparation of the proper documents. The Board recessed until 2 o'clock, p.m At 2 o'clock, p.m., the Board reconvened. Present: Supervisors Joe J. Callah-an, Daniel G. Gra-nt, Francis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell; and J. E. Lewis, Clerk. Absent: Supervisor George H. Clyde. I Supervisor Callahan in the Chair as Vice-Chairman In the Matter of Allowance of Claims. Upon motion, duly seconded, and carried unaniinously, it is ordered that the following claims be, and the same are hereby allowed, each claim for the amount and payable out of the fund designated on the face of each claim, respectively, to-wit: Claims List (see page 71) Upon the roll being called, the following Supervisors voted Aye, to-wit: Joe J. Callahan, Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell. NOES: None. ABSENT: George H. Clyde In the Matter of Requests for Approp~iation, Cancellation or Revision of Appropriat io 0ancella ti on or Revision of Funds. Funds I Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the following requests for appropriation, cancellation or 71 September 21, 1970 , Claims List I ,. i I N UMBER . , 7111 7111 '"' 7111 7111 ,., 7111 710 , 7111 , 7111 ,'' " 731 YM7 , , ,.,. '"' 7171 7171 7Jf 4 ,',",.' ,.,. 7171 , 7111 ', * 11M '*'' A C -1 !57 . AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER ' FUND _ SAN'I:A BARBARA COUNTY DATE \ PAYEE -.u , NJ.ill' lilli Uta 11ar _ . ,. . . a.a. l ftt.1 . . .- 1 .,. . - . ~. lllddl ---- . , . . .- -.wa.~- ~ ~ 1tl.e1llMI ---lilt u . u . ~ . . lliirfta . Uetell'9 PURPOSE . __ . .aY . .,_ . . . SYMBOL l. JA 1 n ' 1 a JA 11 an 11 l llU uan 16811 , n 10 10 11, 1110 WARRANT ALLOWED FOR , . M.41 11.n 11.u . 11.11 "' eo.oo u . . . 111.u "" M.ot ''' 11.oe 11.00 11.IO . 40.11 J,101.00 481.00 70.00 1.10 41.00 JI.to 70.00 n.oo 11.60 JI.II 1.11 111.0I 1.71 100.0I 11.41 REMARKS ' . ' AUDITOR'S-WARRANT REGISTER ' FUND._ SANT A BARBARA COUNTY '--- ----.iDJATE- ===="-="=--l'-l.:.:'---U70 N UMBER I PA YEE ,., ~ 11 ., , . 7110 1, ,., , ., -ll ~ 8'ft YIM , 7Jtl , 7Jn 101 7401 f 40I , titr . Ilaria eal&fe1ee f91&t DWJ.l._ lliMH . . a lI PURPOSE SYMBOL ,,., aoaao . t II It . .,,_~ 17.alo c I. -~ . (0-71-S) tM~ ,.,. . II 8 It IJ 40 13 a a 11 IO e I a aa a IO , , , u. HaUe , , , 7407 , nau ?410 7411 Y4U 7411 ''" . f411 7'11 t4l7 711 7411 7410 . ,411 . 7411 AC-I !57 e.n. . .-, ,i, . ~ of e.111 OD II 8 J 111 i; eiilil . .-.i Iii . -i Galli ""'. - '. .i . lllllilln ' bi.a -~-- I ctlQ. aa11 to a 11 u ~ . ltl uo .' , ., . 111 a II lot 1Ua U lOt a I lM a II WARRANT ALLOWED FOR 10.00 ao.n 17.U . , . t1.a1 * e.u oo 171.41 1.u,.00 100.00 ll0.00 w.oo 10.00 100.00 ao.oo JA.11 111.20 4.00 . 11.00 1.00 I00.00 u.Ht.oo . U.JI . . at.10 It.to 11.11 11.00 ' REMA RKS . I NUMBER t411 f 11 , , . ,. , ~- Y411 . , . ''" ''" . . , ,.,. , . 74tJ; . , . , . , . , . , , 74 , . 1411 , . , . Y414 Y411 ,., , , AC I !57 I - -T" -"'7"" r- :So ~rrv. -~ t- -T' ---- -. -r----; 1 -- - \ "' t '-, ,/ - -- ------;---~,-------------------. 1 !. .1 AUDITOR'S W~RRANT REGISTER ' SANT A BAR.BARA colf NT'l' . , ' ' t I t . ~ l FUND _, ' PAYEE ' . . *1 ., ,. . . , ,. . . 11' lift .C l&f .l Wft-- -~ . , . _ . PURPOSE . . . lll illj . a*- i.a . . . . ., . . . . w . . _ . . . trU&lllaa ., . . -Mia. ~ l ' ' .,SYMBOL ' \ lot., J.GI , , \ 109 l 107 " 11 ll lOY tl .- 19' , . Uoa' uo 110 * lll ** U4 all UI o lM a II 1t7. & . , uo at UOU fj 0 \ WARRA.NT ALLOWED FOR ,0 ' tt.oo ~ . ,. I ,. iM.00 100.00 HI.to 141.d oo.oo , . . ~f . 11.11 111,40 1.11 lt.11 14.00 M.01 JLOO oo u.oo . u.oo . .,. lJ0 00 u.oo . s.01.11 11.00 100.00 u.oo o J REMARK.S " ' I ' I . NUMBER f 461 7411 , . , , . 7419 ,. . , . , , , ,. '''l , ,. .,. ''" ., ,. ,. , , 1 , 7411 741 ., , ,., , 7410 , , , 7411 ''" ,'. ".' A C-1!57 . AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANT A BARBARA COUNTY ' \ FUND~V1a-----'-----LDATE llllW! 11 .1970 PAYEE ,. . . G . JA 1~ u. '1.llMU . . . . *1 1aan1 . ftllMd.e . ,., . . ~--- PURPOSE I ~ It _ l - . . SYMBOL 110 11 llO 119 a 21 111 a I 111 11 111 WARRANT ALLOWED FOR 11.00 ltl.71 11.00 111.10 IJ.IO 110.00 111.00 1,107.,1 111.00 Jl.00 1.00 10.00 ' 11.00 aee.oo 110.00 11.IO 111.4* .,. . 101.11 i,ou.so 11.00 11.IO 11.10 IO.to 11.10 MO.II .10 l,&crt.Ot 11.IO uo.oo 411.00 lJ0.00 ' REMARKS a1.x . an JllD JO.GO cg 9 JIJ.00 a D x '~'! . , . --'-ll 10 IO. .C.U.D. tl.10 " a . N UMBER I , '"' 7100 7101 , 7IOI 71M , . , 7I01 ''' 710t 1110 71U 7111 ''" '7114 7111 ;7111 .,.1, YIU 7111 YUO '21 'UI 'dJ HM HU ,.a. ?127 7U8 , 71IO 710. ,. , . 7114 7111 , AC- I !57 AUDITOR'S~ WARRANT REGISTER ~ ' FUND .,.~\,.____~~~~---'-' PAYEE PURPOSE aa1lli .-11 , ln ,.,. . MIWlll Ha1Maift . . .___ . lldillla . lt, . -. .u 1111 - u ~. .a.a lllili.ia u . . . llilillal Ana t ~ ~ . _.a . ._. , WUU eJtws . . . . . iU1 MlN . , . . . , - SYMBOL u1an 111 a It t1o 111 10 111 a II Ula UI ll t1o - . W ARRA NT ALLOWED FOR 47.10 n.oo ' " 11.00 IJ.o.--. o TJ.10 u . 11.10 1.10 '' 10.IO 11.00 lt ta.14 lM.tl 11.ao lta . 1.1 1, u.11 .oo ,. n.oo oo o J.l.IO . n.to J0.00 IO u.oo 10.00 10.00 1.00 II.to IO HI.JO I REMA RKS , . . J 111 1' as.oo 117 11 11.11 NUMBER , 1119 7140 , , ~Ml YNi f144 7141 ., 7Nt , . t tllO ,, , , . 71M 7111 , . ., ,. ' . ., , . 'Ml , , , , , . ,, , . , , , ' ,., ,.,. tnl AC-157 . . AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER \ PAYEE . ~. u . . . ltll - . . ' . .,.~ flUl~. r.a. ., . . . .y_, L ffllAIN Is IJ.'n ti Jell_. . , ,. ,.,. , , ., . Mi . . ll'lo4 1 1-1 . iu -. . -In ~ , . . . _. . . tlMUal tin . l , . , . SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PURPOSE SYMBOL U . 11 . . ._"1 UI ll ---- ., . . . , . _ . 111. *' 111 . ' lMaW Ut , 11 ft'. u UY a 11 lit ' 119 a I 111 u. UJa 11 u. o Uta 11 . . -. WARRANT ALLOWED FOR . ,. oo 11.IO 11.so u . UY.00 - ' 410.00 110.00 60.00 l.IO ~10 . ,. l.J 1.10 3i a.n.oo . n.11 1'1.M 10.10 ".'oo' l.OI a.oo .,.oo lt.11 ,._ . oo .u.u. . 11.u , . REMARKS ' 11. AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANTA BARBARA COUNTY . ' FUND ae-' . . _____ .DATE --11. 1170 NUMBER l 7174 7171 ,. 7177 7178 7111 7180 PAYEE ., e.111 MliOn eo ti.tau PU RPOSE 7181 Jl4 - 718J 758t, 7181 7586 7187 7181 7189 7110 ,. .,th fl.lpilOla 001U Wtar Din IO Galli G CO ~ftlllpboneOO 001-.ooww-. IO llf Mil 00 ' e.111 lllU.9ilia 7192 Calif OU 71tl ti- d hldf i U9ft ., . u.-eo lol'ftllll911md; . . IO Jif GM SYMBOL 111 B II , 111 10 J.6'. 11 171 lJ 110 a I 180 a II UI a II . WARRANT ALLOWED FOR 2.40 l,447.61 711.40 w.oo 11.00 11.00 11.00 74.10 70.8' il. 106.18 11.71 1.11 uo.as 207.18 116.74 11.n . 17.61 22J.IO ui. 21.37 H.40 12.10 71M , , 7117 .Mil.l.b. . (l.4lll.llt A Cl-!57 I B 14 1' 10." UaM u l 17. 14 . u 71 14 MaU nau ,. '' 11914 81 1 90aU 101111 - 181.62 s "" 113.11 .,. aa.ao 47.11 1.18 ,7.11 17.ll u~ u.21 M.51 ''' R EMARKS n ;\ ' ) I ~ \ l NUMBER PAYEE ACIS7 AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANT A BARBARA COUNTY PURPOSE SYMBOL WARRANT ALLOWED FOR n.sao.11 - 11.71 c "'l.16 REMARKS N UMBER I ''" 7600 7601 7t02 101 7604 7601 7606 7607 710I AC I !57 AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER PAYEE cal'f ._ - DCIO ,_.~ e.t.ty of J'AllllPOG '"' ol Cu Uni 011 00 of oass f 1.e\mtit ~ Golda 00 ft.It Dift to eo au eo IO Calif ll 90 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PURPOSE SYMBOL 140 a I ftt MO a lea l . , llmd.lfl - haw np 140 a II 140 a IS c1o c1o WARRANT ALLOWED FOR Ul.41 9.JJ 182.79 .10 109 08 M0.41 U7.41 18.11 9.S'7 as.11 1,2188 REMARKS Vil laft NUMBER 76ot 7610 7111 7111 71U 761' 7111 7116 7117 7618 lt 9120 I 7111 7111 711J 7614 7625 AC-1 !57 ~ AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER PAYEE ~ ,IOJ.et ,.1 . i.-t11a M1--lO at tt.el4 CO etyet' 9"ln1a WU Oo . ki _ . JI'. .e.ta tif ._.l&tat1i WV &ct , 1' 00 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PURPOSE SYMBOL c 2 - I Oto -., 124 14 ' IJO at Ola 6 OU 120 llW 100 ,., Jlt . -. Jlt. u lltlinta1 Jlt 17 llt 10 31 111 JJ do WARRANT ALLOWED FOR 77.11 26.40 lOJ.tJ 59.50 4.58 4,4J7.28 18.Jl ,sn.11 . soo.oo 100.00 10.IO J.00 70.11 110.ao 11.14 H.10 1.00 741.14 REMARKS AU1n D OUll. U ' 114 a JA 11.as 114. 22 41.70 . 19XGA -- Uo lA J,2M.OI a D l.M CIU D 110 ~ .~ 1,JOl.11 - !t;~-- . M f ' . NUMBER PAYEE AC-1 !S7 AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANTA BARBARA COUNTY _____ DATE Pl111.ill 21, 1Jl70 PUR. POSE SYMBOL WARRANT ALLOWED FOR REMARKS NUMBER l"-t2J ., . _, II . , 27 .J-618 ' . llilll29 .Jti410 .i-ea1 .J'4SI ,, .-.u . AC-1 !57 . ; .- AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER PAYEE Wa'l.th Daft.4 ' . ~ 1.- . a.11 N GDl'I- 11 . llya ., , , .u. 1111n , I SANT A BARBARA COUNTY '------_.DATE UM"19 11, 1970 PURPOSE SYMBOL to A 10 a. 102 10 40 ,., 103 A 1 .,._ lCM A lO IO lrr , l \ \ WARRANT ALLOWED FOR 11.17 . 16.07 111.u 14.11 1.00 . ,. . Ma.DI as.ao 14.00 ' :U.67 41.0i 119.H a.2.so REMARKS ' ' 'I \ I NUMBER ' ' . AC-157 . - AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER . . . PAYEE t of ' . . SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PURPOSE OdllUe DSlllJOI' GlllllAL SYMBOL ' , WARRANT ALLOWED FOR 11,110 aa 1.211.aa 1t.01 lOJ.t) ~21.e1 100.00 l,148.71 3,42.IO . . . ., REMARKS . I I 1 72 ' I:Jla Vista g3rvice Gent r a;peal of G l.IllITla XI Bld A3soc of Alp a 031 ta Pi $)rority I Janes H . For ap?eal allow ce r-tain parce of 17, 000 sq t in3tead of re qu Lred 5 acre D-Jesign l\.P ?LIED in rsla Vista Goleta Valley (71-RZ-36) Or l inance 2119 I September 21, 1970 Transfer from 90-C-l the sum of $2,005, Sheriff's Department, General Fund . Transfer from 152 B 9 to 152 C 1, the sum of $7,012, Public Works Disposal Division, General Fund. In the Matter of Hearing on Appeal of Gamma Xi Building Association of Alpha Delta Pi Sorority from Planning Commission Decision to Approve Request of Isla Vista Community Service Center (70-CP-49) for Issuance of Conditional Use Permit to Establish and Operate Community Service Center under Ordinance No. 661 at 6510 Pardall Road, Isla Vista, Goleta Valley. ' This being the date and time set for hearing; the Affidavit of Publication being on file with the Clerk; A communication was received and read by the Clerk from Glen and Bernice Wood in opposition to the center. Communications were received and read by the Clerk from Ray Varley, Vice Chancellor, Business and Finance at the University of California at Santa Barbara and also Kati Perry, member of Board of Directors of the Isla Vista Community Council, with the request to formally withdraw the application for a conditional land use - permit for a proposed trailer site at 6511 Pardall, and also the request to remove subject matter from the agenda inasmuch as the Isla Vista Community Center, Inc. has obtained a lease on the former ''Professional Building'' at 966 Embarcadero Del Mar at a cost of $1,000 per month for the entire building, with an option to buy at the end of one year, and all lease monies to be applied to the price of _the building. There being no further appearances or written statements submitted for or against subject proposal; Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject hearing be, and the same is hereby, removed from the agenda. In the Matter of Continued Hearing on Appeal of James H. Forman from Planning Commission Denial of Request (79eV-43) for Conditional Exception to Allow Creation of Parcel Approximately 17,000 Sq. Ft. in Size instead of Required 5 Acres at 690 North Fairview Avenue, Goleta. This being the date and time set for the continued hearing on subject appeal; Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject hearing be, and the same is hereby, duly and regularly continued to Monday, September 28, 1970, at 2 o'clock, p.m., at the request of the appellant. In the Matter of Hearing on Planning Commission Recommendation to adopt Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 661 Applying D-Design Supervision Combining Regulations to Portion of County Known as Isla Vista, Goleta Valley (70-RZ-36). September 21, 1970 This being the date and time set for hearing on subject proposal; The Clerk read the report of the Planning Commission who recommended adoption of said amendment to the area in question on the basis of the Summary, Report of Findings and Recommendation as set forth in Planning CoUlllission Resolution No. 70-79 as these regulations can guide development of vacant lands remaining in the Isla Vista area and thereby improve the appearance of the community. Mrs. George (Lois) Sidenberg, Chairman of the Santa Barbara County 1970 Grand Jury Committee on Building, Planning, Public Works, Roads, Parking and Zoning, appeared before the Board to express conc~rn about the Isla Vista area, and strongly recommends adoption of subject amendment and have the Architectural Board of Review use the combined regulations. Mr. Robert Haller of 6 ~6 7 Sabado Tarde Road, Isla Vista, representing the Isla Vista Association, appeared to endorse the proposed ordinance. The Isla Vista Community Council also unanimously endorsed the proposal last Spring. Mrs. Cecily Buckley of 6875 Sabado Tarde Road, Isla Vista, appeared regarding the progressive degradation of the physical aspects of Isla Vista. She said there are two principles that should be considered in planning the future of Isla Vista; there should be no higher density including the area east of the school should be rezoned for open space. There is the need for more open space and park space. Also, the Architectural Board of Review is very much needed as the very minimum consideration for the future of Isla Vista. The area should be like Monterey, an academic community where faculty and students can feel proud of their surroundings. Dan Kennedy, Pastor of the United Methodist Church at the campus appeared in favor of the proposed amendment. There being no further appearances or written statements submitted for or against subject proposal; Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and 73 carried unanimously, it is ordered that the recommendation of the Planning Commission to adopt an ordinance amending Article IV of Ordinance No. 661 of the County of Santa Barbara, as amended, applying the D-Design Supervising Combining Regulations as set forth in Section 3 of Article VI of Ordinance to that portion of the County of Santa Barbara commonly known as Isla Vista be, and the same is hereby, confirmed, on the basis of the Summary, Report of Findings and Recommendation as set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. 70-79, the area being presently zoned 6-R-1-0, C-2, SR-2, and SR-4. Under these regulations, there will be the requirement for architectural review of all structur es to be erected, altered, moved, enlarged or rebuilt. The area is bounded on the north by El Colegio Road; on the east by the main campus of the University of California, on the south by the Pacific Ocean; and on the west by a line coinciding with the southerly extension of Storke Road to its intersection with the Pacific Ocean. It is further ordered that the Board passed and adopted the following ordinance: 74 Or d . 2119 D - Desi~n and " oi( Oil Drilling Regulations September 21, 1970 In the Matter of Ordinance Nol 2119 - An Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 661 of the Coiinty of Santa Barbara, as Amended, by Adding Section 650 to Article r.v of Said Ordinance. Upon the roll being called, the following Supervisors voted Aye, to-wit: Joe J. Callahan, Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell. NOES: None. ABSENT: George H. Clyde. "O" Oil In the Matter of Hearing on Planning Connnission Reconnnendation to Adopt Drilling Combining Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 661 Deleting ''O'' - Oil Drilling Combining Regulations Re~ulations Isla Vista from Portion of County Known as Isla Vista, Goleta Valley (70-RZ-55). I Goleta. Vall y I This being the date and time set for hearing on subject proposal; the Affidavit of Publication being on file with the Clerk; The same persons appeared in favor of subject proposal as the Planning Connnission recouunendation to adopt an ordinance applying D-Design Supervision Combining Regulations for the same area (Ordinance No. 2119); Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the Board passed and adopted Ordinance No. 2119 on subject proposal jointly with applying the D-Design Supervision Combining Regulations this date. Said ordinance deletes the ''O'' - Oil Drilling Combining Regulations as set forth in Section 1 of Article VI of Ordinance No. 661 , on the basis of the S11mmary, Report of Findings and Recommendations as set forth in Planning Couunission Resolution No. 70-80. The area is presently zoned 6-R-1-0, and the adoption of subject ordinance will not permit the production of oil, gas or other hydrocarbon substances. Midtown Deve op- In the Matter of Hearing on Planning Connnission Recouunendation to Adopt ment rezone Ordinance 2120 ( Ordinance Amending Article r.v of Ordinance No. 661 from Request of Midtown Development Company (70-RZ-56) (Tract #11,174) to Rezone Property on South Side of Patterson Avenue near its Southwest Turn Approximately 1,000 Feet Easterly from Camino Meleno, Goleta, from the A-1-X to 12-R-l Distri' ct Classification. This being the date and time set for hearing on subject proposal; the Affidavit of Publication being on file with the Clerk; and there being no appearances or written statements submitted for or against subject proposal; Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the recoDlllendation of the Planning Conmission from request ofMidtown Development Company (70-RZ-56) (Tract #11,174) to initiate an ordinance amending Article IV of Ordinance No. 661, as amended, of the County of Santa Barbara, to rezone property described as major portion of Assessor's Parcel No. 69-060-30, generally located on the south side of Patterson Avenue near its southwest turn and approximately 1,000 feet easterly from Camino Meleno, Goleta Valley, from the A-1-X, Exclusive Agricultural District (permits certain agricultural uses on 5-acre building sites) to the 12-R-l, Single Family Residential District (permits single family dwellings on 12,000 sq.ft. building sites) of said ordinance be, and the same is hereby, confirmed, and the Board passed and adopted the following ?1idtown Development rezone Ord 2120 / Appeal of A Pedott on Macco Corporat' permit I September 21,1970 ordinance on the basis of the Summary, Report of Findings and Recommendations as set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. 70-88: In the Matter of Ordinance No. 2120 - An Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 661 of the County of Santa Barbara, as Amended, by Adding Section 651 to Article IV of Said Ordinance. Upon the roll being called, the following Supervisors voted Aye, to-wit: Joe J. Callahan, Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell NOES: None ABSENT: George H. Clyde. -In the Matter of Hearings on a) Appeal of Mrs. Adolf C. Pedotti from n Planning Commission Decision to Grant Request of Macco Corporation (Rancho Santa Barbara) (70-CP-33) for Issuance of Conditional Use Permit on Portions of Hollister Ranch Located Westerly of Gaviota; b) Appeal of Macco Corporation (Rancho Santa Barbara) of Condition No. 45 of Said Conditional Use Permit; and c) Planning Commission Recommendation from Request of Macco Corporation (Rancho Santa Barbara) {70-RZ-34) to Adopt Ordinance Amending Article IV of Ordinance No. 661 to Rezone Certain Portions from 100-AL-0 to 100-AL-0-PC Planned Commercial and BO-Beach Development Districts. This being the date and time set for hear ings on subject proposals; the Affidavit of Publication being on file with the Clerk; Communications were received by the Board and read by the Clerk: Mrs. Helen L. Pedotti - she felt that setting a definite time limit in days, weeks, or months would strengthen the hands of the County and of the Permittee in enforcing the conditions set, and would lessen the chance of misunderstandings and disappointment among the users of the sites and cottages. Such specific time limits are commonly and successfully used in State and Federal public parks. - ' Mrs. Charles Tutenberg - the requests for rezoning are absolutely against the interests of the public and the County General Plan and should be denied . League of Women Voters of Santa Barbara - in support of the County General Plan which permits agricultural and recreational uses of the Hollister Ranch land. She urged the Board to see that the spirit and intent of the County General Plan is upheld, that this land be used in no respect for permanent residences, and that public beach access be maintained in perpetuity as a condition of granting the conditional use permit requested by Macco Corporation. Mrs. James Higman for the Sierra Club, Los Padres Chapter - in opposition t;o the inclusion of the 11Cabina11 concept in the proposal, and recommends that a time ljmjtation of travel trailer and camper vehicle occupancy be adopted comparable to that of California State Park and Recreation areas, specifically a maximum of 10 days in the summer season, and 30 days during winter and other months, per family. The Clerk read the Zoning Report of the Planning Commission, dated September 16, 1970, referring to the filing of a general appeal by an interested property owner and an organization. Based on testimony by one of the appellants at a public 75 76 I September 21, 1970 hearing on July 1, 1970, it is assumed that the objection is to the possible long term occupancy of the recreational vehicle sites. The Planning Commission was also vitally concerned and, in its considered judgment, has reduced this possibility to a minimum by imposition of certain considerations such as: Recreation Vehicle is defined as a camp car, motor home, travel trailer or tent trailer, with or without motive power, designed for hilman habitation for recreational or emergency occupancy, with a living area less than 220 sq. ft. excluding built-in equipment such as wardrobes, closets, - cabinets, kitchen units or fixtures, bath and toilet rooms, and is identified as a recreational vehicle by the manufacturer. Not more than one recreational vehicle and its attached accessory facilities shall occupy any given campsite. On Occupancy Limitations, this Conditional Use Permit is for a ''recreational camp''. Therefore, the 1,415 sites for recreational vehicles are to be used for recreational stays which are stays of limited duration rather than permanent or long term residency. While County and permittee agree this recreational rather than residential occupancy of the recreational vehicle sites, they are unable, because of the newness of such a development, to develop an occupancy limitation condition for this permit which will effectuate this recreational purpose and also be a practical condition for permittee to operate under and for County to review for compliance. Therefore, the practices of permittee in effectuating the recreational rather than residential use of the recreational vehicle sites shall be reviewed annually by the Planning Commission on the basis of a report submitted by the permittee. Such a review may be held at a regular meeting rather than a noticed public hearing of said Commission. If the annual review of such occupancy shows that additional conditions on occupancy may need to be imposed to effectuate the recreational rather than residential use of the recreational vehicle sites, the Planning Commission may consider the addition of new occupancy conditions at a noticed public hearing. Enrollment in any public elementary or secondary school of any child, other than a child of a full-time employee of the permittee living in a permanent dwelling, living in the area of the recreat- I ional camp sites and using such a camp site as the child's residence shall constitute a violation of this permit as evidencing a residential rather than a recreational use of the recreational vehicle site. The applicant has appealed Condition No. 45 which requires, prior to occupancy, annexation of the 2,400 acres to the Goleta Flood Zone. This was thoroughly considered by the Planning Commission who accepted the recoamendat ion of the Flood Control Engineer and felt the final decision should be by the Board of Supervisors. The possibility of a separate District vs. annexation to an existing District was discussed and annexation was recommended. The Planning Commission carefully considered the criteria for the granting of a Conditional Use Permit as set out in paragraph b) of Section 3 of Article XI of Ordinance No. 661, and determined that the recreational camp and allied uses will be consistent with the General Plan designation of Agriculture and Recreation for the area in question. H. H. Divelbiss, Planning Director, in orienting the Board referred to a ''Plot Plan of the Goleta Coast''. The area shown is not the enti re coverage of the September 21, 1970 Hollister Ranch as there are 11,000 additional acres of ranch land. The camp sites were depicted in yellow shading which is the area involved in the conditional use permit. The area bordered in orange is for rezoning for which separate conditions are to be imposed. Supervisor Beattie asked if the commercial area shown is strictly for the service of the people in the area, and Mr. Divelbiss explained that the conditions placed on it and the type of commercial is accessory and incidental to the recreational use. The applicant has developed rather elaborate plans for gift shops, etc. that have no other function except to service the recreational use. Attorney George H. Allen appeared before the Board on behalf of Macco Corporation(Rancho Santa Barbara), indicating the unanimous approval by the Planning Commission of the proposed development after five hearings covering a period of three months, with the most complicated set of conditions ever imposed. There are over 63 conditions, he said. He commented briefly on the County General Plan. Even though the Planning Commission and staff unanimously felt this development is consistent with the County General Plan, some of the comments in the letters read indicate a misunderstanding of the character and contents of the Plan. The General Plan, as such, is not a plan in which no substantial growth of this County is envisioned. It envisions a great growth. One of the cornerstones of the General Plan as written is an insistence that recreational developments should not only be permitted but actively encouraged. Apart from the very specific plan and map on this property, the narrative text of the County General Plan shows that private development of future recreational area is anticipated. He quoted a portion of the narrative of the County General Plan on what is envisioned in it . In relation to its comments of the development of recreational resources by the private sector, he read from page 55 of the General Plan. The proposal was conceived, planned and designed to meet the requirements and guidelines of the General Plan. It conforms to the intent and specific content of the Plan. He briefly reviewed the general layout as shown on the development plan or map, mentioning a major access road and a gatehouse. There will be clusters of camp sites which in general follow the existing terrain and will not be flattened out. It generally f ollows the top of the ridge in each of the areas pointed out. There I will be a minimum of grading for the roads and individual camp sites as laid out on the map. In addition to the overnight uses, he designated the two major day use areas for picnicking, athletic fields, equestrian center for horseback riding and stables. Trails are shown throughout the development as well as the cul-de-sac roads serving the camp sites. The standards for recreational vehicle camps are set by State law. In addition to these, tent camps are permitted. Each site will be serviced by ' underground utilities, sewer, electrical and water connections the same as for state and national parks. Serving this complex will be a water treatment plant as indicated on t he plans. The storage yard was also pointed out on the map. The provision for camp sites of this character by the private sector is not. as unusual as it seems. Of the 675,000 camp sites in the United States, the Federal government supplies 29,000 . . and the various states provide approximately 200,000. Over 60% of all developed camp sites in the State are provided by the private sector. He referred to a report from the Director of the National Park Service relating to the private sector in which it 78 ' , September 21, 1970 was indicated that the National Park system is not expanding their campground services. Colored renderings were displayed before the Board of ''The Gaviota Coast Bulito Village'' (secondphase); ''The Gaviota Coast Drake Village'' (first phase); and ''The Gaviota Coast Drake Pt. Park'' . There will be 200 units of a mobile home park. During the Planning Connnission hearing, it became apparent that the structures could be used as modular or factory housing. Supervisor Tunnell absent at this time. The plans for these particular units are now part of the reconnnendation in this case showing the exterior and interior of each of the units. No grading for pads will be necessary in the area pointed out as pilings will be used instead, conforming to the topography. The only grading will be for roadways to serve these units. These wooden structures are smaller than mobile homes for . permanent living. There is no large st,orage space or laundry facilities and are conveived as a cottage type for vacation purposes . They should be treated as part of the commercial development, as part of a planned commercial cottage-type hotel. These may be sold to individual purchasers. All the maintenance will be performed by the developer including landscaping and there will be no subdivision of the land or ownership interest of the land qf the owners. He pointed out that it is in all respects comparable to the 109 units at Cachuma Park . With regard to the occupancy aspects, it is to the developer's financial and economic interest that there be the type of turnover that is indicated. Over 51% of the anticipated revenue from this project will come from per capita spending and admissions. It is important to the developer that the commercial facilities and admissions be such and utilized by as large a number of people as possible. Regarding the length of stay he pointed out the social philosophy. Is the County ready for social planning? Is the County ready to determine that a specific resort hotel or a guest ranch or a private club is undesirable? Is the County concerned with the duration of the stay of people at Alisa! Ranch or the Biltmore Hotel? If the County is concerned, it could consider the regulation of rates and fees to maximize the people's use of these private facilities. In the context of land use planning, it makes no difference whether a guest at the Alisal Ranch stays one night, one week, or even a month or year. Every facility and every service is precisely the same regardless of the turnover rate. Except for school. He touched upon the annexation to the Goleta Flood Zone and the tax element. The Board should defer action with regard to this until such time as the need is shown, and requested that the condition requiring such annexation be deleted from the conditional use permit and the zone change. Supervisor Callahan asked if there is any part of the development where the public will be able to enjoy any part of the beach, and Attorney Allen said the public will be able as a day user at a fee consistent with fees charged for parks to use all facilities except camp sites which require an additional fee. There will be an entrance fee at the gate and the area opened to such use. Mrs . Pedotti appeared briefly and referred to the contents of her letter. as Robert Hazard appeared before the Board/an individual, objecting to this development for many reasons. He said the Hollister Ranch is about the most beautiful September 21, 1970 piece of land of its size in the county, with beautiful landscaping. It is the beaches that make the ranch unique. Is this development in the best interests of the citizens of this County? This would be of no great value for the people in our community but it would for people in the Los Angeles area. Any development here will be detrimental to the true value of the land and for the citizens of this area. The first choice use of the land would be to make it available to the general public now - create a national park with a wilderness project. 79 Supervisor Beattie remarked that all the national parks have commercial areas which is very similar. Mr. Hazard said this area is the last coastline left in its I natural true state. This is notan economically feasible plan to begin with. Supervisor Beattie felt this would be a great asset to the County with the numerous conditions imposed. Dr. Kelley, representative of the Los Padres Chapter of the Sierra Club made comments regarding the ''cabinas'' and the stipulation that no child living in one of the cottages and using that hotel as a residence shall be enrolled in any elementary or secondary schools. This seems to be completely inadequate as an occupancy condition - it is in conflict with other laws. It says nothing about families who do not have school-age children. Dr. Kelley recommended the appeal be upheld. Attorney Marc McGinnis spoke of social engineering which is effective in . various ways, economically and politically, As long as this is limited to recreational use as an acceptable use of the land under the general plan. He felt the Board should fix the time on the length of stay at this point. Later on amendments could be made if found necessary. He felt it wise at this point to take a step forward in social engi neeri ng. H. H. Divelbiss, Planning Director, said the Planning Commission talked about the length of stay and they could not come up with any time limit that made much sense, but they did agree on the necessity for turnover, . ~nd keep oc~upancy for a short duration. Attorney George Allen reappeared and made comments on the duration of length of stay. The condition as set forth in the Planning Commission conditions spells out fairly clearly that detailed records must be kept by the owner and a full report of the occupancy and turnover will be required annually, and if at that time there is any indication that it is not occurring in this manner, it leaves the door open for the imposition of additional conditions based upon the experience of the particular developer. he developer wants an opportunity .to work this out as a development as actually con- I structed and hopes to be able to have the flexibility to make this economically feasible. Regarding the Building Department's requirements, Wendell Nichols of the I rading Division of the Building Department said the preliminary plans have been checked nd mentioned that the pilings will be the foundation. H. H. Divelbiss, Planning Director said he had not had an opportunity to talk further with Attorney Allen, and pointe~ out that the planning people feel strongly hat the length of occupancy is not the only concern with regard to the schools but he length of occupancy was revealed as completely contrary to the recreational concept -. I 80 , September 21, 1970 It is felt this creates an entirely different reaction to the people in the use of the land and expense of govennment to provide services. There is a very important difference in the type of governmental services that the people would grow to expect if temporary rather than permanent. The planners have spent more time with the proponents than on any other project but have been unable to come up with a specific time limit. In referring to a paragraph on occupancy limitation in the conditional use permit, it was pointed out that it is the performance that the applicant comes up with during the year that is the yardstick with which to measure. If the occupancy is kept temporary with a lot of turnover, it is good performance. But the developer should have as much latitude as possible. Supervisor Grant agreed that if it is recreational development, short term occupancy should be encouraged rather than getting into permanent residential occupancy. Robert Deering of the State Division of Beaches and Parks, said they have met with Macco Corp. representatives in Sacramento concerning their plans, and the State Division of Highways on access points for the road development, and he said they object to their preliminary plan, and he went into detail on this aspect and the use of considerable beach park land for interchange and frontage road. They are asking the State Division of Highways to hold off on modification of the interchange and highway until they have completed studies on their new route (bypassing Gaviota Pass entirely). They are asking that all the planning be coordinated with all agencies concerned in order that mutually satisfactory solutions may be worked out. Fred Eissler of the Scenic Shoreline Association, indicated concern about the interior road. This is a big factor in determining the nature of the whole project - this should be a consideration prior to construction of the project. The whole situation seems to be whether or not it is a recreational or residential use. Recreational would be in accordance with the zoning and general plan but not residential. Mr. Eissler mentioned a change in zoning should the ownership of the land be transferred. They would hope the 100-acre zoning would reapply if this property is sold. Mr. Divelbiss replied that this question came up at the Planning Commission hearing and the conditional use permit must run to the land and should be suitable no matter who owns the land, to carry out the purpose. Richard Chrysler appeared in opposition to this development. This land is all undeveloped land with a natural untouched seashore which are very few in number today. If allowed to be developed, it could never revert back to its natural state - and conunercial zoning there is not needed. Supervisor Beattie said that half of this County is owned by the Federal government in open land and will remain as such forever Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject hearing be, and the same is hereby, duly and regularly continued to Monday, September 28, 1970, at 2 o'clock, p.m. when a full Board is expected to be present. ' - Approval of Minute September 21 , 197 Calif State : Migrant H a.1th Services Agreem t Contract No . 276 I September 21, 1970 Upon motion the Board adjourned sine die. T_!_l~ foregoing Minutes are hereby approved. 1 , J . LEWIS, County Clerk Meeting . Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, State of Californ-ia,- September 28, 1970, at 9:30 o'clo-ck-, a.m. Present: Supervisors George H. Clyde, Joe J . Callahan, Daniel G. Gran_!=, Francis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell; and J. E. Lewis, Clerk. Supervisor Clyde in the Chair In the Matter of Approval of Minutes of September 21, 1970 Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the reading of the minutes of September 21, 0970 meeting be dispensed with and approved without reading . In the Matter of Execution of Contract No . 276 between County * State of California for Migrant Health Services in northern Santa Barbara County (Santa Maria, Orcutt* Guadalupe), FY 1970-71, $61,213. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO. 70-597 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) Resolution este.bl'sh- In the -Matt-er of Resolution establishing final quantities of ing final que.niti _ on Project Santa work performed and material supplied for Water Transmission Line, Santa Maria County Mar i a Center; Wat.,., Transmission Line Center, Santa Barbara County, in the amount of $35,039.93. I Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, the following Resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO. 70-598 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) 81 82 September 28, 1970 Santa Maria In the Mat ter of Filing Notice of Completion for Water Transmission Line, Center Filin Notice of Sant a Maria County Center, Santa Barbara County . Gomnletion f r Water Trans- Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and mission Line ; carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Director Public Works be, and he is R/W !}rant Jane D. Joh et al I Exec Change Criers E. H. Haskell Co Asphalt Concrete Overla Surmnerland , Montecito lit: Carpinteria I hereby, authorized and directed to file Notice of Completion for water transmission line, Santa Maria County Center, Santa Barbara County by W. M. Lyles Co. It is further ordered that the Clerk be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to record siad Notice of Completion in the Office of the County Recorder of the County of Santa Barbara. tone, Basis by -In the Matter of Acceptance of Right of Way Grant Conveyed on Donation Jane D. Johnstone, et al, to the County of Santa Barbara for additional Right. of Way on Via Real in the vicinity of Padaro Lane, in the First District . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell , seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that a Right of Way Grant, dated August 24 , 1970, conveyed on a donation basis by Jane D. Johnstone, et al to the County of Santa Barbara for additional Right of Way on Via Real in the vicinity of Padaro Lane, in . . the First District, be, and the same is hereby, accepted by the County; and the Clerk be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to record said instrument in the office of the Santa Barbara County Recorder. In the Matter- of Authorizing Chairman to Execute Change Orders t9 Contract with E. H. Haskell Co . for Asphalt Concrete overlay for various Montecito, Summerland, and Carpinteria area streets; Job No. 1025. 2. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to execute the following Change Orders to contract with E. H. Haskell Co . for Asphalt Concrete Overlay for various Montecito, Sunnnerland, and Carpint eria area streets, Job No . 1025.2. N1mber 1, increase of $647 .01. Number 2, increase of $750.78 . Number 3, increase of $5,076. 00 . N1mber 4, increase of ~129. 92 . Number 5, increase of $1,471.06. Cancellatio In the Matter of Cancellation of Taxes on 1970- 71 Secured Roll on property of Taxes 197 - 71 secured R llacquired by City of Santa Barbara. City of S B ( Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell , seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, the following Order was passed and adopted: 0 RD ER WHEREAS, it appears to the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California, that the City of Santa Barbara, has acquired title to, and is the owner of certain real property situate in the City of Santa Barbara, County of Santa Barbara, and State of California; and WHEREAS, it further appears that application has been made for cancellation of taxes on property described below, as provided by Section 4986 of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California; and WHEREAS, i"t further appears that the written consent of the County Counsel and County Auditor of said County of Santa Barbara to the cancellation of said taxes has been obtained therefor ' ~ancellation of taxes 1964- 65 Sec )elinquent Roll Citv of S B ( September 28, 1970 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Auditor and/or Tax Collector of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California, be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to cancel the following taxes on the 1970-71 Secured Roll, penalties and costs applicable, against the property described below: 39-322-20 Code 2048 assessed to John H. Petras et ux - Cancel Land $22,200, Improvements $29,800 and Real Property Cash Value $208,000 on the 1970-71 Secured roll. The foregoing Order entered in the Minutes of the Board of Supervisors this 28th day of September, 1970. s/ J. E. LEWIS~ (SEAL) County Cler In the Matter of Cancellation of taxes on 1964-65 Secured Delinquent Roll, ed transfer of taxes to Unsecured Roll and cancellation of all penalties * costs applicable on property acquired by City of Santa Barbara. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, the following Order was passed and adopted: 0 RD ER WHEREAS, it appears to the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California, that the City of Santa Barbara, has acquired title to, and is the owner of, certain real property situate in the County of Santa Barbara State of California; and WHEREAS, it further appears that ~ppears that application has been made for cancellation of proportionate share of taxes on the 1964-65 delinquent Secured Assessment Roll for property acquired by the City of Santa Ba~bara, transfer of taxes to unsecured Roll, and cancellation of taxes on 1964-71 Secured Assessment Roll on property described below, as provided by Section 4986 and Section 2921.5 of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California; and WHEREAS, it further appears that the written consent of the County Counsel and County Auditor of said County of Santa Barbara to the cancellation and transfer of said taxes has been obtained therefor, . NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Auditor and/or Tax Collector of the County of Santa Barbaaa, State of California, be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to cancel the proportionate share of taxes on the 1965-65 delinquent secured roll and the transfer of taxes to the unsecured roll of: 39-231- 26 Code 201 on the 1964-65 Secured delinquent roll and the transfer of taxes to the Unsecured roll; Also for the cancellation of taxes on the 1964-71 secured roll, against the property described below: 28th day 1964-65 Code 201 Cancel Land $3,500 1965-66 Code 201 Cancel Land $3,500 1966-67 Code 201 Cancel Land $13,000 Improvements $400 1967-68 Code 200. Cancel Land $13,000 Improvements $400 1968-69 Code 2076 Cancel Land $13,000 Improvements $400 1969-70 Code 2076 Cancel Land $13,000 Improvements $400 1970-61 Code 2076 Cancel Land $13,000 Improvements $400 The foregoing Order of September, 1970. entered in the Minutes of the Board of Supervisors this 83 84 Goleta Valle Hous in,. Com.111 Inc r eq Cond Use Pe rmit I September 28, 1970 In the Matter of Planning Commission Recommendation for Adoption of Ordtee , inance on Request of Goleta Valley Housing Committee, Inc. (70-RZ~71) Amending Ordinance No. 661, to Allow for Revised Partial Development Plan Eliminating Condition for Covering Required Automobile Parking Spaces on Property located on West Side of Kellogg Avenue, approximately 100 feet north of Hollister Avenue, Goleta, Third Supervisorial District. A recommendation was received from the Planning Commission on September 23, 1970, for adoption of the above-described amendment. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that Monday, October 19, 1970, at 2 o'clock, p.m., be, and the same is hereby, set as the date and time for a public hearing on Planning Commission recommendation for adoption of an ordinance to amend Section 579 of Article IV of Ordinance No. 661, as amended, on request of Goleta Valley Housing Committee, Inc. (70-RZ-71) to allow for a Revised Partial Development Plan which eliminates the condition for covering required automobile parking spaces, Assessor's Parcel No. 71-090-49, generally located on the west side of Kellogg Avenue, approximately 100 feet northerly of Hollister Avenue, Goleta, on the basis of the Report of Findings and Recommendation as set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. 70-99; and that notice of said hearing be published in the Santa Barbara News-Press, a newspaper of general circulation, as follows: NOTICE NOTICE is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California on Monday, October 19, 1970, at 2 o'clock, p.m., in the Board of Supervisors Hearing Room, Fourth Floor, County Administration Building, City of Santa Barbara, State of California, on Planning Commission recommendation for adoption of an ordinance to amend Section 579 of Article IV of Ordinance No. 661, as amended, on request of Goleta Valley Housing Committee, Inc. (70-RZ-71) to allow for a Revised Partial Development Plan - which eliminates the condition for covering required automobile parking spaces, Assessor's Parcel No. 71-090-49, generally located on the west side of Kellogg Avenue, approximately 100 feet northerly of Hollister Avenue, Goleta, on the basis of the Report of Findings and Recommendation as set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. 70-99. WITNESS my hand and seal this 28th day of September, 1970. s/ J. E. LEWIS (SEAL) County Clerk It is further ordered that the above entitled matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the County Counsel for preparation of an appropriation ordinance. Quitclaim De d In the Matter of Execution of Quitclaim Deed from the County to Mark J. f r om Co to Mark J . Smit , Smith, et ux, Whereby County quitclaims any Interest it may have in Parcels of Land et ux - September 28, 1970 in connection with Agreement of September 21, 1970, Dedicating Access Driveway, Tract #10,376, Unit 1, Fifth Supervisorial District. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized to execute a Quitclaim Deed dated September 28, 1970, from the County to Mark J . Smith and Dorothy W. Smith, husband and wife as joint tenants, whereby County quitclaims any interest it may have in parcels of land as detailed in Agreement of September 21, 1970, dedicating access driveway, Tract #10,376, Unit 1, Fifth Supervisorial District . It is further ordered that the Clerk be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to record said document in the office of the Santa Barbara County Recorder after receipt of $4.00 payment, which is also outlined in the Agreement. , Agricultural In the Matter of Recommendations of Planning Commission and Agricultural Preserves hearin~ on rezo ePreserve Advisory Counnittee for Adoption of Ordinances Amending Article IV of & Creation I Ordinance No . 661 to Rezone Certain Properties in Goleta, Santa Maria, and Guadalupe Areas; and Proposed Creation of Agricultural Preserves. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that Monday, October 19, 1970, at 2 o'clock, p .m., be, and the same is hereby, set as the date and time for public hearings on recommendations of the Planning Commission and Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee to adopt ordinances amending Article IV of Ordinance No. 661, as amended, of the County of Santa Barbara, to rezone the following properties, on the basis that they conform to the General Plan of the County, and to approve applications to create Agricultural Preserves on said properties under the provisions of Chapter 1443, Statutes of 1965, known as the California Land Conservation Act, from a land use standpoint, on the basis that they conform to the criteria established by the Board of Supervisors of Santa Barbara County: t'r l) I'-' 2) / / 3) / / 4) Goleta Valley Egg Ranch (69-AP-25) (69-RZ-60}, Goleta Wilbur S. Souza (70-AP-14) (70-RZ32), Santa Maria John B. Wineman (70-AP-27) (70-RZ-53), Santa Maria Will H. Wineman (70-AP-31) (70-RZ-58), Guadalupe It is further ordered that notice be given by publication in the Santa Maria Times and Santa Barbara News-Press, follows, to-wit: newspapers of general circulation, as NOTICE NOTICE is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California, on Monday, October 19, 1970, at 2 o'clock, p. m., in the Board of Supervisors Hearing Room, Fourth Floor, County Ad.ministration Building, City of Santa Barbara, State of California, on recounnendations of Planning Commission and Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee to adopt ordinances amending Article IV of Ordinance No. 661, as amended, of the County of Santa Barbara, to rezone the following proper ties, on the basis that they conform to the General Plan of the County, and to approve applications to create Agricultural Preserves on said properties under the provisions of Chapter 1443, 85 86 Extension & Renewal Leas btw r:o & Jam s M. Pollard , t al Office Space for Welfare Dept S M Statutes of 1965, known as the California Land Conservation Act, from a land use standpoint, on the basis that they conform to the criteria established by the Board of Supervisors of Santa Barbara County: 1) Goleta Valley Egg Ranch (69-AP-25) (69-RZ-60), Goleta 2) Wilbur S. Souza (70-AP-14) (70-RZ-32), Santa Maria 3) John B. Wineman (70-AP-27) (70-RZ-53), Santa Maria 4) Will H. Wineman (70-AP-31) (70-RZ-58), Guadalupe WITNESS my hand and seal this 28th day of September, 1970. I /S/ J.E. LEWIS , County Clerk ' J. E. tEW!S, County':Clerk and Ex-Officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors (SEAL) It is further ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the County Counse~ for preparation of the appropriate documents . ' ' . . " . . - ' I ' In the Matter of Execution of Extension and Renewal of Lease Agreement between the County of Santa Barbara and James M. Pollard, et al., to Provide Office Space for County Welfare Department at 219 East Cypress Street, Santa Maria. (Folio No. 520) Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute the Extension and Renewal of Lease Agreement, dated September 17, 1970, between the County of Santa Barbara and Vinson L. Pollard, Zilda Barca Pollard, James M. Pollard and Elaine M. Pollard, Lessors, to provide office space for the County Welfare Department located at 219 East Cypress Street, Santa Maria. The term of the extension is for a one-year period beginning October 1, 1970, with rental at the rate of $330 per month, for a total of $3,960 over the year life of the renewal. It is further ordered that the County Auditor be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to draw the necessary warrants, in the amount of $330.00 per month in favor of James M. Pollard and Elaine M. Pollard, for the rental payments. Said warrants shall be drawn upon submission of the proper Demand for Payment form, as submitted by the Lessors each and every month. Rental Agree btw Co & Pol et a l Welfare Dept off ice space S M at $220 per month 5 t In the Matter of Authorizing Chairman and Clerk to Execute Rental , rd Agreement between the County of Santa Barbara and Pollard, et al., for the County Welfare Department Office Space at 219 South Vine Street, Santa Maria, Fifth Supervisorial District, at the Rate of $220 Per Month on a month-to-month basis. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute a rental agreement between the County of Santa Barbara and Vinson L. Pollard, Zilda Barca Pollard, James M. Pollard, and Elaine M. Pollard, hereinafter referred to as ''Landlord'' to provide for County Welfare Department office space at 219 South Vine Street, Santa Maria, at the rate of $220 per month, payable in arrears on the first day of each calendar month, beginning November 1, 1970, on a month-to-month basis for a one-year period Fez~ , I Execution Adverti sing Contr act S B Fiesta FY 70- / Release of County Claims I It is further ordered that the County Auditor be, and he is hereby, . authorized and directed to draw the necessary warrants, in the amount of $220 per month, in favor of Vinson L. Pollard, Zilda Barca Pollard, James M. Pollard, and Elaine M. Pollard, for the rental payments; said warrants to be drawn upon submi.ssion 4 #~ of the proper Demand of Payment form, as submitted by the landlord each and every month. In the Matter of Execution of Advertising Contract with Santa Barbara 1 Fi~sta, FY 1970-71, not to exceed $5,000.00. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, the following Resolution was passed and adopted: Resolution No. 70-599 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Execution of Release of All County Claims for Damages to County Property Resulting from Vehicular Accident, in the Amount of $14.70. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute a Release of all County claims for damages to County property resulting from a vehicular accident, as follows: Emma R. Cheuvront, accident on August 5, 1970, damages in the amount of $14.70. It is further ordered that the Director, Department of Resources ~ Collections be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to deposit the draft received in full settlement therefor to the Road Fund. Res ~ Collections In the Matter of Releasing Director, Department of Resources ~ Colreleased from further Account lections from Further Accountability for Collection of Certain Delinquent Accounts ability of $110, 1 1 . 04 I in the amount of $110,101.04. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, this Board hereby determines that the following amounts are too small to justify the cost of collection, or that the collection of such amounts is improbable for the reasons set forth in the verified applications of the Director, Department of Resources ~ Collections, and it is ordered that the Director be, and he is hereby, discharged from further accountability for the collection of the following amounts, in accordance with Section 25257 of the Government Code. (Code 60) (LIST) Attached to following Page No. 88. I 87 88 , I ' I ' - ---- - ----- SANTA AHA G!NERAL HlJ SP lTAL l~Ol G ENT ACCOUNT ETcU FROM MAST MONTH END I NG 07/ 3 1/ 70 PA l' I ENT NA ,.1E --- - --~- PAYC.OOE( S ) L~ Si o ILLlhG ACCT . 8A LAf'lCE ABATE, NlCHOLAS PA UL 0 2 97 95 l 60 - ACOS TA,SUSAN SANORA 02 61 86 2 60 - __ ______ _ _ C_l_ 8_8_ 90_ 2 __ ____ ,_ ADhMS,RlCHARO LYTLE 03 04 &o 2 60 AGUl RRE , t'1ARIA F. 0 2 07 8 4 l -- Jtf (RO --- _ A LCAt'{_t~~A.t.E_~Tti~Rcc_ _______- -0'- 2 05 41 l _ _ Y(_~O AL ORIOGE.,ROGER- s. ' Ol 38 15 l 46-41 l! ~ AL.ONZOtAN.THONV --O"l.,.~3 S-24_l _ - --AL. VARAOO,~ARlO 00 ll 00 2 60 - . - - -- - --------- --- -- 0 1/16 / 70 0 1/3 1/70 0 1/31/70 - -- 809.65 - . 97.30 ---- 8.50 0 1/31/70 0 1/31/70 . 11/30/ 69 ---- 09/30/69 0 1131 /70:---- - 0 1/31/70 J-l ,-6.i 4; i 5 j i, &75.46 12.30 -. ~ -- 565.3!:i 29. 70 - --- PAGE l I OE LE TEv 07/31/70 07/31/70 0 7/3 1/70 07/31/70 07/31/70 '07 /31 /70 07/31/70 -01 /3-i-/70 0 7/31/70 - ~---- -- ----- - ------ AMSLER LAWR ENCE ANOERSON ,LEONA H Ol 96 4b 2 -2ts io ~o - ----- - 02 86 47 2 60 -------___ A_tiL~I~. . .t P'.t AR Y FR A_N,~S,__ _______O __2, 24 5 l,___,l,.___--=-"""--- (p 0 BAKER,ALLISON TEO 02 93 44 2 y{ (pO - --------- - . -- - -------------~-.,.--------1- aALLA N TI~ E,GEOR GE JOSEPH 62 42 01 f 60 10 /31/69 01/ 31/ 70 160.35 07/31/70 .07 / 3 l /70 - Q. 11_3.J1_1_oc.__ _ _ J i 9 41~ . 9d"---_---'ol 131110_ _ _ __ 0 1/31/70 a.co 07/31/70 0 1/0 2/70 83:-10 07/31/70 ----------- ~AR.T.liP_L.Qti~.-~_QjiAg_o_ _~ R !!. oi z.~ 91 l It.{_ 1tz_o-=----j.-.-1~o 1 3116_9_ ___ ---'~~~"'--o=_ _- "o1 I31.t 19c__ _ _ BART~O(OMEW,EOWARO ~;SR~ OZ )O 98 i y( {pt? 09 / 30/ 69 28.35 07/31/70 -------------BART Hoi.rit--tEw ;ceo?:"GE c. 0 23 0- o 4,_2_ __; .:r-&-0 ----------~B.~R_THpj.~OMEw,_p. ~- ~. 02 13 40 2 l.i 0 ~------=-=--=-=---'-"-=---r.!!. ------ --- BERN SiVlRGINIA MARV \. 03 03 60 .2 6lCE,J O HN-LiMAN-:--------,--03~03-34-Z ' - - _6~.A~_K_, R 1 TA_,__ ___________ _,O_l 32 oo l BOGGS,LANETTE 02 72 02 2 60 60 ;& 60 fl 60 BONN ELL t BE-VERL-V 02 ~-l -5 9-2--y{ t;;tJ- ___a OP.R_A_'(_0:1 BQJi_~_R,_,_T__ ________ _;Q.,.,l_6,='-- -0=-=3_ _2 _ j4__f t?O BO rr IAN 1, ANGE t.:o L. . Ol 36 59 2 26 ~O 10 ~ - - - - - ---- ----:------- --- 09/ 30/ 69 .13.00 07/31/70 10/--3 1--/6-9 ------9 4 -.5 0 - --0 '.7 /31/70 ---- 01/ 3 1/70 31. 5Q 011 IT110-- ----11;0-o 07/31/70 - 07/31/70 09/ 30-/ 6-9 ----- 0 7.0~- ---'0-7/3-1/70- -- Ol/3 1/70 23.15 ---- - - - 10 / 31/ 69 _O.J. L~ l L 7 o 10/31/69 ----- s. 50 55 07/31/70 07 /31/70 07/31/70 ' - - --------'------- --------------- --:------:--- - - - -- - SANTA BARBARA GENERAL HOSPITAL INDIGENT ACC OUN LETED FRCM MAS~ LE MONTH ENDING 07/ 31/70 PACE PATI ENT NAl-1 MRt-JO P~YCOOES 2tJ '+C W ~ ' LAST BILL ING ACCT.BALANCE OEL~TEU . - - - - -. - ------- BRACKE TT; J. FRANK o l 01 22 z - --- ------- 8RAOL EY,OOUGLAS 00 77 76 2 60 01/31/70 Ol/3 1/70 .02 - 07/31/70 07 / '31' 110 - 8RA05 TtlCK.,J.AC _K HENR_y ________ 93 05 66 2 _ 60 Ol/31/70 _ __ _ 1 8 .9~ _ 07/31/70 - - - -- ---------- BRENNEMAN,PATRICIA BR IT T'Ot.:, TON I t 02 ao a 1 2 02 86 40 2 oO 60 01/31/70 01/31/70 ll9 7Q 07/31/70 za; a5 0113f1-10 _BRO ~CHA_~ '- GRJ~9_Rj _________.O :3 Q_~ _] ~_2_ __ 60 ~---r-- .01/ 3 1/70 _______ ,ll. 75 ___0 1131/70 BROWN , OENN l S H 02 78 46 2 t,ef 60 BROWN , ROScR 1- fRANK 03 04 -34- 2 - 60 Ol/3l/1Q Oll31/7Cf 07/31/70 54; 50 "(i'1"/3'f:J 10 ----- ____ BROWN;RON.ALO B~----------'02 89 98 z- --60 ---t--- o l / 3 l/ 7 0~ ____ 22' 5Q ___ o 7 / 3 l /70:_ _ ___. BR YAt" T,J.AMES 02 07 28 1 01/ 3 1/70 / 6,40a.20 0113i110 ---------- 01131-110. BR YANT,WILLIAM c. 03- 0270- 2-. --60 ---r-----12 / 3 l / 6 q ----- a.sa ------:~.l.f.C_HA_N_A_l\(,~W~J_LL_(AM Q~9 8 5 2. v{_ ~'.'O:___J---~l Q / 3 l / =6-"--9 _____ !~ __ Q?: /3 l / 70 __ _ 8UOKA,COR1E ANN 03 03 46 2 60 Ol/31/70 . 07/31/70 ---- --.----------- --- - 6U DKA ,KENNE T~ p 03 03 45 2 60 01/ 31/70 .07/31/70 a.so a. ~Q __________. 6_URG_~tL_l_L_(LAri~J.~A.N_ ________ QL9,.e_,4_0.:_ __.l___.:6Q_ __- -f__._.____;:;O.~l_31/1.0 ) 1,1-~_q_,_.~_g ___0: 7_/./ll_ _ /.7_9,___ _ BURROW S,ROBERr t ',' 02 20 57 2 16 60 "ol/3l/7d 20."0Q '07131/70 -------~~~ CA BRERA~,GIL.8_-ER71' 01 88 40 i oO 12/3~/-69 53;75 07/31/70 CA OE . . . . . . . . . . --------- - .Q .L. . r.RON~."'-.P _________ ,O,_~ ~5 8_LZ~--6~oo!__ _- -1---l~OlL-:C.J:_ ____.l, , l_6!_Q.9. ___ ,Q]_/3 l, [10-_ _ - -------- CALOERON, JESUS CALLAWA-Y ,SA-NOR.A . . ' " 02 53 36 2 60 Ol/31/70 17.75 07/31/70 - 60 01/ 09/70 596.40 07/31/70 - 02 89' 07 l ---------~A.t~A.R.~O_,_G_lil~~B--l' _Y~-~---------"Q2 ~ 63 i -60 Ol / 3llL9:-____ ~3~ . 5.Q_ __. ,.0.c 7/31/~70=- --- CAf,PBELl.,OOROTHV 02 80 ~O l 60 01/31/70 / 2t522.00 a7/3l/70 ------ --- ------------- - ------ CARASSo ,evA 02 21 65 l 4fl 3/f too 12/31/69 "10.60 07/31/70 ___C .ARfLAs.~_Q Lo.u.1.,~_E-H~JiI A. ,__ ______Q .2 oo l.6_~~---'~o. ___- '._ __0 91 3 a/ 6 9 _ ____ ___;9.32 4 s"---_-"o;1.;~13_1_1~0 _ _ CASTANC:OA,MJCt-(AEL 01 20 91 2. -?;{ 6 0 0 1/31/70 43 . 05 - - ----------------------------------1---- _______ !-~- ---------- - . - - - ' . - SANT BARA GEN!:RAL HOSP ITAL INOlGE~T ACC OUN ET EO FlOM HAST MONTH E~OlNG 07/ 31/70 PAGE 3 PAllEN.1: NAM~ ---- MRNO PAYCOOE CS ;r BILLING Acer.BALANCE OELETEO CA$TELLANO$,ER1C 03 05 97 2 60 )1/31/70 CATON, LAWRENC~ 02 11 10 2 CAT0Nr .f1ARR.l~. T ~----------Q.2_~1 _l 1_2 10 40. {:;tJ )l/31/70 - l (}. 40 &, 0 ) l / 3 l / 7 0 CELANI, JAN 1 S CERVANTES, EM~A 03 05 14 l ~ ---- 00 56 36 l 60 )l/31/70 60 L0 / 31/ 69 ---- ---.-- . c ER VAN l'E.S t.R ~o(') Lf'tj :~R----,----03_gp 0 2.~l _ 60 ____ ) l / 0 211 a----- CHAP OE&. A INE.,HlJGH sa.:aAN 03 oo 66 i 60 l / 0.2/70 - 26.65 - 0.15 14.25 07/31/70 07 /31./70 07131./70 317.60 07/31/70 41e 1.1i 01131710 ---- ' .' . J 0 5 d ---.0 7 / 3 l / 7 d. ~ . J ~---~ f:ll6. 5d 01131/io I -- CL EAR WA tER ,"NANCY-,jANE 0 ie a l S l 46 60 i 13 i 110 ______ 13 s;1s---a113 i-110 f I I t . 1 I 84.0el ---07/31/70 1' , rt11 . ---- ---------CL t!"' RO~B ER'Y l uTH,.E=:.R;:_ ________o l __ 40_1?_2_ _6 0 ___. 0/3 1/ 69 ----- COFFMA~ MABEL 01 ~o 09 l 20 31 Io ~ l/ 31 /70 7~~d 07/31/70 --------- CO'LBURN,"C~IARLES w.: 02~1914--.1 --u1 h l;-- t l/31/1d'_ _____ 5:-s1---()7-131110 ____ ---------~QN_R,Al)~J1}.R_J!WE~J!!:.:~ _________ ;;0;;=2_ 0-=-6"--'1""'5'---"l"--_--'6-0:0-___~ l l / 3 J I. JO._ ___ ,/~l t 3'9 7. 3 0._ __.0 7 /3 l /70_ __ _ \ COOK , SHE ILA JAN'E oi 10 86 l 60 .0/3 l/69 2J4. ad .01 /31 /70 COROtRO .-HARlA~-p. 0 1 35 68 i. 60 ~ l/31/70 io:45 0 773-i/70 - ., .;.__ ___. .; ____C Q.~_I_O~~t'1M~~-----~------b~2~. 9~1:__7:~8~2'--__6: :0~-----;r l / 3 l / ]Q._ _____6 _1 !Q~d ___ o7 /31' /70_ __ ___, . CRAFTON;GEORGE w; 03 04 18 2. 60 1/31/70 l9.6Q 07/31 /70 'RANe,susAN-;-P.~~ : ----------.0--3-04-90-2--~60_ ___ __, l/31/ 70 ia~-1~ d'1/3T77o _____ _._ ___c _~J),Z_:,_:~~R~'HA:.M.! _____ _____. 0..1,__,i,"'-9'-~8-=-S-~1 ___3_ _ 1~ 19 ~ 0 9 / 3Q(_9_:J_ ____~ 4~~?.Q. __o r.(3l'/70_ ____ CRUZ,ARMANOO CASYRO ., \. 03 Ol l4 2 oo 2/31/69 29.95 07/31/70 t;:.J C.RUl,JESUS 03 Ol. 15 2 t.O 2/31/~9 29. 85 07 l3i-i10----. 02 19 47 1 ------------C.l.lfiTJ.S Mr c!i_!_E_L c; t 40 ll {.- ( . .!~9/3 0/ 69 58.61 '07/31/70 .': J ------- ----- ---~- 0 A \I IS, LES Li c' P . 60 1/3l/70 I 11057.20 07/31/70 . 't OAV Is, LONtfl E . ; 1131110 a.so 01131110. - , 03 06 34 2 ---------w:. f;~L_v_,:__ffi_~J,-1!~j(~_ ________ __0 _2 1_3 33 2 6-Q_ - l Ql3 l l.6-:9. :;._ _____4_:_ ~_,.,. _ ,2,_.o,~-~-QIlil.L1.=d- _ ___ OEALY,"E.THE.L. Ol 71 62. l ?Ji ~ 0 l131110 { 2,4a3~00 01131110 ----~ . SAN.TA BARBARA GENERAL HOSPITAL I-N-O. I-GE~-T -ACC OUNTS DELETED FROM MAST PAGE 4 MONTH ENDING 07/ 31/70 .P ATIENT- N.A ME --------M-R. NO P~YC~OElS)-L ASJ BILLING ACCT.BALANCE --O~LETEO DEL GIORGlO,.KATHLEEN s. 01 52 26 l 01/31/70 5.5Q 07/31/70 -------------- OENMAN ,ANNE ()3 0 3 3~ 2 - - - oO - ____ ,. 01131110 -- - - 3os.4a - 01131110 ___ otAl Jesus _. . -. ' . _, . - _____________ Q .2~2_LO_l. 2~ __ 6Q ___ ___ 12/31/69___ - - 39. 50 _ ~01 /31/70 _ __ --I . . 02. 16 49 2 4fi too 01131110 zcr.,a 01131110 ,/ -) - ---- OlE:80LrJ,EL\~OOO 8ANARO 03 02 49 2 60 12/31/6'3 -------9 . 80 P113lt16 _________ PQQso_N,_QAN_tE.L:._F: ______ _ __ Q.3 04 o9 ~z ___6 o_ ____ o i 1 3 1110 _____3 0. ia_ _. -:'ot 1'f; 1110_ __- -t DOMlNGu~t.~RN~Sr . b3 OS 68 2 ~6 01/31/70 53.90 07/31'/70 . QONAL.OSON_,WENl)'y . 03- 05672 60 ______ oi13i110 '.'t"3-~~-5Q (j"'1/31/7o I .__ ________O . U. LA.F. . ._f , K -.A-TH-Lt. -E;;;.'_N.;_ .;;:t;.~ ---------=~2 _ 9_7_ _ __,2 S- i.' ---60- ---. +-- 01/31/70 -----'35;43- --P'-'11--3-1-.i-7-0- ----1 02 46 35 z co 0. 11 31110 ~s. as '07./31110 0,Y E;'R,EOI:rti-All;E.~N-: _________ oi,.6. 8-7~1--,~~.,-----,-6~0,_,- -------- 12/31/69 2. 75 07/3~1~/70 ----------~-SC.O_B,AR~t~SAMUJ:.\. .' _._ _____: .___ _ ;o0_3._Q9J.Q_.le _ _;60._ ___, __~o_i.&~ltQ__ ____ :.1.-:~=:~~'-----Q1 /~.l:L79"'".- ____ . . . 'Oi 0 1 2s 2 01. . 24 22 2. 60 01131110 io . oa 01131 110 c;o i2-1311 69-----~.ia .-oo Q1.131110 _________F .~E ~! :6 t.MAR.'ItlC.E.kTHA E~ F !"GU.ERO A, I SAS et: 02 24 2.,_4_2._ _~ i__,1,-,.-or_ _- -1-~0~l_L3.l.LLO' ______lt: i.:A~~s Ot.i.~. .i ~LLO~ ---- 03 01. 70 i 60 01/02/70 "j3i".2d 01131:110 ---------- -. - - - - - -.,.,-,--------------c------,----.-- ---1-- FORa es, oee s~ . o3 06 ss 2 60 011 3i110 41:-~a 011317 10 \ . _________. fO.WL.E.R~:t.MA.R. l L_y_l4 ___ ,P _.;._ __ _ _____ .0. .2_ _.J_Q 49 2 .6 _Q,__ __1 -- O_L.l _3_i1.1 _0 1_0 it"2~. -___ _,Oi/:iiJr.1'!~0:____ __ FREEMAN-, IMI\ JCAN '\, ()f 08 24 2 if 00 ll/30/69 '40.95 .01131:110 ----- ---- - --- ---.,---~---------------~----------- - - GALL,e;wANOA F.: Pl 06 71 2 60 Ol/3l/1Q .24. :t.s 07/31/70 . __________ G,AP.NA.J ~Q.~S.~_ t1A~I A. ."--'- ----------'b"-0~, 9 L.~5 ~9_2~ ___ :6;:0_ ___, __!1! ~.{-~J~:.9:_ _____. 3: :;;.~ ~~1'-a' _ __o ~?_I ~')~ l .1.:c_ou_ ----'-- . GAR.C(A, RciSiE' MAR'I"E 02 39 68 1 60. 01/31170 J i~1 1d. 1Q . ---------G-AR C iA.,~JO S~~R 0-8.-.l-f.-S -. --------b2.~5-9_2._l,. _l.,--.,.,6.0---- _.- +-109130-/6 9 j ( , " 6-7. Ocf ________G ~APC~IA.1J.: to_iA.__ _;._. __. .:_ ___ _,.b_LU 92_ \. __~ _h:;_o_--'-_J.:lo_l.L.~1110 i '! 4,--4 5 G'ARClA.,"OFROC.'lNE 9Q '76 36 i 4/ 60 ol-/31/.10 345 . 1Q '07 /31./70. 'iJ 7 . /3i-. ,7-0 011-:,. 110 :o1 /3l.l70 I I --------------- ,--- - - - -- - - S AN TA BAR BAR A. --- IN- DIGENT ACC DELETED FKOH ~STE:RFILE PAGE - I ' GEf-J ERAL HO SP ITAL MONTH ENDING 07/31/70 - PATIENT NAME GARRE TT,.STEVEN COYLE GEANEY,DENNlS M; ------- - PAY CODEC l 03 01 33 l 60 - 02 26 11 1 60 LAST BILL ING ACCl.SALANCE -- OE:t.ETcO 480.35 ____ ~--- _ _GONZAL.E s_,: YQL.ANO-\ --------_.;01 39 24 2 01/31/70 01/31/70 01/31/70 ----- ll.75- - 07/31/1 GRAY ,H1LOA Ol 39 32 l 60 12/26/69 8~7 .72 GUAROAOO,AUUREY 03 02 85 2 60 12/31/69 -22~z5 07i3-l/f. ' G.T lEP.B.E'Z. t.AOr~AlN ._ ________0 ,2~4 16 1__ _ 3J{_ [yo_ __- '---'~11/.30/69 _____2 40.oa_ ____o 7 /3117 HAL~~RSON~JOHN ~~. 02 l8 53 ( 60 01/02/70 ~z1~1d ~7/31/7 . H.A.NSoN;:.juL1'us 1. 02- 633i i 4/ bo- -091:;016-9 a.so .0"113-111 - _________ !iARR_l_ S,~Q~~~El,L_ s. : ------------'-=0-2 -92 16 l" --60 --~--'--~-01/31/70 ------517;70- --01/31/7 ~ARR IS, tR EGOR~ N; Ol 06 06 2 ~6 01131110 s~so 0113111 --------- . HAUS;EtiGENE 01 86-23-l~- 3/ h0 09/30/69 9:-5Q 07 /3.17-1 _________t1 A_t,"tt.E.f\l.1Afi _______ ____~ Qp Oo_Q5_2~_ _6 _0____ ______ _:d_~ 1_3_!_.1 1;o.=-------""""'2:.ooo.~?.-O='--_ __.q__11_3.~L? H'EATON ;eR f'~ o~ 04 96 i 60 H~ No ER so-N-,ALt NE _________o 2- 6s-.o -.t,--a~-2 --:--:1/ &:,a _ ________ ___,HE~Q.f{J.CK 1.tfAR~_Y :M:i'----'-------0~2 96 46 2 60 Oi/31/10 01 /31 /7 0113i110 l-1-s':-a(J 01i311 o i.1_ p_1-1'- "1"- -o"- -_____1 Q . 6o.:; .___ ._0113! 1 HEREOIAtSALVAOOR 02 23 06 1 iy &:.o 09130/69 J z:;o24;1.0. 011311 -. ---------H-ERNANp(t,~JOE-,:-.- -------- 02 oo 65 2 60 10/31/69 ~6,2_o ___0 7/3I7- _________) 1.t:R_NA_Np)z.:.:.f1A_R~-~.". z--------~0~1~0~~2~0=3__,2.___ ___Q:;_O._ _~ ----~o l_l 3~1~:'- =1-.o:;_ _____ .;1"' -4'~._a_g .07./3 l / HERNANDEZ ;R (CHARO 00 96 88 2 60 12/31/ 69 17 . 7S 07 /31 / HE s s, oi-lr-iA-. ~.J--.-.-----------o 1_4_2 _2a__,2.,----~60 ________ 0i 13111 0------a~:s_o ___ o 113 f / ___________t1 _l~K~i.J. ACJ( BA l ls~ Y 03 Oo O2 .,___.l,=---~60-=---~-----o ~ 13~ 11 . O.:., ___ ___ __.ft:i3 2~ .;7.5=;___ _:07 /31 I H08BStOANf.fY 'f 01 12 56 2 60 01/31/70 .2s.cfQ 07./31/ - - --- -- - ---------- ----~----,. HOPKlNS . R.AVMONO .A; 03 03 66 t 60 'Ol/3l/70 :41:~~7cJ :o_113J'1 ---------:-t1PJ.LS_fj)fu_.SJLSA.tL.Jli_~1~----------.:Q.3_Q2 9 L 2_ --=o-""'-0-~-----~l2, .0_1/6 9 11" l_O, ,__ __ .:o=7:z/}. 1:t. HUNT,OONALO BLACKWELL 03 03 20 2 60 12/31/6~ li . 65 -------- ~ \ - - ------ SANT A ARA GENERAL HOSPlTAL PA_T_I.EN.1 _N_AME . . - HUNT, J OHNN 1 E - e J~OIGENT ACCOUNTS DELETED FROM MAST MONTH ENDING 07/31/70 .ttRNO PAYCOOE(S "re 30 0o HUN TtR, J C 26 l l- (oO ---- -~- -- .JN DA, ~O SA. -~------- 02 46 17 2 00 58 60 l 0.2 10 08 2 ~._ __ . . . ---- 60 INOA,ROSA CARMEN IRWIN, WESLEY 8. -- 02 72 63 2 60 LAST BILLING ACCT.BALANCE - l 7. 90 J ~ ;301.-62 ------ 43.45 136.50 -- PAGE 6 OE LE TEO 07/31/70 0 7-j 31-110 07 /31/70 07/31/70 -o-11-3i/10 -- \ --------~J IMENEl,~1AR.JA __________ _:00 6q_ _t2~~ 60 - - 01/31/70 12/31/69 12/31/6';! 10/31/69 01/31/70 0 l/3i'/10 ----246. 55 __ 07 /31 /70 _ _. - ------- JOHNSON, G~~ ~v 'lee 02 14 77 2 60 JOHNSON ,LOI~S- V. . 02- 9& 39- 1- 60-----I ---------- J0HNS0t~,REN~GAIL _________ Ol~2 57 2 60 ll/30/69 - cf113-i 110 I - - - -n 3 t ~'12. 7~ 07/31/70. 0113-1-110 Ol/31/70 _____ 43. l0 __ _.07 / .31/70 _ _ -1 JOHN SON ,s TE VEN 02 99 l g 2 60 12/31/69 18.SQ b7/ll/70 ---------JOHNSTON.,GAIL- LINOA 01 83632 vf Ga-- -0310116iJ 21.50 01131110 ___________ J_ONE $1~.L-~IB-'-~----------~6~ . .Q.4 37 2 00 _ Q~D.-~.110=-- ------- 9.: i:~'---"07 /31./7Q _ ~'---~~--~-- J ONES.JOHN HEt~P:v oz 99 83 1 60 01/31/10 J lt2l3.-a5 07 /31'/'10 JURl.OVICH,OAVlOM--_. o2 88 45 1 60 01/31/70 76.50 07/31i70 -----:------ ~-UR_U_S,_ELL._~N_ ___________ _OYJ U_tl _,3"'-9-~1" --~6.9_ ____. __ _~ 2l3_lL~9 J l .I 412 9 ?~--0=-7,_,/'-"3' 1/79~-- ~ATENKAMP,KARL 01 b4 92 l 60 01/02/70 l '03 . 2 S 07/3117~ -:--------- KEEHN, MARY 0.2-.- ~630--=2-_- -60_____ ol/3l/7Q 6 7;-JQ p1-T31 i10 ---:----------!K EtiQ. .E t A J' '\. GE _ l.!A_ 1.1.J" '' ----------~02_'t.Z._2_2--"2"- __i t_~ o__ __. 1-----1=-=l_I J0/ 6 9 !.2_g :Q.7-L31110 _ _ tELLEY,PERRY R. t3 04 49 2 60 01131110 24.oo 01131110 ----------KEPPELE R,- M-1 -CH AE L J. 03 04 i.O 2 6()---- 01/31/-70 24.50 07/31/70 _________ .K ~RJS.sB. l~~ L~~UtA.eE TH 01 59 3 9,:;,-.2=-----Y6. 6 0 _______ o 91~ Q 169:,__ _____ J1 ~ 3 Q _ _ _.co113111.:_:o:;___-1 _________ l .AMAR . OAYNA ,. 02 43 55 2 y ~o 09/30/69 44.ld _ _ o_7/3l/70 _ LANoERs,sASIL f~ 02 46 ~o -1 00 01131110 7 5,320.9s 01131110 _________ l.ANJ;. ., t i~J'i~.Y . QZ 09 5-6=-!'Ll- -;1-hO_ __ .----Ql/_ll,./!-~7.0~------=-7 ~3 Q ~-4.!,.__ _.o ~~7 w/3~l~l.7.:._0--:._ _ 02 68 o~ LANE, JOHN 2 60 0)131110 a~so ~1131110 , --------------------- SAN T A BAR BARA GENERAL HOSPITAL 1N01GENT ACCOUNTS DELETED FkOM MASTE MONTH ENOlNG 07/ 31/70 PAGE 1 ' - --------- -----~--- PATIENT- .N AM.E --~---- MRNO - -- PA.Y COOE{ S-)- LAST BILLING ACCT. BALANCE - OE LE TEO LARSEN ,KATHER 1N L. 03 04 0 1 2 6-0 01/31/70 si.9o 07/31/70 ---- LEA SURE , J OHN l -; - - Ol/31/70 90. so -- 07 /3i/ 70 01 49 48 2 L E1'4 P_HERE.t~EQ ------------0~ _Q6 lQ_ _l 60 - ~-- ---- - Ol /31/7 0~ ___ 210. 05 ___ 07131 /70 __ _ l EON , JUAN VllLA 02 63 47 2 60 LEYVA,OON 02 99 20 2 60 l0/3l/b9 12/31/69' ' )58.-~5 07/31/70 23;10 o-1i-3-i 110 J .;v.vA,_K._E_~I.N 02 99 19 2 60 - l2/3l/69_ __ __~ 33. as ___0 7/31.'/7Q ---------,,. ------' - -- ------ - ----- '------ l EYVA, L 1 SBE'l'H oz 99 23 z lO 12/31/69 .l't . SO :01131/70 LEVVA.,MAUR-IcE Ol99 24- 2. 60 1213i/69,_-- ----4b;6"5 --0173-f/7-o - ---------L 'IosrER,RO'OER'.lC._K_A_."--_ _ _____ 02 15 O~.__ yl loo___ ld/31/69 ______ _ 5.50 _ _ _;.07/31170_. ---- . LIGON ,MELVIN b3 08 05 2 60 dl/31/ld zs;ao b7/31/70 lIPFORO ALBERT.A Ol 83 - 40 2 2b 30- 00 --- 01/3.1/70 22-.-4~0 --07/31170 _________ i, 1__ r _rLEL:JO ~g_"p --"Hc.i_w:=t""L"~_l:A:.:14.:_ _____~ 0~3~0~5:.7!.~4-'2~ .:. _--2_6~o _:__ ___o l [3 !LJo_ ____~ l 3._4~5 ___ _;o: 1131110_ _._ _,_ LOIBLl:,_.JESSE oz 32 50 2 '}d 6o 12/31/69 5.50 07/31./70 --------- - - - ---- --- - LOP EZ.,RO'SA 'L.lNOA 02 42 46 z {JO 12/31/69 2341'15 07/3.1170.,.---- ---------i,:q_~_E:.,.c_~:(.tj.Y o 2 32 63__ _- z= -_ __,~fo_o~-----=l2l3J/6CJ 1~.~5_q __ o1131110_ ___ . LUCERO.,OAtilEl. ~ . 01 74 1_0 t 1' fuO 01/31/70 .is:.1d 07/31/70 ----------MAC- OON_ALO;w1L'l:'IAtf1i-.-.--------,fl 21 6'9 l. 60 01731/-76 fr;21.-s-.-55~--07/3I.i7o=------ _________f i~O_Q~.N~L.~O_J_TH oz 42 os 1 26 lQ__~t/- -~O=.l.,J1-21~/-'7--0"_ ______a ~_l5 0!/3.l_/79__ __ MAORIGA,L.ROSA. PE'RE.YRA '\02 56 38 z ~ 00 01/ 31/70 '3z2.oa 07/31/70 - MAGOALENO., GEOR.GE 02 94 ll 1 60 Ol/ 31/70 I 2,a~1~.2a .o'ii3f1io ---------fi~_l_N.t.~l.~NL_~ ~AV O_? 63 81.~Z.__ _ y(__t,_a_ ____ Ol / 3 1/7_9_ _____ 5.00_ __ 0_7/31/70_ __ _ MALBAS,FELIX l~ . 02 58 Ol l f h0 11/30/69 621.40 07/31/70 - --. ----- MARASco,NATALE;--------------:b- 2_ 4_6_ 49 _ l ___ ifl_& () Ol/31/70 176.~Q 07 /31/70 --------MA R.Q_U~z~ .~ !:4-U~l__R~~B. Q.2 tt_9 ~-1 '-&o '""---- ----.-Q.l l~l_l_.1._0;. _ ____2 _g_1. 8Q __- -=OJ.Ll.1.ll-O=_ __ MARQVEZ'.,MAR.i ~ose 02 49 73 1 Y1' (po Ol,/31/70 '485 . 65 07/3l/70 - ------ - _.,__ SANT A BAR BARA GENERAL HO SP ITAL lN OlG. ENT ACCOUNTS DE L ETED FROM MASTE PAGE 8 MONTH ENDING O'l/31/ 70 ---- ---- --~ ---- --~---- ' --- ------- --------- . \ I . . PATIE t~l' NAME MRNO PAYCOOE(S) LAST BILLING ACCT . BALANCE OE LE TEO . - - . ------ -"--- MARTIN,PATRlCIA . 01 34 09 2 60 MART IN, REYNARO 01 86 96 2 tO ~.ARJ.1.N.E_~tMARY LOUl_S~ ________ Q l _9-3_ _5 ,Q 2 __ 3Y &0 - 1-\AY ,Ct-IESTER LEE Ol 38 73 l 31: Ht - (.t:JO -- ,AY,KAiUKO (i2 13 32 - l 60 -- MC All I ST~R, ~f\: 1.,1,__ ________ Q 3_Q~-0~_2c.,___ 60 _____ _ M' fARlINtERN~St (; MC GO.WAN , suSAN- c . 03 06 59 i. '60 01-73-a 7 1 60 MEO INA_ RAMO~;,_ _ - --'-________o r_4 1~56_1___ _6 0_ ____- '1 _ Ol 49 44 1 60 \ 01/31/70 01/31/70 - 14.85 01/31/70 z so; 2 s 01131116 11/30/69 ______ 121.ss __ 01131110 ___ _. 09/30/ 69 171.80 07/31/70 10/31/69 941.55 0113 i.'110 " 01/31/70 43.50 07/31/70 -----~ ---- ----- 0l/3l/70 ~2.~5 07/31/10 12/31/69 zas.oa Q"1.i3I110- Ol/31/70- ---J-i:,631.00- --0'7/31/70 ---- MELERO ,GU.ILLE~MlN~ 01/ 31/70 543.90 07/3i/70 MENO ISLES,-JUANA 00 98 74 2 60-----t- Ol/3fi70 i07. 45 --o-1-1-s1-116 _________. M ~~()Ql_Ai_ M.CU~~E S -v_t._ --------~Q1_~6 49 2 60 - -01/31/70 4 a. l 5,___ __.;01131110~--- M~R JIL,JuA~ p; 03 03 59 t 60 01/ 31/ 70 a.so .07 /3 l /70 Mi:RR. ITT ,JOSEPJ1e.,.,, --------03-0~S-7,.- l---60~.-----l--01 / 31 /70 '5'28.35 07/31./70 ---------t"~f~~lT_T_t.l .eS_L.lJf_ _________~ o__ i_._15- 7 2_:. .i __ 6!!.0~ ____ _ o:._:WQ_/._7z.:0:;._ ____ .,~~t.~~~5-_ ___ ;o"'-7'_1_?.11.J9""'-'- -- MESSICK ,LISA -:.: ()'3 02 35 i 60 l2/3i/69 tr.so 07 /31/70 ,.,- ILHOA.Nt.8RA_O_A' :.- ---------b~o5,-0._,3,, 2_ __6_ 0,--------d l/ 3T/-70------3~ .a 5 0.7 /31-/70 \ ___i 1 l.L t;O~~(,)=s~~-N~_L,_- ----". .;'="- "-"'_ __ ,Q._U -9 4 4 ~---.':!6!.,~o _ __ ;___;'-t--0-""-l' l p_l=/-1';.0.;:;_ ____ ;-:a;.~7 5 ~1/. 3.1I10._ __ ___ MillERtEO.vJARo 'JbHN 03 06 45 2 60 01/31/70 ,43 . ld 07/31/10 Ml LLER~-~1ARY ANN 0 1 79 5 1 f 4:/6o Ol/3i/70 ______ 76CJ . 93, 07/3l/70 . __________1: '1_lNO_$f. . LS.QN~lE,-.__________ _ -9=.~ 88 12 2 O~-----t--O_l / 31 /70 '3~.~l.9,._:- --"o_7J_3 1/7'-0'--._ _ _ MORAN.,RAMONA . oo 53 53 2 60 Ol/ 31/70 57 . 40 MORENO ;v 't'ONNE s.: Ol 56 36 i 1/-ft/0 ------- 09/ 30/69 .461. 05 07/3l/70 07 /31 /70 "'( . . ---------- ~U~P-~. JJAN--'-----'-------CL4-~1._~._.,._2 _ ~6~0---~~-o~~l=/~7~Q"-------=-~,2~.~5 ___ 0~7~/.1.~L7~0 _ _ fitUSC.t11K.,L.1NO,\ 02 93 97 l 60 0 l/ i6/70 07 /31/70 ----~~ - -- - - ~ --- - --- _. -- - . - . t ---- - - --- - - SA~T A RA GENERAL HOSP ITAL. - INDIGENT ACCOUNTS ED F~ Ot'1 MA~TE' MONT~ ENOING 07/31/70 PAT I l:N T _NA ME ------'-- MRNO PAYCOOELS 1 . - - NEWBY , MAUR lCE Ol 43 86 2 ----------- () l 41 21 l LAST BILLING ll/30/69 09/30/69 ACCT . BALANCE 106.45 -- 591;25 PACE 9 OE LE TEO 07/31/70 07 /3i./70 ---- -------~- NQRTCJN ,JA Mc~ ----------- Ol 87 __ 6~- 2 __ 60 ---01/ 31/70 105.05 07/31/70 -- -- -- ----1 ' -------- OLMSTEAO , RAY H.111 03 06 28 2 60 PACtiECO,A.tJGUSTiNA 02 '16122 26 W. {;O - 01/31/70 10/3l/6 q ____ - 07/31/70 0113r110 p A INE, JJ.JD 1 ftf "(.-'- ---------.-:0.2_ 27_ ~2 _ l __6. 0 _____ _ 01/31/lO . 12,270.25 07/31/70 ~------' --- ~---- PA lN TER ,OAN I El" sre VE'N 02 95 60 l 60 PAR I Srf, MAR" J.YOPER' oo~72.-5S-l 60 PARK, KENNE Tl:L L;_R.,O.~V--------~02_?3_16_1 __4 0 11 fo.0 PARKER, 6URNE1"T PARRY , C HR 1 Si I NA -MAR. I A 00 86 6 7 1 02~2-8-71 2 lll:t.tJA.N.OY CAR(AN.e~ -------~OL90 79 2 PEOGONAY;JOHN s . JR. 02 2l 37 2 60 -37 60 60 60 01/31/10 5Q4.40 P7/31/70 . _____ - . _ -- - 01/02/70 683. 45 01i 31110 09/30/69- ----154.0Q- - -07/3(./70 - ----~ 01131110 930.~s 01131110 li./30/69 5~50 07-73-177-6 0 l / 3 l / 70__ __ __~ 3. 6 5_ __0 7 /3 l /70-'---___ _ 01/31/70 175.35 07/3.1/70 - - - .-,~~--------- PINKSTON, ERV l ~ ~; 02 68 38 f ff-60 io13116J i'.Li.oa 0-1-131-110~---- _ ________ _.:P. ~ QL_K.1_0_QY.~l_IB._~_LN~----------O-~ 58 08 2 Y"-4. o. '"---i.--1.Q ~ 3 !.lE':J_ _____1, i 1__ s ____o 1 131110_ ___ PRESCbT1,.SH(RlEj E. Od 51 03 l 01/30/70 J 3,368.90 07/31/70 PROWE~~~J~~i~.~~.---------0-z-9-~~9-1_ ___6 0-----~-0l/3070 l~~~;~Q ~7lI7~o \ ---------.:~lJ_qh-;._~~O~( ______ _. ~_. ~'"--.".';.;;;;.- -~02 31 so 2 60 1---_.:;1; 11~016_9_ ----~10.J.9.__ __~ oJ 131110_ ___ f\AKOWSKl,ANlTA CLAl~E- 02 44 53 Z 60 01/31/70 14.50 '07 /31 /70 ------- -- - RANK!N;WILLIA~ 03 b6 96 l ~O 01/30/70 265~25 07/31/70 -------~-- ~e~p~p.__RO~~~Q_E=~ _________0~ 3=-;0=3c.__4.;~0-=l- __~ 6~0-----'--i----Ol/16/70_ ____6 36.ao_ __0 7/3l/70~--- REITER,W IL(IA~ H. 03 04 95 l 60 01/16/70 213.ZQ 07/31/70 , a ' B~E_X.E.S, fjJ~J~_TwY_. s-___ . _______ __:Q.2 ~9 2.9.'--"2"___-'6,.0:.-____i --_O:. l_l3_l .l.- :7_0_ ____~ 4_6~-4-=-.7. .3., .___ _ ~o 7 /JJ._j_ 7_0'----- ' REYES,LlJIS CAR&.o:s 03 00 03 z 60 12/31/69 Q7 /3 l /70. - ----- ------1 - - - - SA AR BARA I NDIGENT ACCO DELETED FROM M E PAGE lO - GENERAi. H05P1 TAL MONTM ENO l NG 07/ 31/ 70 ----- --------~ ----'----- ' PA TI ENT NA.ME RtYES, t-\AR INA ----~- -- -------- MRNO - PAYCOOEC 01 41 d8 l REYES , RAQUEL P. I CHf1R OS , C ER tR U.D E 0 1 24 09 2 60 ____ ____ 03_0L_96_ l __ 60 RI CHAROSON,CHARlES g; 02 62 67 l R I DLEY , E.SRANOI.L YWN - 03 07 85 l 60 LAST SILL ING ACCT . BA LANCE DELETED . ---1 07/~l/70 (j'713't 176 - - l 0 /3l/6q 0 1/31/70 __ 01/30/70 ____ _ 10/31/69 01/31/70 ---- 106.50 . eo.05 . 221.10 01/31/70 911.45 118.95 ---- 07/31/70 01 131110 R_ l o.s,~.OHN T! ___________ 03 03 3-3- l __ 60 ___ .___ Ql/31/70__._ _~ 502.20 _~ 07/31/70 - - ---I RIPP ee , JA'ME s o:. 00 85 0 7 l 60 Ol/31/70 / .1,s11;a5 01131/10 ---- ------R08ERS(1N',GLA'b vs. _________0 2 64 -88 - 2 01/31/. 70 3. -00 o7/3I 110 ~OB IN SON ,"JOHN ~C~~--------~02___69__2J_l 60 09/ 30/ 69 590.40 07/31/70 i.-- ----- - - - -----1 -- ---1 ROO I NSON ,JOHN W. 03 OS 73 2 60 Ol/ 31/70 5d.05 07/31/70 ~ODR I QUEZ ,~lARl-A e "' ; oo- a2- a1- 2 60 Ol/31/70 ______ 4.54.45 07/3-f/70 _________R .,Ot10 ,j_4_s_~:vA_L,' _______ :.:;",:.~=:.. ____ _JQ.2_ _8 5 5 3_?_ _~ 6_Q:___-11--~QJ.L3_l~l~7,.:;0_ ____- "l'-0_? .l 9o.-_ _ Q_7_/3~119' ---1 ROSALES HERMAL:tNOA ; - . 01 so 44' l .;1 10- ~ 09/30/69 ia.oo '07/31/70 - -------- ---c.-------- ---- ---. - --''--11 ROSAS,O(IVfA 02 63 aa 2 60 10/31/69 102~30 b7/31/70 --------~ uI l ,_GR~~CJE~l.A_ ________ __;O!ilJ2.~~u51_\!07.L._2"--__1 6 :___ __ j--'Qll1i/-!1~0_ ____~ 7 .-:2 5 ou.~_l/_70:__ _ RUSSELL,.JAM'E's w. 03 05 19 2 60 01/31/70 2s.20 01131110 SANCHEi;'~iOSE Pl'ZANO 02 76 oa l 60 Ol/ 3l/70 J 'e-;350.15 .0.7/3l/70 __________ $.At~ C)1ez:Li(O:.eE.:I.A L' ') .:I~ . . 'OlLOZ.L10 231 40 011~.1110~-- __ ______. j!_fo~il L.-".- "J~-9~lc-_~6_0._ ___ j---=- .'!!:------ --"-"'------.:. sANOOVAl,.RA.UL. 02 75 70 z 60 12/31/69 3a.35 07/?,l/70 SCHwlNtOAVIOJOHN 03 04 42 2 60- 01 / 31/70 66.50 01/31/70 ---------""~.CU_G,i_I_N.tQ.AWf'i 11b.R.1E ' 03 05 15-. -2- ------'6 o 1---Q.1./~.J l:7:_.0:,.__ ____- -=l2.~3_q _ ~o7/31/70~-- ----~ 02 21 1s 2 ;1 bo io13 l/69 3.20 SEFlCK,M!CHA- E-l -:----------- ~; b3 07 81 2 - 60 O l / 3 l / 7 O 12. 3 S 01I3 l I 1O ---------~s E&.EN.~.tlf_A.B1A1' Q. . .L-. _.-,; _____. .;.,_ __ ~OJ 03 6 7 z_-:~O,.___ _ .J o i 3 i~1--1='--"'o:,___ ___ __s.~._. ~ a,:__ __o-= -"1""".1:.:3: 1 11 o . . SHORTtHARjEY '. OZ 96 84 1 60 01/31/70 398~'95 67/31/70 ,--------- - - - . --- ~--------------=-c==-=--:-=.= =:---=-=-===:===~~~=:!==m=mllS!e!~~~~~!!!'!!!!!!'!!!!!!!'!!!!!!!!!!~!!!!~~~'!!!!!!-!!!l-l!!"""",_._ __________________________________________ _, - S A~ T A ARA GENERAL HOSPITAL - lNOlGE~T ACCOU,Jf f TEO FROM HAS T ~ MONTi ENDING 07/31/70- - - --- ~ - " _ , - fA T lENT -NAM.E ------- Mkf\JO -- PAYCOOE CS ) ST 8 lll lNG __ - SHRADER , JAC ~ OALE SHU~~AN , RE At-iEff - - ------- ' PAGE 11 ACCT . BALANCE DELETED - - -- __ I I .SOLIS, v1 SEN TA 01 so 12 2 , ST'APLEStANGElA. . 03 07 83 2 ---------- Sl'EPHEN SON,~JOHN--,P. OZ- 80:45 2 60 12/31/69 _________ .S_T_E_'lEJ-J_S_,.B._bS_t;._ ------------'0~ 1 77 49 2 S l'ONE, .T.H OMA.$. 02 83 03 2 60 01/31/70 ---~:-:-,-,----------- S ~JAR TLE"f , NA"tA.ll.e'. . 01. 46 SO 2 4/tO ll/30/69 ----------~flE~~~~tB_oqE=R;;;-r=-_, _____ .:.,_ __~ o!:.3:~0~s~124~z. _~ o~o!,_ ___.o 11~~-!-7-=o' ---------'a.!so 07/31/70 07/31/70 ! f l ' . : ' a .113_ 11.1 o=--------'r 1 l rAIT,'OAVlO 03' 03 48 z. 60 01/31/70 a.-so .07/3l/70 'TAYLOR;P'AULA '.J . .' ~t 74 Oi i 3/~o ll/JC/69 io:3Q 07131/.70 '.: . L : ----------!-rttoJ-1e_s_p~f'!. . B.A YMONP;. _w,= :- ---'---=-"i.;.;~ ___ .:0:~1, _9.!'!."z7~.9!.~1 __~ 6~0! .___ _:!:,_'. .: o l / 3J~/"1""'.0;;___ __~ .1~ ? ._9_9~.: 20 ___0 1131 119;-__ __ _1 ~ ; ro~AR,VlOLA 03 02 42 t 60 01 / 02/70 ss;1q .0 1 /31110 TORRE~-;-JUANA 01 63 77 2: 60 10/31/69 3-4725--~07/3f'/7o . ------~~---~RR~$~~~E=R~~~----------~00~7~4~3~2~2~-~60~ ___ 01/3l/70~-----39 .6 Q ~7/3.1/70~---~i TORREZ,GRACE 01 17 64 l 60 01/ 02/70 316.5Q TREVIN~_ ROBE-RT~S~.~---------~0~1 ~3~4~.-0~7--l~- ---6-0---~. 01/02/70 lil.30 _________ _ _ lR.P_u_e_~,.K.E.M!"te'--'r".;_;~'--'"w-'-;"- ________ .:9._2 li.i s4 i oo _1 qa~L60.:9:__ ____i ~9 . 1d TUGE.NO,ROSER"l' 'I(.; 03 ot 4.7 .z 60 01131/70 21 . i.o 07/31/70 97/31/70 l o.1l3_l l.1~0 ~--- 01131110 JI I ' I ,., ., I - ~ - , - - - - S AR SAR A 1 NOI GENJ: ACC OE LET ED FROM I~ T ERF IL E PAGE 12 _,, I \ ----- GENERAL HOSP ITAL . PATCENT NAME TURN l~GBEAR, FR EO UNZUE TA,CONCEPC ION ~ R . . - -------- V.A L. E~ T lNE ,E_VE.L.YN .L~---- I . ' \ VAN ZANT, Wl ll[AM J. \tAOSWOR rH,GLEN . ----WAR"FORO,soa -j. l.JES T ,R-ICHARo i:f. WH ITNE v,oIANA VAN ~VCK MONTH ENOlNG 07/31/70 MRNO PAYCUOE( .--- 02 45 71 1 ~ qf 60 -- - 02 92 55 2 ______ o~ _ Q~ 13 2 __ 60 02 31 42 l ' LAST 81LLING ACCT.BALANCE - OElETEO ll/30/69 / 1 t 21 7. 2 5 0 7 / 3 l / 70 --- 01/ 3 1/70 24. 80 12/~l/69 ___ ~ . . ------------'~~O ~ S SN.EB~t:HE~_R_i_ ~J_O.J:ULll.X _____~ 03J)7 5 7 2_ _ --=60_ _. .__. -------~d l /3 l/ 70 , ~9-~ 5_0 _ _ __ 0]01 /_JO ./ , WOLF ING TON, JUD 11'H 03 07 6 1 2 -,-------------- wooo, MAR\i .A 0.3 Ol 8 1 2 -------'--~~Y~~r{t._cft_BP~~-~~-~---~---'2~1~~2 4~ 1 Y O~N G.,JACK W~1 03 02 53 2 ' NO . lN"D"iGENT ACCOUNTS oe LE TEO THI s MONTH 60 60 60 bO 293 I '{) l/ 3 l/70 20.-00 07131/70 '-------,.01131/ 70 "149. 70 . 07 /3 l l70 ----~ ~O~l~/~3~1~/~7~0----~3:68.S~5~- ~~~07~J l~7_0----t , . 01/31/10 ,- ' ' f 6 s. 90 ~ 1 :". - ' . 11 319 '04 .,__ ______ _ _,_; ---:-: -, l-~-I j , Do----:JUrer. 111 t 3 i c; O 4 -: . 4f I Io J I O I . O tf -. " . _, ' , . ~ ~ - ~_ } --; l ---~~-~-~-~----------------------:----_, __, ________ -+/-~~------~---,~-11 ~ I ./ . . . . - ;:. . , . . . ' . : . ' ---- - -------- 89 gm Tr act 10, 699 Unit landscaping bond $1, 0P0. 00 and $2160. Tree Maintenance set ting amount I " Tract 10, 699 r eleasing $1290. t re.e planting bond I Pur chasing Agent r epor t of Public Auction at Co Rd Yar d September 12 1970 I I Physical ~.vaiver (' September 28, 1970 In the Matter of Recommendation of Landscape Architect for Placement of Bond in the Amount of $1,080.00 to assure planting of trees and deposit of $2,160.00 cash for street tree maintenance, Generally Located Nort~ of Stow Canyon Road and West of Fairview Avenue in the Third Supervisorial District. (Tract #10,699, Unit 3) . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the recommendation of the County Land- - scape Architect to require the placement of a bond, in the amount of $1,080.00, to assure planting of trees and deposit of $2,160.00 cash for street tree maintenance be, and the same is hereby, confirmed . In the Matter of Recommendation of County Landscape Architect for Release of Street Tree Planting Bond for Tract #10,699, in the Amount of $1,290.00. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the street tree planting bond for Tract #10,699 be, and the same is hereby, released as to all future acts and conditions, as follows, as recommended by the County Landscape Architect: Al Barker Insurance Company, as Surety - Goleta Valley Development Co. as Principal, for Bond No . 83-M-159-364, dated October 4, 1968. In the Matter of Report of Public Auction held at the County Road Yard on September 12, 1970. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the above-entitled matter be placed on file. In the Matter of Request of Chief Probation Officer For Approval of Acceptance of $25 .00 Donation. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the request of the Chief Probation Officer for approval of acceptance of $25 .00 donation from Santa Barbara Uptown Lions be, and the same is hereby, approved for deposit to the Probation Officer's Trust Fund. In the Matter of Approving Request for Waiver of Physical Requirements for Prospective Employees, Santa Barbara General Hospital . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan , and carried unanimously, it is ordered that t he request for a waiver of the physical requirements for the following prospective employees be, and the same are hereby approved, as recommended by Dr. David Caldwell: rJoan Pollock - Senior Stenographer Clerk / Sandra L. Johnston - Maid App tment Election In the Matter of Appointment of Election Officer and Designation of Officer and Desi~n - ation of Polling Polling Places for General Election to be Held November 3, 1970 . Places Gen ' l Elect n November 3, 1970 Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Cal lahan I 90 ' September 28 , 1970 and carried unanim~usly, the following Order was passed and adopted; publication to be in the Sant a Barbara News-Fress: ORDER (LIST) See Li st in back pocket of Book No . 138 . ' .~ . " , Lakeside Mobile Home Park (Fess Par ker, Jr . ) 100~ Consent to Co Service Area No . 3 Claims County I Against I Reports and Communications I - - September 28 , 1970 In the Matter of Request of Authorization from Fess E. Parker, Jr., Lakeside Mobile Home Park for LAFCO to proceed without notice and hearing on 100% Consent to annexation of Assessor's Parcel 71-190-27 to County Service Area No. 3 as required for Conditional Use Permit 69-CP-53. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the above-entitled matter be approved and referred to LAFCO. In the Matter of Claims Against the County Filed by Individuals and/or Attorneys on Behalf of Clients for Alleged Damages. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the following claims against the County f i led by individuals and/or attorneys on behalf of clients for alleged damages be, . and the same are hereby, referred to the County Counsel and insurance carrier. ; John M. Sink for Richard Lee Stempson, $50,000.00, for personal injury. / John M. Sink for Daailo Guzman, $50,000.00, personal inju~y. 1 James T. Lindsey for Hildegard G. Lagerquist, $4,500.00, general damages ; Joel K. Kapiloff, $5,081.50, General Damages. 1 Kenneth William Murray, $381.50, general damages. In the Matter of Reports and Communications . The following Reports and Communications were received by the Board and ordered placed on file: /l) County Treasurer - Investment of Temporary Surplus Moneys, August, 1970. /4) Auditor-Controller - Audit of Parks Department, January 1, 1969, through-December 31, 1969. Health Department - ''Jail Standards Evaluation Form'' for inspection of Lompoc City Jail and Guadalupe City. City of Santa Barbara - Resolution 7219 fixing September 29, 1970, at 2 p . m. ,- for Public Hearing on consideration of establishment of Underground Utility District No. 1. / 5) Resolutions requesting review of assessing practices of State Board of Equalization Re State Assessed property from Yuba and Madera County Boards of Super- / 6) -8) vi sors. PUC extension of time to October 30, 1970, for investigation on Commission's own motion into adoption of general order prohibiting pollution of railroad rights-of-way by railroad corporations. Amended Application of Air West before PUC for Authority to increase intrastate passenger fares. California State Advisory Board to Bureau of Land Management - Resolution urging continued. study of ''Operation ORVAC. '' ~9) State Board of Equalization - Statement of Local Tax Distribution, Retail Sales, September 11, 1970 - $111,439.12. Rlanning r eports 0,ommiss on In the Matter of Planning Commission Reports for Information Only. The following reports were received for information only and ordered / placed on file: 91 92 Agricultural Preserves lqezone and Creation I Salaries Salaries I Leave of Absence Salaries I I ( September 28 , 1970 / 1) Granted Conditional Use Permit on request of Goleta Baptist *Ch urch (70-CP-51) to permit construction and use of church church related activities at 6017 Stow Canyon Road, Goleta. / 2) Granted Conditional Use Aermit on request of LCR Company (70-CP-52) to allow establishment and use of commercial parking lot at 6509 El Colegio Road, Isla Vista. ,-5) Dropped from agenda the referral from Board of Supervisors of proposed amendment (70-0A-14) (70-M-67) to Ordinance No. 661 modifying the definition of Automobile Service Station to permit rental of trucks and trailers. Continued public hearing to October 7, 1970 meeting on referral from Board of Supervisors of proposed amendment (70-0A-15) (70-M-67) to Ordinance 661 to allow trailer and truck rental in certain comnercial Districts subject to Conditional Use Permit. Determined on request of Road Commissioner that proposed abandonment of portion of Mission Drive, lying east of Alamo Pintado Road is not in conflict with General Plan (70-R-10). Denied request of P. A. Anderson (70-V-44) for Conditional Exception to allow an 8 unit, two-story legal non-conforming apartment house to remain on proposed parcel with an 31,963 instead of 160,000 sq. foot area, and an adjustment to allow 13.5 foot instead of 15 foot side yard setback at 1185 Anderson Lane, Goleta. / 7) Denied request of William Dayka (70-RZ-70) for initiation of an ordinance amending Ordinance 661 rezoning from 20-R-1-0 to A-1-X-O on property on north side of Serena Ave 750 feet easterly from Toro Canyon Road, Carpinteria. In the Matter of Request of Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee - for Consideration of Proposed Deadline of November 30, 1970, for Filing and Receiving of Applications for Agricultural Preserves for Tax Lien Year beginning March 1, 1971. A discussion ensued with Supervisor Beattie advising that he could see no purpose in having a closing date this year. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the above-entitled request be, and the same is hereby, continued to Monday, October 5, 1970, for further discussion. - In the Matter of Fixing Compensation for Monthly Salaried Positions . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO. 70-600 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Fixing Compensation for Monthly Salaried Positions. (Laguna County Sanitation District). Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO. 70-601 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT Fll.E) In the Matter of Request of Distric~ Attorney for Four Months' Leave of Absence Without Pay for Employee from December 1, 1970 through March 31, 1971. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the reques t of the District Attorney for a four months' leave of absence without pay for Yolanda Huffman, Legal Stenographer I Clerk, from December 1, 1970, through March 31, 1971, be, and the same is hereby, approved. I and Fixin~ Clerk ) . In the Matte r of Allowance of Positions , Disallowance of Positions, of Compensati on for Monthly Salaries Positions (Sheriff & Coroner- Int ermediate carried . Upon Moti on of S u~e rvi sor Beattie , seconded by unanimously, the followin~ resolution was passed and RESOLU~ION No . 70- 601A Supervisor Grant , and adopted : - Sher iff ' s Dept . Salaries I Travel 1equests / Overtime Polic I Drug Problem I Waller Park Majestic Tract Annex Co Servic Area #5 providi Street Li~hting I Grant Deed Ko - ~rt Homes , Inc . Tract 10, 660 open space I September 28, 1970 In the Matter of Reconnnendation of Administrative Officer for Addition of One (1) Position of Intermediate Clerk, Range 41 , in Sheriff-Coroner Department. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the recoII1I1endation of the Administrative Officer for the addition of one (1) position of Intermediate Clerk, Range 41, in the Sheriff-Coroner Department be, and the same is hereby, confirmed. In the Matter of Request of Administrative Officer for Approval of Two (2) Travel Requests for Judge Royce R. Lewellen, Solvang Judicial District, to attend California Justices, Marshals and Constables Association's Annuel Convention in Fresno, Calif., October 14-16, 1970, and Institute for Municipal and Justice Court Judges in San Diego, Calif., Oct. 30, 31, 1970. Wpon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the above-entitled request of the Administrative Officer for approval of two (2) travel requests for Judge Royce R. Lewellen, Solvang Judicial District, be, and the same is hereby, approved. In the Matter of Proposed Amendment to overtime Policy. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, removed from the agenda upon request of Administrative Officer. In the Matter of Progress Report by Lorenzo DalliArmi, County Superintendent of Schools, on Drug Problem in Conmunity. - Mr. Dall'Armi phoned the Administrative Officer that due to the death of his mother, he would like above-entitled report continued for one week. Upon motion of Supervisor Callahan, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the above-entitled report be, and the same is hereby, continued to Monday, October 5, 1970. In the Matter of Proposed Resolution of Application for Annexation of Waller Park Majestic Tract and Adjacent Areas to County Service Area No. 5 for the g Purpose of Providing Street Lighting. The recommendation of the Administrative OFFICER, DATED September 22, 1970, was read by the Clerk. Supervisor Tunnell questioned whether a l l the people involved are agreeable to proposed application. He would like to have further inquiry made into the matter. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell , seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the above-entitled matter be, and the same is hereby, continued to Monday, October 5, 1970. In the Matter of Acceptance of Grant Deed from Ko-Art Homes, Inc., to the County for Lot 56 of Tract #10,660 for Open Space, Third Supervisorial District. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that a Grant Deed, dated June 18 , 1970, from Ko-Art Homes, for Lot 56 of Tract #10,660 for open space , Third Supervisorial District, be, and the same is hereby , accepted by the County; and the Clerk be, and he is hereby , 93 94 September 28, 1970 aut9orized and directed to record said Grant Deed in the office of the Santa Barbara County Recorder. Advance Trav 1 In the Matter of Increasing the Amount of the Advance Travel Revolving Revolving F d I Fund. State Funds for Park Development I Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and . carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO . 70-602 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Requesting State Funds for Park Development . - Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO. 70-603 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) Surplus Pro- In the Matter of Request of Real Property Division, Department of perty declar d by Real Pro- Public Works, for Declaration of Certain Parcel of Land in Vicinity of Corta Street, perty Divisi n I 30 Feet East of Fairview Avenue, Goleta, Third Supervisorial District, as Surplus Clarence H. Schutte Res Commendation I Admin Office Appt Commt S B Co Air Pollution Control Dist j Property. The above-entitled request dated September 24, 1970, from the Right of Way Agent was received by the Board and read by the Clerk. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the above-entitled request be, and the same is hereby, referred to the Road Dept ., Planning Dept., and Flood Control Dept. for report back to the Board, and the Real Property Division, Department of Public Works be, and they are hereby, requested to notify appropriate public agencies of the proposed disposition of subject surplus property. It is further ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, continued to Tuesday, October 13, 1970 In the Matter of Commendation of Clarence H. Schutte. Upon motion of Supervisor Callahan, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO. 70-604 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Recommendation of Administrative Officer for Appointment of Committee for Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District. (Cont'd). A recommendation from the Administrative Officer, dated September 28, 1970, that the Board after reaching agreement on the composition of subject committee either select the names of the individuals to represent a particular office or ask that office or agency to submit the name of their nominee. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the following list of offices and organizations, as recommended by the Administrative Officer, be, and the same are hereby, appointed as members of the Committee for the Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District, with the exception of the County Counsel's office, which should be Communications I September 28, 1970 removed as a member but remain as an advisory member, and with the addition of the League of Women Voters and the Tuberculosis and Health Association, with the under- . standing that each of the County Departments and other organizations nominate a representative within two weeks: Administrative Office Fire Department Farm Bureau Health Department Range Improvement Association Each City Santa Barbara County Taxpayers Association Public Works Agricultural Commissioner Farm ~ Home Advisor County Medical Society League of Women Voters Tuberculosis and Health Association It is further ordered that the Carpinteria Fire District, Montecito Fire District and the Mission Canyon Fire District consolidate to appoint one person from the three Districts to represent the Fire Districts . In the Matter of Communications. The following communications were received by the Board, read by the Clerk and ordered placed on file: ' I Mrs. Gilbert O'Reilly - Endorsement of Report on Civil Disorders ; Carpinteria City Council - Invitation to Observance of the 5th Anniversary of City of Carpinteria, Sept. 28, 1970, at 7:30 p. m Loraine Ear ly ltr In the Matter of Commendation from Loraine B. Early for Wally Dawson, of Commen1ation to ~ally Dawson Vete n Veteran's Service Officer in Santa Maria. Service Officer S I The above-entitled commendation dated September 16, 1970,vas received Citizens Gomms report on Civi Disorders / Rental Retardatio Boar d Resignation Rene Beauchesne & Apptmant of Mrs . William Mosby / Ventura Co Harb r mas ter review and recom on proposed Cojo Anc~orage / by the Board, read by the Clerk and ordered placed on file, and copies transmitted to the Personnel Office and the Veteran's Service Officer. In the Matter of Report of Citizens Commission on Civil Disorders. The above-entitled report dated September 15, 1970, was received by the Board and ordered placed on file and copies transmitted to the Administrative Officer, County Counsel, Public Defender and District Attorney. In the Matter of Acceptance of Resignation of Mr. Rene Beauchesne, Lompoc Area Representative on Regional Area Planning Board of Mental Retardation and Appointment of Mrs. William Mosby, 513 North Daisy Street, Lompoc, Calif. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimous ly, it is ordered that the resignation of Mr. Rene Beauchesne, Lompoc Area Representative on Regional Area Planning Board of Mental Retardation, effective September 8, 1970, be and the same is hereby accepted, and the appointment of Mrs. William Mosby, 513 North Daisy Street, Lompoc, Calif. 93436, be, and the same is hereby, approved. In the Matter of Request of Ron McClellan, Ventura County Harbormaster, Channel Island Harbor, for Review and recommendation relative to Proposed Cojo Anchorage. The above-entitled request dated September 16, 1970, was received by the Board and read by the Clerk. 95 96 Co Clerk req certain meas r be omitted from Gen 11 September 28, 1970 Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the proposal for the proposed Cojo Amchorage designated as a harbor of refuge in the California Boating Plan adopted by the Legislature in 1964 be, and the same is hereby, endors~d by the Board, and the Boards of Supervisors of the Counties of Ventura and San Luis Obispo be, and the same ar~ hereby, notified, urging their favorable support of same. In the Matter of Request of County Clerk for Authorization for Certain Local Measures to be Omitted from General Election Ballot and Printed on Separate Election Bal otBallot per Elections Code, Section 10232. and print separate bal ot for 2 school Districts I Exec of Indemnif ica tio Agreem' t btw S B Mental Health As soc & Co Mental Health Servi e I Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the request of the County Clerk for authorization for certain local measures to be omitted from the General Election Ballot and printed on separate ballot per Elections Code, Section 10232 be, and the same is hereby, approved. In the Matter of Execution of Indemnification Agreement between Santa . - Barbara Mental Health Association and the County through Mental Health Service for Use of Real Property of Association for Therapeutic Treatment of Mentally Ill Persons. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUIION NO. 70-605 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) Howar dP . i n the Matter- of Execution of Contract between the County and Howard Friedman, M. Psychiatrist P. Friedman, MD., Psychiatrist, Mental Health Services~ for Professional Services. , Governor Reagan ' s Proclamation relating to Nov 3, 1970 election Co clerk oost I Upon motion of Sup~rvisor Callahan, seconded by Supervisor. Grant, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLt.rrION NO. 70-606 . (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) , In the Matter of Request of County Clerk for Authorization to Post Copy of Governor Reagan's Proclamation relating to November General Election on Courthouse Bulletin Board pursuant to Section 2603 of Election Code. . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the request of the County Clerk for authorization to post a copy of Governor Reagan's Proclamation relating to November General Election on Courthouse Bulletin Board pursuant to Section 2603 of Election Code be, and the s111De is hereby, approved. The Board recessed until 2 o'clock p. m. At 2 o'clock, p. m., the Board reconvened. Present: Supervisors George H. Clyde, Joe J. Callahan, Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell; and J. E. Lewis, Clerk. Supervisor Clyde in the Chair. I Allowance of Clai I 97 September 28, 1970 In the Matter of Allowance of Claims. Upon motion, duly seconded, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the following claims be, and the same are hereby allowed, each claim for the amount and payable out of the fund designated on the face of each claim, respectively, to-wit: (CLAIMS LIST) , - - NUMBER -. ,. 1971 1171 ,. ,. - i , . -, - . . , .,. - ''" UIO 1101 ln uu UM . UM 1117 AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER PAYEE ., . ,_ - la . .,, . ., . .,_.N _ . , aw . "" . u al .i .ril. ., . - .i i.e .-.t.n.l. . . . .u. I . . . _ J-. lllieftaLMd.M lliri'l.al&a :1 . . h1lf ~-'*- etJlf O. - 111~ . SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PURPOSE SYMBOL l 11 1ato J , la M ,. ~- 1a11 JI .-i . D a 11 . uan 19 . , 118 11 iI~ . - . '**' . uau n -.,. . lY a M n u llH ~ .,. ftUlli WARRANT ALLOWED FOR 10.11 6J.J1 . 1.n 1 . n.11 JA.IO , . n.a. 11.H 11.71 i,au.11 M.to 11.ot Jl.M U.IO ,_, us . . u . 1.71 '1.to . 111 . 11 ., 10.1 u.n ni.n . 11.00 711.00 , . """' i ,. ' J ' REMARKS NUMBER Utt Ult 111& l&ll 1111 lilt 11&1 UM 8U7 llU 1111 . . 1111 llM u.u 1111 1117 . ellt 1111 1111 1111 llh , ., UJI IUI U.17 tltl IMI IMI II.ti Gt IMI 11 . '."' AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANT A BARBARA COUNTY FUND,----====------~DATE PAYEE C:lit . . ._et. .al - U.A.~ - Mi.t - .~ - ~ . - Ce - PURPOSE SYMBOL . ~ ., -.- ~ . ,. . . llilabl ., . ,. . -~ . a N8U JA MCI n J , 71. JA 71. JI ,. uo ,. a a n2 . IO a J 11 ., - llMlil-. l 111 J 1U a I a me WARRANT ALLOWED FOR ,s , . ' m.n 1 u.17 u 1.11t.aa H.17 u . M.M . 11.H 11.41 It' U.H u.u 111.47 lit.II . . 118 . . . , 1.111.u , Jn'J . J c REMARKS . . . ". u ,_, . ,. n "" . . NUMBER .,, '* na ' 8110 1111 tin eau & n 1117 111 . DtJ. all tt1A UM . . , . an ,. u.n aJ.M ,. .,.,. ,. IJli Uh . . ' AUDITOR'S. WARRANT REGISTER SANT A BARBARA COUNTY ~ FUND t!ll9N-.t _____ -L.DATE PAYEE PURPOSE SYMBOL ~ 1aau .,. . .i . , -i _ _. I.OS a I ' , . u tiii9IAt , " -u.uu. II a II . ~SM. , - .107 I .c. 117. ll , "*'* Ille. . . ca1u . a. Ue I 11111 -i UI I J.a ftlll .u. . lJO a U I a . aallf . tlil . utan .,, . . UlU 8lilllljl a . lit II -.a-. s.e -i, u.aa -- . Ill n ,. . lit 11 .NIAia . l L ~CldM-.w , 1.4.a.l . ; - . . . WARRANT ALLOWED FOR . ,. ~ a. . , . ua.u . ltl.U ''.'.". . a. . . I.ti 11.n . . . 1'~ ? ,.u n.u a.u 1 . w.a 1, au. U.M 11.11 JS.M an. . I w , , ' ~- REt1ARKS . . . . l . I . " AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER . . ' SANT A BARBARA COUNTY DATE NUMBER I . - 1117 . llM llM 1 nu 8UI . ., 1111 n . - 1111 FUND.-at PAYEE PURPOSE , . . .- .i . Udili . . . - . . -a . _,. . ll Cllilf - ~ . tlUliils - .0. . u . ~11 , . 11 u- -- . ~ . ._. tfUMlm ou . - -.iu. Oli"W 1fiiu. ' 011.WS tfiUllil 111. . - .,., . , . . ' . : SYMBOL I.II a ' lst n Wal UlU . 111., - us 11 - . . . ,. WARRANT ALLOWED FOR . u.u -. U9 u u.to ,. . , . u ., . . . 11 11 IS.IO 11.u . . lf.00 . . . . . . , . w . II.YI . ,. U,IO . . ' ) REMARKS 111 JA 117 a n u.11 NUMBER an - 1111 ,., . UH 9111 an . IM1 atl . an 1111 nu ua au USS . , . .r. . ~ - ' , l I AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANT A BARBARA COUNTY FUND--=---.==='------_,DATE. PAYEE PURPOSE i.e.~ . l'lliiilis. aa . lti. .-ia . "1lil.r. ~ ,. . a.nee . llOCdU._C19 . , 11 . .i.u.-. . . . , e. . . C. , . a-. lilial . . .-w -euau.a. . . . ' . . a. . . . . . . -.UL_ ,_ . ~--- . ~ -~ . l'W . ------------ - SYMBOL Ill a 11 lQ JI 111 au nm 157 11 lHt 119. 11 lit . lBaU 111 a a 111 a It lit. Q. 171. ,. ln. ,. . - . ,. WARRANT ALLOWED FOR n.oo n.11 . a.oo l, . ta.u 1.11 a.u uo.oo UI . 11.JO u.u D.M Ut.U 11.M "' 1.11. . w . u. ,. . , 1.8'. J.,4"'.IO lU.00 , . . . . . "' ' REMARKS n.M csn . . NUMBER , - . ,. .,. r . I '\ if 4 I AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER . SANTA BARBARA COUNTY, FUND---.--~;.;, ;_"'.--' ------------L-DATE PAYEE l .' ' .' I .t.a.on. . . . . C. .C. . PURPOSE .' . . , . . . . , . SYMBOL i.ncs . 10 aaa I at a I , an es llt. Pl a J ,., ua1 D al Pal . , * ". J . ., Utat was Illa t ".". * ' &II I 174 . "" WARRANT ALLOWED FOR ,. ., . m.te ., . u 10 . ' . u u.u (Ja. 119.71 1.11 . ,.H .(9',.M) ,_ ,' .' l.441 .'.''.' .,. .-. D.1 . . UJI su.te a.10 . JS.40 .au REMARKS ' I 1' 1 ' ' ' ,. NUMBER . ., uu . . . . . I I . . . . " / I I . AUDITOR'S WARRANT R. EGISTER I I ' SANT A BARBARA COUNTY . l ' ' ' ' lt'lf. FUND~--'--'-~~--'---'---'-~~~ DATE.~~~~~~- PA Y EE .,. . ~ ._,OU.Oi lt.- .,. &1.eft , PURPOSE . . . ,.=.=., ., ~ ~ T.J!, ( . . ' SYMBOL IAtS I MO . , . ,. , JAi a II . W ARRANT ALLOWED FOR . u . . , , . . ., . , 1 .-. DL s 111.111 . b 171.n . ., WI.It ltLlf ' . REMARKS -- . . I . . . . I~ :I NUMBER . - . . 1111 , I I j ' . ' ' I f 'AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER . SANT A BARBARA COUNTY \ f. M ' PAYEE PURPOSE *lW til.U llila &1 a . . a SYMBOL Jlt S * I' ., Ill 9 lltb WARRANT ALLOWED FOR , . - . it. JA.H 111.n. IJt.U . 1.so ' I REMARKS ~- =L . . I AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANT A BARBARA COUNTY FUND ! . , I -----~DATE ii.,~ . 1'70 4 . . . ' . . . ' NUMBER PAYEE - 111.ram .i ' ' . . . . , AifDitOR'S WARRANT REGISTER ' I ~ SANT A BARBARA COUNTY l ' ;1',., . : PURPOSE SYMBOL \ Nll.4CI WARRANT ALLOWED FOR . .,. 11, , . . . -in.a 1 S . , ( ' REMARKS ' \ 98 to-wi t: September 28 , 1970 Upon the roll being called, the following Supervisors voted Aye, George H. Clyde, Joe J. Callahan, Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell. Hoes; Bone ABSENT: None An ropriatio In the Matter of Request for Appropriation, Cancellation or Revision Ca lC'ell.tion or ~ - -.,_~'( _ - ~ of Funds. Re 1isi on I A17,cicul tural Pr3serves Rezone & Cr3ation I A 5r icultural P?eser ves R3zone & Cceation I / Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the following request for appropriation, cancellation or revision of funds is hereby approved, in the budget classification and amount shown, and the Auditor be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to make the necessary transfers: Superior Court, Transfer from Acct. 75-Bl4, Office Expense, $240.00 to Account 75-B-22, Transportation, General Fund. Sheriff-Coroner, Transfer from Acct. 90-A-l, Regular Salaries, $25,000.00 to Acct. 90-A-4, Extra Help and/or Labor, General Fund. In the Matter of Hearings on Planning Commission and Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee Recommendations for Approval of Requests for Rezoning and Creation of Agricultural Preserves. This being the date and time set for hearings on subject proposal; the Affidavits of Publication being on file with the Clerk; and there being no appearances or written statements submitted for or against subject proposals; and the County Counsel having reported that signatures of the contracting parties were still needed in the contracts; Upon motion of Supervisor Callahan, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the hearings on tbe following applications be continued to 2 o'clock, p. m., October 26, 1970: / Maria Antonia Careaga Ranch (70-AP-3) (70-RZ-6) / Ramon F. Careaga Ranch (70-AP-4} (70-RZ-7) and that the hearing on the following application be continued to 2 o'clock p.m., October 5, 1970: 1D. A. Silva (70-AP-34) (70-RZ-61) In the Matter of Hearings on Planning Commission and Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee Recoamendations for Approval of Requests for Rezoning of Proposed Agricultural Preserve Lands. This being the date and time set for hearings on subject proposal; the Affidavits of Publication being on file with the Clerk; and there being no appearances or written statements submitted for or against subject proposals: Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the recommendations of the Planning . Commission and Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee to adopt ordinances amending Article IV of Ordinance No. 661, as amended, for a Agricultural Preserves, on the I basis that they conform to the General Plan of the County be, and the same are hereby confirmed, for the following: / 1) Manfrina, et al (70-RZ-19) rezone from RA-0 to 40-AL-O Aiz r ic ul tural Preser ves Rezoning Agricultural Preserves Creation of; A~ricultural ?reserves Creation Agricultural Preser ves I I Land Contr acts I I ordinance: September 28 , 1970 ~ 2) Weldon, et al. (70-RZ-41) rezone from 10-AG-to 40-AG / 3) Adam ~ Acquistapace {70-RZ-42) rezone from U to 40-AG ~4) Acquistapace ~ Adam (70-RZ-43) rezone from U to 40-AG ,5) Ferini Ranch (70-RZ-46) rezone from U to 40-AG / 6) Grisingher, et al (70-Rz-47) rezone from U to 40-AG 1 7) Pasquini (70-RZ~51) rezone from U to 40-AG / 8) Guggia, et al. (70-RZ-54) rezone from 10-AG to 40-AG /9) Manni - Corbellini (70-RZ-60) rezone from U to 40-AG It is further ordered that the Board passed and adopted the following In the Matter of Ordinance No. 2121 - An Ordinance of The County of Santa Barbara, as Amended, by adding Section 652 to Article IV of Said Ordinance. 99 Upon the roll being called, the following Supervisors voted Aye, to-wit: George H. Clyde, Joe J. Callahan, Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell. NOES: None ABSENT: None . In the Matter of Hearings on Planning Commission and Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee Recommendations for Creation of Agricultural Preserves, Lompoc, Guadalupe and Santa Maria Areas. This being the date and time set for hearings on subject proposals; the Affidavits of Publication being on file with the Clerk; and there being no appearances or written statements submitted for or against subject proposal. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the recommendations of the Planning Commission and Agricultural Preserve Advisory Conmittee toJ.:prove the following application to create agricultural preserves, under the provisions of Chapter 1443, Statutes of 1965, known as the California Land Conservation Act be, and the same are hereby, confirmed, from a land use standpoint, on the basis that they conform to the criteria established by the Board of Supervisors of Santa Barbara County: adopted: / 1) Manfrina, et al . / 2) Weldon, et al /.3) Adam ~ Acquistapace: , 4) Acquistapace ~Adam / 5) Ferini Ranch /6) Grisingher, et al /7) Pasquini /8) Guggia, et al / 9) Manni - Corbellini "'(70-AP- 7) -- (70-AP-15) / (70-AP-16) "(70-AP-11) / (70-AP-20) .-(70-AP-21) (70-AP-25) (70-AP-28) (70-AP-33) It is further ordered that the following resolution be passed and In the Matter of Creation of Agricultural Preserves in the Lompoc, Guadalupe, and Santa Maria Areas, Fourth and Fifth Supervisorial Districts. RESOLUTION NO. 70-607 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Execution of Land Conservation Contracts for Approved Agricultural Preserves, between the County of Santa Barbara and Certain Property OWners. , ~00 Appeal of Dr Eugene Aiche / September 28, 1970 Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell , seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the following resolutions were passed and adopted, authorizing the Chairman and Clerk to execute subject contracts for agricultural preserves between the County of Santa Barbara and the following named property owners: / Resolution No. 70-608 - Manfrina, et al. / Resolution No. 70-609 - Weldon, et al 1 Resolution No. 70- 610 - Adam & Acquistapace / Resolution No. 70-611 - Acquistapace & Adam .!Resolution No. 70-612 - Ferini Ranch ~ Resolution No. 70-613 - Grisingher, et al Resolution No. ZP-614 - Pasquini Resolution No. 70-615 - Guggia, et al Resolution No. 70- 616 - Manni - Corbellini (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) (70-AP-7) (70-AP-15) (70-AP-16) (70-AP-17) (70-AP-20) (70-AP-21) (70-AP-25) (70-AP-28) (70-AP-33) In the Matter of Hearing on Appeal of Dr. Eugene & Aiches from Conditions Imposed on Planning Commission Approval of Development Plan (70-M-88) for Office Building, Goleta. This being the date and time set for hearing on subject proposal; the Affidavit of Publication being on file with the Clerk; Supervisor Grant reported that applicant's attorney had requested a one week's continuance. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject hearing be and the same is hereby, continued to 2 o'clock, p . m., October 5, 1970 . Appeal of In the Matter of Continued Hearing on the Appeal of James N. Forman James N. For an ; from Planning Connnission Denial of Request (70-V-43) for Conditional Exception to Appeal of Mrs . Pedotti on Macco aorporation permit I Allow Creation of 17,000 sq. ft. parcel Instead of Required 5 Acres at 690 N. Fairview Avenue, Goleta. This hearing having been continued from September 21, 1970, Supervisor Grant announced that he had discussed the matter with Mr. and Mrs. Forman and had suggested that perhaps 6 acres of the parcel should be rezoned to a residential use ' Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that this matter be referred back to the Planning Connnission with a request that it hold hearings on rezoning the entire property to 8-R-l or the 10-R-l district classification, that any fees be waived and that this hearing be and the same is hereby continued to Monday, November 30, 1970, at 2 o'clock, p. m. In the Matter of Continued Hearings on a) Appeal of Mrs . Adolf C. Pedotti from Planning Connnission decision to grant request of Macco Corporation (Rancho Santa Barbara ) (70-CP-33) for issuance of Conditional Use Permit on portions of Hollister Ranch located westerly of Gaviota; b) Appeal of Macco Corporation (Rancho Santa Barbara) of Condition No. 45 of said Conditional Use Permit; and c) Planni ng Connnission recommendation from request of Macco Corporation (Rancho Santa Barbara) (70-RZ-34) to adopt ordinance amending Article IV of Ordinance 661 t o rezone cer tain portions from 100-AL-0 to 100-AL-0-PC Planned Commercial & BD-Beach Development Districts. This being the date and time set for the continued heari ngs on subject appeals ; Supervisors Clyde and Tunnell reported that they had l i s t ened to the recordings and read the minutes and conmunications of the September 21, 1970 hearings September 28, 1970 on subject matters. The Clerk read a communication from the Citizens Planning Association urging a moratorium on coastal development in Santa Barbara County until State Legislation can be applied. Attorney George H. Allen, for t he developer, delineated the proposed occupamcy time limit controls and plans for the cabinas and camp sites. This is a ''destination camp site''. Sizeable turnover in use of the campsites is essential to the economic projection of applicant . Gross revenue will derive from admissions and commercial facilities. Some of the campsites will be leased for as long as one year. Mr. Clyde asserted his concern that there is nothing in the ''conditions'' 101 that limited leases or rentals to one year. Attorney Allen pointed out a recollection ' that State ~ County subdivision regulations might apply. He commented on economic considerations of the proposed development and the conclusion that they precluded permanent occupancy . In response to questions from Chairman Clyde, Mr. Allen and Mr. William Woolett, Jr., Vice President and General Manager of ''The Gaviota Coast'' explained proposed use and limitation in occupancy of the ''Cabinas ''. In response to Mr. Clydes' inquiry regarding enforceability of school r'e gistration restrictions, Attorney Allen thought it is enforceable as to the campsite. Planning Director H. H. Divelbias displayed and explained exhibits from the Planning Commission hearing which oriented the 2400 acres to the overall 14,000 acres of Hollister Ranch and Gaviota Pass State Park Area, the entrance road and road development within the proposed recreational area, grading plan and road alignment. Several state agencies are concerned with these matters of road development - State Division of Beaches and Parks and State Division of Highways . Attorney Allen clarified access rights of developer over the Gaviota State Park area and preliminary discussions with the State concerning this. The whole question of access must come before the Planning Commission at a future date . Mr. Clyde referred to difficulty of policing of occupancy limits and how State Parks cope with this. Mr. Allen expressed hope they could do likewise, depending on experience from actual use, and will come up with a specific program. Miss Virginia Burrell appeared, submitted a written statement quoting Mr . John Hirten, questioned several unanswered problems - water, sewage, etc., needs. She feared increase in smog to be generated by the development. She is opposed to the development. Phillip Marking, Los Padres Chapter, Sierra Club appeared and questioned school attendance restriction. He thinks it illegal and unenforceable, quoting Education Code provisions requiring school attendance. Occupants of ''Cabinas'' will have right to send their children to schools and the county must provide school facilities . Mr. Paul Relis, appeared and expressed concern over time limits on occupancy of units, advocated 3 month limit, use of motorcycles may destroy park-like quality of area - their use should be eliminated. Mrs. James Higman, appeared as a citizen for the General Plan and exSeptember 28, 1970 pressed fear that inadequate control existed to quarantee limited occupancy of the development. There are a lot of questions to be answered before thi s goes ahead. Mr. Leslie Baird appeared and pointed out existence of oil seeps in the area which polluted the beach. Do prospective purchasers or renters in the area know of this? Mr. James Trynor, State Department of Parks and Recreation, appeared not necessarily in opposition but in concern with access plan of the development and its impact upon the quality of the Gaviota State Park experience. Present plan for interchange and access at Gaviota Store is not acceptable, because it preempts such a large portion of park land obtained with bond funds . Traffic across the park will greatly increase. Supervisor Beattie expressed belief that grade separations across the State Park must be provided in any event. Mr. Fred Eissler appeared, representing Scenic Shorelines and pursued the question of the right of way across Gaviota Beach Park, recounnending that this problem must be solved first as the present situation and proposed development was not in the picture at the time the right of way was granted by the State. Highway One may be an alternative outlet or inlet to the area proposed for development. Duration of stay - 7 to 10 days for travel trailers in sunnner and 30 days in winter is sugges~ ed. Cabinas are a disguised residential and a subterfuge therefore. Can ''Cabina'' users sublet premises - how can they be limited in occupancy? Entrance by foot and horseback should be required for the public. Referred to new law (AB-493) requiring public access to beach in subdivisions. Qualified offer of dedication would permit county to assert access option at some future time. Mr. Fred Eissler spoke of attempting to persuade legislators to have U. S. Government acquire the area for a National Park rather than let it remain subject to private development. Dr. Kalon Kelly of Los Padres Chapter, of Sierra Club, spoke of unpleasant difficulties of enforcing limited time of occupancy of recreational facilities . Occupants will not know what is required of them in terms of occupancy duration. Dr. Kelly called for workable and enforceable occupancy limitations . Garvin Kuskey, Citizens Couunittee for General Plan, requested definition of recreational vehicle and limits on size of same. Mr. Divelbiss clarified this, saying State regulations defined Mobile Home and Travel Trailers, could have 40' x 8 1 vehicle, excluding certain non-living space. Kuskey pointed out that thereby a Mobile Home type trailer could technically be used in the proposed facility. He wondered if State licensing regulations may be circUDl\Tented and thought this required more study . As to the proposal being within the County Flood Control District, he requested Mr. Stubchaer's views. Mr. Stubchaer stated the development is not in a Flood Zone. Experience is that demand for maintenance follows natural disasters and therefore reconmended annexation to Goleta Flood Zone. Attorney Allen, felt State regulations regarding recreational vehicles are very detailed as to difference from mobile home and therefore developer does not at this time have permit for a Mobile Home Park. The definition of recreational vehicle is incorporated in the conditions. The school restrictions were drafted by County Counsel . The conditional 103 September 28, 1970 use permit could be invalidated by someone attending school from these sites. John Mitchell, Deputy County Counsel, pointed out that no effort had been made to restrict enrollment in public schools. Regarding access from U. S. Highway 101, the plan is that of State Division of Highways not that of applicant. Therefore State Division of Beaches and Parks should discuss this matter and resolve it with Division of Highways. The General Plan repre~entative, should attempt to amend same, rather than attack this development. Supervisor Grant, speaking of duration of occupancy, felt there could be great misunderstanding as to purchaser's property rights and they could be appealing to county officials if asked to leave. Why not specify 90 days occupancy? Attorney Allen replied, that six months is a possible maximum aggregate time that would cover this. Supervisor Grant asked how this could be enforced? Attorney Allen said that they could do this on a contractual basis, which is clearly enforceable. Supervisor Tunnell, asked what the concern of the County was in occupancy limitations? Supervisor Clyde replied that the General Plan requires it. Supervisor Callahan expressed, in view of the many unanswered questions, wouldn't it be wise to return this proposal to Planning Commission for further study? Attorney Allen replied that they had had five public hearings before the Planning Commission already. Nothing could be gained by more consideration of the Planning Commission. We will accept occupancy limitation on Cabinas. H. H. Divelbiss, said that nothing would be gained by further Planning Commission study. Specific time limit of occupancy is the only thing that the Planning Commission has not specifically studied. Supervisor Clyde, replied that if a time limit is placed on the. Cabinas, it would have to go back to Planning Conmission for approval. John Mitchell, Deputy County Counsel said that the Board of Supervisors would have to request Planning Commission consideration if a specific occupancy time limit was placed on the Cabinas. Supervisor Grant felt strongly that there should be limitation on occupancy, not to exceed 120 days. Supervisor Tunnell saw no advantage to a 90 day limit over a 6 months limitation. Attorney George H. Allen, for the applicant, Macco Corporation, stated that his client hereby withdraws the appeal of condition 45 of the conditional use permit relative to annexation to the Goleta Flood Zone. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the matter of rezoning certain portions of subject property be referred back to the Planning Commission for a recommendation with the suggestion that the ''Cabina'' occupancy be limited to a period of time not to exceed 180 days and further, that this portion of subject hearings on the rezoning be and the same is hereby continued to Tuesday, October 13, 1970, at 2 o'clock p. m. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie and I ------------.,------------------~---- - -- ------ 1.04 - September 28, 1970 carried unanimously, it is ordered that the matter of the conditional use permit be referred back to the Planning Commission for a recommendation with a suggestion that ' the camping space occupancy be limited to a period of time not to exceed 180 days and, furtherr that this portion of subject hearing be and the same is hereby continued to Tuesday, October 13, 1970, at 2 o'clock, p . m. In the Matter of Execution of Right of Way Contract between the County of Santa Barbara and the Santa Barbara County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and Robert H. Davis and Martha Davis, conveying land needed for the construction and improvement of the Santa Maria Flood Zone No . 3 in the Fifth Supervisorial District, Parcel Nos. 3A and 3B, Folio No. 543 . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authori zed and directed to execute a Right of Way Contract between the County of Santa Barbara and the Santa Barbara County Flood Control and Water Conservation Dis- trict and Robert H. Davis and Martha Davis, conveying land needed for construction and improvement of the Santa Maria Flood Zone No. 3 in the Fifth Supervisorial District, Parcel Nos. 3A and 3B, Folio No. 543. In the Matter of Acceptance of Grant Deed, for consideration of $2,700.00 and under the terms and conditions of the Right of Way Contract between the County of Santa Barbara and the Santa Barbara County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and Robert H. Davis and Martha Davis, conveying land needed for the construction and improvement of the Santa Maria Flood Zone No . 3, in the Fifth Supervisorial District, Parcel Nos . 3A and 3B, Folio No . 543. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Grant Deed, for consideration of $3,700.00 and under the terms and conditions of the Right of Way Contract between the County of Santa Barbara and the Santa Barbara County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and Robert H. Davis and Martha Davis, conveying land needed for the construction and improvement of the Santa Maria Flood Zone No. 3, in the Fifth Supervisorial District, Parcel Nos . 3A and 3B be, and the same is hereby, accepted by the County of Santa Barhara . Upon motion, the Board adjourned sine die. The foregoing Minutes are hereby approved , J. er Approval of Minutes September 28 J 1970 Appeal of Raymond E. Spencer for P.A Andersen for Cond. Exception " Side Yard Adjustment at 1185 Anderso Lane, Goleta I October 5, 1970 Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California, October 5, 1970, at 9:30 o 'clock, a. m. Present: Supervisors George H. Clyde, Joe J . Callahan, Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell; and J. E. Lewis, Clerk. S11peryisor Clyde in the Chair In t he Matter of Approval of Minutes of September 28 , 1970 Meeting. Upon motion of Supervisor Callahan, seconded by Supervi sor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is order ed that the r eading of t he Minutes of t he September 28, 1970 meeting be dispensed with, and the Minutes approved as submitted. In t he Matter of Appeal of Raymond E. Spencer on behalf of P . A. Andersen from Planning Commission denial of request for Conditional Exception and Side Yard Adj ustment on property at 1185 Anderson Lane, Goleta (70-V-44). Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Call~an , and carried unanimously, it is ordered that Monday, October 26, 1970, at 2 o'clock, p . m. 9e, and the same is hereby set as the date and time for a public hearing on t he appeal of Raymond E. Spencer (70-V-44) from Planning Commission denial of requests, as follows: 1) A Conditional Exception to allow an eight (8) unit, two-story legal non-conforming apartment house t o remain on a proposed parcel with an area of 31,963 sq. ft. instead of 160,000 sq. ft. for eight (8) units. 2) An adj ustment to allow a side yard setback of 13.5 feet from the proposed northerly property l ine instead of the 15 feet required for a two-story buildi ng. 105 It is further ordered that notice be given by publication in the.Sah"ta Barbara News -Press, ~ a newsp~pe ~ of g~n~ral _ circulation, as follows, to-wit: NOTICE is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California, on Monday, October 26, 1970, at 2 o'clock, p . m., in the Board of Supervisors Hearing Room, Fourth Floor , County Administration Building, City of Santa Barbara, State of California, on the appeal of Raymond E. Spencer (70-V-44) from Planning Connnission denial of requests, as follows: 1) A Conditional Exception to allow an eight (8) unit, two-story legal . non=conforming apartment house to remain on a proposed parcel with an area of 31 ,963 square feet instead of 160,000 square feet for eight (8) units. 2) An adjustment to allow a side yard setback of 13.5 feet from the proposed northerly property line instead of the 15 feet required for a two-story building. WITNESS my hand and seal this 5th day of October, 1970. /S/ J.E.LEWIS, County Clerk (SEAL) J.E.LEW'Is, County Clerk and Ex-Officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors . It is further ordered t hat subject matter be and t he same is hereby, referred to the Planning Commission for submission of a report on the hearing date . 106 Approval of Plans and Spec for Painting Portions of th Santa Barbara County Courthouse I October 5, 1970 In the Matter of Approval of Plans and-Specifications for Painting Portions of the Santa Barbara County Courthouse, Santa Ba~bara, Santa Barbara County, California. '---- Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that plans and specifications for Painting Portions of the Santa Barbara County Courthouse, Santa Barbara , Santa Barbara County, California be, and the same is hereby, approved . It is further ordered that Thursday, October 22, 1970, at 3 o'clock, p . m. be, and the same is hereby, set as the date and time for the opening of bids on subject proposal in the Board of Supervisors' Conference Room located on the 4th floor of the Santa Barbara County Administration Building, 105 East Anapamu Street, Santa Barbara, California, 93104, and that notice be given by publication in the Santa Barbara News --Press, a newspaper of general circulation, as follows, to-wit: for - NOTICE is hereby given that the County of Santa Barbara will receive bids ''Painting Portions of the Santa Barbara County Courthouse, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara County, California'' Each bid will be in accordance with drawings and specifications approved by the Board of Supervisors and on file in the OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, COUNTY ENGINEERING BUILDING, 123 EAST ANAPAMU STREET, SANTA BARBARA, CALIFORNIA, WHERE THEY MAY BE EXAMINED AND COPIES SECURED BY PROSPECTIVE BIDDERS. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California (Amended by Statutes 1968, Chapter 699, Paragraph 1, operative July 1, 1969) the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara has directed the publishing of the prevailing rate of wages with a copy of the same being on file at the office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors . EACH BID SHALL BE MADE OUT ON A FORM TO BE OBTAINED AT THE OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS; shall be accompanied by a certified or cashier's check or bid bond for ten (10) percent of the amount of the bid, made payable to the order of the Treasurer of Santa Barbara County, Santa Barbara, California; shall be sealed and received in the Office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Santa Barbara County, County Administration Building, 105 East Anapamu Street, Santa Barbara, California, 93104, on or before 3:00 P . M. on the 22nd day of October, 1970, and will be opened and publicly read aloud at 3:00 P. M. 0 the day in the Board of Supervisors' Conference Room located on the 4th floor of the Santa Barbara County Administration Building. The above mentioned check or bond shall be given as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the contract if awarded to him and will be declared forfeited if the successful bidder refuses to enter into said contract after being requested so to do by the Board of Supervisors of said County. The Board of Supervisors of Santa Barbara County reserved the right to reject any or all bids or waive any informality in a bid. No bidder may withdraw his bid for a period of thirty (30) days after the date set for the opening thereof. Dated: October 5, 1970. J. E. LEWIS~ (SEAL) County Cler Santa Barbara, California , ' Approval of Plans Specs. for Goleta Pier Repair I I - j 107 October 5, 1970 In the Matter of Approval of Plans and Specifications for Goleta Pier Repair, Santa Barbara County, Calif6rnia. , Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that plans and specifications for ''Goleta Pier Repair, Santa Barbara County, California'' be, and the same is hereby, approved. - It is further ordered that Thursday, October 29, 1970 at 3 o'clock, p. m., be, and the same is hereby, set as the date and time for the opening of bids on subject proposal in the Board of Supervisors' Conference Room located on the 4th floor of the County Administration Building, 105 East Anapamu Street, Santa Barbara, California, 93104, and that notice be given by publication in the Santa Barbara News Press, a newspaper of general circulation, as follows, to-wit: NOTICE is hereby given that the County of Santa Barbara will receive bids for - "Goleta Pier Repair, Santa Barbara County, California'' Each bid will be in accordance wi~h drawings and specifications approved by the Board of Supervisors and on file in the OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC ~ WORKS, COUNTY ENGINEERING BUILDING, 123 EAST ANAPAMU STREET, SANTA BA~ARA, CALIF- ,., 4l OllNIA, WHERE THEY MAY BE EXAMINED AND COPIES SECURED BY PROSPECTIVE Bl!DiRS . Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California (Amended by Statutes 1968, Chapter 699, Paragraph 1, operative July 1, 1969) the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara has directed the publishing of the prevailing rate of wages with a copy of the same being on file at the office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors . EACH B I.D SHALL BE MADE OUT ON A FORM TO BE OBTAINED AT THE OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS; shall be accompanied by a certified or cashier' s check or bid bond for ten (10) percent of the amount of the bid, made payable to the I order of the Treasurer of Santa Barbara County, Santa Barbara, California; shall be sealed and received in the office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Santa Barbara County, County Admjnistration Building, 105 East Anapamu Street, Santa Barbara, California, 93104, on or before 3:00 P. M. on the 29th day of October, 1970, and will be opened and publicly read aloud at 3:00 P . M. of the day in the Board I of Supervisors' Conference Room located on the 4th floor of the Santa Barbara County Administration Building. The above mentioned check or bond shall be given as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the contract if awarded to him and will be declared forfeited if the successful bidder refuses to enter into said contract after being requested so to do by the Board of Supervisors of said County. The Board of Supervisors of Santa Barbara County reserves the right to reject any or all bids or waive any informality in a bid. No bidder may withdraw his bid for a period of thirty (30) days afterthe date set for the opening thereof. Dated: October 5, 1970. J. E. LEWIS~ (SEAL) County Cler Santa Barbara, California 1.08 I October 5, 1970 In the Matter of Resolution Amending Contract with MacDonald Corporation for Construction of Santa Maria Public Health Center 900 West Foster Road, Santa Maria, Resolution Amending Contract with MacDonald Corp for constructi of Santa Maria Public Health Center, 900 W. n california, Project 460 HC. (Change Order No. 2) Foster Rd. Santa Maria, C Change Ord;r No. 2 PREVAILING WAGE RAT"RS I Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO. 70-617 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) .In the Matter of Publication of Prevailing Wage Rates (Amendments) of Public Works Department. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Clerk be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to publish the following prevailing wage rates (amendments) of the Public Works Department in the Santa Barbara News-Press, a newspaper of general circulation, to-wit: ( J . , ) ~ NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS (NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS LIST) ( \ . . - COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA STATE OF CALIFORNIA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS Pursuant to the p r ovi sions of Secti on 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of Ca l ifor nia (Amended by Statutes 1968 Chapter 679 , Paragraph 1, oper a t ive July 1 , 1969) , the Boar d of Supervisor s of the County of Santa Bar bara having ascertained the general prevailing r ates of wage s and employer payments for heal th and welfare, vacations, pensions and similar purposes applicabl e to construction work does dir ect the fol lowing to be published: \ \ - . ' Basic Rate Per Hour 8.10 7.20 7. 07-1/2 6.29 7 .40 7.03 4.87 7.28-3/4 7.80-1/4 6.26 6.76 6.51 7.19 7.45 5.90 6.54 7.07-1/2 5.00 5.98 6.11 6.18 6.18 6.06 6.08 6.23 4.91 4.65 6.71 6.11 6.11 6.21 6.07 5.97 5.48 5.60 5.73 5.48 5.48 5.48 10/1/70 Classification Employer Payment H. and w. vac. & Hol. Pension Appr. Asbestos Worker Boilermaker Bricklayer Carpet & Lino Electrician Glazier Hod Carrier, Brick Hod Carrier, Plaster Lather Painter, Brush Painter, Spray Painter, Steel Plasterer Plumber & Fitter Roof er Sheet Metal worker Tilesetter Tile Helper 48 30 40' phw/p phw/p phw/p 21 phw/p 35 phw/p 30 phw/p 35 phw/p 35 phw/p 24 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 40 phw/p 10% phw/p 22 phw/p 39 phw/p 40 phw/p 14-1/2 Employer 67 phw/p 40 phw/p 40 phw/p deducted 29 phw/p 1 ()~ phw /p 37-1/2 II 1 . 00 phw/p 60 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 75 phw/p 13 phw/p 60 phw/p 73 phw/p 40 phw/p deducted 30 phw/p carpenter Shingler Hardwood Floor Worker Millwright Saw Filer Table Power Saw Oper. Pneumatic Nailer or Power Stapler 4 Employee 51 phw/p 51 phw/p 51 phw/p 51 phw/p 51 phw/p 51 phw/p 51 phw/p 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p Wood Fence Builder on Residential Projects 51 phw/p Roof Loader of Shingl es 51 Pile Driver Foreman 51 Pile Driver Man - 51 Bridge or Dock Carpenter phw/p phw/p phw/p and cable Splicer Pile Driver Man - Derrick Bargeman 51 phw/p Head Rockslinger Rocks linger Rock Bargeman or Scowman 51 51 51 Cement Mason Journeyman 70 Cement Mason 70 Cement Masons Floating 70 & Troweling Machine Oper. phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p curb & Gutter Machine 70 phw/p Operator (cement only) Clary & Similar Type of 70 phw/p Screed Operator Grinding Machine Oper. 70 phw/p (all types) 45 phw/p 45 45 45 phw/p phw/p phw/p 45 phw/p 45 45 45 50 50 50 phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p 50 phw/p 50 phw/p 50 phw/p 35 phw/p 55 phw/p 40 phw/p 2-l/2phw/p 2 phw/p 23 phw/p l-l/2phw/p 25 phw/p 30 phw/p 4 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 21-1/4 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 75 phw/p 16% phw/p 15 phw/p 40 phw/p 40 phw/p 34 phw/p 65 phw/p 65 phw/p 65 phw/p 65 phw/p 65 phw/p 65 phw/p 65 phw/p . 65 phw/p 65 phw/p 65 phw/p 65 phw/p 65 phw/p 65 phw/p 65 phw/p 65 phw/p 75 phw/p 75 phw/p 75 phw/p 75 phw/p 75 phw/p 75 phw/p 1 phw/p 1% phw/p 1/4 phw/p ' ; . Basic Rate Per Hour 5 .48 5.48 7 . 30 7.38 7.38 7 .21 4 .805 4.695 4.955 4.805 4.805 4.775 4.745 4.595 4 . 805 4.785 4.805 4 . 595 4.595 4.645 4.955 4.595 5 . 045 10/1/70 Classification Employer Payment H. and w. Vac. & Hol. Pension Appr. Jackson Vibratory & 70 phw/p Similar Type Screed Oper. Scoring Machine Operator70 Reinforcing Iron Worker 38 Structural Iron Worker 38 Ornamental Iron worker 38 Fence Erector 38 Asphalt Raker, Luteman 35 and Ironer Asphalt Shoveler 35 Blasters Powderman 35 Buggymobile Man 35 phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p Cement Dumper (on 1 Yd. 35 phw/p or larger mixer and handling bulk cement) Cesspool Digger and Installer 35 phw/p Chuc kt ender Cleaning and Handling of Panel Forms concrete core cutter, Grinder or Sander Concrete curer - Impervious Membrane and Form Oiler Concrete Saw Man, Cutting, Scoring Old or New Concrete Concrete Screeding for Rough Strike Off Concrete, Water Curing Cutting Torch Operator (Demolition) Cribber, Shorer, Lagging, sheeting and trench bracing, handguided lagging hammer Demolition Laborer, the cleaning of brick and lumber Driller: All power drills, excluding Jackhammer, whether core, diamond, wagon, track, multiple unit, and any and all other types of mechanical drills without regard to the form of motive power and excluding only that work otherwise awarded in Memo Understanding dated Miami, Fla. 2/3/54 35 35 phw/p phw/p 35 phw/p 35 phw/p 35 phw/p 35 phw/p 35 phw/p 35 phw/p 35 phw/p 35 phw/p 35 phw/p 50 phw/p 50 phw/p 50 phw/p 50 phw/p 50 phw/p 50 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 75 phw/p 75 phw/p 37-1/2 phw/p 37-1/2 phw/p 37-1/2 phw/p 37- 1/2 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p , , ,. . . Basic Rate Per Hour 4.885 4.595 4.695 4.595 4 . 595 4 . 595 4.805 4 . 935 4 . 675 5 .115 4 . 805 4 . 935 4.595 4. 595 4 . 72 4 . 695 4.595 10/1/70 Classification Employer Payment H. and w. Vac. & Hol. Pension Driller , Jackhammer, 2-1/2 ft . drill steel or longer Dry Packing of Concrete Plugging, Filling of Shee-Bolt Holes Fine Grader, Highway and Street Paving, Airports , Runways, and similar type heavy construction Fire Watcher, Limbers Brush Loaders, Pilers and Debris Handlers Flagman Gas & Oil Pipdine Laborer Gas & Oil Pipeline Wrapper - Pot Tender and Form Man Gas & Oil Pipeline wrapper - 6 inch pipe and over Guinea Chaser Head Rock Slinger Impact Wrench, MultiPlate 35 phw/p 35 phw/p 35 phw/p 35 phw/p 35 phw/p 35 phw/p 35 phw/p 35 phw/p 35 phw/p 35 phw/p 35 phw/p Kettlemen, Potmen and 35 phw/p men applying asphalt, l ay-kold, creosote , l ime caustic and similar type materials Labor er , General or 35 phw/p Construction Laborer, Temporary Water35 phw/p and Air Li nes Laborer Packing Rod 35 phw/p Steel & Pans Landscape Gardener & 35 phw/p Nursery Man (has knowledge of plant materials and how to plant them. Lays out plant arrangements to follow the landscape p l an ) Material Hoseman (Walls,35 phw/p Slabs, Floors and Decks ) 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p I Appr. . . , Basic Rate Per Ilour 4.595 4.805 4.905 4.785 4.905 4.805 4.905 4 . 595 4.785 10/1/70 Classification Mixer-Truck Chute Man (Walls, Slabs , Decks , Floors, Foundations and Footings-curb & gutter & sidewalks} H. and w. 35 phw/p Operator of Pneumatic , 35 phw/p Gas, Electri c Tools , Vibrating Machines & similar mechanical tools not separately classified herein Pipelayer performing all services in the laying & installing of pipe from the point of receiving pipe in the ditch until compl eti on of operation, including any and all forms of 35 phw/p tubular material, whether pipe, metallic or nonmetallic , conduit, and any other stationary type of tubular device used for the conveyi ng o f any substance or element whether water, sewage, solid, gas , air , or other product whatsoever and without regard to the nature of material from which the tubul ar material is fabricated Pipe Layer's Backup Man 35 phw/p coating, grouting, making of joints, sealing, caulking, diapering & incl uding rubber gasket joints, pointing and any and all other services Oversize Concrete Vibrator Operator, 70 pounds and over Power Broom Sweepers (small} Prefabricated Manhole Installer Rigging & Signalling Riprap Stonepaver, placing stone or wet sacked concrete 35 phw/p 35 phw/p 35 phw/p 35 35 phw/p phw/p Employer vac . & Hol . 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p Payment Pension 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p Appr . Basic Rate Per Hour 4 . 855 4 . 805 5 . 045 4.785 4.645 4 . 745 4.595 5 . 02 4.805 4 . 72 4 . 645 4.805 4.725 3 . 935 4.905 4.595 5 . 78 6 . 03 6.03 5.78 5 .78 6.03 6.03 5 .88 5 .78 6 . 28 5 .78 5 . 78 6 . 03 6 . 03 5 . 88 6 . 03 6.03 6 . 03 10/1/70 Classification Rock Slinger Roto Scraper & Tiller Sandblaster (Nozzleman) Sandblaster (Pot Tender) Scaler Septic Tank Digger & Installer (Lead Man) Slip Form Raisers Steel Headerboard Man & Guideline Setter Tampers, Barko, Wacker & similar type Tank Scaler & Cleaner Tarman & Mortarman Tree Climber, Faller, Chain Saw Operator, Pittsburgh Chipper or similar type Brush Shredders Trenching Machine, Hand Propelled Underground Laborer, including Caisson Bel l ower Watchman Welding in connection with Laborers' Work Window Cleaner Batch Plant Laborer Blaster, Driller Powderman Bull Gang Foreman Bull Gang Mucker, Trackman H. and W. 35 35 35 phw/p phw/p phw/p 35 phw/p 35 35 35 35 phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p 35 phw/p 35 35 35 phw/p phw/p phw/p 35 phw/p 35 phw/p 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p Changehouseman 35 Chemical Grout Jetman 35 Cherry Pickerman 35 Chucktender , Cabletender35 Concrete Crew, includes 35 phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p Rodders & Spreaders Diamond Driller Dumpman Dumpman , Outside Gr out GUnman Gr out Pumpman Helper for Steel Form Raiser & Setter Jackleg Miner Jumbo Man Kemper & Other Pneumatic Concrete Placer Operator 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p Employer Vac. & Hol. 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p Payment Pension 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 6 0 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p Appr. . Basic Rate Per Hour 6.03 5.88 6.03 6.03 6.28 6.03 6.03 5.78 6.03 5.78 6.03 5.78 5.88 6.09 6.03 6.03 6.03 6.03 6.03 6.03 6.03 6.03 6 . 27 6 . 27 6.27 6.27 6.27 6.27 6.27 6.27 6.27 6.27 6 . 27 10/1/70 Classification Miner - Tunnel (hand or machine) Nipper Powderman-Primer House Prim er Man Shaft & Raise Miner Shotcrete Man Steel Form Raiser & Setter H. and W. 35 phw/p 35 35 35 35 35 35 phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p Swamper (Brakeman & 35 phw/p Switchman on Tunnel Work) Timberman, Retirnber man 35 phw/p wood or steel Tool Man Tunnel Concrete Finisher 35 35 phw/p phw/p Tunnel Materials Hand- 35 phw/p ling Man Vibratorman, Jack Hammer, Pneumatic Tools (except driller) Brakeman Compressor Operator Deck Hand Engineer Oiler Generator Operator Heavy Duty Repairman Helper Pump Operator Signalman Switchman Building Construction Inspector 35 phw/p 45 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p Concrete Mixer Operator 35 phw/p Skip Type Conveyor Operator Fireman Generator, Pump or Compressor (2- 5 inclusive) Portal Unitsover 5 units, 10 per hour for each additional unit up to nine units Hydrostatic Pump Oper. Oiler Crusher (Asphalt or Concrete Plant) 35 35 35 35 35 phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p Plant Operator, Gener- 35 phw/p ator, Pump or compr essor Rotary Drill Helper 35 phw/p (oilfield) Skiploader-Wheel type up to 3/4 yd. without attachment 35 phw/p Soils Field Techni c i an 35 phw/p Employers Payment Vac . & Hol . Pension 25 phw/p 60 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/ p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p Appr. . Basic Rate Per Hour 6.27 6.27 6.27 6.27 6.51 6.51 6.51 6.51 6 . 51 6.51 6.51 6.51 6.51 6 . 51 6.51 6.62 6.62 6.62 6 . 62 6.62 6.62 6 . 62 6.62 6.62 6.62 6.62 6.62 6.62 6 . 62 10/1/70 Classification H. Tar Pot Fireman 35 Temporary Heating Pl ant 35 Operator Trenching Machine Oiler 35 Truck Crane Oiler 35 A-Frame or Winch Truck 35 Operator Chainman 35 Elevator Operator 35 (inside) Equipment Greaser 35 (rack) Ford Ferguson (with 35 dragtype attachments) Helicopter Radioman 35 (ground) Power Concrete Curing 35 Machine Operator Power Concrete Saw 35 Operator Power-Driven Jumbo 35 Form Setter Operator Ross Carrier Operator 35 ( jobsite) Stationary Pipe Wr apping35 & Cleaning Machine Operator Asphalt Plant Fireman 35 Boring Machine Operator 35 Boxman or Mixerman 35 (Asphalt or Concr ete) Chip Spreading Machine 35 Machine Operator Concrete Pump Operator 35 (small portable) Bridge Type Unloader 35 & Turntable Operator Dinky Locomotive or 35 Motorman (up to and including 10 ton) Equipment Greaser 35 (Grease Truck) Helicopter Hoist Oper. 35 Highline Cableway 35 Signalman Hydra-Hammer- Aero 35 Stomper Power Sweeper Oper a t or 35 Roller Operator 35 (compacting) Screed Operator 35 (Asphalt or Concr ete) Employers Payment a.nd W. vac . & Hol . Pension AEEr. phw/p 30 phw/p 80 phw/p phw/p 30 phw/p 80 phw/p phw/p 30 phw/p 80 phw/p phw/p 30 phw/p 80 phw/p phw/p 30 phw/p 80 phw/p phw/p 30 phw/p 80 phw/p phw/p 30 phw/p 80 phw/p phw/p 30 phw/p 80 phw/p phw/p 30 phw/p 80 phw/p phw/p 30 phw/p 80 phw/p phw/p 30 phw/p 80 phw/p phw/p 30 phw/p 80 phw/p phw/p 30 phw/p 80 phw/p phw/p 30 phw/p 80 phw/p phw/p 30 phw/p 80 phw/p phw/p 30 phw/p 80 phw/p phw/p 30 phw/p 80 phw/p phw/p 30 phw/p 80 phw/p phw/p 30 phw/p 80 phw/p phw/p 30 phw/p 80 phw/p phw/p 30 phw/p 80 phw/p phw/p 30 phw/p 80 phw/p phw/p 30 phw/p 80 phw/p phw/p 30 phw/p 80 phw/p phw/p 30 phw/p 80 phw/p phw/p 30 phw/p 80 phw/p phw/p 30 phw/p 80 phw/p phw/p 30 phw/p 80 phw/p phw/p 30 phw/p 80 phw/p , ' , Basic Rate Per Hour 6 . 62 6 . 62 6.8i 6.81 6.81 6 . 81 6.81. ' 6.8i 6.81 6.81 6.81 6.81 6.81 6.81 6.81 6.81 6.81 6.81 6.81 6.81 6.81 10/1/70 Classification Employers Payment H. and W. Vac . & Hol . Pension Rodman Trenching Machine Operator (up to 6 ft . ) Asphalt Plant Engi neer Concrete Batch Pl ant Operator-(Oiler or Journeyman- trainee required) (Where commercial power is not used, no less than one generator operator is required) (On multibatch plant uni ts not less than 1 Oper ator- Oiler and 1 additional employee) Backhoe Operator (up to and including 3/4 yd.) Bit Sharpener Concrete Joint Machine Operator (Canal and similar type} 35 35 35 35 phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p 35 phw/p 35 35 phw/p phw/p Concrete Planer Oper ator35 phw/p Derrickman (Oilfield 35 phw/p type) Deck Engine Operator Drilling Machine Operator (including water wells) Forklift Operator (under 5 tons capaci t y) Hydrographic Seeder Machine Operator (str aw pulp or seed) Instrumentman Machine Tool Operator Maginnis Inter nal Full Slab Vibrator Mechanical Berm, curb or gutter (concrete or asphalt) Mechanical Finisher Operator (concreteClary- Johnson-Bidwell or similar) 35 35 phw/p phw/p 35 phw/p 35 phw/p 35 35 35 phw/p phw/p phw/p 35 phw/p 35 phw/p Pavement Breaker 35 phw/p Operator (truck mounted, Oiler-Ja.irneyrnan- trai nee required) Road Oil Mixing Machine 35 phw/p Operator Roller Operator (asphalt or finish ) 35 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p Appr_. . , Basi. c' Rate Per Hour 6 . 81 6.81 6 . 81 6.81 6.81 6.81 6.81 6.81 6 . 81 6 . 91 6 . 91 6 . 91 6.91 6 . 91 6.91 6 . 91 6.91 10/1/70 Classification Rubber Tired Earth Moving Equipment (single engine, up to and including 25 yd. struck) Self-Propelled Tar Pipelining Machine Operator H. and w. 35 phw/p 35 phw/p Slip Form Pump Operator 35 phw/p (power-driven hydraulic lifting device for concrete forms) Tugger Hoist (1 drum) Tunnel Locomotive Operator (over 10 and up to and includi ng 30 tons) 35 35 phw/p phw/p Stinger Crane (Aust i n- 35 phw/p Western or similar type) Skiploader Operator 35 phe/p (Crawler and Wheel Type over 3/4 yd. and up to and including 1-1/2 yds . ) Tractor Operator 35 phw/p Bulldozer , Tamper Scraper(single engine, up to 100 h/p, flywheel and similar types, up to and including D- 5 and similar types) Welder - General Asphalt or Concrete Spreading Operator (tamping or finish i ng) 35 35 phw/p phw/p Asphalt Paving Machi ne 35 phw/p Operator (Barber Green or similar type-2 screedrnan required) BHL Lima Road Pactor, 35 phw/p Wagner Pactor or similar, Operator Bridge Crane Operator Cast in Place Pipe Laying Machine Oper ator Combination Mixer and Compressor Operator (Gunite Work) 35 35 phw/p phw/p 35 phw/p Concrete Pump Operator 35 phw/p (truck mounted) Oiler required Concrete Mixer Oper ator 35 phw/p Paving (Oiler or Ja.i r neyman trainee requ i red} Employers Payment Vac . & Hol . Pension 30 phw/p 80 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p Appr . , Basic Rate Per Hour 6.91 6.91 6.91 6.91 6 . 91 6 . 91 6.91 6.91 6 . 91 6 . 91 6.91 6 . 91 6.91 6 . 91 6.91 6.91 6.91 6 . 91 6 . 91 6.91 10/1/70 Classification Employers Payment H. and w. Vac . & Hol . Pension Crane Operator (up to and including 25 ton capacity) (Oiler or Journeyman-trainee required)(Long Boom 35 phw/p pay applicable) Crushing Plant Operator 35 phw/p (Oiler or Journeymantrainee required)(Where commercial power is not used, no less than one generator operator is required) Drill Doctor Elevating Grader Oper. Forklift Operator (over 5 tons) Grade Checker Gradall Operator (Oiler or J~rneymantrainee required) 35 35 35 35 35 Grouting Machine Oper. 35 Heading Shield Operator 35 Heavy Duty Repairman 35 Hoist Operator (Chicago 35 Boom & similar type) phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p Kolman Belt Loader 35 phw/p and similar type (Oiler or Journeyman-trainee required) LeTourneau Blob 35 phw/p Compactor or similar type Lift Slab Machine 35 phw/p Operator (Vatburg and similar types) Lift Mobile Operator (Oiler or Journeymantrainee required) Loader Operator (Athey, Euclid, Sierra and similar type-Oiler or Journeyman-trainee requ ired) 35 phw/p 35 phw/p Material Hoist Operator 35 phw/p Muck ing Machine " 35 phw/p (1/4 yd.-Oiler or Journeyman-trainee required-rubber-tired rail or track type) Pneumatic Concrete 35 phw/p Placing Machine Operator (Hackley-Presswell or similar type) Pneumatic Heading Shield (tunnel) 35 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p Appr. , Basi c Rate Per Hour 6 . 91 6 . 91 6.91 6.91 6.91 6.91 6.91 6.91 6.91 6.91 6.91 6.91 6.91 6.91 10/1/70 Classification H. and W. Pumpcrete Gun Operator 35 phw/p Rotary Drill Operator 35 phw/p (excluding Caisson type} (Oiler or Journeymantrainee required) Rubber-Tired Earth 35 phw/p Moving Equipment Operator (Single engine-Caterpillar, Euclid, Athey Wagon, and similar types with any and all attachments over 25 yds . and up to and including 50 Employers Payment vac . & Hol . Pension 30 phw/p 80 phw/p 30 phw/p 80 phw/p 30 phw/p 80 phw/p cu.yds. struck) Rubber-Tired Scraper Operator(Self-loadingPaddle wheel type- John 35 phw/p 1 30 phw/p 80 phw/p Deere, 1040 and similar single unit) Skiploader Operator 35 phw/p (Crawler and Wheel typeover 1-1/2 yds., up to and including 6- 1/2 yds . ) Surf ace Heaters and 35 phw/p Planer Operators Rubber-Tired Earth 35 phw/p Moving Equipment Operator multiple engine up to and including 25 yds. struck) Trenching Machine 35 phw/p Operator (over 6 ft . depth capacity, manufacturers rating) (Oiler or Journeymantrainee required) Tower crane Operator (two operators required at all times) 35 phw/p Tractor Compressor 35 phw/p Drill Combination Operator Tractor Operator 35 phw/p (any type larger than D-5-100 Flywheel h . p. and over, or similar) Bull Dozer, Tamper, Scraper and Push Tractor, single engine) Tractor Operator 35 phw/p (Boom attachments) Traveling Pipe Wrapping 35 phw/p Cleaning and Bending Machine Operator Tunnel Locomotive Operator 35 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p Appr . Basic Rate Per Hour 6.91 7.01 7.01 7.01 7. 01 7 . 01 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 7.01 10/1/70 Classification H. and W. Shovel. Backhoe , Dragline, Clamshell Operator, over 3/4 yd. 35 phw/p and up to 5 cu . yd. M. R. C. ) (Oiler or journeyrnantrainee required) (Long Boom pay applicable) Crane Operator-Over 25 35 phw/p ton up to and including 100 tons (Long Boom pay applicable) (Oil er or Journeyman-trainee required) (or two operator s) Derrick Barge Oper ator 35 phw/p (Long Boom pay applicable) Dual Drum Mixer 35 phw/p (Oiler or Journeyrnantrainee required) Monorail Locomotive Operator (Diesel , gas or electric) 35 phw/p Motor Patrol-Blade 35 phw/p Operator (single engine) Multiple Engine Tractor 35 phw/p Operator (Euclid and similar type, except Quad 9 Cat) Party Chief 35 phw/p Rubber-Tired Earth 35 phw/p Moving Equipment Operator single engine over fifty yds. struck Rubber-Tired Earth 35 phw/p Moving Equipment Operator (Multiple engine, Eucl id Caterpillar and similar) (Over 25 yds. and up to 50 cu.yds. struck) Tractor Loader Operator 35 phw/p (Crawler and wheel type over 6-1/2 yds . ) Tower Crane Repairman 35 phw/p Shovel, Backhoe, Drag- 35 phw/p line, Clamshell Operator (over 5 cu. yd. M. R. C. ) (Oiler or Journeyrnantrainee required) (Long Boom pay applicable) Welder - Certified Woods Mixer Operator and similar Pugrnill Equipment Heavy Duty Repairman Welder combination 35 35 phw/p phw/p 35 phw/p Employers Payment vac . & Hol . Pension 30 phw/p 80 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/ p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p Appr . r Basi c Rate Per Hour 7.15 7.15 . 7 . 15 7 . 15 7 . 15 7 . 15 7 . 15 7 . 15 7 . 15 7 . 15 7 . 15 7 . 15 7 . 15 7 . 15 7 . 15 10/1/70 Classifi cation Employers Payment H. and W. vac. & Hol . Pension Auto Grader Oper ator 35 phw/ p (2 Grade Checkers and 1 additional employee required) Automatic Slip Form 35 phw/p Operator (Grade Checker, Screedman, Oiler or Journeyman- t r ainee required) Crane Oper ator -- 35 phw/p over 100 tons (Oiler, Journeyman- t r ainee or 2 operator s requ i r ed) (Long Boom pay applicabl e ) Hoist Operator, St iff 35 phw/p Legs , Guy Derricks o r similar types (capable of hoisting 100 tons or more) (Oiler or Journey-man trainee required) Mass Excavator Oper ator 35 phw/p (2 operators and oil e r or Journeyman- trainee required) Mechanical Finishing 35 phw/p Machine Operator Mobile Form Travel er 35 phw/p Operator Motor Patrol Oper ator 35 phw/p (multi- engine) Pipe Mobile Machi ne 35 phw/p Operator (2 oper a t o r s required) Rubber-Tired Earth 35 phw/p Moving Equipment Oper ator (multiple engine, Eucli d , Caterpillar and simil a r type over 50 cu. yds . struck) Rubber-Tired Self 35 phw/p Loading Scraper Oper ator (Paddle Wheel- Auger type self-loading-2 or mor e units) Rubber-Tired Scraper 35 phw/p Operator-pushing o ne another Push Cat, Pus h - Pull (50 per hr. addi - tional to base rate ) Tandem Equipment Oper. 35 phw/p (2 units only) Tandem Tractor Oper a t o r 35 phw/p (Quad 9 or simil ar t y p e ) Tunnel Mgle Bor i ng 35 phw/p Macnine perator 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p Appr . , Basic Rate Per Hour 7 . 60 7.60 7.60 7 . 60 7 . 60 7.60 5 . 735 5.23 5.23 5 . 0 5 5 . 08 5 . 13 5 . 21 5 . 43 5 . 89 6.015 5.05 10/1/70 Classification H. and W. Canal Liner Operator (not less than 4 employees : Operator , 35 phw/p Oiler, Welder-Mechanic , Grade Checker required) Canal Trirruner Oper ator 35 phw/p (Operator, Oiler , and two other employees covered by this agreement required) Helicopter Pilot 35 Highline cableway Oper. 35 Remote Controlled 35 Earth Moving Equi pment Operator (no one Operator shall operate mor e than 2 pieces of earth moving equi pment at one time) ($1. 00 per hour additional to base rate) phw/p phw/p phw/p Wheel Excavator Oper. 35 phw/p (over 750 cu . yds . per hour-~perators and 1 Oiler or Journeyrnantrainee and 2 Heavy Duty Repairman required) A-Frame or Swedish crane or similar type equipment driver Bootman Cement Distributor Truck Driver of Dump Tr uck of less than : 4 yds . water level 4 yds . but less than 8 yds. water level 65 phw/p 65 65 65 65 phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p 8 yds . but less than 65 phw/p 12 yds . water l evel 12 yds . but less than 65 phw/p 16 yds . water level 16 yds . but less than 65 phw/p 25 yds . water level 25 yds . but less than 65 phw/p 40 yds . water level 40 yds . or more water 65 phw/p level (single unit or combination of vehicl es) Driver of Truck Legal Payload Capacity: Less than 6 Tons (Inc . all vehicl es less than 6 Tons) 65 phw/p Empl oyers Payment vac . & Hol . Pension 30 phw/p 80 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 55 phw/p 55 phw/p 55 phw/p 55 phw/p 55 phw/p 55 phw/p 55 phw/p 55 phw/p 55 phw/p 55 phw/p 55 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 45 phw/p 45 phw/p 45 phw/p 45 phw/p 45 phw/p 45 phw/p 45 phw/p 45 phw/p 45 phw/p 45 phw/p 45 phw/p Appr. ' . Basic Rate Per ilour S . 08 5 . 13 5.21 5 .43 5 .43 5 . 23 5 .29 5 .43 5 .29 5 .43 6 . 015 5 .735 5 .23 5 .23 5 . 735 5 . 05 5 . 38 5 .11 10/1/70 Classification Employers Payment H. and W. Vac. & Hol. Pension Driver of Truck Legal Puyloud Capacity: 6 Tons to 10 Tons 10 Tons to 15 Tons 15 Tons to 20 Tons 20 Tons or more Driver of Dumpster or Dumpster Truck Driver of Road Oil Spreader Truck Driver of Transit-Mix Truck - under 3 yds. Driver of Transit-Mix Truck - 3 yds. or more Dumpcrete Truck less than 6-1/2 yds . water level 65 65 65 65 65 phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p phw/p 65 phw/p 65 phw/p 65 phw/p 65 phw/p Dumpcrete Truck, 6-1/2 65 phw/p yds . water level & over DW 10 and DW 20 Euclid- 65 phw/p type Equipment , LeTourneau Pulls , Terra Cobras and similar types of equipment also PB and similar type trucks when performing work within the Teamster jurisdiction, regardless of types of attachment and when pulling Aqua/Pak and water tank trailer Fork Lift Driver Fuel Truck Pipeline and Utility Working Truck Driver including Winch Truck but limited to trucks applicable to pipeline and utility work, where a composite crew is used 65 65 65 phw/p phw/p phw/p Ross Carrier Driver 65 phw/p Highway Traffic-Control Pilot Car , excluding moving heavy equipment, permit loads 65 phw/p Truck Greaser & Tireman 65 phw/p (25 per hr. additional when working on tire sizes above 24-inch wheel diameter) Truck Mounted Power 65 phw/p Broom 55 phw/p 55 phw/p 55 phw/p 55 phw/p 55 phw/p 55 phw/p 55 phw/p 55 phw/p 55 phw/p 55 phw/p 55 phw/p 55 phw/p 55 phw/p 55 phw/p 55 phw/p 55 phw/p 55 phw/p 55 phw/p 45 phw/p 45 phw/p 45 phw/p 45 phw/p 45 phw/p 45 phw/p 45 phw/p 45 phw/p 45 phw/p 45 phw/p 45 phw/p 45 phw/p 45 phw/p 45 phw/p 45 phw/p 45 phw/p 45 phw/p 45 phw/p Appr. .~_ ' Basic Rate Employers Payment Per Hour Classification H. a.nd W. vac . & Hol. Pension 6 . 015 Truck Repairman 65 phw/p 55 phw/p 45 phw/p 5 . 285 Truck Repairman Helper 65 phw/p 55 phw/p 45 phw/p 6 . 115 Truck Repairman-Welder 65 phw/p 55 phw/p 45 phw/p 4.97 Warehouseman & Teamster 65 phw/p 55 phw/p 45 phw/p 5 .11 warehouseman Clerk 65 phw/p 55 phw/p 45 phw/p 5.11 Water or Tank-Type 65 phw/p 55 phw/p 45 phw/p Truck Driver - under 2500 gallons 5 . 23 Water or Tank-Type 65 phw/p 55 phw/p 45 phw/p Truck Driver - 2500 gallons to 4000 gallons 5 . 35 Water or Tank-Type 65 phw/p 55 phw/p 45 phw/p Truck Driver - 4000 gall ons and over 6.015 Welder 65 phw/p 55 phw/p 45 phw/p Winch Truck Driver - 12-1/2 per hr . additional when operating power winch, or similar special attachments By order of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California, made this 5th day of October, 1970. J . Bo 10/1/70 ' Appr . I Resolution that all ballots in Nov. 3, 1970 General Electio be counted at desig p es I Resolution Annexing Territory to County Service Area No. 3 in Goleta Valley, Tract 10,699, Unit 3 with 100% consent I Resolution Bstab. ''No Parking Zones'' on Portions of Walnut Lane, 3r District / Releasing 85% of Road Improvement Bon for Tract #11,089 I Change Order No.l fo Burton Mesa Blvd. Project No.4046.1 I Request of Authorization t perform Slurry Seal Work on certain More Mesa Streets I I October 5, 1970 In the Matter of Resolution providing that all ballots in November 3, 1970 General Election shall be counted at designated central counting places. ted 109 Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO. 70-618 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Resolution Annexing Territory to County Service Area No. 3 in Goleta Valley, Tract 10,699, Unit 3. (LAFCO Resolution No. 213 Approving Annexation on 100% Consent Petition) Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried un~imously, it is ordered that the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLurION NQ, 70-619 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FilE) In the Matter of Resolution Establishing ''No Parking Zones'' on Portions of Walnut Lane, Third District. Upon motion of Supervisor. Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and car- ried unanimously, it is ordered that the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESQLUTlON NO, 70-620 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Releasing 85% of Road Improvement Bond and Dedication of Streets for Tract #11,089. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that 85% of the following road improvement bond for Tract #11,089 be released, or if a separate bond in the amount of 15% of the road improvement bond is posted, all of the original bond may be exonerated, as provided in Ordinance No. 1358; and that the same are hereby, accepted, as recommended by the Road Commissioner: Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company as Surety, Bur-Van Associates as Principal, in the Amount of $14,000.00, Bond No. 3947954, dated February 2, 1970. In the Matter of Authorizing Chairman to Execute Balancing Change Order No. 1 to Contract with Diani Construction Company for Construction of Improvements on Burton Mesa Boulevard, Project No. 4046.1 . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to execute the following Balancing Change Order to contract with Diani Construction Company for Construction of Improvements on Burton Mesa Boulevard, Lompoc, Fourth District, Project No. 4046.1. Number 1, increase of $2,877.12 . In the Matter of Request of Authorization to Perform Slurry Seal Work on certain More Mesa Streets, on request of More Mesa Homeowners Association, at approximate cost of $90Q.(bto land owners. Advertising Contract with Goleta Valley Chamber of CoUJDerce FY 1970-1971 I October 5, 1970 Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the above-entitled matter is hereby approved. In the Matter of Execution of Advertising Contract with Goleta Valley Chamber of Commerce FY 1970-71, not to exceed $22,500.00. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the fol l owing resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO. 70-621. (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) Resources In the Matter of Releasing the Director of the Department of Resources * Collections released from Collections f rom Further Accountability for Collection of Certain Delinquent Accounts. Further Accountability Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carfor Collection of Certain ried unanimously, this Board hereby determines that the following amounts are too Delinquent Accounts smal l to justify the cost of collection, or that the collection of such amounts is I Execution of Rental Agreeme t between the County of S.B. improbable for the reasons set forth in the verified applications of the Director, of the Department of Resources * Collections, and it is ordered that the Director be, and he is hereby, discharged from further accountability for the collection of the following amounts, in accordance with Section 25257 of the Government Code: (SEE PAGE 111 FOR LIST) In the Matter of Authorizing Chairman and Clerk to Execute Rental Agreement between the County of Santa Barbara and Jesse C. and Theresa A. Ruiz for Mental Health Jesse C. Theresa A. Rui for Mental Hea Services Off ic Space 1079 Air.B Peralta St., Guadalupe, 5th Supervisorial District for a one-yr. period Services Office Space, 1079 A * B, Peralta Street, Guadalupe, Fifth Supervisorial t 1bistrict, at the Rate of $300.00 per Month for Total of $3600.00 beginning October 15, 1970, and ending October 14, 1971, for a one-year period. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, I authorized and directed to execute a rental agreement between the County of Santa Barbara and Jesse C. and Theresa A. Ruiz, to provide for Mental Health Services Office Space at 1079 A * B, Peralta Street, Guadalupe, California, at the rate of $300 per month, beginning October 15, 1970, and ending October 14, 1971, for a one-year period. It is further ordered that the County Auditor be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to draw the necessary warrants, in the amount of $300 per month, in favor of Jesse C. and Theresa A. Ruiz, for the rental payments; said warrants to be drawn upon submission of the proper Demand of Payment form, as submitted by the landlord each and every month. Right of Way G ant Conveyed on Donation Basis Paul J. Wiener to the County S.B. for Road Purposes, Elwo d In the Matter of Acceptance of Right of Way Grant Conveyed on Donation Basis Acres No. 2, Parcel 5.1, Jr District I bjY Paul J. Wiener to the County of Santa Barbara for Road Purposes, Elwood Acres No . 2, f Parcel 5.1, Third District . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that a Right of Way Grant dated September 23, 1970, conveyed on a donation basis by Paul J. Wiener to the County of Santa Barbara for road purposes, Elwood Acres No. 2, Parcel 5.1, Third District, be, and the same is hereby, accepted 111 x.D!U 1 . . ., , - , c \ - . EOARD OF SUPERVISORS ; . ' . . ' \ , . ~.Board of Supervisors Barbara County Barbara , California . Santa Santa Gentlemen : I Pursuant to the provisions of Section 25257 of the Government Code , the undersigned her eby certifies that the collections of the following accbunts is impossible, and the undersigned Tequests that he be discharged from further accountability for the collection of such accounts , as provided in .said. section These accounts have been assi gned to the Department of Resources. and Collections by the Santa Bar bara County General Hospital . Subsequent investig&t ion and follow-up indicates the listed accounts to be uncollectible for reasons shown on the attached sheets and ju.s tify our recommendations. N.rl.IlE Allen, Michael R. Alva , Helen Ander son , Rick Ander son , Robert R. Aro , Arthur Arterburn , Jack V. Ayres, Victor Baltramaitis , Clement Barton , Sam K. Bekes , Robert Berge , . Henry L. Bernal , Carlos Biesanz , .t'iichael P. Bigwood , David 1,J . Blackwood , Ellen D. Buchanan , Mary E. Burtsfield, Charles Buse , Francis Bush , Oliver Campbell , Linda D. Campbell , William H. Canniff, Ralph A. Castillo , David Chase, :I?avid L. Chavez , Francisco Chavez , Gilbert R. Clemens, Denni s H. Conelly, Paul E. Contr eras, Thomas Cree, Robert Cumberledge, Robert C. Czarnecki, Dan Dagle , Paul A. Davis , Gary Lee Davis , John E. Davis , Capt. John F. Diller , Russell Dominguez , Manuel Doran, Lav1rence Dorland , Gregory Driscoll , Mrs . John Droescher, Howard L. Jr. Drtina , Bo Dunn , Frank Dunne , Timothy Dyer , Wallace M. Easter, Eugene Emery , Maurice Escobar , Floyd Ferrel , Faye H. Figuer oa , .Henry DATE 4- 9- 70 10- 29-69 5- 24-70 ' 3- 27- 70 5- 22-69 1- 16- 70 4- 8-69 10- 21-68 3- 11- 66 9- 12-68 1- 25-70 3- 19-70 1- 24-70 8- 8-69 12- 8-64 12- 30-69 11- 13-68 11- 6-68 6- 6-69 4-14-69 7- 21-69 5- 23-69 10- 29-69 9- 17- 68. 1- 3-68 5- 26-70 8- 4-69 11- 12- 68 8-13-68 5- 24- 70 1- 17- 69 4- 8- 70 11- 13-69 7- 18- 68 4- 22- 70 1- 6-69 4- 15- 70 11- 10- 69 7- 25-69 5- 28- 70 3- 6- 69 8- 20-68 11- 17-68 1- 20-68 11- 9-68 3- 24-70 7- 6-68 2- 5- 70 2- 21-70 10-20-69 9-23-64 LI ST . 7 B 144 Amb. 7 B 7 c 2 G 5 A 2 G 2 G 1 2 G 5 A 7 B 5 B 1:52 Amb. 73 5 A 2 E 3 L 2 G 3M 7 D 3M 7 D 2 G 278 7 B 144 Amb. 2 G 2 G 7 B 3 :t-1 7 B 7 D 87 Amb. 7 D 3M 7 D 7 D 2 I 7 D 3M 2 F 2 I 2 F 3M 7 B . 3M 5 B 5 B 118 Amb. 60 AMOilllT $ 16.00 37.00 8 . 50 17. 30 15. 20 8 . 50 20 . 25 47. 60 19. 60 16. 70 17.75 20.15 36. 50 49.00 58.45 13. 30 3,286.60 11. 50 17. 90 465 .15 10.00 105.00 11 .15 515.80 420.20 8 . 50 26. 25 472.45 18.00 8. 50 10. 50 14.50 11.75 25 . 50 8 . 50 5. 50 18.10 8 50 24. 55 5. 50 17.40 18. 70 795 . 00 34. 00 7 .00 19. 95 11 . 50 29 .00 8 . 50 117.00 277. 23 Page 2 ' .N.Al'lE DltTE LIST AMOUNT Fleming , Patrick D. 1- 5-69 2 I 144.00 Flores , Manuel s. 4- 18-69 2 I 32. 30 Foley , Edward E. 1- 20- 69 3 i'l 5 .50 Foust , Gerald D 7- 25-68 2 F 60. 80 Fulkerson , Ann 4- 4- 70 7 E 8 . 50 Garcia , r-ielisio 7- 27- 69 2 K 31 . 75 Gardner , \.Jilli am 11-9-69 7. E-. 13. 60 Garner , Fraly R. 4- 4-69 7 E , 23 . 50 f Garoute , Robert 6- 25- 69 . _ 2 K 19. 80 Garrepy , Richard 4- 1- 70 7 B 22.85 Garrett , Elber t 10- 6-69 2 K 19 . 50 Gaut , Ray 7- 31-69 7 E 42.25 Gibson , Douglas 4- 30- 70 7 E 8.~o Gilbert, Earl 6- 15- 69 142 Amb. 32 . 0~ Gomez , Luciano A. 3- 13-69 7 E 17.2 Gottesman, Her bert , 9- 22-68 2 K 8 . 75 Greene, Leonard 7- 18-68 , 7 E 8 . 50 Hall , Hollis E 4- 3-69 3M 36 .15 Harrison , Christine 7- 6-69 3M 20. 50 Ha\vkins , Mike D. J~. 11- 13-69 3M 95. 95 Ha\vley , Geor ge a B. 4-10- 70 7 B 13.75 Hernandez , Jesus 3- 7- 70 6 D 19. 25 Hernandez , Mr s . Joan 8- 4-70 144 Amb. 26 . 25 Hernandez , Lucy R. 1-22-69 7 G 15. 65 Hill, Thomas 4- 4-69 142 Amb. 22 . 50 Holmes , Leslie D. 12- 6-69 5 A 18. 50 Huffman , Burdette 4- 28-69 2 L 38. 60 Johnson , Harold L. 10-17-69 7 G 12.40 Johnson , Jesse E. 3- 11-69 , 7 G 12. 50 Johnson , Robert L. 8-10-69 7 G 11. 50 Jones , James N. 8- 6-69 3M 21 . 25 Joslyn, Wilbur 4- 7-69 130 Amb. 36. 25 Keel er, Harold Edward 12-10- 69 7 G 8 . 50 Kel logg , William 8-18-68 2 M 27.00 Keppel , Rudol ph E. 2- 21- 69 7 G 17. 50 Ki nnamon , Herbert 3- 26- 69 4 ll 22 . 30 \ Knox, John r-1. 2- 27- 69 7 G 5. 25 Koch , Jienry J. 5- 29-69 4 B 56. 50 Koch , John 8- 26- 69 4 A 14.90 Kowalski , Stanley 1- 14-70 138 Amb. 36.00 Kunkle , James N. 9- 5-69 2 M 23 . 50 Landers , Willard J . 2- 12- 69 . . 2 0 68. 70 Langdon , Eli zabeth 4- 4- 70 7 D 14.00 I Larson , Robert 3- 17- 70 6 D 8 . 50 I Leach , Terry 5-11- 70 7 B 8 . 50 Lee Chenoweth , Mary 9- 2- 68 2 0 247. 90 Lester, Roy J . 4- 23- 70 7 B 18.45 Li etzow , Rita 11- 16-69 143 Amb. 33 .75 Livingston , Robert 1- 17- 70 7 H 18. 30 Llamas , Alphonso 10- 29- 69 144 Amb. 37.00 Lockhart , Alison 9- 6-69 2 0 17. 30 Lopez , Angelo 1-28-69 7 H 5. 50 Lopez, Ramon 12- 12-69 7 H 8. 50 Lowry, Jeffr ey J . 1- 13- 70 7 G 8. 50 Lundsfor d , Herman 1- 23- 69 4 A 5. 50 Lundstrom , St even 11- 2- 69 7 H 8. 50 Machado , Margaret 3- 28- 70 7 B 8. 50 Macvicar , Sheila 11- 24- 68 4 A 6 . 50 Mahaffey, Chuck 11- 28- 69 5 B 8 . 50 Marqui s.s , Don C. 1- 22- 70 5 A 9 . 75 Marshall , Donald 11- 22- 68 7 H 5. 25 I - Martin , Don 2- 10- 70 7 H 7. 50 I Mar tinez , Richard 10- 13-69 4A 5. 50 Medland , Br ian 9-11- 69 140 Amb. 39 . 50 Mendoza , Samuel 12-16- 68 7 H 5. 50 Mer cado , Caremelo 11-26- 68 7 H 10.00 Merri l l , Melvin 11- 26-69 7 H 11. 50 M11l ler, Ora L. 10-13~69 144 Amb . 36.00 - # ' 0 'NAME f'li tchell , Eugene f'loloney, Barbara J. l'lontiel, Fred i"Ioore, Allen Muller., Michael J !'lyers; Melvin !-le Clellan, Allen !'le Clung, J~ck Mc Coy, Dave Mc Gowan, Michael ~c Reynolds , Robert Mc Roberts, Charles Neal , Leroy Neely, Charles Nevarez , Hermelo H. Nuno, Jose Oliver, Jesse M Ollar , Loretta Ortiz, Rudy Owens , Robert Papas, Ralph Palmer , Nettie Pardo , Teddy Parish , Linda Peterson , Wallace Ponce, Richard C. Potts, Mrs. J . Popa , Phyllis Purkey , Donald Ramirez, iiorberto Rarnjrez, Raymond Rasmussen , Lynn Ratcliff, Roberta Raymond, Neil Regan , Philip Reid , Robert Rennie , Raymond Richardson, Andrew Righetti, Kyle Rigsby , Clarence Ritchie, William Roadruck , David Roath , Gilbert Roback, George Roberts, Anton Robinson , Clifford Rodriquez, Pedro Rogers, Ro'Qert Rohrer, Robert Rosborough , Evelyn Ross, John Rudd , Davelle Ruiz, John Ruti ve, Barbara Sandoval, Emilio Schlesselman, John Schnider, Robert Schragl , Raymond Schvreibinz , Germaine Scott, !-1rs. Robert Scott , Virginia Seaman, Carmen Seville, ~igue l Shafer, Brian Shaloob, Skip Silva, Ray Simms , George Slosson, Jud ,.===~~- - - Page 3 DATE LIST 5-13-69 4' ' A 11-6-68 3 A 12- 6-68 3 A 5- 25-70 7 B 1- 18-69 3A 1-24-68 100 Amb . I 4- 4-69 142 Amb. 8- 23- 69 3 K 5- 23-69 3 B 5- 10-69 6 D 7-18-68 3 B 12-13-68 3 B 12- 19- 69 5 A 7- 19-69 3 B 11- 1-63 1 10- 30- 68 3 B 11- 21-68 3 c . 7- 11-69 124 Amb. " 3- 6-69 4 A 2- 25- 70 5 B 4- 19-69 142 Amb. 2- 9- 70 5 B 1- 22-68 281 7- 7- 68 3 c 11-13-68 4 A 1- 29- 70 5. B 1- 25-69 ~ -- 3 D 9- 24-69 144 Amb. 9- 21-68 3 D 1- 16- 70 5 B 8-18-68 3 F 11- 26-69 5 B 4- 26-69 6 B 9-10- 68 4 A 4- 2-70 7 B 5- 11-70 3 F 8- 20-69 5 B 9- 6-68 3 F 11-28-68 4 A 2- 18-70 5 B 8- 31- 68 3 F 5- 22- 69 3 K 7- 2- 69 3 F 1- 3-69 3 F . 4- 27- 70 7 B 11- 22- 68 125 Amb. 12- 26-68 3 F 1-19-70 5 B 8- 18-69 3 G 7- 26-69 5 A 4- 28-70 7 B 10-13-69 144 Amb. 10-9- 68 4 A 5-19- 69 142 Amb. 11- 4- 68 4 B 12-11- 69 5 B 4-18- 70 7 B 10- 12- 69 5 A 12- 7-69 143 Amb. 12- 22- 69 5 A 4- 1-69 4 B 4- 26- 70 6 D 3-16- 70 7 B 9- 6-68 . 3 H 2- 5-70 5 B 11-26-63 20 1-20- 69 3 H 5-10-69 151 Amb. AMOUNT 19. 50 34. 30 16.70 17. 00 24.28 36.00 22.50 188. 15 19. 25 11. 75 21 . 80 . 14.50 16.00 26.00 383 .00 69.60 25. 50 30 . 50 5. 50 20 .00 34.75 11 . 75 29.50 249 .95 179.95 8.50 20.40 26.00 72.50 8. 50 22.20 22.s5 127.50 49.90 153.70 91.30 19. 25 16. 30 22. 50 8.50 25 . 20 23 .90 12. 50 13. 75 8. 50 30 . 50 12. 20 18.65 10.35 4 .00 8.50 36.00 5.00 38.00 22.00 8.50 11. 75 8.50 44.75 30.75 15.16 8 . 50 111.25 85.00 19. 75 110.10 159 . 70 20.00 - I I I ~ Page 4 NAf'IE DATE LIST AMOUNT . . 6 D . $ Smith, Daniel 8- 21-69 7 . 30 Sniggen , John Allen 4- 13- 70 7 B 15. 00 Spears , Bill 11- 14-69 150 Amb . 34. 25 Spivey, Gerald W. 1- 11-69 5 c 64. 80 St ahl,. David 5- 29-69 142 Amb . 33. 33 Starker, r-:orris W. 2- 20-69 3 I 18 . 50 Steele, Claudia I 7- 7- 68 3 I 31 . 00 Stern, f"ir. . 12- 21-69 5 A 26. 25 Stone , Rodn~y 6- 24-69 3 I 8 . 50 Strdomski , Chester 7- 28- 68 3 I 45.05 Stricklin, Sadie 6- 4-69 128 Amb . 40. 00 Sullivan , Lorna J . .1- 21- 70 5 it 20. 25 . Sutton , J.onah 4- 21- 70 7 B 14. 50 Sverdloff, Ronald 1- 24-69 3 I 25.00 S\van, nobert E. . . 5- 5-70 7 13 s . 50 ~ Thomc:.s , Shane 3- 19- 70 7 B 8 . 50 Thomas , \lillard -6- 11- 69 4 B 30 .00 . Thompson , Donald 4- 19- 69 151 Amb . 30. 50 Thornbury , Robert 5- 25-69 117 Amb . 24. 66 Tilghman , \rlilliam 6- 19- 69 3 J 9. 25. Tinado , Sharon 9- 20- 69 140 Amb. 43. 00 Tomlinson , Gl ade 8-18-69 140 Amb . 23 . 25 Topham, Juliette 6- 14-69 3 J 8.50 Toppin , Alan 4- 4-69 142 Amb . 22. 50 V andermast , Margaret 10-18-69 3 J 17. 90 Vandermast, Robert 12-14- 68 4 B 8 . 80 Van Loon , John 4-17- 70 7 B 8 . 50 Vargas , Alfonso 11-13-67 1 282.00 Vargas, J acinto . 11- 28-66 171 553 . 59 Villegas, Belia ~ 3- 6- 70 6 D 1 . 25 Villeneuve , Richar d z. 7- 11-68 5 E 85. 90 Vogel , Loran 12-15-69 5 A 9. 00 , Volkoff , Paul 2-1-70 5 B 14. 75 \rlallace , Donald 4- 15- 70 6 D 28. 55 . - '\ti ay , James 1-23-70 5 A 8 . 50 \.felborn, Christine 10- 20- 68 3 J 23 . 35 \lest , Joel 9- 20- 69 3 J 17. 70 \rlheeler, David 11- 3- 69 3 K 22.60 '\rlhi te, James K. 6- 8-69 3 J 1 . 75 Williams, \r/illiam 5- 8-69 98- 3 58. 70 Wi lson, Robert s. 12- 29- 69 5 A 8 . 50 Woellert, Geor ge 12- 17- 68 4 J 19. 50 Zimmerman , David 6- 14- 69 3 J 20. 50 $13 ,884. 20 MISC. HEALTH CLINIC . l'TM"!E DATE LIST . AMOUNT Barcelona, Rudolph 2- 7-69 8 $ 8 . 0 Botelho , Mrs . Don 1- 31-66 4 6 . 0 Buckhadt , f"Irs . Carol 1- 11- 69 8 6 . 00 Claf5gett, r-Ir. s . rf. 6-20-69 . 8 3 . 00 Goss, Mrs . Frida 3- 18- 68 5 15. 00 Grij alva , Ralph 12- 16- 68 7 30. 00 1Iac:-er, Orville 5- 19- 69 8 5. 00 IIeredia , Salvadore 8- 14- 6'8 8 14. 00 Molitor, Paul I II 7- 7-64 . 4 5.00 !1yers , Clifford 9- 2-69 8 9.00 Neeley , Mrs . Betty 11- 7- 68 '8 5.00 Sholars, Constance 10-12-67 8 2 ,00 Wood , Nancy 2- 10-65 5 29 .00 $13?.oo , ~ .- Page 5 Board of Supervisors ) State of California ) SS County of Santa Barbara ) . / John E. Fabyanich being first duly S\1orn, deposes and s ays: That he is the Director of the Department of Resources & Collections and is the County Officer charged with the duty of collecting amo.unts due the County for hospitalization and medical care; that he has read the contents of the foregoing request ; tha~ the same is true except as to such matters which are stated therein on information or be.lief and as to such matter s ~hat he believes it to be true. Subscribed and Sworn to before me J . E. Lewis: County Clerk l:li!lll. ,___,:, ~. ~A Deputy Date ,'J,4-?,lz() Approved by t he Board of California, this of _Supervisors, Co.unty of Sant a Barbara, State .,/ "!. day of 0 c / o Bi?" IC , 1970 - ( . ~ . 1 \ Page 6 These accounts have been thorou(5hly researched and found uncollectible Charges below $20.00 are not listed as court costs make collection prohibitive. We are asking for release from collection of the following accounts for the listed reasons: Alva, Helen Baltramaitis, Clement Biesanz, f-1ichael Big\'1ood, David \.I . Blackwood , Ellen D. Burtsfield, Charles Campbell , Linda D. Canniff , Ralph A. Ambulance . No response , unable to locate , out of the area , last address Compton , Cal. :f\1an, \'Tife and 5 children. Alcoholic with very little income, spends more time unemployed than employed. Unable to collect . Home town was vlinona, Minn., moved left no address , cannot locate . . Transient from Greenfield , Mass. Cannot locate . Have been trying to collect since 1964, moved, left no address . ,. Accident case brought to trial, settled for less than full value . Judge .and court ,. find that it \'1ould be f air, just & equi table for all dept . to accept 2Cf/o of claims Cocktail waitress, sep . from husb .- left the area , unable to locate . . Chase , David L. Chavez, Francisco Address was a motor hotel,pt. was seaman, not in the area very long, unable to locate . Left the area, unable to locate. / Pt. with tourist card from Mexico, emp. I Clemens, Dannis Conelly, Paul J Davis , Gary Lee Doran, Lawrence Drtina, Bo Dunn, Frank Emery, Maurice Ferrel , Feye H. Figuer~a, Henry Fleming, Patrick Flores , f'1anuel Foust, Gerald Garcia, f'1elisio Garner, Fraly Garrepy, Richard Gaut , Ray Gilbert, Earl c. Hall , Hollis Hawkins , f'1ike Hernandez , Joan Hill ; Thomas Huffman, Burdette Jones, James Joslyn, Wilbur \ by Lemon Assoc.,gone back to Mexico, unable to locate. Amb .Pt . home address is Pennsylvaniaout of state, unable to collect~ Left the area, may have gone to \.lashington over a year ago. Amb. In the L. A. area somewhere, unable to locate. Roving gardener , out of the area, unable to locate. Alcoholic tree-trimmer, in and out of jailout of the area. Unable to locate, left the area over a year ago . Ft. is apparently on east coast; no leads to whereabouts, unable to locate. Amb. Out of the area , unable to collect . County Counsel agreed on settlement, to cancel balance. Out of the country-went back to home,Ireland upon release from Hospital. Unable to locate, out of the area Emancipated minor, unable to locate or collect. Gardener with 7 children, unable to collect . Out of the area, unable to locate. ' Unable to locate, in the San Francisco area. Bench warrant out for him-lower court fine being cancelled, unable to locate . Amb . Moved left no address . Chased him from L.A. to 5anDiego , cannot locate Another lemon picker, unable to locate. Amb . Out of state-east coast, unable to collect. , Amb. Pt.'s home address is Arkansas, unable to collect . Unable to collect thi s amount from San Antonio, Texas. Out of the area, around Bakersfield, unable to locate. Amb. Left the area, unable to locate I I I , Kellogg , William Kinnamon , Herbert Koch , Henry Ko\.,ralski , Stanley Kunkle , James . La.nders , \./illard Lee Chenoweth , Mary Lietzow , Rita LLamas , Alphonso Medland , Brian Miller, Ora Lee Moloney, Barbara Muller , Michael Myers , Melvin Mc Clellan , Allen !"le Clung , Jack Neel y , Charles Nevarez , Hermelo Nuno , Jose Oliver, Jesse Ollar , Loretta Papas, Ralph Pardo , Teddy Parish, Linda Peterson , \/allace Popa , Phyllis . Purkey , Donald Ramirez , Raymond Rasmussen , Lynn Ratcliff, Roberta Raymond, Neil . Regan, Philip Reid , Robert Righetti, Kyle Ritchie , \./illiam Roadruck , David Robinson , Clifford Rudd , Davette Ruti ve , Barbara Si ndoval, Emilio Schv1eibinz, Germaine Scott , M~s . Robert Seville , Miguel Shaefer , Brian Silva, Ray Simms, George E Slosson, Jud Spears, Bill Spivey, Gerald Stahl, David Steele , Claudia Stern, r"!I' . Stradomski, Chester Stri ckl i n, Sadie . ., I \ Page 7 Cannot locate , left the area Left the area , in Arizona some\rhere Can' t locate , haven ' t any clue to whereabouts . Lemon- picker who has left the area. Cannot locate , out of Santa Barbara ~ea . Last knovm to be in the L. A. Area~ can ' t locate . Bill 2 yrs . old , moved , no way to 1 cate . Amb . In L.A. area, unable to locate Amb . Out of the area, unable to locate . Amb . Moved , left no address . Amb .In the L.A. area , unable to locate . Address \.,ras area where people move in and out almost daily- moved , can ' t locate . Unable to locate , billed for 6 mos . . r Amb . In prison , 1-5 yrs . Amb . Address was Fort Ord. Discharged. Unable to locate ,. f'1oved, left no address , was out of area previously. In Rolling Hills area, unable to locate . Have been trying to collect since 11- 63. Subj. has gone back to Mexico , unable .to locate Deported to Mexico . Can ' t locate , address unknown. Amb . Out of the area, can ' t locate . Amb . Unable to locate , out of the area. Have tried to collect for over 2 yrs. .Amt. isn' t vJorth further pu.rsuing. Subj . entered for attempted suicide . Now has permanent brain damage , medically . indigent . Deceased 4- 70. No estate Amb . Out of the area , can ' t locate . Unable to locate , in the L. A. Area. Moved , unable to contact . Can ' t lee.ate, unable to collect . Moved , left no address . No clues to locate. Original address was Minn . \.las currently residing in S. B. Moved , left no address 43 yrs . male with alcoholic prob . moved, left no address. Unable to locate, moved , left no address . Mail returned, left no f orwarding. Unabl e to locate , left the area. Lost at sea , presumably drowned. Amb . Out of the area , unable to collect . Amb . In the L. A. area , unable to locate . Amb .Address in Huntington Beach. Addressee unkno\'ln. Gardener , left the area. Amb. Out of the area , unable to locate. Moved, left no address. Can ' t locate , transient orchard \1orker. Subj . on the east coast , unable to locate . 1 Have been trying to locate and collect since 1963. Unable to collect , no resources. Mentally unstable, constantly in and out of jail. Amb . Out of the area, unable to collect. Amb. Mail returned, unable to locate. Mail returned, addressee unkno\vn. Amb. Fort Ord address. Left the service, unabl e to locate . Mai l returned , unable to locate. Somewhere in midwest , unable to locate. Unable to locate , in Flor ida area. Amb . Medic all i ndigent, on \./elf are . I I ' j t t , ' . - Sverdldff, Ronald Thomas , Willard Thompson, Donald Thornbury , Robert Tinado , Sharon Tomlinson , Glade Toppi n , Alan Vargas , Alfonso Vargas , Jacinto Vi lleneuve , Richard \./allace , Donald Wel born , Chri st i ne \-/heeler, Davi d \.li lli ams , william Grijalva, Ralph Wood, Nancy - ' ' Page 8 Out of the country , lives in England. Unabl e to collect , out of the area. Amb . Can ' t locate . Not in the area. Amb . Mail returned , addressee unkno\'m , out of the state . Amb . Moved , left no address . Amb . Out of the area , unable to coll ect . ~b . Original address \'Tas Fort Ord. Left the service , unable to locate .Medically indigent , on \./elf are . Have been trying to collect since 1966. - Husband can ' t be found and wife is on Welfare. On \./elf are , can ' t collect . .Musician and writer , unable to locate . Unable to locate , out of the country. Mail returned , unabl e to l ocate . Unabl e to l ocate , not in the area . ,. - - I , \ ' Mentally incompetant- unable to Charged in error, subj . was on at t he time . . . , ' ! . ' . -- ' I collect . \./elf are ' aMi 112 October 5, 1970 by the County ~nd the Clerk be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to record said instrument in the office of the Santa Barbara County Recorder. Recommendation In the Matter of Recommendation of Administrative Officer fo~ Acceptance for Acceptance of Draft fo~ . , -~ of Draft for $378.00 for Energizing Street Lights, Tract #10,955, U~~t . 1, county Energizing. Street Lights, Service Area No. 3. Tract #10,955, Unit 2, County Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and Service Area 3 / carried unanimously, it is ordered that the recommendation of the Administrative Fixing Tax Bond for Tract #11,004 I I Release of Wal Bond for Tract #10,699, Unit 1 I Placement of Wall " Fence " Landscaping Officer for the acceptance of a draft in the amount of $378.00 for energizing street lights, Tract #10,955, Unit 2, County Service Area No. 3, be, and the same is hereby, confirmed; and the Clerk be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to deposit said draft to the credit of County Service Area No. 3. In the Matter of Fixing Tax Bond for Tract #11,004, in the Amount of $4,112.50. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the tax bond for Tract #11 ,004 be, and the same is hereby, fixed in the amount of $4,112.50. It is further ordered that the action of the Board at its meeting of September 29, 1969, initially fixing the tax bond be, and the same is hereby rescinded . In the Matter of Planning Director's reconnnendation for Release of Wall Bond for Tract #10,699, Unit 1, in the Amount of $4,620.00. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the following wall bond for Tract #10,699, Unit 1, be, and the same is hereby, released as to all future acts and conditions: American Motorists Insurance Company - Goleta Valley Development Company, Principal, in the amount of $4,620.00, Bond No. 8SM 159 364, dated October 4, 1968. In the Matter of Recommendation of Planning Director for Placement of a combination Wall and Fence and a Landscaping Bond along the rear of those lots ad- Bond for rear lots adjacent Cathedral Oaks Rd. & Fairview Ave . o jacent to Cathedral Oaks Road and Fairview Avenue. Tract 10, 699, Unit 3 Tr 10 , 99 , Uni 3 I Release of Wal Bond for Tract 110,913, Unit I Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the reconnnendation of the Planning Director for the placement of a bond for a combination wall and fence and including landscaping in the amount of $18,400.00 for those lots adjacent to Cathedral Oaks Road and Fairview Avenue be, and the same is hereby, confirmed. In the Matter of Planning Director's recommendation for Release of Wall Bond for Tract #10,913, Unit 1, in the amount of $1,155.00. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the following wall bond for Tract 1110, 913, Unit 1, be, and the same is hereby, released as to all future acts and conditions: Pacific Employers Insurance Company - Luria Development No. as Principal, in the amount of $1,155.00, Bond No. M 138,573, dated May 22, 1969. Placement of In the Matter of Recommendation of County Landscape Architect for Placement landscaping, Sprinkler Syst mof laudsC81?irig, Sprinkler System and Wall Bond, in the Amount of $3,5qO.OO, LCR " Wall Bond, LCR Company / omm. Parking ot (70-CP-52) - Waiver of Physical Requirements / Waiver of Physical Requirements // Claims Against the County Release of Oil Drilling Bonds / I October 5, 1970 Company Commercial Parking Lot, (70-CP-52). Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that a bond, in the amount of $3,500.00 be placed to secure performance of the landscaping, sprinkler system and required walls, as recommended by the County Landscape Architect as well as a cash deposit of $165.00 for the maintenance of eleven (11) street trees. The bond should contain wording similar to the following: . "In consideration of approval by the County Planning Commission of a precise plan for pevelopment, Case No. (70-CP-52) at 6509 El Colegio Road, Isla Vista, also known as Assessor's Parcel No. 75-041-12, Mr. Louis J. Carnesale hereby agrees to install landscaping, the sprinkler system and the required walls within one year of the date of issuance of the zoning clearance for the parking lot plan. And in accordance with the approved landscaping plan dated September 24, 1970, on file with the County Landscape Architect.'' In the Matter of Approving Request for Waiver of Physical Requirements for Prospective Employee, Santa Barbara General Hospital. :113 Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the req~est for a waiver of the physical requirements for the following prospective employee be, and the same is hereby approved, as recommended by Dr. David Caldwell: Patti J. Coffman, Staff Nurse. In the Matter of Approving Request for Waiver of Physical Requirements for Prospective Employee, Sheriff's Department. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the request for a waiver of the physical requirements for the following prospective employee be, and the same is hereby approved, as recommended by Dr. David Caldwell: Mrs. Lorine S. Trumbull, Intermediate Clerk In the Matter of Clajms Against the County filed by Individuals and/or Attorneys on Behalf of Clients for Alleged Damages. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the following claims against the County for alleged damages be, and the same are hereby, referred to the County Counsel for rereferral to the County's Insurance Carrier: Robert L. Monk for Alberta Morgan - $118,800.00. J. P. Derbyshire $19.00. In the Matter of Release of Oil Drilling Bonds. Pursuant to the request of the County Petroleum Engineer and in accordance with the provisions contained in Ordinance No. 1927: Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the following oil drilling bonds be, and the same are hereby, released as to all future acts and conditions: Publication of Ordinances Noa 2116 and 2117 I Reports and Communications ' Planning Cormt. Reports for Info. Only / Quitclaim Deed for I.V. Sanitary Dist. Parcel 1.1, in exchange for Easement Deed from County fo Construction ic Maintenance of Sanitary Sewer I I October 5, 1970 / Frank Goldman - Maryland Casualty Company, Bond No . 94-073104, covering ''The Goldman wells on the Los Flores Lease in the Four Deer Area'' 1 Standard Oil Company - Pacific Indemnity Company, Bond No. 119594, covering well ''Tognazzini 1F3A, '' In the Matter of Publication of Ordinances Nos. 2116 and 2117. It appearing from the Affidavits of Publication of the Principal Clerk of the Santa Barbara News-Press that Ordinances Nos. 2116 and 2117 have been published in the manner and form required by law; Upon motion, duly seconded and carried unanimously, it is determined that said Ordinances Nos . 2116 and 2117 have been published in the manner and form required by law . In the Matter of Reports and Con:munications . The following Reports and Communications were received by the Board and ordered placed on file: / l) Annual Financial Report of Santa Barbara County, FY 1969-70, County Auditor=Controller. / 2) Solvang Municipal Improvement District Resolution No. 259 Declaring Result of General District Election Held on September 8, 1970. 13) LAFCO Resolutions No . 212 approving annexation of Conni~. Way Properties to City of Santa Barbara; No. 214 approving annexation of 4) I ; Tract 10,699, Unit 3 to Goleta Sanitary District; No. 215 approving annexation of Tract 10,699: Unit 3 to Goleta Valley Mosquito Abatement District; No . 216 approving annexation of Atlantic / Richfield Co. Property to Carpinteria Sanitary District; and No. 1 217 approving annexation of Assembly of God Property to Goleta Sanitary District . PUC - Notice of Temporary Removal from Calendar of Application of Golden West Airlines, Inc., for certificate to provide passenger air carrier service to and from Santa Maria Airport; and Petition for Modification of Decisions 77323 and 77612 Re Golden West Airlines carrying of passengers between certain airports / 5) Assembly Transportation Committee Hearing Notice, October 20, 1970, at 10 a . m., State Building, San Francisco, Re development of high=speed ground transportation systems in California. In the Matter of Planning Commission Reports for Information Only. The following reports were received for information only and ordered placed on file: / 1) Denied request of Albert J. Baron on behalf of Royal Irish Kennels (70-CP-53) for Conditional Use Permit to allow establishment and operation of commercial kennel for breeding of dogs at 1594 Lillie Avenue, S11unnerland. In the Matter of Acceptance of Quitclaim Deed by the County from Isla Vista Sanitary District, Parcel 1.1, for Portion of Easement no Longer Required by District, in Exchange for Executed Easement Deed from County (both without monetary consideration) for Construction and Maintenance of Sanitary Sewer. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that a Quitclaim Deed, dated September 14, 1970, from the Isla Vista Sanitary District, a public corporation, Parcel 1.1, Sanitary Sewer, Folio, No. 571, for portion of easement no longer required by the District, in exchange for executed Easement Deed from the County (both without monetary consideration) for construction and maintenance of sanitary sewer be, and the same is hereby, accepted by the County. In the Matter of Recommendation of Planning Commission for Approval on Request of Richard T. Passmore (70-V-52) for Renewal of Conditional Exception to ' Approval on Req. of Richard T. Passmore for Renewal of Cond. Exception to Permit S~rage & Sale o Wood at 1415 115 October 5, 1970 Permit Storage and Sale of Wood at 1415 Solomon Road, Orcutt, Fifth Supervirorial District . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and - Solomon Rd., Ore tt carried unanimously, it is ordered that the reconnnendation of the Planning Connnission -- I for approval of the request of Richard T. Passmore (70-V-52) for Renewal of Conditional Exception under Article X, Section 4 and the 10-R-l District Classification of Ordinance No. 661 to permit the storage and sale of wood, westerly portion of Parcel No . 111-250-48, located on the north side of Solomon Road, approximately 1/2 mile west of Blosser Road, and known as 1415 Solomon Road, Orcutt, California, be, and the same is hereby, confirmed as an interim use of the land subject to the following conditions: 1) This Permit shall expire two (2) years from and after the date of issue. 2) The County of Santa Barbara retains the right to terminate the use with ninety (90) days notice. 3) No signs shall be permitted. Req. for Rezonin In the Matter of Requests from Santa Barbara Audubon Society and American to 100 AG or AL land now zoned Society ef Landscape Architects, Santa Barbara Section, for Rezoning to 100 AG ''U'' from Western Boundary of Em.barcad ro or AL the land now zoned ''U'' from the Western Boandary pf Embarcadero Subdivision Subdivision to Gaviota from Ocean t to Gaviota from the Ocean to the Boundary of Los Padres National Forest. the Boundary of Los Padres National~ore t Conmunications from subject organizations were read by the Clerk. I I I Mr. Herman Farnum, representing Goleta Farm Bureau, appeared and stated that he felt the request is out of order, objected to persons other than landowners in the area attempting to dictate the zoning and explained that he had purchased the Las Varas Canyon property in 1960 because of the 10- acre zoning in order to be able to pass the property on to his children and grandchildren. He pointed out that there was very little demand on the part of the present landowners for County services. Mr. Ray Martin Engineer connected with the El Capitan development, appeared and explained that he felt the requests were aimed at that development. He questioned the reference in the letter from the American Society of Landscape Architects to the hazards of the Bentonite clay zones and suggested that if it is hazardous to future subdivision development, it is accordingly so for agriculture because of the amount of water the latter operation introduces to the soil. Supervisor Clyde suggested that these arguments should be directed to a hearing on rezoning of the land. Supervisor Grant stated that he was unable to understand why single areas of the County should be singled out for rezoning. Upon motion of Superviso'r Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried, it is ordered that the above-entitled request be, and the same is ereby, denied and the connnunications be placed on file. Supervisor Clyde voted ''No'' on this motion. Req. for Considerati n In the Matter of Request of Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee for of Nov. 30, 1970 Deadline for Consideration of Proposed Deadline of November 30, 1970, for Filing and Receiving Filing and - Receiving Applic tia:ni Applications for Agricultural Preserves for Tax Lien Year beginning March 1, 1971. for Agricultural Preserves for Tax Li n (Cont'd) Year beginning March 1, 1971 Mr. George Goodall of the Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee, appeared J to state that the County still prefers a November 30th deadline. -- Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the filing deadline for applications for . - . - 1.:16 Progress Repo on Narcotics Drug Abuse in the Community I Req. for Joint Powers Agreement to Finance Terminal Bldg at Municipal Airport / October 5, 1970 Agricultural Preserves for Tax Lien Year beginning March 1, 1971, be, and the same is hereby, established as December 31, 1970. In the Matter of Progress Report of Ad Hoc Committee on Narcotics and Drug Abuse in the Community. (Cont'd) Mr. ~o~enzo Dall'Armi, County Superintendent of Schools, appeared and gave . a report on the Committee's activities to date as well as .some conclusions and recommendations . The Committee has met six times and expects soon to be able to recommend an action program. They have discovered that not enough teachers have a thorough knowledge of the problem. Training seminars funded by the Federal Government will fill this need, counsellor confidentiality is essential, and effective instructional materials are acarce. Scare tactics in film materials ''turns the kids off". The use of religious leaders is effective but may be subject to future criticism due to constitutional guarantees relative to operation of Church and State. The use of ''ex-heads'' in the program is limited and not the complete answer to communicating with the younger generation. The Ad Hoc Committee feels that funding is needed to move from the organizational to the action phase . Staff is necessary to pull the total effort together . The schools will independently pursue their efforts but other organizations need to be included in the total effort. The Comwill bring forth recommendations within approximately two weeks for organization and staff, he stated. To Mr. Callahan's inquiry concerning possible source of Federal funds, Mr. Dall'Armi indicated that this is possible through HEW, but that hiring a paid director to explore further availability and prepare grant applications was necessary. He also explained that youngsters need to be exposed to the problems and dangers j before Junior High School - elementary grade youngsters need to be educated. Program instructional materials are needed to point out to youngsters what they will be exposed to in future years . He expressed appreciation to the District Attorney for providing available information and help to school counselors Mrs. Irma Saunders, representing the Tax Action Commission, appeared to question if parental permission should be obtained before giving instructional material to children. She was advised that it should be. Upon motion of Supervisor Callahan, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Narcotics and Drug Abuse, dated October 4, 1970, be, and the same is hereby, accepted for filing and referred to the County Counsel and Administrative Officer for report and recommendation by October 19, 1970. In the Matter of Request of City of Santa Barbara for Joint Powers Agreement to Finance Terminal Build1ng at Municipal Airport. Mr. C. G. Petrie, City Administrator of Santa Barbara, appeared to explain the program of development and the plan for funding improvement at the Santa Barbara Airport, pointing out that the City's advisors have recommended a joint powers authority as the best means of financing the proposed facility, which they expect could be completed within eighteen (18) months with the expectation that work will be under way next spring. He filed a copy of the development plan for the Santa - Report on Complaint for Violation of Ordinance No. 453, Montecito Area, from Russell A. Gougeon * Dr. *Mrs. Peter Sen on the Quirin Proper 760 Ashley Rd, Monte I Ratification * approval of Certain Travel Requests I ersonnel Management Information System (Bi-Weekly Payroll System) I 117 ' - , ~ ' October 5 , 1970 Barbara Municipal Airport prepared by William L. Pereira Associates and the Final Report of Economic Analysis of Santa Barbara Airport prepared by Development Research Associates, and agreed to comply with Supervisor Callahan's request that each Board member receive copies of this material. Councilman Franklin Lowance appeared and stated that revenue bonds would be entirely financed by income from the airport users. Col. Richard Temple (Ret'd), Santa Barbara County Taxpayers' Association, - appeared and recommended an alternate financing route by submitting the basic plan to the voters for approval, expressing concern about the trend in the use of the joint powers vehicle as being unwise. They prefer a bond election and recommend t hat the County not become part of a joint powers ag~eement . He suggested that perhaps the County should consider operating the airport since it is in fact regional . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervi sor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the above- entitled reports be, and the same are hereby, accepted for filing, and the proposal for the joint powers agreement be, the same is hereby, referred to the Administrative Officer and County Counsel for report and recommendation by Monday, October 19, 1970. In the Matter of Report from County Counsel from Board Referral on Complaint for Violation of Ordinance No . 453, Montecito Area, from Russell A. Gougeon and Dr . and Mrs . Peter Senn, on the Quirin Property, 760 Ashley Road, Monteci to . (Cont'd) y, Attorney Stanley C. Hatch, representing complaining neighbors, appeared ite to state their continued concern that the Quirins understand the meaning of the t erm ''guests'' . The neighbors would object to the use of the Quirin property to any extent that would resemble a commercial enterprise or a ''commune''. Supervisor Grant expressed his concern for a continued watch on the matter. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unenimously, it is ordered that the October 2, 1970 report of the County zoning refer- ral on the Quirin Property, 760 Ashley Road, Hontecito, be,and the same is hereby, accepted for filing . In the Matter of Recommendation of Administrative Officer for Ratification and approval of Certain Travel Requests. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carr i ed unanimously, it is ordered that the travel request of Judge Floyd c. Dodson of the Superior Court to attend a meeting of Presiding Judges in San Francisco on October 2, 1970, be, and the same is hereby, ratified, and the request of Judge Richard C~ Kirkpatrick of Santa Maria Munici pal Court to attend the Annual Municipal and Justi ce Court Judges Institute on October 29, 1970, in San Diego, be, and the same is hereby, approved. In the Matter of Report on Administrative officer onPersonnel Management Information System (Bi-Weekly Payroll System) . (Cont'd) Paul Floyd, Asst . Adminis t rative Officer, appeared and briefed the Board on the background of the plan and reasons for recommending the change . The present payroll system is based upon a negative report concept which is c11mbersome, difficult to administer and control, and does not utilize the capabilities of the County's computer. Of fifteen (15) counties surveyed, twelve (12) are paying bi-weekly, one - 118 Req . for Salar aud Fringe Benefits for Fiscal Yr. 197 - 1971 I October 5, 1970 (1) semi-monthly and two (2) monthly. Most of the local larger firms pay bi-weekly and the trend is to bi-weekly systems. He presented the charts and explained the proposal by reference thereto. By using a time card the employee himself will have the responsibility for the accuracy of the time reported as having worked. The employee's earning and leave statement will be an important by-product of the plan that will inform the employee of accrued sick leave, overtime and vacation time. He made the following three (3) recommendations: 1) The Board adopt the bi-weekly concept of payro~l pfocessing and payment, and that the conversion date for the new bi-weekly system be established as February 1, 1971; 2) The Board designate Security Pacific National Bank as the designated bank for the Payroll Bank Deposit Plan and order the Administrative Officer and County Counsel to draw an agreement with Security Pacific National Bank, specifying the terms and conditions of the plan for your Board's approval; 3) The Board direct the Administrative Officer, Auditor-Controller, Personnel Director and all department heads to work toward a method of time reporting for the bi-weekly system, which will minimize the hold-back period. County Auditor-Controller A. E. Eaves appeared and concurred with the plan as outlined but requested that adequate lead-time be provided. Personnel Director Wilbur S. Wagstaff spoke in favor of the plan. Mr. Zack Stringer, Manager, Santa Barbara County Employees Association, appeared to express appreciation for postponement of the conversion date and stated that the Association felt that the advantages out-weighed the disadvantages in the new system. Mr. Leonard E. Roders, President, Santa Barbara Chapter, Social Services Union, Local 535, AFL-CIO, appeared and expressed agreement with the conversion date. Sgt. John Kea!.rns of the Sheriff's Benefit and Relief Association appeared to state that they will work with the Administrative Officer and staff to implement the plan. Col. Richard Temple (Ret'd), Santa Barbara County Taxpayers Association, appeared to state that his Association endorsed the plan . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the three (3) above-entitled recommendations of the Administrative Officer be, and they are hereby, approved In the Matter of Request of Santa Barbara Chapter, Social Works Union, Local 535, AFL-CIO for Salary and Fringe Benefits for Fiscal Year 1970-71. Mr. Leonard E. Roders, President, Santa Barbara Chapter, Social Service Union, Local 535, AFL-CIO, appeared and read the cover statement of subject proposal and filed same . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the request of the Santa Barbara Chapter, Social Works Union, Local 535, AFL-CIO for salary and fringe benefits for fiscal year 1970-71 be, and the same is hereby, referred to the Administrative Officer and Personnel Director. 119 October 5, 1970 I Application for In the Matter of Application of Standard Gas Company for Franchise to Franchise to Install Maintain ~ Operate Install, Maintain and Operate an 8-inch Pipeline to Transport Waste Water obtained an 8-inch Pipeli e to Transpert through Oil Production from Gathering Site to Treatment Plant, Santa Maria Area. Waste Water obtained through Oil Mr. W. F. Brady, Standard Oil Company, Land Department, appeared to ex- Production from Gatherine Site to plain above-entitled request. Treatment Plant, Santa Maria Supervisor Grant and Callahan wondered if the Planning and Health Department I might be concerned with the request. Supervisor Tunnell pointed out that these Approval of Final Map, Tract #11,184, Lecated West of Cambridge Dr. ~ Sout of Cathedral Oaks Subdivisien / Salaries I lines are a necessary adjunct of any oil production area in order to transport salt water out of the area and prevent it from percolating into the ground. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried, it is ordered that subject request be, and the same is hereby, referred to the Petroleum Eningeer, Road Department and County Counsel for study and report on Monday, October 19, 1970. Supervisor Clyde voted ''No'' on this motion because he felt that the Planning and Health Departments should be included in the referral as they are concerned and should be consulted. In the Matter of Recommendation of Asst. County Silrveyor for Approval of Final Map, Tract #11,184, Located West of Cambridge Drive and South of Cathedral Oaks Subdivision, Third Supervisorial District. The Clerk reported receipt of a Stipulation from United Pacific Insurance Company, effective October 2, 1970, relative to designation of Tract #10,933 as Tract #ll,l84, and that all its bonds previously filed and referring to Tract #10,933 ' would apply to Tract #11,184 . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carr ied unanimously, it is ordered that the recommendation of t he Asst . County Surveyor for approval of the final map of Tract #11,184 located west of Cambridge Drive and south of Cathedral Oaks Subdivision, Third Supervisorial District be, and the same is hereby, confirmed; the map having been found to be technically correct, conforms to the approved tentative map or any approved alterations thereof and complies with all applicable laws and regulations; also, written notice has been received from the Land Development Coordinator t hat all affected departments and agencies have certified that t heir requirements have been satisfied and t hat all bonds, cash deposits or instruments of credit have been received by the County Clerk . The County Surveyor's Certificate has been executed on the original t raci ngs , as provided in Section 11593 of the California Business and Profess ions Code. It is further ordered that the Chairman be, and he is hereby, authorized to sign subject Stipulation relative to bond changes. In the Matter of Allowance of Positions, Disallowance of Positions , and Fixing of Compensation for Monthly Salaried Positions. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO . 70-621A (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) Upon motion, the Board recessed until 2 ;00 o'clock . p. m. At 2:00 o'clock, p . m., the Board reconvened. Present: Supervisors George H. Clyde , Joe J. Callahan, Daniel G. Grant, F r a n c js H, Beatti e., a nd C11 r tis T11nnell ; and J. E . I,ewis , ClQ:clrt . Supervisor Clyde in the Chair. 1.ZO Terminatien. of County's Milk Inspectio Program ic Change in Inspection Procedure I Centinued Hear Approval of Req. for Rezoning f proposed D.A. Silva (70-RZ-6 Agricultural Preserve Land I D.A. Silva Ag. Preserve Ordinance I October 5 , 1970 In the Matter of Recommendation of Administrative Officer for Termination .of County's Milk Inspection Program and Recommendation of Santa Maria Valley Dairyman's Association for Change in Inspection Procedure . Mr. Arthur Tognazzini of the Santa Maria Valley Dairmen's Association appeared to s tate that the dairymen will under the proposal pay the entire cost of inspection to the State. Mr . James Hobson of t he same Association appeared in reference to subject matter. Dr . Joseph T. Nardo, County Health Officer, appeared and briefed the Board on t he background of the proposal, stating t hat the cost of services have increased without corresponding increases in fees which presently are about 25% compensable in the number of plants and dairys have dwindled. San Luis Obispo County having experienced t he same difficulty has relinquished the milk inspection service to the State . Mr. R. L. Van Buren, Chief, Bureau of Da~ry Services, State Dept. of Agriculture, appeared and explained the procedure for producers, processor s, and dis t r ibutors to petition the State to provide the serwice; twenty-eight (28) counties presently have done this. Mr. Hobson pointed out that the producers are concerned with the maintenance of laboratory faci l ities in t heir present form. Dr. Nardo estimated that it would cost approximately $3,000.00 to keep the laboratory going and that this woul d amount to a County subsidy. In response to a question from Supervisor Callahan, Dr . Nardo acknowledged that the transfer of the inspection service to the State woul d make possible some reduction in staff. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the County of Santa Barbara petition the State Director of Agriculture to assume the milk inspection service of the County but that the County continue to provide laboratory fees for the nominal change of $1.00 per month, and the amount of specimems be limited to one hundred (100) per month with the excess over this amount to be prorated in cost, and the effective date of the State's assumption of the milk inspection service be February 1, 1971. ng en Preserve ) Proposed In the Matter of Continued Hearing on Planning Commission and Agricultural Advisory Committee Recommendations for Approval of Request for Rezoning of Antonio . D~ Silva (70-RZ-61) Agricul tural Preserve Land. This being the date and time set for the continued hearing on subject proposal, and there being no appearances or wr itten statements submitted for or against subject proposal; Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carr ied unanimous ly , it is ordered that the r ecommendation of the Planning Commjssion and the Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee to adopt an ordinance amending Article IV of Ordinance No. 661, as amended, for an agricultural preserve, on the basis that it conforms to the General Plan of the County be, and the same is hereby, Antonio confirmed for Da Silva (70-RZ-61) to rezone from ''U'' to 40-AG . I t is further ordered that the Board passed and adopted the following ordinance: In the Matter of Ordinance No. 2122 - An Ordinance of the County of Santa Barbara, As Amended, by adding Section 653 to Article IV of l Hearing on Recommend fer Creatien ef Ag. Preserve, Guadalupe Area for D.A. Silva ( reatien of the D.A. ilva Ag. Preserve n the Guadalupe Are I xecutiea ef Land onservation Coatract er Appreved Ag. Pres et. S. B. Ceunty - .A. Silva (70-AP-34) / entiaued Heariag ea ppeal of Dr. Eugene iches from Cond. esed ea Plaaaing ean. Appreval ef velepment Plan 70-M-88) fer Off ice ldg., Goleta / tiens October 5, 1970 Said Ordinance. Upon the roll being called, the following Supervisors voted Aye, to-wit: George H. Clyde, Joe J. Callahan, Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell. NOES: None ABSENT: None In the Matter of Hearing on Planning Commission and Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee Recommendations for Creation of Agricultural Preserve, Guadalupe Antonio Area for ~ . Da Silva (70- AP - 34). This being the date and time set for subject hear ing; the Affidavit of Publication being on file with the Clerk; and there being no appearances or written statements submitted for or against subject proposal . . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the recommendations of the Planning Commission 121 and Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee to approve the application of ~nto.nio DaSilva (70-AP-34) to create an Agricultural Preserve under the provisions of Chapter 1443, Statutes of 1965, known as the California Land Conservation Act be, and the same is hereby confirmed, from a land use standpoint, on the basis that it conforms to the criteria established by the Board of Supervisors of Santa Barbara County. It is further ordered that the following resolution be passed and adopted: Antonio - In the Matter of Creation of the ~ . Da Silva Agricultural Preserve in the Guadalupe Area, Fifth Supervisorial District. RESOLIITION NO . 70-622 {ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Execution of Land Conservation Contracts for Approved Antonio ~ricultural Preserve, between the County of Santa Barbara and . Da Silva {70-AP-34) . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted, authorizing the Chairman and Clerk to execute subject contract for an agricultural preserve beAntonio tween the County of Santa Barbara and L Da Silva (70-AP-34): RESOLIITION NO. 70-623 (ORIGINAL IN ~ERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Continued Hearing on Appeal of Dr. Eugene Aiches from Conditions Imposed on Planning Commission Approval of Development Plan {70-M-88) for Office Building, Goleta. This being the date and time set for' bhe continued hearing on subject proposal; Supervisor Grant reported that the applicant had requested a one week's continuance . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell , and carried unanimously , it is ordered that subject hearing be, and the same is hereby, continued to 2:00 o'clock, p . m. , Tuesday, October 13, 1970. 1.22 Req. fer Apprepriatiea, Caacellatiea e Reviaiea ef Funds ' Allewaace ef Clajs / Appeal ef Walter F. Schw en req. ef G. Schuirman. and Asseciates fer Cenditioaal Exception. to Allew Special Care Heme fer Mentally Retarded Weaea ak October 5, 1970 In the Matter of Requests for Appropriation, Cancellation or Revision of Funds. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, the following requests for appropriation, cancellation or revision of funds .are hereby approved, in the budget classifications and amounts shown, and the Auditor be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to make the necessary transfers : l 'l I Public Works - General Fund - Transfer from 35 B 19 Small Tools ~ Instruments To: 35 C 1 Equipment $35. 00 Sheriff - Detention - General Fund-Transfer from: Appropriation for Contingencies, $6,000 To : 102 B 21 Support and Care of Persons $6,000.00 S.B. General Hospital - General Fund-Transfer from 159 C 1 $150.00 To : I 159 C 1, $150.00 Board of Supervisors -General Fund- Transfer From: 1 c 1 $44.10. 1 B 14 $44.10 To : Super ior Court - General Fund - Tr ansfer From: 75 B- 14 Office Supplies $385.00 To: 75- B- 17 - Rents ~ Leases $385.00 . - Petroleum - Petroleum Fund - ' . . Transfer From: 12 - Contingency $3,500.00 To: 124-B-19 - $500.00 124-B- 20 1,526.00 124- C- l 124- B- 22 1,200. 00 274.00 In the Matter of Allowance of Claims. Upon motion, duly seconded, and carried unanimous l y, it is order ed that the following c l aims be, and the same are hereby allowed , each claim for the amount and payable out of the funds designated on the face of each claim, respectively, to-wit: CLAIMS LIST ' I lL, (SEE CLAIMS LIST ON PAGE 123) Upon t he roll being called, the following Supervisors voted Aye, to-wit : George H. Clyde, Joe J . Callahan, Daniel G. Grant, Fr ancis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell NOES: None ABSENT: NONE I In the Matter of Hearing on Appeal of Walter F . Schwank from Planning Commission Approval on Request of J. Robert Andrews on behalf of G. Schuirman and Associates (70- CP - 48) for Conditional Use Permit and Recommendation for Conditional Exception to Allow Special care Home for Eight (8) Mentally Retarded Women instead of Five (5) . This being the date and time of the public hearing on t he above- captioned appeal, and t he Affidavit 0 Publication being on file, t he Clerk by reference to a l isting read t he names of organizations and individuals from whom letters were received favoring opposing t he appeal . Some of the letters were read in t heir entirety and ot hers summarized. The Clerk then read t he Zoning Report dated September 30 , 1970 giving general information, arguments in favor and arguments in opposition to the proposed Conditional Use Permit. , . l ( "',; . Her bert H. Divelbiss, Planning Director, pointed out the location of signers :123 October 5, 1970 f . . . , ' ' I NUMBER 1740 "" 170 ., ., ., ,., ., .,. ., .,. ,. ., , ., ., ,. .,., .,. .,. ., 8711 ,. 9771 ,., m . .,.,. .,. . . AC-1!57 AUDITOR'S W. AR" RANT REGISTER SANT A BARBARA COUNTY J ", I . ~~~ ~-----'-' -'-'DATE----'-___---'---'---1--='-----ll_JO---'- PAYEE .nl . ,. liM . . tlllll a.na.u ~ ,, ~ . . . . ~~ . lll.lllit uw. , - .UL . n' l ~ ~ . . .i ftla PURPOSE ~,., . ( --- U.lit ~ . ~ atd . . . . . , ' SYMBOL l " , , . lU a J, aau . Sa II aa . 1111 Ua)J IA a II ie u Dt D81t . Uau . WARRANT ALLOWED FOR , u . u.11 , U.ll 41.11 n , . 11.M 1 . 111 " " n.as ,. . n.n ,. . . .'.". . lM . u . . 11 . .,.u IU.11 II.ts J . . a.IO 2.1 1 . \ REMARKS , . . NUMBER ., ' 111 .,. ., , , ., ., . - . -, - Ille 9111 . 1117 AC-1 !57 { I AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER I SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ( FUND___;_ .:;.__,;__: ____. _ _ _. __~ DATE ' ''' PAYEE PURPOSE u., . hlllftr AGlftC. ._. ._._ ,_ . Hdft----- Ce't.1-c.w -~MW--.U. llldlla i .a a1CieJ&'9 ll Gl.lltie . au e a Cleli - . _ - UI. a ~.-. . ees1.1 . _ . Git ,._ . ~ ~~ ~ . ., . . . ,. ' .,._.ea, SYMBOL D 17 a II ' . .a, , l , 71 UC , ,. Ma 'M8 UC ,. ., n aw ,. u. I 1. D,. WARRANT ALLOWED FOR 11. us.u . . 2 m.u UT.II i.-. 1.111.17 ., . u. UM u . . r. ,_ . . . . . , . "" 7.JA . ,. U.11 9.21 J.t. 8 I II.ft , . u on . -.-as . - nae . * Na 11 111 a I lU 8 ll ) u . n. , . . ~ ., . REMARKS N UMBER -. 1111 -., - 9111 . . . . . - . ., . ., - - ' AUDITOR'S W:ARRANT REGISTER SANTA BARBARA COUNTY , FUND ._. PAYEE PURPOSE 4'11111 . C. . u.r Olill w~ . ws. . uw , . . .-i -.i .i a., _ . . ~ ~ ~ ,.i ~---- .uu . . . , . ce11r-. . calit . lllllal .w -J,a .i hdfte u. Cla&lf . .i . . au.a. Cl-* ~ ---~ Jat-lr -- - . - fft Cllale ~ 'i'l: . , DATE--'-----'---'----'-S~- -'~-J.97~tA0 SYMBOL lOI 81 lUab lMaU U78U 1., a II 110 a I llt . Uta at 111 . uen 111 a I u1au J.1t lMaS lMH WARRANT ALLOWED FOR n1.11 . u . . , 1. U7.IO u.u . n.11 , . .,. . . ,. ,.,. a.SI ff.fl 11.R . u U17 '. . u.n u.11 a.u , , . . Lle . . REMARKS -- N U MBER ., . - - , - -. , ,. ,. " ,", .,. - . -- ., - Mil . .- - -. . - - AC I !57 I - . ' . . . . . . . . . ( . . . . ' f ' I ' ' . - r iUDITOR'S Wf\:RRANT REGISTER. , ~ J ,1c SANT A BARBARA COUNTY I , ~ . FUND===_:_:_:_---'------~ATE ____I _U_ M \, ' PAYEE ~ .uu ,,. WU. , . a. . ~ . . . ~- n ~ . . - " 1111116 ~ . PURPOSE titr.,._. .,._. __ _ u -i 1111, . Cl U.S , ~ . . - . . . I SYMBOL ~- utan UYalS , 11 u - lU a I wau . WARRANT ALLOWED FOR ,. . . . . , . ~ lie n1 . ~- . . . u. u . u. JlT.M a.11 saae ~,. , . ,. i.11~ 1-n1 n 2 . . ., 1.41t . i.1a . 1.141 . 1~ ' REMARKS 119,1 .1 -. llllllldl 1,1u,~ . .i . . ,,._ .al. Ill a 18 1.11~ ue.,11 1 . , AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANT A BARBARA COUNTY . , FUND ~ DATE OCIDllD 5 19'70 NUMBER PAYEE I PURPOSE SYMBOL WARRANT ALLOWED FOR REMARKS i UOJ. alllaO~D . 151 20 oo ~ . llJ.00 llOJ ~ 151 22 s.10 ,. c . ss 151 22 19.80 9t05 ._. c.niJo 4161 7.20 8106 170.10 Cltl 8llfl'llija , . 24.ao ~O.Le 60.00 ltOI .-.J. J . 1. 1 ''' ftlG 4'G1ui aut: ld'i 6.00 ltll Willim . 7.50 nu Ci-., 151 23 M.20 Dlpt ltll 151 J 60.20 atA Go1et.a --- ta 152 8 I n.a lllD 8915 1leaeW. Oil Cle 1.14t.67 ft a916 . --~ 152 17 LOO 8917 --~llh 152. 18 850.02 i. aeplle CO u 45.71 155 14 28.13 lllf*MwlN 157 21 17.58 J.9 r.o . qat tao!.-. 155 15 JJ.oo 74.JS 8'21 27.50 ~1 .U,- 10.00 *1rlna.~ 4o 16.50 1924 a.so 8925 50 H IJlG ._ 10.oe an laYl4 '3. au-. oo .,. ~- . u. . 28.00 "" eus11., ~-- llllilllta1 Ceaalt .15 ,. Ula I0.00 8"1 . 10.00 ao.oo 81JJ ~-a.~- 27.50 ., _.ao 41.00 ans -.I Clelilalt. 1'2.50 ., . .so 8937 'l'Y~-- u.oo 3. All 11tl 155 18 160.08 nn 510 to . llad.a M5.00 155 J2 26.73 A C - 157 NUMBER .,., ,., ., . , s1 1953 89" ,. 8955 .,. 8957 . H ''' , 11&5 - ,. 8970 .,1 nn 8t71 . ., .,., ,. .,. AC-157 I AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANT A BARBARA COUNTY FUND_ . J - PAYEE PURPOSE SYMBOL Jeff hJaJ aJa 155 22 Cl_. f Lalll9M 155 IS .lfla . a.a co CltJif -C ., Clllif -Co DIJ"Cae 156 2U UlUa t lr llllt:aa lg 15121 -- .,. 11te ,., --~- wuu. . ~. .1 , .-n. ~- . . Cll1alllla - ~ CIMSla ___ .i-r _ ~ftll-., he. .UM.~- ~- 11 C1*)c .aao ._ IJn co . 1:eaw -. . , . . . . , CX Coat:rillft , 1au 1.59 9 lS c1o 1D. JJ: uo au 160. u 150. 21 162. 20 5. 1t10 WARRANT ALLOWED FOR 22.74 U.M 72.M 15.U M.00 76._oo 85.00 25.76 s.H Jl.62 14.28 252.00 st.oo _ 2 . , , n.oa 750.00 1.2so.oo 30.00 a.000.00 1.Ml.H a.se.11 2.81.H na.eo 1.1 . 00 4D.OO 10l.t2 123.45 11.60 a.20 JOJ.16 1,es.00 REMARKS . ltJ.00 1lt . 00 C8 D . ' NUMBER nu -' , - - l . ., - . ' - AC- I !57 .- , PAYEE ,. . ._1N . .-.J. OD -I ii Ce ~ ' r, ~-. lllipt ,. aJ, IO Cll,t.f Mlllia Cit _&&. ----- C.Uf C. . - ~~ PURPOSE .- . ' '\ . SYMBOL . H aa 171.' 1t4. * 114 17'. 1 . uoe 2 WS.1 2ft 181 aU usaJ ,~ . 11 lt .a. 191 21 I - r. ' 9 I lS I J J IO a I 1MS lOY a I uoaa lll . ,., I lM a I .,., la J 1a1 , * "'\. WARRANT A LLOWED FOR an.M , . 111.11 , . .,. , . , 1 IO.tl 1.,n._ao . 11.IJ . 1.4U.M ., . . _ _ u. ua. 14.'9 ' 1.01 . ltt.D e.u i 1~ '~ . .u.10 (7,IU4'1) H4JO .' .'" .". ,_ REMARKS . I .' J . NUMBER - . . AC-157 . _, I ( AUDITOR'S wARRANT .REGISTER "t SANT A BARBARA cou~ . I FUND . ---~----DATE PAYEE PURPOSE SYMBOL - ,. Uat . ., .I. *' . .,., , t , UI a 1 m11 Ill J . , . ., . . " M M a.t UaM UM ' ' UM UaJA lfM naw . ' a BU ' . T 14 ?au . n au u M u~, WARRANT A LLOWED FOR fU~J -~ , u.n &II ,. .,. ., ~,. . ~ . . . , . , . . --~- . w .J. u. , , IG71 , 1.1 -, 11~ . 1 REMARKS ,., - ' I N UMBER l , 'P' . , AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER FUNDPAYEE , . a L' -SANTA BARBARA COUNTY . " . '--~~~~__D.ATE-=-=====o.==---=-~~1~1~"~ PURPOSE SYMBOL . . . u . tla M N aw 1U a 14 J.118 M 116a M maw Ill 1' Ut&M 111 M Jll." 11114 WaJA llO. )A Ula M lAM in a JA ueaw 191. 14 WARRANT ALLOWED FOR (1."7.11) . . a1 . ., . n. 1 U71 1.11 u . n.a . ,. Uti! a n ~u Ht.a n.ae I REMARKS (e.in) NUMBER .MU . 1117 AC I !57 I )i AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER PAYEE . , ._ OdU.Mel ' SANT A BARBARA COUNTY PURPOSE . .u1. . (ent 'JI) ' . - SYMBOL ta t 1teW ltl - & ' WARRANT ALLOWED FOR JU.JO , * . u . M 111411 . 11.11 , u- REMARKS . ,. a. ,.m. . .n. - - 1i,mna. ,M.uls.- . ' I t ' : AUDITOR'S. WARRANT REGISTER ! \ - FUND NUMBER PAYEE IOU 91UAta .i - t. eJf.f . Cldl--- ' ' . , . lt--.o. 9117 . , . - eiillf . . tlll ., ,. . . AC-I !57 SANT A BARBARA COUNTY '------LJATE OD.tllD J. 1979 PURPOSE lilillllii'. ou ' ' ' SYMBOL . Ill S. n ., . - - na . ~-- llt 11 au WARRANT ALLOWED FOR u. SJ.a . l, . UY.10 Ml.II i.111.1.- . . .7. . . .,. u, . . " s.u , . M.11 lSI. REMARKS .- cu . 00 Ill I NUMBER AC I !57 r PAYEE ' ' . """"" AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PURPOSE SYMBOL ( ' WARRANT ALLOWED FOR - . . REMARKS I , NUMBER #reu a n *-'Ill ~,117 . ' AC-157 ' I PAYEE . , I ~ , . . '. I ' I ' 111.UAir AUDITOR'S WARR4NT REGISTER SANT A BARBARA COUNTY PURPOSE SYMBOL . . .,. . ., . , . U9 1 ~-"1 WARRANT ALLOWED FOR . . . 'ii f.I.,~_:. REMARKS .J ' NUMBER ' ' - . ~- A C-1!57 PAYEE ' f M ~~ - AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANT,A BARBARA COUNTY . . PURPOSE SYMBOL . . . . ~ . . . "" L UM WARRANT ALLOWED FOR . I REMARKS ' ' ' NUMBER AC-1!57 ;. 4 . ~ ~ ' . \-. ' AUDITOR'S WAR:RANT REGiSTER PAYEE l I ~ I , 't C.' ,- I . ' . t . ' 1 " - . 1 ' ' . . .-w . . . 111 . , r'"-f-(' . ' ' . . -- ;- ' . '' . . ; SANT A BARBARA COUNTY I ., PURPOSE SYMBOL ,., . ~ ' ' ' . . . ~ ' WARRANT ALLOWED FOR l.19t I Ut.-io Ms-.a i:.at.M l ., ~ s.1 us 9'1.IO I REMARKS 1.24 October 5, 1970 of a petition opposing the Specia~ C~~e Home by reference to a display map 9n ~he screen and explai ned the background of subj ect hearing. Mr. Walter F. Schwank, appellant, appeared to rebut each of the arguments in favor outlined in the above- referred-to Zoning Report . He alleged that six is the magic number for residences because i t avoids the requirement for State inspection and still provides adequate income. He doubts if thi s is a non-profit venture and believes it is a corporation presumably organized for profit - a proposed commercial venture in an R- 1 zone . The main house does not consist of six (6) bedrooms and three (3) baths but of three (3) bedrooms and two (2) baths. A converted garage consist s of three (3) cubicles, a bath and hallway, totaling about 400 square feet and 85 square feet per cubicle . The guest house contains a bedroom, bath and kitchen in violation of the code . They do not ''fear'' the type of occupancy but they do fear I a commercial intrusion and ''spot" zoning . If the permit is not granted, the women would not become wards of the taxpayer and the house will not go off the tax roll or become a "hippy haven". He obj ected to the emotional manner in which signatures were secured on the pet ition of the proponents. Gene Forsell, Mission Canyon resident, appeared in opposition, displaying a . map of t he area under discussion wit h the publicly used land colored green. Up until this time, there has been no spot zoning in the area. He urged maintaining the zoning integrity . Mr. Austin Mardon, Mission Canyon resident, appeared to stress that the character of the neighborhood will be fundamentally altered by granting the permit. In response to a question from Supervisor Clyde, Mr. Mardon stated that he would obj ect if only five (5) mentally retarded people were allowed to reside in the home . There was a show of hands of people present in the audience in opposition . Mr. Jerry Beaver, Mission Canyon resident, appeared in opposition to any commercial use of the property in the area . This is an institutional use that can be located in many other areas. Mrs . Lucie Vanderstock appeared in opposition and stated that all surrounding neighbors are opposed . Mrs. Jessie McMillan, next-door neighbor to proposed home, appeared in opposition saying that in her eyes this is an institution. Mrs. George Andrews, a Riviera property owner, appeared to ask if the proposed locat ion provided adequate privacy for the residents as well as the neighbors since it is only an 85 ft. lot on a 103 ft . frontage with 25 feet between houses . Att orney J . Robert Andrews for the proponents, appeared and filed petitions favoring the development from 196 Mission Canyon residents . He explained the meaning of the term "mildly mentally disturbed'' . The burden of proof is on the appellant, he stat ed . The Conditional Use Permit was granted and is allowed under the ordinance. No compelling evidence has been introduced to prove that this will violate health, welfare or property values of neighboring residents or will have an adverse effect upon community services. Referring to AB 2406, he cited the philosophy of the Act that mentally handicapped persons should live in normal community surroundings and that housing of six (6) or fewer residents is considered a residential use of the property. He answered i n the negative to Supervisor Callahan's question whether I October 5, 1970 AB 2406 superseded local zoning laws . He requested denial of the Conditional Use Permit. Speaking to the Conditional Exception, Attorney Andrews stated that a variance is not bad per se but is a legal procedure provided for by law and that to grant it does not establish a legal precedence. This is a classic example of what a Conditional Exception is designed to do, he stated. The applicant would be happy to construct fences if the neighbors wanted this, to restrict total occupancy to five (5) persons would result in two people caring for only three disturbed persons . which is an under-economic use of specially-trained manpower. He requested the 125 appeal be denied with regard to the Conditional Exception and the Planning Commission action be concurred in. The Board recessed for five minutes. Present : Supervisors George H. Clyde 2 Joe J. Callahan, Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell; and J. E. Lewis, Clerk. Supervisor Clyde in the Chair. Sister DePaul of St. Vincent's School appeared to define the mentally retarded child and his characteristics. He is vulnerable, needs protective custody and is not l ikely to impinge on anyone's privacy. She was talking about the proposed residents in particular . Mesdames Margaret Diaz, Marie Johnson and Muriel Ridland appeared and s poke of a favorable experience with Mrs. Blanche Clark's supervision of retarted chil dren in their neighbor hood. Mrs. Elizabetta Hender son appeared speaking as a grandmother of a handicapped child who would be concerned that her grandchild would have a home such as the proposed one in the event the chil d outl ived its parents . Mrs . Edwin Delat or~e, Mission Canyon resident, appear ed in favor of the home. Mr. Austin Mardon appeared in rebuttal, referred to AB-23 and the fact that granting a variance will deprive persons of their property rights unless care is taken to continue such granting. He filed a copy of the bill with the Clerk and referred to Government Code Section 65906 as being applicable. Messrs. Beaver and Schwank appeared in rebuttal stating their objection was to the Exception real izing that the proposed use is a permitted one but fee l ing that the spirit and purpose of the ordinance woul d be violated and that this woul d be a ''foot in the door''. Attorney Andrews stated that Government Code Section 65906 sustained their position and that they were asking for parity in privilege . Deputy County Counsel John Mitchell pointed out that AB 2406 is in effect until October 21st, and does not affect our own County which defines single family R-1 zoning as compatible with the proposed Special Care Home . In essence the County is being asked to change the definition of Special Care Home or increase the occupancy. to eight (8) persons . Once AB 2406 becomes effective the property would have to be 1.26 October 5, 1970 rezoned and a use variance could not be granted. Attorney Andrews stated that a Conditional Use Permit requires all licensing provisions to be complied with. This is not a ''use'' variance but an ''area'' variance. The use remains residential but the n11mber of people residing in the home changes. Chairman Clyde reminded the Board that this is a very emotional isste and that approximately a year ago the Board of Supervisors went through long hours of deliberation to determine what a Special Care Home was and the n11mber of residents that should be allowed. He could not see how they can increase the residency from five to eight inasmuch as there are no exceptional conditions to the particular house and property. If the Board was wrong in setting up a limit of five, then they should change the ordinance and not attempt to do it by variance. He felt he would have to support the appeal and would challenge anyone to find grounds for a variance here. Supervisor Grant stated tha t perhaps the ordinance should be reconsidered . . He felt that the applicants had made a strong case from a practical point of view and would tend to support the Planning Commission action. Supervisor Callahan indicated that he favored the Planning Commission action and could not agree with the arguments of the appellants. ''We must give the handicapped a break'' , he said. Supervisor Beattie reiterated what Supervisor Clyde had stated. ''This proposal smacks of a commercial venture", he stated. Supervisor Tunnell agreed with Supervisor Beattie and stated that we must consider the priority of residents who own their homes in the area. He felt that he could not support a home of this type where there is so much controversy on the part of the residents and would support the appeal and deny the application. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell , seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried, it is ordered that the appeal of Walter F. Schwank from Planning Commission approval on request of J. Robert Andrews on behalf of G. Schuirman ~Associates (70-CP-.48) for Conditional Use Permit and recommendation for Conditional Exception to allow special care home for eight (8) mentally retarded women instead of five (5) be, and the same is hereby, sustained, and the application for Conditional Use Permit and Conditional Exception be, and the same is hereby,denied. Supervisors Callahan and Grant voted ''NO'' on this motion. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Planning Department be, and it is hereby, requested to study this problem and bring forth recommendations for the Board to consider that will take care of situations of this type . The Chairman then declared that his regular meeting of October 5, 1970 , be, and the same hereby, duly and regularly continued to Tuesday, October 6, 1970, at 10 o'clock, a.m. I Agreement bet. the Ceunty - Santa Maria Council for Retarded Children for funding for Program of Veca- tienal Rehabilitatie Services - Comm.unity Werk Exp. fer Handica ped Persens / greement bet. Ceunt WORK, Inc. for funding for a Pregra f Vecational Rehabilitatien Service fer Handicapped Pers I Request for estab. ef Special Fire one in the Cuyama Area / ~-.-- -- October 6, 1970 Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara , State of California, Tuesday, October 6, 1970, at 10 o 'clock, a .m. Present: Supervisors George H. Clyde, Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell; and J. E. Lewis, Clerk. Absent: Supervisor Joe J. Callahan Supervisor Clyde in the Chair The above roll was called and then the Board recessed the regular meeting until 11 o'clock, a.m. , in order to sit as a Board of Equalization. At 11 O'clock, a .m., the Board reconvened . Present: Supervisors George H. Clyde, Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell; and J. E. Lewis, Clerk. Absent: Supervisor Jo~ J. Callahan Supe ryi or Clyde in the Chair In the Matter of Execution of Agreement between the County and Santa Maria Council for Retarded Children to provide funding for Program of Vocational Rehabilitation Services and Community Work Experience for Handicapped Persons. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO , 70-624 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Execution of Agreement between the County and \ WORK, Inc. to provide funding for a Program of Vocational Rehabilitation Services for Handicapped Persons . s Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell , seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: ] ESOLUI ION NO . 70-62.2 . (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Report of Administrative Officer On Request of Establishment of Special Fire Zone in the Cuyama Area. The Above- entitled report dated September 30, 1970, was received by the Board, read by the Clerk and ordered placed on file. 127 128 eselutien fer An exatien ef ~aller Park ajestic Tract Adj . Areas t eunty Service rea #5 fer rovidiDg Stre ighting ; October 6, 1970 ln th.e Matter of Resolution of Application for Annexation of Waller ~ark Majestic Tract and Adjacent Areas to County Service Area No. 5 for the Purpose of Providing Street lighting. (Cont'd) Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimous ly, the following resol ution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO. 70-626 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) It is further ordered that the matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the County Counsel for the necessary fil ings with the Local Agency Form~ tion Commission. greeaeat bet. In the Matter of Execution of Agreement between the County and eunty * hildreas Pre- Chil drens Protective Society regarding Pilot Proj ect for Five-Month Period Commencing ective Seciet re Pilet Proje October 1, 1970 . fer 5 me. pd. eg. Oct. 1, 1 0 Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and I eq. ef Stew anch Ce. for erait te eprate a Privat and ReclaatiOSt reject I eq. fer utherizatien ign Centracts ith Banks * eau Ce. relatdve tp Feed Staap regraa I carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: :RESOLUTION NO, 70-627 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Reconnnendation of Director Publ ic Works for Approval on Request of Stow Ranch Company for Permit to Operate a Private Land Reclamation Project on their Property. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the above- entitled recommendation of the Director Public Works be, and the same is hereby, confirmed. ) In the Matter of Request of Welfare Director for Authorization to Sign Various Contracts with Banks and Loan Companies relative to Food Stamp Program. Chairman Clyde pointed out that he is a director of the Santa Barbara National Bank; Supervisor Tunnell is a director of Preferred Savings and Loan of Santa Maria; and Supervisor Beattie is Treasurer of the Lompoc Savings and Loan, Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Welfare Director be, and he is hereby, authorized to sign contracts for the Board of Supervisors with banks and loan companies relative to the Food Stamp Program. In the Matter of Communications. The following connnunications were received by the Board, read by the Clerk and ordered placed on file: ~ 1) Frank Takken-Expression of Appreciation for Courtesies extended by various County offices. 2) Mendocino County Board of Supervisors - Resolution urging defeat of Proposition 18 (diversion of gas tax fund) at November 3, 1970 General Election. Desigaatien ef Jeha Wiester as Cemaonity Envirenaeatal Ceunc Rep. 5-Membe Ceunty Petrele Ordinance Ce-. Neainatiea of Denal F. Sweeney, M.D. te Comm. te Study Rules it Regulatiens of Air Pellutien Centre District Offer ef Presbyteria Church Property fer Sale Neaiaation ef Superviser Grant as Dir. ef Ceuaty Superviser Assec. of Ca. it Superviser Beattie a Dir. of Se. Ca. Regiaal Assec. ef Ceunty Supervisers fer 1971 Reselutien that Ceunty net be held acceuntable for Discrepancies in State's Revised Audi Revisien I Request fer pplicatien.s under itle VIII ef the o ug Act of 1964 October 6, 1970 In the Matter of Designation of John L. Wiester as Community Environment al Council Representative on Five-Member County Petroleum Ordinance Committee. A letter dated September 24, 1970, from the Community Environmental Council designating John L. Wiester as representative of said Council on County Petroleum Ordinance Committee, was received by the Board and read by the Clerk. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that Mr. John L. Wiester, 2255 Featherhill Road, Montecito, California, be, and he is hereby, designated as Community Environmental Council representative on five-member County Petroleum Ordinance Committee . In the Matter of Nomination of Santa Barbara County Tuberculosis and Health Association of Donal F. Sweeney, M.D. , to Committee to Study Rules and Regulations of Air Pollution Control District . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the above- entitled matter be, and the same is hereby, continued to Tuesday, October 13, 1970 In the Matter of Offer of Lassman Realty of Presbyterian Church Property for Sale. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the above- entitled communication be, and the same is hereby, referred to the Director Public Works . In the Matter of Nomination of Supervisor Grant as Director of County Supervisors Association of California and Supervisor Beattie as Director of Southern California Regional Association of County Supervisors for 1971 . Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that Daniel G. Grant be, and he is hereby, nominated as a Dir ector of the County Supervisors Association of California for 1971. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunneli and carried unanimously, it is ordered that Francis H. Beattie be, and he is hereby, nominated as a Director of the Southern California Regional Association of County - Supervisors for 1971. -- _,__ ___________ , ____ ~~~- ~ In the Matter of Resolution of Lake County Board of Supervisors that County not be held accountable for Discrepancies in State' s Revised Audit Revision. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the above- entitled resolution be, and the same is hereby, placed on file and a copy referred to the Welfare Director In the Matter of Request of State of California Coordinating Council for Higher Education for Applications under Title VIII of the Housing Act of 1964. 129 Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the above- entitled request be, and the same i~ hereby, referred to the Administrative Officer . 1.30 October 6, 1970 repesed Centre Acces~ Highway Agreeaeat fer that sectien State Hihgway Reute 166 bet. 0.4 llile west Beaita Scheel lei In the Matter of Proposed Controlled Access Highway Agreement of ir 0.4 mile wes ef Bleaaer Rd. Approval of Minutes of Oct 5, 1970 Meetin State Division of Highways for that section of State Highway Route 166 between 0.4 mile west of Bonita School Road and 0.4 mile west of Blosser Road, Fifth Supervisorial District. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the above-entitled matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the Road Commissioner and Planning Department. The Board recessed until two o'clock, p .m. At two o'clock, p.m., the Board reconvened and went into Executive Session on personal matters. I I J. Lewis, Present : Supervisors George H. Clyde, Joe J. Callahan, Daniel G. Grant, Francis H, Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell; and J.E. Lewis, Clerk At four o'clock, p .m., the Board reconvened and then adjourned sine die. The foregoing Minutes are hereby approved. rm an er Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California, October 13, 1970. at 9:30 o'clock, a,m, Present: Supervisor George H. Clyde, Joe J. Callahan, Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, anq Curtis Tunnell; and J, E. Lewi s, Clerk,. Supervisor Clyde in the Chair - In the Matter of Approval of Minutes of October 5, 1970 Meeting. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the reading of the minutes of the October 5, 1970 meeting be dispensed with, and the minutes approved, as submitted. Recommendation In the Matter of Planning Commission Recommendation to Adopt an to Adopt an Ordinance to Ordinance to Amend Article IV of Ordinance No . 661, on Request of John Mar Persoon to amend Art. IV of Ordinance Rezone Property from 3-E-1-0 to A-1-X-O at 4998 Foothill Road, Carpinteria. 661 on req. of John Mar Perso n ' I to rezone property from 3-E-1-0 to A-1- X-O at 4998 Foothill Rd., Carpinteria. I ' \ I Req. of Rancho Santa Barbara for Revised Development Plan to Permit Construction uae o Lighthouse. Macco Corp I " October 13, 1970 ' Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that Monday, November 2, 1970, at 2 o'clock, p .m. be, and the same is hereby, set as the date and time for a public hearing on the recommendation of the Planning Commission to initiate an ordinance to amend Article IV of Ordinance No . 661 of the County of Santa Barbara, from request of John Mar Persoon (70-RZ-73) to rezone property described as Assessor's Parcel No . 3-040-25 . and is located approximately 400 feet northeasterly from the junction of Foothill Road and Linden Avenue, and known as 4998 Foothill Road, Carpinteria Valley, from the 3-E-1-0, Single Family Estate District, which permits. single family residences on 3-acre minimum building sites with Oil Drilling Combining Regulations, to the A- l -X-0, . Exclusive Agricultural District, which permits certain Agricultural uses on 5-acre I building sites; with Oil Drilling Combining Regulations, on the basis of the S11mmary, Report of Findings and Recommendation as set forth in attached Resolution No . 70-100, and that notice be given by publication in the Carpinteria Herald, a newspaper of general circulation, as follows, to-wit: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA STATE OF CALIFORNIA Notice of P~blic Hearing on Recommendation of Planning Commission to Adopt Ordinance to Amend Article IV of Ordinance No. 661 from Request of John Mar Persoon to Rezone Property. (70-RZ-73), Carpinteria. NOTICE is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California on Monday, November 2, 1970, at 2 o'clock, p .m. , in the Board of Supervisors Hearing Room, Fourth Floor, County Administration Building, City of Santa Barbara, State of California, on the recommendation of the Planning Commission to adopt an ordinance amending Article IV of Ordinance No. 661 and to rezone property described as Assessor's Parcel No . 3-040- 25, located approximately 400 feet northeasterly from the j unction of Foothill Road and Linden Avenue, Carpinteria Valley, from the 3-E-1-P, Single Family Estate District:, which permits single family residences on 3- acre minimum building sites with Oil Dr.illing Combining Regulations, to the A-1- X-0, Exclusive Agricultural District, which permits certain Agricultural uses on 5-acre building sites; with Oil Drilling Combining Regulations, on the basis of the Report of Findings and Recommendation as set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. 70-100, from the request of John Mar Persoon (70-RZ-73) to rezone Assessor's Parcel No. 3-040-25. WITNESS my hand and seal this 13th day of October, 1970 J.E. Lewis (SEAL) J. E. LEWIS, County Clerk and Ex-Officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors It is further ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the County Counsel for preparation of the appropriate ordinance In the Matter of Planni ng Commission Recommendation to Adopt an Ordinance to Amend Section 581 of Article IV of Ordinance 1988, on Request of Rancho Santa(Macco Barbara to allow for Revised Development Plan to Permit Construction and use of Corp) . 132 October 13, 1970 Lighthouse 90 feet high, to be operated and maintained by U.S. Coast Guard and to replace Observation Tower and Museum, for Gaviota Village. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that Monday, November 2, 1970, at 2 o'clock, p.m. be, and the same is hereby, set as the date and time for a public hearing on the . recommendation of the Planning Commission to initiate an ordin.ance to amend Section 581 of Article IV of Ordinance No . 661 as amended, Ordinance No. 1988, from request of Rancho Santa Barbara (70-RZ-74 and 70-CP-54) to allow for revised development plan, described as Assessor ' s Parcel No . 81-130-40, located on the north side of U. S. High- way 101, approximately 3/4 mile east of Gaviota State Beach Park, Gaviota Area . This lighthouse would replace the observation tower and museum approved by the Planning Commission on October 15, 1969, located approximately 400 feet northerly of the new proposed location, on the basis of the S1111unary, Report of Findings and Recommendation as set forth in attached Resolution No. 70-101, and that notice be given by publication in the Santa Barbara News-Press, a newspaper of general circulation as follows, to-wit: Notice of Public Hearing on Recommendation of Planning Commission to Adopt Ordinance to Amend Section 581 of Article IV of Ordinance No. 661 from Request of Rancho Santa Barbara. (70-RZ-74). NOTICE is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California on Monday, November 2, 1970, at 2 o'clock, p.m. , in the Board of Supervisors Hearing Room, Fourth Floor, County Administration Building, City of Santa Barbara, State of California, on the recommendation of the Planning Commission to adopt an ordinance amending Section 581 of Article IV of Ordinance No. 661 of the County of Santa Barbara as amended, Ordinance No. 1988, to allow for a Revised Development Plan to permit construction and use of a lighthouse 90 ft. in height to be operated and maintained by the United States Coast Guard, and to be located approximately 110 feet north of the Highway property line and approximately 90 feet southwesterly from the existing ''General Store'' building. This lighthouse would replace the observation tower and museum approved by the Planning Commission on October 15, 1969 (69-CP-62), located approximately 400 feet northerly of the new proposed location. Said revision affects the following paragraphs of Section 581: 1. Paragrapi (a) which pertains to the general arrangement of buildings, structures, parking, landscape areas, etc. 2. Paragraph (d) which pertains to the uses of the property. 3 . Paragraph (f) which pertains to exterior lighting. 4 . Paragraph (h) which pertains to the allowed height of the buildings . The property is identified as a portion of Assessor 's Parcel No. 81-130-40. , located on the north side of U. s. Highway 101, approximately 3/4 mile east of Gaviota State Beach Park, Gaviota Area, on the basis of the Report of Findings, and Recommendation as set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. 70-101, from the request of Rancho Santa Barbara (70-RZ-74). WITNESS my hand and seal this 13th day of October, 1970 J. E. LEWIS (SEAL) J. E. LEWIS, County Clerk and Ex-Officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors 4ift October 13, 1970 It is further ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred .to the County Counsel for preparation of the appropriate ordinance . Hearing set . for In the Matter of Recommendations of Planning Commission and Agricultural adoption of Ord. amend. Art. IV Preserve Ad~isory Committee for Adoption of Ordinance Amending Article IV of o Ord. 661 to rezo properties in Lompo Ordinance No . 661 to Rezone Certain Properties in Lompoc and Santa Maria Areas; and Santa Maria areas; proposed creation Proposed Creation of Agricultural Preserves. of Ag. Preserves 1 1 Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that Monday, November 2, 1970, at 2 0 1 clock, p .m. be, and the same is hereby, set as the dat e and time for public hearings on recommendations of the Planning Commission and Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee to adopt ordinances amending Article IV of Ordinance No . 661, as amended, of the County of Santa Barbara, to rezone the following properties, on the basis that they conform to the General Plan of the County, and to approve applications to create Agricultural Preserves on said properties under the provisions of Chapter 1443, Statutes of 1965, known as the California Land Conservation Act, from a land use standpoint, on the basis that t hey conform to the criteria established by the Board of Supervisors of Santa Barbara County: / 1) Airey Ranch {70-AP- 6) {70- RZ- 17), Lompoc . 1 2) Durley, Ainscough~ McLanahan (70-AP-29) (70-RZ-57), Santa Maria. 1 3) Cossa {70-AP-35) {70-RZ-62) , Santa Maria . 1 4) Henning (70-AP-43) {70- RZ- 69) , Lompoc . It is further ordered that notice be given by publication in the Santa Maria Times, and Lompoc Record, newspapers of general circulation, as follows, to-wit: Notice of Public Hearing on Recommendation of Planning Commission and Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee for Adoption of Ordinance No . 661 to Rezone Airey Ranch Property, in the Lompoc Area {70-RZ-17); and Proposed Creation of Agricultural Preserve (70-AP-6). NOTICE is hereby given that public hearing will be held by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California on Monday, November 2, 1970, at 2 o'clock, p .m. , in the Board of Supervisors Hearing Room, Fourth Floor, County Administration Building, City of Santa Barbara, State of California, on the recommendation of the Planning Commission, as well as the Agricultural Advisory Committee, to approve adoption of an amendment to Article IV of Ordinance No . 661 of the County of Santa Barbara, as amended, to rezone property of Airey Ranch in the Lompoc area from the ''U'' Unclassified District Classification to the 100-AG General Agricultural District Classification {permits general agricultural uses on 100- acre building sites), per Planning Commission Resolution No. 70-37, on the basis said property conforms to the General Plan of the County (70 -RZ-17); and to approve application to create ~gricultural Preserve on said property under the provisions of Chapter 1443, Statutes 1965, known as the California Land Conservation Act, from a land use standpoint, on the basis that it conforms to the criteria established by the Board of Supervisors of Santa Barbara County (70 -AP-6). The Airey Ranch property is described as Assessor's Parcel Nos. 99-220-13; 99- 230- 05 and - 14, located north and south of State Highway 246 approximately 3~ miles 133 ~ 134 October 13, 1970 west of Buellton, Lompoc area . WITNESS my hand and seal this 13th day of October, 1970. J . E. LEWIS , County Clerk and Ex-Officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Notice of Public Hearing on Recommendation of Planning Commission and Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee for Adoption of Ordinance No . 661 t o Rezone Durley, Ainscough ~McLanahan Property, in the Santa Maria Area (70-RZ-57); and Proposed Creation of Agricultural Preserve (70-AP-29) NOTICE is hereby given t hat public hearing will be held by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California on Monday, November 2, 1970, at 2 o'clock, p .m. , in the Board of Supervisors Hearing Room, Fourth Floor, County Admi nistration Building, City of Santa Barbara, State of California, on t he recommendation 0f the Planning Commission, as well as the Agricultural Advisory Com- mittee, to approve adoption of an amendment to Article IV of Ordinance No . 661 of the County of Santa Barbara, as amended, to rezone property of Durley, Ainscough ~ McLanahan in t he Santa Maria area from the 10-AG General Agricultural District Classification t o the 40-AG General Agricultural District Classification (permits general agricultural uses on 40-acre building sites), per Planning Commission Resolution No . 70-94, on the basis said property under the provisions of Chapter 1443, Statutes of 1965, known as the California Land Conservation Act, from a land use standpoint, on the basis that it conforms to the criteria established by the Board of Supervisors of Santa Barbara County (70-AP-29) . The Durley, Ainscough and McLanahan property is described as Assessor' s Parcel Nos . 117-170-04 and -07, located north of State Highway 166 approximately 2/3 mile westerly from Blosser Road, Santa Maria area . WITNESS my hand and seal this 13th day of October, 1970 . J . E. LEWIS {SEAL) Notice of Public Hearing on Recommendation of Planning Commission and Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee for Adoption of Ordinance No . 661 to Rezone the Cossa Propert y, in the Santa Maria area (70 - RZ - 62); and Proposed Creation of Agricultural Preserve (70 -AP-35) . NOTICE is hereby given that public hearing will be held by the Board of Superviosrs of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California on Monday, November 2, 1970, at 2 o'clock, p .m. , in the Board of Supervisors Hearing Room, Fourth Floor, County Administration Building, City of Santa Barbara, State of California, on the ' 135 October 13, 1970 recommendati9n of the Planning Commission , as well as the Agricultural Advisory Committee, t o approve adoption of an amendment to Article IV of Ordinance No. 661 of the County of Santa Barbara, as amended, to rezone property of Cossa in the Santa Maria area from. the ''U" Unclassified District Classification to the 40-AG General Agricultural District Classification {permits general agricultural uses on 40-acre building sites), per Planning Conmission Resolution No. 70-94, on the basis said property conforms to the General Plan of the County (70-RZ-62); and to approve application to create Agricultural Preserve on said property under the provisions of Chapter 1443, Statutes of 1965, known as the California Land Conservation Act, from a land use standpoint, on the basis that it conforms to the criteria established by the Board of Supenrisors of Santa Barbara County {70-AP-35). The Cossa property is described as Assessor's Parcel Nos. 117-020-17 and -28, located approximately 3/4 mile northerly from Bonita Lateral Road and 1-% miles easterly from Bonita School Road, Santa Maria area. WITNESS my hand and seal this 13th day of October, 1970. J. E. LEWIS (SEAL) J. E. LEWIS, County Clerk and Ex-Officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Notice of Public Hearing on Recommendation of Planning Commission and Agricultural Preserve Advisory Conmittee for Adoption of Ordinance No. 661 to Rezone the Henning Property, in the Lompoc Area (70-RZ-69) ; and Proposed Creation of Agricultural Preserve {70- AP-43) . NOTICE is hereby given that public hearing will be held by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California on Monday, November 2, 1970, at 2 o'clock, p .m., in the Board of Supervisors Hearing Room, Fourth Floor, County Administration Building, City of Santa Barbara, State of California, on the recommendation of the Planning Commission, as well as the Agricultural Advisory Com- mittee, to approve adoption of an amendment to Article IV of Ordinance No. 661 of the County of Santa Barbara, as amended, to rezone property of Henning in the Lompoc area from the R-A-0 Suburban Agricultural-residential District Classification to the 40-AG General Agricultural District Classification (permits general agricultural uses on 40-acre building sites and oil drilling), per Planning Commission Resolution No. 70-97, on the basis said property conforms to the General Plan of the County {70-RZ-69) ; and to approve application to create Agricultural Preserve on said property under the provisions of Chapter 1443, Statutes of 1965, known as the California Land Conservation Act, from a land use standpoint, on the basis that it conforms to the criteria established by the Board of Supervisors of Santa Barbara County (70-AP-43). The Henning property is described as Assessor's Parcel Nos . 93-030-11, 12, and -21, located south of Santa Ynez River on the east and west side of De Wolfe Avenue at its northern terminus, Lompoc area. WITNESS, my hand and seal this 13th day of October, 1970. J. E. LEWIS (SEAL) J. E. LEWIS, county Clerk and Ex-Officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors 1.36 Approval of Plans " Specs. for Const. of Lakeview Rd. , Hillview Rd. t Bradley Rd, Santa Maria, Job No. 5017.1 I October 13, 1970 It is further ordered that subject matter be, and t he same is hereby, referred to County Counsel for preparation of the appropriate documents . In the Matter of Approval of Plans and Specifications for Construction of Lakeview Road, Hillview Road to Bradley Road, Sant a Maria, Job No . 5017. 1. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carri ed unanimously, it is ordered that plans and specifications for construction of Lakeview Road, Hillview Road to Bradley Road, Santa Maria, Job No . 5017 .1 be, and the same is hereby, approved. It is further ordered that Thursday, November 5, 1970 at 3 o ' clock, p.m. be, and the same is hereby, set as the date and time for the opening of bids on subject proposal in the Santa Maria Office of the County Clerk, 312 E. Cook Street, Santa Maria, California, and that notice be given by publication in the Santa Maria Times, a newspaper of general circulation, as follows, to-wit: COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA STATE OF CALIFORNIA ROAD DEPARTMENT NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS Sealed proposals will be received at the Office of the County Clerk of Santa County, Office Building, 312 East Cook Street, Santa Maria, California 93454, on or before 3:00 P.M. on the 5th day of November, 1970, and will be opened and publicly read aloud on said day at said place on or about said time for: CONSTRUCTION OF LAKEVIEW ROAD Hillview Road t o Bradley Road SANTA MARIA Job No . 5017. 1 Bids are required for the entire work described therein. Copies of the Plans, the General and Special Provisions and blank forms suitable for use in bidding on said work may be obtained from the Office of the Road Commissioner, County Court House, Santa Barbara, California, and may be purchased therefrom for THREE DOLl.ARS ($3 . 00) per set, said purchase cost not to be refunded. No bid will be considered which is not in accordance with or on the forms herein referred to . Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California (Amended by Statutes 1968, Chapter 699, Paragraph 1, operative July 1, 1969) the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara has directed the publishing of the prevailing rate of wages with a copy of the same being on file at the Office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors . Each bid must be accompanied by a certified check, a cashier ' s check or bid bond in the amount of ten percent (10%) of the total of the bid, made payable to the County of Santa Barbara as a guarantee that the bidder, if awarded the contract, will enter into a contract for the performance thereof satisfactory to said Board of Supervisors . The successful bidder shall be required to quarantee the performance of this contract by a ''Faithful Performance Bond'' in the sum of one hundred percent (100%) of the contract bid, and a ''Contractor's Bond'' in the sum of fifty percent (50%) of the contract bid \ 1.37 October 13, 1970 The Board of Supervisors reserves the right to reject any or all bids, and to waive technical errors and discrepancies, if to do so seems to best serve the pub- lie interest. No bid will be accepted from a Contractor who has not been licensed in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 9, Division 111 of the Business and Professions Code. SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS: ''bidders must satisfy themselves by personal examination of the location of the proposed work and by such other means as they prefer as to the actual conditions and requirements of the work, and shall not at any time after submission of the bid, dispute, complain, or assert that there was any misunderstanding in regard to the nature or amount of work to be done." By order of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara , made this 13th day of October 1970. \ J. E. LEWIS Clerk of the Board of Supervisors .I \ I ! PROPOSAL TO THE COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA ROAD DEPARTMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF LAKEVIEW ROAD Hillview Road to Bradley Road SANTA MARIA Job No . 5017.1 IU in~ bOARD OF SUPERVISOK~ Of THE COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA: The undersigned as bidder decl th h 1 ~7t~~~~ ~~~~~:~!n~i~~lnciPa~~ .:;~hos:'n!:d0 ~.~.~~:~~.~rt~~~t~~~p!~!~r~:t~~de fully e . d h l any o er person, firm or corporation; that he has carecontrac~ am1~e t at ocatlon of the proposed work, the annexed proposed form of , ~ d he proposes and agrees If this proposal is accepted, that he will ~~n~~a~t withfth~ Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara in the form e copy o t e contract annexed hereto, to provide all necessar machiner t~ols, apparatus a~d other eq~lpm~nt needed, and to do all of the w~rk 1and fu~: ~~sh ~11 the m~ter1als specified in the contract, in the manner and the time ase~~~~e~~e:~~,~~~~han~n~c~~~~i~g t~ 1 ~he ~equirements of the Road Corrrnissioner Ing unit prices, to ~it: e wi ta e In full payment therefor the follow- I tern Est. Unit of Unit Price Total No. Quant. Measure Item Cin figures} (_in figures) 1 : Lump Lump Sum Sum Clearing and Grubbing Lump Sum . 2. Lump Lump Sum Sum Developing W'ater supply Lump Sum . . 3. 350 Cubic Yard Roadway excavation 4. 17,500 Cubic Yard Imported borrow . I I' I - ' \ . 1a1.ev I ew Koad Santa Marla Item Est . ./ No . Quan t. 5, 1. 25 6 13.0 7. 625 8. Lump Sum 9. 900 10. 365 . 1 1 235 12 . 150 13. 3.0 14. 1.0 15. 360 16. 25 17. 95 . ~ ~ Unit of Measure Ton Ton Pound Lump Sum Ton Ton . Li nea r Feet Square Yard Ton Ton - Li near Feet Li nea r Feet Cubic Yard PROPOSAL Un It Pr Ice Tota 1 I I tern (In f igures) (in figures) , Commerc ial ferti 1 izer . Straw . Seed . Fini sh roadway Lump Sum Aggregate base, Class 2 Asphal t conc rete, Type B Placing asphalt concrete dike Placing asphalt concrete . (M i scellaneous areas) . Liqu id asphalt, sc-70 . Asphalt emu l sion (fog sea 1 . coat . 2711 R. C.P., Class I I I Remove and realy 2711 R. C.P. and construct concrete col l ar Class B concrete (miscellaneous construction) . . TOTAL 1.38 Contract bet. County is Floyd H. Martinez, Ph.D, Mental Health Service October 13, 1970 In the Matter of Execution of Contract for Professional Services between County and Floyd H. Martinez, Ph.D. , Psychologist, Mental Health Services. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously , the following resoluti on was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO . 70- 628 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) ' Res. auth. Cou ty In t he Matter of Resolution Authorizing County Counsel and Director of Counsel is Dir. Resources and Collections to Institute Necessary Proceedings to Recover Moneys Owed County for Care and Services Rendered in Santa Barbara County General Hospital at of Resources is Collections to Recover Moneys Owed County fo services rende in S.B. County Gen. Hosp. at Santa Maria. edSanta Maria. I Issuance of l Negotiable Not of Santa Maria School Distric for $190,000.0 I Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, the following Resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO . 70-629 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Issuance of One Negotiable Note of Sant a Maria School District, for $190,000. 00 . Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO . 70-630 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) Issuance of 5 In the Matter of Issuance crf Five Negotiable Notes of Santa Maria Joint Negotiable Not s of Santa Maria Union High School District for Aggregate Amount of $250,000. 00 . Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and Joint Union Hi~. School DWk . .fr ~ 250 '000 ;co. 1 carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: I Pub. of Prevailing Wage Rates (amendments) of Rd. Dept. I Department. RESOLUTION NO . 70- 631 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Publication of Prevailing Wage Rates (Amendments) of Road Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Clerk be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to publish the following prevailing wage rates (amendments) of the Road Department in the Santa Barbara News-Press, a newspaper of general circulation, as follows, to-wit: COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA STATE OF CALIFORNIA ROAD DEPARTMENT NOTICE TO CQNTRACTORS Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State . of California (Amended by Statutes 1968 Chapter 679, Paragraph 1, operative July 1, 1969), the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara having ascertained the general prevailing rates of wages and employer payments for health and welfare, vacations, pensions and similar purposes applicable to highway work does direct the following to be published: October 13, 1970 Basic Rate Per Hour . Classification H. and W. 6.03 6.81 6.12 4 .805 4 . 695 6. 62 5 . 98 5 .48 4 .785 6. 27 6. 91 5 . 05 5 . 08 5 . 13 5 . 21 . .S. 4:3 5 .89 6. 015 5 . 05 6. 03 4 . 695 4 . 595 6. 91 6.03 4 . 595 4 .805 4 .785 7. 01 6. 11 6. 51 7.30 6. 62 6.81 6.81 6. 62 6. 91 6. 27 6.51 6. 81 6.91 7.01 6.81 6. 62 6. 91 5 . 11 Air Compressor, pump or generator operator . 4~ phw/p Asphalt plant engineer 45 phw/p Asphalt plant fireman 45_phw/p Asphalt raker and ironer 35 phw/p Asphalt shoveler 35 phw/p Boxman or mixer box operator 45 phw/p Carpenter 51 phw/p Cement mason 70 phw/p Concret e curer, impervious membrane and form oiler Concrete mixer operator (skip type) Concrete or asphalt spreading, tamping or finishing machine operator Driver of dump truck (less than 4 yards water level) Driver of dump truck (4 yards but less than 8 yards water level) . . Driver of dump truck (8 yards but less than 12 yards water level) . . . . . Driver of dump truck (12 yards but less than 16 yards water level) . . . . . 35 phw/p 45 phw/p 45 phw/p 65 phw/p 65 phw/p 65 phw/p 65 phw/p Driver of dump truck (16 yards but less than 25 yards water level) 65 phw/p Driver of dump truck (25 yards but less than 40 yards water level) 65 phw/p Driver of dump truck (more than 40 yards or more water level) (Single unit or combinat ion of vehicles) 65 phw/p Driver of truck (legal payload) ca~acity less than 6 tons Engineer, oiler, signalman Fine Grader . Flagman Heavy duty repairman Heavy duty repairman's helper Laborer 65 phw/p 45 phw/p 35 phw/p 35 phw/p 45 phw/p 45 phw/p 35 phw/p Layer of pipe, including sewer pi pe, drain pipe and underground tile 30 phw/p Maker and caulker of all pipe . joint s 30 phw/p Mot or Patrol operator 45 phw/p Pile dri verman, bridge or dock carpenter Power concrete s aw operator Reinforcing ironworker Roller operator (compacting) Roller operator (asphalt or f i ni sh) . . . . 51 phw/p 45 phw/p 38 phw/p 45 phw/p 45 phw/p Rubber tired earth moving equip . (single engine up to and incl . 25 yards struck) 45 phw/p Screed operator 45 phw/p Shovel, backhoe, dragline, clamshelloperator over 3/4 yards and up to 5 cubic yards M. R.c 45 phw/p Skiploader-Wheeltype-Ford, Ferguson, Jeep or similar type 3/4 yard or less (without drag type attachments) 45 phw/p Ski ploader-Wheeltype-Ford, Ferguson, etc . 3/4 yard or less . (With drag type attachments) 45 phw/ p Skiploader operator (crawler ~ wheel type over 3/4 yard up t o and including 1- 1/2 yards) 45 phw/p Ski ploader operator (crawler ~ wheel type, 1-1/2 yards up to and including 6-1/2 yards) 45 phw/p Tr actor loader operator (crawler and wheel type over 6-1/2 yards) . 45 phw/p Tractor operator-Bulldozer, tamper , scraper, up to and includi ng D-5 and similar types (100 H. P.) 45 phw/p Trenching machine operator (up to 6 foot depth capacity) 45 phw/p Trenching machine operator (over 6 foot depth capacity) 45 phw/p Water truck driver (under 2,500 gallons) 65 phw/p Empl oyer Payment Vac . ~ Hol . Pension 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 30 phw/p 45 phw/p 50 ph't'1/p . 25 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 55 phw/p 55 phw/p 55 phw/p 55 phw/p 55 phw/p 55 phw/p 55 phw/p 55 phw/p 30 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 25 phw/p 30 phw/p 45 phw/p 30 phw/p 50 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phwJp 30 ph,., Ip 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 30 phw/p 55 ph"t'1/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 80 phw/p 65 phw/p 75 phw/p 60 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 45 phw/p 45 phw/p 45 phw/p 45 phw/p 45 phw/p 45 phw/p 45 phw/p 45 phw/p 80 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 60 phw/p 80 phw/p 65 phw/p 80 phw/p 37.5 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 80 phw/p 45 phw/p 139 1.40 Change Order t Contract with E.H. Haskell Co. Project No 1032.2. Notice of Completion for Construction o Iuiprovements o Nicholas Lane. ( Notice of Completion for appl. of Aspha t Concrete Over y it Fog Seal Co on Constellat n Rd (V andenber Village) it Fos er Rd. (Orcutt W ) . I Final Report Construction Alisos Rd Cul Log Sta. 4.16 Job No. 5911. I Final Report on Box Colver on Lilac Dr. it Mt. Dr. wes of Mariposa L ne. I October 13, 1970 Basi c Rate Employer Payment Per Hour Classification H. and W. Vac . it Hol . Pensi on 5. 23 Water truck driver (2,500 to 4,000 gallons) - 65 phw/p 55 phw/p 45 phw/p 5 . 35 Water truck driver (4,000 gallons or more) 65 phw/p 55 phw/p 45 phw/p 7. 40 Electrician 35 phw/p 25 phw/ p In the Matter of Authorizing Chairman to Execute Change Order to Contract with E. H. Haskell Co. for Nicholas Lane, Project No . 1032. 2. Upon motion of Supervisor- Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman be, and he is hereby, author- . . ized and directed to execute the following Change Order to contract wi th E. H. , . . Haskell Co . for Nicholas Lane, Project No . 1032. 2. N11mber 1, increase -0f -$ 7 4 .-78 . . . . . . . . . . In the Matter of Filing Notice of Completion for Constru~t ion of Improvements on Nicholas Lane, (Vicini ty. of No~theast Santa Barbara) . Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and . . . "' . carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Road Commissioner be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to file Notice of Completion for construction of improve- ments on Nicholas Lane, (Vicinity of Northeast Santa Barbara) by E. H. Haskell . It is further ordered that the Clerk .be,. and he is hereby, authorized and directed to record said Notice .of Completion in the Office of the County Re- corder of the County of Santa Barbara. In the Matter of Filing Notice of Completion for Application of Asphalt Concrete Overlay and Fog Seal Coat on Constellation Road (Vandenberg Village) and . . . . . . . Foster Road (Orcutt Wye) . . . Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordeued that the .Road Commissioner be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to file Notice of Completion for application of asphalt concrete overlay and fog seal coat on Constellation Road (Vandenberg Village) and . , . . . . . Foster Road (Orvutt Wye. ) by A. J . Diani Construction Company . It is further ordered that -the .Clerk be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to record said Notice of Completion in the Office of the County Recorder of the County of Santa .Barbara In the Matter of Final Repor.t on Construction of Alisos Road Culvert, Log Station 4. 16, Job No . 5911 . Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the above- entitled Final Report be, and the same is hereby, placed on file . In the Matter of Final Report on Installation of 8 ' x 8 1 -Box Colvert on Lilac Drive and Mountain Drive west of Mariposa Lane, Projects 1909-C and 1912-B. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . October 13, 1970 Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the above-entitled Final Report be, and the same is hereby, placed on file. I 141 Final Report on In the Matter of Final Report on Installation of Culverts on Lilac Drive Installation of Culverts on Lilac Dr and Mountain Drive, Projects 1909-A, 1909-B, and 1912-A. ic Mt. Dr. I Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and Final Report on Installation of Culverts on Lilac Dr. ic Moun ta in Dr. / Acceptance of Grant Deed ($12, 390.00) for purchase of undivi l/5th interest in Tucker's Grove Park Extension. I Release of Count Claims for dama to County prope from Vehicular Accident in amt. of $10.80. I carried unanimously, it is ordered that the above-entitled Final Report be, and the same is hereby, placed on file. In the Matter of Final Report on Installation of Culverts on Lilac Drive and Mountain Drive, Projects 1909-A, 1909-B, and 1912-A. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the above-entitled Final Report be, and the same is hereby, placed on file. In the Matter of Acceptance of Grant Deed for Consideration of $12,390.00 for Purchase of Undivided l/5th Interest in Tucker's Grove Park Extension, Parcel No. d 1, from Cielito Development Company. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Grant Deed, dated September 25, 1970, from Cielito Development Company, a Corporation, to the County of Santa Barbara, for purchase of undivided l/5th interest in Tucker's Grove Park Extension Parcel No.l, be, and the same is hereby, accepted, prior to recordation by the County Clerk. It is further ordered that the Auditor be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to draw a warrant in the amount of $12,390.00 from Account No. 52-C-3, Capital Outlay Fund, upon the written request of the County Right of Way Agent when said transaction is to close escrow. In the Matter of Execution of Release of All County Claims for Damages to s yCounty Property Resulting from Vehicular Accident, in the Amount of $10.80. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute a Release of all County claims for damages to County property resulting from a vehicular accident, as follows: Herbert A. Criqui Jr., accident on June 15, 1970, damages in the amount of $10.80. It is further ordered that the Director, Department of Resources " Collections be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to deposit the draft received in full settlement therefor to the Road Fund. Release of County In the Matter of Execution of Release of All County Claims for Damages to Claims for Damages County Property County Property Resulting from Vehicular Accident, in the Amount of $53 .46. from Vehicular Acc. in amt. of $53. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and I carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute a Release of all County claims for damages to County property resulting from a vehicular accident, as follows: 142 - Acceptance of Open Space Maintenance Donation, Trac #10,699, Unit in amt. of $90 I Landscaping Bond for $500. Hunt Trailer Park Addition ( Waiver of Phys Requirements 1 Comm. from Mr. it Mrs. David N Kitley re opp. to proposed bi weekly pay pd. system. / October 13, 1970 Dennis Alexander Dewey, accident on June 3, 1970, damages in the Amount of $53 . 46 . It is further ordered that the Director, Department of Resources ~ Collections be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to deposit the draft received in full settlement therefor to the Road Fund In the Matter of Reconnnendation of Administrative Officer for Acceptance of Open Space Maintenance Donation, Tract #10,699, Unit 3, in t he Amount of $909. 00 . Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and .oo. . carried unanimously, it is ordered that the reconnnendation of the Adminis t rative Officer for the acceptance of open space maintenance donation, Tract #10,699, Unit 3, in the amount of $909.00 be, and the same is hereby, confirmed; and the Clerk be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to deposit said draft to the credit of County Service Area No. 3 .In the Matter of Reconnnendation of County Landscape Architect for Place- 0 ' ment of Landscaping Bond, in the Amount of $500. 00, Hunt Trailer Park Addition, (69-CP- 31) Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that a bond, in the amount of $500. 00 be placed to secure performance of the landscaping, .as reconnnended by the County Landscape Architect as well as a cash deposit of $30.00 for the maintenance of two (2) street trees . The bond should contain wording similar to the following: cal ''In consideration of approval by the County Planning Connnission of a Precise Plan of development (Case No. 69-CP-31) for an addition to a trailer park. facility at 4181 State Street, being a portion of Assessor's Parcel No. 61-100-11, Mr. William Hunt hereby agrees to install landscaping within one year from the date of issuance of the final zoning clearance for the trailer park facility and in accordance with the approved landscaping plan dated October 6, 1970 on file with the County Landscape Architect.'' ' In the Matter of Approving Request for Waiver .of PhY-sical Requirements for Prospective Employees, Mental Health Services Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the request for a waiver of the physical requirements for the following prospective employees be, and the same are hereby approved, as reconnnended by Dr. David Caldwell: / Mary Olivas-Mental Health Assistant ;John Powers-Mental Health Assistant In the Matter of Communication from Mr . and Mrs . David N. Kitley in Opposition to Proposed Bi-Weekly Pay Period System. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, s econded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously it is ordered that the above- entitled cormnunication be referred to ' the Administrative Officer. October 13, 1970 Claia against County In the Matter of Claim Against the County fil ed by Os c ar De Castro for by Oscar De Castro for alleged damages. Alleged Damages. 1 Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and Approval of Rider to Oil Drilling Bond. I Pub. of Ordinances Nos. 2118, 2119, ~ 2120. I carried unanimously, it is ordered that the following claim against the County for all eged damages be, and the same is hereby, referred to the County Counsel for rereferral to the County's I nsurance Carrier: Oscar De Castro- $950,000,000.00. In the Matter of Approval of Rider to Oil Dri lling Bond. Pursuant to the request of the County Petroleum Engineer and in accordance with the provisions contained in Ordinance No. 1927; Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Cal lahan , and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the following rider to oil drilling bond be, and the same is hereby approved as to all future acts and conditions : Standard Oil Company- Pacific Indemnity Company, Blanket Bond No . 119594, covering well ''Lakeview Investment Unit 1177, '' County Permit No. 3490. In t he Matt er of Publication of Ordi nances Nos . 2118, 2119 and 2120. It appeari ng from t he Affidavits of Publication of t he Principal Clerk of the Santa Bar bara News -Press that Ordinances Nos . 2118 , 2119 and 2120 have been published i n t he manner and form required by law; Upon mot ion, duly seconded, and ca r ried unanimously , it is determined t hat sai d Ordi nances Nos . 2118 , 2119 and 2120 habe been published in the manner and form required by law. Reports * Communicat ons. In t he Matter of Report s and Communi cati ons . I The following Report s and Communi ca tions were received by the Board and ordered placed on f i le : ning Coaw. Repor s Info. only. I on f i le : I 1) I 4) Admi nis t rative Officer - Travel Report Summary, Sept ember 1- 30 , 1970 . Audi tor- Cont roller - audit of Public Works Dept. , Division of Buildi ng and Saf ety, J uly 1 , 1969 through June 30 , 1970 . Notice Resetting Adjourned Hearing before PUC on investigati on i nto s t a t us , safet y ,mai ntenance , use and protecti on or cl osing of grade cross i ngs over So . Pacific Transportation Co.'s Coast Line in Ci t y of Sant a Barbara , December 9, 1970 , 10 a .m. Mural Room, Cour t house , Santa Barbara. Not i ce of Heari ng befor e PUC on appli cat ion of Golden Wes t Airlines , I nc. for Certif icate of Public Convenience ~ Neces s ity to provide passenger air car rier service t o and from Sant a Mari a Ai rport, October 29, 1970 a t 10 a .m., City Hall , Santa Mari a . U. S. Dept. of I nt eri or, Bur eau of Land ManagementNotice of Classificati on i n Federal Register of approximately 40, 000 acres of public land i n Kern, San Luis Obispo, and Santa Barbara Counties for multi ple use management . In the Matter of Planni ng Commi ssion Reports for I nformation Only. The followi ng reports were received for information only and or dered placed 143 :144 Approval of Tentative Map, Tract 11,225 located approx 500 ft. wes.ter of Kingston on the south side of Calle Real " adjacent to Highway 101. I Approval of Tentative Map, Tract 11, 174 located aJlprox 400 ft. northeasterly of N. Kellogg Ave. I ; l) October 13, 1970 Granted Conditional Use Permit on request of Buellton Investors and A. T. Petersen .(70-CP- 35) to allow mobile honre park on property located on the South side of the Buellton-Lompoc Road, easterly of Calor Drive, Buellton. Set public hearing, October 14, 1970, on request from Board of Supervisors for initiation of an Ordinance amending Ordinance 661 rezoning from the A-1-X to the 8-R-l on property generally l ocated at the southeast corner of Fairview Avenue and Cathedral Oaks Road, Goleta (70-RZ-81) In the Matter of Recommendation of Planning Commission for approval of Tentative Map, Tract 11,225, generally located approximately 500 feet westerly of y Kingston Avenue on the pouth ~ide of Calle Real and adjacent to Highway 101, 3rd District . Upon motion of Supervisor Gr.ant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the matter be continued to October 26, 1970 on request of applicant, Michael Towbes, Cal-Real Properties. In the Matter of Recommendation of Planning Commission for approval of Tentative Map, Trac~ 11,174, generally located approximately 400 feet nor~heasterly of North Kellogg Avenue, 3rd District. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carunanimously, it is ordered that said Tentative Map be approved in accordance with the recommendation made by the ,_Planning Commission. Conditional Ex In the Matter of Recommendation of Planning Commission to grant Conditional ception reques ed . by Alfred H. Exception, subject to conditions, on request of Alfred H. Constans (70-V-50) for use Constans (70-V 50)for use of of trailer as dwelling for farm help on property generally located between Santa Ynez trailer as dwelling on River and Meadowlark area approximately 1 mile southeasterly from Santa Ynez Airport, property in Santa Ynez are Santa Ynez. I Overtime payment for emp loyeea of Fir Dept. f Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that conditional exception be granted as recommended by Planning Commission. In the Matter of Recommendation of Administrative Officer ' s recommendation of payment of overtime for employees of Fire Department . Mr . Raymond Johnson, the Administrative Officer, stated that the overtime payment would amount to somewhere between $35,000 and $40,000. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Administrative Officer's recommendation be approved. Awarding of Bi In the Matter of Awarding Bid for Construction of Road, Parking Lots and for Constructi n of Rd., Parkin Grading of Los Alamos Park, Santa Barbara County, California. Lota " Grading of Loa Alamos The Affidavit of Publication being on file with the Clerk; the following Park, S.B. Co1U11ty bids were opened at a meeting held on October 8, 1970, in the Clerk's Office at the Santa Maria County Office Building; the roll was called, and representatives of the following departments were present : Public Works; and the County Clerk's Office: October 13, 1970 Jerry Howard Construction Co . A. J. Diani Construction Co. C. Sanchez Sons M. J. Hermreck, Inc. Madonna Construction Co. Arthur Q. Evans Antonio Sanchez and Tony Sanchez, a Joint Venture $10,848 .00 $12,082.00 $10,170. 50 $13,274.50 $16,500.00 $12,950.00 $ 8 ,397.50 It appearing that the bid of Antonio Sanchez and Tony Sanchez, Inc., A Joint Venture, is the lowest and best bid received from a responsible bidder, and 145 that said bid is satisfactory and in accordance with the notice i nviting bids for said Res. increasing Buil - ing Official's Revolving Fund rescinding Res. 22351. I project; Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the bid of Antonio Sanchez and Tony Sanchez, Inc., A J oi nt Venture, in the amount of $8,397.50 be accepted, and that the contract for said project be awarded to the said contractor from Account 52 C 2, at the price and upon the terms and conditions set forth in said bid and in said notice inviting bids . It is further ordered that the Director of Public Works be, and he is hereby, aut horized and directed to prepare the necessary contract for the work; and the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute same . In the Matter of Resolution increasing Bui lding Official's Revolving Fund from $500 t o $2000 and rescinding Resolution 22351. (Director of Public Works) Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, the following resol ution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO . 70-633 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) (See minutes of October 19, 1970 meeting rescinding this action Req. by City of In the Matter of City of Santa Barbara's requesting Board's authorization .B. for auth. t . eposit $37,500. Ofor deposit of $37,500.00 approved as County's share toward purchase of property in toward purchase of prop. in Rattlesn kt attlesnake Canyon addition to Skofield Park. Canyon add. to Skofi ld Park. (County's aha e) I roposed expansion o CSAC Directorships- John Hamilton appeared to commend the Board on their commitment. Mike Pahos, City Park Director, appeared t o state assurance of the City of Santa Barbara's support. Upon motion of Supervisor Callahan, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the auditor deposit the amount of $37,500.00 in escrow as soon as notification is received to do so. In the Matter of proposed expansion of CSAC Directorships - Superviso~ upervisor Grant. Grant. / Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that t his matter be continued for one week, at the request of Supervisor Grant . 146 Report on reg. concerning pa ment of rent for Welfare recipients. I Possible reestablishment of Com. to Study Wildfire Threat ic Eval Needs for Fut te e. I Grant Deed ic Right of Way Contract to State Div. of Highways for conatr. of ove - crossing at Alvin St, and relocation of Bradley Ditch. I October 13, 1970 In the Matter of Report from Administrative Officer on regulations concerning payment of rent for Welfare recipients . A report received from Administrative Officer Johnson explained why the Welfare Department could not comply with the Lompoc Valley Board of Realtors request for payment of Welfare recipients rent directly to the realtor agent on behalf of the landlord. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that a copy of Mr . Johnson's l~tter, containing said report, to be sent to the Lompoc Valley Board of Realtors, and that the report be filed . In the Matter of report relative to possible reestabl ishment of Connnittee to Study Wildfire Threat and Evaluate Needs for Future . In a letter, Fire Chief Victor L. Mohr, stated that since the Coyote Fire, great strides have been taken by the fire service in the field of fire prevention. A few years ago, work was started on a fire prevention ordinance dealing with development in high fire hazard areas. The last meeting on the matter was in April 1969. It is the feeling of the Fire Chief that work should be continued as soon as possible on the ordinance as it would be a great benefit to all concerned. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that a committee be reconstituted or reappointed similar to that committee which previously had made studies of fire hazard problems in this area, and that Chief Mohr's letter be filed . It is further ordered that each Board member be supplied with a copy of Mr . Mohr's letter; and it is also further ordered that a copy of said letter be sent to the Planning Department and County Counsel . In the Matter of Grant Deed and Right of Way Contract, conveying in fee, certain area to State Division of Highways for construction of overcrossing at Alvin Street, 5th District, and relocation of Bradley Ditch. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Grant Deed be executed and, it is fur ther ordered that it be referred to Flood Control and Water Conservation District and be executed by that Board. Corta St. Pare 1 In the Matter of Corta Street Parcel Disposal, Goleta Valley . (Assessor's Diepoaal, Gole a Valley. Parcel No. 71-182-14) A letter was received from the Road Commissioner recommending that sale of subject parcel be held in abeyance until a new route for Fairview Avenue around the east end of the Airport is selected and approved inasmuch as subject parcel may be required as road right of way . Planning Commission action on this matter revealed that there is insufficient evidence to act at this time; and as soon as additional information is received from interested County Departments, the Planning Commission will respond. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that this matter be held in abeyance as recommended by the Road Commissioner until a new route for Fairview Avenue around the east end of the Airport is selected and approved. October 13, 1970 Extension of Crop In the Matter of Recommendation of Director of Parks to allow for extension Lea1e Agreement bet. County* Mr . P.R. of Crop Lease Agreement between the County and Mr. P . R. Pinoli for growing of hay at Pinoli for growing h y at County Fara. County Farm. I Req. of U.C.S.B. Rec Dept. for peraiesion to hold sailing regatta at Cach11ma Lak Nov. 27 28, 1970 I Noa. of Donal F. Sweeney, M.D. to comm. to study rules * reg. of Air Poluti Control District. I Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie and seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that this matter be referred to County Counsel to prepare the necessary documents. In the Matter of Uirector of Parks Recommendation for approval on request of u . c . s .B. Recreation Department for permission to hpld sailing regatta at Cachuma Lake, November 27th and 28th, 1970, from 10 a .m. until dusk. n Upon moti on of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that request of u . c . s .B. Recreation Dept . be granted . In the Matter of Santa Barbara County Tuberculosis and Health Association nomination of Donal F. Sweeney, M. D. , to committee to study rules and regulati ons of Air Pollution Control District . :147 I There were letters read by the Clerk suggesting membership on the commi.ttee, namely, Ward Peterson, Ronald H. Stern, Ruben S. Ayala, and Deneen, and from San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors about the implementation of AB 83 and ''basin'' studies . Chairman Clyde, referring to an October 6th letter from Marc McGinnes, suggested that the Community Environmental Council be included in the list of organizations to be represente~ in the preparation of rules and regulations of the Distri ct. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the letters be filed and the matter be continued for two weeks . Approval of Final Ma , In the Matter of Recommendation for approval of Final Map, Tract 10,699, Tract 10,699, Unit 3 located at the north Unit 3, located at the northwest corner of Fairview Avenue and Cathedral Oaks Road, w corner of Fairv ew Ave. * Cahtedral 3rd District . Oaks Rd. I C*a . Assoc. of Weight Measures Officials Election of S.B. Cou Sealer Jaaes Wiley a V.P. for 1971. / A letter was received from the Surveyor staFipg that the map is correct; that notices had been given by all affected departments and agencies; that their requirements had been satisfied and all bonds and cash deposits received. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Fina~ Map. o~ Tract 10,699, Unit 3 be and the same is hereby approved. In the Matter of California Associations of Weights and Measures Officialst J lection of Santa Barbara County Sealer James Wiley as Vice President for 1971. Upon motion of Supervisor Callahan, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the notice of the election of J ames Wiley as Vice President for 1971 of California Association of Weights and Measures be filled . Req. from bus. In the Matter of Requests from certain business owners, Isla Vista, for owners in l.V. to reopen certain stree s reopening of certain Isla Vista streets which were closed to motor vehicle traffic on closed to motor veh. traffic by 1.v.c.c. request of the I . v . c . c . 148' October 13, 1970 The Road Department at the request of I . v . c . c . has placed barricades at the end of Pardall and Picasso Streets to deny access from Camino Pescadero in order to give students a bicycle path and pedestrian footpath . These two streets are con- , sidered to be the major entrances into the campus area. The following persons appeared in favor of removal of the barricades: Tim Brady of Brady's Ice Cream Parlor, located on Pardall. Claims that dangerous ''U'' turns now being made in intersection, motorcycles still continue up and down street at . will . Business down 35% over same time last year. Carol Hoag, owner of Little Hobo Drive- In, claimed business off 20% due to closure of street . Barbara Simmons also stated that she felt the barricades were affecting business on Pardall although she is not in business on that street . Warren Prentice , manager of the Isla Vista Market, stated that business has dropped off already because of other problems and now they have another problem to face, namely, closi ng of the street . His biggest complaint seemed to be that he was not consulted before the barricades were put up . Mr . Prentice gave letters to Mr. Grant signed by students who were not in favor of the barricades . The following persons appeared in favor of continuance of barricades: Jon Wheatley, member of I .v.c.c . , explained the background of the matter. There were two public meetings . Merchants had not been notified but they should have been aware of thi s . A 60 - 90 day experi1aental _i;.criod waq tequcsted to t est affect on business . If business adversely affected, then barricades would be removed. Dr . Wheatley believes ttat business has been adversely affected by riots, not by barricades . He submitted petitions favoring barricades . Mr. Grant asked if this matter could be put on next Monday's agenda of the I . v . c . c . and Dr . Wheatley replied that it could be placed on the October 19th agenda . Dr . Wheatley felt that the supermarket may have lost business due to Co-op starting up on campus rather than to barricades. The I . v . c . c . would agree to barriers being up until Christmas . Others speaking in favor of barricades were : Leon J acobson, resident of Isla Vi s t a; Mike Salerno, a student; and Bruce Macvicar, owner of small business on Pardall . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that these petit ions be referred to the I . v . c . c . to be considered at their next regular meeting, that they consider the time limit for experiment, and report back to the Board of Supervisors on October 26th. 6 Protest lett f roa Loapoc ci re rerouting o Highway 1 over Harris Grade b Loapoc " Santa I rs izens rerouting t. Maria. In the Matter of Six (6) protest letters from Lompoc citizens relative to of Highway 1 over Harris Grade between Lompoc and Santa Maria . October 13,1970 Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that copies of these letters be sent to the Road Commissioner and the letters be filed 149 Req. that Buellt n In the Matter of Buellton Businessmen's Association request that Buellton Parkway be renamed '-'The Avenue of Flags '. Parkway be renamed ''The Avenue of Flags''. / Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that this _request be referred to the Road and Planning departments for report and recolillllendation Application by Stand rd In the Matter of Application by Standard Oil Co. of California, for permit Oil of Ca. for perai to conduct explorato y to conduct exploratory drilling within OCS Parcels 0204, 0207, 2008 and 0210 (Tracts _4rilling within OCS P.arce~s 0204, 0207, 352, 359, 360 and 362) off Santa Barbara and Ventura Counties. 2008, 0210, off S. B " Ventura Counties. County Counsel George Kading acknowledged that the ''usual letter'' had been / Cancellation of Tax Deed 41 (1970) re prop. acquired by State of Ca. for Highway purposes. . J ( I sent by his office on this matter. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that this application be filed In the Matter of Cancellation of Tax Deed Number 41 (1970) Relative to Property acquired by the State of California for Highway Purposes. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, the following Order was passed and adopted: IN THE MATTER OF CANCEIJ.ATION OF TAX DEED NUMBER 41 (1970) RELATIVE TO PROPERTY ACQUIRED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR HIGHWAY PURPOSES. ORDER ~ WHEREAS, on July 1, 1970 property described as Assessor's Parcel Number 111-240-23 was deeded to the State of California for nonpayment of taxes; and WHEREAS, it now appears that this property was acquired by the State of California for highway purposes on October 5, 1964 and procedures were not initiated by the State at that time under Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4986 to clear taxes which were then delinquent; and WHEREAS, subsequent to October 5, 1964 subject property was carried as not assessed, with the prior year's delinquency remaining outstanding; and WHEREAS, on August 17, 1970 the Board of Supervisors ordered cancellation of a proportionate share of these taxes and transfer of the remaining amount to the unsecured tax roll, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Auditor-Controller and/or Tax Collector of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California, be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to cancel tax deed number 41 (1970) now outstanding, pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4991. The foregoing Order entered in the Minutes of the Board of Supervisors this 13th day of October, 1970. J. E. LEWIS (SEAL) County Clerk 150 October 13, 1970 Co-. froa CSA In the Matter of communication from CSAC relative to change in Property re change in Prop. Tax Asse s-Tax Assessment appeals process: SB 122- Nejedly . ment appeals p ecess: SB 122-N jedly. Upon mot ion of Supervisor Beatti e, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and / Res. of Napa County B/S to terminate " ''Opting Out'' participation County in act. of the Napa County Council for Econ. 01( Co-. froa Janin Prop. Owners Assoc. re hazardous traffic cond. on Janin Acres I Report on insu cash in County Gen. Fun4i to aeet current op. expenses for last 2 ao. of calen4iar yr I carried unanimously, it is ordered that this communication be placed on file . In the Matter of Napa County Board of Supervisors Resolut ion electing to terminate and ''Opting Out'' participat ion by County in activities of the Napa Count y y Council for Economic Opportunity . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously , it is ordered that this matter be placed on f i le In the Matter of communication from J anin Property Owners Association concerning hazardous traffic conditi ons on Janin Acres Road. (Supervi sor Grant - after agenda item) d. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that letter and petition be referred to Road Dept . for recommendation. f icient In the Matter of Auditor- Controller and County Treasurer ' s report on insufficient cash in County General Fund to meet current operation expenses for last 2 months of calendar year. In a joint report of County Auditor Albert T. Eaves, J r . , and Count y Treasurer Edward A. McMillan, reasons were s t at ed for there bei ng i nsuffici ent f unds to meet current operating expenses for the last two months of the calendar year . Mr. Eaves pointed out that there had been a great drain on the fund as a result of unexpected expenditures such as the Isla Vista riots and inasmuch as revenue from property taxes will not be forthcoming until November and December, it will be necessary to borrow money from a bank to finance operations until the County ' s first tax monies are received. Supervisor Callahan stated that he had voted against adoption of the budget last July and reminded fellow supervisors that he had warned that this very situation could happen because of anticipation of revenue that did not materialize . Colonel Temple, executive secretary of the Santa Barbara County Taxpayers Association, pointed out that if the Board had accepted some of the association' s suggestions, there would be no need to borrow money . He urged the Board to refrain from filling vacancies and study automobile mileage of the county cars . Mr . Eaves and Mr . McMillan asked that a resolution be adopted authorizing a loan of $3,500,000. 00 . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carCounsel ried unanimously, it is ordered that his matter be referred to the County/to prepare the necessary resolutions . The Board recessed until 2 o'clock p .m 151 October 13, 1970 At two o'clock, p .m., the Board reconvened. Present : Supervisors George H. Clyde, Joe J. Callahan, Daniel G. Grant, Req. for Appropriati Cancellation or Revi of Funds. I llowance of Claims. I earing on appeal of r. Eugene Aiches fro cona. impose 011 )Planning co. appro f dev. plan (70-M-88 for office building, Goleta. / Hearing on Macco Co req.' re portions of Hollister Ranch, Go I Francis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell. Supervisor Clyde in the Chair. n, In the Matter of Requests for Appropriation, Cancellation or Revision of ion Funds. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, the following requests for appropriation, cancellation or revision of funds are hereby approved, in the budget classifications and amounts shown, and the Auditor be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to make the necessary transfers : Transfer from 37 B 10 the sum of $160, Public Works General Fund Transfer from various funds to the Employees Retirement Fund, the sum of $188,009.61. In the Matter of Allowance of Claims. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, it is ordered that the following clajms be, and the same are hereby allowed, each claim for the amount and pay.able out of the fund designated on the face of each claim, respectively, to-wit: (Claims List) (See page 152) In the Matter of Hearing on appeal of Dr. Eugene Aiches from conditions imposed on Planning Commission approval of development plan (70-M-88) for office al building, Goleta. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the request of applicant for continuance of one week was granted. he In the Matter of the Hearing on Macco Corporation (Rancho Santa Barbara) t equests relative to portions of the Hollister Ranch, Gaviota: a) Rezoning of certain portions from 100-AL-O to 100-AL-0-PC and BD and time limit for occupancy of ''cabinas ''. b) Issuance of Conditional Use Permit (70-CP- 33) and time limit for occupancy of camping sites. Mr. Divelbiss, Planning Director, outlined Planning Commission's action of October 7, 1970 on Board of Supervisors' referral of matter. He concured with 180 day limit within any twelve month period and that there be an annual review of the conditional use permit . He was less concerned with the term of occupancy but more concerned with possible school enrollment which would evidence that terms of conditional use was being violated. Mr. Grant expressed his concern with occupancy limit, feeling that a pro- 1.52 October 13, 1970 ., . . - NUMBER I ,., NII 9111 . , . , ., . ,. 1111 111.I 1111 1111 ttll ., , .\C l 5 1 - ' I , . , AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER . . PAYEE PURPOSE . time . ~ ,_,a.lN ., . ," .i llllr&l&L .,_ HllMlr - .ii 1ruu. , . a.a . t . _ . . \ SYMBO L 1 a II J a II taD 10812 u.au uaw UaD 11 * uaw uau uau uau . MM 4lel.Aa .,_. 17aU . ,_ 178D ~ . U,Mlaa--r I.AW I.A n L~ ( . JI a II WARRANT ALLOWED F OR . 118 u.1 . 11.n . 117 111 . . ,. 1 . 11.11 . U.H . ,., 11.21 l.U. , , . SM.II 40.10 , 47.11 s.oo . ., . u., , , . 1 . . ' R EMARKS n . NUMBER A C15 J ., - ' AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER . PAYEE c ~ 10. . . . ' SANTA BARBARA COUNTY - ----'-----L.DATE,_ . \. . ' PURPOSE SYMBOL . asa n t7D WARRANT ALLOWED FOR Lit , . 11.0D u.11 . ., , . I REMARKS . . NUMBER M71 . ,. ' ,. NW ,. . Mil . . . . . ., . . . Nil . .,. . . - -- ,, - 9111 AC-157 I .f ' AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER , SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PAYEE PURPOSE . .,. . - $ n . il ~ I . . a., Wl 1rl.1Uiill .ui, WIUUaL Mll _. at.,. lslJweel ~ .-. . . u . . --.i W:UU.a . . . . . - . SYMBOL . u 1018 I 1. - - , u wan . I . , ll a II , I.OJ. ll uea1 wt uoan , . ,_., Ulaa . ., , ,,. _ . . Ut . . .11.11.1.1tl.l n WARRANT ALLOWED FOR "" . ,. . .,.u -.11 . '-- s.w . . eM.lO . ' REMARK.S 111. u u lM.11 ti. . . . . . 81.;U u.,. ue .- . , . . ' u lSO. ______ J NUMBER tlla . nu . . llf tua IAt llU. HU . 1111 ., .' . 1111 NJ1 . 1111 91Jt . "-" tMl , Hll .\ClBJ ' AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER . . ' f SANTA BARBARA COUNTY FUND _ _.:.=.==~..;__----~ATE PAYEE PURPOSE SYMBOL . 1 ueaia . , . 11aaa .~.&.a.-.i. a&W . ., ' ~---- . , Miil-cat -.tai--- .u. . wuua.i-. _ . ,11& _ o , .i-u -iJ-.u.--. . ,. ~- . . -.-~,. .- - . __. . ' ~- . _ . _. 61.W . . - . oi . . . ' WARRANT ALLOWED FOR , . DO.to . ,. . . r . U. . . M-.se . . 711.t u . u . . . . . n.11 , . s . ,. tlL . n. n. I . ' REMARKS 7 ' , ' AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANTA BARBARA COUNTY NUMBER I PAYEE PURPOSE SYMBOL I WARRANT ALLOWED FOR REMARKS .\C-157 NUMBER . . , -. - . . -., - - . tlU . MU MM tUI . MlY . . . . . AC I !57 - . ,. . ' . ' AUDITOR'S WAR.RANT .REGISTER PAYEE . -.w . :Cdll._ '.a, . - u u .s. , Cd&-. - - . SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PURPOS.E ,/ - : t SYMBOL ID ID wau uaat , UlaU 111 au . , . ~ . - ._ . . . . . . . u.w. . . . . . . . - - 1 u, "'' WARRANT ALLOWED FOR . U.IO . - .ft u.u . .I I REMARKS , . -.u u . . M. USaMH.IO \ l . u. . . . . . . us .~' t- t uran.1.1. ' . . b - . . . . ' AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER J SANT A BARBARA COUNTY FUND__.= .--=.--._; __ ___- -'JATE It. U7e I NUMBER PAYEE PURPOSE SYMBOL ALWLOAWRERDA NFTO R REMARKS . OllMllJ. lHSU in . ~- Mil -- at.a tlll ~ . ., ,. ~ . --- &Ha II SY.ft . , u.a , . . . . . 11 . ., . n. US-WJ.llili n~M IMl . Ula . ., . ma.t. . . . tM4 l&ll J.ftll . . ~ . U.lt . , . . , ._IMW_ . M7. IOI ClllWl 117. 11 Olp.U n~ . , ,,. ~ . "*~ LIO hi.Ml . . . 71_.;. ., __ . ia . . ., . a.11 l.lilllr' . .a. - 271.D . . 1-. ~ 1t1.n ,. . . .w. . . 117.AJ , iu . -- a. U7.ll ._._. -e-t .-.- 117.M s . - 11.u AC 1~7 AUDITOfl'S WARRANT REGISTER SANT A BARBARA COUNTY u.1m FUND, ________ __.,DATE _____ _ NUMBER ,. 1171. ,. ,. ,. ,. ".,.", .",".' . Mil - Mtl . . . , . ., PAYEE . .s. . --~ ' .a. . . . ~llMd --~ ~ lld . . . . ., a . ,j ., . -.1 , . - - . .,. ~, -. - , .,.i , AC-I !57 . 1,. PURPOSE f . SYMBOL 111 IJ. , - . WARRANT ALLOWED FOR u. a.a . , ., . ., . . , . W.M m. .,. , 1, . ., aw.is . , ., . . Q:.R ., . , . n.M us.ts ., M. . . ~ . . . 2.-. . l : REMARKS .IJ.I .a.a. ' NUMBER IJlt 9111 nu WM 1716 ., ,.,. . nu .,. ., nu .,. .,., ., . .,. '711 ma m .,. .,. .,m .,. "11 IMI ., . . .,., .,. .\C-1:01 ' AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER I PAYEE .-s, ~ . . ailf&i . . -.u . U. Ill . , . u. . . &Mllilil WW .a . Gil* . . . . . , . . wwJ ' . IMiMMl Dlliit-& _._ SANTA BARBA.RA COUNTY =--- - --.AJATE . ., . . \ ' PURPOSE I SYMBOL man - . UlaU . 1 au _ ,U . ~ Tr. . - _ . "' Q Wiie . &t. a.a - . . .u. ., WARRANT ALLOWED FOR u.n "" w . u1.11 ,. . tt.H . 7 n.11 , . . . . . . ,-. ." 1 11 11 . u . ., ,. . ,. . - . ., . . . . 111 . 111 . OJI i . . ., REMARKS .,. ' NUMBER I ' nu ., . ,. .,., ., .,. .,. ., , ,. mi na .',',',' \ . '\C-15'1 AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER 1 PAYEE . ="' . llalftSM Cel, IMlll Ila r ~ . .-!.!~. -~-- __ , SANTA BARBARA COUNTY --!.---'--'---"----i.DATE PURPOSE . , ' ~ I SYMBOL U4aU .'.' ' . - 17' ,.,. n . ldlt aw ~c f'\tCA- . . ltlIJ u~ f u. "'' WARRANT ALLOWED FOR ., . 111.00 , . UN u. u . , 11 U.IO n.11 11.u . ,.1, ' , a. . an u . REMARKS . ' 11. 7. It a II ll.'8 ' . , . Mf.11 C* B . AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANT A BARBARA COUNTY FUND _ _ NUMBER I PAYEE PURPOSE SYMBOL WARRANT ALLOWED FOR REMARKS . 011 . _ i . 11/79 1au ll I a IA Ml.11 a 9a 1' llM UIA 1.U DM a.n at a IA . ,. &aaM JA nau IA.a 11 11.a . . 1'aM llaM ft.&I UlaM . - JA 11t.a &Mau 1.UaJA '' lltaM u . &DaM 111.a 1198.M Ill a M , . 1111 M UtaM Ul.et tM M . u NUMBER ., ,. , . . . .,. . ' \ C-15 '1 . AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER ,_ '-.! '\, ' t PAYEE ' .-.--- -- . -.-. _ . . .u1 . . " . . ' ,SA.tilTA BARBARA COUNTY I PURPOSE .,. . . . . o-i-n, ._,. . . . . ' . . . . SYMBOL . s Me . 11.1 WARRANT ALLOWED FOR - . . , u.-.' . . . REMARKS \ M92a 11.11 1--UI . ' - . . AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER FUNDNUMBER PAYEE - . - ., .,. . .,._n ,. .,. . . ~ .,. . ' -' , . ' SANT A BARBARA COUNTY I ' .J PURPOSE . . . . . . , . . SYMBOL IMU . ' -- . . . . WARRANT ALLOWED FOR . ' . . . , Rldl . lllM 111. Ut.11* sea.ts 111.1 .2.~ -. 1 lt.tS* . . ., , . , . REMARKS -- . ' ' - . , i f . ~ , , I -- . - . AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER ' . ' NUMBER PAYEE --- - llialW. - 1114-.1 - . 7 - 1, . llft , , , . ~ ,. a,. . . ., " - ". - .,., aM a a . 1IUl.lilili&. . ._. . WUWila --.u. - . -. . uaa aillllie . ,. ~ . . . . . . e. ~ . u ~ . ~ -.u. SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PURPOSE SYMBOL M&l - uaa ae di& All , ID& &. l 'a ., . . k ' \c.1n1 WARRANT ALLOWED FOR . , . u . 111.17 .,. .'. " u . . u.u . u . . u . . , . u . . a. 11.n . ,. . ., tit.le 11t.11 ~ Ul.11 .-. Dl.M . . REMARKS 11&1 MllU.M ,18.1. H .I. , AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER ' SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ' . ' . l~N-UM-BER~l:.~-------PA-YE_E_ ________,~ ----P-U-RP_o_sE----~!---sY_M_so_L~l, __A_ L~_t_~-~~-N_l-cR~l~---R-EM_A_RKs--~ Cllirillil* ueas Ill.II uM . - ., .,. . . .,. 114.U . , 1 . .a. .,. -- ---- uea . a.,, eul-- IA . . '* ., . ,. a 9Jll nLD aeni . ,., . 1' ma 111.U WU . IJIA . &l.U . 6.,. wu.u ._ U9&l ., .,. :i.C-15 7 . - \'" . ' ).1 ' AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANTA BARBARA COUNTY . , ' . FUND pp,a _ _______ .,DATE_ NUMBER I .C -1 !l7 - PAYEE ' '- , ~ \ ., ' . ' .' . I' '"4 I ' " f . . " . ' ' . . . ~ I 4 f ' . . - PURPOSE SYMBOL \ 1171 WARRANT ALLOWED FOR 71-18-)J , u . 4.411.SI u ., . ., 111.es , ,., . . . It.ts 11.2 , , ., ~ ., . REMARKS ( , \__. ' NUMBER I . ~ AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER ' PAYEE SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ___ __ -AJATE PURPOSE SYMBOL WARRANT ALLOWED FOR ltt. REMARKS ( - , ' . NUMBER I PAYEE AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ~ FUND 8'Ja.W:;__~~~~~~~LDATE.~~ .1~1 ' . --~-- -------- PURPOSE SYMBOL WARRANT ALLOWED FOR REMARKS L I I t October 13, 1970 spective purchaser might be misled into thinking that he was entitled to ermanent residency. Mr. Grant asked Mr. Allen how this would be spelled out in deed with respective purchaser. Mr. George H. Allen, appearing for M.G.T.C. Investment Program, M.G.I.C. 153 Equities, who acquired property recently from Macco Corporation, stated that the units would be available for sublease in a rental pool eith the understanding that the pro- spec-tive purchaser would have the units available for sub-lease period similar to hotel service. He gave examples of the type of persons who might be interested in such an arrangement, i.e., college teacher for a 4 month vacation; or weekend users for weekends and vacation time which would add up to approximately the 180 day limit. Mr. Clyde wondered if this was not a device to sell a subdivision of up to 200 homes. He stated that these units were being compared to a cottage type hotel, yet here the buildings are being sold. A hotel owns its building. Therefore, why cannot this be operated as a hotel, if it is to be compared as such. Mr. Allen claimed that he never called it a hotel; the Planning staff called it this. Mr. Callahan asked about M.G.I.C. specifically , inasmuch as we are no longer dealing with Macco. Mr. Allen explained that M.G.I.C. is a publicly held corporation on the New York Stock Exchange, a large insurer of mortgages, and a fairly widespread conglomerate with interest in real estate and mortgage guarantee business. The property in question was acquired as an investment. Mr. Callahan asked what recourse is available to lessee if project should become insolvent. Mr. Allen replied that trailer unit could be removed and contractual lease rights against lessor could be enforced. The following persons appeared in opposition to the rezoning in this matter: Mrs. James Higman, a concerned citizen of Santa Barbara County, stated that she was appalled and dismayed at the naivete:of Mr. Allen in his plans for leasing and subleasing the property. If a person buys any kind of home or trailer he is not about to let someone else move in periodically. When there are 65 conditions, something is wrong. The road access should be resolved first and the two state agencies (State Division of Highways, and State Division of Parks and Recreation) work out their problem first. She further stated that she had not heard the water supply problem discussed. The Hollister ranch had tried to develop water without success. Mr. Grant asked Mr. Divelbiss when vehicular access would be provided and Mr. Divelbiss replied that this matter would be satisfied before any occupancy is granted and this would include before sewer lines, water plant , foundations, etc . ,' were installed. This is understood under condition 46 of Conditional Use Permit. Phillip Marking, vo~unteer counsel for Los Padres Chapter of Sierra Club, appeared and spoke in regard to occupancy restriction in condition #65 . He objected to the manner in which wording of condition evolved from recent Planning Commission meeting. He would like to see penalty spelled out if restriction is violated, and stated that restrictions are unclear and ambiguous 1.54 October 13, 1970 Mr. Grant stated that he felt Mr. Marking ' s statement was quite appropriate at this time, and asked if the Planning Commjssion had considered this . Mr. Mitchell, deput y county counsel, replied that there was discussion of this . Ultimately, the County ' s only legal recourse would be i njunction agains t M.G. I . C. The Developer i s willing to enter into contract wi th County . Mr . Marking felt that the practical solution was t he Planning staff ' s suggestion that the ''cabinas'' be rented and not sold. Mr . Fred Stei nitz, a concerned cit izen, read a letter and submitted same . He requested same time limi t as for s t ate parks . He cit ed all kinds of t hings that could happen if this development goes t hrough. He felt that precedent was grecedent was being set as to future demands for county services . . Dr . Kalon Kelly urged acceptance of 30 days maximum continuous occupancy suggested by Planning staff . He fele that the Planning Commission failed to get at what would happen in annual review if future Planning Commissions should disagree with what earlier Commissions had approved. This could raise legal problems . Mr. Fred Eissler of Scenic Shorelines stated that the road issue is a cr ucial one and that under the State Cortstitution beach access should be avail able to the public . He referred to the Dunlap Act which applies to subdivisions . Mr . Allen stated thatthe question of enforcement .and language of this particular condition actually could be sai d about granting any conditional use permit . As to water supply, Mr . Allen stated that they have furnished Public Works and the Health departments with det ailed infromation on this and they have been satisfied with what they have found . Before any construction is made full tests will be made of availability of necessary amount of water. As to road access, legal right to this is a matter of public record. No problem exists as long as road can be developed in location suitable to State Division of Beaches and Parks . Mr . Grant stated that if this project is approved as now recoonnended, the developer will have to sell as many units as he can to develop a cash flow . Before long we will be faced with 200 people who will be placing us in a very embarrassing position . They will be in saying what they want done and the County Board will be held responsible . He asked why we could not go back to the staff recommendations that this be clearly rental and everyone wili be able to see exactly what the conditions are . Mr . Allen stated that the sale of "cabinas '' will be only when they are available . Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that a zoning ordinance be adopted as submitted and amended relative to paragraph 65 of the conditions, on condition that the developer will enter into a contract with the County to permit the ordinance to be reviewed annually and changed at such time as need be Upon roll call, Supervisor Clyde, Grant and Callahan voted no and the motion failed Condition (b) - It was pointed out that inasmuch as the Conditional Use Permit was not to be effective until the rezoning had been accomplished, that the foregoing vote rendered the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit moot . Attorney Allen stated that he felt that the Board's vote would not preclude Oriiaaace Ne. 212lMacce Cerp.- aezoai a 155 October 13, 1970 further referral to the Planning CoIIllllission for modifaction . He hated to see the project ''go down the tubes'' and suggested deletion of references to the sale of cottage type ''cabinas '' and that they be referred to only as planned commercial development. Supervisor Clyde objected to the negotiating of the appl icant's request in this manner, inasmuch as up until now the sale of ''cabinas ' ' was essential . Supervisor Grant stated that he could suppor t the applicant if the sale of the cabinas was eliminated from their request. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie , seconded by Supervisor Tunnell and carried, it is ordered that the action j ust taken be rescinded . Supervisors Callahan and . Clyde voted no . At 4:10 p .m. the chairman declared a 5 minute recess . At 4 :15 the Board reconvened. Present : Supervisors George H. eli de, Joe J. Callahan, Daniel G. Grant., Francis H Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell. SuEervisor Clyde in Chair Supervisor Grant stated that he felt that occupancy should be limited to ' 90 days in any 12 month period and that there should be no sale of cabinas. Attorney Allen stated that the appl icant would go .along with such a request and did not wish to withdraw the rezpning application. Supervisor Clyde asked if it would be acceptable to the applicant to apply the same 90 day limit to the Conditional Use Permit . Attorney Allen replied that it would be . Deputy county counsel Mitchell stated that only conditions 61 and 65 of the ordinance are affected and that these can be put into final form for adoption next week. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carr ied, it is ordered that the recommendation of the Planning Commission to adopt an ordinance amending Article EV of Ordinance No . 661 of the County of Santa Barbara, as amended, by adding Sections 654 and 655, rezoning certain portions of the Macco Corporation (now MGIC) property in the Hollister Ranch area (70~RZ-34) from 100-AL-0 to the 100-AL-O-PC, Planned CoIIllllercial and BD-Beach Development Districts with conditions n11mher 61 and 65 amended to prohibit sale of the ''cabinas" and to limit occupancy to a period of no more than 90 days in any 12 month period be and the same is hereby confirmed. It is understood that the developer agrees to enter into an agreement with the County of Santa Barbara to amend the or dinance, if necessary, on an annual basis . Supervisor Callahan announced that he would vote no for the reason that I there were too many unanswered questions regarding water, sewage, road and beach access~ school attendance, etc. and that he still remembered Rancho Embarcadero. It is further ordered that the Board passed and adopted the following or~ dinance: In the Matter of Ordinance No. 2123- An Ordinance Amending Ordinance No . 661 of the County of Santa Barbara, as Amended, by Adding Section 654 and Section 655 to Article IV of Said Ordinance . Upon the roll being called, the following Supervisors voted Aye, to-wit: , '.156 Req. for Jrc party intervention in Current Salary Negotiations. / October 13, 1970 George H. Clyde, Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell NOES: Joe J. Callahan ABSENT: None The Board then proceeded to consider the issuance of the Conditional Use Permit (70-CP-33) and time limit for the occupancy of the camping and trailer spaces. Planning Director Divelbiss urged the Board to continue this matter for one week to allow for redrafting of the Permit to include the same occupancy conditions that now exist in the zoning. Attorney Allen urged action at this time incorporating the 90 day occupancy provision. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie and carunanimously, it is ordered that the same occupancy limits be placed on the trailer camps as on the cabinas, and that the Planning Department staff and the County Counsel be directed to amend the general conditions of the Conditional Use Permit accordingly and report back to the Board of Supervisors at 2:00 p.m. Monday, October 19, 1970, adn that his protion of the hearing be and the same is hereby continued to that date In the Matter of Santa Barbara County Employees Association request for Third Party Intervention in Current Salary Negotiations . Mr . Mitchell, deputy county counsel, read Section 3505. 2 of the Government Code indication that arbitration is possible. Mr. Johnson stated that he did not believe that a reasonable period of time has been devoted to areas of disagreement, and could not recommend a third party intervention, but wished to continue to meet with the SBCEA representatives. Mr. Stringer, representing the SBCEA, replied that they were talking about matters that had been discussed 10 months ago which he considered a reasonable time . They chose to operate under the law. For all practical purposes we have 50 unresolved disputes . He fur.ther stated that they ' do not come up with the same figures as Administrative or Personnel offices. If their figures are wrong (SBCEA) they want an impartial person to tell them where and th~y f0lt tha_t they need euillines nnd capnot negotiate without them. Mr. Johnson's reply to this was that they had reviewed the negotiations with the Sheriff's Department - 12~% was originally offered and 12% final offer regardless of strike. The strike moved up adjustment from January 1st, to December 1st. The I guidelines were adopted January 6, 1969 and these are being followed. He referred to the May letter from SBCEA suggesting good faith negotiations . Mr. Stringer stated that up to that time he felt negotiations were fine, but since then the picture has changed since a minority organization has been sucessful without including SBCEA in the negotiations . Mr . Callahan asked if we used 8 county formulas for sheriffs, can we use same for others Mr. Johnson replied in the affirmative but that we also use local date, and that internal relationships must be considered. We are using 8 counties for all I classes common to County Gov't. and he plans to present reconmendations on October 19th Mr. Callahan asked if it would be advisable for a member of the Board to meet with the SBCEA . Mr. Tunnell thought that this was not a good idea, nor would arbitration be. He felt that they should be able to rely on the Personnel Director and the Administrative Officer . October 13, 1970 Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that request for a mediator be denied. Mr. Grant stated that he would vote for the motion but would urge contin- uance of meetings and would hope that next Monday we can have a full discussion of the reconnnendations and attempt to meet the December 1st deadline. 157 Reco . endation that In the Matter of Reconnnendation of the Public Works Director that the the Detention Facili y be Occupied Prior to Detention Facility be Occupied Prior to Completion of .Remaining Items Under Contract. Coapletion of remaining Items Under A letter of recommendation was received from the Public Works Director Contract. Approval of Req. for leave of absence Salaries advising that the County Detention Facility (Jail) is complete with exception ~f some parts of the cinnnunications contract but that the building can be effectively occupied, and reconnnending occupancy prior to completion of the remaining items under contract. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the foregoing recommendationbbe adopted, and that the Santa Barbara Public Safety Authority be and they are hereby requested to permit the County to occupy the County Detention Facility prior to completion of the remaining items under contract, and that the matter of the effect of this action upon existing insurance coverage be carefully looked into . In the Matter of Approval of Request of Supervisor Francis H. Beattie to leave the country on November 14, 1970, for 30 days. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the request of Supervisor Beattie be granted. In the Matter of Allowance of Positions, Disallowance of Positions, and . Fixing of Compensation for Monthly Salaried Positions. (Effective November 1, 1970, Park Department) Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO. 70-632 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) Upon motion the Board adjourned sine die. The foregoing Minutes are hereby approved Lewis, er I 158 ' Approval of Minutes of Oct 13, 1970 Meeting. Right of Way Contract bet. Co. ~ Coast Valley Propert es Co. -Lakeview R to Bradley Rd. I October 19, 1970 Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara 2 State of California, October 19 3 1970 , at 9:30 o ' ~ lock . a ,m Present: Supervisors George H. Clyde , Joe J , Absent: Callahan, Daniel G, Grant, and Curtis Tunnell ; and J. E. Lewis, Clerk. Supervisor Francis H. Beattie Supervisor Clyde in the Chair In the Matter of Approval of Minutes of October 13, 1970 Meeting. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the reading of the minutes of the October 13, 1970 meeting be dispensed with, and approved, as submitted. In the Matter of Execution of Right of Way Contract between the County of Santa Barbara and Coast Valley Properties Company (Morgan Flagg) for Parcel of Land Required to Construct Lakeview Road to Bradley Road, Fifth Supervisorial District. (Parcel #5017.1-2) Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute a Right of Way Contract between the County of Santa Barbara and Coast Valley Properties Company (Morgan Flagg) for parcel of land required to construct Lakeview Road to Bradley Road, Fifth Supervisorial District. (Parcel #5017 . 1- 2) In t he Matter of Acceptance of Right of Way Grant from Coast Valley Properties Company (Morgan Flagg) for Parcel of Land Required to Construct Lakeview Road to Bradley Road, Fifth Supervisorial District. Acceptance of ,.U.ght of Way Grant from Coast Valley Properties Co. to construct Lakeview Rd. t Valley Rd. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Right of Way Grant from Coast Valley Properties Company, a Limited Partnership, (Morgan Flagg) dated October 5, 1970 be and the same Acceptance of Grant Deed fro William T. ~ Elizabeth Colv for reconstr. of East Valley ~ San Ysidro R is hereby, accepted by the County of Santa Barbara for parcel of land needed to con- . struct Lakeview Road to Bradley Road in the Fifth Supervisorial District, without monetary consideration. It is further ordered that the Clerk be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to record said document in the office of the Santa Barbara County Recorder. Colville lle District ads. In the Matter of Acceptance of Grant Deed from William T. and Elizabeth for Reconstruction of East Valley and San. Ysidro Roads, First Supervisorial (State Highway 192 Job No . 1020. 1) . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and car- I ried unanimously, it is ordered that the Grant Deed, dated October 5, 19.70, from William T. Colville, Jr. and Elizabeth Colville be, and the same is hereby, accepted, for reconstruction of East Valley and San Ysidro Roads, First Supervisorial District (State Highway 192 Job No . 1020.1), without monetary consideration. It is further ordered that the Clerk be, and he is hereby, authori zed and directed to record said Grant Deed in the office of the Santa Barbara County Recorder Grant Deeds to City I of Lompoc I Acceptance of Right of Way Grant from th Federated Church of Goleta -cathedral Oa s Rd. it Ribera Dr. I Change Order No. 1- Contract with C. Sanchez-Increase of $811.92. - Santa Ynez Airport Rd. Project. I hange Order No. 2- Contract with C. Sanchez-Increas of $205 .35. - Santa Ynez Airpo r t Rd. Project I bange Order No. 1- to Contract with R. cGray, Inc.-Increas of $657 .80. - Blosser Rd. I hange Order No. 2- o Contract with R. cGray, Inc. - le:reas of $159.46.- Blosser Rd. . / October 19, 1970 159 In the Matter of Execution of Grant Deeds Conveying Parcel s of Land with- City in Limits of Lompoc to the City of Lompoc Pursuant to Terms of Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Executed April 1, 1969 for Reconstruction of Portion of ''I'' Street in City of Lompoc and Miguelita Road, Fourth Supervisorial District, Job No . 403. 1. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute two Grant Deeds, dated October 19, 1970, conveying parcels of land within City Limits of Lompoc to the City ~f Lompoc, pursuant to the terms of a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement executed April 1, 1969, for reconstruction of portion of ''I'' Street in the City of Lompoc and Miguelito Road in the unincorporated area of the Fourth Supervisorial District (Job No. 403.1) In the Matter of Acceptance of Right of Way Grant from the Federated Church of Goleta for Cathedral Oaks Road and Ribera Drive, Third Supervisorial Dis- tri ct. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Right of Way Grant, dated October 12, 1970, be, and the same is hereby, accepted from the Federated Church of Goleta for Cathedral Oaks Road and Ribera Drive, Third Supervisorial District, without monetary considercdon It is fur~her ordered that the Clerk be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to record said document in the office of the Santa Barbara County Recorder . In the Matter of Authorizing Execution of Change Order No . 1 to Contract Sant a Ynez Airport Road between with C. Sanchez for/State Highway 246 to Airport Entrance, for Increase of $811 . 92 . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to execute Change Order No . 1 to contract with C. Sanchez for State Highway 246 to Airport Entrance, for an increase of $811 . 92 . In the Matter of Authorizing Execution of Change Order No . 2 to Contract Santa Ynez Airport Road between wi th C. Sanchez for/State Highway 246 to Airport Entrance, for Increase of $205 . 35 . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and car ried unanimously , i t i s ordered that the Chairman be, and he is hereby, authorized and direct ed to execute Change Order No . 2 to contract with C. Sanchez for State Highway 246 to Ai~port Entrance, for an increase of $205 . 35 . In the Matter of Authori zing Execution of Change Order No . 1 to Contract between with R. McGray, !nc. ,Bloss ~ r R~./ North of Clark Avenue and West of the Town of Orcutt,. for Increase of $657 . 80 . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman be, and he i s hereby, authorized and directed to execut e Change Order No . 1 to contract with R. McGray, Inc . for road project north of Clark Avenue and wes t of the Town of Orcutt, for an increase of $657 . 80 . In the Matter of Authorizing Execution of Change Order No . 2 to Contract between with R. McGray, Inc . , Bloss c1 noad ./ North of Clark Avenue and West of the Town of Orcutt, for Decrease of $159 . 46 . 1.60 Notice of Completion for Constr. of Add to Juvenile Ha I Addition to Lease Agreemen bet. Co. " 1. October 19, 1970 Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to execute Change Order No . 2 to contract with R. McGray, Inc. for road project north of Clark Avenue and west of the Town of Orcutt, for a decrease of $159.46. In the Matter of Filing Notice of Completion for Construction of Addition to Juvenile Hall . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Public Works Director be, and he is hereby, 1 authorized and directed to file a Notice of Completion for construction of an addition to Juvenile Hall, Kenchel Corporation as contractor. It is further ordered that the Clerk be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to record said Notice of Completion in the office of the Santa Barbara County Recorder. In the Matter of Execution of Addendum to Lease Agreement of July 2, 1970 ~ ames B. McClo kevetween the County of Santa Barbara and James B. Mccloskey, Receiver of the Lobero ~ to rent more office space Hotel, for Rental of Additional Office Space for Welfare Department (Folio No. 213)'. for welfare Dept. I Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and car- Accept. of Ri of Way Grant from Mr. John c. Harlan " t ried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute an Addendum to Lease Agreement of July 2, 1970 , dated .October 14, 1970, between the County of Santa Barbara and James B. McCloskey, Receiver of the Lobero Hotel of Santa Barbara, California, to provide additional office space for the Welfare Department at 924 Anacapa Street, for a period of nine months connnencing October 1, 1970, at a rental of $160.00 per month. It is fur'ther ordered that t;:he County Auditor be, and he is hereby, autho- rized and directed to qraw the lease warrants, in the amount of $160.00 per month, in favor of James B. Mccloskey, Receiver of the Lobero Hotel, for the rental payments Said ~arrants should be drawn upon the submission of the proper Demand of Payment form as submitted by the lessor each and every month. . In the Matter of Acceptance of Right of Way Grant from Mr. John c. Harlan and Lucy W. Harlan for Road Purpos ~s, Elwood Acres No . 2, Parcel 1.1 (Folio No. 546), Lucy w. Harla Third Supervisoria~ D~strict, without Monetary Consideration. for Rd. purpos s, Elwood Acres Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried No. 2 I Accept. of Qu claim Deed fr Laura G. Trua - Elwood Ac res No. 2 I unanimously, it is ordered that the Right of Way Grant, dated September 29, 1970, from Mr. John c. Harlan and Lucy W. Harlan, husband and wif~ be, and the same is hereby, accepted for road purposes, Elwood Acres N~. Z Parcel 1.1 (Folio No . 546), Third Supervisorial District, without monetary consideration. It is further ordered that the Clerk be, and he is_ hereby, authorized and directed to record said document in the office of the Santa Barbara County Recorder with the request to return said document to the Real Property Division for further processi ng. - In the Matter of Acceptance of Quitclaim Deed from Laura G. Truax for Per- fecting Title on Mathilda and Elwood Beach Drive, Elwoo~ Acres No . 2~ Parcel 1 (Foli.p 161 October 19, 1970 No . 546), Third Superviosrial District, without Monetary Consideration. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously , it is ordered that the Quitclaim Deed, dated October 9, 1970 from Laura G. Truax be, and the same is hereby , accepted for the purpose of perfecting titl on Mathilda and Elwood Beach Drive, Elwood Acres No . 2, Parcel 1 (Folio No. 546), Third Supervisorial District, without monetary consideration. It is further ordered that the Clerk be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to record said document in the office of the Santa Barbara County Recorder with the request to return said document to the Real Property Division for further processi ng . Right of Way Contra t In the Matter of Execution of Right of Way Contract between the County of btw. Co. & John C. Harlan - Lucy w. Santa Barbara and John C. Harlan and Lucy W. Harlan for Extension of Elwood Beach Harlan-Elwood Acres No . 2 Drive and Mathilda Drive, Elwood Acres No . 2 Assessment District, Parcel 1 (Folio No . Grant Deed from Jo - Lucy W. HarlanElwood Acres No. 2 I I Easement Deed from Stanley L - Madge C. Shepard for Fld Control-Gobernador Creek 546) . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute a Right of Way Contract, dated October 19, 1970, between the County of Santa Barbara and John C. and Lucy W. Harlan, for extension of Elwood Beach Drive and Mathilda Drive,Elwood Acres No. 2, Assessment District, Parcel 1 (Folio No . 546), Third Supervisorial District. It is further ordered that the County Auditor be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to draw and forward a warrant, in the amount of $2,500.00 from Account No . 50-C- 3, payable to Title Insurance and Trust Company, 36 East Figueroa Street, Santa Barbara , California, 93104, for deposit in Escrow No . 126211. C. In the Matter of Acceptance of Grant Deed from John C. and Lucy W. Harlan for Extension of Wlwood Beach Drive and Mathilda Drive, Elwood Acres No . 2 Assessment District, Parcel 1 (Folio No. 546). Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Grant Deed, dated September 29, 1970, from John C. Harlan and Lucy W. Harlan, husband and wife be, and the same is hereby, accepted for extension of Elwood Beach Drive and Mathilda Drive, Elwood Acres No . 2 Assessment District, Parcel 1 (Folio No . 546), Third Supervisorial District . It is further ordered that the Clerk be, and he is hereby authorized and directed to record said document in the office of the Santa Barbara County Recorder with the request to return said document to the Real Property Division for further processi ng . ' In the Matter of Acceptance of Easement Deed from Stanley L. and Madge C. Shepard for Flood Control Purposes, Gobernador Creek, Parcel 1 .1 (Folio No . 568), First Supervisorial District, without Monetary Consideration . ~ 162 I ! I October 19, 1970 Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Easement Deed, dated October 6, 1970 from Stanley L. Shepard and Madge C. Shepard, husband and wife, as their community property be, and the same is hereby accepted for flood control purposes, Gobernador Creek, Parcel 1 .1 (Foli o No . 568), First Supervisorial District, without monetary considerati n . It is further ordered that the Clerk be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to record said document in the office of the Santa Barbara County Recorder following acceptance by the Santa Barbara County Flood Control & Water Conservation District, with the request to return said document to the Real Property Division for further processing . Acceptance of In the Matter of Acceptance of Draft in the Amount of $75 . 60 from Developer Draft for Energizing Str et of Tract #11, 125 to Cover Cost for Energizing 2 -4,000 Lumen Street Lights on Elmhurs Lights on Elmhurst Place Place . Release of Co. Claims for q~~~ia~rom Accidents. Wa iver of Physical Stand Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the draft, in the amount of $75.60 from Michael Towbes, developer of Tract #11,125 be, and the same is hereby, accepted to cover the cost for energizing 2 - 4,000 lumen street lights on Elmhurst Place, to be considered Phase 1 of Tract #11, 125 . The remaining lights are required to be energized prior to occupancy of the remainder of the tract . It is further ordered that the Clerk be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to deposit said check to the credit of County Service Area No . 3 . In the Matter of Execution of Release of All County Claims for Damages to County Property Resulting from Vehicualr Accident, in the Amount of $19. 40 . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman and Clerk be, and theyare hereby, authorized and di rected to execute a Release of all County claims for damages to County property resulting from a vehicular accident, as follows: t Walter Claude Dukes, in the amount of $19,40 . It is further ordered that the Director, Department of Resources & Collections be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to deposit the draft received in full settl ement therefor to the Road Fund . rds for In the Matter of Approval of Requests for Waivers of Physical Standards Prospective Employees . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the following requests for waivers of physical standards for prospective employees be, and the same are hereby, approved, as recommended by Dr . David Caldwell: Claims against Co . on behalf o Richard K. " Donna E. Dolan; Kenn "Martha s. Gill; " Thomas Martin Hayes/ , ' ' October 19, 1970 I' District Attorney - Miss Jeanne Johnson, Typist-Clerk. / Fire Department - Richard Eugene Abraham, Fireman. In the Matter of Claims Against the County Filed by Attorney Kenneth J . Murphy, J r . on Behalf of Richard K. and Donna E. Dolan; Kenneth and Martha s. Gill; th and Thomas Martin Hayes . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carr i ed unanimously, it is ordered that the followi ng claims against the County filed 163 by Attorney Kenneth J . Murphy, Jr . be, and the same are hereby, referred to the County ' Counsel and insurance carrier: / Richard K. and Donna E. Dolan, $150,000. 00 . / Kenneth and Martha S. Gill, $500,000.00. ; Thomas Martin Hayes, $2,000,000. 00. Rider to Oil Drilli g In the Matter of Approval of Rider to Oil Drilling Bond. Bond I Publication of Ordinace No. 2121. ' Reports " Coumunications Communications fro Planning Comm. for Info. only I Pursuant to the reconmendation of the County Petroleum Engineer and in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance No . 1927; Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the rider to oil drilling blanket Bond No . 3507930, Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, covering well ''California 47'' of Continental Oil Company, County Permit No . 3491 be, and the same is hereby, approved. In the Matter of Publication of Ordinance No . 2121 . It appearing from the Affidavit of the Principal Clerk of the Santa Barbara News-Press that Ordinance No . 2121 has been duly published in t he manner and form required by law; Upon motion of Supervisor TunLell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried u11animously, it is determined that Ordinance No. 2121 has been duly published i n the manner and form required by law . In t he Matter of Reports and Communications . The following reports and conmunications were received by the Board for information only and ordered placed on file: only . / Administrative Officer - Uniform Transient Occupancy Tax Collections . / County Health Officer - Report of Money Collected for Animal Control Program during September, 1970. , City of Santa Barbara - Resolution No . 7221 establishi ng unde~g rou nd utility district ,Public Utilities Commission - Application of Swift Air Lines, Inc. to operate as passenger air carrier and freight air carrier to and from Santa Maria Airport. ' Secretary of State - filing of certified copy of City of Carpinteria Resolution No . 323 approving annexation of Bailard Annexation No. 8 . In the Matter of Communications from Planning Commission for Information . 164 Recomm. for adopt. of Ords. Amending Art. IV of Ord.661 to rezone properties ~ create ag~ic. preserves. I , - ~ / October 19, 1970 The following communications from the Planning Commission were received by the Board for information only and ordered placed on file: / Planning Commission Attendance Report, July 1 to September 30, 1970 . / Approved request of R. A. Buelow for Conditional Use Permit (70-CP-55) to permit construction and use of veterinary clinic for small animals on property located at southerly corner of San Marcos Pass Road and Cieneguitas Road. / Approved request of Joseph P . Ragus (70-CP-59) for Conditional Use Permit to allow temporary occupancy of trailer during construction of dwelling on property located on south side of Prell Road approximately 500 feet west from Telephone Road, Santa Maria area . In the Matter of Recommendations of Planning Commission and Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee for Adoption of Ordinances Amending Article IV of Or- dinance No . 661 to Rezone Certain Properties in Santa Maria, Lompoc, Tepusquet, and Los Olivos Areas; and Proposed Creation of Agricultural Preserves . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that Monday, November 9, 1970, at 2 o'clock, p .m. be , and the same is hereby, set as the date and time for public hearings on recommendations of the Planning Commiss ion and Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee to adopt ordinances amendi ng Article IV of Ordinance No . 661, as amended, of the County of Santa Barbara, to rezone the following properties, on the basis that they conform t o the General Plan of the County, and to approve applications to create Agricultural Preserves on said properties under the provisions of Chapter 1443, Statutes of 1965, known as the California Land Conservation Act , from a land use standpoint, on the basis that they conform to the criteria established by the Board of Supervisors of Santa Barbara County: , /1) E. B. Miller (70-RZ-48 ~ 70-AP-22), Santa Maria. / ~)John B. Wineman (70-RZ-59 ~ 70-AP-32), Lompoc . ~3) Arlie E. Lancaster, et al (70-RZ-68 & 70-AP-42), Tepusquet . ~4) Theodore Chamberlin, Jr . & Elizabeth Chamberlin (70-AP-45), Los Olivos. It is further ordered that notice be given by publication in the Santa Maria Times, a newspaper of general circulation, as follows, to-wit: Notice of Public Heari ngs on Recommendations of Planning Commission and Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee for Adoption of Ordi nance Amending Article IV of Ordinance No . 661 to Rezone Certain Properties; and/ or Creation of Agricultural Preserves, Santa Maria, Lompoc, Tepusquet, and Los Olivos Areas . NOTICE is hereby given that public hearings will be held by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California on Monday, November 9, 1970 , at 2 o'clock, p .m. , i n the Board of Supervisors Hearing Room, Fourth Floor, County Administration Building, City of Santa Barbara, State of California, on recommendations of the Planning Commission as well as the Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee to approve the following requests to adopt ordinances amending Article IV of Ordinance No . 661 of the County of Santa Barbar a, as amended, to rezone proper- f ties described below, on the basis that they conform to the General Plan of the County; and/or to approve applications to create agricultural preserves on said properties under the provisions of Chapter 1443, Statutes of 1965, known as the California Land Conservation Act, from a land use standpoint, on the basis that they conform to the criteria established by the Board of Supervisors of Santa Barbara County: 165 I Oct0ber 19, 1970 ' 1) Request of E. B. Miller to rezone property located between State Highway 166 and Santa Maria River approximately 3/4 mi le northeasterly from Black Road, Santa Maria area, f-0rm 10-AG to 40-AG General Ag- I ricultural District Classification , per Planning Commission Resolution No . 70-76 . (70-RZ-48 & 70-AP- 22) 2) Request of Arli e E. Lancaster, et al to rezone property described as Assessor ' s Parcel Nos : 131-140-18, -22, -23, generally located be- tween Cuyama River and Tepusque t Road approximately 2 miles southerly from Colson Canyon Road, Tepusquet area , f r om ''U'' - Unlimited Agri cultural District to 100-AG Gener al Agricultural District, per Planni ng Commiss ion Resolution No . 70-98 . (70-RZ-68 & 70 -AP-42) 3) Request of Theodore Chamberlin , Jr. and Elizabeth Chamberlin to create Agricul tural Preserve on property described as Assessor ' s Parcel Nos . 133-150- 68, - 71 and -73, generally located between Foxen Canyon Road and Figueroa Mountain Road approximately 3 miles northerly from the Town of Los Olivos, Santa Ynez Valley . (70-AP-45) 4) Request of John B. Wineman to rezone property described as Assessor ' s Parcel Nos: 93 - 070-29, - 30, and 93 - 090- 33, -08 , located on the northwest corner of State Highway 246 and Bai ley Avenue and on t he east I and west side of Bailey Avenue north of So. Pacifi c Road, Lompoc area from 8-R- 1- 0, Single Family Residential District and RA-0, Suburban I Agricultural-Residential District to the 40-AL- O, Limited Agricultural District, per Planning Commission Resolution No . 70- 87 (70 - RZ-59 ~ 70-AP- 32); and on creation of agricultural preserve to exclude that portion descri bed as Assessor ' s Parcel Nos . 93 - 070- 29 and -30 on the basis that it would represent an encroachment of agricultural use i nto an area des i gnated as ''industri al park'' and ''residential'', respectively, by General Plan; and on the basi s of present 8-R- 1-0 zoning i n the area (Parcel No . 93-070-30 and easterly portion of 93 -070- 29 WITNESS my hand and seal this 19th day of October, 1970 J . E. LEWIS (SEAL) Harriet Miller ~ In the Matter of Planning Commission Recommendation to Approve Request of Elizabeth N. Harriso - One-Yr . Extension of Harri et Miller and Elizabeth N. Harrison (69- CP-69) for One-Year Extension Relative Permit for Scholl fo Young Children. / to Condi t i onal Use Permit to Construct and Use School for Young Children on Property } Located on Southeast Side of Plaza de Goleta, 700 Feet East of Fairview Avenue, Goleta. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and I carried unanimously, it is ordered that the recommendation of the Planning Commission to approve the request of Harriet Miller and Elizabeth N. Harrison (69- CP- 69) for a one- year time extension relative to a Conditional Use Permit to construct and use a school for young children, Assessor ' s Parcel No . 71- 130- 27, located on the southeast side of Plaza de Goleta, 700 feet east of Fai rvi ew Avenue, Goleta be, and the same I is hereby, confirmed , with the one- year time extension from and after December 1 , 1970. ' I 166 Mrs. Charles Maxim-Conditio al Exception for Parking Spaces Approval of El Capitan / R nch, Tentati e Map Tract I 11,220 I October 19, 1970 In the Matter of Recommendation of Planning Commission to Approve Request of Mrs . Charles Maxim (70-V-51) for Conditional Exception under Ordinance No . 453 to Allow Two Required Parking Spaces Less Than Required 9 Feet at 90 Humphrey Road, Montecito. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the recommendation of the Planning Commission to approve the request of Mrs . Charles Maxim (70-V- 51) for a Conditional Exception under the provisions of Section 2. 43, Section 9(f), and Section 10 of Ordinance No . 453 to I allow two required parking spaces to be 8'3" wide each, instead of the 9 feet requi red be, and the same is hereby, confirmed, for Assessor's Parcel No. 9- 332- 04, located on . the east side of Humphrey Road approximately 250 feet southerly from South Jameson I Lane, and known as 90 Humphrey Road, Montecito, on the basis fo a minor deviation and provision for the required 50-foot front setback. In the Matter of Planning Commission Recommendation for Approval of El Capitan Ranch, Tentative Map Tract #11,220, El Capitan Area . The Planning Commission submitted a recommendation to approve Tentative Map, Tract No . 11,220, El Capitan Ranch subject to certain conditions . H. H. Divelbiss, Planning Director, explained the conditions . Ray .Martin, engineer for the developer, said the conditions are satisfactory, and urged approval. Marc McGinnes, Attorney at Law, questioned the compatabi lity of the proposed development with the master plan of the County; perhaps the 10- acre parcels are in conflict . He felt the Board should not give the developer, Mr . Berman, assurance at this time iri view of the El Capitan Ranch proposition to be voted upon at the November 3, 1970 general election and, therefore, requested denial at t his time . Miss Susan Trescher, Deputy County Counsel, indicated that the proposed subdivision is in complete conformance to the zoning of the land - the ''U'' zoning complies with the Subdivision Map act and 'County ordinance. Therefore, the question raised is outside the matter. Planning Director Divelbiss pointed out the property from a transparency, including the 178 acres plus the extra portion being included due to the design of the subdivision (17 lots plus) . The Subdivision Committee checked this proposal out very carefully and there is nothing in conflict . Mr . Martin said that whetheror not people will reside on the property is irrelevant as under the ''U'' zone, 10- acre agricultural lots can be created. Mrs . James Higman felt this is a stop- gap measure and asked Mr . Martin if the proposed tract would be included if the propositon passes or will this be thrown out and something else substituted. He replied that they submitted a map under the PR zoning and if the election is favorable they will proceed with the map in lieu of this one. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the recommendation of the Pl anning Commission to approve Tentative Map of Tract fill, 220, El Capitan Ranch, stamped ''Received September 2, 1970, Santa Barbara County Planning Department'', being a portion of Assessor's Parcel Nos . 81- 240-12 and - 13, and 81-250-02, located approximately 12 miles westerly of Goleta on the north side of U.S. Highway 101, Third Supervisorial District,be, and the same is hereby, confirmed, subject to the following conditions: Salaries I Travel Authorizatio I Travel Authorizatio I Proposed Expansion of CSAC Directorshi Corrections of 1970-71 Secured Assessment Roll. ' / 167 October 19, 1970 A) Compliance with departmental letters: 1) Road Department dated September 24, 1970. 2) Public Works dated September 24, 1970. 3) Flood Control Engineer dated September 21 , 1970 . 4) Health Department dated September 24, 1970 . 5) Fire Department dated September l~, 1970 . 6) Planning Department dated September 24, 1970 B) That the offer of dedication of all streets be waived, and the streets remain private . C) That the installation of electrical utilities underground as required by Board of Supervisors Resolution No . 24416 be waived on the basis of lot size . In the Matter of Allowance of Positions, Dis-allowance of Positions, and Fixing of Compensation for Monthly Salaried Positions . (Effective October 19, 1970, Santa Barbara General Hospital) Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO, 70 - 633-A (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENI' FILE) In the Matter of Travel Authorization. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that travel from the County on County business be, and the same is hereby, authorized for Planning Cormnissioners Eugene C. Sexton and Robert C. Lilley to attend Annual Conference of the California County Planning Commissioners ' Association on October 21 through 24, 1970 at Fresno, Cal ifornia . In the Matter of Travel Authorization. I Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant , and carried unanimously, it is ordered that travel from the County on County business be, and the same is hereby, authorized for Superior Court Judges Floyd C. Dodson, Morris J . Stephan, and John A. Westwick to attend meeting called by Conference of California Judges at San Francisco , during the period October 23-25, 1970 with travel via three private cars . In the Matter of Proposed Expansion of CSAC Direc torships . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, continued to Monday, October 26, 1970 when a full Board is expected to be present In the Matter of Hearings to Consider Corrections (Additions) to the 1970- 71 Secured Assessment Roll . This being the date and time set for hearings on subject proposals; the affected property owners having been given written notice of the proposal; and t here being no appearances or written statements submitted for or against subj ect proposal ; I 1.68 Cerrections to the 1970-71 Secured Assess aent Roll. List above same order ( October 19, 1970 Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, the following Order was passed and adopted on the following property owners: Marvis E. Bartleson Sam Branker (Essem Development Co . ) Mr . ~Mrs. George J. Hiester Mr . & Mrs. William R. Jurinjak Lester Pezzner Mr . & Mrs . Joseph Sesto, Jr Marguerite E. Ash Fuford R. Barrett, et ux Mr . & Mrs . Webster W. Bernhardt, Jr. Mr . & Mrs . James W. Burns Mr . & Mrs . Gerald Cronkite Mr . & Mrs . Roy H. Curnow Mr . & Mrs . Jefferson W. Egan Mr . & Mrs . Howell G. Guin Mr . & Mrs . Robert L. Harsin Mr . & Mrs . Victor Hieber Mr . & Mrs . Felix H. Hopkins Lloyd D. & Mrs . Keene Marjorie H. Kirkpatrick Mr . & Mrs . Wayne M. Linder Mr . & Mrs. Jerome J . Lubin Mr . & Mrs . Robert L. Nolan Marian J . Scott Mr . & Mrs . Ralph c. Vernola Mr . & Mrs . Everett M. Williams In the Matter of Corrections to the 1970-1971 Secured Assessment Roll. ORDER It is satisfactorily appearing to the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California, from a report filed by the County Assessor, that corrections have been made in certain assessments, and application having been made to this Board by said County Assessor for approval of such corrections to the 1970- 71 Secured Assessment Roll, as provided by the Revenue and Taxation Code Sections 4831,4834, and 4836; and It further appearing that the written consent of the County Counsel and County Auditor of said County of Santa Barbara to the corrections has been obtained therefor; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Auditor and/ or Tax Collector of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California be, and they are hereby , authorized to make the necessary corrections to the 1970- 71 Secured Assessment Roll, as set forth below: (See List on Page 169) The foregoi ng Order entered in the Minutes of the Board of Supervisors this 19th day of October, 1970. Extra Work In the Matter of Extra Work Claim from C. Sanchez & Son Against the County Claia from. C. Sanchez~ Son for Santa Ynez Airport Road Project No . 3027 . 2 in the Amount of $728 . 31. against Co. fo Santa Ynez Ai--ort Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and Rd. Project 1 carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to County Counsel, Public Works Director, and the Road Commissioner in that the project is a joint project . !' I Approval * Ratif acat of County's Insuranc Protection. I t ' October 19, 1970 on In the Matter of Recommendation of Administrative Officer for Approval and Ratification of Certain Aspects of County 's Insurance Protection. The Administrative Officer submitted a report on subject matter and summarized the recent developments in the County's insurance program involving comprehensive public l iability, La Morada building, airport liability, aircraft non-ownership, honesty blanket and faithful performance bonds, depositor's forgery bond, vote counting machines, and miscellaneous. 169 Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the recommendation of the Administrative Officer to approve and r atify the County's insurance protection as contained in the report and the same is hereby, confirmed. be, I .I I I Boa-d o:-: Suocrvisors (Correc~ions) I Septer.~er 2, 1970 125-170- 24 Code 3000 assessed to Essem Development Co c/o Sam Branker ( 617 W Granger Ave #36, Modesto CA 95350) - ADD Land $205, Improvc;:1ents $120, and Real Property Cash Value 1, 300 . 125 - 170- 25 Code 3000 assessed to Howell G/Sara M Guin (715 S 3radley ~c #12, Santa Maria 93454) - ADD Land $205 , Improvements 120, and REal ?r9per~y Cash Value $1 ,300 . 125 - 17 0 - 0 ~ Code 3000 assessed to Ralph C/EJ.anore M Vernola (7:5 S Bradley Rd #5 , Santa Maria 93454) - ADD Land $205 Improverr.ents $120 and Real Property Cash Value $1 , 300 . 1 25- 170 - 02 Code 3000 assessed to William R/Isabel H Jurinjak I ! I I . , ' (1040 E Doane Ave , Santa Maria 93454) ADD Land $205 , Improveme:i~s $120 /'and Real Property Cash Val ue $1 , 300 . 125- 170- 03 Code 3000 assessed to Margueri te E Ash (715 S 3rad~ey Rd #9 , Sa:ita }:ar ia 93454 ) ADD Land $205 , Improvements $1 20 and Real ?roperty Cash Value $1 , 300 125- 170- 04 Code 3000 assessed to Victor /Eil een L Hieber (715 S Bradley Rd #8 , Santa Mari a 93454) ADD Land $200 , Impr ovement s $110 and Real Proper ty Cash Value $1,240 . 125- 170- 05 Code 3000 assessed to Rober t L/Eleanor e Harsin (7: 5 S Bradl ey Rd #7, Santa Maria 93454) ADD Land $205 , Impr ovements $120 and Real Property Cash Va l ue $1 , 300 . 125- 170- 06 Code 3000 assessed to Jerome J/Evelyn Lubi n (715 S Bradley Rd #6 , Santa r1ari a 93454) ADD Land $205, Improvements $120 and Real Property Cash Value $1 , 300 . 125 - 1~0 - 07 Code 3000 assessed to George J / Marilynn D Hiester (1414 S Miller #H , Sant a Mari a 93454) .ADD Land $205 , Improve~en~s $1 20 and Real ?roperty Cash Value $1 , 300 . 125- 170 - 08 Code 3000 assessed to Lloyd D/Ne lloui se Keene (715 S 3radley Rd #4 , Santa Mari a 93454) ADD L~nd $200 , Impr ovement s $110 and Real ?r operty Cash Value $1 ,240 125- 170- 09 Code 3000 assessed to Roy n/Loui se A Curnow (715 S 3radley Rd # 3 , Santa Maria 93454) ADD Land $ 200 , Improvement s $110 and Real Pr operty Cash Val ue $1 , 240 . 125- 170- 10 Code 3000 assessed to Everet t M/Mary J Willia,~s (715 S ~radley Rd #2, Santa Maria 93454) ADD Land $ 205 , Impr ovements $120 and Real ?roperty Cash Value $1,300 . 125- 170- 11 Code 3000 assessed to Wayne M/Elizabeth P Lindner (715 S jjr adl ey Rd #1, Santa 11aria 93454) ADD Land $ 205 , Impr ovements $120 and Real Property Cash Value $1, 300 - -- ' 5oard of Supervisors (Corr ections) p . 2'' Septe:r:-.-er 2, 1970 125-170- 12 Code 3000 assessed to Joseph Sesto Jr et ux (120 Z Cnurch Santa Maria 93454 ) ADD Land $205 , Improvements$120 and Real Property Cash Value $1 , 300 . s-:, / 125- 170- 13 Code 3.000 assessed t .o Felix H Hopkins et ux ( 715 S Bradley San-ca !"Iaria 93454 ) ADD Land $205 , I mprovements $120, Real Property Cash Value $1 , 300 . Kirkpatrick (715 S 125- 170- 14 Code 3000 assessed to Mar j orie H Br adley Rd #23, Santa Maria) ADD Land $200, Real Pro?erty Cash Value $1,240 . Improvements $110 and 1~5 - 170 - 1 5 Code 3000 assessed Beverly Hills 90 201) ADD Land Pro?erty Cash Value $1,300 . to Lester Pezzner $205, Imprvements (9903 Kip Dr, $120 and Real ' I I 125-170 - 16 Code 3000 assessed to Way , Santa Maria 93454) ADD Land Real Pro? e ~ty Cash Value $1,300 . Mavis $205 , E Bartleson (4730 Improvements $120 Crowley1 and 125- 170- 17 Code 3000 assessed to Jefferson W Egan et ux (715 S 3radley Rd , Santa Maria 93454) ADD .Land $205, Improvements $120 and Real Property Cash Value $1,300 . 125-170- 18 Code 3000 assessed to Marian J Scott , (715 S Bradley 1Rd #19, Santa Maria 93454) ADD Land $200 , Improvements$110 and Real Property Cash Value $1,240 . / 125-170- 19 Code 3000 assessed to Gerald/Corine E Cronkite (715 S 3radley Rd #18, Santa Maria 93454) ADD Land $200 , Improvements $110 and Real Property Cash Value $1,240 . 12 5- l 70- 20 Code 3000 assessed to James .\"1 / Bet ty M Burns ( 716 S J Bradley Rd #17, Sant~ Maria 93454) ADD Land $200, Improvemen-cs $110 and Real Property Cash Value $1,240 . -- 1 25-170-21 Code 3000 assessed to Webster W/Mae P Bernhardt Jr (715 S .Bradley Rd #16, Santa Maria 93454) ADD Land $205, Improvereents $120 and Real Property Cash Value $1,300 . 125- 170- 22 Code 3000 assessed to Robert L/Ruth C Nolan (715 S ~radley Rd #15, Santa Maria 93454) ADD Land. $205 , Imprvements $120 and Real Property Cash Value $1,300 . I . 125- 170- 23 Code 30CO assessed to Buford R Barrett et ux (715 S Bradl ey Rd #14 , Santa Maria) ADD Land $205, Improvements $120 and Re~l Property Cash Value $1,300. I I I I I I I I I . I I I . 1.70 Report of Ad Hoc Comm. on Narcotics and Drug Abuse I Proposei Joiat Powers Agreeaent with City of S.B. for Financing of T.erainal Bldg. at Airport. " ( ' t I Report on Public Defender's Of ice j Report froa yor of Lompo re Proposed Amendment to C Code setting aside Land Are to Resolve Pro Created by Use of Unimproved Property by Motorcyclists. / Buildinf Official s Reolving Fund increased from $500 to $3,000. I October 19, 1970 In t he Matter of Report and Recommendation of Administrative Officer and County Cou~sel oi1. October 4, 1970 Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Narcotics and Drug Abuse. Upon motion of Supervisor Callahan, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, continued to Monday, November 2, 1970. In the Matter of Report and Recommendation from Administrative Officer and County Counsel on Proposed Joint Powers Agreement with City of Santa Barbar a for Financing of Terminal Building at Municipal Airport . Subject report was read by the Clerk which indicated that it is generally agreed that the County could endorse the principle with the understanding that such I a procedure would be for a specific project only (a new airport terminal and certain additional parking requirements) which would not commit the County nor obligate it financiall y in any way. Colonel Richard Temple (Ret ' d) of the S. B. County Taxpayers Association recommended that the County does not have to be involved in a joint powers agreement as the City can go ahead and put up the bonds for the voters to consider. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject proposal to enter into a joint exercise of powers agreement for the purpose of creating an authority to construct a new airport terminal be, and the same is hereby approved, in principle; and referred to the County Counsel to confer with the City Attorney and bond attorneys in the preparation of such an agreement In the Matter of Annual Report from Administrative Officer on Public Defender ' s Office . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously~ it is ordered that subject report, read by the Clerk be, and the same is hereby, accepted for filing . In the Matter of Report from Mayor of the City of Lompoc on Proposed Amendment to County Code and Setting Aside of Certain Land Areas to Resolve Problem Created by Use of Unimproved Property by Motorcyclists . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and . carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject communication together with a memorandum from James T. Longtin, Lompoc City Attorney, and a communication from Jack T. Swords of Santa Maria be, and the same are hereby, referred to the Administrative Officer and Sheriff for report and recommendation as to ordinance enforcement I In the Matter of Resolution Establishing $3,000 Revolving Fund for Director of Public Works for Use in Building Ordinance Abatement Actions, Rescinding Resolution No . 22351 to Eliminate Former $500 Building Official ' s Revolving Fund, and Rescinding Board Action of October 13, 1970, Resolution No . 70 - 633 . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO . 70-634 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILES) October 19, 1970 Agreement btw. Co. In the Matter of Execution of Agreement between the County of Santa Eli Luria * Dr. Eugene Aiches to Barbara and Eli Luria and Dr . Eugene Aiches to Make Certain Improvements Concerning make illproveaents on Developaent Plan Development Plan (70-M-88) and to Convey Right of Way to the County. and to Convey . Rt. of Way to c . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and I carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO. 70-635 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILES) Approval of Boundari s In the Matter of Recommendation of Agricultural Preserve Committee to of Agric. Preserve o Mrs. Margaret K. Approve Boundaries of Agricultural Preserve of Mrs . Margaret K. Gardner (68 -AP- 5) . Gardner. I Standard Gas Co. Application for Franchise-Santa Maria Area I Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject recommendation for approval of the . boundaries of the agricultural preserve of Mrs . Margaret K. Gardner (68-AP- 5) be, and the same is hereby, confirmed In the Matter of Report and Recommendation on Application of Standard Gas Company for Franchise to Install, Maintain and Operate an 8-Inc~ Pipeline to Transport Waste Water Obtained through Oil Production from Gathering Site to Treatment Plant, Santa Maria Area . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, continued to Monday, October 26, 1970, at the request of County Counsel. 171 Request of Peter Bakewell to accept . 3 SeparateEasements from Property Owners for Riding Hiking Trail-Montecito Area In the Matter of Request of Peter Bakewell for Montecito Trails Foundation for Consideration of Acceptance of Three Separate Easements Dedicated by Property - ' ( Request of Cach Church Caap for Approval of Increase in Rates. I Owners for Riding and Hiking Trail . Subject letter was read which stated that three Montecito property owners have offered to dedicate easements to the County for a new 10-foot wide riding and hiking trail across their properties, to be called the Mitchell/Whittier/Dellar Trail, about one-half mile long, extending from Bella Vista Drive to Lilac Drive, in a location conforming to that shown on Map GP-18F of the Amended General Plan of Equestrian and Hiking Trails The Foundation requested the Board to agree to accept the three (3) easements for the new trail, authorize the County Surveyor to survey and prepare a legal description of the Mitchell/Whittier/Dellar Trail for the purpose of dedication to the County by means of three (3) separate easements, and to authorize County Counsel to prepare the proper easements for execution and delivery by the property owners involved . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject request be, and the same is hereby, approved, and referred to County Counsel and County Surveyor for preparation of the necessary documents. In the Matter of Request of Cachuma Church Camp for Approval of Increase in Rates . ----------.---------- ---------- - - -------------------------.--- - - 1.72 Approval of Final Map-Trac #11,004, 3rd Supervisorial District. I October 19, 1970 Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the Park Cormnission , Park Director, and County Counsel for report and recommendation. In the Matter of Recommendation of Assistant County Surveyor for Approval of Final Map of Tract #11,004 Located North of Highway 246 and West of Refugio Road, Third Supervisorial District. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervi sor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the reconnnendation of the Assistant County Sur- veyor for approval of the final map of Tract #11,004 located north of State Highway 246 and west of Refugio Road in the Third Supervisorial District be, and the same is hereby, confirmed. The map has been found to be technically correct, conforms to the approved tentative map or any approved alterations thereof and complies with all applicable laws and regulations . Written notice has been received from the Land Development Coordinator that all affected departments and agencies have certifi ed that their requirements have been satisfied and that all bonds, cash deposit s or instruments of credit have been received by the County Clerk; and the County Surveyor ' s certificate . has been executed on the original tracings as provided in Section 11593 of the California Busi ness and Profess i ons Code. S1mary of Proceedings of Traffic Engine Co-. Meeting Oct. 7, 1970 In the Matter of S11nnnary of Proceedings of Traffic Engineering Committee ri~eting on October 7, 1970. I Petitions of 400 siisnature requesting 4-w y stop sirm at corner of Roy 1 Oak Rd & Oak Knoll Rd S. M. I Subject report was submitted to the Board by the Road Commi ssioner . Letters and petitions containing approxi mately 400 s i gnatures were also received by the Board requesting the installation of a four-way stop sign at the corner of Royal Oak Road and Oak Knoll Road in Santa Maria area . Mrs . Patricia Brown appeared to indicate her concern with the traffic hazards and acci dents in the area of Royal Oak Road and Oak Knoll Road . The Committee had recormnended that Oak Knoll Road be designated as a Through Street between Patt erson Road and Dunlap School, and that a centerline be placed on the road. Mrs . Brown contended that the white line down the middle of the road wi ll not relieve the problem. Leland R. Steward, Road Commissioner, explai ned some of the statements contained in the report . Upon mot ion of Supervi sor Tunnell, seconded by Supe-rvisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, i t i s ordered the request of the petitioners for i nstallation of a four-way stop sign at the corner of Royal Oak Road and Oak Knoll Road in the Santa Maria area be, and the same is hereby, approved. It is further ordered that the Suunnary of Proceedings of the Traffic Engineering Cormnittee meeting of October 7, 1970, be, and the same is hereby, approved for a' genda items 10- 1 through 10- 12; item 10-13 bei ng the 4-way stop at the intersection of Oak Knoll Road and Royal Oak Road. Awarding Bid In the Matter of Awarding Bid for Construction of Comfort Station No . 1, for Constr. of Comfort Stati Toro Canyon Park, Santa Barbara. No. 1 Toro Canyon Park, S B. / - Awarding Bid for Constr. of Brown Rd. Santa Maria area. I ' October 19, 1970 The Affidavit of Publication being on file with the Clerk, the following bids were opened at a meeting held on October 15, 1970; the roll was called, and representatives of the following departments were present: County Counsel, Public Works; and J . E. Lewis, Clerk: Fred H. Clyde Don Greene Kenneth c. Urton J . W. Bailey Construction H. Mosley, Inc . Davidson & Cook o. K. Cement $14,600.00 $15,100.00 $14,620.00 $13,657.00 $14,097.00 $13,984.00 $12,384.00 The engineer's estimate was $14,350. 00. The Director of Public Works submitted a report and recommendation to award the contract to OK Industries dba OK Cement Contractors, 419 Olive Street, Santa Barbara, the low bidder 173 It appearing that the bid of o. K. Cement is the lowest and best bid received from a responsible bidder, and that said bid is satisfactory and in accordance with the notice inviting bids for said project; Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the bid of OK Industries dba OK Cement Contractors, in the amount of $12,384.00 be accepted, and that the contract for said project be awarded to the said contractor from Account 52 C 2 at the price and upon the terms and conditions set forth in said bid and in said notice inviting bids. It is further ordered that the Director of Public Works be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to prepare the necessary contract for the work; and the Chai rman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute same. In the Matter of Awarding Bid for Construction of Brown Road from 2.36 Miles to 3 .36 Miles West of State Highway Route 1, Project No . 5016. 2, Santa Maria. The Affidavit of Publication being on file with the Clerk, the following bids were opened at a meeting held on October 15, 1970 in Santa Maria; the roll was called, and representatives of the following departments were present: County Counsel, Roads; and J . E. Lewis, Clerk: 1) M. J . Hermreck, Inc. 2) Tony Sanchez, Inc . 3) Arthur Q. Evans 4) C. & J . Lambert, Inc. 5) C. Sanchez ~ Son, I nc. 6) Harold D. Peterson 7) Walter Bros. Constr. Co . Inc 8) Phillips Construction Co . 9) A. J . Diani Construction Co. 10) Madonna Construction Co . The engineer's estimate was $95,400.00. $77,802.01 $86,903 . 76 $98 ,266 .50 $101,815.60 $J_o2, 744. 90 $101,535.05 $110,384. 4.5 $110,719 .68 $114,973.00 $129,483 .00 The Road Commissioner submitted a report and recommendation t o award the contract to M. J . Hermreck, I nc . , P.O. Box 217, Nipomo, California, t he low bidder. It appearing that the bid of M. J. Hermreck, Inc. is the lowest and best bid received from a responsible bidder, and t hat said bid is satisfactory and in accordance with the notice inviting bids for said project; 1.74 Resolution fro Ca. Bd. of Ed. disapproving proposed foraation of Unified School Dist.-S.M. are I . Resolution req Dept. of Healt Ed. " Welfare to Restore Cut in Grant H-701 to S.B. area I October 19, 1970 Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the bid of M. J. Hermreck, Inc., in the amount of $77,802. 01 be accepted, and that the contract for said project be awarded to the said contractor at the price and upon the terms and conditions set forth in said bid and in said notice inviting bids . It is further ordered that the Road Commissioner be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to prepare the n~cessary contract for the work; and the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute same . In the Matter of Res olution from California State Board of Education Disapproving Proposed Formation of Unified School District as Part of Master Plan for County, Comprising Area of the Santa Maria Joint Union High School District . Subject resolution was read by the Clerk . William Sommermeyer, Chairman of the Santa Barbara County Committee of School District Organization stated that the action of the State Board of Educati on is completely unexplainable . His committee is having a meeti ng next week as there is no other plan that can be devised at this point. Upon motion of Supervisor Callahan, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, placed on file In the Matter of Resolution Requesting the Department of Health, Educati on and Welfare to Restore the Cut in Grant No . H-7012 to the Santa Barbara Area . Mr . David Duerr explained the overall cut in the whole we.stern area which was not authorized by Congress . Mr . Paul Floyd, Assistant Administrative Officer, said this program was the best investment in the community . He felt the Board shoulp support the Community Action Commission to restore the funds under the head start program. Upon motion of Supervisor Callahan, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted : Resolution No . 70-635-A (ORIGINAL IN FERMANEN1!' FILES) Salary Reco. . nd. In the Matter of Presentation of Salary Recommendations by Administrative by Adinistrat ve Officer Officer. The Administr ative Officer submitted salary recommendations fpr the Board to consider in time to make changes effective December 1, 1970, and that the Auditor- Controller be authorized to t ransfer funds from the contingency account to each of the departmental budgets as adopted salary adjustments may require . It was pointed ont that salary recommendations have already been made and approved for a certain segment of County employees, to become effective December 1, 1970 and with this deviation from the County's previous plan to consider salary changes on January 1, 1971, it is felt most necessary to make such other adjustments as the Board may deem appropriate on December 1, 1970, also . The recommendations submitted are the result of a review of data and evaluation of the selected eight counties used for comparison purposes as well as appropriate local data, and are based upon the benchmark concept as well as concern October 19, 1970 175 for interior relationships and will provide a sound, competitive position for the . County within the labor markets. Every effort has been made to meet the spirit and intent of the Governmert Code in discussing and reviewing candidly the proposals as presented by employee representatives of the recognized employee organizations concerned - the S. B. County Employees Association, the S. B. County Attorneys Association, and the local unit of the Social Workers Union, Local 535 . They are in agreement in many areas; however, in some areas they are not, but administration and other staff members will continue to discuss the differences to try and reach mutually acceptable resolutions prior to any final action the Board may wis.h to take. Department heads have been advised of these recommendations and their comments and suggestions have been con- sidered. In addition to salary figures provided, there are currently two recommendations which it is felt correlate very closely to the salary picture: It has been suggested that some technique be devised for recognition of the bilingual requirements of various County departments . The Director of Personnel will investigate this area closely and report back to the Board his recommendations by mid-February 1971 . The other area is the duty hours of personnel in the Fire Department on shift duty Currently, the duty schedule is established on an 84-hour-per-week schedule . It is recommended that this be reduced to a 72- hour schedule as of December 1, 1970, with another reduction to an approximate 67- hour schedule on July 1, 1971, with attendant revisions in the manner in which vacation time is applied to the work schedule. The salary recommendations cover 406 classes, 2,449 positions and percentage changes ranging f ron no change up to 20%. This does include department and .3 v assistant depar.tm ent heads but does not include elected officials, court attaches, . . . . . or other personnel whose s.a.l aries are controlled by State statute. Four classes ~ ~~ not recommended for adjustment are Licensed Vocational Nurse, X-Ray Technician, XRay Technician-Mobile, and Supervising X-Ray Technician. The estimated cost of these adjustments, if made effective December 1, 1970, for t he remainder of the fiscal year, would be approximately $1,120,000, i neluding increased financial requirements for County retirement contributions, OASDI, and compensation insurance premiums, all of which are computed as direct coefficients of payroll costs . The average increase per employee is 8 . 54%. There has been concern on the part of employees regarding the January date for salary adjustments . In discussions with the Sheriff ' s Benefit & Relief Association, it was agreed that administration would review their salaries ~gain in July, 1971; therefore, it is felt the Board should consider this date for all employees . R. D. Johnson, Administrative Officer, in making his presentation to the Board, stated that if the Board adopts these recommendations effective December 1, 1970, in order to provide the amount of funds in the contingency a restriction should be introduced on the employment for vacant positions and extra help. I Leonard Roders, President of the Social Workers Union, made his presentation and stated that the Union voted that the recommendations submitted are inadequate He requested administration to continue discussions . He pointed out that the position of Eligibility Worker was misclassified three years ago because the true responsibil- I.ti.es were never put in the Job descri.pti.on. He proceed e d to explain the responsibil ities of that position. 1.76 Allowance of Claiws ' Coaaunicatioas J --------- - October 19, 1970 Mr. Roders pointed out the need for improvement in the turnover factor. Zack L. Stringer, General Manager of the Santa Barbara County Employees Association, said there will be further discussions this week to review many of the classifications. David Minier, District Attorney, made his presentation as a department head only. With respect to the positions of Chief Deputy District Attorney and Assistant District Attorney, the 10% increase is not adequate ~n comparison with the eight-county sample. He submitted three charts which show averages computed differently . John Hass, Attorney at Law, appeared in support of Mr. Minier's request, stating that the personnel should be upgraded. . , ' Colonel Temple (Ret'd) of the s. B. County Taxpayers Association .said all the tax groups wish to appear before the Board before it acts on the salary recommendations submitted. Therefore, he requested a continuance of subject matter for a week. Upon motion of Supervisor ' Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, continued to Monday, October 26, 1970 ~he Board recessed until 2 o'clock, p .m. At 2 o'clock, p .m., the Board reconvened Present: Supervisors George H. Clyde, Joe J. Callahan, Daniel G. Grant, and , ~~rtis T11nnell ;and J.E . 1e~4is,_ Clerk: _.:~: Absent: SUR~nzisor Francis u. Beattie Supervisor Clyde in the Chair In the Matter of Allowance of Claims. I , Upon motion, duly seconded, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the following claims be, and the same are hereby allowed, each claim for the amount and payable out of the fund designated on the face of each claim, resp.ectively, to-wit: on rile: (See Claims List on page 177) Upon the roll being called, the following Supervisors voted Aye , to-wit: George H. Clyde, Joe J. Caltahan, Daniel G. Grant and Curtis Tunnell. Noes: None. Absent: Francis H. Beattie In the Matter of Communciations. The following communications were received by the Board and ordered placed / Residence Halls Association UCSB - Operation One-On-One, to establish communications between University and the Santa Barbara Community /Lake Los Carneros Residents Association - opposition to development of El Capitan Ranch property. . . I October 19, 1970 177 .j ' AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER N U M B ER I Hiii 11100 10191 HUI lt1tl HI.It DJ.II 101 PAYEE 1 ~ d . .n.a . lllda Cllnlil ~I ~-----~-- llilWlN _ 9-lN .,. a . al . llllMM ,__ca A. lllftF~ .i . - ft.lllMiat - . lld.Mdll. 10197 l91ie a . W Celif - Ct lllOI C811. . ._ CO l.8110 tilllll9 U111 a. 111MW Ma 11111 c . lOlJ.1 0.111 QI J.111 , . Ce SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PURPOSE 2 1et _ii* . ClaeAlw . ., . =-.,_ SYMBOL 181' 1 14 a 10. 22 11 a I u a 11 1121 821 u 111 nan JI a 22 a I I J7 a IJ . u. mo W ARRANT ALLOWED FOR 21 u.a ltl.31 u n. . w.11 ut.H llJ. 111.M . , . 10 n.1 11. . , U.H . , IM.U "" n.u u. . J 11.a i . , 100.00 Jl.Je 11.IO 100.00 l0.00 . .a ,. U.71 u.oo JJ.JO . 1 151.IS Ml.Q. -. , REMARKS . . l AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANTA BARBARA COUNTY . . NUMBER PA YEE PURPOSE SYMBO L I ALLOW ED FO R REMARKS W ARRANT ~~~-~~~~~~~.:.;--~~1--~~~~~~~1-~~~~: .- . ltu.f Wll Wlt lOIJI . WU . Wll 1GD ieu w.- . - . , 1elll - _. 11114 eelMa ~ UUI ._ - 11117 11119 lUI _.Wk_., J.Utl .-.a.a. _. . Ula 1eJAI MaMit 11141 111 , ., , MIAt 10111 . NU-a. .a& ~ . . . Cllllllliftll &Gii le_, MUad . ., all , , , , Pal t r- r IOaU . MD 1 191 . ma11 U. a IOI a U JMSll 8 lot. s 111 a .". "" U.41 , . n.a ass. JJM 2. an.as i.,. . 1_, IU.M . u. . 1 n.u to a II ut. 1.,. " ll 1., . . . l.tl Hall l.ff . It.IA CV a U.ot JaD au 114 . cg ft Ill. ,. 211.11 n.u u.ao a., 111.ss . in. - . ,;- . I . AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANTA BARBARA COUNTY FUND DATE & . NUMBER I &1111 ltlM , . WU PAYEE ua 1'_._._. UHi _._. . . . a , 19111 . ,. toe.111- ""' Cell . HUI Clif . 09; ltlff *'' l8171 wn .U1,7.J. 191.,. &ll'N lllft J.U7a ltl'9 llJal , . 1tlU J.9111 I ltJll -- 1.lM 11191 \C 1;; I MnMll . . . n . . 111M.r . -- .i - . --.i a.ltllr . . Celll Wt11r .,_ _ - PURPOSE . - . ., a.111111 . . " . SYMBOL in au Wt 110 110 Ila a II lllJl uea 1 Ill 17 UOD Ill. .l.i t Ula! J.M lh , J u. 1171 WARRANT ALLOWED FOR 1 , . . au.a 1 , . u.u . . t.n '" u . , 7J.U M.OI b.U ., . .,.,. w.n DLll ., . .,. , . u u . 11.ft . - REMARKS UI a U Jlt. llO a U J. . . UI a I 111.17 11181 Ut. I lta. lit a I l.tllt AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANTA BARBARA COUNTY FUND_;__.;.;___c_;--'----- -----DATE ,. ' ' T NUMBER w.M . lout 18.H Hl 1119' PAYEE liiUA. t- -- PURPOSE SYMBOL Illa U f " ' : . 11111 . lllll 111 1ltU 111 - . ~ Gilli -- nl ' - ,. -.& . . . - , ' llt 1f&au. Y. tldft&a HUI . . Hat 1i HIU , ., 1 t . 1'.a u . ., - . ,. . . . . . . . *Ula ' UID llillCllale . t .'.C-157 Hlll sa lllta 111 an lllaU . ia u . . . . WARRANT ALLOWED FOR REMARKS NUMBER 11 Pia 1tUI J,altl . . IAltf UI 11111 MIU 111SI . 1 _ UM! Hiii - 1111t ,._ , \C 1!31 ., . ,'-:,I,.' AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANTA BARBARA COUNTY FUND'----=~==-__ ____ .DATE PAYEE PURPOSE SYMBOL . . au au __ . , --- 111 .a . . -u . 111 an ~-- . _L~ I ct.tr ,., useu Clellf--- ~----- 111 --- lM a JJ.1 u. . eMda . nan .,. . . ,. lllHJ.ia lit. 11 . - . . . . . . , . u.- . . . . . -. . a. __ .,. , . a ~ - aew - . llisl 1171 WARRANT ALLOWED FOR n.M . , i . . M. . LU u . , . . . at 171. . us . . . . 11.u a.a l. . , . 1ie.oo 21.11 . ., . REMARKS . ' - lit a Ill ta. 117 11 . . ml aa nIll 1 . . ' . , .; J, AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER . " . . I SANTA BARBARA COUNTY - FUND tlWa"Le_ ____ _J.D.JATE-.= .= ='.- --"J.=t:.s:._;:1=1.f.:;_;t; \ . NUMBER PAYEE PURPOSE SYMBOL ALWLOAWRREDA NFTO R REMARKS Hin ~, urau JLQ uni tflMOI&_ D.M "'" . JA7 . ~ . lit u.u &1171 . , ., . . a.niir . U. le 111 . _. 119 ll -- ~-. . - ,. aa111 , . ~ - . , . # . . ~ . .-.ML . WUU 1.t11.e7 . . a.II . ~ lilt ,.,. Miii Oal&f i a21 , . , J.Nl.U . -.Id.e. .u. lit. u Ml.II . lit . --a. a.la sn.11 -.1 . ,f-la .s . . . llliriia 111.n . ._.c.u.u. . . .U.I.M a . ua a "' ., ' . It u 1n.oe . ,. 174. J lit.it i 111.Jt Ul99 . a. iaau . l- ~ ,. SM.II . e.u---- 141.U . . us . . . u.,. . ., l 1 . "' 1IMI . .6. t7.H .,. . Jftl uCJ 1an . .a. . - U.IO ,. -~--- 1.u .:\C -15 "1 NUMBER J.eRl J.IJU \C-1u7 ' - . AUDITOR'S \\\ARRANT REGISTER I ' SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ,. I~.~ .o, ' FUND ~ PAYEE PURPOSE SYMBOL 6ilil . s.n au Wil m . 119l9 . . ., 1 Jf . haM UIA UaM aaw PaU , u ,. JA teaM . tA 14 JA , . 14 10S. 1 w lll " : . . WARRANT ALLOWED FOR , . , . . , . .,_ . U.M ., . 11 LM Mt.II 17~ . 11.M -.1aa.11 REMARKS . i NUMBER 11117 HIM ' .\ C. l!l J AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER PAYEE ~- ,. . SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PURPOSE . . -.:=, ,. ~., .) SYMBOL J.M It ltl a M ueau , WARRANT ALLOWED FOR n.1 11. u . u,ue.u n.Yn.ta 111.M u . . . REMARKS " I I AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANT A BARBARA COUNTY ===:=-----DATE . . NUMBER PAYEE PURPOSE SYMBOL 1 .e.e ua.t a n.tMir _ . . , , a Wit ~ . , . .,, , 11 ------ .1 9 . . Dl 8 l4 . Hiil _, ( ftn , c . . ltJU , . , ,. , ,\C-157 U,UM WARRANT ALLOWED FOR 11 .c.ur. , . l.G ,. u.n U.D , W.181.a_. ,. REMARKS ean.s. . - -- . . . ,. NUMBER PAYEE 11111 . lllM ,., lent , 11111 ,\ C. tliJ . , . - AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANTA BARBARA COUNTY FUND .,._ ___ ~DATE ---ll, UJ . PURPOSE --~ SYMBOL . . . . Ill l1t . lt , IUaU WARRANT ALLOWED FOR H 11 . 4.ll . . ,. Nft c e-'11 t . . . /_ REMARKS , . . . NUMBER .Y-t17 n. -m a-n 1-711 -111 -,m. , , . ,.,. \C- ID 7 # ' ' AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER ,. SANTA BARBARA COUNTY FUND 1MM19'---____ _,DATE_ PAYEE PURPOSE SYMBOL . ~ 1\ MAl UlllilU Mau . , "A 10 . HI & J.O .-a.-- . } -.u. uta1 c. . WARRANT ALLOWED FOR ltl.JY 111.n 117 n.11 u.n i. *-'' Ill.ft REMARKS . . I NUMBER PAYEE ' . , . I I . ~ ' . ' . \C-157 - ' ( ' . ' I u " AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER I SANT A BARBARA COUNTY I FUND . DATE ' PURPOSE SYMBOL I I \ t t . . . . ""- ' ' I ' ' . ~ ' . - . WARRANT ALLOWED FOR .aa.n . . . . , a., u ,. . , P.tU.n - ' ". 1.1u.tl \ , ' . , . ~ . . REMARKS --- --------,----- -., ------,---.,.- _ ------------------------------~------,-----~~------- i 1.78 lo u October 19;' 1970 San Luis Obispo County Board of Supervisors - resolution supporting J Cojo Anchorage. . State Division of Highways - designation of Road Commissioner as I County Coordinating Agent regarding TOPICS Program, and outline of duties. California Senate Committee on Judiciary - notice of hearing October 22, 1970 at 9:30 a .m. in Mural Room of Santa Barbara County Court House, on dissemination of criminal records (SR 287, Lagomarsino) Resoutien fro In the Matter of Resolution from Isla Vista Community Council Requesting 1.v.c.c. req. Bi. of Super- Board of Supervisors to Purchase Land where Perfect Park is Located. visors to Purchase Land Subject communication was read by the Clerk, and Mr. Van !tali from the where Perfect Park is Locate Community Councel made comments in support of the request. / Notice fr Gov. Reagan on A communication from State Departments of Parks and Recreation, dated October 6, 1970, was also received by the Board. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Superviscr Tunnell, and carried unanimously , it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the Park Director . In the Matter of Notice from Governor Reagan on Public Service Internship Public Service Program. Internship Pro~. I Netice of Cost Refund to Co. of S.B. - Reselution Opposed to Prop. 18 re Use of Gasoline Tax Fuads. ' - - Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the Administrative Officer . In the Matter of Notice from State Board of Equalization of Administrative Cost Refund to the County of Santa Barbara of $595 . 68. j Subject communication was read by t he Clerk which indicated that the State Controller, on November 18, 1970, will mail the County of Santa Barbara a warrant for the regular monthly advance payment plus the amount of the County refund in connection with local sales taxes. Cost down to $1 .10 per $100. 00. Upon motion of Supervisor Callahan, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject refund be, and the same is hereby, approved for acceptance, and when received, deposited with the County Auditor to the General Fund. In the Matter of Resolution in Opposition to Proposition 18 Relating to Use of Gasoline Tax Funds. Resolutions were received by the Board from Fresno County and Lake County Boards of Supervisors on subject proposal to be voted upon at the November 3, 1970 election, which were ordered placed on file . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried, with Supervisor Clyde voting "No'', the Board passed and adopted the following resolution: Resolution No . 70-636 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILES) . . . Reselutien Specifyin Te1as ani Coaaitieas fer Sale of Proaisse y Netes ~ Autherizing Aelicitatiea ef Bids I Rezoning ef Preperti s fer Agric . Preserves I October 19, 1970 In the Matter of Resolution Specifying the Terms and Conditions for the Sale of Promissory Notes of Santa Barbara County and Authorizing Solicitation of Bids Therefor . Upon motion of Supervisor Callahan, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted : Resolution No , 70 - 637 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILES) In the Matter of Hearings on Planning Connnission and Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee Recommendations to Approve Requests for Adoption of Ordinances Amending Article IV of Ordinance No . 661 to Rezone Certain Properties in Goleta, Santa Maria, and Guadalupe Areas for Agricultural Preserves . 179 This being the date and time set for hearings on Planning Commission and Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee recommendations to approve the requests of the following property owners for adoption of ordinances amending Article IV of Ordinance No . 661 to rezone certain properties in Goleta, Santa Maria, and Guadalupe areas for agricultural preserves ; the Affidavit of Publication being on file; and there bei ng no appearances or written statements submitted for or agai ns t subject proposals; . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered tha t the recommendations of the Planning Commission and t he Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee to adopt ordinances amending Article IV of Ordi nance No . 661 of the County of Santa Barbara, for agricultural preserves I be , and the same are hereby, confirmed, on the basis that it conforms to the General Plan of the County: . / l) Goleta Valley Egg Ranch (69-RZ-60), Goleta , rezone from A- 1-X to 100-AL District Classification on request to rezone to 50-AG; and annexation of property to existing Stow Company and La Patera Cattle Company (68-AP-8) (68-RZ-29) agricultural preserve . / 2)Wilbur s. Souza (70-RZ-32), Santa Maria, rezone from 10-AG to 40-AG District Classifi cation on request to rezone to 100-AG ~3) John B. Wineman (70-RZ-53) , Santa Maria, rezone from C-3 and 10- AG to 40-AG District Classification, with exception of the northerly 913 . 63 feet I long and approximately 135 feet wide portion of the property accommodating at present an access road, thus preserving existing C-3 zoning along West Main Street . / 4) Will H. Wineman (70-RZ-58), Guadalupe, rezone from ''U'' to 40-AG District Classification. It is further ordered that the following ordinance be passed and adopted: ~ In the Matter of Ordinance No . 2124 - An Ordinance Amending Or- I I 'Ordinance No. 2124 Rezeaing ef Prepert J~r Agric. Preserves es dinance No . 661 of the County of Santa Barbara~ as Amended, by Adding Section 656 . ' '. . to Article IV of Said Ordinance . Upon. the roll being called, the following Supervisors voted Aye, to-wit: ' George H. Clyde, Joe J. Callahan, Daniel G. Grant and Curtis Tunnell. Nos : None Absent: Francis H. Beattie l ----------.,.-----------------------------------------~-----~"~----- ---- -- 1.80 October 19, 1970 Creatiea of Agric. Pres47rv s. Advisory In the Matter of Hearings on Planning Commission and Agricultural Preserve Committee Recommendations for Creation of Agricultural Preserves in the . ' Goleta, Santa Maria, and Guadalupe Areas. This being the date and time set for hearings on subject proposals; the Affidavits of Publication being on file with the Clerk; A communication was received by the Board and read by the Clerk from James R. Christianse~ , President of the Goleta Union School District Board of Trustees, protesting the establishment of the agri cultural preserve for the Goleta Valley Egg Ranch, in view of the Board ' s refusal to reimburse the school district for its revenue losses. ' There being no further appearances or written statements submitted for or against subject proposal; Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the recommendations of the Planni ng Commission and Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee to approve the following appli cati ons to create 1443, Statutes of 1965, known as the California Land Conservation Act, be, and the same are hereby, confirmed, from a land use standpoint, on the basis that it conforms to the criteria established by the Board of Supervisors of Santa Barbara County: ~l) Goleta Valley Egg Ranch (68-AP-8) , Goleta / 2) Wilbur s. Souza (70 -AP-14), Santa Maria I 1 3) John B. Wineman (70-AP- 27), Santa Maria / 4) Will H. Wineman (70-AP-31), Guadalupe It is furt her ordered that the following resolut i on be passed and adopted: Reselution fer In the Matter of Creation of Agricultural Preserves in the Goleta, creatiea ef agric. preserv a.Santa Maria, and Guadalupe . Executioa ef Shert Fera La Coaservati Coatracts creatiag Agric Preserves. RESOLUTION NO . 70-638 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILES) In the Matter of Execution of Short Form Land Conservation Contracts Creating Agricultural Preserves . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and car- 1 ried unanimously, the following resolutions were passed and adopted authorizing the . . Chairman and Clerk to execute Short Form Land Consei;:vation Contracts on agricultural preserves: ' Resolution No . 70 - 639 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILES) 1 (Goleta Valley Egg Ranch, 68-AP-8), Goleta. Resolution No . 70-640 (ORIGINAL IN-PERMANENT FILES) 1 (Wilbur S. Souza, 70 -AP- 14) , Santa Maria. Resolution No . 70-641 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILES) /(John B. Wineman, 70-AP- 27), Santa Mar~a . Resolution No . 70-642 (ORIGI NAL IN PERMANEN'I' FILES) ; (Will H. Wineman, 70-AP-31), Guadalupe ) 181 October 19, 1970 equest for Report e In the Matter of Request for Report from County Assessor on the Effect ffect Agric. Prese s as en Assess ValuatU.Agricultural Preserves Has on Assess Valuation of the County. f the CouRty. / Reariag Propeaed Abol t1e ef Ce. Fir Zene 7, Lompoc. Abolition Zone No. 7 of Fire I Heariag e Appeal of Dr. Eugene Aiches Supervisor Callahan asked how much property has now gone into agricultural preserves in the County, and the reply was approximately 240,000 acres . He questioned the effect this has on the assessment roll . Upon moti on of Supervisor Callahan, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carri ed unanimously, it i s ordered that the County Assessor be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to advise the Board of Supervisors on what effect the amount of acreage that has gone into agricultural preserves has on the assessed valuation of the County. In the Matter of Hearing on Proposed Abolition of County Fire Zone #7, Lompoc (Vandenberg-Mission Hills Area) . Thi s being the date and time set for hearing on subject proposal; the Afficavi t of Publication being on file with the Clerk; and there being no appearances or written s t atements submitted for or against subject proposal; Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject heari ng be , and the same is hereby, concluded. It is further ordered that the following resolution was passed and adopted: In the Matter of Abolishing Special Fire Protection Zone No . 7 in the Santa Barbara County Fire Protection District. (Vandenberg-Mission Hills Area, Fourth Supervisorial District) Resolutipn No . 70- 643 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FU.ES) f roa Coniitieas Approval ef Develepa at ?laa fer Office Blig , In. the Matter of ~earing on Appeal of Dr . Eugene Aiches from Conditions Imposed on Planning Commission Approval of Development Plan (70-M- 88) for Office Building, Goleta . Geleta. I Geleta Valley Heusi Ce-ittee, lac.Request for Revised Partial Devele~eat fer Kellegg Ave., Goleta. ( This being the date and time set for hearing on subject matter; the Affidavit of Publication being on file with the Clerk; Dr . Aiches submitted a written request that this matter be withdrawn from the agenda as a compromise agreement has been affected between him and the County Road Department . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, removed from the agenda . In the Matter of Hearing on Planning Conunission Recommendation to Adopt an Ordi nance .Amending Article IV of Ordinance No . 661 on Request of Goleta Valley Housing Committee, Inc . (70- RZ - 71) to Allow for Revised Partial Development, Eliminating Condition for Covering Required Automobile Parking Space on Property Located on West Side of Kellogg Avenue, Approximately 100 Feet North of Hollister Avenue, Goleta . This being the date and time set for hearing on subject proposal; the Affidavit of Publication being on file with the Clerk; . 182 Qrdi aace Ne. 2125 Geleta Vall ey Heusing ce-:lttee, lac I Appeal ef UHaul Ce. req. Trail r it T Reatal Servic at Service Sta. at 5960 Calle Real, Ge le ta. I ltequest ef Mace Cerp. fer Coaciti 1 Use Perait re Tille Liait Occupaacy f Caapiag Space I ' October 19, 1970 A communication was received by the Board and read by the Clerk from F. W. Hilton in opposition to subject proposal There being no further appearances or written statements submitted for or against subject proposal; Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the recommendation of the Planning Commission to adopt an ordinance amending Section 579 of Article IV of Ordinance No . 661 from request of the Goleta Valley Housing Committee, Inc . (70-RZ-71) to allow for a revised partial development plan which eliminates the condition for covering required automobile parking spaces, Assessor's Parcel No . 71-090-49, generally located on the west side of Kellogg Avenue, approximately 100 feet northerly of Hollister Avenue, I Goleta be, and the same is hereby, confirmed, on the basis of Report of Findings and Recommendation as set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No . 70 - 99, and the Board passed and adopted the following ordinance: In the Matter of Ordinance No . 2125 - An Ordinance Amending Ordinance No . 661 of the County of Santa Barbara, as Amended, by Amending Paragraph a) and Paragraph c) of Section 579 of Article IV of Said Ordinance. Upon the roll being called, the following Supervisors voted Aye, to -wit: George H. Clyde, Joe J . Callahan, Daniel G. Grant, and Curtis Tunnell. -~~ --- Noes: None . Absent: Francis H. Beattie In the Matter of Continued Hearing on Appeal of U-Haul Company from Planning Commission Determination that Requested Trailer & Truck Rental Service from Automobile Service Station at 5960 Calle Real, Goleta, is Not a Permitted Use in the CH District Classification of Ordinance No . 661 (70-M-67) . I This being the date and time set for the continued hearing on the subject proposal; Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject hearing be, and the same is hereby, duly and regularly continued to Monday, December 21, 1970 at 2 o'clock, p .m. to allow the Planning Commission to finish hearings and report back to the Board In the Matter of Continued Hearing on Request of Macco Corporation (Rancho Santa Barbara) for Issuance of Conditional Use Permit (70-CP-33) Regarding Time Limit on Occupancy of Camping Spaces . This being the date and time set for the continued hearing on subject proposal; I George H. Allen, Attorney at Law, appeared before the Board, and discussion ensued on the wording of the draft of the proposed modification to Conditions ''D'' and ''L'' of the Macco Corporation Conditional Use Permit, such as using the ex- . press ion of "in any calendar year'' rather than ''12-month period'' Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried, 't'1ith Supervisor Callahan voting "No'', it is ordered that the proposed modification to Conditions ''D'' and ''L'' regarding time limit on occupancy of camping spaces of the Macco Corporation (Rancho Santa Barbara) Conditional Use Permit (70- CP-33) be, and the same is hereby, approved - ----------~------------------------------------------------ 183 October 19, 1970 f Request of Welfare irecter fer Approval Altera.ate Plau to lllpleaet Feoi Staap Pregraa and Fuads. . .Plan In the Matter of Request of Welfare Director for Approval of Alternate to Implement Food Stamp Program, and Funds Therefor . Subject written request was received by the Board and read by the Clerk. It stated that during the initial planning for the food stamp program, it was noted that in the majority of California counties there was utilization of banks and loan companies for the stamp issuance service. However, he has been unable to negotiate similar contracts in this county . As plans call for the food stamp plan to be in operation by November 1, 19f 0, he requested approval to make necessary fund transfers, as approved by the Administrative Officer, for alternative plans . If no private contracts for stamp issuance services are available, it will be necessary for t he Welfare Department to develop t hese ~ervices as a departm~ntal function and funds will need to be transferred for 1 extra help positions, regular salaries, office rental, vault storage services, armored car t ransport services, and related operational costs . eseluti urgia support of Foei Sta Pregraa by Local Fiaacial Istitutie s. Salary Rece eaati as Laguaa County Saaitatiea Distr ct Persennel. Arthur Nelson, ~elfare Director, appeared in support of his request Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: In the Matter of Urging Support of Food Stamp Program by Local Financial Institutions . Resolution No . 70 - 644 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILES) In the Matter of Salary Recommendations from Administrative Officer on Laguna County Sanitation District Personnel . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carri ed unanimously , it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same i s hereby, continued to Monday, October 26, 1970, at the request of the Administrative Officer. Report fro Ceissi In the Matter of Report from Commission on Isla Vista to The Regents of Isla Vista to The Regeats of the U. of the University of California . Ca . Supervisor Clyde submitted a copy of subject report for filing and made a comment on a recommendation that there be a moratorium on increased student enrollment at UCSB so the problems are not compounded ' . Upon motion the Board adjourned sin e dje. The foregoing Minutes are hereby approved. , J . Clerk ' 184 Approval of Minutes of Oct. 19, 1970 Meeting. ' October 26, 1970 Board of Supervisors of the County. of ~ anta Barbara, State of California, October 26 , 1970, at 9:30 o ' clock , a .m. Present: Supervisors Georg ~ H. Clyde, Joe J . Callahan, Daniel G. Grant , Francis Ht Beattie1 and Curtis Tunnell; and J. E. Lewis 1 Clerk Supervisor Clyde in the Chair In the Matter of Approval of Mi nutes of October 19, 1970 Meeting . . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beatti e, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the reading of the minutes of the October 19, 1970 meeting be dispensed with, and t he minutes approved, as submitted. Resolution for In the Matter of Resolution of Intention for Proposed ArnExat ion of Waller Proposed Annexation of Park-Majestic Tract to County Service Area No . 5, Fifth Supervisori al District . Waller Park- Maj estic Trac Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried to Co. Svs. A ea 5 unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: Resolution fo Proposed Annexation of Park View Sub division ic Tract 11,089 to Co. Svs Ar a 5. Plans ic Specs for Transfer Sta Rd. Repa r ic Improvement RESOLUTION NO . 70-645 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILES) I In the Matter of Resolution of Intention for Proposed Annexation of Park View Subdi vi sion and Tract #11,089 to County Service Area No . 5 , Fifth Supervisorial District. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried I unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO . 70- 646 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILES) In the Matter of Approval of Plans and Specifications for Transfer Station Road Repair and Improvements , Santa Barbara . Upon motion of Supervi sor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that plans and specifications for "Transfer Station Road Repai r and Improvements, Santa Barbara" be, and the same are hereby, approved It is further ordered that Thursday, November 12, 1970, at 3 o ' clock, p .m. be, and the same is hereby, set as the date and time for the opening of bids on subject proposal, and that notice be given by publication in the Santa Barbara News -Press , a newspaper of general circulation, as follows, to-wit: NOTICE TO BIDDERS Notice is hereby given that the County of Santa Barbara will receive bi ds for,- ' 'TRANSFER STATION ROAD REPAIR AND IMPROVEMENTS , SANTA BARBARA, SANTA BARBA~ COUNTY, CALIFORNIA'' Each bi d wi ll be in accordance with drawings and specifications approved by the Board of Supervisors and on file in the OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, COUNTY ENGINEERING BUILDING, 123 EAST ANAPAMU STREET, SANTA BARBARA, CALIFORNIA, WHERE THEY MAY BE EXAMINED AND COPIES SECURED BY PROSPECTIVE BIDDERS . October 26, 1970 185 Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of Cali fornia (Amended by Statutes 1968, Chapter 699, Paragraph 1, operative July 1, 1969) the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara has directed the publishing of t he prevailing rate of wages with a copy of the same being on file at the office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors . EACH BID SHALL BE MADE OUT ON A FORM TO BE OBTAINED AT THE OFFI CE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS; shall be accompanied by a certified or cashi er ' s check or bid bond for ten (10) percent of the amount of the bid, made payable to the order of the Treasurer of Santa Barbara County, Santa Barbara, California; shall be sealed and received in the Office of the Clerk of the .Board of Supervisors of Santa Barbara County, County Administration Building, 105 East Anapamu Street, Santa Barbara, Californi a, 93104, on or before 3:00 P .M. on the 12th day of November, 1970, and will be opened and publicly read aloud at 3 :00 P .M. of the day in the Board of Supervisors ' Conference Room located on the 4th floor of the Santa Barbara County Administration Fairview Ave-Cathed al Oaks Rd. - Rezone I Building. The above mentioned check or bond shall be given as a guarantee that the bidder wi ll ent er into the contract i f awarded to him and will be declared forfeited if the successful bidder refuses to enter into said contract after bei ng requested so to do by the Board of Supervisors of said County. The Board of Supervisors of Santa Barbara County reserves the right to reject any or all bids or waive any informality in a bid No bidder may withdraw his bid for a period of thirty (30) days after the date set for the opening thereof Dated: October 26, 1970 J . E. LEWIS (SEAL) County Clerk Santa Barbara, California In the Matter of Planning Commission Recommendation for Adoption of Ordinance Amending Article IV of Ordinance No . 661 from Request of Board of Supervisors to Rezone Property Generally Located at Southeast Corner of Fairview Avenue and Cathedral Oaks Road, Goleta Valley from A- 1-X to 8-R-l or 10-R- l District Classifica~ tion. I Uponm:tion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that Monday, November 16, 1970, at 2 o ' clock, p.m. be, and the same i s hereby, set as the date and time for a hearing on recommendation of the Planning Commission to adopt an ordinance amending Article IV of Ordi nance No . 661 of the County of Santa Barbara, as amended, from request of the Board of Supervisors I to rezone property described as Assessor ' s Parcel Nos . 69- 090- 52, - 53, - 54, -56 and -57 generally located at the southeast corner of Fairview Avenue and Cathedral Oaks Road, Goleta Valley from the A- 1-X, Exclusive Agricultural District (permits certain agricultural uses on 5 acre building sites) to the 8- R-l, One-Family Residential District (permits one- family dwellings on 8,000 sq . ft . building sites), or to the 10- R-l, One-Family Residential District (permits one- family dwellings on 10,000 sq. ft . lots) of said ordinance, on the basis of the Report of Findings and Recommendation as set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No . 70-108, and that notice be given by publication in the Goleta Valley Sun, a newspaper of general circulation, as follows, to-wit: 186 Rezone certain areas of Cuy , Santa Maria, & Sisquoc, Lompo , & Guadalupe fo Creation of Agric. Preserv s. October 26 , 1970 Notice of Public Hearing on Planning Commission Recommendation for Adoption of Ordinance Amending Article PJ of Ordinance No . 661 from Request of Board of Supervisors to Rezone Property Generally Located at Southeast Corner of Fairview Avenue and Cathedral Oaks Road, Goleta Valley from A- 1-X to 8- R- l or 10- R- l District Classificati on. NOTICE is hereby given that a public heari ng will be held by t he Board of Supervi sors of the County of Santa Barbara , St at e of California on Monday, November 16 , 1970, at 2 o ' clock, p .m. in the Board of Supervisors Hearing Room, Fourth Floor, Cou~ty Admi nistration Building , City of Santa Barbara , State of Californi a , on recommendation of t he Planning Commission to adopt an ordinance amending Article IV of Ordinance No . 661 of the County of Santa Barbara , as amended, from request of the Board of Supervisors to rezone property des cribed as Assessor ' s Parcel Nos . 69-090- 52, -53 , -54 , -56 and -57 generally located at the southeast corner of Fairview Avenue and Cathedral Oaks Road, Goleta Valley from the A-1-X, Exclus ive Agricultural District (permits certain agricultural uses on 5 acre bui ldi ng sites) to the 8-R-l, One-Family Residential District (permits one-famil y dwellings on 8 ,000 sq. ft . buildi ng sites), or t o t he 10- R-l, One-Family Residential District (permits one-family dwellings on 10,000 sq . ft . lots) of s aid ordi nance , on the basis of t he Report of Findings and RecoIJ]1llendation as set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No . 70-108 . WITNESS my hand and seal this 26th day of October, 1970 J . E. LE.WIS (SEAL) J . E. LEWIS, Count y Clerk and Ex-Officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors It is further ordered that subject proposal be, and the same is hereby, referred t o the County Counsel for preparation of the appropriate ordinance . In t he Matter of Planning Commission and Agricul tural Preserve Advisory Committee Recommendations for Adoption of Ordinance Amendi ng Article IV of Ordinance No . 661 to Rezone Certain Properties in Cuyama, Santa Maria & Sisquoc, Lompoc, and Guadalupe; and Creation of Agricultural Preserves . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by S ervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that Monday, November 16, 1970, at 2 o ' clock, p . m. be, and the same is hereby, set as t he date and time for a public hearing on recommendati ons of t he Planning Commission and Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee to adopt an ordinance amendi ng Article IV of Ordinance No . 661 of the County of Santa Barbara , as amended, to rezone the following properties, on the basis t hat they conform t o the General Plan of the County, and t o approve applications to create agricultural preserves on said properties under the pr ovisions of Chapter 1443, Statutes of 1965, known as t he California Land Conservation Act, from a land use standpoint , on t he basis that they conform .to the criteria established by the Board of Supervisors of Santa Barbara County: October 26 , 1970 1 1) J ohn T. Rickard on behalf of Spanish Ranch, Cuyama (70-AP-40 & 70 - RZ - 67), rezone from ''U'' - Unlimited Agricultural District to the 100-AG, Gener al Agricultural District Clas s ification, per Planning Commission Resolution No . 70-98. 187 1 2) J ohn T. Rickard on behalf of Rinconada Ranch, Cuyama (70- AP-41 & 70- RZ- 67), rezone from ''U" - Unlimited Agricultural District to the 100- AG, General Agricultural District Classification, per Planning Commission Resolution No . 70 - 98 . 1 3) Gilio DeBernardi (70-AP-44A & 70-RZ- 72), Lompoc, rezone from 10- AG, General Agricultural District to 40-AG, General Agricultural Di strict Classification, per Planning Commission Resolution No . 70 - 103. f 4) Gilio DeBernardi (70-AP-44B & 70- RZ- 72) , Lompoc, rezone for ''U'' - Unlimited Agricultural District to 100-Ag, General Agricultural District Classification, per planning Commission Resolutior No . 70- 103 . 15) John Gill, Bank of America NT & SA on behalf of William A. Rennie Trust (70- AP -47 & 70- RZ - 76), Lompoc, rezone from 20-AG, General Agricultural District to 100-AG, General Agricultural District Classification, per Planning Commission Resolution No . 70 -104 / 6) Stella Lanini (70-AP-48 & 70- RZ- 77) , Guadalupe, rezone from ''U'' - Unlimited Agricultural District to 40- AG, General Agricultural District Classification, per Planning Commission Resolution No . 70 - 107. It is further ordered that notice be given by publication in the Santa Maria Times, a newspaper of general circulation, as follows, to-wit: Notice of Public Hearing on Recommendations of the Planning Commission and Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee to Adopt an Ordinance Amending Article IV of Ordinance No . 661 of the County of Santa Barbara. NOTICE is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California on Monday , November 16, 1970, at 2 o ' clock, p .m. , in the Board of Supervisors Hearing Room, Fouth Floor, County Administration Building, City of Santa Barbara, State of California, on recommendations of t he Planning Commissi on and Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee to adopt an ordi nance amending Article IV of Ordinance No. 661 of the County of Santa Barbara, as amended, to rezone the following properties, on the basis that they conform to the General Plan of the County, and to approve applicptions to create agricultural preserves on said properties under the provisions of Chapter 1443, Statutes of 1965, known as the Californi a Land Conservation Act, from a land use standpoint, ' on the basi s that they conform to the criteria established by the Board of Supervisors of Santa Barbara County: 1) John T. Rickard on behalf of Spanish Ranch, Cuyama (70-AP- 40 and / 70-RZ-67), rezone from ''U'' - Unlimited Agricultural District to the 100-AG, General Agricultural Distri ct Classification, per Planning Commission Resolution No . 79- 98 . ; 2) John T. Rickard on behalf of Rinconada Ranch, Cuyama (70-AP- 41 and 70- RZ- 67), rezone from ''U'' - Unlimited Agricultural District to the 100-Ag, General Agricultural District Classification, per Planning Commission Resolution No . 70-98 . 188 Agreement b Co. " State Forester to Provide Fire Protection o Lands in Zon s 1 " 2 in Fy 1970-71. I Resolution Annexing Territory to Co. Svs Area 3 -Goleta Vall I Co. of S.B. " Resources " Collection - recover moni owed Co. for minors I October 26, 1970 I 3) Gilio DeBernardi (70-AP-44A and 70-RZ-72), Lompoc, rezone from 10-AG , General Agricultural District to 40-AG, General Agricultural District Classification, per Planning Commission Resolution No . 70-103. ; 4) Gilio DeBernardi (70-AP-44B and 70-RZ-72), Lompoc, rezone from un - Unlimited Agricultural District to 100-AG, General Agricultural District Classification, per Planning Commission Resolution No. 70-103. / 5) John Gill, Bank of America NT&SA on behalf of William A. Rennie Trust (70-AP-47 and 70-RZ-76), Lompoc, rezone 20-AG, General Agricultural District to 100-AG, General Agricultural District Classification, per Planning Commission Resolution No . 70-104 . Stella Lanini (70-AP- 48 and 70-RZ-77) , Guadalupe, rezone from ''U'' - Unlimited Agricultural District to 40-AG, General Agricultural District Classification, per Planning Commission Resolution No 70-107. WITNESS my hand and seal this 26th day of October, 1970 J. E. LEwts. County clerk and Ex-Officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors It is further ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to County Counsel for preparation of the appropriate documents. In the Matter of Execution of Agreement between the County of Santa Barbara and State Forester to Provide Fire Protection on Lands in Zone One & Zone Two during FY 1970-71 . I Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO . 70-647 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILES) In the Matter of Resolution Annexing Territory to County Service Area No . . 3 in Goleta Valley, Santa Barbara County (Lakeside Mobile Home Park) . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO . 70-648 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILES) It is further ordered that Resolution No . 218 of LAFCO approving annexation be, and the same is hereby, placed on file . (100% consent petition) In the Matter of Resolution Authorizing the County Counsel and Director of Department of Resources and Collections to File Suits to Recover Monies Owed the County for the Care & Maintenance of Minors in County Institutions. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the fo l lowing resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO . 70 - 649 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILES) Director of Dept. of Resources ~ Collections-recover monies owed Co. for Minors. I Easement Deed from William H. Yule, Jr - Arlene A. Yule fo Flood ControlGobernador Creek, Parcel 2.1. / October 26, 1970 In the Matter of Resolution Authorizing the Director of Department of Resources and Collections to Institute Necessary Proceedings to Recover Monies Owed the Count y for Care and Mai ntenance of Mi nor Chil dren i n Count y I nstitutions . Upon motion of Supervi sor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beatti e, and carr i ed unanimously , the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESQLtrfIQN NO . 70- 650 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILES) 189 In the Matter of Acceptance of Easement Deed from William H. Yule , Jr . and Arlene A. Yule for Flood Control Purposes, Gobernador Creek, Parcel 2 .1 (Folio No . 568) , wi thout Monetary Consideration . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Easement Deed from William H. Yule , Jr., a married man, an undivided one- half interest, and Arlene A. Yule, a married woman, an undivided one- half interest, dated October 19, 1970, for flood control purposes, Gobernador Cree First Supervisorial Distrfct, Parcel 2.1 (Folio No . 568) be, and the same is hereby, accepted It is further ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the S. B. County Flood Control & Water Conservation District for acceptance prior to recordation. Easement Deeds fro In the Matter of Acceptance of Easement Deeds from Santa Maria Public Air- S .M. Public Airport District for Flood port District without Monetary Consideration for Flood Control Purposes , Industrial Control, Industrial . Park, Tract #5011. Park, Tract #5011, Folio No . 579 . I S.M. Airport Dist.Quitclaim Deed fro Co. - Santa Barbara Co. Flood Control Dist. I Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carr i ed unani mously , i t i s ordered that three Easement Deeds from the Santa Maria Publ i c Airport District, a state agency of the State of California for flood control purposes, Industrial Park, Tract #5011, Folio No . 579 be, and the same are hereby, accepted, without monetary consideration. (Exchange of flood control easements) It is furt her ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the S. B. County Flood Control & Wat er Conservati on District for acceptance prior to recordati on . . In the Matter of Authorizing Recordation of Quitclaim Deed from the County of Santa Barbara and Santa Barbara County Flood Control & Water Conservation District t o the Santa Maria Public Airport District for Flood Control Purposes, Industrial Park, Tract #5011, Folio No . 579 . Upon motion of Supervisor unanimously, it is ordered t hat the Grant, seconded by Supervi sor Beattie, and carrieJ Clerk be, and he is hereby, authorized and directetl to record the Quitclaim Deed, dated March 18, 1968 , from the County of Santa Barbara and Santa Barbara County Flood Control & Water Conservation Distri ct for f lood cont rol purposes, Industrial Park, Tract #5011, Folio No . 579 in connection with exchange of flood control easements, in the office of the Santa Barbara County Recorder . I I Reference is made to action taken by the Board of Supervisors as well as Flood Control Distri ct on March 18 , 1968, to authori ze the execution of said Quitclaim, Deed, but recordation was withheld until the three Easement Deeds were received from t he Santa Maria Public Airport District for acceptance thi s date . ' . ' 190 Filing Notic of Completio for Comfort Sta., Hans Christian Andersen Par , Solvang. I Right of Way Contract btw Co. " Audrey Allen Gaines Constr. of Phelps Rd. Elwood Acres I Acceptance o Grant Deed from Audrey Allen Gaines re Constr. of Phelps Rd Elwood Acres. J Grant Deed to Audrey Allen Gaines re Const. of Phelps Rd.Elwood Acres . ' Acceptance of Right of Way Grant from Robert A. Felburg et ux for Cat Canyo Rd. I ------~-- ~- October 26, 1970 In the Matter of Filing of Notice of Completion for Construction of Comfort Station, Hans Christian Andersen Park, Solvang . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Director of Public Works be, and he is hereby, . authorized and directed to file a Notice of Completion for ''Construction of Comfort Station, Hans Christian Andersen Park, Solvang'' . It is further ordered that the Clerk be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to record said document in the office of the Santa Barbara County Recorder . In the Matter of Execution of Right of Way Contract between the County of Santa Barbara and Audrey Allen Gaines in Connection with Construction of Phelps Road, Elwood Acres Assessment District No . 2, Parcel 3049 . 1-2. I Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervi sor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is order ed that the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute a Right of Way Contract, dated October 26 , 1970, between the County of Santa Barbara and Audrey Allen Gaines in connection with construction of Phelps Road, Elwood Acres Assessment District No . 2, Job No . 3049 .1. In the Matter of Acceptance of Grant Deed from Audrey Allen Gaines Concerning Construction of Phelps Road, Elwood Acres Assessment District No . 2, Job No . 3049 .1, Third Supervisorial District, in Consideration of $547 . 47 . I Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Grant Deed, dated October 15, 1970, from Audrey I Allen Gaines, a married woman dealing in her ~eparate property, relative to construction of Phelps Road, Elwood Acres Assessment District No . 2, Job No . 3049 . 1 , Thi rd Supervisorial District be, and the same is hereby, accepted by the County . It is further ordered that the County Auditor be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to draw a warrant on Road Fund Account 140 B 24, in the amount of $547 . 47, payable to Audrey Allen Gaines, as payment for the land secured. It is further ordered that the Clerk be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to record said document in the offi ce of the Santa Barbara County Recorder . In the Matter of Execution of Grant Deed to Audrey Allen Gaines Relative to Construction of Phelps Road, Elwood Acres Assessment District No . 2, Job No . 3049.1, Third Supervisorial District . Upon m~tion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is order dered that the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute a Grant Deed, dated October 26, 1970, .to Audrey Allen Gaines, a married woman as her separate property, for construction of Phelps Road, Elwood Acres Assessment District No . 2, Job No . 3049 .1, Third Supervisorial District; and the Clerk be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to ~ r ansmit said document to the Road Department to send to Mrs. Gaines . In the Matter of Acceptance of Right of Way Grant from Robert A. Felburg, et ux, for Cat Canyon Road, Fifth Supervisorial District, without Monetary Considerat i on. Authorization to Acquire Easement for Cathedral Oaks Rd FAS Project No. 3026.1 I Co . Auditpr Directed to Draw Warrants Pursuant to Right of Way Contracts for Constr. of Brown Rd. I I Releasing 85% Rd. Improvement Bond Dedication of Streets for Tract #10,913, Unit 2. I Releasing Rd. Improvement Bond for Inside Paving on Tract #10,913, Uni 191 October 26, 1970 Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Right of Way Grant, dated October 19, 1970, from Robert A. Felburg and Norma Felburg be, and the same is hereby, accepted, without monetary consideration, for Cat Canyon Road, Fifth Supervisorial District; and the Clerk be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to record said document in the office of the Santa Barbara County Recorder. In the Matter of Authorizing Road Commissioner to Acquire Necessary Easement for Cathedral Oaks Road F.A.S. Project No . 3026 .1 which Lies within La Patera Cattle Co . and Stow Ranch Co . Agricultural Preserve, Third Supervisorial District. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimous ly , it is ordered that the Road Commissioner be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to proceed with the acquisition of the necessary easement for Cathedral Oaks F.A. S. Project No . 3026.1, which lies within La Patera Cattle Co . Agricultural Preserve, Third Supervisorial District, pursuant to Government Code Section 51923(b) . In the Matter of Directing County Auditor to Draw Warrants Pursuant to Right of Way Contracts for Construction of Brown Road, Fifth Supervisorial District, Job No . 5016 . 2 . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the County Auditor be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to draw two warrants on Road Fund Account 140 B 24 made payable respectively to Ronald L. Acquis t apace , in the amount of $1,105. 00, and Clarence Minetti, i n the amount of $3,772 .60 as payments pursuant to agreements made in Right of Way Contracts executed September 1 , 1970, by Eugene Rene LeRoy, Mr . Minetti's lessors ; and September 4, 1970, by Ronald L . Acquistapace, et ux, for additional right of way needed for the construction of Brown Road, Fifth Supervisorial District. In the Matter of Releasing 85% of Road Improvement Bond and Dedication of Streets for Tract #10 ,913 , Unit #2 . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that 85% of the following road improvement bond for Tract #10,913 , #2 be released, or if a separate bond in the amount of 15% of the road improvement bond is posted, all of the original bond may be exonerated, as provided in Ordinance No . 1358; and the dedicated streets in the subdivision be, and the same are hereby, accepted , as recommended by the Road Commissioner: Pacific Employers Insurance Company, as Surety - Eli Luria dba Development Co. and Howland and Rice, Inc . , dated March 4, 1970, in the original amount of $9,000.00 In the Matter of Releasing Road Improvement Bond for Inside Road Paving on Tract #10,913 , Unit #2. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the following road improvement bond for inside road paving on Tract #10,913, Unit #2 be, and the same is hereby, released as to all 192 ' Change Order 2 - Nicholas Lane Project ' October 26, 1970 future acts and conditions, as the required certification that the private roads have been constructed to County standards: Pacific Employers Insurance Company, as Surety - Eli Luria dba Luria Development Company, and Howland and Rice, Inc . , dated March 9, 1970, in the amount of $24,000. 00 . In the Matter of Authorizing Chairman to Execute Change Order No . 2 to Nicholas Lane Project No . 1032. 2 for Increase of $3,164 . 43 . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to execute balancing Change Order No . 2 to contract with E. H. Haskell Company, for total increase of $3,164. 43 . Change Order In the Matter of Authorizing Chairman to Execute Change Order No . 1 for l - Overlay on Constella ion Overlay on Constellation Road and Foster Road Project Nos . 4047 . 2 and 5038 . 2 for Rd. " Foster Project Increase of $239 . 58 . I Ordinance No. 2126- re speed limits on certain roads. I Resolution Establishing a Through St. (Brandon Dr.) J Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and car- 1 ried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to execute a balancing Change Order No . 1 to contract with A. J . Diani Construct ion Co . , Inc . for total increase of $239 . 58 . In the Matter of Ordinance No . 2126 - An Ordinance Amending the Code of Santa Barbara County, California, Regarding Speed Limits on Certain County Roads as Approved by Traffi c Engineering Committee on October 7, 1970 . (Fairview Avenue, Cathedral Oaks Road, and Stow Canyon Road) Upon mot ion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the Board passed and adopted Ordinance No . 2126, entitled ''An Ordinance Amending the Code of Santa Barbara County, California, Regarding Speed Limits on Certain County Roads'' . Upon the roll being called, the following Supervisors voted Aye, to-wit : George H. Clyde, Joe J . Callahan, Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell . NOES: None . ABSENT: None . The above were approved by the Traffic Engineering Committee at its meeting of October 7, 1970, and involves 35 m.p .h. speed limit at Fairvie"\'1 Avenue and Cathedral Oaks Road as an addition and deletion of Fairvi ew Avenue and Stow Canyon Road. In the Matter of Resolution Establishi ng a Through Street in Third Supervisorial District as Approved by Traffic Engineering Committee on October 7, 1970. (Brandon Drive) Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the Board passed and adopted the following resolution, as approved by the Traffic Engineering Committee on October 7, 1970: RESOLUTION NO . 70 - 651 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILES) I 193 October 26, 1970 Resolution establi h- In the Matter of Resolution Establishi ng ''No Parking Zones" on Portions ing No Parking Zon s on Puente Drive of Puente Drive, a County Highway in Third Supervisorial District as Approved by I Traffic Engineering Committee on October 7, 1970 . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted, as approved by the Traffic Engineering Committee on October 7, 1970: RESOLUTION NO . 70- 652 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILES) Resolution Establi h- In the Matter of Resolution Establishing Stop Intersections in Fifth Supering Stop Intersect ons in 5th Dist. I visorial District as Approved by Traffic Engineering Committee on October 7, 1970 . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted, covering Oak Knoll Road and Patterson Road; Patterson Road and Oak Knoll Road; and four- 't-7ay stop inter- I section of Oak Knoll Road and Royal Oak Road, as approved by the Traffic Engineering Committee on October 7, 1970 : RESOLUTION NO , 70- 653 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILES) Filing Notice of Completion for Constr. of Improve ments on Dominion / d. In the Matter of Filing of Notice of Completion for Constructi on of Impro\e - ments on Dominion Road (from 0 . 39 Miles North of Orcutt-Garey Road to State Hi ghway Release of Co. Cla for Dam.ages to Co. Property resulting from Vehicular Accident I Release $1,000 Bon .posted for Occupanrhl' of Studio, Pending Erection of Singie Family Dwelling by Otis Royer. I 176) . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Road Commissioner be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to file a Notice of Completion for contract on construction of improvements on Dominion Road (from 0 . 39 miles north of Orcutt-Garey Road to State Highway 176); and the Clerk be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to record said document in the office of the Santa Barbara County Recorder . In t he Matter of Execution of Release of All County Claims for Damages to County Property Resulting from Vehicular Accident , in the Amount of $233 . 00 . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie , and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute a Release of all County claims for damages to County property resulting from a vel1icular accident, as follo't'1S: Dallas Ray McCall, in the amount of $233 .00, for accident on February 17, 1969 In the Matter of Recommendation of Planning Director to Release $1,000 Bond Posted for Occupancy of Studio, Pending Erection of Single Family Dwelling by Otis Royer, 898 Toro Canyon Road (69-CP-72) . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the following bond posted for occupancy by Otis Royer of a studio pending erection of a single family dwelling at 898 Toro Canyon Road (69-CP-72) be, and tl1e same is hereby released as to all future acts and conditions, as recommended by the Planning Director: 194 Release of Landscape and/or Street Planting Bon I October 26, 1970 Industrial Indemnity Company, as Surety - Otis F. Royer, as Principal, for Bond No . YS 645-1734, dated January 9, 1970, in the amount of $1,000.00 In the Matter of Recommendations of County Landscape Architect for Release of Landscape and/or Street Tree Planting Bonds. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the following landscape and/or street tree planting bonds be, and the same are hereby, released as to all future acts and conditions, as recommended by the County Landscape Architect: 1 Fireman's Fund American Insurance Company, as Surety - Goleta Valley Development Company, a Partnership, as Principal, for Bond No . SCR - 707 28 66, dated December 10, 1969, in the amount of $757 . 50, for street tree planting. Tract 10, 699, Unit 2 ; Pacific Employers Insurance Company, as Surety - Eli Luria dba Luria Development Company, as Principal, for Bond No . M-138, 729, dated May 29, 1969, in the amount of $10,000.00, for landscaping in Tract #10, 913, Pebble Creek Townhouses (68-M-115) . 1The Travelers Indemnity Company, as Surety - John S. J Carter and Lowell C. Cates, as Principal, for Bond No . 1578252, dated August 28, 1969, in the amount of $7,000. 00. Plaza Realty (69-RZ-33) Pacific Indemnity Company, as Surety - Standard Oil Company of California, as Principal, for Bond No . 321711, dated November 5, 1965, in the amount of $1,000. 00. Carpinteria (69- CP -13) In the Matter of Acceptance of $25 Donation from Santa Barbara Uptown Lions for Juvenile Hall Discretionary Fund. $25 Donation from S.B. Up town Lions for Juvenile Hall Discret onary Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and car- Fund. J Appointment ried unanimously, it is ordered that the $25 .00 donation received from the Santa Barbara Uptown Lions for the Juvenile Hall Discretionary Fund be, and the same is hereby, accepted, for deposit to the Probation Officer ' s Trust Fund. In the Matter of Approval of Request of Santa Barbara General Hospital of Drs. Rich rd J. Magenheim r, Medical Director for Appointment of Drs. Richard J . Magenheimer, Stephen E. Stevens, Stephen E. Stevens, Cha les Charles H. Branch, and Richard T. Love to Medical Staff. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and car- H. Branch, ~ Richard T. L ve to Medical S af f at S.B. Genl ried unanimously, it is ordered that the request of the Santa Barbara General Hospital Hosp. Medical Director to approve applications for appointment to the Medical Staff for the following be, and the same is hereby, aP.proved: Dr . Richard J . Magenheimer Dr . Stephen E. Stevens Dr. Charles H. Branch Dr. Richard T. Love Openin~ of Bids for Sa le & Issuance f 35 Promissor No t es of S.B. Co for A~gre~ate Sum of $3, 500, 000. 00 I Book 138 Pa~e 195 In the Matter of Opening of Bids for Sale and Issuance of 35 Promissory Notes of Santa Barbara County for Aggregate Sum of $3,500,000.00. This being the date and time set for the opening of bids on subject proposal; the County Treasurer having solicited bids through a notice inviting bids; and there being six (6) bids received, the Clerk proceeded to open bids from: 1) Bank of America NT&SA - 3 . 69%, par plus premiun of $3,000, $20,097.00 net interest cost . 2) First Western Bank - 3 . 7%, par plus premium of $7 .00, $20,464 .11 net interest cost . 3) Security-Pacific National Bank - 3.69%, par, no premium, $20,090.00 net interest cost. 4/ United California Bank - 4 . 25% par, no premium, $23,138 . 89 net interest cost . 5) Wells Fargo Bank - 3 . 40%, par plus premium of $40 . 00, $18,471 .11 net interest cost . 6) Crocker-Citizens National Bank - 4 . 00%, par plus premium of $1 . 00, $21,776.77 net interest cost. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the County Counsel and County Treasurer for report and recommendation. Waiver of Physical Requirements. / October 26, 1970 In the Matter of Approval of Request f or Waiver of Physical Requirements for Prospective Employees . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and car- . . 195 ried unanimously, it is ordered that the following requests for waiver of the physical requirements for prospective employees be, and the same are hereby, approved : J Harley Dennis, Grounds Maintenance Man, Park Department . J Kenneth Barton , Jr . , Grounds Maintenance Man, Park Department. I Pauline Hinton, Maid, Santa Barbara General Hospital . Claim Against Co. In the Matter of Claim Against the County from Attorney Kenneth M. Byrum by Community Natl Bank, Bakersfield, on Behalf of Community National Bank, of Bakersfield, in the Amount of $8,674 . 73, for Proposed Sale of Personal Proper y for Proposed Sale of Personal Property by Tax Collector. by Tax Collector. / Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimous ly, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to County Counsel and insurance carrier . Riders to Oil In the Matter of Reconunendation of County Petroleum Engineer for Approval Drilling Bonds and or Release of Ride s of Riders to Oil Drilling Bonds and/or Release of Riders and/or Oil Drilling Bonds . and/or Oil Driliin Bonds. / Pursuant to the reconunendation of the County Petroleum Department and in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance No . 1927; Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that riders to the following oil drilling bonds be, and the same are hereby, approved: / Getty Oil Company - Argonaut Insurance Company Rider #56 to Blanket Bond No . 055133 covering well ''Williams Holding 85-25'' , County Permit 413492 . / Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company - Continental Oil Company rider to Blanket Bond #3507930 covering well "Goodwin 5'', County Permit No . 3493 . ; Pacific Indemnity Company - Standard Oil Company rider to Blanket Bond No . 119594 covering 't11ill ''Tognazzini 2'' , County Permit No . 1033 . , Pacific Indemnity Company-Atlantic Richfield Company rider to Blanket Bond No . 203679 covering wells ''Hibberd 88- 36'' , County Permit No . 1376, ''Hibberd Well 57- 36'', County Permit No . 2135, and ''SCU 10-36'', County Permit No. 1332 It is further ordered that riders, as follows, on same be, and the same are hereby released as to all future acts and conditions: .1' 'Hibberd 88- 36'' 't11as known as ''Hibberd 288- 36'' and the ' rider approved on April 30, 1956. Prior to its being prograanned as ''Hibberd 288- 36'', the well was kno'tm as ''Hibberd 88- 36'' and a rider approved on April 24, 1950, and released on April 30, 1956. 196 Publication of Ordinance 2122. { Reports and Communicatio s. J October 26, 1970 ; ''Hibberd Well 5 7- 36'' was previously known as ''Hu No . 57- 36'' and approved by the Board on December 13, 1954. )'SCU ffol0-36'' loJas previously known as ''s .c.u. No . llA- 36", rider to be released approved on May 12, 1959 . , It is further order ed that the Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company Bond 1fo3282493 covering well ''Covarrubias 2- 3'', County Permit No . 3103 for Blue Opal Oil Company be, and the same is hereby, released as to all future acts and conditions . 1 In the Matter of Publication of Ordinance No . 2122 . It appearing to the Principal Clerk of the Santa Maria Times that Ordinance No . 2122 has been duly published in the manner and form prescribed by law; Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is determined that Ordinance No . 2122 has been duly published in the manner and form prescribed by law . In the Matter of Reports and Communications . The following reports and communications were received by the Board and ordered placed on fil e: JLAFCO Resolution 219 approving annexation of El Capitan Ranch to Goleta County Water District . 1 Health Department - Jail Standards Evaluation Form for September 17, 1970 inspection of Santa Maria City Jail, and October 15th & 16th, 1970 inspection of I Santa Barbara County Jail, Sheriff ' s Honor Farm and / New Detention Correction Facility Kitchen. 1 Resolution No. 323 of Carpinteria City Council approving and annexing ''Bailard Annexation No . 8'' . ~Resolution of Napa City Council re lack of evidence of duplication of county functions by Napa County Council for Economic Opportunity . / Public Utilities Commission - notice of hearing on application of Golden West Airline, Inc . for Certifi cate of Public Convenience and necessity to provide air passenger service to and from Santa Maria Airport, October 29, 1970 at 10 a .m. , City Hall, Santa Maria. ; Public Utilities Commission - application of Air West, Inc . for authority to cancel certain intra California excursion tariffs and on application to increase fares , November 23, 1970 at 10 a .m. , San Francisco . 1 State Board of Equalization - statement of local tax distribution, retail sales, October 13, 1970, $55,000. 00 . Reports from Planning Co ssion for Info Onl In the Matter of Reports from Planning Commission for Information Only. The following Planning Commission reports were received for information only and ordered placed on file: Appeal of Herman W. Caylin Bill Marcbiando to rezone property l/5th Mile West of Ballard Canyon Rd. approx. l~ Miles Northerly from Chalk Hill Rd, Solvang area. I October 26, 1970 / Granted Conditional Use Permit on request of Albert Hugo (70-CP-58) to validate temporary occupancy of trailer during construction of dwelling at 7331 Shepard Mesa Road, Carpinteria. / Granted Conditional Use Permit on request of J ohn C. Harlan (70-CP-60) to allow temporary use of existi ng dwelling (90 days) duri ng construction of new dwelling at 5375 Dorwin Lane, .More Mesa . ; Denied request of Utaka Hayashi (70-V-54) for Conditional Exception to allow use of trailer as single family dwelling at 4395 South Blosser Road, Orcutt. In the Matter of Appeal of Herman W. Caylin and Bill Marchiando from Planning Conunission Deni al of Request (70-RZ-78) to Adopt an Ordinance Amendi ng Article IV of Ordinance No . 661 to Rezone Property Generally Located l/5th Mi le West of Ballard Canyon Road Approximately 1-1/2 Miles Northerly from Chalk Hill Road, Solvang Area from the 20-AG to 5-AG District Classification. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that Monday, November 16, 1970, at 2 o 'clock, p .m. be , and the same is hereby, set as the date and time for a public hearing on the appeal of Herman W. Caylin and Bill Marchiando from Planning Conunission denial of request (70-RZ-78) to initiate an ordinance amending Article IV of Ordinance No . 197 661 of the County of Santa Barbara , as amended, to rezone property described as Assessor ' s Parcel No . 137-010-19 and western portion of Assessor ' s Parcel No . 137- 010-23 , generally located l / 5th mile west of Ballard Canyon Road approximat ely 1-1/2 mi les northerly from Chal k Hill Road, Solvang area from the 20 -AG, General Agricultural District which permits general agricultural uses on 20'-acre bui ldi ng s ites, t o the 5- AG , General Agricultural District which permits agricultural uses on 5- ' acre building sites, on the basis that the topography of the area is not suitable for unrestricted 5- acre development and a better indication of possible development, if rezoned , is needed, and that notice be given by publication in the Santa Barbara News-Press , a newspaper of general circulation, as follows, to-wit: Notice of Public Hearing on Appeal of Herman W. Caylin and Bill Marchiando from Planning Commission Denial of Request (70-RZ-78) to Adopt an Ordinance Amending Article IV of Ordinance No . 661 to Rezone Property in Solvang Area . NOTICE is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Board of Supervi sors of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California on Monday, November 16, 1970, at 2 o ' clock, p .m., in the Board of Supervisors Hearing Room, Fourth Floor, County Administration Building, City of Santa Barbar a , State of California, on the appeal of Herman W. Caylin and Bill Marchiando from Planning Conunission denial of request (70 - RZ-78) to initiate an ordinance amending Article IV of Ordinance No . 661 of the County of Santa Barbara , as amended , to rezone property described as Assessor ' s Parcel No . 137-010-19 and western portion of Assessor ' s Parcel No . 137- 010- 23, generally located l/5th mile west of Ballard Canyon Road approximately 1-1/2 r-----------.----------------------------------------------.---~- -- --~ - 1.98 October 26, 1970 mi les northerly from Chalk Hill Road, Solvang area from the 20-AG, General Agricultural District which permits general agricultural uses on 20-acre building sites, to the 5-AG, General Agricultural District which permits agricultural uses on 5-acre building sites, on the basis that the topography of the area is not suitable for unrestricted 5- acre development and a better indication of possible development, if rezoned, is needed . WITNESS my hand and seal this 26th day of October, 1970 J . E. LEWIS (SEAL) Sale ic Issua ce In the Matter of the Sale and Issuance of 35 Promissory Notes of Santa of 35 Prom.is Notes of SB oryBarbara County . Co. I . Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously , the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO . 70 - 654 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILES) Approval of In the Matter of Planning Connnission Reconnnendation for Approval of Ten- Tentative Ma of Tract #ll 225tative Map of Tract #11,225 Generally Located Approximately 500 Feet Westerly of I Salaries I Kingston Avenue on South Side of Calle Real and Adjacent to U. S. Highway 101, Third Supervisorial District . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, continued to Monday, l\ovember 9, 1970 at the request of the developer . In the Matter of Allowance of Positions , Disallowance of Positions, and Fixing of Compensation for Monthly Salaried Positions . (Effect ive November 1, 1970, Merit Increases and other Personnel Actions of Welfare and Road Departments , Personnel, Co. AuditorController to Correct Recor s of Certain Employees of Welfare Dept. J and County Clerk) Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO . 70- 655 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILES) In the Matter of Directi ng County Auditor-Controller to Correct Records of Certain Employees of the Welfare Department and Make Salary Payments whi ch Should Have Been Provided on April 1 , 1970. The Director of Personnel submitted subject request following receipt of County Counsel ' s written Legal Opinion No . 1640 stating that the Board of Supervisors has t he power to correct the records of an employee on a retroactive basis to reflect the true fac t s concerni ng an employee ' s salary, under appropri ate circumst ances . Reference is made to Board action on February 24, 1970 approving recommendation of I ' Salaries Salaries Salaries I October 26, 1970 199 the Administrative Officer t o establish a new salary on promotion policy and to adjust the salaries and/or anniversary dates of certain i ndividual s who were pro moted prior to the adoption of Resolution No . 69- 406 . There were several instances where there was f ailure to apply the approved procedure i n adjusting the s alaries and anniversary dates of persons that were promoted between January 1, 1967 and August 1, 1969 . There were 11 cases from the Welfare Department where it is evident that these empl oyees were not adjusted in accordance wi th t he approved procedure when salaries were adjusted effect ive April 1 , 1970 . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant , seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the County Auditor- Control ler, under Ordinance No . 2041 be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to correct the r ecords of the fo l lowing employees and pay the amount of sal ary they shoul d have been provided on April 1 , 1970: Name of Employee Bodine, Mark Reno, Penny Rickett s, Nancy Roders, Margaret Swartout, Wyvetta Copeland, Hel en Eastin, Sandra Mosley, Amanda Tatum, Patricia Pirie , Ann Rottger, Erika Classification Sr. Social Worker Sr. Soci al Worker Sr. Social Worker Sr. Social Worker Sr. Social Worker (See Resolution No . 70 - 654 ) Sr. Social Worker Sr. Social Worker Sr. Social Worker Sr. Soci al Worker Sr. Social Worker Sr. Soci al Worker Recommendati on Approve Co l tnnn D, establish April 1st as anniversary date and pay an adjusted salary of $280 for each employee Establish April 1st as anniversary date and pay an adjusted sal ary of $228 for each employee Establish April 1st as anniversary date for meri t i ncrease purposes It is further ordered that the Director of Personnel be, and he is hereby, I aut horized and directed to correct those employees ' personnel records to reflect the appropriate employee status In the Matter of Allowance of Positions, Disallowance of Positi ons, and Fixi ng of Compensation for Monthly Salaried Pos i tions . (Eff ective October 26, 1970, Welfare Department) Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopt ed: RESOLtrrION NO . 70- 656 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILES) - In the Matter of Allowance of Positions, Disallowance of Positions, and I Fixing of Compensati on for Monthly Salaried Positions . (Effective November 2 , 1970, I Sheriff & Coroner) , Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously , the fo llowing resol ution was passed and adopted : RESOLUTION NO . 70 - 65Z (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILES) In the Matter of All owance of Positions, Disal l owance of Positions, and Fixing of Compensation for Monthly Salaried Positions . (Effective November 9, 1970 , Sheriff & Coroner) 200 Proposed Expansion of CSAC Directo_ ships. / Revision of ''LEMRAS'' Agreement wi IBM Corp. I Placement of $20,000 Performance Bon to Cover Mil - t ary Equipme t Loaned to Co during Civil Disobedience Situations. I Awarding Bid fer Painting Portions of S.B. Co. Cou t House. ' October 26 , 1970 Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, the following resol ution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO . 70- 658 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILES) In the Matter of Proposed Expansion of CSAC Directorships . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it i s ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, removed from the agenda. In the Matter of Revision of ''LEMRAS'' (Law Enforcement Manpower Resource Allocation System) Agreement with IBM Corporation. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, continued to Monday, November 2, 1970, at the reques t of the Administrative Officer. In the Matter of Recommendation of Administrative Officer for Approval of Placement of $20,000 Performance Bond, Sheriff-Coroner, to Cover Military Equipment Loaned to County during Civil Disobedience Situations . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the recommendation of the Administrative Officer for placement of a $20,000 performance bond to cover military equipment loaned to the County during civil disobedience situations be, and the same is hereby, confirmed, as requested of the Sheriff- Coroner by the State Military Department, for compliance with State regulations . The purpose of the bond is to cover damage to or the loss of equipment loaned to and under the control of the Sheriff. It is further ordered that the Administrative Officer execute the applicable documents . The placement of the bond is for a one-year term renewable annually. In the Matter of Awarding Bid for Painting Portions of the Santa Barbara County Court House, Santa Barbara . The Affidavit of Publication being on file with the Clerk, the following bids were opened at a meeting held on October 22, 1970; the roll was called, and the following officials were present: Don Vickers, Deputy County Counsel, Vernon Bugh, Public Works Department, Supervisor Joe J . Callahan, and J . E. Lewis, Clerk: Sidney Smith E. A. Wopschall, Inc . John Schaaf Base Bid $12,980.00 $14,791.00 $11,400.00 Alternate ffal $6,600. 00 $8,396.00 $6,920.00 The engineer ' s estimate was $12,000.00 on the base bid, and $3,000.00 for . Alternate No . 1 . Following referral to the County Counsel and Public Works Director, the Director of Public Works submitted a written report and recommendation to award the contract to John Schaaf, Individual Owner of J. Schaaf Painting and Waterproofing Company, 3719 Manderina Court, Santa Barbara, California, the l ow bidder . It appearing that the bid of John Schaaf is the lowest and best bid received from a responsible bidder, and that said bid is satisfactory and in accordance with the notice inviting bids for said project; Report from IVCC re Time Limit for Close l . V. Street to Motor Vehicle Traffic. I Permission to Occu County Detention Facility Prior to Completion of Cont / 201 October 26, 1970 Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried, with Supervisor Callahan abstaining, it is ordered that the base bid without Alternate No . 1 of John Schaaf, Individual Owner of J . Schaaf Painting and Waterproofing Company, in the amount of $11,400.00 be accepted, and that the contract for said project be awarded to the said contractor from Account 36 B 10 at the price and upon the terms and conditions set forth in said bid and in said notice inviting bids . It is further ordered that the Director of Public Works be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to prepare the necessary contract for the work; and the ' Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute said contract . In the Matter of Report from Isla Vista Community Council Relative to Time xperiment to Limit for Experiment to Close Certain Isla Vista Streets to Motor Vehicle Traffic . Andrew Simpson, representing the Isla Vista Community Council, requested a continuance for one week. They performed a study on the barriers, and the results of the study will be presented to the Council this evening when they will make a decision on whether or not the barriers should be removed or maintained until a general study on street circulation in Isla Vista can be conducted. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, continued to Monday, November 2, 1970, as requested by the Isla Vista Community Counci l. In the Matter of Santa Barbara County Public Safety Authority' s Approval of Request of Board of Supervisors for Permission to Occupy County Detention ct. Facility Prior to Completion of Contract. The Santa Barbara County Public Safety Authority submitted a written authorization, following its Special Meeting of October 19, 1970, to grant a license to the County of Santa Barbara to use and occupy the public safety detention facilities for the purpose contemplated by the lease, even though the connnunications contract for such building has not as yet been completed . There should be no problem regarding liability insurance since the Authority is named as a co-insured under the County ' s Liability Policy, or regarding the insurance coverage which the Authority must keep in force and effect under the terms of the Authority's bond Resolution No . 4. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Sheriff be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to proceed with the moving of prisoners into the new jail facility . Execution of 2nd In the Matter of Execution of Second Amendment to November 28, 1960 Agree- Amendment to Nov. 28, 1960 Afreement ment for Expansion of Goleta Sanitary District Sewage Disposal Treatment Plant for Expans on of Goleta Sanitary Dis Facilities between the County of Santa Barbara, Goleta Sanitary District, Isla Vista Sewage Disposal Treatment Plant Sanitary District, The Regents of the University of California, and the City of Facilities. / Santa Barbara. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the following resol ution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO. 70- 659 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILES) 202 Notice by Jacob Seldow of Violation by Co. of Pu chase Agre and Demand t Conxnence Demain Proce County Dispo Site at Tajiguas. I z Linda, October 26, 1970 In the Matter of Notice by Jacob Seldowitz, General Partner, Rancho Costa of Violation by County of Purchase Agreement and Demand to Commence Eminent t Domain Proceedings, County Disposal Site at Tajiguas . nt The County Counsel summarized subject matter, stating his office has been inga, l in negotiations for about a year to work this out, and they are asking that the County commence eminent domain proceedings . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to County Counsel . Urgency Ordi1'Dnce In the Matter of Urgency Ordinance No . 2127 - Granting Franchise to Standard 2127-Grantin Franchise to Standard Gas Co. to lnsta Pipeline to Transport Wa Water-S.M. a I Gas Company to Install, Maintain and Operate 8-Inch Pipeline to Transport Waste Water 1 obtained through Oil Production from Gathering Site to Treatment Plant, Santa Maria teArea . ea. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, the Board passed and adopted urgency Ordinance No . 2127 entitled ''An Ordinance Granting a Franchise to Standard Gas Company", to install, maintain and operate an 8- inch pipeline to transport waste water obtained through oil production from gathering site to treatment plant in the Santa Maria area, for a 40-year period, with annual payment to the County at the rate of one cent per inch of nominal internal diameter per foot of pipeline installed and maintained in roads, and the rate of $25 per mile of pole line or conduit for pole lines of conduits incidentally installed or maintained. Upon the roll being called, the following Supervisors voted Aye, to-wit: George H. Clyde, Joe J . Callahan, Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell . NOES : None . ABSENT : None. Netice of In the Matter of Filing of Notice of Completion by Road Commissioner for Completion for Constr. f Construction of Improvements on Hollister Avenue and Other Streets in the Town of Improvements in Geleta. Goleta and Storm Drain System from Gato Avenue to San Pedro Creek. I Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and car- Approval of Request of Gertrude E. Reyes fer 1- yr. Extensio to Complete Processing o Agric. Frese in Cuyama. I e ried unanimously, it is ordered that the Road Commissioner be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to file a Notice of Completion for "Construction of Improvements on Hollister Avenue and Other Streets in the Town of Goleta and Storm Drain System from Gato Avenue to San Pedro Creek"; and the Clerk be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to record said document in the office of the Santa Barbara County Recorder. In the Matter of Approval of Request of Gertrude E. Reyes for One-Year Ex- ' tension to Complete Processing of Agricultural Preserve in Cuyama, Fifth Supervisorial District (69-AP- 12) (69- RZ- 21) . I Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject request for a one-year time extension to complete processing of the application for an Agricultural Preserve in Cuyama, Fifth Supervisorial District (69-AP-12) (69-RZ-21) be, and the same is hereby approved, conditi oned on her subsequent execution of the new ''contract'' form which has since re- , 203 October 26, 1970 pl aced the old Land Conservation ''agreeme11t'' form executed by her ; and is subject to appr oval by the Board as t he Board has the r ight to t e rminat e an a gr icul tural preserve at any tl.I lle . Protest of In t he Matter of Protest of Dar rell Smith to Proposed Freeway over Harris Darrell Smith to Proposed Freeway o erGrade North of Lompoc . Harris Grade North of Lompa:. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and ' Connnunication&'. carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the Road Commissioner on fil e : In t he Matter of Communications . The following communications were received by the Board and ordered placed / Placer County Board of Supervisors - resolution urging defeat of Proposition 18 (diversion of gas tax funds) at November 3, 1970 election. 1Ventura County & Lassen County Boards of Supervisors - resolutions requesting review of assessing practices of State Board of Equilization re State assessed property . Notice ef New In the Matter of Notice from CSAC of New Crisis in Welfare Administration Crisis in Welfare Administration With 115% Limitation. with 1151 Limitati n. / Appointment of Members to Rules ~egulatiens Connnit . ' of S B Co Air Pollution Contrel Dist. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and t he same is hereby, referred to the Administrative Officer, County Counsel, and Welfare Director for study, and report back to the Board. In the Matter of Appointment of Members to Rules & Regulations Conunittee eeof Sant a Barbara County Air Pollution Control District . The Adminis t rative Officer submitted a list of nominees to the District 1 Committee for confirmation . It was indicated that the City of Santa Maria has not as yet submitted its nominee . Chairman Clyde felt that there are representatives on the list that cause pollution bt not representatives of people who are concerned more than anyone else . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell , seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the following persons be, and they are hereby , appoi nted t o the Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District Conunittee on Rules and Regulations: S. B. Co . Administrative Office - Raymond D. Johnson, Administrative Officer S. B. Co . Fire Department - Herbert Gordon, Fire Prevention Officer County Farm Bureau - S. B. Co . Health Department - City of Santa Barbara - Frank Giorgi Alfred Engle, Director of Environmental Health Councilman Alan Eschenroeder Alternate : Delmer May, Fire Chief 204 Salary R.ecommendati I Officer. October 26, 1970 City of Carpinteria - City of Lompoc - City of Guadalupe - S . B. Co . Taxpayers Ass ' n - Councilman Ernest C. Wullbrandt F. K. Dawson, Public Works Director Mayor Charles E. Draper R. L. Temple, Executive Secretary S. B. Co . Public Works Dept . - Vernon Bugh, Deputy Director S. B. Co . Agricultural Conun. ~ Walter E. Curmnings, Agricultural Commissioner S. B. Co . Farm & Home Advisor - Lin V. Maxwell, Farm & Home Advisor County Medical Society - League of Women Voters - Tuberculosis & Health Ass 'n - S. B. Co . Petroleum Dept. - S.B. Range Improvement Ass 'n - Representative of : Carpinteria-Surmnerland Fire District; Mission Canon Fire District; Montecito Fire Protection District: Dr . Wayland A. Stephenson, M. D. Mrs . George P . Kerns Dr . Donal F . Sweeney, M.D. E. D. Lawrence , Petroleum Engineer William F. Luton, Homer Larsen, Alternate Herber O. Wilson, Fire Marshal In the Matter of Salary Recommendations as Presented by Administrative The Administrative Officer read his report dated October 26, 1970 on subject matter, which indicated that administration would continue to meet and confer with employee representatives in an attempt to resolve differences . Many meetings have been held during this pas t week and, as a result of these discussions, a number of resoluti ons have been accomplished which are bei ng submitt ed to the Board for consideration as amendments to the original recommendations submitted. These changes are : Classification Financial Resources Supervisor Eligibility Supervisor II Eligibility Supervisor I Eligibility Worker Eligibility Worker Trainee Director of Environmental Health Senior Pharmacist Pharmacist Laboratory Aide Housekeeping Services Sup.-SB Housekeeping Services Sup . - SM Assistant District Attorney Chief Deputy District Attorney Housekeeper Garage Supervisor Fire Control Officer Fire Prevention Officer Fire Battalion Chief Fire Captain Senior Superior Court Clerk Assistant Auditor-Controller Justice Court Clerk From To 71 72 72 73 58 59 52 53 48 49 81 82 81 Flat $1,366 79 Flat $1,301 34 37 61 60 56 55 94 96 97 96 49 48 69* 67 83 84 83 84 77 82* 73 78* 61 63 84 86 Change error in figures to 51 $540- 657 * 3- Step Range - October 26 , 1970 It is estimated that this list of changes will produce an additional cost of approximatel y $21 ,000, incl uding direct payroll overhead such as retirement, OASDI, and Workmen' s Compensation insurance . There still remains some areas in whi ch he does not feel justified in making changes as suggested and, as a result, have not altered his position. It is fel t that the recommendations as currently stated do place the County in a competitive position, and that all areas have been examined with care and caution . ' The Administrative Officer informed the Board that in his opinion representatives have genuinely represented their groups in a most professional way and the discussions have been constructive . Mr . Johnson submitted a Memorandum of Understanding between himself and the General Manager of th~ S. B. County Employees Association, dated October 26, 1970, which was ordered placed on file . This contains the agreed upon results of the '~eet and confer" process between representatives of the Association and County representatives concerning salary reconnnendations submitted to the Board for consideration. 205 Provisions set forth in the Administrative Officer ' s salary reconnnendations for December 1, 1970, as amended by letter to the Board regarding amended recommendations dated October 26, 1970, except as noted on the attached copies, are agreed upon by the representatives of the County and the Association as jointlyapproved recommendations to the Board . Provisions set forth in the Administrative Officer' s letter of transmittal dated October 19, 1970, regarding the reduction in duty schedule for shift personnel of the Fire Service to a 72- hour duty schedule effective December 1, 1970, and to an approximate 67- hour schedul e as of July 1, 1971, with attendant modifications in the manner in which vacation time is applied to the duty schedule are hereby made a part of this Memorandum. Zack L. Stringer , General Manager of the Employees Association, said there is agreement on 75% of the work force but they have reached an impasse on 25% of the work force . Perhaps the Association should consider mediation . The striking employees were granted pay increases and benefits which c annot be related to set standards for other employee sal aries . The Bailiff class was l eft out when t he Sheri ff ' s people were considered . A review of information related to the clerical and groundsman seri es shows that the data used to be 16 to 18 months old J anuary 1 , 1971, he said . Local data to favor one group was excluded, and local information was included to the detriment of the clerical and groundsman group . There are doubl e standards used in other areas . The Association has one althernative - toask for third party intervention - for mediation. The areas of agreement relate to the policy of January 6, 1969, which was the 8- county sample and use of local data, as appropriate. The Administrative Officer responded that when administration developed the recommendations for the Sheriff's classifications, the interpretation of the data that was used developed an indication of a 10% increase for the deputy, and it was on the basis of the data that supported the 1 2~% for the higher ranks, and the fact that the local pol ice department salary for patrolman was higher and did 206 October 26, 1970 support these two factors and internal relationships for all classifications. Colonel Richard Temple (Ret'd) of the S. B. County Taxpayers Associ ation read from a prepared statement which indicated grave concern the trend in compensation for public employees in all public entities. The increasing unemployment in the private sector of the County's ecomony was pointed out, and consequently those unemployed individuals' abi lity to pay property taxes . Now is the time for elected and appointed officials to reduce manning and expenditures of public funds, even though such decisions will not be welcome by some . The GH report of January, 1967 recommended annual salary survey, a merit system, and salary adjustments . In general, a local salary survey was to apply to certain positions and an 8- county composite average to certain other pos itions . This composite county average has no relationship to the local costs of living and salary acceptability of persons seeking employment . It is understood that the county has no current comprehensive local salary survey for comparative purposes . With regard to a report that perhaps 30 to 40 unfilled positions may not be filled so funds can cover unbudgeted expenses, perhaps these pos itions were not really a priority need . The budget hearings made no mention of the County borrowing $3,500,000 until the end of December, 1970, nor did the budget contain any provision for interest on such a borrowing . He questioned the credibility of a county expenditures budget from the taxpayers viewpoint. The recent salary adjustment awarded certain Sheriff's Department personnel makes public protection more expensive to all county taxpayers. It was again recommended the urgent action leading to reducing the partol staffing f rom 1 per 1,200 population in the unincorporated area to 1 per 2,400 population, excluding from population calculations the population l iving on Vandenberg Air Force Base and on the UCSB campus. Mental health costs are rising at an alarming rate . The county may be paying in excess of 10% of the cost of the program, and may increase even more. The blanket authorization of the Board to hire personnel in certain categories at a salary above col11mn ''A'' should be withdrawn, and any positing hiring above that brought to the Board for approval to increase control over salary costs . It should be recognized that there are certain benefits unique to public employment, such as job security and stability, accumulative sick leave benefits, vacations and recognized holidays as well as retirement provisions . It was pointed out that the decisions made on the present proposals will have considerable affect on the next round of salary discussions . In s11mmary, the follov1ing recommendations were made: 1) Annual evaluation be based on prevailing compensation in similar jobs and classifications . Compensation includes all fringe benefits, special pay , housing, meals, uniform allow~nces . Use of salaries rather than compensation may create disparities. 2) A Current comprehensive local salary survey be made and used as a basis for current adjustments. 3) Discontinue the use of the composite county average . 4) Compensation surveys become the responsibility of the Civil Se rvi ce Co mm issi on a ft er passage o f measure ''B'' The compensation recommendations of the Commission to be of a ''recommending'' nature only, for Board consideration. 9Btx October 26 , 1970 5) Review the salary changes proposed for appointed department heads and assistant department heads. 6) Suspend any action on s alary changes for mental health - pending r esol ution of the mental health service budget, means of f i nancing , and bringi ng t he county portion to 10%. 7) Reduce travel and transportation expenses , particular l y out-of - county conference travel . 8) Re- examine supply inventory l evel s . A communication was read f r om the s. B. County Government Attorney ' s Association regarding positions in the District Attorney ' s office . The proposed continuation of the existing discriminatory treatment i n the Attorney Assistant's positions was found to be unacceptabl e . There is nothing i n the organi zational structures or scope and r ange of s upervisory r es pons ibil ities between t he various departments which sugge s t s the appropriateness of r ais i ng the County Counsel 's Assistants ' position to Range 96 , whil e similar l y titl ed position- hol ders in ot her county at t orney departments are rel egated to Range 94 . Secondl y, the proposed sal ary adjustment for the Assistant r ange is inadequate . Assuming the Board were 207 I I to accept their r ecommendation that all assistant department heads be treated equally and a~o p t Range 96 , the proposed s alary adjustments woul d, neverthel ess, leave I Sant a Barbar a be l ow the average of the eight- count y survey . The v ery amount of the disc r epancies in the Ass istants' pay r ange reveals the l ong- standing neglect in this pers onnel c ategory . The r e does not appear to be any jus tif ication for the f ai l ure I to gr ant a percentage incr ease adequate to produce conformity with the eight- count y average, except the disproportionat e size of the adjustment needed to compensat e for the lengthy negl ect of this c ategory. The Association f avors the proposal of the District Attorney ' s alternate method of adjustment insofar as it calls for equal treatment of departmental assistant s and exposes the Personne l Department ' s proposed adjustments for that position as well bel ow the ei ght- county average . The Association, however, takes exception with that por tion which proposes that the position of Chief Deputy in the Distri ct Attorney ' s office be el iminated . The question is one of equality of treatment for similar ly titl ed position- hol ders and s alary adj us tments for that c ategory in conformity with the eight-county survey average, not the e l imination of other positions . The Association not onl y feel s that the proposal is inconsistent with the organizational needs of the District Attorney's office , but sees no r eason why any County department should have t o barter away othe~ titled positions to ob- I tain t he adequat e s al ari es atld equal ity of t r eatment wl1ich i s o the~is e i ndependent J.y j us tif i ed by the Couo.t y ' s own ''be11cl1mar ks ' ' and depa r tme11t aJ. needs . The e l imina t i on of t he Chief Deput y position wil l res ul t i n even fur t her i nequit i es . Only adj ustment t o Range 100-101, not 97, 't'lill p1:-oduce pa r ity 't'li th t he eight cour t y ave rage . Eli mi nation of t hat category 't'1oul d undoubt edly r es ult i n s ome i ndi vidual per for ming t he s ame orgai nzational f unctions aILd exer c i s i ng t he same s upervisory r es ponsi bi l ities at a reduced s ala ry range . The Associ at i on sees t he equal t r eatment of all department al ass i stants , coupl ed with app ~opriate s ala~y adj ustments commensura t e wit h t he eight- count y aver age, as a mor e equitable step ~ 208 Octobe~ 26, 1970 toward co recting the existing discrimination between similarly situated departmental attoney assistants . /r.t Clemens of the Tax Action Commission made a presentatioi., statirg t his is going t o bring about edditioual increase in taxes, with an increased bu:den being placed on real estate taxpayers who are paying may times their share of t~e tax load. Also, there are people gut of work now and the unemployment ratio is going up . He also pointed out that there are $25 million that is tax exempt in t he county . Robert L. Hunt, Executive Secretary of the Santa Berbara County Farm Bureau, ~ ead from a prepared statement, i ndicating deep concern at t he rapidly i ncreas ing costs of County government and high tax rate . The present salary negotiations can result in i ncreased costs beyond the ability of the taxpayers t o pay . Salaries of Cou1ty employees should not exceed t hose paid for comparable work in the private sector of t he economy . These empJoyees must remember that their job secur ity with the County has definite economic value . The Farm Bureau urged t he Board t o immediately i r itiate reductions and consolidation of staff in aJl CouI'ty departments t o hold t he budget t o no higher than its present level . This can be accompl ished by not filling vacant positions or replacing retiring employees . He reiterated the recommendation that t he ratio of patrol deputy sheriffs t o rural population be set a t one to 2,000 and that suburban communities form police districts if they desire city-type police protection. He sai d the County is in no position t o maintain e standing ermy. There is an area west of the City almost as large as the City ~f Santa Barbara that is using almos t city-type protection. Solvang people would like a merchant's patrol with deputies . He fee l s tha t some formula for overtime for these men could be worked out as compensation for t his, and a. s heriff's auxiliary would be a practicel mea . s of handli ng a certain number of emergency situa tions , and this should be explored . Chairman Clyde said that no more deputies had been added as e result of any disorders , and Mr . Hunt replied that the County has got to have better quality of training and performance from the staff . He said they have asked for the County t o t ake i n the possibility of having a survey made by an efficiency firm that would recommend efficiencies thet would be considered favorable by the Board. He requested the Board to seriously cons ider such an action . Supervisor Grant s aid this Boarddd budget for salary adjustments t o t ake place J aruary 1, not December 1 so the EOard is considering today the same proposals or r ecommendations that wouJd have been heerd later on. The Admi nistrative Officer said that if the recommendetions are adopted , he will offer a proposal for placing limitations for filling positions which will effect a s alery s aving t o finance the adjustments . Supervisor Callahan asked about services and supplies, and Mr. Johnson replied that they have no plans as this was all s creened during the budget hearings . Zack Stringer, General Menager of thE7 Employees Associ ation, reiterated thet ther.e is agreement on 75% of the positions and adjustments, but h~ve reached an impasse on the other 25%, and suggested third party mediation. Supervisor Grant then asked if it would be advisable to hold this open and discuss further this week, and Chairman Cl yde replied that the recotmilendati ons were submitted last week and the Board can' t get into debating each category . Ordinance 2128 I Declarin& a Morato on Fillinc All Pre and Future Vacant Pesitions fer Balance of FY 1970-71 I 209 October 26 , 1970 Mr . Hunt stressed t heir concern t hat the l ower classes have more substantial increases . The Administretive Officer said that setting s alaries is a very difficul t process but by f ollowing a method the attempt is made to provide a reasonabl e sol ution to a very difficul t probl em. The average incr ease f or all is s l ightl y over 8% of the total s al ary budget . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell , seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carr ied, with Supervisor Callahan voting "No", it is ordered that the recommendations for s a l ary adjustments to become effective December 1 , 1970, as amended be, and t he s ame are hereby, confirmed, and that the s alary of the Administrative Officer be I increased 5%. It is further ordered that the f ollowi ng ordinance be , and the same is hereby, passed and adopted: In t he Matter of Ordinance No. 2128 - The Salary Ordinance of the County of Sant a Barbara , and Repeeling Ordinance No . 2041 and Others i n Conf l ict Herewith. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell , seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carr ied, Ordinance No. 2128 of the County of Santa Barbar a , entitl ed "The Selary Ordinance of the County of Sant a Bar bar a Providing for the Number and Compensation of Certai n Officers, Deputies, Assistants, Cl erks and Empl oyees of the County of Sant a Barbs r a and Judicial Distr icts thereof, Except the Supervisor s, t he Distr ict Attorney, the Superior Court Judges, the Auditor, the Superi ntendent of Schools, the Jurors, and Cer tain Others: Fixing the Duties of Certain Officers and Employees, Dir ecting the Disposition of Certain Fees: and Repeal ing Ordinance No. 2041 and any and All Ordinances and Parts of Ordinances in Conf l ict Herewith" was passed and adopted. Upon the r ol l being c all ed, the following Supervisor s voted Aye, to-wit: George H. Cl yde, Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie and Curtis Tunnell . NOES: Joe J . Ca l lahan ABSENf: None . iua In the Matter of Declaring a Morator ium on Fil ling All Present and Future ent Vacant Posi tions for Balance of 1970-71 FY and Directing Administrative Officer to Review Same and Not Fill Vac ant Positions Subject to Board Approval . During the discussion on salaries and personne l , Supe rvisor Tunnell pointed out t he need to pursue the question of present unfilled positions, and f avored the declar ation of a moratorium immediatel y on filling all present v acant positions requiring s pecial approval . Every effort shoul d be made to e l iminate unnecessary positions and to br ing about greater efficiency and the ope ration of some departments with fewer employees if and wher e possibl e . R. D. Johnson , Administrative Officer, suggested tha t the Board consider imposing l imitations on the filli ng of present and future vacant positions for the balance of this fiscal year, and place the control under administr?tion that a vacant position can onJ y be fil led by recommendations approved by the Boa r d . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Be attie, and carried unanimousl y, it is order ed that a moratorium on filli ng aJJ present and future vacant County positions for the balance of FY 1970-71 , be, and t he s ame is her eby , declared, effective this date . 21.0 ""alary Survey to compare Sa Job LeYels in S.B. County with those in Private Indus effect. - Jan l, 1971. I Ordinance 212 I Allowance of Claims. I October 26 , J 970 It is further or dered that the Pdministrative Officer be, and he is hereby, author i zed and directed to r eview all present and future unfi lled County positions end not fill those which, i n his discretion , shoul d not be filled, subject to approval of the Board of Supe rviso rs , for the balance of FY.1970- 71, effective this ds te. In the Matter of Dir ecting Director of Personne l to Make SaJary Survey of aries of Job Leve ~s in Sant a Barbara County for Comparison of SaJaries in Effect January 1 , 1971 ry in with. Job Level s in Private Industry . Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supe rvisor Grant, end carr ied unanimously, it is ordered that the Dir ector of Personnel be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to proceed with a s alary survey of j ob l evel s bel ow executive l evel s in Sant a Barbar a County for comparison of s alaries in effect J anuary 1 , 1971 with j ob l evel s i n private industr y, and r eport back by the first of February, 1971 In the Matter of Ordinance No . 2129 - An Ordinance of Laguna County Sanitation District Establ ishing Number and Compensation of Empl oyees and Repe aJ ing Ordinance No . 2045 . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunne l l, seco.n ded by Supe. rvisor Grant, and c ar - ried unanimously, the Board passed and adopted. Ordinanc. e . No 2129 of the County of Sant a Barbar a , entitl ed "An Ordinance of the Laguna County Sanitation District Es- t abl ishing Terms and Conditions of Empl oyment of Officers and Employees, and Providing for the Number and Compensation of Such Officer s and Empl oyees: and Repealing Ordinance No. 2045 . '' Upo~ the roll being called, the fo l lowing Supervisor s voted Aye, to-wit: George H. Cl yde, Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, and Cur tis Tunnell . NOES: Joe J . Callahan ABSENI': None. The Board recessed until 2 o'cl ock, p .m. I , At 2 o'cl ock, p .m., the Bo~ rd r econyened. Pr esent: Super;visors Geo rge H. Cl yde , Jpe J . Ca~l a han, c nani el ' G. Grant, Francis H, Beattie, and Curtis Tuppell ; . and J. E. ;Lel'1is, Cl erk Supervisor Cl yde in the Chair ' In t he Matter of Allowance of Claims. t Upon motion, dul y seconded, and c ~ rried unanimous l y, it is ordered that the following c laims be, and the s ame are her eby a l. lowed, each c l aim fo. r the amount and payabl e o~t . of the fund designated on the f ace of each. c la ~m, respectivel y, to-wit: (SEE CLAIMS LIST PAGE 211) ! I e I 5 . . Upon the roll being called, the fo l lowing Supervisors voted Aye, to-wit: ~ George H. Clyde, Joe J. Cal lahan , D.a niel G. Grant, Francis H. Be attie , and Cur tis Tunnell . l NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 211 Octobe' 21'; 1970 --~-~ ' I . --- - 107U. 10711 ma m 1'A 117'1 11787 1., 10711 10710 11711 11712 J.t7U 11714 11711 18716 11717 UYU 11711 11710 ltnl lOJU 19711 10?M 10711 IOJM mn 1071 117 10711 18"1 117Q l07M 107U 11737 AC I !57 . ' '' AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER t I \ PAYEE llllda llllde C''~ . , . a- . . - e.nnt~ . s. C--i.l.o1t1n1l 11. . lMlKOf._ ~ 1111.e , . ~ . ~ .a .,. .wllt . ~d . --llSM ft.me - . ~ -~ . o,._.oe SANT A BARBARA COUNTY '--------.&.DATE.---. PURPOSE SYMBOL . 1 au . . la IO l 1' , . . llaU _. 11a11 . aOllp'- uan iaau ~ 11 911U. e1allil Ati uau naae . 'Ir.- nau ld1 l'ltw _. llaM - 1170 WARRANT ALLOWED FOR u.ts .'' ID.II 1 ,. Sl.tO JA. . 15.0I 1.00 710.00 ,., . ll0.00 ' 111.11 11.00 ~ . u .ts oo u . 101.00 a.so tt.O f'" l.M . 110 lll.00 . u.oo . . ,. 1.u , REMARKS -- . AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANT A BARBARA COUNTY l ' FUND_ _ ____ DATE --- J.t7e _,_, NUMBER PAYEE PURPOSE SYMBOL WARRANT ALLOWED FOR REMARKS 1.,. . '. . e.-.i "''' I.It 11140 1., mu ., . . nan , . .,. . I c . . ft Ula a.di - fill , 7 ,., Wlt1 IM6ft ., . _ . .,., 11741 fttl lllli ,., ----~ ,_ . (9-ftll 1,1.7,4.? 1.1 1. . ' .111 . tldM . ., . w . 117 n. lnll . UYJt . ~ . . . uru . ., a I , . 117M .i ti a I w 11711 ,L Olaf ,. 211.u . Ullit.U ~.,. ,U.Y,Q. . . . U.00 m . ., lft ,U. ,lO.,'J.l.l .al . e-lll . ,. WD. - ., . au .,_,,., ~--i . . . . .u. _ -,. .,. . ~ . ._. . ltM7 ,. 1M.M i. 11--- ,._ au DJ.17 l07lt 811 u.1s 1. 9U1lala 19 18'71 ,11le an 111.11 UJn ~~ ,., ., . , 111. u''' Ill 8 I ia.n Ill a II AC1 !S7 ,. ~\ ' \ AUDITOR'S WARRANT :REGISTER '\ SANTA BARBARA COUNTY FUND._ - -----'--_DATE ._ Ila l171 NUMBER PAYEE , . 111177 11171 117B 1., I.nu ll7M a m.1at1IG.Ue~-- ~ wu.u. . , lllilllitl a-. .' . -.-i . .1 ,. -.~ nl - PURPOSE . . ~ .u- --- r-i---~ . -iu. __. . ,.,., inta ._. r. -.ii. 11711 ~--u - . .u. ,., .-- _ , UHi . .,_ .U,N.7. . - ""1Ulia _. SYMBOL an au 111 a II Ill 1J lb Sii a It II an lMaM Ja UlD U7a1t Ill a I 111. u WARRANT ALLOWED FOR . 1.se -, . 11.w 2 1' 1.,. ., , . II.JI u . 11 . . 11.-11 . is.11 lf .M 1i.oo u. . , I REMARKS UY .,,. . - J.lt u 211.0I . . . \ . ' a.ti z .-au.1 . ue. ,. ,. v Ml . 9lllllMiW - . 1 , . . ~# U.M - . ~- i-. -.i_ u u.r .-iu.L ,.,. llillt *JU.la&. . "*' lllt u.oo llUt . MUaa - . MIU. ~ - - u . AC 1117 AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER , ., SANT A BARBARA COUNTY ' ' FUND- -"' DATE --lfa 117f NUMBER PAYEE PURPOSE SYMBOL WARRANT ALLOWED FOR REMARKS 11111 .,. , - euta~ . ,_ . hi.II une ~ - uat . - . . n.n mu , . Ulll - . . . u . ,. . ~ . u.u Ula ~- ?l.IO . 1MY . m.11 5 ,. . 671 -- .a.n . c . ~.-. - . a. . - J.I.O ---~~ . UOU ~u .ai ,a . J.11 a I 111 a D lY . .MU.,.I - , . lJOI llQ7 lLOO lldWlaL . J. Ill a H 1.111.11 _ CS.lit Ill a J ~h . " ~. . au l au n.tt m 11 . ~ . IU a JA 17.IO . uraa1 . lUU . -.i . a . - IS. UM7 J, . . . . AC I 157 NUMBER . UU1 1 HUI llint HIM Hiil 1911 l . UllS ~ i.17 ~ 1ll7t 11*11 11171 JA97J UIJ 1'171 HIN 11177 ,. ~ 1191 ., ~- ,_ AC I !57 , ' , AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ' FUND .__ ____ -JDATE -- JIJt PAYEE PURPOSE llllllld1ilr - ~ . o . *lWilL ._ . e. , . . ---- lflMll ~i Ydi.r lllM-1 . . w.~ . lill9i. . 9&Mla . - ~ ~ . i- e11-- . . =, .,.~ . ._~ . _eu.t.i.-_U. ___ . . 1 . -. _.~ .u ~-- -:. --- . . . SYMBOL lHaU UI a 16 &II a 18 - 111. u 1118111 111 a au WARRANT ALLOWED FOR M.11 11.to . u.11 . . . " u s.a lfl 111.11 . , ''' m"'. .a. -;. Ha. u . . ''" a. , REMARKS ."'. \- "- . NUMBER u.7 . 1- 1ltM i.tl 1Mtl ,. . a.es i- J.tan ~ ~ UNI 1ttM 1811 11107 , lot lltll UtU n - Ullt Ulla 181 !Mn AC I !57 . . '' AUDITOR'S iWARRANT REGISTER 1 FUND ' . \ SANTA BARBARA COUNTY -----~DATE PAYEE PURPOSE SYMBOL . - . ~ . mau . ' ' ,. lf . . . uoau .-._.1 . . .ui ~- . 9&1Ula . . wuu. ~ . ~- -.11 . ~ .,i -- . ia a n 111 a JMll . . .,., .-.u. . ----lit ~ &74 u !-" JUIO . 111an .,.,. . ~--- . a , ,f. . . - Ual . s lM a . WARRANT ALLOWED FOR s.n . . 1.921.0I ' 11 . 1.111. . . , . 111 2.1 l,116.YI ,., . US.65 111.11 . 1 . , ,. '." '.' , . us . c.nt. . , n.s . r , REMARKS . . . . ' , L 4 'l I ' . . ~- . (' -AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER I NUMBER PAYEE ' ' . lllU - ' . . AC 1 !57 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PURPOSE -.-.-.-.- SYMBOL 1tf.' .U.t W81 u. a I ,, I a .I a I J , 11 11 as 1t a 1 It , .,. J , * , Wal .bl a I Wf llt , 11111 ._ w :ta .M '4 . UaH uaic J.7 a M atU WARRANT ALLOWED FOR mt- a.- 1. .'. . . (a,417.7-4) . 11.10 u.u ., . . . . HS.II . 11. u . 111.11 . . . . . . 41.11 c1.u1 , M.U u . . . . . 11. -~ REMARKS I NUMBER PAYEE .- , r t - - AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER ~ SANTA BARBARA COUNTY FUND --. ATE ' PURPOSE SYMBOL uaw . , JA JA , JA lM JA 111 aM UTaM Ill 14 Illa M lMaJA Ill M lit 14 110. JA UlaU l8l. JA WARRANT ALLOWED FOR ci.111.na I.JI a. , . '' l uu n.u .,. .H 111.71 ut.ie . u u.- . ' ' REMARKS ) NUMBER l~ 11911 J.OQI 1 10H7 HI 1 J.OIH AC-1157 I Jt. ? 114 . AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER / PAYEE ,. u e .,_ , SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ______ _DATE - 1170 PURPOSE . . . ~, .~. fite.Ga+. ~T: ' ' SYMBOL , s 141., 1." ltO a Ila WARRANT ALLOWED FOR Ml.15 I s.11 n.u U.M 11,llJ.lt t.u1.u REMARKS . . NUMBER .a.,.s " - . " ' ' ' I ' PAYEE -- T } , _,__ ( I \ AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANTA BARBARA COUNTY FUND _ __;:_;;._ ---'------ -LDATE,__;---'---H---'-.,-1_,_'10 - 1 ' : ' . . 1 . - . I PURPOSE SYMBOL WARRANT ALLOWED FOR . . . . u u . . . 17 . t , . . . ~ Jll.14 -~ ' REMARKS . . ' . . . . - - . . . . a.a ltOh . . . . t ,. . - I ' - ' " J 0 AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SAN11A BARBARA COUNTY ~ FUND M!tlDIL---:.- - --_.DATE_ PAYEE 'PURPOSE SYMBGL . WARRANT NUMBER ALLOWED FOR REMARKS ' . ,. . ~ MAJ.0 "" . , . ~h. ,. , . -.u a1D ' - U.IT ,. . ,. . u.n ' .tYM - .v UM ' ACl!57 --- - --- - NUMBER I \ I AC-1157 ' . ~ ~ ' . 1 1 r.~,; AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER . ., " ' ' PAYEE I I j ' ' ' . . . l , ; ' . , ,. ,. I .t f ; . . } " I ~ . I lb MDI PURPOSE SYMBOL I WARRANT ALLOWED FOR w , . lS. 1-ll 191.M w . . . " REMARKS ---------------,.-----------,------------ ------ --------------------.----------,:--------. 212 Requests f'Or Apprepriatio , October 26 , 1970 In the Ma t~ er of Requests for Appropriation, Cancellation or Revision. o~ Cancellation, Funds . or Revision _,_.- Funds. ' ; Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell' , and ca r - r ied unanimous ly , the fo l lowing requests for appropriation, cancel l ation or r evision of funds are hereby approved, i n the budget classifications and amounts shown, and the Auditor be, and he is hereby, author ized and directed to make the necessary t ransfers : Department of Health - Transfer from 150Bll, Medical, Dental & Lab Suppl ies, $220 . 00 to 150Cl , Laboratory Equipment , General Fund . Department of Los Prietos -Boys' Camp - Transfer from 101-B- 10, $539 . 00, to 101-C-2, General Fund Heatings en In the Matter of Hearings on Plann i ng Commission and Agricultural Preserve the rezoning ef Propertie Advisory Connnittee Reconnnendations for Approval of Request to Adopt Ordimnce Amendi ng in Los Alamo Area, and Articl e .IV of Ordinance No . 661 to Rezone Properties in Los Alamos Area; and Creation Creatien ef Agric. Prese es ~f Agricul tural Preserves . / This being the date and time set for the continued hearings on subject Hearing on Appeal ef Raymond E. Spencer on behalf ef P Andersen fer Denial of R.e quest fer Cenditienal Exceptien an Side Yard Adjustment a 1185 Anderse Lane, Gel&ta. I Hearin& en Appeal ef Ernest Haeck.'111.L f rem Denial ef ltequests t rezene Preperty (Ranch San Jose) and Conditional Exceptien j matter; Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervi sor Beattie, and carr i ed unani mously , i t i s ordered that subject hearings be, and the same are hereby, duly and r egularly continued to Monday, November 30, 1970, at 2 o'cl ock, p .m. In the Matter of Hearing on Appeal of Raymond E. Spencer on Behalf of P. A. Andersen from Planni ng Connnission Denial of Request for Conditional Exception and Side Yard Adjustment on Prope rty at 1185 Anderson Lane , Go l eta (70-V-44) . , This being the date and time set for heari ng on subject proposal ; Upon motion of Supervisor Grant , seconded by Supervisor Ca l l ahan, and carried unanimousl y, it is order ed that subject heari ng be, and the s ame is hereby, duly and r egularly continued to Monday, November 9, 1970, a t 2 o'cl ock, p .m. , at the request of Attorney J ames R. Christiansen, attorney for the appellant . In the Matter of Heari ng on Appeal of Ernest Haeckel from Planning Commission Denial of Requests for Ordinance Amending Articl e IV of Ordinance No . 661 to Rezone Property (Rancho San Jose) , Go l eta from ''U'' to WA-T District for T.ra i l er Park (70-RZ-3) ; and Conditional Exception Permitting 10 Instead of 20 Sites . This bei ng the date and time set for hearing on subject proposal ; the Affi davit of Publication being on file with the Cl erk; Dr. Henry L. Hol derman, M. D. transmitted a l etter to the Board to the effect that Ernest Haeckel has had a mil d stroke and a delay i n any hearing procedures woul d be advisable for his health, which was r ead by the Cl e r k . The Planni ng Commission submitted a. Zoni ng Report , dated October 21, 1970, which was read by the Cl erk. The action of the Planni ng Connnission, by a vote of 6 to 0 with one abstention (on t he basis of absence from a FOr tion of the prior hearing) , was to deny the request for the Conditional Exception and for rezoning on the basis that: I October 26 , 1970 1) Topography of the proper ty does not lend itself to a trai l er park . 2 It "t1oul d not be physically and economically possibl e to operate a tra i l er park, according to the Depart ment of Housing and Community Devel opment requirements . 3) Even though the members of the Commission recognize the applicant ' s effort to create a sel f - supporting unit over the past years, the existing violations, i f condoned, could serve as a precedent for simi lar l and uses i n thi s County . 2i3 The Commission further requested that this matter be r eferred to respective County departments to start the abatement of presently existing violations . It was noted that during the pub l i c heari ng on August 26 , 1970, the Commission and staff spent approximatel y 2 hours i ns pecting the proper ty in question . Jean Pritchard from the Trout Cl ub s poke in opposition to the granting of the appeal as well as Bai l ey Killi ngsworth, and fe l t the Board shoul d proceed today i nasmuch as the Planning Commission made the fie l d t r i p to i ns pect the proper t y Supervisor Grant recommended that the Board pr oceed with the hearing this date, and the Chairman announced that the Board woul d proceed with the hearing. H. H. Divelbiss, Planning Director, described the proper ty as shown on a transparency, being on Ol d San Marcos Pass Road north of the intersection wi th Ol d San Marcos Road northerly of the Trout Cl. ub on the west side of the highway, down from the Hidden Val ley Guest Ranch area . The property has been before the County for a great many years . The Commission made a f i e l d trip and found that the property was bei ng used for this c amp tent tra i l er t ype of ope ration. Mr. Haeckel has voided a road down the s i de of the hill to the creek and placed 10 trail ers and tents in the area . Al so, there are three or four dry outhouses . After heari ng from the Forest Servi ce and State Hous i ng people , the Pl anni ng Commission fe l t that it was unwi se to have this kind of devel opment in this kind of country . The Trout Cl ub peopl e a re quite concer ned . The Commission requested immedi ate enforcement of the ordinance . This was done wi th l egal approvaJ so this has been i n viol at i on for months . Supervi sor Grant stated that Mr . -Haeckel had fi l ed a l etter with him but it pertains a l most entirel y to a r oad system. The road was discussed ful ly at the Planni ng Commission heari ng . DonaJd Detwiler from the Heal th Depar tment made a repor t to the Board, stat i ng that the Department ' s positi on is for f lat deni al because of difficul ties as to adequate~y handl i ng potable wat er and sewage' dispos al . There are three plateaus with a number of tra i l ers . They get drinking water f r om San Jose Creek. They have been t r ying to legal i ze this by issuance of a permit but to date Mr . Haecke~ has not presented an adequate amount of dat a upon which they can make an analysis of the system or issue a permit . He l egally must obta i n a permit for a small water system to serve more than j ust his own property . He s aid this is ~ poor location fo: t rai l e r s and t he t rpi Jers ere quite di lapidated. He had r eceived a l etter from the State to ce ase and des ist . 214 Mental Healt Services Budget lteview. I October 26, 1970 The Dep ~ rtment feel s thet i n the event the Board approves the request, the matter of a sewage disposal system woul d have to be of special design with t anks but would require routine pumping on an ''as needed basis'' . He reiterated the Department woul d r ather see a f l at denial. Mr . Detwiler proceeded to explain the water system. It is an existing system but it has not been legelized. Supervisor Grant fe l t the appeal should be denied as the Planning Commission had a full hearing and visited the property, spent considerable time, took photos, and made a thorough i nvestigation. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Cc?llahan, and car ried unanimous l y , it is ordered that the appeal of Ernest Haeckel (70-RZ-38) from Planning Commission denial of the following requests be, and the s ame is hereby, denied, ther eby reaffirming the action taken by the Commission to deny subject requests : 1) To i nitiate an ordinance amending Article IV of Ordinance No . 661 of the County of Santa Barbara , as amended, rezoning proper ty descr ibed as Assessor ' s Parcel No . 153-160-26 , generally l ocated on the west side of San Marcos Pass Road approximateJy 1/4 mil e northerl y from the inter section of Old San Marcos Pass Road, Gol eta Valley from the ''U'', Unlimited Agricultura l District (permits r esidential and agricultural uses on 10-acre buil ding sites) to the WA-T, Watershed Agricultura l District with the Tra i l er Park Zone Combining Regul ations (permits residential and agricultural uses on one-acre buil ding sites and a t railer perk subject to issuance of a Conditional Use Permit, of said or dinance; and 2) A Conditiona l Exception under Articl e X, Section 4 and the provisions of Ordinance No . 661 of the County of Santa Barbara , as amended, to permit ten (10) trai l er sites instead of the required twenty (20, si tes. In the Matter of Ment al Heal th Services Budget Review . The Administrative Officer read his written report on subject matter, dated October 26 , 1970 . Fol lowing submission of the S. B. County Mental Health Services Short- Doyl e Plan for FY 1970- 71 to the State Department of Ment al Hygiene for approval , the State, in April , 1970, informed this County that an expenditure plan totalling $2,231,057 plus State hospita l charges was approved for pl anning purposes . This is refl ected in the County budget . These amounts woul d only become fina l upon enactment of the State' s FY 1970- 71 budget by the Legislature and the Governor . Following approval of the County 1970- 71 budget, the State informed administration that the County program for mental health services for 1970- 71 had been approved with an a l location of State aid of onJy $J ,202,468 , based upon a reduced expenditure pl an totalling $1 ,993,050. This unPnticipated drastic budget reduction by the State, following the adoption of the County's budget, together with other developments i n the County ' s mental heaJth program, require Board review and subsequent pol icy decision. The probl em is a complex one, since it consists of several interre lated ar e as of concern. Mr . Johnson proceeded to define the prob l ems, as follows: I October 26 , 1970 215 I 1) The State- approved Expenditure Plan has been substantiall y reduced since adoption of the County budget (1970-71) . 2) The State plan has not given full recognition to a r ising census in the Psychiatric In-Patient Ward. 3) The Mental Heal th Department ' s estimat' es of patient-generated revenue as presented in the State program have not been forthcoming . 4) While the County budget patient- generated revenue estimates-were reduced to reflect a more realistic patient-generated revenue recovery, the State pr ogram was never adj'usted to coincide with the County revenue estimates . 5) There exists a lack of c l early documented fiscal policy from the State level . In discussing the problems relative to reduction i n the State-approved Expenditure Plan , it was poi nted out that the participation of the State to l imit reimbursement of $1,202,468, is the approved Expenditure Plan less estimated revenue, less 10% County share, less a State-estimated savings factor. Reflected in these figures was notification by the State that the new and expanded portion of the program, amounting to $238 ,007, was being cut for an indefinite time. Thus, without question, it becomes necessary to reduce the expenditure program by at l east $238 ,007 . The operation of the l ocal mental health program is financed and budgeted by the County, not by the State. The State reimburses the County up to the Stateapproved expenditure limit. He also discussed the rising census in the Psychiatric In-Patient Ward which was cal culated and necessary costs buil t i nto the budget, but the State Plan was not changed . The County budget included $523, 600 for FY 1970-71 , the State Program contai ned a figure of $406,428 - a difference of $117, 172. Other items discussed were lack of rea] izatipn of anticipated patientgenerated revenue, l ack of adjustment of State program patient-generated revenue esti mate, and ambiguity of State policy . Mr . Johnson stressed the importance of the Director of Mental Health Ser vices exerting every effort to increase collections on charges for services . If revenues cannot be realized, the burden falls on the County taxpayer . It appears that the Mental Health Department has never adjusted the State plan to ref]ect the more conservative revenue picture. Once again, if the County falls below the Stateestimated revenue, the burden may fal l upon the County taxpayer ~ There exists a l ack of clearly documented fiscal pol icy and commitment from the State. The State provided the County with a planning expenditure amount that later proved to be unrealistic, and this was not decreased by the State until after adoption of the final County budget . It appears that the State is gambl ing that the County will not spend to the total expenditure program. If State funds are unavailabl e, its savings factor will have to be assumed by the County if the entire State- approved expenditure allocation is spent . The State has not documented whether or not its $212,200 wi ll become ava i lable, but its actions would i ndicate that it is making every effor t to reali ze State savings at County expense . The following recommendations were made: 216 October 26 , 1970 1) That the Board freeze all appropriations within the Mental Heal th budget at the current l evel of expenditure, as fo l lows: a) b) Sal aries and Empl oyee Benefits Services and suppl ies Fixed assets Total $209,645 58,370 34,560 $302,575 2) That the Board reduce the per diem rate for in- patient psychiatric services from $68 per day to $59 per day, effective November 1, 1970 . 3) That the Board direct the Administrative Officer, Hospital Administrator and Mental Health Director to work col l ectivel y toward a reor ganization of the hospital ' s in-patient psychiatr ic ward to bring about a desired coor dinated effort . Such r eor ganization to be made effective January 1, 1971 if concurrence of all involved is achieved. 4) That the Board direct the Mental Heal th Director to expedite the determination of the cost of al l out- patient services; and, to present such cost determination to the Administrative Officer and Auditor-Contr oller for review in order that specific recommendations can be made to the Board to set rates for such services . Al so, direct the Mental Health Director to start an aggressive bill ing pr ogram to patients and/or responsible parties as wel l as to the Medi- Ca] Pr ogram. 5) That the Board direct the Administrative Officer and Mental Heal th Director aggressively seek out al l availabl e means of achieving I further savings in the Mental Health Department budget together with expl oring all avenues of acquiring further State funds In conclusion , Mr . Johnson said that the freezing of $302,575 in County appropriations will keep the mental health program at its present l evel of service and wil l minimize the amount of additional unanticipated costs which the General Fund (taxpayer) wil l have to absorb . Provided that all or part of the $212,200 estimated State savings is restored, then part of the frozen appropr iations may be rel eased for expenditure by the Board. Dr . Norbert J . McNamar e , Director of Mental He ~l th Services indicated his concern with the report and r ecommendations of the Administrative Officer . He said the prob l em is an extremel y compl ex one . A written presentation of his was then given to the ~o a rd . There a re two major pr obl ems, both of which focus around funding. The first one is that, because of budget probJems, the State Legis lature removed $3\ mil lion from the Governor ' s budget for County Mental Health Programs . This cut had to be divided pr imaril y among the newer programs that had not yet fi lled all their positions and, therefore, coul d e l iminate them without rel easing peopl e alr eady hir ed. Sant a Barbara County's share of tha t total was $238 ,000, or approximatel y 11% of the mentcl health budget . Ment al He~J th Services has devel oped a pl an approved by the Mental Health Advisory Board for effecting these cuts and has received informal approval from the Stete. One area receiving an unf sir share of the cuts was for the program i nvol ving mi nor i ty poor. I 217 October 26, J 970 The second problem is mor e compl ex . last October , i n submitting the ment al health budget to the State f or this fiscal year , he did not anticipate accuratel y enough costs f or operation of the General Hospital Psychiat r ic Unit. The Hosp ital ' s estimate of $406, 000 to run the Unit this fisc al year actually seemed excessive to some last October. It was aJ most 40% more than i n t he previous year ' s budget; but now, considering his exper ience of the Jast 4 months, it appears that costs coul d r un as high as $525 , 000 . By subracting the l J.% cut from the $406 , 000 estimate, it means there coul d be a cost overrun as high as $160,000. The maj or probl em here is that he understands the needs and did not request enough money from the State. As a means of s olving the probl em to some extent , all mental heal th ser vices coul d be unified into one system which woul d gr e at l y increase efficiency and effect considerabl e economy . The present two systems allows for much dupl ication and waste . With this unification, it coul d l imit the potential overr un to $70,000 and possibl y l ess, and this plan woul d allow mental health to remain within its County budget . But it woul d run the r isk of this $70,000 being all County money without 90% state reimbursement, but there has been no written guar antee to match this $70,000 overr un at the end of the year either by surpl us elsewhere in their budget or by an emer gency l egis lative appropr iation. By t aking the risk, if they do r eimburse the County, it will have $63,000 excess at the end of this fiscal year in the mental health budget . If they don ' t r eimburse the County, ther e a re advant ages to the County. Having s pent the money this ye ar wil l obl igate the State to fund it next year and pr event this probl em f r om being compounded in future years . He and the Mental Health Advisory Board fee l this is the onl y plan that can presentl y be r ecommended . Any attempts at fur ther reducing the potenti al $70,000 over run woul d present serious funding pr obl ems for the future . He then proceeded to give some alternatives, such as: 1) Limiting admi ssions to the Genera] Hospital so that the total number of patients woul d remai n within the present budget . 2) Further r educing other a reas of mental health budget to effect a $70,000 s aving . Aside f r om the f act that the State would probably not approve such a plan, it is, more importantly, f alse economy for the County . Making any fur ther r eductions i n the out- patient type of services would i nc r ease the number of patients requir ing hospitalization . Such 8n event could r e adil y doubl e or t r ipl e the roverr un from the General Hospital services for this fiscal year, and woul d worsen the funding probl ems next yea r . The oxtut:Lns budget for next year woul d be r educed by any amount cu ' now . 3) Devel op a f acil ity that coul d provide psychiatric care at a l ower cost than the General Hospital . This has some merit since psychia t r ic patients usually don ' t need the extensive and expensive f acil ities of a general hospital . Dr . McNamara has expl ored this at gr eat l ength with the Administrative Officer and Hospital Administrator, and they both fee] that the dis advant ages to 218 I ----- --- - - - October 26, 1970 the County outweigh any benefits for the ment al health budget . It appears s ome fur ther exploration here may be useful . In f airness to the State, if one understands the complexities and is willing to work within them, the mental health program is one that c an both benefit the State and County f inanc~ ally as wel l as benefit the health and wel f are of a l l its citizens - the key is under standing. Dr. McNamara went on to explain t hat by cutti ng a number of positions to effect a paper savi ngs, he would end up not being able to hire those peopl e and thi s would i ncrease the number of peopl e who are not gettirStreatment, and increase costs in ways tha t cannot be controlled. They want t o treat peopl e as out- patients, not ~n - patients. The focus is to get away from hospitals and get i nto an out- patient status . Mr . Johnson still disagreed with Dr . McNamar a on his statement that money cannot be shifted from s alaries to i n- patient care . He has found out that these monies can be shifted . This is one of the probl ems in dealing with a State- financed program. The money is not being allocated wher e it is needed . The Count y has a good mental health progr am going, and commended Dr . McNamara for his wor k . Al so, the in- patient r ate is one of the best in the State, being $68 .00 per day at present . Again , he stated that his great concern l ies in knowing wher e the money is coming from. Supervisor Grant asked about the discrepancies of this program throughout the State, and Dr . McNamara replied that the main r eason the County didn ' t get enough money is that they started l ate . He can only devel op with what money is given to him; hopefully, i t may get better l ater . The Administrative Officer said he would still r ecommend the figur e of $406,000, repr esenting a 40% increase in the budget for in- patient care . He indicated concern about the County ' s commitment that County mental health services wil l cost 10% of the di rect budget . It is his goal to agree to ar r ive at that point . Supervisor Tunnell felt it woul d be wise to hol d firm about paying 10% and no more . There is not enough money to expedite al l the programs . Dr . McNamara said if the Board goes for that the County may still get the $70,000. Supervisor Tunnell also fe l t the Board shoul d accept the recommendation of Mr . Johnson to freeze the $302,000, to cut back the program to fit the County budget . It was suggested the subject matter be continued a week to allow administration to try to get the State to firm up on some probl em areas . It was stated that the Counties that started on the program 5 year s ago will get more money from the State. The bigger counties get a bigger pi ece than this county. The cost at the State hospital is much higher. It was $6 per day and it is now $30. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell , seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimous l y, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, con- . tinued to November 2, 1970, and referred to the Admi n i strative Officer, Director of Mental Heal th Services and other s for further study i n an attempt to come up with an answer . Upon motion the Board adjourned sine die . The foregoing Minutes are hereby appr oved. rm an Board . Approval of Minutes October 26, 1970 Meeting. Amendment to Fire Hydrant Agreement btw. Goleta County Water Dist. ~ S. B. Co. Fire Protection Dist.-Installation ~ Use of 6 Fire Hydrants in Goleta V ley Housing Proect Tract I 10, 988. I 219 November 2, 1970 Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, p State of California, November 2, 1970 , at 9:30 o ' clock, a .m. Present: Supervisors George H. Clyde, Joe J. 0 Callahan, Francis H. Beattie 2 and Curtis I Tunnell; and J. E. Lewis, Clerk and Daniel G. Grant Supervisor Clyde in the Chair In the Matter of Approval of Minutes of October 26, 1970 Meeting. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the reading of the minutes of the October 26, 1970 meeting be dispensed with, and the minutes approved, as submitted In the Matter of Execution of Amendment to Fire Hydrant Agreement between Goleta County Water District and Santa Barbara County Fire Protection District, Special Fire Protection Zone #5 Covering Installation and Use of 6 Fire Hydrants in Goleta Valley Housing, Job No . 1350 and Tract #10,988 (Fireside Homes), Job No . 1282. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO . 70-660 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) Abandomnent Vacat of a Portion of on In the Matter of the Abandonment and Vacation of A Portion of A Certain Dominion Rd. J Acceptance of ''A'' ght of Way Gra t rom Robert P. hee~y, et we, f r St. McCoy Lan I Change Orders Nos. 1-4, San Ysidro Rd. Project. / County Highway, Known as Dominion Road i n the Fifth Supervisorial District . (ORDER TO ABANDON) Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted : RESOLUTION NO . 70-661 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Acceptance of Right of Way Grant from Robert P. Sheehy, et we, for ''A'' Street and McCoy Lane, Fifth Supervisorial District, without Monetary Consideration. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Right of Way Grant, dated October 16, 1970 from Robert P. Sheehy, Terrance W. Sheehy and June Sheehy, for ''A'' Street and McCoy Lane, Fifth Supervisorial District be, and the same is hereby, accepted, without monetary consideration; and the Clerk be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to record said document in the office of the Santa Barbara County Recorder . In the Matter of Authorizing Chairman to Execute Change Orders Nos . 1 through 4 to Contract with C. W. Berry Construction Company for San Ysidro Road Project No . 1005.1, First Supervisorial District. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to execute the following Change Orders to contract with C. W. Berry Construction Company for San Ysidro Road Project No . 1005. 1, First Supervisorial District: , 220 Notice of Completion fo Constr. of Hollister Ave 0.17 Mile Eas of Auhay Dr. Turnpike Rd. I 0 November 2, 1970 Change Order No . 1 for i ncrease of $1,631 . 32 . Change Order No 2 for i ncrease of $197 . 48 Change Order No . 3 for i ncrease of $300 . 73. Change Order No . 4 for i ncrease of $201 . 71 . Total Increase $2,331. 24 In the Matter of Filing of Notice of Completion for Construction of Hollister Avenue from 0 .17 Mile East of Auhay Drive (Near San Antoni o Road) to Turnpike Road. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Road Commissioner be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to file Notice of Completion f or "Construction of Hollister Avenue from 0.17 Mile East of Auhay Drive (Near San Antonio Road) to Turnpike Road'' . It is further ordered that the Clerk be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to record said document in the office of the Santa Barbara County Recorder. Acceptance "of In the Matter of Reconnnendation of Road Commissioner for Acceptance of Dedicated Sts Release of Dedicated Streets and Release of 85% of Time Certi ficate of Deposit No . 210361 for 85% of Time Certificate $19,350.00, for Tract #10,574, Fourth Supervisorial District . for Tract # 10,574. I Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and Release of all Co. Cla~ for Damages to Co. Proper from Vehicula Accident. / Release of Open Space Bond for Trac #10,846, Lot 138, ~Accept of Open Space for Maintenan I carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, re- erred to the County Counsel for report and reconmendation. In the Matter of Execution of Release of All County Claims for Damages to County Property Resulting from Vehicular Accident, in the Amount of $11 . 14. y Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute a Release of all County claims for damages to County property resulting from a vehicular accident, as follows: William Eugene Mafadini, in the amount of $9 .14 plus $2 . 00 court costs, a total of $11 . 14, for accident on January 13, 1968. It is further ordered that the Director, Department of Resources & Collections be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to deposit the draft received in full settlement therefor to the Road Fund. In the Matter of Release of Open Space Bond for Tract #10,846, Lot 138, and Acceptance of Open Space for Maintenance . nee Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and e carried unanimously, it is ordered that the following open space bond for Tract #10,846, Lot 138 be, and the same is hereby, released as to all future acts and conditions; and that the open space be accepted for maintenance: General Insurance Company of America, as Surety - University Exchange Corporation, as Principal for Bond No. 728763, dated May 21, 1969, in the amount of $10,000.00. Release of Monument !ond for Tract I 11,035. I One-Yr. Time Extension for Monume Bonds on Tracts # 10,311 Unit 2 1 10,237 Unit 2.1 Approval of Request for Military Traini Leave. I .Waivers of Physica Standards of Prospective Employees. Refund from So. Ca. Gas Company / Request for Permit to Enter, Cross Leave Hope Ranch Area during Rik for Hungry, Nov. 14, 1970. November 2, 1970 In the Matter of Recommendation of Assistant Count y Surveyor for Release of Monument Bond for Tract #11,035, in the Cash Amount of $450 . 00. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the monument bond for Tract #11,035, in the - c ash amount of $450 . 00 be, and the same is hereby, released as to all future acts and conditions, as recommended by the Assistant County Surveyor In the Matter of Recommendation of Assistant County Surveyor for One-Year Time Extension for Monument Bonds on Tracts #10,311, Unit #2 and Tract #10,237, Unit #2 . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that a one-year time extension for monument bonds on the follpwing tracts be, and the same is hereby, granted, as recommended by the Assistant County Surveyor: Tract #10,237, Unit #2, Third District . Tract #10,311, Unit #2, Third District. In the Matter of Approval of Request for Military Training Leave . 221 Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the request of the District Attorney for a militar,y training leave, with pay for S. Jon Gudmunds, Deputy District Attorney be, and the same is hereby, approved, during the period from November 23-December 5, 1970, inclusive. In the Matter of Approval of Requests for Waivers of Physical Standards of Prospective Employees . Upon motion -0f Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and . carried unanimously, it is ordered that the following requests for waivers of physical standards of pr-0spective employees be, and the same are hereby, approved: Welfare Department - Miss Margery Wilson, Clerk S . B. General Hospital - Daniel G. Fulton, Janitor. In the Matter of Acceptance of Refund in the Amount of $30 . 71 from Southern California Gas Company under Contract for Gas Stub Services, 400 Ellwood Beach Drive. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the refund from Southern Claifornia Gas Company, in the amount of $30 . 71, under contract for gas stub services 400 Ellwood Beach Drive I be, and the same is hereby, accepted, for deposit to Ellwood Acres Assessment District 1963-1 Construction Fund. In the Matter of Request of United Nations Association of USA, S. B. (TriCounty Chapter) for Permit to Enter, Cross and Leave Hope Ranch Area during Hike for Hungry, on November 14, 1970. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the Sheriff. 222 November 2, 1970 Request for Info. re Futu of Water Control " Water Quality in S.B. Co. / In the Matter of Request of Los Angeles Laundryo,1ner!l Association for Ine formation r~ Future of Water Control and Water Quality in Santa Barbara County. Request for Info. re Impact of Sierr Club's Lawsuit, against Affected Governmental Units. I Approval of Rider to Oil Drilling Bond and/or Releas I Publication of Ordinance No. 2123 I Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the Health Officer . In the Matter of Request of Dorothy F. Nuttall for Information Regarding Impact of Sierra Club ' s Lawsuit , against Affected Governmental Units . Upon moti on of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to County Counsel . In the Matter of Reconnnendation of County Petroleum Engineer for Approval of Rider to Oil Drilling Bond and/or Release . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, .it is ordered that the following rider to oil drilling bond be , and the same is hereby~ approved, pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance No . 1927 and the recommendation of the Oil Petroleum Engineer: ~ shell Oil Company - Travelers Indemnity rider to Blanket Bond No . S- 305 covering wells ''Lloyd et al, 2 and 3'', and ''Security Fee 13 thru 20'', County Permits Nos . 3494 through 3503, respectively . It is further ordered that the riders to the following oil drilling bonds be, and the same is hereby, released as to all future acts and conditions: / Continental Oil Company - Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company Blanket Bond No . 3507930 CQ.vering well ''State 4031. 1-1 (61- 1)'', County Permit No . 3327 . / Home-Stake Production Company - American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania, Blanket Bond No . 547 1713 covering ''Victory Wells 14, 15, 17'', County Permits Nos . 334, 335, 336 (NPN) In the Matter of Publication of Ordinance No . 2123 . It appearing from the Affidavit of the Principal Clerk of the Santa Barbara News- Press that Ordinance No . 2123 has been duly published in the manner and form prescribed by law; Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded py Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is determined that Ordinance No . 2123 has been duly published in the manner and form prescribed by law. Reports and Coonunication In the Matter of Reports and Communications . I . The following reports and connnunications were received by the Board and ordered placed on file: / County Treasurer - Investment of temporary surplus moneys, September, 1970 Reports from Planning Comniss ion for Info. Only. / Reco11111endation re Alleged Violation of Conditions by Oilfield Waste UDIPI Co.-Cat Canyon Are / November 2, 1970 1 Public Utilities Commission - Notice of removal from calendar the application of Golden West Airlines, Inc . for public convenience and necessary certif- icate to provide passenger air carrier service to and from Santa Maria Airport ; Public Utilities Commission - Second amended application of Air West for Authorization to increase intrastat e passenger fares . / State Dept . of Insurance - Order to Cease and Desist and notice of hearing in matter of United Bonding Insurance Company, November 16, 1970, in Los Angeles, 10 a .m. In the Matter of Reports from Planning Commission for Information only . The followi ng reports were received by the Board for informat ion only and ordered placed on file: / l) Hope Ranch Realty Investment Company, denied appeal of Health Department requirement of Condition #2 {percolation tests), Lot Split No . 11,230 approximately 3,000 feet east of intersection of Vieja Drive and Via Vistosa, Third District / 2) A. B. Cannella, denied request {70- CP- 62) for Conditional Use Permit to allow sale of fresh fruit from motor vehicle at 511 5th Street, Solvang In the Matter of Planning Commission Recommendation Relative to Alleged Violation of Conditions by Oilfield Waste Dump Company {70-V-18) Generally Located 5 Miles North of Highway 101 on South Side of Cat Canyon Road, Cat Canyon Area, Fifth Supervisorial District . 223 The Planning Commission submitted a written recommendation on subject matter as set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No . 70 -112 of October 28, 1970, that the Board direct all appropriate departments to take immediate acti on to force compliance with the conditions imposed under Conditional Exception under Article X, Section 4 and the ''U'' - Unlimited Agricultural District of Ordinance No . 661 and a permit under provisions of Chapter 19 of the County Code to allow the recovery of waste oil and dump site for waste oil, mud and water from oil companies and waste oil from service stations, Assessor ' s Parcel Nos . 101-060-15 and 101-070-32, generally located 5 miles north of U. s. Highway 101 on the south side of Cat Canyon Road, Cat Canyon area. Supervisor Tunnell reported the question of the location of an oilfield dump site has been the subject of numerous discussions at meetings over a period of months . Everyone is concerned to protect the landscape and the general ecological conditions in the area . Companies are now required to dispose of their waste materials in a more organized and more proper manner than before. This has not proven to be an easy thing to resolve . He suggested the appointment of a committee to s t udy and report back to the Board the feasibility of alternatives - whether or not the County 224 Reactivation of 1st Dist. Citizens Co to Circulatio Element re Montecito, Smmerland, Carpinteria Valley Area. I Abandonment o Rancho Cuyama No. 2 subdivision to Clear Way for Action re Pending Lot Split No. 11, / Request of Billy Hale fo Permit to all Use of Mobile Home as Temp. Dwelling on property in S nta Ynez Valley (Chalk Hill Rd) I Execution of Amendment bet Co. ArendtMosber- Grant, Architects, t Perform Svs. re additions Alterations to S.B. Genl Hospital / November 2, 1970 should operate and endeavor to establish and operate a County-owned dump for waste materials and in the future possibly other industrial waste materials that are difficult to dispose of. Perhaps the public interest would best be served with the appointment I of such a committee . He suggested no action be taken for several weeks on the present permit and cont inue this matter until the committee can be appointed to study this . 1Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the matter of the Conditional Use Permit on sub- ject matter referred from the Planning Commission be, and the same is hereby, con- tinued to Monday, November 16, 1970. 1 It is further ordered that a committee consisting of the Petroleum Engineer, County Counsel, Public Works Director, and Planning Director to study the feasibility and advisability of establishing and operating a County-owned dump for waste materials and report back to the Board on Monday, November 16, 1970 In the Matt er of Planning Commi ssi on Recommendation for Reactivation of First District Ci t i zens Committee on Board Referral Re Proposed Amendment (70-GP- 2) to Circulation Element of General Plan of Santa Barbara County Pertaining to Montecito , Summerland and Carpinteria Valley Area . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, con- tinued to Monday, November 16, 1970, at the request of Chairman Clyde In the Matter of Recommendation of Subdivision Committee for Abandonment of Rancho Cuyama No . 2 Subdivision, Approved in 1916, to Clear Way for Action Re Pending Lot Split No . 11,238 . 38. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the County Counsel for report and recommendation. In the Matter of Planning Commission Recommendation for Approval of Conditional Exception of 90 Days from Request of Billy Hale (70 -V- 55) to Allow Use of Mobile Home as Temporary Dwelling for 2 Years while Completing Barn and Building Residence on Property Located Approximately 1,800 Feet Westerly of Ballard Canyon Road and Approximately 1,7 Miles Northerly of Chalk Hill Road, Santa Ynez Valley. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the recommendation of the Planning Commission for approval of a Conditional Exception for 90 days, from the request of Billy Hale (70 - . V-55) under the provisions of Section 4 of Article X and the 5-AG Distri ct to use a ' mobile home as a temporary dwelling for two years while completing barn and building ' residence on Assessor ' s Parcel No . 137- 010- 29, generally located approximately 1,800 feet westerly of Ballard Canyon Road and approximately 1,7 miles northerly of Chalk Hill Road, Santa Ynez Valley be, and the same is hereby, confirmed . In the Matter of Execution of Amendment to Agreement between the County of Santa Barbara and Arendt-Mosher- Grant, Architects, to Perform Services i n Connection with Additions and Alterations to Santa Barbara General Hospi tal . (Surgical Floor) Resolution Authoriz Ventura Co. to Act Agent for s. B. Co. in Applying for Fe Reimburesement of Expenses during Assistance in Rece Ventura Fire. J Report and Reconme of the Ad Hoc Co11111. on Narcotics and Drug Abuse. I Amend Ordinance 66 to Allow Trailer - Truck Rental in Certain Comnercial Districts subject to Conditional Use Permit. I November 2, 1970 Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted : ng 8 RESOLUTION NO . 70-662 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Resolution Authorizing Ventura County to Act as Agent for Santa Barbara County in Applying for Federal Reimbursement of Expenditures by Santa Barbara County Incurred in Rendering Mutual Aid Assistance in Recent Ventura Fire. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO . 70-6G3 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) at ion In the Matter of Report and Recommendation on Report of October 4, 1970 of the Ad Hoc Committee on Narcotics and Drug Abuse. 225 Upon motion of Supervisor Callahan, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, continued to Monday, November 9, 1970, when the report from the Chairman of the Committee, Lorenzo Dall Armi, County Superintendent of Schools, is expected to be submitted to the Board. In the Matter of Planning Conmission Recommendation from Board Referral (70- 0A- 15) for Adoption of Ordinance Amending Article XI of Ordinance No . 661 to Allow Trailer and Truck Rental in Certain Commercial Districts Subject to Conditional Use Permit. The Planning Commission recommendation on subject proposal was in opposition to adoption of the proposed ordinance amendment on the following basis : 1) If a need for utility trailer and truck rental exists, it should be treated as any other commercial use and located in a properly zoned district . 2) Rental use is permitted, by determination, as a matter of right i n C-3, General Commercial and heavier use districts exist i n the County . 3) In the Commission's opinion, such rental use is not accessory and incidental to service station use and should not be permitted in connection therewith. I The Clerk read a communication from ACECO, I nc . in agreement with the findings of the Planning Commission. Also, they have seen at least two truck and trailer outlets in the Goleta area that are not in gas stations and located in C-3 zoning areas . Britt Johnson of the planning staff, briefed the Board on the background of the proposal . In the survey made, there were approximately 19 stations that had some form of rental. If the amendment is not put into the ordinance, the Planning Department will commence proceedings for zoning violations . There is some C-3 zoning located approximately 400/500 feet south of Hollister Avenue in the township . There is a great deal of C-3 already occupied by other uses . Some of the uses in the area are rental but more are contractors' equipment rental . In this case, the Planning 226 Awarding Bid fer Goleta Pi r Repair I Mental Health Services Budget Review. / November 2, 1970 Commission felt, in connection with the language of the ordinance, that the rent al is not for the conveni ence of t he travellers on the highways but for people living in any given area. That was the basis for the original thinking. There were representatives from all five districts in opposition to this amendment during Commission deliberations as well as a letter from the General Council Rental Association of Southern California . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell , and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the recommendation of the Planning Commission for denial of adoption of an ordinance amending Article XI of Ordi nance No . 661 of the County of Santa Barbara, as amended, to allow trailer and truck rental in certain commercial districts subject to a Conditional Use Permit , as referred from the Board of Supervisors (70-0A-15) be, and the same is hereby, confirmed. In the Matter of Awarding Bid for Goleta Pier Repair . The Affidavit of Publication being on file with the Clerk, the following bids were opened at a meeting held on October 29, 1970; the roll was called, and representatives of the following departments were present: County Counsel , Public Works; and J . E. Lewis, County Clerk: Trautwein Brothers Iversen Construction Don Greene John Blakemore Penhall Marine, Inc . R. McGray, Inc . The engineer ' s estimate was $36,000.00 $49,832 .12 $44,450.00 $66,980.00 $54, 780 .00 $49,764.00 $37,393.00 Following referral to the County Counsel and the Public Works Di rector, the Director of Public Works submitted a written report and recommendation to award the contract to R. McGray, Inc ., the low bidder . It appearing that the bid of R. McGray, Inc . , 2015 S. Broadway, Santa Maria, California, in the amount of $37,393. 00 , is the lowest and best bid received from a responsible bidder, and that said bid i s satisfactory and in accordance with the notice inviting bids for said project; Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it i s ordered that the bid of R. McGray, Inc . , in the amount of $37,393.00 be accepted, and that the contract for said project be awarded to the said contractor from Account 180 C 2, at the price and upon the terms and conditions set forth in said bid and in said notice inviting bids . It i s further ordered that the Public Works Director be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to prepare the necessary contract for the work; and the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute said contract In t he Matter of Mental Health Services Budget Review. Upon motion of Supervisor Callahan, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and car- ried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, continued to Monday, November 9, 1970, at 10 o ' clock, a .m. , at the request of the Administrative Officer I Mental Health Advisory Bd Annual Report for FY 1969- . 70. I Annual Report of S.B. Co. Mental Health Services during FJ 1969-70. I Revised ''LEMRAS'' .Agreement btw Co. " IBM Corp. for Sheritf' a Dept. ( Recomnendation Negotiate for Fed. Funds for Pur chase of Park Land in I. V. in Keepin with Genl Plan. I 227 November 2, 1970 In t he Matter of Mental Health Advi sory Board Annual Report for FY 1969-70 . Mrs . Jeanette Gerson, Secretary of the Mental Health Advisory Board, presented and read to the Board the annual report for FY 1969- 70 of the Mental Health Advisory Board, which was r eceived very well . Mr . Elmer L. Shirrell, Vice-Chairman of the Mental Health Advisory Board, also made a presentation. Mrs . Gerson stated that this group is the most hardworking, dedicated communit y Board she has ever served on. They are seriously involved in all the mental health problems in all sections .of the County. Upon motion of Supervisor Callahan, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject report be, and the same is hereby, accepted for .filing . In the Matter of Annual Report of S. B. County Mental Health Services during FY 1969- 70 . Dr. J . Norbert McNamara, M. D. , Director of Mental Health Services in the County, made a presentation and submitted subject written report to the Board. The following recommended priorities for FY 1910-71 were submi tted: 1) Recruitment of needed pro~ssional staff, especiall y full - time psychiatrists and clinical psychologists . 2) Intensification of services to meet the needs of the low- income minority groups . 3) Expansion of programs in the nor t h County areas 4) Location of needed office and clinic space closer to the people who are in need of Mental Health Services . 5) Development of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Programs . 6) Integration of the mental retardation program within the Mental Health Services . Dr. McNamara announced that a lot of people deserve a lot of credit for their efforts with the mental health program. He pointed out that the State has ranked Santa Barbara County No . 2 of the most populous counties for performance last year, and is very proud of this record . Upon motion of Supervisor Callahan, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject report be, and the same is hereby, accepted for filing . In the Matter of Execution of Revised ''LEMRAS" (Law Enforcement Manpower Resources Allocation System) Agreement between the County of Santa Barbara and IBM Corporation :fb r Sheriff' s Department . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant , seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted : RESOLUTION NO . 70- 664 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Recommendation of Director of Parks to Negotiate for Federal Funds for Purchase of Park Land in Isla Vista in Keeping with County ' s General Plan for Redevelopment in Said Area. 228 Communicatio I November 2, 1970 Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, s econded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the recommendation of the Director of Parks to continue to work with UCSB and Isla Vista officials in an attempt to obtain funds, other than County funds, for the purchase of park land in Isla Vista be, and the s ame is hereby, confirmed . It is further ordered that any land acquired for park purposes be in keeping with the County ' s General Plan for the redevelopment of the Isla Vista area on file : In the Matter of Communications . The following communciations were received by the Board and ordered placed 1 Mrs . Jerry R. Seymour - the trouble wiuh cats . / Mrs . Eleanor A. Bursell - urging retention of Harris Grade in Lompoc . ; Mr . & Mrs . Billy H. Coker - recommendation to appoint Richard Henning as Director, District 1, Santa Ynez River Water Conservation District 1 s. B. Chapter, Sons of the American Revolution - resolution in opposition to National Training Laboratories in Group Development (Sensitivity Training) as related to public employees . I 1California Association of Soil Conservation Districts - fall meeting of Area VI, November 10, Oaks Inn, Ojai ; Alpine County Board of Supervisors - requesting revision of assessing practices of State Board of Equalization on State assessed property ~ Lake County Board of Supervisors - support of Proposition No . 1, General Election, the Clean Water Measure . ; Napa County Board of Supervisors - urging defeat of Proposition 18 (diversion of gas tax funds) . Proclaiming In the Matter of Proclaiming the Week of November 2-8, 1970 as ''Prisoner Week of Nov. 2-8 as ''Priso erof War Week'' . of War Week. I Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and car- Hearing Notic on Review of Method Alloca Highway User Nov. 13, 1970 in L.A. I ried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO . 70 - 665 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Hearing Notice from California Assembly Committee on i DSransportation on Review of Method Allocating Highway User Taxes, November 13, 1970, axes, in Los Angeles . Upon motion of Supervisor. Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the Road Commissioner . Rental ef Rd. Equip ment to Rex Flemi~g November 2, 1970 In the Matter of Rental of Road Equipment to Rex Fleming, Third Supervisorial District . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO . 70-665-A (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILES) Restoratien ef In the Matter of Telegram from State Office of Economic Opportunity in Recent Cutbacks in Ca. Head Start Fund Response from u. S. Senator George Murphy on Restoration of Recent Cutbacks in I Report on Time Limi Experiment to Close Certain I. V. Stree s to Motor Vehicle Traffic. / California ' s Head Start Funds (Community Action Commission) . Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, placed on file. In the Matter of Report from Isla Vista Community Council on Time Limit for Experiment to Close Certain Isla Vista Streets to Motor Vehicle Traffic . Jon Wheatley, Secretary-Treasurer of IVCC, made a presentation to the Board . He said the original motion passed by IVCC recommended the two stop signs with ba' rriers for a period of 90 days . Thepos:ition today is to leave things as they are . He urged the Board to accept the advice of the IVCC so there will be some degree of autonomy . The IVCC has stuck with its original motion and they have the ambiguity over the 90-day limit authorizing barriers . Supervisor Grant asked if the IVCC has considered any alternative - they only go one block . Pardall Road does have the high foot and bicycle traffic . Perhaps the IVCC should consider going east to the campus . Dr . Wheatley pointed out the need for traffic improvement in Isla Vista and this can be adjacent best with barriers . Stop signs and temporary closings are not necessarily effective . Tney will be giving recommendations on that in a short time . Andrew Simpson, Peace Commissioner of the IVCC,made a presentation . At the last meeting he appeared to give the results of the Pardall barrier survey which was performed by Jim Bell. The conclusions of the survey area that the barriers do promote pedestrian and bicycle safety: Business is down in Isla Vista but there is no conclusive proof that the barriers have damaged business . The Peace Commission studied this for a week and made these recommendations of the IVCC: That a general plan be implemented for land use, transportation in Isla Vista: That a traffic control study for all of Isla Vista be performed by the Planning Commission in cooperation with County Roads and present a report to the IVCC by the end of J anuary, 1971. The IVCC accepted the recommendations of the Peace Commission for the traffic situation, general 'plan, etc., with the exception of the Pardall barrier removal . The Pardall barriers are quite purposeful and useful . Supervisor Grant went on to say that he has rec~ived a personal pledge from others that they will accept this decision and work with the Planning Commission or IVCC to promote better traffic control . Jim Belilove displayed a graph resulting from a survey to get some facts about the Pardall barrier . 229 I --------=--=---------:--=---:--:------,:------------ - ------------------------------ 230 Allowance of Claims. I November 2, 1970 Ten students volunteered to take this survey by sitting on the street on the contested block of .Pardall all day long for two days counting the number of pedestrians, bicycles and automobiles . Leslie Baird of the Isla Vista Association made several comments . He was appreciative of the Road Commissioner checking with them before this particular plan was instituted. There has been a definite effort on the part of the County and the community _to improve the problems of traffic control . The_. e.~perimental aspect of the barrier is perhaps the most important because if there is no b~rri~r to check, one could not tell what effect this would have . The stop signs put; up ali:ea.dy show that traffic h~s slowed down. If this very study with the over-all plan be cont inued and focus put on by the community and County a great step will have been made in improving general conditions in Isla Vista. Supervisor Grant asked if the Association goes along with the 90 -day experimental period, but Mr . Baird could not comment . He said th.is is the first time barriers were put up and something was needed as a gauge or . c riteria- for the .e ventual effect . Supervisor Grant asked the Administrative Officer .about the .position of the County to acquire through t~e State Board of Equalization sales .tax rat es for an area ~ I like Isla Vista where a quartet: could be compared against another quarter, and Mr Johnson replied that he believes it is available. by areas but doesn ' t know if it is precise enough. . . r Supervisor Grant said .that on December 1 and 2 .the Board will sit as a Board ,. of Equaliz&tion to hear a lot of appeals from property owners in Isla Vista about property assessments, and there will be pleas that business is off in general in the area . He asked the Administrative Officer if there would be any significance to have the June summer quarter through September so the. Board could begin to get. a feeling on what the effect is in Isla Vista, and Mr. Johnson indicat~d ~e would try to secure the information . Dr . Wheatley said business is very bad i n Isla Vista but it has nothing to do with barri ers, it ' s because of the riots . He felt these figures would be i rrelevart to the barrier matter . Upon motion of Supervi sor Gr ant, s econded by Supervisor Beattie , and car r i ed unanimous~y , it i s ordered that the barriers on Pardall Road remain .for a 120- day period frqm September 24, 1970 or an earlier date, depending upon the survey The Board recessed until 2 o ' clock, p .m. At 2 o ' clock, p .m. the Board reconvened. , Present: Supervisors George H. C.lyde, Joe J . Callahan, , I Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, and I . Curtis Tunnell; and J . E ~ Lewis, Clerk. ; t 9 . : . Supervisor 9.lyde in the Chair In the matter of Allowance of Claims . I ' Upon motion, duly seconded, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the ' following claims be, and the same are hereby allowed, each claim for the amount and payable out of the fund designated on the face of each .claim, respectively, t 'o-wit: (SEE CLAIMS LIST PAGE 231) . ) November 2, 1970 231 ~ . , ; I AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER' SANTA BARBARA COUNTY NUMBER 11191 uns 1UM UBS 111 11117 lute 1181 11411 1111 lltll UtU , lMll - PAYEE ' PURPOSE . . ~ a. llallla ~., ae ._., . . ~ . 1 . . . . d CaJA 11411 11411 11t11 llit_IJ 11Alt 1Mll lltlt lWf 11418 . . . . .' . lltlt lltH IJtll lltll . UAll 11414 ' . ., , . l.fl*l. . C1iiNa Mw ci . - . ' ' : ; ~ . ,:. . SYMBOL 1 2. JI YaU Ua Uall UU - . 11 1' . JI 8 I WARRANT ALLOWED FOR 11.JI 9.M . . 111.os . ., . 20 71.at 11.19 U.AI . .'''. ,. . lt.11 . . , " u.so u . 1.u . ts.a.a . , l, . "" 1~114.'1 . . ' st.so ltl.M \ . ' REMARKS -- . . . J I I AUDITqR'S WARRANT REGISTER NUMBER lMll lltM 11427 SJ lit Utn llAll lltD lltN . 1181 . 'U.M uen . oat llttl ' UtJ. !&Mt , . . u 11 . 11 U. tf ll! 11 Ut 11al lltQ uss 11a lltU l.ltM 114Sf U PAYEE . .-.aM ICUwil' . . . . hiid.8i . lleft a. . , c. . . calif . $Hll . . 01'1 . . z "'Y Silt . 1 . - lldld. . ~--------. -.1. _ lilidUeaa. w . . la. u . ~ - .U lSB 'a. o.- , . 11tll SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PURPOSE . CC-71-ae) ., . 4119 . - . &. . . . . - . I SYMBOL uau uan . s , : , . . ~ ., * t 111 , .'.' a '7 " l nan ,. a I ll a a UUt DU ., . ., JA ltlaU 1uau 1e1 a J a. me WARRANT ALLOWED FOR . . ,. tu.11 u.es u.ts is.M " , 1 1.tn.u u . ,., S,Cl(QOO n.oo LIS . ll7 ll.JS lO.tt . 11 . .n.JO US. . ,. tl . _ . in.to . u. u. J-1.tt REMARKS ' -. AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER ' NUMBER PAYEE FUND SANTA BARBARA COUNTY -=-------DATE_ PURPOSE SYMBOL . iu11 .-.i . 111. u uoau l.IR7 UNI U lUlt UllJ 11111 WU , . llllt 11111 uu 11117 11111 UIU SIDI &1111 SIDI lllM llUI - aim r.a ._. 11111 . ~ISIU WUU. OJ&._ um 11111 ua UNI lllM , . 11119 1a1 11141 11141 Ultl .WtU.s "'1l'- ---- auu.w.u . ~ e.u . . __ _ . . . .;i - .a.u. . . . . -1 Ill a II 111 u UI at ll l~B IU a II Ill a 1S Ill 18 ' 1, m I WARRANT ALLOWED FOR n. . . in -~ . u 118 . 10 . ., . n.11 . .,. 1'1.tt is.a u . . u.11 . 10.00 t . .u U. u Ha.II 111 . ,. . . . n.11 . . REMARKS 111a''21.11 1na11u. NUMBER I II.Mt UMI Ultl 11111 11911 11111 111u J.lllt 1Ull UHi 7 au , ~ " ~ - . .-. ~ ~ . , AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANTA BARBARA COUNTY t FUND1__.:===------VATE,--'------'--'--.--.= --"-'--''- ' PAYEE _,. "."." __. . ~llliMtld u,.a~--.-- wuu.-. . ~. . ,._ PURPOSE r. . alw' SYMBOL UlaJa usa 11 I.II a II J.M IU in an uea 11 . . ut WARRANT ALLOWED FOR . 1'41 . "f' 111.11 11.n 1.1 . , . . . . t.Jll.tl 111 . . 111 111 lf"' 11111 UMI 11178 111'1 usn &U'll 1117 ''"' 11.IM IJl,J &1111 11nt ' . . ~ - . . . ., ~ , i.e. , . -. r.a . , . ,., . ., u.-. . . . I 14. ,_ 111 Ill. u 1 . l a , u 1na n u.an . I , ,. . &.Me . 211 . 117 . na . . . , 1&. i . , . REMARKS . - PR . AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ,. . FUND.-alt DATE . ,.,. PAYEE PURPOSE SYMBOL WARRANT NUMBER ALLOWED FOR REMARKS ' 11116 111 a II . Ul81 . . Ulll . Id ., ui IDOISif._'9 Ut.ts .i I.ft. J u.is 11111 UlaU US.II lllto cal&* oe . ,., 5 U91 , . ltl U .i. J.lHJ . il Ctn.lo) l ., 11 00 1. s . , u.oo 11 I ., . l7.' . ,. II at , t , ,. , J " . II a 3 ll.tl lN It . u no *' Wt u.u W u . , 17.t ' ,., Ult J.IO 17 s 11.so 11Stt ,. . (1' J . hJ .21 ., J.11,.11 1.1s 111 l JS.11 111. J UOaJ 10.IO lJl a I l.IO .as ' AC-1!57 . ' ' NUMBER PAYEE \ # . . AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER '. ' ~ SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PURPOSE , . ~ ' SYMBOL lM 1 a JA a.a. au itaM uaw llM ltaM Jf aM uaw aW . u ., ft. JA UW ft .au Ill al Utl4 110 a M ua JA utaM lltJA J.U 14 WARRANT ALLOWED FOR ,1 , . , . Utdl 7.A U9.U &LU u . J.,.M 11d1 ,'. ~ '.'.' 17 . -~ -~ SI.ti u . 1.71 ,. . . REMARKS l ~ NUMBER SUH U91 1lM &IUI 11 lUtl . lllU llfl6 UM lllJA . ' AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER ' f SANTA BARBARA COUNTY I FUND -------~DATE .,._. .H71 PAYE6 .-i ,. . . Md. ' llJi!aMMdY L . . . --. - w11. ~---- . . . . 11111 - .-.i. . J PURPOSE , ., , . . . . ' SYMBOL , J.tl ltoM Mt 17 111 Ml MO au MtM WARRANT ALLOWED FOR . . U.41 ,., . ., . i.m. ~ . , . -.u , . n.11 . f' REMARKS JAi ., , . tit. AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER ~ ' ' llll SANTA BARBARA COUNTY t - ' PAYEE PURPOSE SYMBOL WARRANT NUMBER ALLOWED FOR l11U. .i-. ._._, . , u II CI 1.u.1. . lUU ~~ a.111.11 114 n. n llJA , 111.n1.1t 11' fD Qis, 17*141.M 17.lfJ., 1Ul7 cnn, , . , 11118 .al . - . 119 a lt.41 JllJ.t -.i 1.11 . 11111 . w.n llAI . . . . JD a .,.11 aaaa ~- 1121 ='. 1uau 111.M la.ti U9a8 1U21 ., JbSU 1111 llf , . . "" . 1Ul7 a. . l198Q l ua fllill& - e. . , . . . ~ REMARKS . . . , . _ v . Ill a 9 J.M 111aIA1.11 .,. 1.11 - . ,AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER . . ~ NUMBER PAYEE ' .-711 ~JW. . , . ,., ~ o u.e. ,. uai.n .,., ., . I - ., -741 4'4i . , , . I-Ml . . . ~ . ._,. . , ., .u . ,. ~- ~, . ,ll . . ~_., .,., .,_TM f 711 . ,. ,.,, . ,. Nit . , ., WU. nunl . ' . , . SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ' '------DATE_ PURPOSE SYMBOL 40&1 . , 111A11 ., .*. 'i . 1'1(MJ \ WARRANT ALLOWED FOR . . , . l u.u . , w u . M.lt . n. . . u . w . &l4.U u . , 11-. I rl "' REMARKS I . ' . ' . ' ' ., AUDITOR'S 'WARRANT REGISTER f SANT A BARBARA CdUNTY \ I DATE --21 1111 I FUND , . . . I NUMBER PAYEE PURPOSE SYMBOL ALWLOAWRERDA NFTO R REMARKS ' u 1.Jlt.JI 1.11 ., 1 . - . . n. ' ' . .,. ~ . . . . : t ' a. , '\- 'I w.n1.1t ~. ' f l?.$41.M l . ' - ~ . , . . " . ., . - ~-----.------------------------------------------------------. 232 ,.r,., rA" November 2, 1970 "" . ' , Upon the roll being called, the following Supervisors voted Aye, to-wit: . George H. Clyde, Joe J~ Callahan, . Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell . NOES : None . ABSENT : None, . Requests for Appropriatio Cancellation, Funds . or Revision In the Matter of Requests for Appropri ation, Cancell at i on or Revision of of Funds. I Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried . unanimously, the following requests for appropriation, cancellation or revision of funds are hereby approved, in t he budget classifications and amounts shown, and the Auditor be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to make the necessary transfers: Superior Court - Transfer $910 .00 from 75-B-8 to 75-C- l, General Fund. ~~~e~rf~om In the Matter of Hearing on Planning Commission for Adoption of Ordinance Persoon to Amending Article IV of Ordi nance No . 661 to Rezone Property in Carpi nteria Valley from Rezone Prope . y in Carpinter 3-E-1-0 to A-1-X District Classification from Request of J ohn Mar Persoon (70-RZ-73) Valley / Ordinance 213 - to Rezone to A- 1-X-O . This being the date and time set for hearing on subject proposal; the Affidavit of Publication being on file with the Clerk; A communication was read by the Clerk from Mrs . George Sidenberg, Jr . Executive Vice-President of Carpinteria Valley Association in support of the request to rezone to A-1-x-o. There bei ng no furt her appearances or written statements submitted for or against subject proposal; Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and c ar ried unanimously, it is ordered that the recommendation of the Planning Commission to adopt an ordinance amending Article IV of Ordinance No . 661, as amended, of the County of Santa Barbara, to rezone property described as Assessor ' s Parcel No . 3-040-25, located approximately 400 feet northeasterly from the junction of Foothill Road and Linden Avenue, known as 4998 Foothill Road, Carpinteria Valley from the 3-E-1-0, Single Family Estate District, to the A-1-X District Exclusive Agricultural District, from the request of John Mar Persoon (70 - RZ - 73) to rezone to A- 1-X-O be, and the s ame is hereby, confirmed, and the Board passed and adopted the following ordinance: an Ordinance Amending Ordi ance 661~ /. In the Matter of Ordinance No . 2130 - An Ordinance Amending Ordinance No . 661 of the County of Santa Barbara , as Amended, by Adding Section 656 to Article IV of Said Ordinance. Upon the roll bei ng called, the following Supervisors voted Aye, to-wit: George H. Clyde, Joe J . Callahan, Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell . NOES: None . ABSENT: None. Request from Rancho Santa Barbara (Mace Corp) to Allow for Revised Development Plan to Permit Construction " Use of Li&htbouse - Gaviota Area. / Macco Corp Or di nan constr & use Li ~ht house I November 2, 1970 In the Matter of Hearing on Planning Commission Recommendation for Adoption of Ordinance Amending Section 581 of Article IV of Ordinance No . 661 from Request of Ranch Santa Barbara (Macco Corporation) (70- Rz-74) to Allow for Revised Development Plan to Permit Constr uction and Use of Lighthouse 90 Feet in Height for Operation and Maintenance by U. S. Coast Guard, Gaviota Area . This being the date and time set for hearing on subject proposal; the Affidavit of Publication being on file with the Clerk; Britt Johnson from the Planning Department, showed the area from a transparency, explaining this is a published text amendment to the planned commercial zoning which was approved by the Board some years ago . The U. s. Coast Guard has given official sanction on the lighthouse, to be located on the property in the vicinity of the new store and restaurant facilities . The U. S. Coast Guard has entered into a written agreement and the Planning Department has a copy on file . Attorney George Allen for the applicant explained the height of the light- 233 house which has a full -scale building of substantial construction, which was originally 100 feet and is now 84 feet, with ground elevation 20 feet lower . It is 200 feet from the freeway, and 1,200 feet from the mean high tide line of the ocean. There being no further appearances or written statements submitted for or against subject proposal; Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the recommendation of the Planning Commission, from request of Rancho Santa Barbara (Macco Corporation) (70- RZ - 74) to adopt an ordinance amending Section 581 of Article IV of Ordinance No . 661 of the County of Santa Barbara, as amended, Ordinance No . 1988, to allow for a Revised Development Plan to permit construction and use of a lighthouse 90 feet in height to be operated and maintained by the United States Coast Guard, and to be located approximately 110 feet north of the highway property line and approximately 90 feet southwesterly from the existing general store building be, and the same is hereby, confirmed. This lighthouse would replace the observation tower and museum approved by the Planning Commission on October 15, 1969 (69-CP-62), located approximately 400 feet northerly of the new proposed location. Said revision affects the following paragraphs of Section 581: 1) Paragraph (a) which pertains to the general arrangement of buildings, structures, parking, landscape areas, etc. 2) Paragraph (d) which pertains to uses of property. 3) Paragraph (f) which pertai n.s to exterior lighting. 4) Paragraph (h) which pertains to allowed height of buildings . It is ordered that the following ordinance be, and the same is hereby, adopted: In the Matter of Ordinance No . 2131 - An Ordinance Amending Ordi nance No 66'J_ of t he County of Santa Barbara, as Amended, by Amending Section 581 of Article IV of Said Ordinance. Upon the roll being called, the following Supervisors voted Aye, to-wit: George H. Clyde, Joe J . Callahan, Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell . NOES: None . ABSENT: None . ~------~----------------------------------------~-----~~------ - - 234 Amendment to Ord. 661 to Rezone Proper for Agric. Preserves/. November 2, 1970 In the Matter of Heari ng on Planning Commission and Agricultural Preserve y Advisory Committee Recommendati ons to Approve Requests for Adoption of an Ordinance . . Amending Article IV of Ordinance No . 661 to Rezone Property for Agricultural Preserves . Thi s being the date and time set for hearing on subject proposal ; the Affi- davit of Publication being on file wi th the Clerk; and there being no appearances or wri tten statements submitted for or against subject proposal; Upon moti on of Supervisor Tunnell, secopded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously , it is ordered that the Planni ng Commissi on and Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee recommendations to approve the following request s to amend Art icle IV of Ordinance No . 661 of the County of Sant a Barbara, as amended, to rezone properties Ordinance 213. - an Ord. amend g Ord. 661. I for agricult ural preserves be, and the same are hereby, confirmed, and t he Board passed and adopted the following ordinance : . . . 1 1) Airey Ranch in the Lompoc area from ' 1U11 Unclassi f i ed District to 100-AG, per Planning Commission Resolution No . 70-37 (70- RZ-17) . 1 2) Durley, Ainscough & McLanahan in t he Sant a Mari a Area from the 10-AG General Agricultural District to 40- AG , per Planning Commi ssion Resolution No . 70- 94 (70- RZ - 57) ;3) T. A. Cossa in the Santa Maria area from the ''U'' Unclassified District Classification to 40- AG , per Planning Commission Resolution No . 70- 94 (70- RZ- 62) . 4) Charles R. Henning in the Lompoc area from t he R-A-0 Suburban Agricultural-Residential District Classi f ication to 40-AG, per Planning Commiss i on Resoluti on No . 70 - 97 (70- RZ - 69) . In the Matter of Ordinance No . 2132 - An Ordinance Amending Ordinance No . 661 of the County of Santa Barbara, as Amended, by Adding Section 657 to Article IV of Said Ordinance Upon the roll being called, the following Supervisors voted Aye, to-wit: George H. Clyde, Joe J . Callahan, Daniel G. Grant, Francis H. Beattie, and Curtis Tunnell NOES: None. ABSENT: None Report on the Effect of Acr in Agric. Pre serves upon In ag~gricul. tur al the Matter of Report from County Assessor on the Effect of Acreage in Preserves upon the County Assessment Roll . the Co. Asses - ment Roll. . I The County Assessor submitted subject report, showing the total acreage within agricultural preserves equals 228,349 . Based on a 25% ratio , the assessed value on the assessment roll for such properties would be $16,963,250. 00. By going intq agricultural preserve ,and using economic value instead of market value , the total . . value drops from $6 7,853 , 000.00 t o $21 , 093,200 .00 . Als o~- the assessed value drops from $16,963, 250 . 00 to $5,273,300. 00 . The loss in assessed value equals $11,689,950. 00 . The above figure reflects a difference and' a loss on the assessment roll of property so far within the agricultural preserve . Recommendation on Requests to Fill Vacant Positions. I ' ' ' I 235 November 2, 1970 In the Matter of Reconnnendation of Administrative Officer on Requests t o Fill Vacant Positions. The Administrative Offic er submitted s ubj ect recommendation, dated Nov ember 2, 1970 , following the Board's adoption of an ordinance on October 26 , 1970 to adjust salari es effect ive Decemher1 & .i.1970; .and placing a freeze 0 1-i filling v acant positions. As a means of clarifying the order, it appears to be appropriate to also control the employment of extra hel p. Whenever a restriction is imposed on filling a regular position , it should also be provided that this pr9hibition applies to any extra help employment for that position or s pecialty. While anticipating adequate justification to fill positions which subsequently become vacant resulting from resignations or terminations, it is proposed to process the requests to fill positions in this category in the same manner as all other vacant positions. However, in order to f acilitate the administration of this l atter category, the Board may desire to authorize the Administrative Officer to approve filling positions which become v ac ant subsequent to this order . There were several positions which were in the process of being filled at the time the order was issued on October 26th. In these cases, the recruitment has been completed; and in some cases physical examinations had been completed. In others, connnitments had been made to the applicant . It is recommended that employ- ment be allowed in all of these c ases The following reconnnendations were submitted by the Administrative Officer for the Board to adopt an amended order: 1) Employment i n all positions vacant as of October 26th be restricte and that subsequent employment be allowed only upon specific authori zation of the .Board of Supervisors. 2) Extra help employment be similarly restricted and only approved 3) upon specific authorization of the Board of Supervisors Exceptions to No . 1 .be allowed for all positions wh~re the re- cruitment has been completed for the filling of positions which were vacant on October 26 . 4) Consider the possibility of authorizing the Administrative Officer to approve filling of positions , which become vacant subsequent to October 26 . ' Mr . Johnson distributed a list to the Board of classifications that have been i n the proces~ . ,. During the ensuing discussion on extra help, and emergenci.e s, it was suggested that the Administrative Officer be given the authority to control and employ extra help . Otherwise, if a position suddenly becomes vac ant and the department concerned has to wait for the next Board meeting, it might create problems . Chairman Clyde indicated he had reservations about the Board passing on every vacant position for extra help . Lt.' James Vizzolini of the Sheriff's Department made a presentation as Personnel Officer, and referred to a letter directed to the Administrative Officer last Wednesday about the critical problem arising about getting immediate extra help for juries that have to be sworn, and transportation. 236 November 2, 1970 Supervisor Grant agreed that authority should be vested in the Administrative Officer on hiring of extra help so County departments will not have to be delayed awaiting action at a Board meeting . Lt . Vizzolini referred to the letter sent to the Admjnistrative Officer requesting authorization for specific positions that have to have Board action today and have further positions that need clarification. The Administrative Officer also submitted a written report and recommendation, dated October 30, 1970, resulting from a request of the Sheriff-Coroner that three I specific positions be authorized, as well as a request to approve any and all vacancies in the following classifications: Deputy Sheriff Corrections Officer Senior Clerk Cook PBX Operator Intermediate Steno Clerk I . D. Technician I The Administrative Officer recommended authorization for the Sheriff to continue with uninterrupted recruitment of 11 vacant positions of Deputy Sheriff: one for the jail; one for the courts; one for the Identification Bureau; and three for the transportation detail . In addition, five are requested for the Isla Vista foot patrol Also recommended was that the position of Intermediate Steno Clerk (90 . 3380 . 06) for the Isla Vista foot patrol be authorized, along with the position of Sergeant (90 . 6480. 21) to be in charge of the foot patrol . Also submitted for authorization is a Typist Clerk position (90 . 7160. 11) which is required in the Sheriff' s office to cope with workload increases . Mr. Johnson further recommended that the Sheriff be given blanket authorization to recruit and fill all vacant positions in the Sheriff-Detention Facilities budget so that the occupancy and the security of the new jail will in no way be delayed or jeopardized Discussion ensued about not filling a vacant regular full-time position with extra help, and Mr . Johnson indicated he would accept the responsibility to control this . The County Counsel made a statement about the department head having the prerogative, according to the code, to fill permanent positions . This was in reference to having approved positions in the budget and the Board would want to review the position again at that time before filling . It would take an ordinance amendment to change the authority of the department head to fill those permanent positions . When there is a situation where the pos ition is filled and it becomes vacant, then to review thatEO~ition at that time would be contrary to the prerogative of the department head to have authority to fill positions . J . E. Lewis, County Clerk, pointed out the effect this freeze would have on extra help positions he has been filling for the November 3, 1970 General Election, which is mandatory. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that J . E. Lewis, County Clerk be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to employ extra help, as necessary, to conduct the forthcoming General Election, under State Law 237 November 2, 1970 Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the recommendation submitted by the Administrative Officer, as indicated in his letter to the Board dated October 30, 1970 be, and the same is hereby, confirmed, effective immediately. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the recommendations contained in the letter of November 2, 1970 di rected to the Board of Supetrvisors, as hereinabove-indicated, and amended be , and the same are hereby, confirmed, as follows, and by deletion of Recommendation #4 which will be given further consideration by the Board at a later time during the day: 1) Employment in all positions vacant as of October 26th be restricted and that subsequent employment be allowed only upon specific authorization of the Board of Supervisors . 2) Extra help employment be similarly restricted and only approved upon specific authorization of the Board of Supervisors, except in emergencies which, in the opinion of the Administrative Officer , should not be postponed until the following Monday, he may issue authorization for extra help from his office. 3) Exeptions to No . 1 be allowed for all positions where the recruitment has been completed for the filling of positions which were vacant on October 26, 1970. ********* The County Counsel reported that under the Government Code and the Constitution, this Board has the authority to make the rules and regulations and establish the compensation and number of employees . This has been accomplished in accordance with the salary ordinance and personnel ordinance that is involved in Section 27 of the County Code . The Board has already provided for the fixed positions, and it would take an ordinance to establish this ''freeze'' . George P. Kading, County Counsel, pointed out the existing regulation which provides that any position not filled for 30 days can be disallowed or revoked. Authorization can be given to the Admini strative Officer under existing rules and regulations but not the ordinance to "freeze'' . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie , and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Administrative Officer be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to closely monitor the matter of positions and the effect on the budget for the remainder of FY 1970-71; therefore, no action is to be taken now on t he fourth recommendation contained in the Administrative Officer ' s letter of November 2, 1970, authorizing him to approve filling of positions which become vacant subsequent to October 26, 1970 . Appeal of c. J. Loy r, In the Matter of Appeal of C. J. Loyer, Jr . from Planning Commission Jr. to Use a Traile en Property in Sant Approval of a Conditional Exception under Ordinance No . 661 to Use a Trailer on Ynez Valley frem Request for Pe-- t Property in Santa Ynez Valley from Request (70-V-56) for Conditional Exception to t Use Trailer a Permanent Dwelli g. Use Trailer as Permanent Dwelling. I -----------.,-------.-------------------------~----------~---- -.- - ------- ---- - - ----- - 238 November 2, 1970 Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that Monday, November 23, 1970, at 2 o'clock, p .m. be, and the same is hereby, set as the date and time for a public hearing on appe al of I C. J . Loyer, Jr. on reconmendation of the Planning Commission to approve a Conditional Exception under provisions of Section 4 of Article 10 and the 5-AG General Agricultural District Classification of Ordinance No . 661 to use a trailer for a period of 90 days, from request of C. J. Loyer, Jr . (70-V-56) to use trailer as a permanent dwelling on Assessor's Parcel No . 137- 010-30, generally located approximately 1,320 feet westerly of Ballard Canyon Road and 1.7 miles northerly of Chalk Hill Road, Santa Ynez Valley, and that notice be given by publication i n the Santa Barbara News-Press, a newspaper of general circulation, as follows, to-wit: Notice of Public Hearing on Appeal of C. J . Loyer, Jr. from Planning Commission Approval of a Conditional Exception under Ordinance No . 661 to Use a Trailer on Property in Santa Ynez Valley from Request (70-V-56) for Conditional Exception to Use Trailer as Permanent Dwelling . NOTICE is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California, on Monday, November 23, . 1970, at 2 o ' clock, p .m. , in the Board of Supervisors Hearing Room Fourth Floor, County Administration Building, City of Santa Barbara, State of California, on appeal of c. J . Loyer, Jr. from recommendation of the Planning Commission to approve a Conditional Exception under provisions of Section 4 of Article 10 and the 5-AG General Agricultural District Classification of Ordinance No. 661 to use a trailer for a period of 90 days, from request of C. J . Loyer, Jr . (70-V-56) to use trailer as a permanent dwelling on Assessor ' s Parcel No . 137-010-30, generally located approximately 1,320 feet westerly of Ballard Canyon Road and 1 . 7 miles northerly of Chalk Hill Road, Santa Ynez Valley . WITNESS my hand and seaL this 2nd day of November, 1970 J . E. LEWIS (SEAL) J . E. Lewis, County Clerk and Ex-Officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors It is further ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the Planning Commission for submission of a report . In the Matter of Hearings on Planning Commission and Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee Recommendations to Approve Applications to Create Agricultural Hearings to Approve Applicatiens t CJ;eate Agric. Prese~esPreserves in the Lompoc and Santa Maria Areas . in the Lompoc and Santa Mar a .Areas. . This being the date and time set for hearings on Planning Commission and 1 Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee recommendations to approve applicati ons on the following property owners to create agricultural preserves i n the Lompoc and Santa Maria areas; the Affidavit of Publication being on file with the Clerk; and there being no appearances or written statements submitted for or against subject proposal; November 2, 1970 1) Airey Ranch in Loqipoc area (70- AP- 6 ) " 2) Durley, Ainscough & McLanahan in Santa Maria Area (70-AP- 29) / 3) T. A. Cossa in Santa Maria Area (70-AP- 35) 1 4) Charles R. Henning in Lompoc Area (70- AP-43) 239 . I Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted creating the agricultural preserves for said property owners: RESOLUTION NQ . 70- 666 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) Executien ef Short In the Matter of Execution of Short Form Land Conservation Contracts for Form Land Conaervat Contracts fer Agric en Preserves. I ' ~ Approval of Minutes of Nov. 2, 19 0 Meeting. I Agricultural Preserves . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the following resolutions were passed and adopted authorizing the execution of subject contracts .: ATTEST: / Resolution No. 70 - 667 (Airey Ranch, Lompoc, 70-AP- 6 ,) , Resolution No . 70 - 668 (Durley, Ainscough & McLanahan i n Santa Mari a, 70 -AP- 29) /Resolution No . 70 - 669 (T . A. Cossa i n Santa Maria, 7o-AP-35) / Resolution No . 70 - 670 (Charles R. Henning in Lompoc area, 70 -AP-43) Upon motion the Board adjourned sine die, ' The foregoing Minutes are nereby approved . Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California, November 9, 1970, at 9:30 o ' clock, Present: Supervisors George H. Clyde, Daniel G. Grant, and Francis H. Beattie; and J . E. Lewis, Clerk Absent : Supervisors Joe J . ' Callahan and Curtis Tunnell Supervisor Clyde i n the Chair a .m. In the Matter of Approval of Minutes of November 2, 1970 Meeting. n Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the reading of the minutes of November 2, 1970 meeting be dispensed with, and approved, as submitted Z40 November 9, 1970 Plans ~ Spec In the Matter of Approval of Plans and Specifications for Stone Masonry Stone Masonr Walls, Missi n Walls, Mis~ion Canyon Fire Station No . 15, Foothill Rd . , Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara Canyon Fire Sta.15,S.B. County, California. I Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, secondedby Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the plans and specifications for Stone Masonry Walls, I Mission Canyon Fire Station No . 15, Foothill Rd. , Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara County, California be, and they are hereby, approved . It is further ordered that bids be received for said project on or before December 3, 1970, at 3 o ' clock, p .m. , and that the advertisement for bids be published t 1 in the Santa Barbara News-Press, a newspaper of general circulation, as follows, to-wit: for - NOTICE TO BIDDERS Notice is hereby given that the County of Santa Barbara will receive bids ''Stone Masonry Walls, Mission Canyon Fire Station No . 15, Foothill Rd. , Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara County, California'' Each bid will be in accordance with drawings and specifications approved by the Board of Supervisors and on file in the OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, COUNTY ENGINEERING BUILDING, 123 EAST ANAPAMU STREET, SANTA BARBARA, CALIFORNIA, WHERE THEY MAY BE EXAMINED AND COPIES SEeURED BY PROSPECTIVE BIDDERS . Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California (Amended by Statutes 1968, Chapter 699, Paragraph 1, operative July 1, 1969) the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara has directed the publishing of the prevailing rate of wages with a copy of the same being on file at the office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors . EACH BID SHALL BE MADE OUT ON A FORM TO BE OBTAINED AT THE OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS; shall be accompanied by a certified or cashier ' s check or bid bond for ten (10) percent of the amount of the bid, made payable to the order of the Treasurer of Santa Barbara County, Santa Barbara, California; shall be sealed and received in the Office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Santa Barbara County, County Administration Building, 105 East Anapamu Street, Santa Barbara, California, 93104, on or before 3:00 P.M. on the 3rd day of December, 1970, and will be opened and publicly read aloud at 3:00 P.M. of the day in the Board of Supervisors ' Conference Room located on the 4th floor of the Santa Barbara County Administration Building. The above mentioned check or bond shall be given as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the contract if awarded to him and will be declared forfeited if the successful bidder refuses to enter into said contract after being requested so to do by the Board of Supervisors of said County . The Board of Supervisors of Santa Barbara County reserves the right to .r eject any or all bids or waive any informality in a bid No bidder may withdraw his bid for a period of thirty (30) days after the date set for the opening thereof. Dated: November 9, 1970 J . E. LEWIS (SEAL) County Clerk Santa Barbara, California Guadalupe Union School District One Negotiable Bond. f Agreemt. bet. Co. State of Cal. re Topics Plan Goleta Area. I Agreemt. bet. Co. S.B. Flood Con. ~ Water Con.Dis.Sto, Drain,Lakeview Rd. I Grant Deed Consid. Robt.Armstrong Mob Sta.,Lakeview Rd. Orcutt Rd. 5th Dis / Change orders 1,2 Berry Construct.Co. Hollister Ave. ~ Storm Drain San Pedro Creek. 241 November 9, 1970 In the Matter of Issuance of One (1) Negotiable Note in the Amount of $50 , 000. 00, Guadalupe Union School District. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimou.sly, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO . 70-671 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Execution of Agreement between the County and State of California covering Financing of a TOPICS Plan for the Goleta Valley Area . Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant , and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO , 70-672 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Execution of Agreement between the County and Santa Barbara Flood Control and Water Conservation District for Construction of Storm Drain, Lakeview Road Job No . 5017 . 1 . Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: BRSQLUIION NQ . 70- 6Z3 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) It is further ordered that the above- entitled agreement be, and the same is hereby, referred to the Santa Barbara County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for execution. In the Matter of Acceptance of Grant Deed Without Monetary Consideration from Richard s. Armstrong, et ux, for Mobil Station Case No . 68-M- 92, Lakeview Road and Orcutt Road, Fifth Supervisorial District. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that a Grant Deed, dated December 12, 1969, from Richard I S. Armstrong and Lillian J. Armstrong, husband and "t'1ife, as joint tenants, for additional right of way on Lakeview Road and Orcutt Road, Fifth Supervisorial District, for development of a Mobil Service Station, be,and the same is hereby, accepted; and the Clerk be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to record said document in the office of the Santa Barbara County Recorder . In the Matter of Authorizing Chairman to Execute Change Orders Nos . 1, 2, and 3 to Contract with C. W. Berry Construction Co. for Hollister Avenue and Storm Drain from Gato Avenue to San Pedro Creek, Project No . 3010. 1. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman be , and he is hereby, authorized and directed to execute Change Orders Nos . 1, 2, and 3 to contract with C. W. Berry Con- struction Co . for Hollister Avenue and Storm Drain from Gato Avenue to San Pedro Creek, Project No . 3010.1 for total increase of $1,343 . 07 . ~ ~ - - - - -- - - - t 242 Releasing Ba lload Improv t. November 9, 1970 In the Matter of Releasing 15% Balance of Road Improvement Bond for Tracts Bond Tracts #10,529 #10,529 " -5 1. and //:10' 571 1358 . upon Expiration of One-Year Guarantee Period Required under Or- I dinance No . Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the 15% balance of the following road improvement bond for Tracts #10,529 and #10,571 be, and the same is hereby, released as to all future acts and conditions, as recommended by the Road Commissioner; the one- year guarantee period required under Ordinance No . 1358 having e~p~red: / Tract # 10,529 - Transamerica Insurance Company - R. A. Watt Company, Inc . , Principal , Bond No . 5240- 12- 73, dated March 25, 1968, in the amount of $57,200. 00 . / Tract# 10,571 - Letter of Credit, dated Sept. 6, 1967, from Gateway National Bank, 999 North Sepulveda Blvd. , El Segundo~ Calif. , O. Rey Rule, President, in the amount of ~65,000, as bond for road improvement . Release Open In the Matter of Release of Open Space Bond for Tract #10,851 in the Amount Space Bond Traat #10,85 of $2,500. 00. I Recomnend. o Co. Placemt. Aiches Dev. Plan, Goleta I Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant , and carried unanimously, i t is ordered that the following Open Space Bond for Tract #10,851, in the amount of $2,500. 00 be, and the same is hereby, released as to all future act s and conditions, as recommended by the County Landscape Architect : National Automobile and Casualty Insurance Co . - Ventura Savings & Loan Association and Midto'tm Development Co . , Principal, in the amount of $2, 500 . 00, Bond No . 224484, dated January 30, 1969. In the Matter of Recommendation of County Landscape Architect for Placement Bond of Bond for Landscaping and Cash Deposit for Maintenance of Street Trees for Aiches Development Plan, Office Buildings, Goleta Valley, Case No . 70-M- 88 . Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant , and carried unanimously , it i s order'ed that the recommendation of the County Landscape Archi tect for the placement of a bond, in the amount of $6,000.00 for landscaping, and a cash deposit in the amount of $120. 00 for maintenance of eight (8) street trees for Aiches Development Plan, Office Buildi ngs, Goleta Valley be, and the same is hereby, confirmed . The bond should contain wording similar to t he following: "In consideration of approval by the County Planning Commission of a Precise Plan of development (Case No . 70-M- 88) for an office facility at Patterson Avenue on Hollister Avenue, being a portion of Assessor ' s Parcel No . 65- 050- 26 Dr . Eugene Ai ches hereby agrees to install landscapi ng within one year from the date of issuance of the building permit for the Co.Recomnend. ~'l!rees Tract #11,005. I Release of All Co. claims for Damages to Co. roperty .Resulting From Vehicular Accident I Releasing Director Dept. Resources - Collections from Further Accountabi for Collection of Certain Delinqu Accts., S.B.Gen Hospital. I Ref. of Santa Mari Council Res. #3076 Renaming Thornburg St. I ' November 9, 1970 office facility; i n accordance with the appropri ate landscape plan on file with the County Landscape Architect . '' In the Matter of Recommendation of County Landscape Architect for Placement of Street Tree Planting Bond and Cash Deposit for Maintenance of Street Trees for Tract f/:11 , 005 . Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the recommendation of the County Landscape Architect for placement of a street tree planting bond in the amount of $142 .50 for Tract #11,005, and a cash deposit of $285 .00 for maintenance of nineteen (19) street trees for Tract #11,005 be, and the same is hereby, confirmed . The bond should contain wordi ng similar to the following: "In consideration of approval by the County Planning Commission of a Precise Plan of development (Tract #11,005) Mr. D. Stewart Kerr hereby agrees to plant 19 trees, in accordance with the approved landscaping plan, on file with the County Landscape Architect.'' In the Matter of Execution of Release of All County Claims for Damages to County Property Resulting from Vehicular Accident, in the Amount of $222 . 87. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that t he Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute a Release of all County clajms for damages to County property resulting from a vehicular accident, as follows: Robert Quincy Grant, July 31, 1970, on Lompoc/Casmalia Road. 243 It is further ordered that the Director, Department of Resources & Collections be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to deposit the draft received in full settlement therefor to the Road Fund. In the Matter of Releasing Director, Department of Resources & Collections from Further Accountability for Collection of Certain Delinquent Accounts ; Santa ity Barbara General Hospital . nt Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, this Board hereby determines that the following amounts are too small to justify the cost of collection, or that the collection of such amounts is improbable for the reasons set forth in the verified applications of the Director, Department of Resources ~Collections, and it is ordered that the Director be, and . he is hereby, discharged from further accountability for the collection of the following amounts, in accordance with Section 25257 of the Welfare & Institutions Code: (SEE LIST ON PAGE 244) In the Matter of Referral of Santa Maria City Council Resolution No . 3076, renaming Thornburg Stre~t, running north from West Donovan Road to West Creston Street, to Pine Street; and Resolution No . 3077, renaming Central Street between East Ave. and Concepcion Ave., to Central Avenue, to Planning Department. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and ca~: ~ ried unanimously, it is ordered that the above- entitled Santa Maria City Council Resolutions be, and they are hereby, referred to the Planning Department, and then placed on file . 244 , _ __ '_~~~---~SANTA 8ARBARA~~~~~~,------~-~INDIGENT ACCOUNTS OELETEO FROM MASTERFILE GENERAL HOSPITAL MONTH cNOING Od/31/70 PAG~ l __ PATIENT NAME f'IRNO ___ ____,_-'P- AYCOOE S )_ __~ LAST 6 lll ING_~ ACCT .BALANCE DEt.eTEO ___ ~ - ABRAMS,HARRY OENNIS 02 92 14 2 60 01/31/70 212.00 AGUILERA,fREOERICK 02 60 45 1 02/28/70 --~~~~--~~-AGUllEf!A_~SYLVIA ROSALE AGUIRRE,OAVIO JR. 03 08 11 2~-60~~~--~ - 01/31/70 10.50 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 oo 9a 32 2 ALtsERS,GARY E. 03 09 46 z ALLIANO,PHl=l=l~l ~P -~~----~~---~--"-02 59 37 2 ANTONIO,OAVIO 01 95 72 2 ARO, CAROL 01 96 82 2 SAKER,OIANE V. 02 62 71 2 SALbOA,MARIA 03 04 51 2 BALLARO ,CHRISTINE 01 18 30 2 ~~~~~~-~~-BA LTRAHAlTlS~BE~T~TY-'------~--~-02 28 46 2 BALTRAHAlTIS ,JOHN C. 02 32 70 2 BANALES,PRICILLA 03 02 51 2 --' _ ----~~---,.~ BANKS 1. GARRE TT Wl LL l -"A--'"'M--''--______0 2 12 7.~2.,_, SANKS , RONA LO BER AL DO , JAMES BES EC KER, ALEX I $'---~------- .__ BlROSELLr MART IN JR 02 88 08 2 01 20 14 2 03 09 61 2 02 82 9 1 2 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 _.60._~~ ___,--- 60 60 - 60 60 02/28/70 02/28/70 02/26/70 01/31/70 02/28/70 63.~0 46.30 24.30 34.50 06/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70~--- 08/31/70 08/31/70 ' ~--r1--1"--9_.;;,_,4._0;___.~__oe13111 o_____,_ __ 02/28/70 02/28/70 02/28/70 02/28/70 ____ _ o 11311~1~0~~~-- 02128110 02128110 02/28/70 02128110 10.00 08/31/70 24.20 08/31/70 45.05 08/31/70 17.75 08/31/70 08/31/70 69.8.50.-~__08/31/70 470.25 53.20 37.00 08/31/70 08/Jl/70 17.25 -----08/31/70 41.70 08/31/70 -- 8LAIRrCONNIE BLAIR,H ICHAEL ~---- 02/28/70 ~~0=3'--1=~4~7~3~2,___~6~0~~----~~~'--~-02/ 8/70 03 14 74 2 60 28.00 35. 00 32.00 08/31/70 08/31/70 BLANCHARO ,HENRY CLIFTON 03 12 06 2 BONNELL,STELLA 02 36 65 l -~---~~--~~--60WLIN G 1. RE8ECCA ANN~~---~-~--02 40 25 2 GRAZ rJOSEPH 03 10 40 2 ~ 60 lt &o 30 bd ~ ~-- 60 ~--- 02/28/70 08/31/70 02/28/70 83. 70 08/31/70 ~~-02 / 2 8/ 70_ _____~ 7_4~ ~1~5__~-----'08 / 31 /70~--- 02/28/ 70 14.50 08/31/70 2,763.85 - - - ----------~- ' SANTA BARBARA GENERAL HOSPITAL - ~------l NOlGENT ACCOUNTS OELETEO FROM MASTERFILE __ MONTH ENDING 08/31/70 PATIENT NAME MRN.Q. ___ PAYCOOECS) LAST 61LLING BROUGH,WILLIAM LAWRENCt 01 80 99 2 - 6ROWN,RUSSELL 01 42 94 2 60 01/31/70 02/28/70 ACCT.BALANCE 10.00 12.40 ----~~-------~BU~~RN~E"-.T!:.T.!., GEORGE.M~~ .-~_,______,.__ ___0 3 10 7 5 2_-= 60 ----~---02/28/70~~----~~--17.00 8USH,OLIVER F. CABRERA,OORA E. 00 57 70 2 01 28 6 7 2 __C A8RER~RAH1RO R. ____ ,_ _~ Ol._58 76 2 CAMARG0,6ERTHA O. 02 12 03 2 CAMPOS,OAN1EL E. CAREY t JOHN~----.,--.,,-------~~ CARL t SLE, STUART CAUOlllOrMARlNA 03 06 62 2 00 68 ~ 2 01 08 10 2 01 85 51 2 CHABQOTTJ)ONNA__ __ __,__~~~~03 L3 72 2 CHAMPIEUX,CHRlSTY 03 03 68 2 CHAMPLIN,PAUL C. 03 11 It l 2 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 02/28/70 02/28/70 02/28/70 01/31/70 02/28/70 01/31/70 02128110 02/28/70 58. 55 167.73 24.05 94.55 ------~~-'8. 5 0 5.50 70.40 ~~~~02/ZS/70~-~~~~~8~~5~0~-- 02/28/70 .15 02128110 l l. 75 OELE!_EO ___ _ 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 --- 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/3 l .l70 08/31/70 08/31/70 C.L EGG.J} lll Y PI ERCE _ __ _~ --~_.,02 7Llt_Q. l _ ___, 60 02.{28110 -----~. 9. -_q 3. 60 _ ,08/31 /70 ____ COLEMAN ,JlMMlE MACK 02 30 97 2 COLL INS,RAY 03 10 99 2 02. 74 51 1 ' . CONWAY,SPENCER ALLAN 03 06 39 2 COOK,RONALO 02 43 68 2 60 ~ 60 60 60 02/28/70 5.50 08/31/70 02128110 -~_, __ __.__ 04128110 01/31/70 02/ll/69 19.25 ,_ _ ,l, 753. 35~- 11. 75 5.50 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 -------=----~--CORDERO MARlA ___~ -,---- --'01~70 20 ~2~_ (,~(} --~-~-.,_~0212 8=/_,7:0.:-~.,- 08/31 /70 ___.__ _ CORRICK , Wl LLIAH F. COTE,LETTY MARSHA ----~~-~-~---=C=O~T ~TE=-N~~OBERT H~~__~~COWANtOOROTHY 03 09 57 2 03 11 38 2 --- 02 76 56 2 01 33 55 1 60 60 __ 60 ~ 60 02128110 02/28/70 01/31/70 02/28/70 30.90 50.85 40.00 7,166.33 -- 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 I I ___ - ----- SANTA BARBARA INOIGcNT ACCOUNTS OELETEO FROM MASTERFILE GENERAL HOSP ITAL ~~---~- MONTH ENDING 08/31/70 ~ PATIENT NAHE __ ~~~~~.-~ HRNO PAVCOOEtS) ---=LAST 8 lll lNG 02128110 COXSEY,CVNTHlA Ol qo 75 2 CRAIG, JOHNNIE 03 08 12 2 60 02/28/70 ~----~---~ CRISPIN,ROSIN_~~~~----- 02 03 88 l~ ~~~------~-~~02/28/70 CROOKS,MARGARET 03 08 24 l 60 02/13/70 CROSS,BARBARA ANN 60 02128110 PAGE 3 ACCT .BALANCE_~ OELE TE00--~- 61. 75 19.70 08/31/70 08/31/70 ~~-9-85.60----'08/31/70 437.60 08/3l/70 CUNNINGHAM HUGH ------~ DALTON,JAMES V. 03 14 09 2 02 91 24 2 03 05 72 2 60 60 02/28/70 __ ,._._._ 02/28/70 24.20 a.so 62.20 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 DANNER, MICHAEL L. ~ ~o 02/28/70 .l.03.90 OANNER, RICHARD~-~-~--~- 01 20 28 _l~_ yf' ~0 - 01 28 49 2 02/28/70 2.07.75 08/31/70 OU/31170 OANNER,JULIE 00 57 44 2 " &?! 02/28/70 22.75 08/31/70 OE LA ROSA,JAIME 02 87 25 l ~ ~tJ 1,384. so 08/31/70 OE LA VEGA CARLOS ~~-~~---- 0 l 9 3 2 5 .=1- .---'------~ ~t J 02128110 ~-~~----02/28/70_~~ 2, 733. 80 ~~08/31/,~7~0:----~! OlEPENBROCKrGEORGE J. DILLON,SHERRl -' --.-~-------_,._.O_!l.M.ING~EZ~ JOE_Z . ~-~~~,_ OORAN,JOEL OOTHEE,AL8ERT 03 11 81 1 03 11 83 2 -- 02 13_ 80 l __ 03 11 88 l 03 09 31 l 60 60 60 60 ______ ___ __ OR AKE THAOUS F ---------~---- 02 44 96'-"'--- 60 ORT lNA,60 02 33 04 1 - OU BROCK,CHARLES 01 88 41 2 60 03 04 81 2 60 OUNOEEtSABASTIAN K.JR. 03 12 94 2 60 . ECHOLS,WENOELL RAY 03 09 25 1 60 -------------,E~D~wAR OS "cc_.H__A . ~E.__A'-'-=.-------- - 02 24 40 2 EGGERMONT,ROBERT J. 02 96 23 2 60 02./27/70 358.95 02/28/70 10.50 ~~,--02/28/70 _ ~--- 555.25 -- 21.90 618.80 ------"'"3' ' 8 2 2. 90 14.60 48.30 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 ! 02/28/70 02/2.8/70 02/28/70 02/28/70 02/28/70 01/31/70 ~~--~ ~-~--~8~.5_0~_,._ _08 '/-31/70__--.___,_, 02128170 a.so 08/31 /70 02/13/70 113.20 08/31 /70 -~ ~-- 02/28/70,___~ __ 78.2.0 _ 08/31/70 01/31/70 75.95 08/31 /70 18,954.13 -------- ----__ __ SANTA SARBARA __ GENERAL HOSPITAL ~-----INDIGENT ACCOUNTS DELETED FROM MASTERF ILE=-.-~~---.'--MONTH ENDING 08/31/70 __P AGE: _ 4_ ______ PATIENT NAME _________ MRNO_~- PAYCOOE(SJ LAST BILLING ACCT .BALANCE OELEfEO __ _ ELLIOTT,ALEX GEORGE 03 14 24 2 60 02/28/70 24. 80 08/31/70 ESPARZA,MIGUEL 02 31 87 2 02/28/70 ll.75 ----------~ESPOSITO,OONALO J_~R.~. __-~--------'02 54 9 2_~ -----~0=2128110 ____ 65.95 08/31/70 08/31/70 FAGAN,HlCHAEL FARRELL1EOWARO ._~-~-~---~FATOLA,STEPHEN c. FEHR,CHRISTINE Y. fERNANOElrSAllY 02 17 71 2. 02 70 32 1 03 12 54 l 02 90 11 2. 02 61 64 2 60 60 60 60 F lELO,ANNE E . -~.----~--f IELD, TOOO 26 10 6tJ ~~ flEHING,PATRICK OAVlO 03 09 33 l 02 40 71 1 bO ------~~---FLORES,.NJCK S----~---. ~-0 83 8-9=----~60_ _~ ---- - FLORES,RANOOLPH 03 14 01 l - FOXENtGARY J. - -------,__FRAZIER, OA V 0 H-----~~-~ GALLAGHfR,CATHERINE GARCIA,JOSE V. 00 62 39 l 03 11 5 2 03 11 01 2 ------~~-.-~---------'G~A~~RO.J;LARA A. 02 39 42 2 .~-------,------- 02 08 5 7_ 1.--. GARZA,OA . lAN L. 02 13 15 2 - - GARZA,MAGOALANA 02 07 53 2 60 60 60 ~ 0t ?j" 6 0 ___,____,,_____ y!?CJ 02/28/70 02/28/70 02./28/70- 02/28/70 02/28/70 11.00 ltlOl.95 21. 75 18.50 21.00 08/31/70 08/31/70 ,----,._~0=--8=---/-=3 l / 7 0 08/31/70 08/31/70 .40 08/31/70 -- --""' 02/28/70 ~- ----~ --- 02128110 02128110 _ OU28110 02/28/70 02/28/70 l,292.80 ---~-_,_43._6_0~ 187.70 656.10 08/31/70 08/31/70 ~08/3J/ ~70"'---__ _ 08/31/70 08/31/70 o2 12 8110 -~~~ -~--'1t.-o.=_.co. -6'"=5----.--~aa13111 o--~- o 212a11 o 15.65 oa131110 02/28/70 llt.00 08/31/70 ~ 02/26/70~_._____,_.,.~-4~7~~3~~0~~~~08/3l/70 02/28/70 22.65 08/31/70 02/28/70 17.55 GARZA,RUTH~~---~~--~-----~0~1~76 80 2 ye ~(} y{ GO y{ f?O - -----~- 0212 8/ 70__,_'-----T---. 27.25 08/31/70 08/31/70 GELMAN,CARMEN 02 76 07 2 02/28/70 e.so 08/31/70 GEL TZ,JOHN J. 03 13 64 2 60 02128110 8.50 08/31/70 '"------.---~--_,_.GlBSON,JOHN _____ ~-~~~~ 00 82 90 l_~_oo __ _ 02/28/70 21437.15 08/31/70 GILLILAN,ARflE ROBERT 02 66 68 l 02/28/70 50.30 06/31/70 26,552.58 . . - I -- - - ----~~----~~SANTA BARBARA GENERAL HOSPITAL ------~~ PATIENT NAME GOHEZ , GONlAl.O J. INDIGENT ACCOUNTS DELETED FROM MASTERFILE MONTH ENDING 08/31/70 MRN=0-~ 02 23 11 l PAYCOOEC S) lo 4t tl - &o LAST BllLING 02128110 - PAGE 5 ACCT. BAlANC:;.E:=:- 40. 00 OE LE TEO 08/31/70 GONZALEl ,VICTOR 03 10 67 2 60 02/28/70 31t.80 08/31/70 GROVE, HER Yl. _ ~_.___ _____ 03 05 82 1-~-=6'-0=~~---,.---~~~-=02/ 2 8/70 ____2 83. 5~5~~~08/3 l / 70_~-- GUTIERREl,JIMHY JR. 03 00 56 2 60 0\/31/70 34.50 08/ ll /70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/3l/70 08/31/70 HALL,WlllIAH J. --,,.~~~-~- __ HA_LLEN6ECK1MARVELLE HAMPTON,MIKE HEAGNEY,WILL(AM J. ~~~.-~H~E=A~T~Oc.N.,M.KATH=R~YN:.:-_ _.__.~_ HENTON,CLORA HERNANOEZ,TONY MERCEL _HERRERA~UTH MARIE HOOGE AGNES IRENE HOFFMAN,W1LLIAM o. 01 64 29 2 ~~--~--=-02 21 69 1 03 13 92 2 60 - 00 93 88 l 60 03 04 16 2 60 02 32 94 l 60 03 04 38 2 01 28 10 l _-.-- 60 00 81 62 l 01 73 97 l ~ bO -?' 60 . ----'-----~~ -'-H'-'OL HAN r SCOT~T.__ ____~ ____0 3 10 L.!!l.'.- l __ 60 HOWETH,NOREEN R. 02 84 80 2 HUERTA,SALVAOOR 01 53 16 2 60 ~--~-----.--~_ JACKSON, ALVIN s.,_ __ ~.,----- 02 87 77 1 _ 26 .ffe 11 (po JA~tS ON , DICK JACKSON,LONlO 03 11 15 2 - 03 12 12 2 60 60 02/28/70 7.80 02/28/70 846.25 ~--- 02/28/70 02128110 02/28/70 ~~ 01/31/70 02/28/70 _Oc2 / 2 8110 02/28/70 02128110 0212.81__1,_,0_ _ ____,_,,_ 02/28/70 02/28/70 02/Z_8/70 02128110 02/28/70 21.00 1,404.75 90.00 200.80 _ __ 0,_8_/.~3, l / 7 0 ------- __._._ 08/31/70 23.00 08/31/70 __2 23e~5.-_:5cc~-- 08/31 /70 --'---- 40. 00 08/31/70 40.00 08/31/70 __ 21.itS 08/;31/10 __ ~- 69. 75 11.75 _ __.__5.50 -- 17.50 08/31/70 08/31/70 o a 1J111 o_._.,._._~- o a 1J1110 08/31/70 --~--~~~~__JA~USKA,JOSEPH O. 03 00 5 3 2 __- -6=-=0- ~- ---~- 02/28/70 10.00 -----22. 2"_5._~~- 16. 5~ 08/31/70~~-- JAURECU I , MARY JOHNS MARGARET ~----,.-.~----~---.:J~O~HNSON,ANGEL~l=N=A:_~-~~~-~~JOHNSON, RUTH 01 46 36 2 02 04 34 l 02 48 12 2 01 66 02 2 60 26 lO ~O '}ti &o Y1 ~o 01/31/70 02/28/70 11. 70 02128110~~~~----, 15.2~0- 02/28/70 140.45 30,184.68 08/31/70 08/31/70 08 /31,~/7:=0 ____ _, 08/31/70 - - - - SANTA BARBARA GENERAL HOSP ITAL INDIGENT ACCOUNTS OELETEO FROM MASTERf lLE MONTH ENDING 08/31/70 .-----.,__.-----~~----_,. ___P~ ATIENT NA,M_E.,_._.__, __.__._~_.___ __ . .N O PAYCOOEC S_,t ___~ l-A.ST BIL ING JONES,PAMELA LOU JUSERA,RENE KAHN MANUEL_ V IN_.=C=E~N-=T--- _______ KEATING,JANE C. KEENAN,RONALO KEENER,JO ANN __ ~-~~--"-1------~ KlNGSLEY,CHARLES F. KRUSE,EOWIN LA PRAIM,JACK WESTf;RN ~~--- LANE,JILL LEYVA,HAYOEE 02 84 77 2 01 37 11 2 02 64 6 2 -- 03 08 79 2 02 79 28 l 02 67 62 2 01 88 26 l 03 11 17 2 03 10 81 l 03 13 39 2 60 60 60 60 ~1 ie iPo 60 60 60 02/28/70 02/28/70 02/28/70 02128110 02/28/70 02/28/70 02/2,8110 - 02/28/70 0212011"0""'_ 02128110 02 99 22 2 60 02/28/70 ACCT.BALANCE 53.55 16.50 a.so 750.55 34.85 1,121.os 62.20 -8-5.70 a. 50 40.20 ~-PAGE 6 __ ,__ _ DELETED __ _ 08/31/70 08/31/70 0 8 / 31_1:__7:_0=--- 08/3 l /70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31170 oa 131-1=-_1;_ a~-'"-'-- 08/31/70 08/31/70 ---~~-------l lESER"1ANtSONORA G.'-~~----_,03 08 1_3 2 ______60._ _~ ---+-'----- 02/28 70_ _~ ~ ~_,__._9_=6-'5=------- 08/ll/70_ 08/31/70 08/31/70 l lNOLEYtHAROLO JAMES 03 11 48 l LIPKE,LINOA ANN 02 92 20 2 -' .----~-------LOUS TAL.OT _. JEAN ___~ ~-~--0 l l 9 .il. 1._ LOY,MARVEL HENRY 03 07 53 l LOZANO,NATHAN 00 86 89 1 --------~ __l UNO IN V-E="R"".A:o__,_,. _____~ ---- 02 32 71 2 MAC OONALO,LEON H. 02 93 08 1 MAClAS,jESS 00 57 17 l 60 60 60 60 _ _.60~---- c6 ~1 10 ~o 3t ia ~o 02128110 02/28/70 OZ/28/ 7.Jl 02121110 02/28/70 02/28/70 ~- ~---~~~---M~A~O~O~O~X,MICHAEL---:H~:------~-~-~---=0.:3 05 ~8~3.-:11.-.-_-b=O 02/26/70 02/28/70 02/28/70 MANNY,HELEN 02 89 83 1 60 02128110 MANSER, JOHN R. 02 73 78 2 60 02/28/70 ~--~-----. .~~M~ANZO~J =s.-_~~---__~~ ~~-03 08 60 2 60 _______ ~.~ . 02/ 8/70 MANZO,SOLEOAO 03 07 13 2 60 02128110 494.45 28.25 _____ 3 z. zs :~--.-'o a1 311_1;:"'.o ___ 2,108.45 544.05 38.05 10.00 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 l,672.30 08/31/70 ~~~~776.4_5~~~08/31/70~~-- l t 890. 80 307.65 ~34.35 08/31/70 08/31/70 -~08/31/J_O. ___ _ 08/31/70 ., - - - ---------~ SANT A BARBARA --~- GENERAL HOSP 1 fAL ---____._____~__._-~ PATIENT NAME MARCELLA,W.SRAOFORD HARSHAL L,JAHES w. MC CORMACK, MILOREO MC OONALO,TRUE E. -~-:--~--~------___,. MC GEOUGH C AR LES MC KENNON,LARRY C. MC MAHON,DONALO MC HONIGLE,JOHN W. INDIGENT ACCOUNTS OELETtO FROM MASTERfllE MONTH ENDING 08/31/70 MRNO ______ PAYCOOE S) 03 08 99 2 60 03 14 91 2 60 01 q1 90 2 60 01 82 46 l Ol 30 44 2 60 03 13 73 2. 03 11 37 2 60 02 06 66 1 60 ---~- 03 11 80 2 02 53 04 2 - 60 MEOINA,JOSE ANGEL 60 PAGE: 1 LAST 6ILLING ~~ ACCT .SALANCE __ O_ELETEO:.-._____ 02/28/70 02/28/70 01/31/70 ---~ 02/ 28/70 02/28/70 02/28/70 02/28/70 02/13/70 02/28/70 02/28/70 13.20 08/31/70 l~.50 15.50 1,044.10 22.10 61.40 70.50 813.50 15. 55 115.70 08/31/70 - 08/31/70 ~-- 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/10 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 MEOlNArSTEVEN 02 53 05 2 60 02/28/70 116.60 08/31/70 08/3!/70 HELCHER.rLEO J. MELO, HORTENCIA ---------~-~~--"0~3c._._1.=3 34 l __- 6=0- ._ __ _______0 .2/27/70~~-~~-212.50 03 06 76 2 60 r MENDOZA , SAN.ORA 02 01 20 2 - ----~~-----H".'.ILHOAN, HlCHELLE_ O~~~-----~~--~ Ol 98~45 ~ _ 60. _ _ MI LLER,ANNE 03 07 63 2 60 - MILLStOORIS 02 41 85 l 60 '------------!!. MOORE,GEORGE H------~~----. 00 83 97 2__._~ 60 MORA , ROBERT L. 02 44 08 2 60 MORELOS,CATHLEEN 01 11 9-1 2 - 60 --------~-MORROW ROBERT E-.,------~----'02 69 33 2 HOYtR,JOHN WRIGHT 02 86 97 2 MULHERN,JOHN - ~ 60 1,2 io Po 60 02/28/70 64.15 01/31/70 16.00 - OZ/~8110 ___ _ 66.50 __ 02/28/70 9.65 - 02/2.8/70 Ol/31/L0_,.,_ __- -=9-~6~ 0~~5-~ 02/28/70 334.93 02/28/70 170.00 02/28/7~0~--~~-=1=3~ ~1~5 ~~ 02128110 18.10 02128110 21.50 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/3l/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 03 ll 76 2 ____ __.,.~----~H~UNOZ,RE~H~O~N~0~0~--~~~~-,.~-~02 10 3 2 60,_,_ _______ _ 01/3 /_70 20. 8 5 __ _,,.-0=-8 /3 l /70 ____ . MUSACCHIA rlEN CHRISTOPHER 02 60 50 1 60 02/28/70 76.80 08/31/70 ----------~----- 't9,331.31 --- -~---.~- SANTA BARBARA INDIGENT ACCOUNTS DELETED FROM MASTERFILE MONTH ENOING 08/ll/70 PAGE 6 ' ~ GENERAL HOSPITAL OELE_Tf:O 08/31/70 08/31/70 PATIENT NAME __ NEVARfltMARIA LUISA 02 66 99 2 NUNEZ,JOSE 02 40 43 2 -~PAYCOOE S) -~~_.=LcAr,ST BILL ING,.__ ---A'-CC T. aALANCE 60 60 02/28/ 70 02/28/70 416.55 55.35 ------.___._.,._._____,. _N UNEZ, MAR l =A-------------O=3 _ 05 04 ~---6=:.0._ __ ,___ __ -~ 02/ 2 8/ 70_______.,.,.__-~ _:;5;1.:.3=.5;_ _ 0 8 / 3 l /70 ___ 0'NEllL,6AR8ARA A. OLOS,PATRICK C. OWNSBV1 80NNIE E~~~~~~~~~ PAGALtNG, GEORGE PALATO,TONY JR. PAZ JOSEFINA PERON,FRANK JOE 03 06 40 2 03 04 85 1 03 13 08 2 00 81 30 2 - 03 01 42 1 02 41 68 2 03 12 91 2 60 02/28/70 60 01/16/70 ~6_0 ___ ~-~~ 02/28/70 60 60 60 ~_.,.~~----~- 60 01/31/70 02/20/70 02128110' -------- 02128110 29.60 08/31/70 - 110.50 08/31/70 08/31 /70 ___ _ 55.77 699.70 434.65 23.30 PETERS,JOHN B. 02 47 86 l .;.__ _ .,___.,.__;~--~-'-'-,P-ETERSON,ROY G. 60 02./28/70 ~-6=0~~~~---'-~~~-02/48/70 61900.35 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31170 08/31/70 08/31/70 14. 2=5~ ~~0~8, / 3 l /.1.0 __ _ PITTS,MlCHAEL JAMES ' PITTS,kICHARO N. _ _,____~--~~~POAGE,MlCH fl J. POOLE,JERRllYN POPE,MARTY 02 61 11 1 ~~-_._~-~--02_63 89 l _ 03 11 14 2 02 83 37 2 60 60 60 60 ___ __,___.,._., _ __,__ __. POUCHE T t THOMAS J .___~-~-.~ --~ .~:!.4.3 2 03 11 05 2 _ 60 PRUITT,RICl.LANO 60 RtASNER, LARRY w. 01 80 55 z 01/31/70 02/21/70 24.25 81.75 -----~~0212 811:=0 ~--- ____ .,____ 5 91. 00 0212.8110 17.05 08/31/70 -~--'""---.-.- 08/31/70 0 al 31 / .iO=-__ ____, 08/31/70 02128110 47.05 08/31/70 _------- oz 12a11o~--,-"--~.,-o,-.,_____8.~ ~Ls~_o. ___o a11111 o ---- 02128110 14.75 08/31/70 02/28/70 13.30 08/31/70 ---.--~~--~R=E=E-VES~LOVE~R~~~~~--~--~0~3~11~87 2~-~6~0"-.c.,_~--.-~~~ 02128110 ~-~~~~2=3=~0~5:.~~ 0 8 /) l ./!-7.!.% ___ I REGlH8AL,GERALO REILLEY,CHARLES J. ---.----~~---'CRE l SMAN t C tif_R Yl RtSNIK,PHllllP -----~---- ~~ 02 97 73 2 03 12 49 2 60 60 03 08 83 l oO 02/28/70 02/28/70 02128110 02/20/70 8.50 32.10 ~----165. 70 -- 200.30 59,392.28 08/31/70 08/31/70 0 8 / 3 l / 7 O .____.~,, 08/31/70 \ ., ___ - - -----.-- SANTA BARBARA ' ~ENERAL HOSPITAL REVELLl ,RlCHARO R. ROBBINS,LINDA L. \ INDIGENT ACCOUNTS DELETED FROM MASTERFILE MONTH ENOlNG 08/31/70 MRNO PAYCOOECS) LAST BllllNG ACCT.BALANCE ___,_.__._____,__---,---.- -~- 03 10 53 2 60 02/28/70 14.75 03 14 11 2 60 02/28/70 53.05 PAGE 9 __ _ - DE LE TEO 08/31/70 08/31 /70 ROBERTS,GARY _~~---------=-03 15 02 2 _ JI\ &-tJ -------- Ol/28110_~~- ~- 8. 50 -~-08/31 /70'------- ROBLES ,JOSEPHINE L. ROORIGUEZ,ANA MARIA 03 04 39 2 60 - 02 97 27 2 ROORIGUEZrANA MAR ~lE=----~------~~~02 09 04 2 ROOR(GUEZ rlRENE ROOR IQUEZtSOLIOAO 03 06 69 2 02 92 13 2 60 60 60 60 02/28/ 70 02/28/70 01/31/70 01/31/70 02128110 27.55 598.25 85 a.so 35.35 ROMO ,ALMA ROSA -------~~01 58 91~2-~_6_0~-~~~-~.~~-,~--~ 02/28/70 63.20 ROMO , ERNESTO 01 58 89 2 60 ROMO ,MARGARITA MARIA 01 58 93 2 60 --~----"-- -------~R=ONOAN-G!l_ME z_, MI GUE l ________ 03_ 0 84 l. 60 ROUNOHEAO ,LEROY 03 08 10 2 60 1 ~--- ROVETTl,BRUNU LOUIS 03 05 32 2 60 . ---,-------- RUTHERFORO ,OENNlS H. ~~~--~ 03 13_ 0.___. - 60 RUZICKA ,SHERRY KAY 02 78 37 l 60 SALEM,fREOA - 02 11 60 2 60 _ ________ ,__SAUCEOQ, M CKE SCHOFlELO ,G EORGE c. SCHWAR TZ,FLORENCE E. 01 99 8.9 l _,___ 02 69 48 l 60 -- 03 14 31 2 60 0 03 37 2 ~-60. ___ _ SEIFERLlNG, GARY 02 71 10 1 60 SERANO,PATRICIA 03 10 80 l 60 '---------~--SHAFER,O_A~L=E_A--'-.--~-~~~~-----0=3 14 17 2 SHEPPARO,JAMES W. 02 34 31 l 11~-------~~--- 02/28/70 02/28/70 02/ 8/70 02/28/70 01/31/70 02/28/70 ______ _ OZ/28110 02/28/70 02/2e/70 _ _ 02/28/70 02/28/70 41.15 24.85 29.55 23.00 28.00 511.10 38.00 911.90 7.65 02128110 ----809.87 02128110 02120110 02/28/ 70 _ __._. 02/28/70 646.25 !00. 85 40.00 - 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 oa131110 __ 0_8_/_31 /70_~_ 08/31/70 08/31/70 _ 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 -~08/31/70 08/31/70 - -- - ------ SANTA BARBARA ' GENtRAL HOSPITAL _ lNOlGENT ACCOUNTS DELETED FROM MASTERF llE ~---~~~~MONTH ENOlNG 08/31/70 PAGE 10 -- PATIENT NAME MRNO PAYCOOE&S LAST BILLING ACCT.BALANCE 11.20 OELETEO ___ ~: SILGUERO.VIRGINIA SIMPSON,GEORGE e. --:-----~----SLYOER,PATRICIA BLAINE SMITH,JACQUELYN KAVE SMITH,KENT WHITEMAN STEINWANO,JOHN STEPHENS,fREO - STRANGE,SHARON STREET,VERN w. SUAREZ1STEVEN A. 01 99 63 2 02 lt2 17 l ----'-~----=02 71 99 2 02 95 92 2 02 80 52 1 02 53 37 l 03 03 01 l 03 10 58 2 03 08 b8 2 02 66 46 2 --~TE.f RT I LL ER t RO_Y._.--W=,. _~_ ______0 3_0.~._, TEGTHEVER,HARGARET 02 96 93 2 --~-----~----~~ THOMAS , PATRICK W. 00 61 17 1 THOMAS MICHAEL __ ~~~~-.,,---~~~0~0~61_16 2 03 08 74 2 60 60 -~ (pc; 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 - 60 60 TlffT,HAROLD MARIS 02 28 35 1 60 -----~---_TOGNAlZINl,RICHARO E-------.--- 02 94 3 1_ __60 _ _ TORRES, FRANCES 01 22 48 2 60 TORRES,GUAOALUPE MARIA 01 07 48 l 60 -----__,-___.,.__T~O:.:R.;.:R.~E S, JO SE _____. .__ _. ._. __0 _=0 _._,9._9: 5 5 2 TORRES,ROOOLFO 01 32 61 2 60 TOUSIGNANT,JOHN E. 03 08 20 2 60 -~------.~~~TOVAR., LEGARO _ 60 TUSHBANT,CARY 02 28 28 2 60 01/31/70 08/31/70 02/28/70 ltl83.10 08/31/70 ___ __ o 212 a110co-_ ._ _____ _:"2."._.-=1.s:-;. __- --.;oa131110_----~. . 01131110 65.55 08/31/70 02/13/70 85.00 08/31/70 02/28/70 11.75 08/31/70 --~- 02128110 918.80 08/31/70 02/28/70 02/28/70 02/28/70 01/31/70 25.35 33.50 63.05 _____ 828.35 393.10 426.80 OU28l10 02/28/70 02/28/70 02128170 ~~~ 02/28/70 02./20/70 02/28/70 -----.-~ 02/2S/70 a.so 323.70 324.80 310.85 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 -~0_,._8~/_3_ l /70 ----1 08/31/70 08/31/70 0 8 /3 l /-=7--0= ____ 08/31/70 08/31/70 ___0 8 / 31 /-=7--0=---~- 08/31/70 02128110 08/31/70 02/28/70 20.~o oa131110 --~--- ~-~~--''------~___.--~ ~--- 01/31/70 02/28/70 02128110 _ 02/28/70 6.00 21. 75 46.50 10.10 73,087.55 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 ______ 08/31/70 , ' ____ __s" "" ""'A-'-N'- T A 6 AR 8 AR A GENERAL HOSP ITAL UN l EU TA , S YL V I A USHER,KERRY L. lNOlGENT ACCOUNTS DELETED FROM MASTERFILE ~~ MONTH ENOING 08/31/70 PAGE 11 ~- ____ ~PAYCOOEC S) l As T e [ L ~ 1-N-'--G'-_ _A .;C.;;.C.;;_T.;_;B;A;.;-L="A'-'"_NC~ E _- ---0'--E"- LET ea:___ __ 02 92 56 2 60 02/28/70 19.70 03 14 27 z. 60 25.15 ~-------~~~--~V~~AN WlCKLE,RICHARO f. 03 02 45 l 60 ____ __~ 02/28/70 02/28/70 606.80 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 ' VANOERVOORT,SUZANNE VELASCO,AOELlNA VENEGAS MAR TIN VILLASENOR,MIGUELINA WALKER,OAVIO L. 02 15 31 2 03 09 94 2 02 89 57 2 03 06 64 l 03 14 12 2 - WALKER,GLEN E. 02 41 60 2 ~~--~-~----~~- WAR O, VIOL ET C. 01 24 Ob 2 WATSON .LAWRENCE EUGENE 02 87 29 l 60 60 60 60 60 bO 60 ~-WA TTS,ROBERT C-=-----___----~~ 03 06 74 1 _ 60_._ WEBBER , BRUCE WHEELER,ROBERT J. 03 01 77 2 01 11 04 2 60 60 02/28/70 Ol.128110 02/28/70 02/13/70 02128110 02/28/70 02/28/70 02/28/70 ll.50 21.50 820.90 17.75 10.60 186.60 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 08/31/70 02/28/70 1,374.35 08/31/70 ~~-~~ --- -~~ 02/28/70 02128110 590.40 13.30 08/31 /70 08/31/70 -~ -------.,.____.-~ _ W l LEY, SANORA A. 01 5 2_ 60 _______ 02/28/70 ___ _ 2.10~__,. __ 08/31/70~~-- W!LK I NS ,JOSEPH C. WILLIAHS,JOHNNY G. WILLIAMS ,N.BE VERLY WORTHlNGTON,ROLANO ZEZULKA,CAROLYNCEfFIE) lUNIGA,MARlA 02 81 88 2 02/28/70 64.10 08/31/70 ----- 03 10 25 2 60 02/28/70 19.15 08/31 /70 --01 86 99 2 60 0 l / 3_l/ 7_,0 ____ 211.20 183.00 08/31/70 01 50 56 l 02128110 08/31/70 02 83 86 l 02/28/70 00 80 0 1~~~6~0"----~~~~_.__,._~0~l~/23/70 60 01 95 05 1 Ol 13 17 l 40 1 l (p 0 ~ ~o 02/28/70 02/28/70 08/31/70 ~--------6-~3~2~9~0~~~-08_/_31/70--.--,._- 89.00 08/31/70 754.25 08/31/70 86,'903.85 ---~~~.-.~--__,NO .I NO IGE f'IT ACCOUNTS DELETED THIS MONTH - 273 _ _ _,. _ __86, 403.85 November 9, 1970 245 Crocke~-Citizens d In the Matter of Claim of Crocker-Citizens National Bank for Refund of Taxes Natl. ailk Tax Refun as Executor of as Executor of Will of John H. Petras, Deceased, and Agnes Veronica Petras, in the John H. Petras Wil Applicat. to file Late Claim Claim agst. Co. behalf of Jose Aranda for Alledged Pers. Injury. I Release of Oil Wel Drilling Bond. J Approval of Ri~er to Oil Drilling Bond. .1 Publication Ord. No. 2124 2125. /I Reports ' Co1111iniiona. I r Amount of $1,220 . 67 . Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the above-entitled claim be, and t he same is hereby, referred to the County Counsel. In the Matter of Application to File Late Claim and Claim Against the County filed by E. Jerald Haws , Attorney, on behalf of Jose Aranda for Alleged Personal Injuries in the Amount of $6,724 .86, plus unknown amount . Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and car- ried unanimously, it is ordered that the above- entitled claim be, and the same is hereby , referred to the County Counsel for rereferral to the County ' s insurance carrier. In t he Matter of Release of Oil Well Drilling Bond. Pursuant to the request of the County Petroleum Engineer, and in accordance with the provisions contained in Ordinance No . 1927; Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carrie:l unanimously, it is ordered that the following oil well drilling bond be, and the same is hereby, approved: 1Pacific Indemnity Company - Blanket Bond No . 119594, covering well : Tompkins 3, County Permit No . 2850 , Standard Oil Company . , In the Matter of Approval of Release of Rider to Oi1 ~rilling Bond Pursuant to the request of the County Petroleum Engineer, and in accordance with the provisions contained in Ordinance No . 1927; Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the following rider to oil drilling bond be, and the same is hereby, r eJeased as to all future acts and conditions . ; Hartford Accident and Indemni ty Company - Blanket Bond No . 3507930, covering well: United California 44, County Permit 3504, Continental Oil Company . In the Matter of Publication of Ordinances Nos . 2124 and 2125 . It appearing from the Affidavits of Publication of the Principal Clerk of the Santa Barbara News -Press t hat Ordinances Nos . 2124 and 2125 have been published in the manner and form required by l aw . Upon motion, duly seconded, and carried unanimously, it is determined that said Ordi nances Nos . 2124 and 2125 have been published in the manner and form required by law. In the Matter of Reports and Communications . The following reports and communications were received by t he Board and ordered placed on file : 246 Communication from Planning Comm. for Info. Oiily 1 Rider to Oil Well Drilling Bond. I 1.elease of Oil Well Drilling Bon I Only. November 9 , 1970 / 1) Administrative Officer - Travel Report S11mmary, October 1 thru 31, 1970. ; 2) Order of Dismissal on Application of Golden West Airlines to PUC for Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to provide passenger air carrier service to and from Santa Maria Airport . 13) State Board of Equalization - Report re Trade Outlets and Taxable Retail Sales, September 25, 1970. 14) State Controller - Annual Report of Assessed Valuation and Tax Rates of Counties of California, FY 1970-71. 1 5) California Secretary of State - Certification of Santa Maria City Ordinance approving Annexation No . 58 ~ (Sander Mobile Home Park) . i In the Matter of r.ommunications from Planning Commission for Information The following communications were received from the Planning Commission for information only and ordered placed on file: I 1) Granted Conditional Use Permit on request of Jehovah ' s Wi~nesses, S.B. Congregation (70-CP-56) to allow construction and use of church on property located on southeast corner of North Fairview Avenue and La Goleta Road, Goleta . Denied request of Donald G. Michaelsen and Joseph A. . Dudder (70-RZ-87) for variance (Sign Regulations) to allow one off-premise, freestanding sign at Holiday Inn to replace existing sign, property located between Calle Real and Hwy 101 near junction of Kingston Avenue, Goleta . In the Matter of Approval of Rider to Oil Well Drilling Bond . Pursuant to the request of the County Petroleum Engineer, and in accordance with the provisions contained in Ordinance No . 1927; Upon motion of Supervisor Be attie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the following rider to oil well drilling bond be, and the same is hereby, approved: Shell Oil Company - The Travelers Indemnity Company, Blanket Bond No . S-305, i n the amount of $25,000. 00, dated October 23, 1970, covering Erburu property wells in Capitan Field ''Nos . 1-29, inclusive'' . In the Ma~t~r of Release of Oil Well Drilling Bond. Pursuant to the request of the County Petroleum Engineer, and in accordance with the provisions contained in Ordinance No . 1927; Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the following oil well drilling bond be, and the same is hereby, released as to all future acts and conditions: Mobil Oil Company - Pacific Indemnity Company Blanket Bond No . 239798, covering Erburu property. Erburu 17 was approved by Board of Supervisors on 10- 9-61; Erburu 18, 22, 23, 24, and 26 on 1- 3- 61; Erburu 27 on 1- 29- 62; and Erburu 28 and 29 on' 7- 30- 62; The non-permit numbered wells are not listed by name as being added by endorsement on Mobil ' s bond; they were automatically on blanket bond when acquired . Resolution In the Matter of Resolution authorizing and directing Auditor- Controller to authorizing ~directing issue warrant re Condemnation Proceedings for Road Purposes, County vs . Fraser, S.C.C. Controller to issue warrant #88058, from Road Fund. re Condemnati n for Road pur- Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried poses, Co. vs Fraser. / unanimously, it is ordered that the above-entitled resolution be, and the same is l t hereby, removed from the agenda. Rec. Tentative Map Tract #11,225. I 247 November 9, 1970 In the Matter of Planning Commission Recommendation for Approval of Tenta. tive Map of Tract #11,225 Generally Located Approximately 500 Feet Westerly of Kingston Avenue on South Side of Calle Real and Adjacent to Highway 101, Third Supervisorial District . The Planning Commission submitted subject written recommendation for approv9l subject t~ certain conditions . The Road Commissioner submitted another letter of condition, dated October 20, 1970, subsequent to the letter submitted dated September 25 , 1970, requesting that Paragraph 21 in the letter of September 25, 1970, be deleted, and the following substituted: "Paragraph 21 - Engineer and construct County standard concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks, driveways and matching asphalt paving along the frontage of subject tract on Calle Real . Sidewalks to be s ix feet in width and constructed against the curb . Stage construction of improvements to Calle Real on the frontage of Lot 4 will be allowed only if tract is unitized with Lot 4 being Unit 1. Improvement s to Call e Real on the frontage of Lots 1, 2 and 3 shall be constructed as required by the Road Commissioner upon recordation of map of Unit II of subject tract. " H. H. Divelbiss, Planning Director, pointed to a transparency on the screen, of the 4-lot subdivision map . Leland R. Steward, Road Commissioner, explained the request for modificatio~ of the conditions, as requested by the developer, Michael Towbes . He mentioned the planned commercial strip of land between U. S. Highway 101 and Calle Real north of Goleta which Mr . Towbes is subdividing as a unitized development from the east toward the west . The condition of the map was about the first unit having the street improvements put in and widening of Calle Real for the entire length of the parcel . He feels this is a burden and would like to have approval to make only improvements on the first unit . The curbs, gutters and sidewalks would be put in for the second part of t he project . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and car-ried unanimously , it is ordered that the recommendation of the Planning Commission to approve the Tentative Map of Tract 4/:11, 225 stamped ''Received August 11, 1970 Santa Barbara County Planning Department", Assessor ' s Parcel No . 69- 110- 57, generally located approximately 500 feet westerly of Kingston Avenue on the South side of Calle Real and adjacent to U. S. Highway 101, Third Supervisorial District be, and the same is hereby, confirmed, with the requested modification of Paragraph 21 of the Road Commissioner ' s letter of September 25, 1970, as hereinabove- indicated, and subject to the other. following conditions: Compliance with Departmental Letters: 1) Road Department dated October 20, 1970, amending letter of September 25, 1970. 2) Public Works dated September 17, 1970 . 3) Flood Control Engineer dated September 18 , 1970. 4) Health Department dated September 29, 1970. 5) Fire Department dated September 14, 1970 . I I 248 ' Complaint on Behalf Mille Sta. by Vall""""' Motors, Sant Maria. / SALARIES Compensation Monthly Salaried Poa. Co. Employee Laguna Co. Sanitation Dist. I Chg. Automat Starting Salary Staff Nurses. Co. I Bid Constr. Lakeview ltd, Santa Maria. I November 9, 1970 Compliance with Planning Department recommendations: 1) A street tree planting plan shall be filed for approval . A bond shall be required in the amount of $7 .50 per tree to assure compliance with the approved plan ~nd a non- refundable cash amount of $15 .00 per tree shall be deposited with the Road Department for the maintenance of the trees after they have been planted. 2) Public utility easements shall be provided in the locations as required by the utility companies . In the Matter of Complaint from Attorney Gertrude B. Chern on Behalf of Millers ' Station for Alleged Violation of Ordinance No . 661 by Valley Motors, 2370 South Broadway , Santa Maria . Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to County Counsel and the Planning Director for further investigation. (SEE INSERI) In the Matter of Fixing Compensation for Monthly Salaried Positions for All County Employees Effective December 1, 1970. (Annual) Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO . 70 - 676 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Fixing Compensation for Monthly Salaried Positions of County Employees under Laguna County Sanitation District Effective December 1, 1970. (Annual) Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, the following resolution ~\las passed and adopted : RESOLUTION NO . 70- 677 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Changing the Automatic Starting Salary for Certain Classes of Positions in the County Service Effective December 1, 1970 (Staff Nurses) . Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted to continue the Board policy established in November, 1966 for hir~ng Staff Nurses dependent on their experience and education: RESOLUTION NO . 70- 678 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Awarding Bid for Construction of Lakeview Road, Santa Maria, Job No . 5017 .1 The Affidavit of Publication being on file with the Clerk, the following bids were opened at a meeting held on November 5, 1970, in the County Clerk' s office at the Santa Maria County Office Building; the roll was called, and the following representatives of departments were present: County Counsel, Road Commissioner; and J . E. Lewis, Clerk: Complaint of Leltoy D. Hunt Goleta Valley Water Dist. / Allowance, Disallowance Compensation for MQ. Salaried Positions. I llowance, Disallowance of Positions - Fixing of Compensatioa for M. Salaried Positions. / Book 138 Pg 248 Supervisor Callahan present at this time . In the Matter of Complaint of LeRoy D. Hunt on Alleged Violation of Condition for Screen Planting, Goleta Valley Water District (69-CP- LA) . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the Planning Department for report back to the Board. In the Matter of Allowance of Positions, Disallowance of Positions, and Fixing of Compensation for Monthly Salaried Positions . (Effective November 9, 1970, Santa Barbara General Hospital) Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO . 70- 674 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Allowance of Positions, Disallowance of Positions, and Fixing of Compensation for Monthly Salaried Positions. (Effective December 1, 1970, Agricultural Extension Service) Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO . 70- 675 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) ,. Rec. from Rd.Comm. oa ltequest for Traffic ltegulatinn Janin Acres Proper ty Owners; Solvang Area. / November 9, 1970 1) M. J . Hermreck 2) C. Sanchez & Son, Inc. 3) A. J. Diani Constr. Co . 4) Arthur Q. Evans 5) Burke Constr . Co . 6) Hi-Way Constr., Inc. 7) Harold D. Peterson 8) Madonna Constr. Co. The engineer ' s estimate was $30,898. 00. $25,246 . 50 $26,648 . 00 $27,694.75 $29,337 . 50 $30,191.50 $31,567.50 $37,627.75 $64,960.00 Following referral to the County Counsel and the Road Commissioner, the Road Commissioner submitted a written recommendation to award the contract to M. J. Hermreck, Inc . , P. O. Box 217, Nipomo, the low bidder It appearing that the bid of M. J . Hermreck is the lowest and best bid re- . 249 ceived from a responsible bidder, and that said bid is satisfactory and in accordance with the notice inviting bids for said project. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the bid of M. J. Hermreck, in the amount of $25,246 .50 be accepted, and that the contract for said project be awarded to the said contractor at the price and upon the terms and conditions set forth in said bid and in said notice inviting bids . It is fur ther ordered that the Road Commissioner be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to prepare the necessary contract for the work; and the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute said contract. In the Matter of Report and Recommendat ion from Road Commissioner on Request of Janin Acres Property Owners in Solvang Area for Traffic Regulations on Private Roads . Subject report was read by the Clerk which recommended the setting of a date for public hearing. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the County Counsel for preparation of the necessary documents in proper order to submit to the Board in order to set a hearing date, as recommended by the Road Commissioner . Approval of Plans In the Matter of Approval of Plans and Specifications for Construction of Specs. for Cona struction of New New Surgical Unit, Santa Barbara General Hospital . Surgical Unit,S.B. Gen. Hospital. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and car- I ried unanimously, it is ordered that the plans and specifications submitted by the Director of Public Works for construction of a new surgical unit at Santa Barbara General Hsopital be, and the same are hereby, approved. It is further ordered that Thursday, December 10, 1970, at 3 o ' clock, p.m. be, and the same is hereby, set as the date for the opening of bids, and that notice be given by publication in the Santa Barbara News-Press, as follows, to-wit: for: NOTICE TO BIDDERS Notice is hereby given that the . County of Santa Barbara will receive bids ''Additions and Alt erations to Santa Barbara General Hospital, Santa Barbara, California'' 250 November 9, 1970 ' Each bid will be in accordance with drawings and specifications approved by the Board of Supervisors and on file in the OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, COUNTY ENGINEERING BUILDING, 123 EAST ANAPAMU STREET, SANTA BARBARA, CALIFORNIA, where they may be examined . Prospective bldders' may secure copies of said drawings and I specifications at the OFFICE OF ARENDT/MOSHER/GRANT, A. I .A. , 1435 ANACAPA STREET, SANTA BARBARA, CALIFORNIA 93101, upon depositing $50 .00 for each set of documents, which deposit 't'lill be returned if said drmqings and specifications are returned complete and in good condition to the off ice of the Architect within ten (10) days after the opening of the bids . Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California (Amended by Statutes 1968, Chapter 699, Paragraph 1, operative July, 1969) the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara has directed the publishing of the prevailing wage rates with a copy of the same being on file at the Office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors . EACH BID SHALL BE MADE our ON A FORM TO BE OBTAINED AT THE OFFICE OF ARENDT/ MOSHER/GRANT, A. I .A. : shall be accompanied by a certified or cashier ' s check or bid bond for ten (10) percent of the amount of the bid, made payable to the order of the Treasurer of Santa Barbara County, Santa Barbara , California; shall be sealed and received in the Office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Santa Barbara County, County Administration Building, 105 East Anapamu Street, Santa Barbara, California, 93104, on or before 3:00 P.M. on the 10th day of December, 1970, and will be opened and publicly read aloud at 3 :00 P.M. of that day in the Board of Supervisors ' Conference Room located on the 4th floor of the Santa Barbara County Administration Building. The above mentioned check or bond shall be given as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the contract if awarded to him and will be declared forfeited if the successful bidder refuses to enter into said contract after being requested so to do by the Board of Supervisors of said County . The Board of Supervisors of Santa Barbara County reserves the right to reject any or all bids or waive any informality in a bid. No bidder may 't'lithdraw his bid for a peri od of thirty (30) days after the date set for the opening thereof. Dated: November 9, 1970 J . E. LEWIS (SEAL) County Clerk Santa Barbara, California Resolution In the Matter of A Resolution of the Board of Supervisors of the County of to set Publi Heariug Con. Santa Barbara to Set a Public Hearing for the Consideration of Revocation of Approval of llevocatio of Approyal of Rancho Cuyama No . 2 Subdivision, Fifth Supervisorial District. llancbo Cuy No.2 Subdiv. Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried J unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted to set a hearing date on subject proposal for Monday, November 30, 1970, at 2 o ' clock, p .m. , and that notice be given to the property owners involved, and by publication of subject resolution as the notice in the Santa Ma ~i a Times, a newspaper of general circulation: RESOLillION NO . 70- 679 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) I If 51 November 9, 1970 ltecoD1D. S .B. Co. Taxpayers Assoc. In the Matter of Recommer.dation of Sa. ta Barbara Cou ty Taxpayers Association for Developmt. of New Five-Year Capital Outlay Pl., ( ltecormn. of S .B .Co. Taxpayers Assoc. on Co. Library Costs. 1 for Development of New Five-Year Capital Outlay Pla1 Norman H. Caldwell, Director of Public Works, reported that some work has been done on this at t he Board ' s request, and will proceed with the recommendations and compile a list of projects for discussioa by the Board at a later date . Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unaLimously, it is ordered that subj ect Matter be , and the same is hereby , placed on file, with copies to be transmitted to the Administrative Officer and Public Works Director In the Matter of Recommendatiotts of Santa Barbara Coupty Taxpayers Associati on County Library Costs . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be , and t he same is hereby , referred to the County Library Advisory Committee. omplaint from I n the Matter of Complaint from Mrs . Genevieve McMahon of Disturbance of the Genevieve McMah 'D I Co111Dunicationa for Enforcemt. of Ord. Regulating Use of Motor Vehicles on Private Property. (Motorcycles) I Peace on Property Located at 555 Live Oaks Road, Montecito . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered t hat subject matter be, and the same is hereby , referred to the Sheriff. In t he Matter of Communications for Enforcement of Ordilarce Regulating Use of Motor Vehicles on Private Property (Motorcycles) . The following communciations on subject matter were read by the Clerk: Mrs . Carl Wa1less , Goleta, i n favor of enforcement . Bruce E. Anderson, Goleta, in favor of enforcement . Petition containing signatures of 20 names of people wanting to know where they can ride their motorcycles, and it is unfair that there is a posting at t he railroad tracks in Goleta that no motor vehicles can be ridden on private property or on t he street without a license . During the ensui ng discussion on subject matter, and Supervisor Beattie said that i n Lompoc there is an area t hat could be used for motorcycles on private property , and t here has been some discussion but would require County approval as it is not properly zoned. Supervisor Grant felt there should be an area for people to ride their minibikes, etc . The County Counsel mentioned that a form of release of liability has been prepared which are being passed around the various cycle shops with the idea of using private (Armitos) property . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred I to the Planning Department for study in an attempt to find a suitable area for such use . ltequest Mr.~ Mr In the Matter or Request of Mr . & Mrs . George W. Edmonds for Act ion Regarding George W. Edmon re Traah Burnin . Air Pollution from Trash Burning. I I 252 November 9, 1970 Upon motion of Supervisor Grart, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, re- erred to the Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District Committee . Objection David W. Gle to Tax Incre on Property. on In the Matter of Objection of David W. Gleason to Tax Increase on Property . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously , it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, ree I erred to the County Assessor for reply . Comu11nicatio In the Matter of Communication from Michael Sullivan Regarding Acquisition f ran Michael Sullivan re of Perfect Park in Isla Vista as a County Park. Acquis. of Perfect Park Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carin Isla Vist 1 ried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the Director of Parks to cont act Mr . Sullivan. RecoDBD. for In the Matter of Planning Commission Recommendation for Proposed Adopt ion Proposed Ado t. of Ord. Req. of Ordinance from Request of S . B. County Flood Control & Water Conservation District S.B.Co.Flood Control for (70-RZ- 92) for Amendment to Article IV of Ordinance No . 661 to Apply FH- Flood Hazard Amendmt. to Art. IV of Combining Regulations in Carpinteria Valley (Santa Monica & Franklin Creeks) . Ord. #661. Santa Monica Upon motion of Supervisor Grant , seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and car- ~ Franklin I Creeks. ried unanimously, it is ordered that Monday, November 30, 1970, at 2 o ' clock, p .m. I be, and the same is hereby, set as the date and time for a public hearing on recommendation of the Planning Commission for proposed adoption of an ordinance, from request of the Santa Barbara County Flood Control & Water Conservation Distri ct (70 - RZ - 92) to amend Article IV of Ordinance No . 661 of the County of Santa Barbara , as amended, to apply the FR- Flood Hazard Combining Regulati ons of s aid ordinance (Section 9 of Article VI ) , the area involved consisting of several reaches of both Santa Moni ca Creek and Franklin Creek in the Carpint eria Valley , and may concern propert y described by Assessor ' s Parcel Nos . 1-020-01; 1-020-08, -09 , -10 , -12 and - 15; 1-030- 03 and -05; 3- 030-02, - 23 and - 25; 3- 040-06, - 09, -11, -12, -18, - 25, - 26 , and -32 ; 3- 060-01, 07, -11, -12, -14, -18, - 20, - 24 , - 26 , - 28 , and - 29; 3-070- 18 , - 30, -31 and - 35; 3-101-15; 3- 390-04, - 05 , -06, - 07, - 08, - 09 and - 10; 3- 400-10 and -11; 3- 410- 01 and -02; and 155-170-13, on the basis of the Report of Findings and Recommendation as set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No . 70 - 120 . On land subject to said regulations it shall be unlawful t o do or cause to be done any construction or placing of any structure , or excavation or grading on land subject to the FR-Flood Hazard Combining Regulations without having first secured a flood plain permit from t he Flood Control Engineer . I It is further ordered that notice be given by publication in the Carpinteria Herald, a newspaper of general circulation, as follows, to-wit : Notice of Public Hearing on Planning Commission Recommendation for Proposed Adoption of Ordinance from Request of Santa Barbara County Flood Control & Water Conservation District (70- RZ- 92) for Amendment to Article IV of Ordinance No . 661 to Apply FR-Flood Hazard Combini ng Regulations in Carpinteria Valley (Sant a Monica and Franklin Creeks) . 253 November 9, 1970 NOTICE is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Sant a Barbara , State of California , on Monday , November 30, 1970, at 2 o 'clock, p .m. , i n the Board of Supervisors Hearing Room, Fourth Floor, County Administration Building, City of Sant a Barbar a , State of Californi a , on I recommendation of t he Planning Commission for pr oposed adoption of an ordinance, from reque~ t of the Sant a Barbara County Flood Control & Water Conservation District (70- RZ - 92) to amend Article IV of Ordinance No . 661 of the County of Sant a Barbara, as amended, to apply the FR-Flood Hazard Combining Regulations of said ordinance (SectioA 9 of Article VI), the area i nvolved consisting of several reaches of both Santa MonicJ Creek and Franklin Creek i n the Carpinteria Valley, and may concern property described as Assessor ' s Parcel Nos . 1- 020-01; 1-020-08 , -09, -10 , -12 and - 15; 1- 030-03 and I - 05 ; 3- 030- 02, -23 and - 25; 3-040- 06, -09, -11, -12, -18 , -25 , - 26 and - 32; 3-060- 01, - 07, -11, -12, -14, - 18 , - 20, -24 , - 26, - 28 and -29; 3- 070-18 , - 30, - 31 , and - 35; 3- 101-15; 3- 390- 04, - 05, - 06, - 07, -08, -09 and -10; 3- 400-10, and -11; 3- 410- 01 and - 02; and 155-17-13, on the basis of the Report of Findings and Recommendati on as set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No . 70- 120. WITNESS my hand and seal this 9th day of November, 1970. J. E. LEWIS (SEAL) J. E. LEWIS, County Clerk and Ex- Officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors It i s further ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to County Counsel for preparation of the appropriate ordinance. Ord. No. 2133. In the Matter of Ordinance No . 2133 - An Ordinance Amending Ordinance No . I Appt. 1st Dist. Citizens' Coumitte for Study of Propo Amend. 70-GP-2. I 2128 by Adding a Provision for Salaries for Members of the Board of Supervisors that Each Board Member Receive $1,000. 00 Per Month during Term of Office. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the Board passed and adopted Ordinance No . 2133 of the County of Sant a Barbara, entitled "An Ordinance Amending Ordinance No . 2128 by Adding a Provision for Salaries for Members of the Board of Supervisors . " Upon the roll being called, the following Supervisors voted Aye, to-wit : George H. Clyde, Joe J. Callahan, Daniel G. Grant, and Francis H. Beatti e . NOES : None . ABSENT : Curtis Tunnell . In the Matt er of Appointment of Firs t District Citizens ' Committee for edStudy of Proposed Amendment (70-GP-2) to Circulation Element of General Plan of Santa Barbar a County for Montecito, Summerland and Carpinteria Valley Area . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that a First District Citizens ' Committee be , and the same i s hereby, appoi nted, as follows , to study a proposed amendment (70-GP- 2) to I circulation element of the Santa Barbara County General Plan for Montecito, Summerland and Carpint~ria Valley area: 254 November 9, 1970 Mr . George R. Bliss, Jr . , Mrs . Anders A. Lodahl . Mr . Campbell Grant Mr . Harold N. Smith Mr . John Bianchin Mr . William F. Catlin Dr . J ames E. Gray Chairman Authorizing In the Matter of Authorizing Execution of Right of Way Contract between the Right of Way Contr. btw. County of Santa Barbara and L~ura G. Truax for Construction of Phelps Road, Elwood I Co. of S.B. Laura G.Trua Acres Assessment District No . 2, Job No . 3049 .1, Third Supervisorial District (Parcel / Accept. Gran Deed from Laura G. Tru x by Co. I No . 3049. 1- 26) . Upon motion of ,Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and car ried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute a Right of Way Contract, dated November 9, 1970, between the County of Sant a Barbara and Laura G. Truax for construction of Phelps Road, Elwood Acres Assessment District No . 2 , Job No . 3049.1, Thi rd Supervi sorial Di stri ct (Parcel No . 3049 . 1- 26) In the Matter of Acceptance of Grant Deed from Laura G. Truax by the County of Santa Barbara for Construction of Phelps Road, Elwood Acres Assessment District No . 2, Job No . 3049.1 (Parcel No . 3049 . 1- 26), Third Supervisorial District . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that a Grant Deed, dated November 6, 1970, from Laura G. Truax be, and the same is hereby, accepted by the County of Santa Barbara for construction of Phelps Road, Elwood Acres Assessment District No . 2, Job No . 3049.1 (Parcel No . 3049. 1- 26), Third Supervisorial District; and the Clerk be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to issue a Certificate of Acceptance to the original Grant Deed being held in Escrow Number 164370-LC at Security Title I nsurance Company in Sant a Barbara. It is further ordered that the County Auditor be, and he is hereby, authorized ad directed to draw a warrant from Road Fund Account 140 B 24, in the amount of.$7,500. 00, made payable to Security Title I nsurance Company for the credit of the County of Santa Barbara in said Escrow Number 164370-LC . It is further ordered that the Road Commissioner be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to sign escrow instructions for subject matter for the County of Santa Barbara. Recommend. o Admin.Office to Appt.Supe to Air Pollu Coordinating Council for South Coast Air Basin. In the Matter of Recommendation of Administrative Officer to Appoint Super visor to Air Pollution Coordinating Council for South Coast Air Basin. ion I Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that Supervisor George H. Clyde be, and he is -hereby, , appointed to represent Santa Barbara County for the Air Pollution Coordi nati ng Counci l for South Coast Air Basin, as recommended by the Admi nistrative Officer in his letter directed to the Board dated November 9, 1970; and Supervisor Clyde to attend a meet- I ing of said Council in Los Angeles on December 11, 1970, in the office of Los Angeles County Supervisor Warren Dorn' s office . It is noted that Assembly Bill 83 requires each District within each air basin to appoi nt a member to a coordinating council . Santa Barbara County is re- ' Cor111runica t ion from Travelers ndemnity Co. re S.B.Co. Comprehensive Liability Policy. I Reconnend. of Ad Hoc Cotmnittee on Narcotics Drug Abuse. / - 255 November 9, 1970 quired to appoint one member to the South Coast Air Bas i n and one to the South Central Coast Air Basin. ~ the Matter of Communication from the Travelers Indemnity Company Regarding Santa Barbara County ' s Comprehensive Liability Policy . Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the Administrative Officer . In the Matter of Report and Recommendation of the Ad Hoc Connnittee on Nar cotics and Drug Abuse . Lorenzo Dall ' Armi, County Superintendent of Schools and Chairman of the Ad Hoc Committee, read from a prepared report and the following recommendations were made to t he Board from the Committee following a meeting on October 30, 1970 : 1) That a permanent, on- going County-wide commission be formed to deal with the drug and narcotic problem in the County . 2) That the title for the commission be "Addicti on and Drug Abuse Commiss ion. " 3) That representation on the commission be assigned according to guidelines set forth herewith: 1 . representative from each of the following: Mental Health Department Health Department Probation Department Criminal Division, Sheriff' s Department County Judiciary, Superior Court Clergy 2 . educators, one from the County Schools Office and one from a school district, preferably north County . 3 . young adults , one of whom should be a high school student . 4. community leaders at large, including a PTA representative . Three of these four members shall represent minority groups . A total of 15 members will serve this commission as official representatives . These members shall represent all parts of the County . It is further recommended that a staff person be employed who will serve as Executive Secretary to the Commission and coordinate the narcotic and drug abuse program inthe County. The commission wi ll determine the qualifications of the staff coordinator and assist in the selection process . Mr . Dall 'Armi commended the Board for taking the leadership in seeki ng ' solutions to this awesome problem of drug and narcotic abuse, and it is hoped that this approach wi ll serve as a model for other communities . I Recently, AB 1990 (McDonald of Ventura County) was passed as part of Chapter 9 of the State Health and Safety Code . Even though there is no companion bill to I provide for funds to support this activity, Assemblyman McDonald intends to introduce legislation this coming year to provide for funds for this function . Reference was made to the possibility of the employment of a staff member to coordinate the effort 256 November 9, 1970 With regard to the chairmanship of such a commission, Mr . Dall 'Armi indicated he would prefer being assigned as ex-officio, but he would accept this post if appointed by the Board. Supervisor Callahan pointed out that once the commission is organized, it should appoint the chairman by an elective procedure . There would be a different method of operating in that the staff employee would coordinante the effort by gathering materials for the agenda and structuring the meetings of what is being discussed and decisions to be made . This seems to work well with other commissions . The role of this commission will not be the same role as on the Ad Hoc Committee . During the ensuing discussion of employing a full- time County staff member as Executive Secretary, it was pointed out that the Area Planning Council has used existing staff personnel . They may be staff personnel within Probation .of Superintendent of Schools offices, in the formative stages, doubling as an Executive Secretary. There are no State funds available at the moment to operate this commission. Mr . Dall 'Armi said the funds will be needed only for the remainder of this fiscal year rather than the full year . The Committee has discussed this in detail and it was made clear that the commission, itself, should resolve this particular problem. He personally feels that the person employed to serve in this role is one who will have to possess many special qualifications . Perhaps more effective leadership would evolve from employing someone who is not strapped to any particular agency. If a cooperative funding problem is developed, the Board of Education could contribute a fair share to fund this particular project for the remainder of the fiscal year . If the right person is employed, the State and Federal grants would more than support this position and perhaps a staff in the future . With specific recommendations forthcoming from the Ad Hoc Committee, this Board can select the Commission before the first of the year; so, the first organizational meeting should get under way by January, 1971, and to have a paid staff member on duty . Mr . Dall 'Armi indicated his willingness to convene a meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee next week in order to submit a list of nominees for commission membership for screening by the Board of Supervisors . Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the recommendation of the County-wide Ad Hoc Committee on Narcotic and Drug Abuse to form a permanent on-going County-wide commission to be known as the ''Addiction and Drug Abuse Commission'' be, and the same is hereby, confirmed. It is further ordered that the matter of the Board appointments to said Commission be, and the same is hereby, continued to Monday, November 23, 1970 so the Clerk may noti~y the people, officials and organizations named in subject report as those to be represented on said Commission to submit names of nominees for Commission membership . Recommend. In the Matter of Recommendations of Planning Commission and Agricultural Planning Co & Agricultur Preserve Advisory Committee to Approve Requests for Adoption of Ordinance Amending Preserve Advisory Co Article IV of Ordinance No . 661 to Rezone Properties for Agricultural Preserves; and/ re Adpption of Ord.Amend. or Creation of Agricultural Preserves, Guadalupe, Sisquoc, and Los Alamos Areas . Art.IV of Or #661. I \ 257 November 9, 1970 Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carr i ed unanimously, it is ordered that Monday, November 30, 1970, at 2 o ' clock, p .m. be, and the same is hereby, set as the date and time for hearings on recommendations of the Planning Commissi on and Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee to adopt an ordinance amending Article IV of Ordinance No . 661 of the County of Santa Barbara, as amended, to rezone the following properties, on the basis that they conform to the General Plan of the County, and/or to approve applications to create agricul tural pres erves on said properties under the provis ions of Chapter 1443, Statutes of 1965 , known as the Californi a Land Conservat ion Act , from a land use standpoint , on the basis that they conform to the criteria established by the Board of Supervisors of Santa Barbara County : / 1) Patricia D. Johnson & Kathryn W. Donovan (70 - RZ - 75 & 70-AP-46), Guadalupe, from ''U'' - Unclassified District to 100-AG General Agriclutural District Classification. / 2) Winston F . Wickenden (70- RZ -85 & 70-AP- 58), Sisquoc , from ''U'' - Unclassified District to 100-AG General Agricultural District Classification 1 3) Paul A. Greene (70-AP- 51), Los Alamos, agricultural preserve only . 1 4) Paul A. Gre~ne (70-AP- 52), Los Alamos, agricultural preserve only . It is further ordered that notice be given by publication in the Santa Maria Times , a newspaper of general circulation, as follows, to-wit: Notice of Public Hearings on Recommendations of Planning Commission and Agricultural Preserve Advi5"'ry Committee for Adoption of Ordinance Amending Article IV of Ordinance No . 661 to Rezone Certain Properties i n Guadalupe, Sisquoc , and Los Alamos Areas; and/or Creation of Agricultural Preserves . NOTICE is hereby given that public hearings will be held by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California, on Monday, November 30, 1970, at 2 o ' clock, p .m. , in the Board of Supervisors Hearing Room, Fourth Floor, County Admi nistration Building, City of Santa Barbara, State of California, on rec ommendati ons of the Planning Commission as well as the Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee to approve the following requests to adopt ordinance amending Article IV of Ordinance No . 661 of the County of Santa Barbara, as amended, to rezone properties I described below, on the basis that t hey conform to the General Plan of the County; and/ or to approve applications to create agricultural pre~erves on said properties under the provisions of Chapter 1443 , Statutes of 1965, known as t he California Land Conservation Act , from a land use standpoint , on t he basis that they conform to t he criteria est abli shed by the Board of Supervisors of Santa Barbara County: 1) Request of Patrici a D. Johnson & Kathryn W. Donovan to rezone property described as Assessor ' s Parcel Nos . 113- 070- 12, - 13 , and 113- 100- 04, - 03, located north side of Brown Road westerly from junct ion of Brown Road and State Highway 1, Guadalupe area from ''U'' -Unlimited Agricultural District to 100-AG General Agricultural District Classification, per Planning Commission Resolution No . 70 -106 (70- RZ - 75 & 70-AP- 46) . I I . . . - -----,------------- ----------------------------------,.------ 258 Report from Admin.Office on S.B.Co. Mental Healt Sen ices Budget llevie I 2) 3) 4) November 9, 1970 Request of Winston F. Wickenden to rezone property generally described as Assessor ' s P~rcel Nos . 101- 050-16, -17, and 133- 070-02, - 03, and -22, generally located southwesterly of Foxen Canyon Road approximately 2 miles southeasterly from Tepusquet Road, Sisquoc area from ''U'' - Unlimited Agricultural District to 100-AG, General Agricultural District Classification, per Planning Commission Resolution No . 70-113 (70- RZ - 85 & 70- AP- 58). Request of Paul A. Greene to create Agricultural Preserve on property described as Assessor ' s Parcel No . 133- 100- 31, located on south side of Alisos Canyon Road approximately 3 miles northeasterly from U. S. Highway 101, Los Alamos area (70-AP- 51) . Request of Paul A. Greene to create Agricultural Preserve on property described as Assessor ' s Parcel No . 133-100-32, located on south side of Alisos Canyon Road approximately 2 miles northeasterly from U. s. Highway 101, Los Alamos area . WITNESS my hand and seal this 9th day of November, 1970. J . E. LEWIS (SEAL) J . E. LEWIS, County Clerk and Ex-Officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors It is further ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to County Counsel for preparation of the appropriate documents . In the Matter of Report from Administrative Officer on Santa Barbara County Mental Health Services Budget Review. The Administrative Officer submitted subject written report under date of November 9, 1970, with his intention to recommend the following: 1) That the Board of Supervisors freeze the below- listed amounts of appropriations for the remainder of the fiscal year or until the State alloca~ion is increased so that the County will be reimbursed for its 90% share . Salary & Employee Benefits Services & Supplies 2) That the Board reduce the per diem rate for in-patient psychiatric services from $68 per day to $59 per day, effective November 1, 1970. 3) That the Board direct the Administrative Officer, Hospital Administrator and Mental Health Director to work collectively to't'7ard a reorganization of the hospital ' s in-patient psychiatric ward to bring about a desired coordinated effort . Such reorganization to be made when and if concurrence of all involved is achieved. 4) That the Board direct the Mental Health. Director to expedite the determination of the cost of all out-pati ent services ; and to present such cost determination to the Administrative Officer and to the Auditor-Controller for review in order that specific recommendations can be made to the Board to set rates for such services . Further, that the Mental Health Director be directed to start an agressive billing program to patients and/or responsible parties as well as to the Medi- Cal Program. November 9, 1970 5) That the Board direct the Administrative Officer and Mental Health Director to aggressively seek out all available means of achieving further savings in the Mental H~alth Departmer t budget together with exploring all avenues of acquiring further State funds The report indicated that a meeti ng was held on November 6 , 1970 with Dr . J ames N. Hood, M. D., Regional Mental Health Director of the State Department 2S9 of Mental Hygiene . The Mental Health Director will file an amendment t o the Count y ' s Me11tal Health program budget requesting an increase in the amount for i n- patient services of $85,072 . If granted, this amendment will bring the t ot al planned inpatient cos t i nt o focus wit h what is now realistically estimated t o be $491,500 . Also , other amendments are being cor sidered which may also serve t o increase the state ' s allocation t o t he County . The report showed the revised County budget presented as follows: 1970-71 Adopted County Budget Salary & Employee Benefits Services & Supplies Fixed Assets Total $ 920 , 381 1 , 255 , 085* 34 , 560 $2,210,026 1970- 71 Adjusted County Budget $ 830,508 1,164,615* 34, 560 $2,029,983 Amount Decreased ($89 ,573) ($90,470) - 0- ($180 , 043) The reduction of the in- patient psychi atric rate has been brought about by a census averaging 84% of occupancy . Provided the census remains high in the coming months, the $59 rate will closely reflect costs . Should the census fall materially , the rate will have to be increased. The Hospital Administrator has computed this new and lower rate and will make every effort to maintain it for the remainder of the f i scal year . However, the cost of i n-patient care will be reviewed agai n in December , 1970 to insure that the rate reflects as closely as possible tre t r ue cost s . The following communi cations were received by the Board and read by the Clerk, generally in opposition to the cut in the mental health program and proposed count y f r eeze : Telegram from group of Lompoc and Santa Ynez Valley Citizens Mr . & Mrs . James D. Rollins . Mrs . Robert M. Cheney . Mr. Raul J . Navarro . S. B. Mental Health Association, Inc . S. B. Council for Retarded Children. Sant a Barbara County Superintendent of Schools . Uni versity of California at Santa Barbara . Dr. Norbert McNamara, Director of Mental Health Services, made a presentat i on on Recommendati on #3 of the Administrative Officer for reorganization of psychi a t r ic servi ces , s t rongly recommendi ng all servi ces be put under one unified mental healt h services department, as each day of delay costs the taxpayers money. And, unti l thi s is accomplished , there will continue to be budget problems in mental health services over which he has no cont rol . He made it clear t hat the budget deficits for the general hospit al are not the fault of Mental Health Services Depart ment . He had nothing to say about the ori ginal estimate submitted, although he personally felt it was low . -------- -- -------y----------------------------------------------------- 260 November 9, 1970 Dr . McNamara expressed pride in the record of the operation of the mental health services this past year and the staff has done an exemplary job . Paul Floyd, Assistant Administrative Officer, commented on advantages and disadvantages of placing all psychiatric services under the Mental Health Services as against retention of some services with the hospital . The Mental Health Services department does pay a certain amount of money to the hospital for services . But more time is needed to formulate t11e reorganization in an orderly manner . Supervisor Grant felt that it is not timely to consider a consolidation in between the middle of the 1970- 71 year, as considerable study is required . However, Dr . McNamara felt it will not be accomplished until a decision is made that it sould be accomplished. The whole budgetary problem is related to this because of the poor contact between in- patient and out-patient services . The costs l1ill continue to rise throughout the end of the current fiscal year--there is too much duplication. , The following persons made statements before the Board on subject matter: Paul Floyd, Assistant Administrative Officer, submitted correct figures as contained in the November 9, 1970 report from the Administrative Officer, regarding ''Fixed Assets'' to show under 1970- 71 adjusted County budget $41, 169 rather than the quoted $36,560, the resultant increase of $6,609 for Fixed Assets, or the net total decrease of mental health budget to $173,434 . The Administrative Officer explained the change in rate from $67 to $59 and should the census be lowered, it will raise the rate for in-patient psychiatt ic services . The cost of in- patient care will have to be reviewed again i n 1972. Dr . McNamara indicated his concern about the cuts recommended by the Administrative Officer which are essentially the same recommended to the Board several weeks ago and they have to be made to stay within the State budget While he does not agree, he sees no alternative . He was very much interested in unfreezing the 19 positions listed in the report and filling them as soon as possible . With regard to Recommendation #4 of the Administrative Officer, concerning an aggressive billing system, he indicated agreement in this area. He . again stressed the importance of reducing the cost of in- patient care to effect savings . With regard to Recommendation #4 to expedit~ the determination of the . cost of all out-patient services and present same to the Administrative Officer and Auditor- Controller for review, He indicated that this cost determination request had been fulfilled since last September . With regard to Recommendation #5 of the Administrative Officer, he noted that collecting money will require more staffing and, therefore, would require the 19 positions to be unfrozen and filled Dr . McNamara said that with regarding to seeking a means of achi eving further savings in the budget and exploring all avenues of acquiring further State funds, he has been doing this since he was retai ned by the County and will continue doing so . They have been seeking Federal assistance on funds in view of the cuts by the State. I November 9, 1970 Dr . McNamara said they had met with Dr . Hood from the State last Friday and they were very encouraged and feel that the Ment al Health Services exemplary performance does deserve more money because Santa Barbara County is saving money for the State at the State hospital level, having saved costs of about $500, 000; so some of that should be transferred back t o the County ~ffecting the State savings . That is why he said they are going to submit t he amendment if the Board adopts it hopefully t oday . It was pointed out that it would take until next February for the application t o be processed by the State as it is not known where the money will come from until later . Asked by Supervisor Grant if t his is worth the risk previously referred t o , Dr . McNamara said the risk is very small, comparatively . About the only negative aspect would be the State ' s concern about some i nefficiencies between the i n-patient and out-patient services . The Admi nistrative Officer said he had asked Dr . Hood if the County migl:t expect his support i n promoting Santa Barbara County ' s program in reporting back to the State Director . This County is doing a good job, and would be i n line for ext r a conside+ation in view of the reduction i n census at the State Hospitals . He is going to take a stand in that direction to support the additional funding . Discussion ensued on the total amount of County funds that would be involved in the risk suggested by Dr . McNamara . It depends upon the revenue collected and s avings factor, and is a very complicated formula . Dr . McNamara said the total risk to the County will be the $85,000 and perhaps less . The only factor that seems to be unaccount able is i f in- patient costs continue to rise . If, so, the $85,000 could go higher, but right now there is no way of knowi ng for sure under the present system. The $85,000 is i n the County budget t o cover this with no i ncr ease i n t axes . The followi ng per sons appeared i n support of retenti on of ment al health services without the cuts: Mrs . Robert Esperti . Leland Crawford, President of S. B. Mental Health Association. Herbert W. Knall, National Association of Social t'1orkers . Fred Molinere , Area Admini strator for State Welfare Lance Lane , an out-patient with the day treatment center at S. B. General Hospital . He explained the tremendous rehabilitation he has underg:ne through the effort s of ment al health services . Steve Urzua and Carlos Campos of the Chicanos groups . Charlotte Benson Councilwoman for the City of Lompoc . Mrs . Espi rite Gonzales , representative of Community Action Commission. Dr . Betty Tibbs of Santa Mari a . Colonel Richard Temple (Ret ' d), of the S. B. County Taxpayers Association Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered t hat the recommendations, as hereinabovei ndicated, and contained in subject written report of the Administrative Officer, dated November 9, 1970, as read by Paul Floyd, Assistant Admi nistrative Officer be , and the same are hereby, confirmed, with t he exception of Recommendation #3 . It is further ordered that Recommendation #3 as cor tained in subject report regarding the reorganization of services onder one Mental Health Services Department be , and the same is hereby, continued to Monday, December 7, 1970, and referred t o the Admi nistrative Officer, Ment al Health Services Director, and 261 -----~ -----==------~-------------~~-----~--------------.,.-------.,-------, 262 I Reconnnend. Ad.min.Office re Request for Filling Vacant Positions. I Allowance of Claims. I Hearings on Planning Co 6' Agric.Pres AdTisory Co llecoam. to Approve Ord. Amend. Art. I November 9, 1970 S. B. General Hospital 1 dministrator for further study' In the Matter of Recommendation of Administrative Officer Relative to Request for Filling of Vacant Positior s . Paul Floyd, Assistant Administrative Officer, submitted a l ist of pos itions recommended for filling pursuant to directive of October 26, 1970 by the Board, and includes a list of the 19 positions in the M'ental Health Services to be filled as soonas possible . Most of the positions recommended to be filled are where I ~ recruitment has been completed or in process subs equent to the order, and also positions that are needed to carry out the present level of servi ce within the department concerned . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie,' and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the recommendation of the Administrative ' Officer to fill those pos itions as contained in a list submitted to the Board of Supervisors be, and the same is hereby, confirmed, for the following departments : Los Prietos Boys Camp, Group Supervi sor. (#101~3080 . 03) Fire Department, Fire Battalion Chief. (#110. 2760.08) Fire Department , Fireman . (1/:110. 2880 . 44) Road Department , Jr . Eng~g . Aide . (#140 . 3540 . 05) Road Department, I ntermediate Typist Clerk. (#140 . 3400 . 01) District Attorney, I ntermediate Typist Clerk. (#15 . 3400 . 01); Criminalist (#15.2130 . 01);' and Assistant Criminalist (#15~0485 . 0l) Agricultural Commissioner , Agri cultural Inspector Trainee (1/:120 . 0220 . 01) Public Works, Extra Help . Welfare Department, Community Aide (#155. 1670.05, - 06, - 07, -08, -09 and . -10) . Eligibility Worker Trainee (#155 . 2612 . 27, -28) Eligi bility Worker (#155 . 2608 . 62) . Social Worker (#155 . 65 20 . 01) . Eligibility .Supervisor I (#155.2604. 04) . Eligibility lvorker Trainee (1/:155 . 2612 . 29, - 30, -31 and - 32) The Board recessed until 2 o ' clock2 E:m. a At 2 o ' clock, p .m.' the Board reconvened . . - Present : Supervisors Geor&e H. Clydei Daniel G. Grant, and [rans=.;L~ H. Beattie; and J . E. Lewis, Clerk. Absent : Supervisors Joe J. Callahan and Curtis Tunnell . Supervisor Clyde i n the Chair. . In the Matter of Allowance of Claims . Upon motion, duly seconded, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the following claims be, and the same are hereby allowed, each claim for the amount and payable out of the fund designated on the face of each claim, respectively, t o-wit: (SEE CLAIMS LIST PAGE 263) Upon the roll being called, the followi ng Supervisors voted Aye , to-wit: George H. Clyde, Daniel G. Grant, and Francis H. Beattie. NOES: None. ABSENT: Joe J . Callahan and Curtis Tunnell . In the Matter of Hearings on Planning Commission and Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee Recommendations to Approve Requests for Adoption of Ordinance - 263 November 9, 1970 ., NUMBER I UIU uni Ullf UIU 11919 11811 UNI 11117 AC-1!57 I ' AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANTA BARBARA COUNTY FUND.:;_:.__: ______- 4JATE.~.;;_;__--'--- ~1-17-9 PAYEE - .---.---.- u ., 1.0, . , . .i 89liiaM . - . -.iu .___._lN ld.IJ.ea - -1 , ' . - . --.,. --~ ---- 1flV~Ci-d . .,. -~- --- Cllml PURPOSE -i., . . u., Niie "-1Mr .-it* . Clfl'~ .r.-= . T.,. ~ . SYMBOL I Sia 1 aa n uau Ut8M 1111 Ua11 nan u a 1 uau uan Mau 17 A 14 17aU a n aD au ~ 71 a I WARRANT ALLOWED FOR . ,. . D.U _,. in.a. aw.a JI.it a.ts a.se 11.t M.'6 lSS.SI u . 17.79 M2 u . , lOS.M , 17 s IA.It "'" U.70 J.IO 11.aw Ul.M 411.Jt . 1u.11 w . 41l. J:.JM.N . u . , , REMARKS . ' . I ' I AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER .SANTA BARBARA COUNTY _ NUMBER l PAYEE PURPOSE . .C.l , . ~ ----- ~ .,_ .-. Qp UM6 , . ,. ., - . UIU . 0. . ,. ~ 11117 Jin~ 11171 uaM UIJ7 AC-1!57 .__. . 1 ua. . -.~. .,. ClliallllO. a a.c ._. o z 119ltieaa. . a. ~----- 1 '-'-- hda. , . . - , . . . .-. -- - SYMBOL ,. a a , YI a UC . nan ,,. , 1 ttU Ha a I ua a 181 ll 1na11 ,. . - ,., 11 maa ltr 111' ii U'M WARRANT ALLOWED FOR .". us . . . . . . a.a IMdt u . . , . 171 . ,. . 1 ll.00 . . ll.tt . ,. 1 . . . u.a U.M \ ' REMARKS ' . 1 AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANTA BARBARA COUNTY FUND,--=== :._ ___ _.DATE---====.:__.!~19'1 NUMBER I PAYEE . Odif 11111~ . , . PURPOSE . ----- utM ---- . Diii -.i . M1Mir 1M7 . . ~ ,. SYMBOL SJe a U uea A IHaU utan Uta WARRANT ALLOWED FOR n.rr 111.u a.ts u.11 , . ua.t a. \ ' REMARKS -.i Ill a l4 a.nau Ul8M tt. . M af'D IDll 11111 11&11 11111 1,lllA 11111 IQ.If 1111, AC-1!57 . ~-. - . _ SJ. oI ., . _ . llllllU .A . . d.o. ~--USU. _ . . eu.111 . . . - a.au . .s . , . ,. u U.JI U.71 . ,. . n. . u , , . u . it . AUDITOR'S WARRANT REG:ISTER NUMBER lll&t 11~119 IUll wn 11111 ' SUM . 11111 UIM 11111 um Ulll 11111 llSM ua . 1IUI JUD WJI llllt w. 111 Ultl IUG JllG lllff llltt llltl , . 111 Ill.ti 11111 illD WU 11111 aun 11111 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY FUND,--======---------.IJATE PAYEE . . aa. - a ._. . . . ,.,. . . - ~a . PURPOSE tlllUMlt Id* . . . - . j u. . ._., . . , . . . i.a. . . ~ _ .P.r SYMBOL .-. ., 111 11 11117 a.aai . . . . 111 au AC-1157 . lt'M I WARRANT ALLOWED FOR . ue. u. 17.11 . , 111.11 lt.D . lY 11.w , a.n u.u . J,.lt1.M i.m.u a .-.n u 1 '"' i.sn n 1.141 . Ml.a 1 . , - 419 . REMARKS 1,., 1.1.1 I AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANTA BARBARA COUNTY NUMBER I 11 UMll Jtstl lllf 1 111 11111 - WM llltf - PAYEE PURPOSE ------- . - , w. Ill . i. finUllC. . - - . . 11171 . ~ W.ft wn 1 -~ WM_ , . 1118 -.-_-__ ~ mn lllJe Ill ft 11181 uw Wll lllda&.~ JllM lU8I Ulll UllY Ull9 UJ.lt WM Ultl aaa llltl ' ,11191 WM llUJ AC-1157 . I.ta . ~--. a . --.&ta - , - . - LU . e-i . ~.011 . ._ __ . _ . j SYMBOL II& a a - . lit a IS WARRANT ALLOWED FOR . . , . , . u . . . n. . . . . REMARKS IS UISMl.M I U?n. M.M n. ''" 111.11 91,., .:.i n.11 ,. 11 . M.M n. . . a. U. er. ~. , . ur.i. - " ' I . - " AUDITOR,S WARRANT, REGISTER I " SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ' ' I PURPOSE SYMBOL 1 WARRANT NUMBER PAYEE ALLOWED FOR REMARKS llbl _ . . 11 ., . IS 11111 . 1.-i . ~ Ulll W&Ut.-a. ~ . u.ae . '' . ., . . 1110 u.oi ;. - ~ . lt J.1191 u . u.u UMJ . ue a aa1 -- . . _. 111 a Ill 118. 117. u. 11. 1an . ., w. Piii! . IDll ' . ltlll a.a. . . 1.11 IDM . . 111.U IDl.1 ~---- ., . 1a11 . llll? . llllt UL lllU . _ c;, UJlt .a. 11111 ._. 11111 ----. --& . i. 21111 ' e. DIM t.u 11111 . lM.O Ulla ~ . 1111' . .a - u.,. ~ . i llllt . w . ,11 111 . 111 1:11u . ~ u.au . Wit . llUJ -.- llUf . - 11117 t AC-1!57 ) AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER NUMBER i 11119 11111 , , ana SIMI JM ti PAYEE a&-. . . . . eaau . . . . - IUlt ,_.- . UHi Calf.I . IUl7 ~--- aaJ&f . II C.llt._ae -u. 1 AC-1157 8-1 . . ""' . .i. SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PURPOSE ~ . . . . . . SYMBOL UI 11 ueaa 111a11 Ma . . lMata in an lfta II 111 a . &II.au 111 a J 98M UaM . M . , w aM 1181' 1111' WARRANT ALLOWED FOR . . - . . 111. Ill.Al 1 ., , 1 . 11.11 ,.,.,. n. . U.11 , . , . -.n U.11 i.m. QM.Ml , . a. ' . . UAM . REMARKS . _ .14, .1 ., . AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER ' SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ' ' ( NUMBER I PAYEE PURPOSE SYMBOL WARRANT ALLOWED FOR REMARKS . , __i tllldl) ,_, 111au maa . .,. 1naw SI.ft . ,. '" l.DaM i.u utaM " u.111.,n -. ' AC1!57 NUMBER u.e a.lllrll IU'1 AC-1!57 ' ' , " . PAYEE AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER . . SANTA BARBARA COUNTY FUND~~~~~~~~~~-iJ ATE -~=:=:.;;;._~:.___=-:.1.97: PURPOSE . SYMBOL & an WARRANT ALLOWED FOR . u ,-;. u. ' REMARKS . . \ . v I AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER . I NUMBER 11171 UIM , ,. , ,. IU7t UIM '*' 11197 la.I l , ' SANT A BARBARA COUNTY . J " . FUND=.==~==------.----~DATE PAYEE ~ ' - ~--- , 4 '\; ll&U . K . . Q. .,Gllll ,_ . ,. . a.a. ., . PURPOSE . IIco- f,tM.l . . SYMBOL 11cau UOa9 n1aM . . llt IA IU mau 11111 . ACl!S7 ,. WARRANT ALLOWED FOR . ., . ., M.JI ., . . in.a u.11 18. , . Ml . ., u.n . , u . .".' 3 , , . REMARKS .\ -- - . NUMBER I AC-1157 . PAYEE . ' AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ,. " '~ . . .,. FUND~~~~~~~~~~_._,DATE~~~~~~~- PURPOSE SYMBOL I WARRANT ALLOWED FOR 1 . . REMARKS . I NUMBER ~ ~-- . ,. . , ,. . n, ' , AC 1!57 AUEITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER r FUND- PAYEE ' . . l --.ii . . . ' . -.au . . w . . uaa. . ' I ' l 4 SANTA .BARBARA COUNTY PURPOSE SYMBOL WARRANT . ALLOWED FOR aa . -- , lldl & u.u . Ull.1 ui. -- . lftAJ. Me&I . na.aa 11 Ma& w.u - UY,.12 '" . REMARKS NUMBER I ACl~7 AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER ' ' PAYEE ~ ., .,. I y .,, ~ ' ' I - 11 ~, (~ . , . ~ SANT A BARBARA COUNTY PURPOSE SYMBOL \ ' ( WARRANT ALLOWED FOR u~u.n , . I,I. , . M.ft , u . - .Ml.a REMARKS I 264 - ' ,; Ord.#2134. Q! , November 9, 1970 Amending Article IV of Ordinance No . 661 to Rezone Certain Properties in Santa. t' Maria, Lompoc, and Tepusquet Areas . This being the date and time set for hearings on subject proposals; the Affidavit of Publication being on file with the Clerk; and there being no appearances for or against subject proposal ; Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the recommendations of the Planning Commission and Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee to approve the following requests for adoption of an ordinance amending Article IV of Ordinance No . 661 of the County of Santa Barbara, as amended, to rezone properties described below be, and the same are hereby, confirmed, on the basis that they conform to the General Plan of the County: / 1) E. B. Miller, Santa Maria area, from 10-AG to 40-AG General Agricultural District Classification per Planning Commission Resolution No . 70- 76 (70-RZ-48) / 2) John B. Wineman, Lompoc area, from 8-R-1-0 and RA-0 to 40-AL-), Limited Agricultural District, per Planning Commission Resolution No . 70-87 (70-RZ-59) . I 3) Arlie E. Lancaster, et al, Tepusquet area, from ''U'' - Unlimited Agricultural District to 100-AG General Agricultural District, per Planning Commission Resolution No. 70-98 (70-RZ- 68) . It is further ordered that the following ordinance be, and the same is hereby, adopted: In the matter of Ordinance No . 2134 - An Ordinance amending Ordinance No . 661 of the County of Santa Barbara, as Amended, by Adding Section 658 to Article IV of Said Ordinance. Upon the roll being called, the following Supervisors voted Aye, to-wit: George H. Clyde, Daniel G. Grant, and Francis H. Beattie . NOES: None . ABSENT: Joe J . Callahan and Curtis Tunnell . Hearing on In the Matter of Hearings on Planning Commission and Agricultural Preserve lteconwn. to Approve Appl - Advisory Committee Recommendations to Approve Applications to Create Agricultural cations to Create Agric Preserves in Lompoc, Los Olivos, Santa Maria, and Tepusquet Areas . Pres.in Lomp c. I This being the date and time set for hearings on subject proposals ; the Affidavit of Publication being on file with the Clerk; Theodore Chamberlin, Jr . , of Los Olivos, made a brief presentation to the Board on his property. There being no further appearances or written statements submitted for or against subject proposal; Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the recommendations of the Planning Commission and Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee to approve the following applications for creation of agricultural preserves , under the provisions of Chapter 1443, Statutes of 1965, known as the California Land Conservation Act be, and the same are Creation of Agric. Pres. in 3 ,4," 5 Super. Dist. / November 9, 1970 hereby, confirmed from a land use standpoint, on the ba,sis that they conform to the criteria established by the Board of Supervisors of Santa Barbara County: / 1) / 2) ; 3} 4) E. B. Miller (70-AP- 22), Santa Maria . John B. Wineman (70-AP- 32), Lompoc . Arlie E. Lancaster, et al (70-AP-42), Tepusquet. Theodore Chamberlin, Jr . & Elizabeth Chamberlin (70-AP-45), Los Olivos . It is further ordered that the following resolution be, and the same is hereby, adopted: In the Matter of Creation of Agricultural Preserves in the Third, Fourth and Fifth Supervi sorial Districts . Resolution No . 70- 680 (ORIGINAL IN PERM'A9ENT FILE) Exec. of Short Fo In the Matter of Execution of Short Form Land Conservation Contracts for Land Conserv. Con. for Creation of Creation of Agricultural Preserves . Agric. Preaeryes. t Upon motion of Supervisor Beattie, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, the following resolutions were passed and adopted authorizing the Chairman and Clerk to execute Short Form Land Conservation Contracts for creation of agricultural preserves: / 1) Resolution No . 70 - 681 (E . B. Miller , 70 -AP- 22, Santa Maria). ' 2) Resolution No . 70 - 682 (John B. Wineman, 70 -AP- 32, Lompoc) . / 3) Resolution No . 70 - 683 (Arlie E. Lancaster, et al 70-AP-42, Tepusquet) . 14) Resolution No . 70- 684 (Theodore Chamberlain, Jr . & Elizabeth Chamberlin 70 -AP- 45), Los Olivos) . &es. Designatg ~n the Matter of Resolution Designating County Fire Chief and Other Fire Authority to issue Permits for Use in Officials as Issuing Authority for Permits for Use in Storage of Explosive and Storage of Explosi e "Blasting Agents. Blasting Agents (Pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 12007, et seq) . / Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted, relative to the Uniform Fire Code: Resolution No . 70- 685 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) Res.Laguna Co. In the matter of Resolution of Laguna County Sanitation District Fixing Sanitation Dist. Feea for Del Cielo the Manner, Time and Place of Collection and Payment of Connection Fees for Del Mobile Estates Trailer Court. Cielo Mobile Estates Trailer Court, Fifth Supervisorial District; and Execution of I Agreement . Contract btw S.~ Co. " Aaron o. Case dba Case tective Agcy. / Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beatti e , and carried unanimously, the following resolution of the Board of Supervisors of Santa Barbara County acting as the Board of Directors of Laguna County Sanitation District was passed and adopted: Resolution No . 70- 686 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Execution of Cont ract between the County of Santa Barbara and Aaron O. Case dba Case Detective Agency to Furnish Uniformed Trained Patrol Officer Services at Times and Places Designated by Administrative Officer and Sheriff-Coroner . 265 266 November 9, 1970 Upon motion of S up ecv is o~ Grant, seco~ded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously , the following resolution was passed and edopted authorizing the Chairman and Clerk t o execute subject cortract: RESOLUTION NO . 70-687 Cont.Hearing In the Matter of Continued Heari ng on Appeal of Raymond E. Spe cer on Appeal lltaymo d E. Spencer Behalf of l . A. Anderson from Plannixg Commission Denial of Request for Conditional behalf of P.A.Anderson Exception and Side Yard Adjustment on Property Located at 1185 Anderson lane , I Goleta (70-V- 44). This bei ng t he date and time set for hearing on subj ect proposal ; Communications were read by the Clerk i n oppositi on to the appeal from the More Mesa Improvement ftssociation and J ohn M. Groebli . Attorney J ames R. Christiansen also submitted a comm.u~ ic at ion, dated October 23, 1970, which explained t he background on t he granting of Lot Split No . 11212 by the Lot Split Committee . The following persons appeared i n support of the decision of t he Planning Commission: Clare Moser, 1475 Anderson Lane . Mrs . J . Dougherty, 5395 Derwin Lane . Irene & Lester Sands, 5325 Derwin Lane . Adeline Rohn, 1451 Anderson Lane . They indicated concern about not being given notice about the appell ant seekir g a further conti .uance as they feel Mr . Andersen has had lots of opportunity to change his request on this . H. H. Divelbiss, Planning Director, explained his department had only fourid out about this request las t Fr iday and had no opportunity to co1tact the interested parties . Attorney Christiansen had raised some questions for which there wer.e no answers . Their position, basically, is that t hey don' t need a v ariance . However , staff disagrees with them, but they brought up some points t hat should be resolved before further discussion and final decision . Mrs. Rohn said this is a beautiful area and s hould be maintained as such i nstead of being broken down. Mrs . Dougherty said high density area with the septic tanks on sandy soil . is not a good ideal for eight families living in one area . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Beattie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject hearing be, and the same is hereby, duly and regularly continued to Mor day, November 23, 1970 , at 2 o ' clock, p .m. at the request of the appellant ' s attorney. It is further ordered that the Clerk be, and he is hereby , authorized and directed to notify Attorney Christiansen and other i nterested parties of such conti nuance . i Approval Minutes Nov.9, 1970 Meetg. Adoptn. of Ord. Amendg. Ord. 661. ATTEST: November 9, 1970 Upon motion the Board adjourned sine die. - The foregoing minutes are hereby approved. airman er Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California, November 16 , 1970, at 9;30 o ' clock, a .m. ' Present:_ Sup~ rv isors George H. Clyde , Daniel G. Grant, and Curtis Tunnell; and J ._ E. Lewis . Clerk Absent: ,uper.yisors Joe J . Callahan and Francis H. ;aeattie. Supervisor Clyde in the Chair . In the Matter of Approval of Minutes of November 9, 1970 Meeting . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the reading of the minutes of the November 9, 1970 meeting be dispensed with, and the minutes approved, as submitted. l n the Matter of Planning Commission Recommendation for Adoption of an Ordinance amending Ordinance No . 661 on Request of Dorald G. Michaelsen and Joseph A. Dudder (70- RZ - 87) to allow for revised Development Plan to permit Construction and Use of 4,600 sq. ft . Single- Story Office Building on Westerly Portion and Cons truction and Use of Gasoline Station East of Proposed Office Building on Property Located between Calle Real and Highway 101 near Junction of Kingston Avenue, Goleta . A recommendation was submitted by the Planning Commission, dated November 5, 1970, for approval of the above- entitled request . 267 Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that Monday, December 7, 1970, at 2 o ' clock, p .m. , be, and the same is hereby, set as the date and time for a public hearing on Planning Commission recommendation for approval of the request of Donald G. Michaelsen and Joseph A. Dudder (70- RZ- 87) (Holiday Inn, Revised Development Plan, Goleta Valley), to amend paragraph a, c, and d (2) Section 387 of Article IV , Ordinance No . 661 of the County of Santa Barbara, as amended, (Ordinance No . 1520) to allow for a revised Development Plan to permit construction and use of 4 , 600 sq . ft . single- story office building on the westerly portion of the property; and to permit construction and use of a gasoline station to be located east of the proposed office building; proper ty in question being identified as Assessor ' s Parcel No . 69- 110- 28, generally located between Calle Real and U. s. Highway 101 near the junction of Kingston Avenue, Goleta Valley, on the basis of the Report 268 l Recoum. Adopt . 0 rd . Amendg. Art . IV :f Ord. 661 . Rezpoe Pr oper ties Santa Ma ia tc Guadalupe; Agric. Prese es. ' November 16, 1970 of Findings and Recommendations as set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No . 70- 119, and that notice of said hearing be published in the Santa Barbara I:!c~1s - Press , a newspcper of general circulatio1 , a!5 follows : Notice of Public Hearing on Planning Commission Recommendation:JOr Adoption of Proposed Amendment to Ordinance No . 661, as Amended . NOTICE is hereby given that a public hearing t~ill be held by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California, on Monday, December 7, 1970, at 2 o ' clock, p .m. on Planning Commission recommendation for approval of the request of Donald G. Michaelsen and Joseph A. Dudder (70- RZ- 87) (Holiday Inn, Revised Development Plan, Goleta Valley) , to amend paragraph a, c, and d (2) Section 387 of Article IV, Ordinance No . 661 of the County of Santa Barbara, as amended, (Ordinance No . 1520) to allow for a revised Development Plan to permit construction and use of 4,600 sq. ft . single-story office building on the westerly portion of the property; and to permit construction and use of a gasoline station to be located east of the proposed office building; property in question being identified as Assessor ' s Parcel No 69-110-28, generally located between Calle Real and u. S. Highway 101 near the junction of Kingston Avenue, Goleta Valley, on the basis of the Report of Findings and Recommendations as set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No . 70- 119. WITNESS my hand and seal this 16th day of November, 1970 S/ J . E. Lewis (SEAL} It is furt~er ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the County Counsel for preparation of the appropriate ordinance In the Matter of Planning Commission and Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee Recommendations for Adoption of Ordinance Amending Article IV of Ordinance No . 661 to Rezone Certain Properties in Santa Maria and Guadalupe; and Creation of Agricultural Preserves. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that Monday, December 7, 1970, at 2 o ' clock, p .m. , be and the same is hereby, set as the date and time for a public hearing on recommendations of the Planning Commission and Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee to adopt an ordinance amending Article IV of Ordinance No . 661 of the County of Santa Barbara, as amended, to rezone the following properties, on the basis that they conform to the General Plan of the County, and to approve applications to create agricultur~l preserves on said properties under the provis ions of Chapter 1443, Statutes of 1965, known as the California Land Conservation Act, from a land use standpoint, on the basis that they conform to the criteria established by the Board of Supervisors of Santa Barbara County: JOB:& November 16, 1970 \ 269 ( 1) Joe U. Ma~ciel, et al, 1320 Philbric Road, (70-PP-39) (70-RZ-66), Santa Maria, rezone from ''U" - Unlimited 2) I g:icu]tural District to the 40-AG, Ge 1eral Agricultural District Classificatior, per Pla:_ning CommissioI" Resolution No . 70-94, on request to rezone to 100-AG . Henry Souza, Rt . 2, Box 318, Santa Maria and Pauline Souza, P.O. Box 4406, Norton AFB, California, (70-AP-56) (70-RZ-83), , rezone from ''U'' - Unlimited Agricultural District to the 40-AG, General Agricultural District Classification, per PlaI".ning Commission Resolutioo No . 70-111. 11 3) Maria Silva, 1008 E. Doane Street, Santa Maria (70-AP-61) (70-RZ-88), Guadalupe Area, rezone from ''U'' - Unlimited Pgricultural District to the 40-AG, Ge ~ eral Agricultural District Classification, per Planning Commission Resolution No . 70-117. It is further ordered that notice be given by publication in the Santa Maria Times, a newspaper of general circulation, as follows, to-wit: Notice of Public Hearing on Planning Commission and }gri cul tural Preserve Advisory Committee Recommendations for Adoption of Ordinance Amending Article IV of Ordinance No . 661 to Rezone Certain Properties in Santa Maria and Guadalupe; and Creation of ~gricultural Preserves NOTICE is hereby given t hat a public hearing will be held by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Sar ta Barbara, State of California on Mo~ day, December 7, 1970, at 2 o ' clock, p .m. , i n the Board of Supervisors Hearing Room, Fourth Floor, County Administration Building, City of Santa Barbara, State of California, on recommendations of the Planning Commission and Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee to adopt an ordinance amending Article IV of Ordinance No . 661 of t he County of Santa Barbara, as amended, to rezone the following properties, on the basis t hat they conform to the General Plan of the County, and to approve applications to create agricultural preserves on said properties under the provisions of Chapter 1443, Statutes of 1965, known as the California Land Conservation Act, from a land use standpoint, on t he basis that conform to the criteria established by the Board of Supervisors of Sant a Barbara County: Ll) , 2) Joe U. Marciel, et al (70-AP-39) (70-RZ-66), property described as Assessor's Parcel Nos : 127-180-37, -35, and - 36, generally located on east side of Philbric Road, southerly and northerly from the junction of East Stowell Road, Santa Maria Valley, request to rezone from ''U'' - Unlimited Agricultural District to the 40-AG, General Agricultural District Classification, per Planning Commission Resolution No . 70-94, from request to rezone to 100-AG, General Agricultural District . Maria Silva (70 -AP-61) (70-RZ- 88) , property described as Assessor ' s Parcel No . 113-040-06, located on north side of State Highway 166 approximately 1/2 mile easterly from Simas Street, Guadalupe Area , request to rezone from ''Utt - Unlimited Agricultural District to the 40-AG, General Agricultural District Classification , per Planning Commission Resolution No . 70- 117. / 3) Henry Souza (70-AP-56) (70-RZ-83), property described as Assessor ' s Parcel Nos . 117-160-22, -02 and 113-050-17, located easterly and southerly from the eastern terminus of Bonita Lateral Road, Santa Maria Valley, request to rezone from ''U'' Unlimited Agricultural District and 10-AG, General Agricultural District, to the 40-AG, General Agricultural District, per Planning Commission Resolution No . 70-111. ~ 270 ' Approval Plan ~Specs. Poin Sal Rd., Casm.alia. / November 16, 1970 WITNESS my hand and seal this 16th day of November, 1970. J . E. LEWIS, County C erk and Ex-Officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors It is further ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the County Counsel for preparation of the appropriate documents . In the Matter of Approval of Plans and Specificati ons for Construction of Point Sal Road from 0 .33 Miles Southwest of Someo Street in the Town of Casmalia to Black Road (Lompoc-Casmalia Road), Job No . 5029 . 2 . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the plans and specifications for construction of Point Sal R. oad from 0 . 33 miles southwest of Someo Street in the Town of Casmalia to Black Road (Lompoc- Casmalia Road), Job No . 5029 . 2, be, and they are hereby, approved. It is further ordered that bids be received for said project on or before December 10, 1970, at 3 o ' clock, p .m. , and that the advertisement for bids to be published in the Santa Maria Times, a newspaper of general circulation, as follows, to-wit: NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS Sealed proposals will be received at t he Office of the County Clerk of Santa Barbara County, Office Building, 312 East Cook Street, Santa Maria, California 93454, on or before 3 :00 p .m. on the 10th day of December, 1970, and wirl be opened and publicly read aloud on said day at said place on or alnut said time for: CONSTRUCTION OF POINT SAL ROAD From 0 . 33 Miles southwest of Someo Street in the Town of Casmalia to Black Road (Lompoc-Casmalia Road) Job No . 5029 . 2 Bids are required for the entire work described therein. Copies of the Plans, the General and Special Provi s i ons and blank f orms suitable for use i n bidding on s aid work may be obtained from the Office of the Road Commiss i oner, Count y Cour t House , Santa Barbara, California, and may be purchased therefrom for THREE DOLLARS (3 . 00) per set, said purchase cost not to be refunded . No bid will be considered which is not in accordance with or on the forms herein referred to . Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California (Amended by Statutes 1968, Chapter 699, Paragraph 1, operative July 1, 1969) the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara has directed the publishing of the prevailing rate of wages with a copy of the same being on file at the Office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors . Re-Issue Bonds Goleta Union Scho 1 District I I November 16 , 1970 - Each bid must be accompanied by a certified check, a cashier ' s check or bid bond in the amount of ten percent (10%) of the total of the bid, made payable to the County of Santa Barbara as a guarantee that the bidder, if awarded the contract, will enter into a contract for the performance thereof satisfactory to said Board of Supervisors . The successful bidder shall be required to guarantee the r.erformance of this contr act by a ''Faithful Performance Bond ' in the sum of one hundred percent (100%) of the contract bid, and a Contractor ' s Bond in the sum of f i fty percent (50%) of the contract bid. The Board of Supervisors reserves the right to reject any or all bids, and to waive technical errors and discrepancies, if to do so seems to best serve the public interest . No bid will be accepted from a Contractor who has not been licensed in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 9, Division 111 of the Business and Professions Code . SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS: "bidders must satisfy themselves by personal examination of the location of the proposed work and by such other means ~s they prefer as to the actual conditions and requirements of the work, and shall not at any time after submission of the bid, dispute, complain, , or assert that there was any misunderstanding in regard to the nature or amount of work to be done . '' By order of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, made this day of November 19 70 ~~~~~~~----- -~----~--~~~-- 16th J . E. LEWIS (SEAL) Clerk of the Board of Supervisors (SEE PROPOSAL Page 272) In Re- Issue of Bonds of Gole ~ a Union School District 1966 School Bonds t Series G - $65,000 .00 . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO . 70- 688 AORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) NOTICE INVITING BIDS ON $65 , 000 .00 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS OF THE GOLETA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that sealed proposals for the purchase of $65,000.00 par value general obligation bonds of the GOLETA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT of Sant a Barbara County, California, will be received by the BG~ rd of Supervisors of the County of Sant a Barbara at the place and up to the time below specified: TIME: December 14, 1970 , at 9:30 A.M. PLACE: Chamber of the Board of Supervisors, County Admi nistration Buildi ng, 105 East Anapamu Street, Santa Barbara, California . MAILED BIDS: J . E. Lewis, County Clerk, Post Office Drawer CC, Santa Barbara, California 93102. ISSUE: $65,000 .00 1966 Bonds , Series G, consisting of 65 bonds of the denomination of $1,000.00 each, numbered G-1 to G- 65, inclusive, all dated January 1, 1971. Said bonds are part of an authorized issue i n the aggregate principal amount of $3,000, 000 . 00 . MATURITIES: The bonds will mature in consecutive numerical order in the amounts for each of the several years as follows : MATURITY DATE January 1, 1972 ( J anuary 1, 1973 January 1, 1974 January 1, 1975 January 1, 1976 AMOUNT $7,000 .00 $7 ,000 .00 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 ~ 271 1dB6 272 MATURITY DATE January 1, 1977 January 1, 1978 January 1, 1979 January 1, 1980 January 1, 1981 November 16, 1970 AMOUNT $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000. 00 INTEREST: The bonds shall bear interest at a rate or rates to be fixed upon the sale thereof but not to exceed 7% per annum, payable annually for the first year and semiannually thereafter . PAYMENT: Said bonds and the interest thereon are payable in lawful money of the United States of America at the office of the-Treasurer of Santa Barbara County, or at the main office of Bank of America National Trust and Savixms Association in Los Angeles or San Francisco, California, or at any paying agency of said county in New York, New York, or Chicago, Illinois, at the option of the holder . REGISTRATION: The bonds will be coupon bonds registerable only as to both principal and interest P f'O?OSAL TO THE COUNTY Or s;.:rTA r:ARSARA Ro ;;.o ,_ - ' - - , . 1.:. l",l\t1 .:.1 I FOR CONSTR'JCT!ON OF PO!NT SAL ROAD From 0.33 Miles southwest of Someo Street in the Town of Casmal ia to Black Road (Lompoc- Casmal ia Road) Job No. 5029 .2 TO THS SOARD OF SUPERV ISORS OF THE COU~TY OF SANTA BARBARA, STATE OF CALIFOR~~:,~ : The undersigned, as bidder, ~e c lares that ~he only person or parties ;nteres:e~ in t hi s proosal as principals a re those narr.od herein; that this proposal is race wi t hout co llusion with any other person, firm or corporation; that he nas corcfully examined that location of the proposed '-''Ork, the annexed proposed 7orr:i o7 contract, and he proposes and agrees if this p~o?osal is accepted, that he ~1i 11 contract with the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara in the fo rm of the copy of the contract annexed here:o, to provide all necessa,ry rach-.ery, too l s, apparatus and other equipr:ient needed, and to do all of the work and fur nish all the materials specified in the contra~t, in the manner and the t!~e . t here in prescribed, and according to the requi rements of the Road Co~~iss:one r as the rein se t forth, and that he will take in full payment the refor the follow ing unit prices, to wit: . l tern .:. s ~ Uni t of . Unit p; i Ce To ~a l i No . Quant . Measu re I tern (in fis:.ires) (i figures)j 1 Lump l Lump Sum I Sum Clearing and Gru~bing Lu:n,: Sum ' Lurn;: Lump ~ 2 Developing \.Jate r Supply Lump Sum Sum Sum I . I . Cubic 3 2,800 Yard Roadway excavation l; 120 Cubic Ditch excavation I . Yard I - 1 - . . . . ,., . .)- ' :\Vi '- . ""l-, . ~- .,,.J ,.:" "'"\"' . . ?~O?OS:L . I I I I I r I C' . Lnit u~it - 10.:c:1 ' -. I - I OT _, ,. . c (, I _c.;, I ~ ~ . . ~o . QL;:):"\ t. M~asu re lte:n ( i r. ficur:;~) I . ,. \ I - \ :-: r.c~ :'C~J -~ I I I I I' I I -L.:7'~ LL mp I - : I Finish rocid\v.:iy l Lu:ilp Sum I . I :-:i L!ffi Sum I I I' I . I I I ' ' . I I !. "00 Ton 1Agsregate Sasa , Cl.:;ss ? . 0 I . I IV . - I I I I . IAspha l : Concrete, Type 3 ("I C'J.-) I I I 7 1 I S50 -I 0:'1 Ton 31411 max . - 500 Tor. 1121 . I . I I ' max .- 315 To:1 3/8'. :ax . ) I l i I . I . 8 S.o -ion Lic;uid asphal i:, SC-70 I ! l I . I j ' ! I . ' (tack I . a 1 2 - Asphal: emulsion RS - 1 ) I ion coat) I I I . I I !' ' l !Asphalt emulsion . I I SS - lH (fog I 10 3.0 I -ion . 1 sea 1 coat) I I I l I I Cu~ic . I Class A concrete (mi nor struc- - 11 I 2 . 0 l r Yard tl!re) , I I 12 60 Linear 3611 reinforced co:'lcrete pi.p e I Feei: . Class I I I I I . t 3511 2411 me:al I x corrugateo Ol;)e 13 50 Linear a rch culvert ( 12 gage) bitumi - . Fee nouc:; coared I ' Linear 4211 2911 corrugated metal . 14 60 x pipe Feet ' culvert ( 12 age) I . arcn 01:um1 - nAU; C:Ol r i:;d . - 15 L:c.o Lumo 6011 bi tur,) i nous coated O~? drop Sum Sum inlet ( 12 g~ge) . 3511 2411 ' . . coated 1 Each x 01tum1nous 16 I "j"-~ c-: 1 f l a rec! end sect 1 on w 1 t:-i toe plate I . 17 I 9 Cubic Class B Concrete (cross gutter) Ya rc:!s ! I . l' I I I '! TOTAL I /l J1 F - I r.c:! i ccitcs final quantity November 16, 1970 NOT CALLABLE: The bonds are not callable before maturity . ASSESSED VALUATION: The assessed value of the taxable property within said district as shown on the equalized assessment roll for the fiscal year 1970 - 1971, and as modified pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Education-Code, is $138 2836,158 . 00, and the total amount of bonds of said district previously issued and now outstanding is $5, 8541 000 . 00 . SECURITY: Said bonds are general obligations of said school district , payable both principal and interest from ad valorem taxes which, under the laws now in force, may be levied without limitation as to rate or amount upon all of the taxable property , except certain personal property, in said school district. TERMS OF SALE INTEREST RATE: The maximum rate bid may not exceed 7% per annum, payable annually the first year and semiannually thereafter . Each rate bid must be a multiple of 1/20 of 1%. No bond shall bear more than one interest r ate, and all bonds of the same maturity shall bear the same rate . Not more than three interest rates may be bid. The repetition of any rate will not be considered the bidding of an additional r ate . The rate on any maturity or group of maturities shall not be more than 1-1/2% higher than the interest rate on any other maturity or group of maturities . Each bond must bear interest at the rate specified in t he bid from its date to its fixed maturity dat e . AWARD: The bonds shall be sold for cash only . All bids must be for not less than all of the bonds hereby offered for sale and each bid shall state the bidder offers par and accrued interest to the date of delivery, the premium, if any , and the interest rate or rates not to exceed those specified herein, at which the bidder offers to buy said bonds . Each bidder shall state in his bid the total net interest cost i n dollars and the average net interest r ate determined thereby, which shall be considered informative only and not a part of the bid . LOWEST BIDDER: The bonds will be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder or bidders considering the interest rate or rates specified and the premli1moffered, if any . The lowest bid will be determined by deducting the amount of the premium bid (if any) from the total amount of i nterest which the district would be required to pay from the date of said bonds to the respective maturity dates thereof at the coupon rate or rates specified in the bid and the award will be made on the basis of the lowest net interest cost to the district . The lowes~ net i nterest cost shall be computed on a 360- day year basis . The purchaser must pay accrued interest from the date of the bonds to the date of delivery . The cost of printing the bonds will be borne by the district . its law RIGIIT OF REJECTION: discretion, to reject any to waive any irregularity The Board of Supervisors reserves and all bids and to the extent not or informality in any bid . the right, prohibited i n by PROMPT AWARD: The Board of Supervisors will take action awarding the bonds 9r rejecting all bids not later than 26 hours after the expi ration of t he time herein prescribed for the receipt of proposals; provided, that the award may be made after the expiration of the specified time if the bidder shall not have given to s aid Board notice in writing of the withdrawal of such proposal . PLACE OF DELIVERY AND FUNDS FOR PAYMENT: Delivery of said bonds will be made to the successful bidder at the office of the County Treasurer of Santa Barbara County. Payment for said bonds shall be made by certified or cashier ' s check on a bank or trust company doing business in California. PROMPT DELIVERY, CANCELLATION FOR LATE DELIVERY: It is expected that said bonds will be delivered to the successful bidder within 30 days from the date of sale thereof . The successful bidder shall have the right, at his option, to cancel the contract of purchase if the bonds are not tendered for delivery within 60 days from the date of the sale thereof and in such event the successful bidder shall be entitled to the return of the check accompanying his bid . FORM OF BID: Each bid, together with the bid check, must be in a sealed enveloper addressed to the County Clerk, with the envelope and bid clearly marked 'Proposal for Goleta Union School District Bonds." BID CHECK: A certified or cashier ' s check on a responsible bank or trust company in the amount of 3% of the principal amount of the bonds, payable to the order of the County Treasurer, must accompany each proposal as a guaranty that the bidder, if successful, will accept and pay for said bonds in accordance with the terms of his bid . The proceeds of the check accompanying any accepted proposal shall be applied on the purchase price or, if such proposal is accepted but not performed, unless such failure of performance shall be caused by any act or omission of the district, shall then be retained by said Treasurer for the benefit of the district . The check accompanying each unaccepted proposal will be ret~rned promptly. CHANGE IN TAX EXEMPT STATUS: At any time before the bonds are tendered for delivery the successful bidder may disaffirm and withdraw the proposal if the interest received by private holders from bonds of the same type and character shall be declared to be taxable income under present Federal income tax laws , either by a ruling of the I nternal Revenue Service or by a decision of any Federal court, or shall be declared taxable by the terms of any Federal income tax law enacted subsequent to the date of this notice . 273 --- -- - --------~~--,---------------------------,.-------------.------;-------, 274 Issuance of Negot. Note Montecito Union School District. I Issuance of 3 Negot. Notes Santa Maria School Distrt. I November 16, 1970 NO LITIGATION CERTIFICATE: At the time of payment for and delivery of said bonds the successful bidder will be furnished with a certificate that there is no litigation pending affecting the validity of the bonds . LEGAL OPINION: The successful bidder must obtain the opinion as to the legality of the bond issue at his own expense . A copy of the legal opinion certified by the County Treasurer by his facsimile s i gnature will be printed on the back of each bond at the expense of the successful bidder if requested in his bid Dated: November 16, 1970 S/ J . E. Lewis SEAL ounty C er an ex-o 1c10 er the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara, State of California In the Matter of Issuance of One (1) Negotiable Note in the Amount of $55,000. 00, Montecito Union School District . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO . 70-689 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) . In the Matter of Issuance of Three (3) Negoti able Notes in the Amount of $240,000. 00, Santa Maria School District. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted : RESOLUfION NO . 70- 690 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) Authorizng.Co. In the Matter of Authorizing the County Counsel to File Suits to Recover Counsel to fi Suits to Reco r Moneys Owed the County for Care and Services Rendered in the Santa Barbara County Monies Owed C rendered in General Hospital . S.B. Co.Gen. Hospital. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and I Aut.horizg. Dpt. Resource ic Collectns. to Recover Monies Owed G . rendered in S.B. Co. Gen. Hospital. I Author izg. Dpt Resour ces ic Collections to Recover Monies Owed Co. in S.B. Misc. Health Center. / carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted : RESOLUfION NO . 70- 691 {ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Authorizing the Department of Resources and Collections to Institute Nec essary Proceedings to Recover Moneys Owed the County for Care and Services Rendered i ri the Santa Barbara County General Hospital . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO . 70-692 ~ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE} In the Matter of Authorizing the Department of Resources and Collections to Institute Necessary Proceedings to Recover Moneys Owed the County for Care and Services Rendered in the Santa Barbara Miscellaneous Health Center. Authorizg.Dpt. of Resour ces Collect s. in Small Claims Cou t Recover g. Monies owed Co. for Damage to Co. Road Propert Co. owned Vehicle . / Approvg. Final Quan of Work Performed, mater ial for Constructn. Sewer I:.ine Impr ovemts. Admin. Center S.B.Co., Santa Maria. 1 Filing of Notice of Completn. Construct . Sewer Line Improvein s. / Accept. of Right of Way Grant L.M. Shadrick for Additn . Right of Way. El Sueno Road. ; November 16, 1970 Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLtJrION NO . 70- 693 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Authorizing the Director of the Department of Resources & Collections to Institute the Necessary Proceedings in Small Claims Court to Recover Monies owed the County for Damages to County Road Property and to County- owned Vehicles . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted; RESOLtJrION NO . 70-694 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE} In the Matter of Approving Final Quantities of Work Performed, and Material Supplied, for Construction of Sewer Line Improvements, Santa Barbara County Administrative Center, Santa Maria, Santa Barbara County, California. . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted : RESOLUIION NO . ZQ- 69;2 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Filing Notice of Completion for Construction of Sewer Line Improvements, Sant a Barbara County Administrative Center, Santa Maria, Santa Barbara County, California . Upon motion of Supervis0r Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Director of Public Works be, and he is hereby , authorized and directed to file Notice of Completion for construe- tion of sewer line improvements, Santa Barbara County Administrative Center, Santa Maria, Santa Barbara County, California. It is further ordered that the Clerk be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to record said Notice of Completion in the office of the Recorder of Santa Barbara County In the Matter of Acceptance of Right of Way Grant Without Monetary Consideration from L. M. Shadrick and Mary E. Shadrick for Additional Road Right of Way to the County on El Sueno Road, Third Supervisorial District. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Super.visor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that a Right of Way Grant from L. M. Shadrick and Mary E. Shadrick, dated November 9, 1970, for additional road r ight of way on El Sueno Road, Third Supervisorial District, be, and the same is hereby, accepted without monetary consideration ; and the Clerk be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to record s aid document in the office of the Sant a Barbara County Recorder . 275 276 Authorizatn. to Execute Ch . Orders 1 it 2 for Miguelito Rd. I November 16 , 1970 In the Matter of Puthorization for Chairman to Execute Change Orders Nos . 1 and 2 to Contract with Tony Sanchez, Inc ., for Miguelit o Road Proj ect No , 403 .1, Fourth Supervisorial District. Upon motion of Supervi sor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant , and carried unanimously, i t i s ordered that the Chairman be , and he is hereby , authorized and directed to execute Change Orders Nos . 1 and 2 to contract with Tony . Sanchez, Inc . , for Miguelito Road Pr oject No . 403 .1, Fourth Supervi sorial District, Filing of Fin 1 Reports !Y Road Coom. on Constructn. / Happy Canyon Rd . Br idge.it Alisos Ave. Br idge,Impr ov . on Ortega Bil Rd . Ortega Ri dge Road from Ort ga Hill Summer l and I Request of Dir. Resources it Collectns for Author . to Accept. Compromise Settlemt. of S.B. Co. Bowl Damages it Release f rom further Coll. KACY Radi o & Tower Pr oduct ions r/ Releasng. Dir Dpt. Resource it Coll. f rom Account. for Collect. Del. Accts. S.B.Co Gen. Hospital I for an i ncrease of $724 . 27 and $2, 862 . 32 . In the Matter of Fil i ng of Final Reports by Road Commissioner on Con- \ struction of Happy Canyon Road Bridge Project No . 3907 and Alisos Avenue Bridge over Happy Canyon Creek, Project No . 3908 ; and Construction of Improvements on Ortega Ridge Road from Ortega Hill Road Northerly to East Valley Road, Vicinity of S11mmerland, Job No . 1918 . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant , and c arri ed unanimously, it is ordered that Final Reports by the Road Commissi oner on construction of Happy Canyon Road Bridge Project No 3907 and Alisos Avenue Bridge oyer Happy Canyon Creek, Pr oject No . 3908 ; and construction of improvements on Ortega Ridge from Ortega Hill Road northerly to East Valley Road , Vicini ty of Summerland , Job No . 1918 , be , and t he same are hereby , accepted for fil i ng In the Matter of Request of Director of Resources and Collections for Authorization to Accept $600 Compromise Settlement of Santa Barbara County Bowl Damages and Release from Further Collect ion Accountability of Remaining $147.00 . Upon moti on of Supervisor Tunnell , seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered th.at the Director of Resources and Collecti ons be, and he is hereby, authorized to accept $600 .00 as compromise settlement 0 Santa Barbara County Bowl Damages for depos i t to General Fund , and be released from further collection accountability of remaini ng $147 . 00 . KACY Radio & Tower Productions In the Matter of Rel easing Director , Department of Resources & Collections from Further Account ability for Collection of Certain Del inquent Accounts , Santa Barbara General Hospital . Upon moti on of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant , and carried unanimously, this Board hereby determines that the following amounts are too small to justi fy the cost of collection, or that the collection of such _ amount s is improbable for the reasons set forth in the verifi ed applicat i ons of - the Director, Depart ment of Resources & Collecti ons, and i t i s ordered t hat the Director be , and he is hereby , discharged from f urther account abi l i ty for the collection of the following amounts , in accordance with Section 25257 of t he Welfare & Insti tutions Code: REQUES'f FOR APPROPRIA:'fION, CM:NCRLLA'fION OR REVISION OF F{ffif)S No'1'ember 16 , 1976 l'\aeitor ' s No . 40 moneys Fund, the Transpor Conservation Fund ar or Retirement the Petroleum De (SEE LIST PAGE 276-A) . ' ' ' \ ' ' November 16,1970 Xlif 8 276-,i 276-A November 16,1970 1 I ' 1 t , - . . . SANTA BARB' ARA GENERAL HOSPITAL ALLEN,EONA A ALLEN,JANET E. ARGENT, MARSHA J. ARNESON,ALVIN L. ARNOLO,ARNOLO W. INDIGENT -~~~~ ----__~~--~--;.ARREDONOO,SALVAOOR_ _~ ----- ASHTON,CONNlE AYALA,RACHEL ----BAILS,LA MONT SECKWITH,OELIACAKA BECKWORTH) SEYELER,DOMENICA I ACCOUNTS OELETEO FROM MASTERFILE MONTH ENDING 09/30/70 ~~-~-~- MRNO PAYCODECSJ ;o._----'-~~="'-~---- 01 94 92 l -- 02 60 23 2 02 77 17 l 01 34 28 1 02 94 17 l 03 1-8 12 l 02 98 59 2 01 41 41 2 03 0-8 -91 2 00 55 52 2 02 32 58 1 26 10 60 11 10 40 60 60 60 11 60 60 11 LAST 81LLING 03/31/70 03/31/70 03/31/70 03/31/70 03/31/70 03/20/70 03/31/70 03/31/70 02/ 28/70 02/28/70 03/31/70 ACCT.BALANCE 80.36 36. 70 851.30 vl'.,660.10 246.95 19.05 9.35 8.50 l 71. 05 767.50 t PAGE- l ~ OE LE TEO 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 . ,_,-----.___.~----;B;.;l:;=L=L-=1- E , JACK -~-------- 03 17 99 1 60 03/31~/7~0~~-~~-.-2=~7~0~5~5~ ___0_ 9/:._3;. 0/70 BINNEBOSE,JOHN PAUL BLATZ STEVE -----~~~~~--B=.;OOKOUT HAROLD A. BOURNE,JUANITA R. BROWN, DANIEL ---~--,.-,.------~~~--=-BROWNLKELLJ BROWN, MICHELLE BROWN,PAUL --~~~----- BROWN, STEVEN BROWN, TERRY BROWN, TODD '-----~----~~- BURKS,JAMES H_O_M_ER ______ ~~~~- BYRNE,M ICHAEL JOHN 02 38 05 1 01 77 30 1 01 29 31 2 03 13 80 2 03 13 7 L 2 03 13 79 2 03 13 78 2 03 13 77 2 -- 03 13 76 2 00 76 97 1 03 18 52 l 11 26 10 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 03/31/70 4.50 03/31/70 35.08 02/28/70 __ ~~-----=;5~7~ ~50~- 02/28/70 02128110 02128110 02/28/70 02/28/70 02/28/70 02/28/70 02/28/70 03/27/70 111.05 8.50 14. 95 8.50 11. 75 ---- 28.50 11.75 15.75 ./_ lt92't.lt5 -~~ 132.05 - . 6,568.19 ,;.:-----~-~--------.---~--~~------~~~--------'----~------------------------~-------~~ 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 I _-__ INDIGENT ACCOUNTS DELETED FROM MA STERFILE ;--"'"---~- SANTA BARBAR_A ___ _.__ ~-------~~~~~~ GENERAL t-OSP ITAL MONTH ENDING 09/30/70 PATIENT NAME MRNO PAYCOOECSI LAST 8llLING ACCT.BALANCE ---------- ----- CABANILLAS, TERESA CALDERON, GEORGE CALOERON,MARIA ISABEL ----,--~--~~ CALDERON,SALVAOOR CANNIFF,RALPH A. CASTRO,BENJAMIN -'-'-~-~.------ CH AVE Z, JUAN CORTEZ,ANOREW COULTER, LARRY J. ---~---- CRAIN,ARTHUR J. CROSS,OORA M. 03 15 66 2 60 - 01 24 08 2 60 02 38 80 2 60 02 44 81 2 60 01 39 25 1 10 40 ' 01 34 59 2- -40 60 ~-~~--- 02 67 49 2 40 11 02 83 02 l 60 02 19 49 2 - 40 60 02 25 16 1 40 'tl 60 02 16 93 1 60 P---~------,_,_C~R=O~S=Si._T:_H~E~R~E=S~A.:__~--~~----- 03 11 22 2 60 OAVIS,THEOA P. OE LA HATER,CHARLOTTE ---~~-------~D=E LUNA SARA OOMINGUEZ,DAN V. 02 34 35 2 , 02 37 49 1 03 10 51 2 00 64 84 1 60 60 60 30 I ' - --- DUCHANE, MAR ION L. 03 15 14 1 60 .-~------ 01 29 30 2_ 60 ~ ~--~~----- ECHEVARRlA,BETTY ESQUEDA, HILDA ESQUEOA,SANORA fARIASrOELIA '-----------~-~ -~.__~----~---- FAUSTINI,JOHN P. FINISTER,LEWIS FOWLER STEVE ~~~~-----.-~~- ~;;;;,.~,.----~~----- FRANSON,JACK H. 01 86 18 2 60 01 01 14 2 60 03 12 10 2 60 02 97 49 1 60 02 38 31 2 60 03 11 31 l 60 - --~~---~~~ 01 14 19 1 60 03/31/10 02/28/70 02/28/ 10 02/28/70 03/31/10 03131/70 03/31/70 03/31/70 03/31/10 03/31/70 03/31/70 02/28/70 03/31/70 03/31/70 436. 75 28.65 87.65 500.50 61.45 13.25 36.80 437.20 9.50 325.00 ---/z,110.50 35.00 99.00 02128110 a.so --~---- 03/31/70 03/15/70 03/31/7-0 02128110 02/28110 02/28-/70 03/20/70 03/31170 03/20/70 03/31/70 67.50 589.95 30.70 6.15 32.50 288.45 5.50 v 2t427.30 136.00 16,665.24 PAGE- 2. OE LE TEO 09/30/70 09/30/70 09130/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09130110 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 --09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09130/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/10 09/30/70 09/30/70 SANTA BARBARA GENERAL HOSPITAL - INDIGENT - . ACCOUNTS OELETEO FROM MASTERFILE MONTH ENDING 09/30/70 ~---- PATIENT NAME MRNO PAYCOOECS) LAST BILLING ----'-'-----'-'--~~~ ~~~ ACCT.BALANCE GOENA,ANNABELLA GREER,FRANCJS C 02 60 88 1 10 40 03/31/70 - 02 80 10 1 26 40 11 03/31/70 02 75 64 2 40 30 03/31/70 96.74 324.00 -~~-______ __:GR~Gt C.;~A"R"""R""I;;; E~GW._l_N_ _____~ ~ a.so --~~--------- --.-~~~ GROM,THOMAS E. 01 22 58 1 60 -- --__.,,-=-----~~-- ---~- HETHERINGTON,FRANCES M. 02 33 62 1 30 HILLOCK, STEVEN GREGORY 01 68 56 1 02 56 13 2 _ 40 60 _;.; _, __ ~__~---- HOLCOMBtSHARON INGL ING, JO- ANN KAPLAN ROBERT WAYNE ~-------., KITAHARAt MICHAEL 03 17 77 1 02 78 24 2 02 11 12 2 KNAUP,8AR6ARA JANE 03 14 77 1 KUZ EN t_4 OANN ----------~~------..0=2- 65 !!_3 2 LAMAS, LUZ MARIA 00 83 63 1 LAMAS, VICTOR 01 84 49 2 ------~~~----LEARY JOHN A. LEOBETTER,lMOGENE LILEStWR-lG-H-T LILO CHARLES 01 70 62 1 - 00 68 76 1 01 85 08 1 '-- L JNDNER JULES J 02 07 83 l LOPEZ,ANTONIO - .__ _________ LOPEZ,BE~ANCJO 01 77 45 2 02 09 09 1 -~-------- - -~~ LOPEZtWILLIAM JOHN 03 14 13 1 LUCERO,JAMES 02 89 66 1 11 60 40 60 --~--~ 40 60 60 31 10 60 60 10 60 26 31 10 26 10 10 26 31 -10- ----- 60 30 -------~~----MAC GREGOR SANORA ANN_ __~ --- 02 5_8 91""--'l;.__.~_____:;6__:0:._~-------- MACHADO JOHN 01 41 85 l 26 10 03/20/70 03/31/70 03/3-1/70 03/31/70 03121110 03/31/70 03/31/70 03/ 15/70 03/31/70 OZ/28110 02/28/70 02128110 03/31/70 - 03/31/70 03/31/70 03/31/70 03/31/70 03/3-1/70 03120110 03/31/70 03/15/70 03/31/70 470.20 4.00 238.90 ---~-;;;__. 99.05 s21. 10 8.10 81.00 278.80 ----12.00 212.00 35.35 266.95 7.90 640.55 15.00 40.00 28.95 lt0.00 7.45 273.35 110.00 22,011.28 PAGE 3. - OElET.EO 09/30/70 09/30/70 --09/3-0/7-0 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30170 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 ~~ 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 ~ 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 t ~ _. _ .,.---~.--___,_~-GENSAERNAT LA BHOA RS PB AIo-R-T=_AA_ l ____ ~~ ,. INOIGENT ACCOUNTS DELETED FROM MASTERFILE MONTH ENDING 09/30/70 ------- __P_A_T_IE_NT_ N_A_M_E _______ __,~~~- MRNO ___ ~_PAYCOOE(S) LAST BILLING ~~---~. - ACCT.BALANCE MADSEN SIGNE t----~~--------M ANZ O, JESUS JR. MARQUEZ,JUAN JOSE MARSHALL,AlVIN J. MARTINEZ,ELOISE G. "--~~-:-------~------ MASON,RONALO_E.Q_WARD ----------- MC OONALO;JOHN J, MC KIN SH,EILEEN MC NAY,ORVAL w.1v MCDANIEL, HARLEY MELERO, CARMEN --------~~--- "ENOOZA RUB_E_N ________ ~~-- MILHOAN, JOHN -. MILHOAN,SARAH J. ~--------.,_~-----.M!!.I:. RACL E JOHN CLARENCE -----~--MORENO, JOSEPH E. MUNOZ,JOSE GUADALUPE NEUB_QLO,JOHN FREDERICK JR ---NOBLE, JAMES O. OKUN,HARRY JOHN "----~----~- OROSC~OIA~NA~----~---~~ ORTEGA,ANTONIO E. PAI SANO, JAMES PHILLIPS MARTHA H -------~-----~~~ PITTS, DAISY - 01 75 52 1 03 08 96 2 01 ltO 05 2 03 14 33 2 00 94 51 2 26 40 10 60 60 ------- 60 60 02 97 94 l 60 -~ 03 14 19 1 02 26 80 2 02 10 78 l 00 69 92 1 02 78 97 2 60 10 60 26 11 60 00 2 .7- :1:6__:2:______ 6 0 03 09 92 2 03 09 91 2 02 39 26 1 02 98 34 1 60 60 ---- 10 --,._.__~ __ _._ 60 - ~ 02 39 49 2 60 03 07 34 1 60 02 17 13 2 60 - 02 99 66 l 60 02 90 8-4 2 30 02 55 62 1 26 60 - - 02 52 55 l 10 01 40 07 1 26 40 10 01 24 19 2 26 30 03/31/70 02/28/70 02/28/70 02/28/70 02/28/70 03/31/70 ~~ 03/15/70 03/31/70 03/31/70 03/31/70 02/28/70 02/28/70 02128110 02128110 40.00 13.55 42.10 42.50 47.50 638.40 999.35 7.65 203.60 39.00 93.60 10.75 ____ ._;_ 14.05 8.50 03/31/70 ___________ 9~52.20 03/31/70 02/28/10 03/15/70 02/28/70 03/31/70 03/31/70 03/31/70 03/31/70 03/31/70 03/31/70 375.40 12.85 ---f'"-' -3,765.25 16.00 3,599.55 23.00 87.10 702.55 102.62 -----~ ---- 36. 85 33,885.20 PAGE' OE LE TEO 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09-/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 - 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 . . ---~---- SANTA BARBARA GENERAL HOS~P ~IT~A-L-~-~~------~ INDIGENT ACCOUNTS OELETEO FROM MASTERflLE MONTH ENDING 09/30/70 PATIENT NAME MRNO PAYCOOE(St LAST BILLING ACCT.BALANCE RAOFORO,VIRGINIA H. RAM-IREZ,OOLORES RANKINS HANIBAL --~-----~- REEO,PAMELA A. REGALAOO,RACHEL I. ROORIGUEZ,LEON CIRO RODRIQUEZ,JOSE LUIS ROMO,JESUS SR. ROSE,GLENN S. ~---~----:,. ROWLAND GEORGE RUIZ, DELFINA R. 02 85 96 1 03 12 76 2 02 01 04 l:.__.,_ 03 09 53 2 -- 01 16 76 2 02 85 26 2 01 45 25 2 01 58 88 2 'tO 60 60 26 31 10 60 30 40 60 60 ltO 60 03 05 41 1 60 -~~ -- 00 81 67 1 26 31 10 00 52 26 l 20 10 ---~- 03/31/70 03/31/70 03/31/70 02/28110 03/31/70 03/31/70 02/28/70 03/31/70 03/27/70 SAARI JACK L. 01 38 32 l~_ 26 3-0=-~----- 03/31/70 03/31/70 03/31/70 02/28/70 03/31/70 03/31/70 03/31/70 08/31/69 03/31/70 SANOOVAL,ROMULO SANTIAGO,GEORGE R. 03 11 90 2 02 71 87 2 SANTIAGO SANORA 02 71 88 1 ~~-------- SEVIER, MILOREO M. SILGUERO, PETER SMALLEY ROYAL OE LEON 02 17 88 1 02 81 83 2 -- --~-- 02 01 57 l ~- STANTON,GAITHA STERN, HEDWIG L. 01 94 23 2 02 12 31 1 STOCKER1SHARON 01 47 91 2 . ~-,.___~------- . STONE,FRANK 00 80 54 2 SULLIVAN1ROBERT L. 03 01 27 l - 60 30 30 26 31 10 60 26 10 60 30 30 lt2 60 60 _--~~~~-~----'TAYLOR,RONALO THOMPSON, ERNEST M. 00 60 24 1 26 31 10 -~-------- ___.,_ 01 69 07 1 26 40 10 - - 02128110 03/31/70 0-3/-31/70 03/31/70 - 03/31/70 03/31/70 03/31/70 136.96 22.95 19.50 20.50 2.00 10.00 44.50 107.20 902.55 417. ltO / 8, 100.00 15.30 29.40 ---- 98.90 92.30 8.50 75.00 ~- -~-- - 129.15 290.68 30.25 --~-- 11.50 212.35 55.00 522.88 46,782.62 PAGE-- 5 ~ OE LE TEO 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/-70- ------ 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 ;:;u Pu;: ;ea ;ea a e ;w4 0 44 & Ci a: PS a a a 22 52 a I 2 El I I ! a us: ; a ,: s : a a a,; a 5 2 5 ; a 2 a I 2 SI I a a . . - - - SANTA BARBARA INDIGENT AtCOUNTS DELETED FROM MASTERFILE GENERAL HOSPITAL~-----~~ - ~~~~--,,.~--- MONTH ENDING 09/30/70 --PAYCOOECS) --- LAST BILLING TIPPETTE,MILORED -~----~-~--TRUJILLO, DOMITILA ---~-----.,._.,---W=E=B=E=R:,J OAV~l~O-=LE~E~-----.__~-~-- WELCH,ARTHUR J. WILLIAMS,ROXANNE 00 11 65 l 01 72 86 1 00 68 31 2 02 65 60 1 02 38 14 2 60 60 ll 26 10 30 WINKLER JAKE ----------- 01 24 5-6 -l -- 26 10 YARNELL,EMMA OEELIS YSARRA,GUADALUPE ------~--~----- ZAHNISER,B_E_S_S~~--'""-'---'--'-----~ 02 65 46 1 01 65 90 2 01 02 20 l NO.INDIGENT ACCOUNTS DELETED THIS MONTH - 30 60 60 134 , 12/26/69 03/31/70 03/31/70 03/31/70 03/31/70 03/31/70 03/31/70 02/28/70 03/20/70 50,582.82 'r ACCT.BALANCE ~~ 390.20 702.70 17.25 622.00 19.90 f' 1,388.90 427.35 10.20 ' 221.10 50t 582. 82 ' r I -- PAG~ 6. DE LE TEO 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 09/30/70 I ' Reconm. Co. Counsel * Ins. Carr . for denial Claims Again t. Co. for Alleged damages. / , Approv. Request for Waiver of Phys.Req. for Prospective Employee. I , ~ Filing by Sta. Ma ria Clk. of 2 copies Ord. 746 an Boundary Map Annex. #58, Sander Mobilehome Park. I; Claim of Mrs. Betty Maersk Agst. Co. for Property Damages. / November 16, 1970 1"iuditor' s No . 47 == Santa Barbara General Hos pital and provi e medical staff . Add . avings have ' Transfer $336 . 00 Equipment . communicat com sy er of funds reresulted from purchases . Expenditure o Structures and Improvements to 159- The C-2 sub- object X- Ray'' -- A provi ice sub- object . em No . requests 11 for the purc1a tercoms, now t his item.be purchased under ipment ' No difference in tot:al dollars . In the Matter of Recommendations from County Counsel and County ' s Insurance Carrier for U~nial of Certain Claims Against the County for Alleged Damages . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant , and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the following claims against the County for alleged damages be, and the same are hereby , denied, as recommended by the County Counsel and the County ' s insurance carrier: / 1) Willard Brown - $99,00 . r2) Steven Imhoff = $1,000,000.00 13) A. J . Phillips = $971.00 In the Matter of Approving Request for Waiver of Physical Requirements for Prospective Employee, Auditor-Controller . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell , seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the request for a waiver of the physical requirements for the following prospective employee be, and the same is hereby approved, as recommended by Dr . David Caldwell: Caroline Berta, Account Clerk In the Matter of Filing by Santa Maria City Clerk of Two Copies of Ordinance No . 746 and Boundary Map for Annexation No . 58 (Sander Mobilehome Park) and Resolution No . 3085 Withdrawing Same from Santa Barbara County Protection District . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that two copies of Ordinance No . 746 and Boundary Map for Annexation No . 58 (Sander Mobi lehome Park) and Resolution No . 3085 withdrawing same from Santa Barbara County Fire Protection District be, and the same are hereby, accepted for filing from the Santa Maria City Clerk In the Matter of Claim of Mrs . Betty Maersk Against the County for Alleged Property Damages in an Unknown Amount . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried ananimously, it is ordered that the above- entitled claim be, and the same is hereby, referred to the County Counsel for referral to the County ' s i nsurance carri er. 277 278 Oil Well Dr illg. Bond. / Approval of Release of Oi Well Drill&. Bond. I November 16, 1970 In t he Matter of Oil Well Drilling Bond , Pursuant t o the reques t of the County Petroleum Engineer, and in accordance with the provisions contained in Ordinance No . 1927 ; Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unaP i mously , it is ordered that the following oil well drilling bond be, a d the same is hereby , approved: Robert G. Russell - Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, Bond No. 395'S631, covering well ''Stendel No . 6-24'' , County Permit No . 2230. In the Matter of Approval of Release of Oil Well Drilling Bond . Pursuant to the request of County Petroleum Engineer, and in accordance with the provisions contained in Ordinance No . 1927; Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell , seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously , it is ordered that the following oil well drilling bond be , and the same is hereby, released as to all future acts and conditions : Wood-Callahan Oil Company - Bond No . 7238576 , formerly firm of Les-Cal Company & Wood. Fidel ity Deposit Company of Mar yland Approval of In t be ?'Wtter of Approval of Riders to Oil Well Drilling Bonds . Riders to Oil Well Drill&. Pursuant to the request of t~e County Petroleum Engineer, and in accord- Bonds. I Publication o Ord. 4fo2127 I ance with the provisions contai ned in Ordinance No . 1927; Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell , seconded by Supervisor Grant , and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the following riders to oil well drilli ng bonds be, and the same are hereby, approved: 1) Shell Oil Company - The Travelers Indemnity Company , rider to Blanket Bond No . S-305 covering following wells : Thomas 1 - Per mit 3506 Thomas 2 - Permit 3507 Thomas 3 - Permit 3508 Thomas 4 - Permit 3509 Careaga B-4 - Permit 3510 Careaga B-5 - Permit 3511 2) Texaco I nc. - The Travelers Indemnity Company . rider to Blanket Bond No . T-393 covering well ''{'1 . P. Hammon Fee 'B' '' (NCT-2) 1114, County Permit No . 3505 In the Matter of Publication of Ordinance No . 2127 It appearing from the Affidavit of Publication of the Principal Clerk of the Santa Maria Times tha t Ordinance No . 2127 has been published in t he manner and form required by law; Upon motion duly seco ded, and carried unanimously, it is determined that said Ordinance No . 2127 has been published in the manner end f orm required by law \ Reports ~ Connunications. / CoDDnunication f rom Planng. Co111D. for Informatn. Only. / Resolutn. in Memorium, Clarence H. Schutte. I November 16, 1970 In the Matter of Reports and Communications . , The following reports and communications were received by the Board and ordered placed on file: Only . / l) Notice of Hearing before PUC on application of John F . and Donna B. Blakemore to Secure Private Roadway Crossing, December 15 , 1970 at 10 a .m. , Mural Room, Courthouse Bldg., Santa Barbara . 2) / Califor nia Secretary of State - Certi ficates of Filing for Annexat i on of Tract 10,699, Unit 3 , t o County Service Ar ea No . 3, and Annexation ,of NE Corner of U. s . 101 and Padaro Lane to County Service Area No . 111 Atlantic-Richfield . In t he Matter of Communication from Planning Commission for I nformation The followi ng communication from t he Planning Commission was r eceived by the Board for information only and ordered placed on file: 11) Granted Conditional Use Permit on request of Ray Byers (70-CP-63) to permit construction of multiple dwellings in an R-2 District on property located oh the north side of , North Jameson Lane, approximately 600 feet west of Sheffield Drive, Montecito . In the Matter of Resolution i n Memorium, Clarence H. Schutte. Upon motion of Supervisbr Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, t he following resolution was passed and adopted: RES QLIIT ION NQ. 70-696 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) Cormnents ~ Welcome In the Matter of Introductory Comments and Welcome by Board of Superby Bd. of Superviso s. Youth in Govt. visors on Youth i n Government Conference . Confer ence. 1 Clifford C. Romer, Chief Probation Officer, made i ntroductory comments before a group of studeLts from all t he high schools i n the County, and briefed them on the events of t he day for the Conference . He i ntroduced all the County department heads present as a group . Each Supervisor was introduced by t he Chairman who, in turn, gave a brief s t atement, to the end that it is hoped that the third annual Youth i n Government Conference will prove highly successful . The original purpose and intent of t his program was to try to bring young people throughout the County to the County Seat for a two - day program in order to try to give them a better knowledge, understanding and appreciation of County government . There is the l ack of understanding today between the generations and this program is an attempt for the County to alleviate that lack of understanding and bring about a oetter rel ationship . Chairman Clyde thanked Clifford c. Romer, Chairman of the Conference, and the staff , for their efforts in coordinating all the details for t he Conference . 279 -- ~- - -~ ----~------- ----=--=---------------- -~------~-------------~~----------- 280 Accept. of Rig t of Way Grant from Transamer ca Title Co. for Extension of Cathedral Rd. / Pl~nng. Comm. Recomm. on Alleged Violaui. of Conditions by Oilfield Waste Dump Go. I Planng. Comm. Recomm. to Approve Req. of Robert J. Maden to Per - mi t operati on of Child Day Care Center a Riven Rock Rd. it Para Grande Lane,Montecit . I November 16, 1970 In the Matter of Acceptance of Right of Way Grant from Transamerica Title Company for Extension of Cathedral Oaks Road, Project No . 3026 .1 , Third Supervisorial District, in Consideration of $8,7000. 00 . Leland R. Steward, Road Commissioner, explained that this is a follow-up to part of the terms of the agreement executed by the Board on August 31, 1970 for road right of way across the Bishop Ranch being the extension of Cathedral Oaks Road between Los Carneros Road and Glen Annie Road . He said Donald Frary, District Manager of the Southern California Edison Company, feels that this is a type of item that is not in concept with the County franchise - it is restrictive which precludes them from doing their normal business While this is not the first time there has been this type of restrictive right of way given to the County and accepted, it is the first time this has been questioned by a utility company. , although i nformal over the telephone . Mr . Steward recommended subject right of way grant be acc~pted by the County and if there is a legal adjustment required to be made it can be taken up separately at a later time . Miss Susan Trescher, Deputy County Counsel, explained that the agreement provides for contingency liability because the plans of the Edison Company along the road are unknown. If the lines were to go underground, there might be County liability . However, the right of way is only pursuant to the agreement which has already been executed. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and c arried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, continued to Monday, November 23, 1970. In the Matter of Planning Commission Recommendation on Alleged Violation of Conditions by Oilfield Waste Dump Company (70-V-18) Generally Located 5 Miles North of U. S. Highway 101 on South Side of Cat Canyon Road, Cat Canyon Area. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the s ame is hereby, continued to Monday, November 30, 1970 to allow time for the committee to meet with Western Oil & Gas Association. In the Matter of Planning Commission Recommendation to Approve Request of Robert J . Maden (70~CP-61) for Conditional Exceptiqn under Ordinance No . 453 to Permit Operation of Child Day Care Center at 705 Riven Rock Road and 680 Para Grande Lane, Montecito, a Third Annual Renewal . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the recommendation of the Planning Commission to approve the request of Robert J . Maden (70-CP-61) for a Conditional Exception under Section lO'(b) and the l-E-1 District Classifications of Ordinance No . 45Y t o permit operation of a child day care center on Assessor's Parcel No . 11-130-14, located on the southeast corner of Para Grande .Lane and Riven Rock Road, known as 705 Riven Rock Road and 680 Par a Grande Lane, Montecito, be and the same is hereby, confirmed, subject to the following conditions: I - Planng. Comm. Recomm. for Approv. Req. of Tadao Tanak to approve use of trailer as employee dwellg. Linden Ave. Carpinteria. I Allew. of Positions, ~ Disallow. fixg. of Compensation Mo. Sal. Positions. I 1) 2) November 16, 1970 Compliance with recormnendations of the County Health DepartmePt memorandum of April 23, 1968, as follows: a) Applicant shall obtain a v alid permit from the County Health Department to operate a food establishment . Compliance with recommendations of Montecito Fire Protection District letter of Apri l 29, 1968, as follows: a) b) c) None of the children shall play or sleep in any of the rooms above the first floor . A 2-1/2 gallon fire extinguisher shall be placed in the area where the children are to be housed . A second exit with clear access from the children' s area shall be provided. 3) This permit shall expire one (1) year from and after date of i ssuance. 4) The Maximum number of children s hall .not exceed six (6) . 5) There shall be no weekend activity or overnight care . 6) The hours of operation shall be limited to weekdays from 8:00 a .m. to 5:30 p .m. 7) The ages of the children to be cared for shall be from two (2) years to six (6) years . 8) The play area shall be fenced in. 9) No violation of Ordinance No . 453 shall exist at any time or during the period covered by this permit . 10) The Welfare Department license shall be revised to reflect Conditions 4, 5 and 7 above . 11) There shall be no public advertising property soliciting enrollment . or signs on t he \ In the Matter of Planning Commission Recoamendation f or Approval of Request of Tadao Tanaka (70-V-61) for Conditional Exception under Ordinance No . 661 to Permit Use of Trailer as Nursery Employee Dwelling at 1505 Linden Avenue, Carpinteria Valley . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant , seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and c arried unanimously, it is ordered that the recommendation of the Planning Commission for approval of request of Tadao Tanaka (70-V-61X for a Conditional . Exception under provisions of Article X, Section 4 and the A-1-X-O District Classification of Ordinance No . 661 to permit the use of a trailer as nursery employee dwelling, Assessor ' s Parcel No . 3-070-35, located on t he west side of Linden Avenue, southwesterly from the junction of Foothill Road, and known as 1505 Linden Avenue, Carpinteria Valley be, and the same is hereby, confirmed, on the basis of prior action on similar requests in the area In the Matter of Allowance of Positions, Disallowance of Positions, and Fixing of Compensation for Monthly Salaried Positions . (Public Defender, Effective December 1, 1970) Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and c arried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO . 70-697 (ORIG-INAL IN PERMANENT FILE) ~ 281 a86c 282 Recomm.of Men l Health Adv.Bd. on Incentive Allowance in Hirin& Biling 1 Persons. / November 16 , 1970 In the Matter of Recommendation of Mental Health Advisory Board on I ncentive Allowance in Hiring Bilingual Persons . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the Admini strative Officer and Personnel Officer Com.minication In the Matter of Communication from Santa Ynez Valley Planning and f rem Santa Yn z Valley Planng. Zoning Committee in Support of Deni al of Permits to Sell Commodities from Vehicles ec Zon'g Coum.i Suppor t of De ial in the Commercial Area of a l'own. (Canella) of Permits te Sell Commodit es Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell , and f rom Vehicles in Commercial carried unnnimously, it i s order ed that subj ect communication be, and the same area of a / town. is hereby , placed on file n. In the Matter of Recommendation of Administrative Officer on Requests to Fill Vacant Positions . Recomm. of A Off. n Req. te fill vacan positions i Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously , i t is or der ed t hat t he recommendation of t he Admi ni str ative Officer to f~ll the followi ng vacant positions be , and the same is hereby, conf i rmed, as follows; effective forthwith or as otherwise indicated : Safety & Transportation Officer-Working Capital Fund: Automotive Body Man #220 . 0975 .001 Automotive Mechanic #220 . 0980.002 County Clerk - Gerer al Fund : Extra Help (Typist Clerk) Welfare Department - General Fund: Clerk #155. 1480 . 03, . 10, .11 Typist Clerk 41155. 7160 . 02, 05, 06, 07, .15 I ntermediate Typist Clerk #155. 3400. 18 , . 19, . 21, . 26 Senior Typist Clerk #155. 6280.03 Eligibility Worker Trainee #155 . 2612 . 24 Extra Help - Clerk Extra Help - Typist Clerk Petroleum Department - Petroleum Fund: Extra Help (Clerk-Typist) County Clerk - General Fund: Typist Clerk #02. County Clerk - Elections - General Fund: I ntermediate Clerk #02. 3360.02 . Fire Departmer t - General Fund: (Effective December 4, 1970) Admi nistrative Aide #110. 0060 .01 Tax Collector - Gener al Fund: Extra Help Municipal Court - Gener al Fund: (Effective Oct. 29, 1970) Typist Clerk # 76 . 7160 . 08 Public Works - Maintenance Division - General Fund: Maintenance Electrician #36. 3960 .04 Road Department - Road Furd: Signal Maintenance Man #140. 6495 . 01 Sr. Ergireering Technician #140. 5740 .06 ' Cancellation of Contract btw Co. ef S.B. Aaron O. Case, dba Case Detective Agcy. I Req. of Dir. Personnel for Approv. of Independ . Civil Serv. System fer Co. I Appeintmt. of Mr . Robt. F. Gre&an City Admin. of Santa Maria te S.B.Co. Air Pell - tion Centrol Dis . Rules Regulation Cenm. I November 16, 1970 Mental Healt h Services - General Fund: S r~ . Typist Clerk #151 . 6280 . 02 . Municipal Court - General Fund: (Effective Nov . 9, 1970) Extra Help (Typist-Clerk) Public Defender - General Fund: (Effective Dec. 1, 1970) Clerk-Typist #17. 7160 .01 Sheriff-Coroner - General Fund: (Effective Dec . 1, 1970) Clerk-Typist #90.7160 .17. , .01 Sheriff-Coroner - Gener al Fund: Dispatcher Clerk #90.5200.05 In the Matter of Cancellation of .Contract between the County of Sant a Barbara and Aaron O. Case, dba Case Detective Agency , t o Provide for Uniformed & Trai n.ed Patrol Officer Services at Times and Places Designated by the Administrative Officer and Sheriff-Coroner. The Administrative Officer submitted a written recommendation on sub- ject matter to give notice of termination of contract effective November 20, 1970, as requested by the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court. If after fiurther evaluation, service is to be continued, the service can be reinstated or bid as necessary . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the contract between the County of Santa Barbara and Aaron o. Case, dba Case Detective Agency, dated November 9, 1970, to provide for uniformed trained patrol officer services at times and places designated by the Administrative Officer and Sheriff-Coroner by, and the . same is hereby, cancelled effective November 20, 1970, as recommended by the Administrative Officer . It is further ordered that 5-day written notice be given to Aaron O. Case of subject c ancellation' , as provided for in the contract . In the Matter of Request of Director of Personnel for Approval of I ndependent Civil Service System for the County with Assistance from State Merit System. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Director of Personnel be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to secure assistance from the State Merit System and approval for an independent, approved Civil Service System for Santa Barbara County which wili qualify the County to operate outside the State Merit System and continue eligibility for Federal funds particularly in the Health and Welfare Departments . In the Matter of Appointment of Mr . Robert F . Grogan, City Admi nistrator of the City of Santa Maria to Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District Rules and Regulations Committee . 283 - - ~ ---~--,-,.--,----,----,-----------------------.,.------------------.,.------ 284 Award&. Bid f Transfer Sta. Rd. Repair ii Improvmts.S.B. I Repo r t ii Reco from Read Ce en Req. ef Pr operty Owne s fer Abandonmt Pertion of Refuaie Rd. I November 16, 1970 Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that Mr. Robert F. Grogan, City Administrator of the City of Santa Maria be, and he is hereby, appointed to the Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District Rules and Regulations Committee In the Matter of Awardi ng Bid for Transfer Station Road Repair and Improvements, .Santa Barbara. The Affidavit of Publication bei ng on file with the Clerk, the following bids were opened at a meeting held on November 12, 1970; the roll was called, and representatives of the following departments were present: County Counsel, Public Works; and J . E. Lewis, Clerk: Jerry Howard Const. Jim Cushman E. H. Haskell C. W. Berry Const. Sully-Miller Const. Co . Base Bid Alt . C Add Base Bid Alt. A Add Alt . B Add Alt . C Add Base Bid Alt . A Add Alt . B Add Alt . C Add Base Bid Alt . A Add Alt . B Add Alt . C Add Base Bid Alt . A Add Alt . B Add Alt . C Add $19,877 6,250 $19,722 10,929 11,264 9,864 $18,888 9,500 9,000 7,000 $17,348 7,530 6,902. 50 7,170 . 25 $18,632 7,622 8,400 7,800 Following referral to the County Counsel and Public Works Director, a written report and recommendation was submitted by the Public Works Director to award the contract to C. W. Berry Construction Company, Inc . , 4157 State Street, Santa Barbar a , California, the low bidder, for base bid of $17,348 plus Alternate B for $6,902. 50 The engineer's estimate was $18,200 base bid, Alternate A $9,300, Alternate B $8,300, and Alternate C $6,800. It appearing that the bid of C. W. Berry Construction is the lowest and best bid received from a responsible bidder, and that said bid is satisfactory and in accordance i;qith the notice inviting bids for said project; Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the bid of C. W. Berry Construction Co., in the amount of $24,250. 50 - base bid of $17,348 plus Alternate B $6,902.50 be accepted, and that the contract for said project be awarded to the said contractor from Account 152 B 10 at the price and upon the terms and conditions set forth in said bid and in said notice inviting bids In the Matter of Report and Recommendation from Road Commissioner on Request of Property Owners for Abandonment of Portion of Refugio Road Right of Way Lying b~tween Roblar Avenue and State Route 154. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject natter be , and same is hereby, referred to the Planning Commission for hearing, report and recommendation prior to the setting of a public hearing by the Board. ReceDID. gf Read Cenm. for Appr eval ef S11mma ry of Pr oceedgs. ef Traff c En&. CoDID. Mtg. ef 0 4, 1970. Executn. ef Agr eemt btw. S.B.Ce. i Sant Mar ia Public Air per Dist. re Fester Rd. Executn. of Amend.mt. to Agreemt btw S.B.Ce. Child ren's Protective Se (Held Harmless Clause). I Petition Req. Adequate Lightina System in Andamar Park Better Patro Serv. btw Cathedral aks Rd. e rkeley Rd. I Cmmunicatien from Mrs. Allen Bozarth en Preblem Arising frem Draina&e Ditch Borders. Prop. at 275 Butter fly Lane, Menteci.to. I November 1'6 , 1970 In the Matter. of Recommendation of Road Commissio1.er for Approval of Summary of Pcoceedings of Traffic Engineer ing Committee Meeting of November 4, 1970 . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, anc carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject recommendation be , a~d t he same is hereby , confirmed , with the exception of Item No . 10-7 regarding the speed limit on Cathedral Oaks Road, Third Supervisorial District . In the Matter of Execution of Agreeme t between the County of Santa Barbara ard Santa Maria Public Airport District for Widening, Improving and Maintaining Foster Road, Fift~ Supervisorial District . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, ard carried unanimously, t he following resolution was passed and adopted authorizing the Chairman and Clerk to execute subject agreement : RESOLUTION NO . 70-698 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Execution of Amendment to Agreement between the County of Santa Barbara and Children ' s Protective Society (Hold Harmless Clause) . Mrs . E. Pike, a Director of the Society, read from a prepared progress report for this program, which was ordered placed on file . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted, authorizing the Chairman and Clerk to execute said Pgreement Amendment : RESOLTUION NO . 79-699 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Petition Requesting Adequate Lighting System in Andamar Park, and Better Patrol Service between C ~ t hedral Oaks Road and Berkeley Road, Third Supervisorial Dis trict . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried u~1animously , it is ordered that subject petition conta.ining s ome 200 signatures be , ard the same is hereby, referred to the Park Director on the park matter , and t he Sheriff regarding patrol service . In the Matter of Cormnunication from Mrs . Allen Bozarth on Problem Arising from Drainage Ditch bordering Property at 275 Butterfly Lane, Montecito . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be ,. and t he same is hereby, referred to the Flood Control Engineer and Road Commissisoner, and tha t she be so notified RecellDl. ef Ne. Ce. In the Matt er of Recommendation of North County Coordinating Council rdinati. Ceuncil fer Mental Reta d- for Mental Retardation for Appointment of Citizens Committee to Study and ation Citizens e Study * Resolve Resolve Problems or Facilities to Care for Retarded ~nd Emotionally Handicapped . Pr eblems on Facilit es. I 285 286 Supervi s or Fl oyd McCall ltr reg Smog "Life-Saving Time" Progra ( Req. from CSA for Respsonse en New Crisis m Fed. Parti cipation in Welfare Ad11in Costs. I Req . for Appr Cancellation Revision of Funds. I p. ' r November 16, 1970 Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be , and the same is hereby , referred to the Planning Director with t he request to cont act t hese people and to explain to t hem the procedures being used now as to the issuance of conditional use permits, variances, rezonings, to see whether or not t his can be resolved In the Matter of Communication from Riverside County Supervisor Floyd McCall, 5th District on Factors Causing Smog with Recommendations to Reduce Smog, ''Life-Saving Time'' Program. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered tha t subject matter be , and t he s ame is hereby, referred to the Air Pollution Control Committee. In t he Matter of Request from CSAC for Response on New Crisis in Federal Participation i n Welfare Admi nistrative Costs . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and c arried unanimously, it is ordered that t he Clerk be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to transmit a telegram to Congressman Teague, and U. S. Senators Murphy and Cranston on behalf of the Board urging their continued assistance to remove limitations on Federal participation in the local costs of welfare administration. of Funds . The Board re~essed until 2 o ' clock, Vm At 2 o ' clock, p .m. , the Board reconvened . Present: Supervisors George H. Clyde, Daniel 9. Grant, and Curtis Tunnell , and J . E. Lewis, Clerk. a Absent: Supervisors Joe J . Callahan and Francis H,. Beattie . Supervisor Clyde in t he Chair In the Natter of Requests for Appropriation, Cancellation or Revision Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and c arried unanimously, t he following requests for appropriation, cancellation or revision of funds are hereby approved, in the budget classificat ions and amounts shown, and t he Audit~r be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to make the necessary transfers: REQUEST FOR APPROPRIATION, CANCELLATION OR REVISION OF FUNDS ' Auditor ' s No . 46 Transfer of moneys from the General Fund, the Road Fund, the Petroleum Department Fund, t he Transportation Working Capital Fund , t he Flood Control and Water Conservation Fund, and the Laguna Sanitary District Fund to the Employee's Retirement Fund for Retirement Contributions in t he sum of $ 190,995 .16 . Auditor ' s No . 47 - - Santa Barbara General Hospital Request for Budget Deviation t o purchase additional equipment and provide Nymatic dictating communication for additional member of medical staff . Addition to intercom system. No. transfer of funds required as savings have resulted from purchases . Expenditure of $190 .00 Ord. #2135 Amendng Sec. 6 " 24 of Ord. #2128 - Co.Salary Ord. I Hear&s . en Plann. Cemm. " A&ricultura Preserve Advis.Comm. Recemm t Approve Req. for Amendmt. t e Art. IV ef Ord. 661 to Rezone Prept in Cuyama,Santa Mar Sisquec,Lempec " Guadalupe " Creation ef A&r Preserves. ' November 16, 1970 Auditor ' s No . 48 -- Santa Berbara Hospital Transfer $336. 00 from 159-C-2 Structures and Improvements to 159-C-l Equipment . The C-2 sub-object provided by item No . 11 for the purchase of ''Intercoms, X-Ray'' - - Auditor ' s Office now requests this item be purchased under the C-1 Equipment sub- object No difference in total dollars . In the Matter of Ordinance No . 2135 - An Ordi nance of the County of Sant a Berbar~ . A~ending SectioD 6 and Section 24 of Ordinence No . 2128 , as Amended, being the Salary Ordinance of the County of Santa Barbara (S alary of District ~t torney Est ablished at $28 ,000 Effective Janu~ry 4, 1971 . ) . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and c arried unanimously, the Board passed and adopted Ordinance No . 2135 of the County of Sant a Barbar a , entitled ''An Ordinance of the County of Santa Barba ra Amending Sectior 6 and Section 24 of Ordinance No . 2128 as Amended being t he Salary Ordinance of the County of Santa Barbar a . ' ' Upon the roll being cal led, the following Supervisors voted Aye , to-wi t: George H. Clyde , Daniel G. Grant, and Curtis Tunnell . NOES: None . ABSENT: J oe J . Callahan and Francis H. Beattie . In the Matter of Hearings on Planning Commission and Agricultural Preserve Advisory Connnittee Recommendations to Approve Requests for Amendment to Article IV of Ordinance No . 661 t o Rezone Certain Properties in Cuyama, Santa Maria, Sisquoc, Lompoc and Guadalupe Areas; and Creation of Agricultural Preserves . This being the date and time set for hearings on subject proposals; 1 the Affidavit of Publication being on file with the Clerk. Mrs . C. Eggert made a statement indicating her concern over so much acreage going into preserves, and Supervisor Tunnell explained that most of them have supported the concept on the basis that it will be in the best interest of all the people - the small home o~'1tler and l arger ones . Agriculture must be kept in business and many ranchers could not stay in business under the old system. The Assessor gave an estimate that if all the land in the County eligible for agriculture preserves were to go into a preserve, it would mean a reduction in assessed valuation of about 5-1/2% but not all will do this, so the reduction would be more like 3-1/2% to 4%. The Board is encouraging open spaces or ranches and farms to stay in that business . There being no further appearances or written statements submitted for or against subject proposal; 287 I 288 Ord. //:21 36 Amend&. Or d. 1661. I Hearngs. on P Cemm. it Agric Preserve Adv. Comm. Recomm. to Approve Applicationa for Creation of Agric. Preserves. I November 16 , 1970 Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, end ca rried unanimously, it is ordered t hat tne recommendations of t he Planni ng ~ Commission and Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee to approve t he f ollowing requests to adopt an ordinance amending Prticle IV of Ordinance No . 661 of the County of Santa Barbara, as amended, to rezone properties for agricultural preserves be, and the same are hereby, confirmed, as follows, on the basis that they conform to the County General Plan, and the Board passed and adopted the following ordinance: / 1) John T. Rickard on behalf of Spanish Ranch, Cuyama (70-RZ- 67), to rezone from ''U'' to 100-AG District Classification, per Planning Commission Resolution No . 70-98. / 2) John T. Rickard on behalf of Rinconada Ranch, Cuyama (70- RZ - 67) to rezone from ''U'' to 100-AG District Classification, per Planning Commission Resolution No. 70-98. / 3) Gilio DeBernardi (70-AP-44A), Lompoc, to rezone from 10-AG to 40-AG District Classification, per Planning Commission Resolution No . 70- 103. / 4) Gilio DeBernardi (70-AP-44B), Lompoc, to rezone from "U" to 100-AG District Classification, per Planning Commission Resolution No . 70- 103. / 5) John Gill, Bank of America NT&SA on behalf of William A Rennie Trus t (70 - RZ - 76), Lompoc, to rezone from 20-AG to 100-AG District Classificat ion, per Planning Commission Resolution No . 70-104. / 6) Stella Lanini (70-RZ- 77), Guadalupe, to rezone from ''U'' to 40-AG District Classification, per Planning Commission Resolution No . 70- 107. In the Matter of Ordinance No . 2136 - an Ordinance Amending Ordi nance No . 661 of the County of Sant a Barbara, as Amended, by Adding Section 659 to Article IV of Said Ordinanc e . Upon the roll being called, the following Supervi sors voted Aye, to-wit : George H. Clyde , Daniel G. Grant, and Curtis Tunnell . NOES: None . ABSENI': Joe J . Callahan and Francis H. Beattie. ann. In the Matter of Hearings on Planning Commission and Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee Recommendations to Approve Applications for Creation of Agricultural Preserves in Cuyama, Santa Mar ia , Sisquoc, Lompoc and Guadalupe Areas . Thi s being the date and time set for hearings on Planning Commissi on and Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee recommendations to approve applications for creat ion of Agricultural Preserves ; the Affidavit of Publication being on file with the Clerk; and there being no appearances or written statements for or against subject proposal; Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the recommendat ions of the PlaPning Commi ssion and Agricultural Preserve Advisory Committee to approve the following applications for creation of agricultural preserves under the provisions of Ececution of Short Form Land Conserv. Contrt for Creation of A&ric. Preserve November 16, 1970 In the Matter of Execution of Short Form Land Conservation Contracts for Creation of Agricultural Preserves . Upon motior of Supervisor Tunnell , seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, the following resolutions were passed and adopted authorizing the execution of subject contracts: / Resolution No . 70 - 700A, Spanish Ranch (70-AP-40), Cuyama . / Resolution No . 70- 700B, Rinconada Ranch (70-AP-41), Cuyama. " Resolution No . 70- 700C, De Bernardi (70-AP- 44A), Santa Maria . 1 Resolution No . 70- 700D, De Bernardi (70-AP-44B) , Santa Maria. / Resolution No . 70- 700E, Rennie (70-AP- 47), Lompoc . / Resolution No . 70 - 700F, Lanini (70-AP- 48), Guadalupe . (ORIGINAL RESOLUTIONS IN PERMANENT FILE) ~ 289-A Creatin of Agric. Preserves. Ececution ef A&reemt. btw S B. Ce. * Missien Canye Fire Dist.Sta.#15. L Accept. of Right ef Way Grant f rem Samuel Eileen M. De La Cuesta fer Alamo Pintade R I Hearni. en Appeal Hope Ranch Realty Investmt. Ce. from Conditns. re lot split fill, 230. I November 16, 1970 Chapter 1443, Statutes of 1965, known as the California Lai d Conservation Act, from a land use standpoint be, and the same are hereby, confirmed, on the basis that they conform to the criteria established by the Board of Supervisors of Santa Barbara County; and the Board passed and adopted the following resolution: In the Matter of Creation of Agricultural Preserves . RESOLUTION NO . 70 - 700 {ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) / l) John T. Rickard on behalf of Spa~ ish Ranch, Cuyama (70-AP- 40) . 1 2) John T. Rickard on behalf of Rinconada Ranch, Cuyama (70-AP- 41) . ~) Gilio DeBernardo, Lompoc (70-AP- 44A) . / 4) Gilio DeBerPardo, Lompoc (70-AP-44B) . 1.5) John Gill, Bank of America NT&SA on behalf of William A Rennie Trust (70-AP-47), Lompoc . 6) Stella Lanini, Guadalupe (70-AP-48) . t .SEE PAGE 289-A FOR RESOLUTIONS NO . 70 - 700A THROUGH 70 - 700F . In the Matter of Execution of Agreement between the County of Sant a Barbara and Mission Canyon Fire District for County Maintenance, Equipment and Operation of S. B. County Fire Station No . 15 duri ng FY 1970-71 at Cost of $16,539. 00 . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seco. nded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted authorizing the Chairman and Clerk to execute subject agreement: BESO~lJIION NQ , 70-701 (ORIGI NAL IN PERMANENT FILE} In the Matter of Acceptance of Right of Way Grant from Samuel and Eileen M. De La Cuesta for Alamo Pintado Road, Third Supervisorial District. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Right of Way Grant, dated November 13, 1970 from Samuel De La Cuesta and Eileen M. De La Cuesta be , and the same is hereby, accepted by the County of Santa Barbara for Alamo Pintado Road, Third Supervisorial District, without monetary consideration; and the Clerk be , and he is hereby, authorized and directed to record said documer t in the office of the Santa Barbara County Recorder. In the Matter of Hearing on Appeal of Hope Ranch Realty Investment Company from Conditions Imposed by Planning Commission on October 21, 1970 Relative to Lot Split #11,230. This being the date and time set for hearing on subject proposal; written notification having been given the appellant, Planning Commission, Subdivision Committee, and County Counsel; The report of the Planning Commissior from the meeting of October 21, 1970 , indicated the action to deny the appeal of Co.dition #2 relative to the 289 290 - -- - ---------- -- - - -------~------- - --- -----~---~ - --- ----------------- --~-- - ' ' November 16, 1970 Health Department ' s requirement for percolation tests on the basis that to not require a soil percolation test prior to recordation would not provide sufficient notice for a prospective purchaser . . The communication from J0hn C. Vesey, President of the Hope Ranch Realty I nvestment Company, was read by the Clerk, which indicated the appe al was on the basis that the percolation tests be dorre prior to obtaining a construction permit In the p-8st , r5:e1veral- 'aevelopments in Hope Ranch Park have been done with this proviso . - . Donald Detwiler of the Health Department pointed out that their concern at first was the matter of suspected underground seepage and the conditions were . written up with that in mind. Since then, investigation shows that the properties known to have seepage problems are southerly and westerly of this particular parcel . It might be well to consider the original requirement with one change to s ay, in effect, that prior to occupancy a performance test be conducted on the system as installed . The notice to the buyer or seller regarding the requirement could be made clear when the lot s plit is recorded. It could be picked up in the title report . Mr . Detwiler mentioned how they had recently worked out somethi ng with the Building Depa r t ment whereby t here would be the requirement to have an engineers ys tem installed prior to issuing a permit for the house . In the problem areas this system should be installed subject to a performance test satisfactory to the Building Department . John Vesey i ndicated he was in agreement with the proposed change . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Condition #2 relat ive to the Health Department ' s requirement be, and the same is hereby, amended in that a performance test be required with results s atisfactory to the Building Department prior to occupancy of any development on these parcels . Also, that the County Counsel prepare an agreement which would be recorded and be reflected .in the title report as being a method of notifying the purchaser that a performance test will be required. Hearng. en In the Matter of Hearing on Appeal of Herman W. Caylin and Bill Appeal ef Herman W.Cay1.~ Marchiando (7Q-RZ - 78) for Adoption of Ordinance Amending Article IV of Ordi nance Bill Marchi de. Te Rezone Pr No . 661 to Rezone Property Generally Located l/Sth Mi le West of Ballard Canyon in Selvan1. ; Road and 1-1/2 Miles North from Chalk Hill Road,Solvang, from 20 -AG to 5-AG District Classification. ' This being the date and time set for hearing on subject appeal; the Affidavit of Publication being on file with the Clerk; A communication was read by the Clerk from the Santa Ynez Valley Planning and Zoning Committee who had discussed the matter of rezoning and trailer permi ts in the Ball ard Canyon area. At the Committee meeting of October 26, 1970, it was decided that this request was inappropriate and that if the Planning Commission decision is not upheld that the matter be returned to the Commission for modification and review. November 16 , 1970 Edward W. and Joanne T. Rife submitted a letter i n opposition to the proposed change i n zoning as the avai lability of water in the area is questionable; the property is in a remote area that will not see water service for some time; the nearby five- acre zoning has not yet been developed; access to the ar ea is via a dirt road impassable duringthe r ainy season; and the propert y is in close proximity to a chicken r anch with its associated odor and fly problems . The Planni ng Commission submit ted its Zoning Report, dated November 4, 1970, showing the unanimous decision t o deny t he r eques t on t he basi s that t he t opography of the area is not suitable for unrestricted 5-acre development; and a better indic ation of possible development, if rezoned, is needed. Arguments in favor and in oppositi on were spelled out H. H. Divelbiss, Planning Director, pointed out that the Commission had viewed the property and was concerned that the access is not very good and the terrain is much steeper than 5-acre zoning seems to justify. Herman W. Caylin, one of the appellants, appeared as an i nnocent party to this transaction, he s aid, and explained the background . He had a lot for 5 years and after 4-1/2 years in May found they were turni ng the property back and to s ave his investment in this, he wants to try to sell the pr operty to get his money out of it . With regard to the road referred to, it is now 22 feet wide instead 0 12 feet . Robert Felberg appeared who indicated he has a financial i nterest i n the property . He explained that he originally owned the property seven years ago . Five years ago he had sold it to several people and there was a first and second mortage on the property held by Mr . Caylin . In order to insure the first mortgage holder to finance the property, he had to put up a very large guarantee which constituted the majority of the balance of the property he ori ginally owned in the area . He is i n the same posi tion with Mr . Caylin , as the first mortgage holder is going to start foreclosure proceedings in several weeks . He s aid he was c aught by surprise because the purchasers have been prompt in their payments until recently, and had no notification that they were turning the property over to the first mor tgage holder. With regard to the topogr aphy, the terr ain is very gravelly and the roads have s t ood up very well . He had four parcels before and two were rezoned from 20 AG to 5 AG because the topogr aphy i n the area is very similar - gently rolling with one high spot on Mr. Caylin ' s property which has been ' greatly corrected by Mr. Sanchez with rerouting and rebuilding the road to eliminate the steep, inpassable grade that had existed . He believes that the new road which has a slight i ncline will be passable without any finishing , but Mr . Caylin is not applying for a lot s plit now or approval of 5- acre sites, but generally 5-acrezn1i ng so i 11 tre f uture the buyer might be in a better posi t i on. It 't'1as felt that there are two different aspects involved i n this . The local neighbors and townspeople are in opposition to the rezoning from 20-AG to 5-AG and also the promiscuous use of trailers . The trailer matter 291 292 i Novembe~ 16 , 1970 coming before the Planni "'.lg Commission rext ~-veek should be s ett led on its own me"t'its. I r. describing the 5-acre a"t'ea he s aid there are only 3 people so far who have moved on to this property and each one has successfully obtained very satisfactory domestic water s upplies . There are undergr ound electrical utilities and telephone which makes the area very desirable . He is convinced t hat five acres developed accordi ng to the rules l aid down a long time ago by the Count y will not result in harm to any of t he neighbors t o t he east and nort h who have been concerned . The closest property he owns is a portion that Mr . Burchardi sol d him about 5 years ago in Solv ang about 3-1/2 miles from subject property. He went on t o explain his present financial interest in which he had to guarantee $40,000 to t he f irst mortgage holder by putting up $7,000 in cash bond and a $35,000 mortgage t hat he obt a i ned when he sold the parcel to the east to Mr . Kaufman He said t he only reason for the opposition is that they are typing this case in with a fourth genera tion buyer who is trying t o do something i llegal in this County. Mr . J . Burchardi made a presentation on behalf of a group of people who live adjacent or own property in t he area . They are not opposing 5-acre zoning, as such as this is inevitable, but are mainly concerned in t he way this zoning takes place and the development of .the pro_perty. Twelve 5-acre pieces have been developed in such a manner that there are zoning violations on the property . He pointed out that t here are people ~oming up on a weekend and living i n a tent, and this does no t enhance the value of t he property in the surrounding area . There is also the problem when, in testing a water pump, they got less than 3 gallons per minute . If any of t hese 5-acre pr operty owners have to develop t heir own water without any planni ng , cesspools or septic t anks i n t he area, it wouJ.d ,' not be a successful situation. The w~ter report very definitely indicates quesionable quality as well as quantity of. water. So this should not take place without making a feasibility study . There seems to be a defi nite l ack of planni ng or real desire t o develop this area, he said . It has boiled .down to providi ng a source of financial aid . Fra.1k Giorgi, Chairmar of the Santa Ynez Valley Planning Committee stated thtt:y hnve vie-1cd and ~t,!,.1died this area very carefully and are in support of the recommendations of t he Planni ng Commission to deny the request . The big problem in t ha t area is that there has not been any planned development of any kind . The appellant could come in later with a definite planned development Monica Cramer, pointing ~ o t he transparency on display, mentioned a fire hazard in t he area with t he oak trees and sagebrush . Mr . Felberg reappeared in. rebuttal stating t hat no 5-acre lot splits are going t o be approved by the Cou~ ty unless t he proper requirements are l aid down by t he various departments inc~uding t he He alth Department about septic tanks, availability of water, and a~y future land developer will have to meet all the requirements so t he County has full control over this . There being no further appear ances or written statement s submitted f or or against subject proposal; Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and c ar r ied unanimously, it is ordered that subject appeal from Planni ng Conunission Hearn1. on Planng/ CeDIB. RecolllD. f rom Req. Gf Bd. of Supe . fer Initiatien ef Ord. Amendn . Ar t. f Ord. 661 to Reze e S.E. cerner ef Fair view AYe Cathedra Oaks ~d., Goleta. ' November 16, 1970 . . - deni.:il of t ne request of iie:r:rnan \~ . Cayli;1. and J5ill Mcrchic: ndo (70-RZ- 78) to ,. i nitiate an oi"dina1.1ce c-mer1di r1g Article W of Grdinance to. 661 of t he County of , - , SBnta Earba~r.c- , DS r Rme1i.ded, to rezo,ne pr operty lescribed as /ssess or's PErcel No. 137-0JO -i9 and i1estern portion ot Assessor's Parcel No . 137 010-23, general ly located 15 miles wes t of Ball ard Canyon Road, appr oximately 1-1/2 miles northerly from Chalk Hill Road, Solvang area from the 20-AG to 5-AG General Agricultural District Classification be , and the same is hereby, denied inasmuch as if this rezoning is granted it is, in effect, a subdivision with no plans as to exactly how it would be served by r oads or other services, although some day it would be 5-acre zoning wit h planned development . In the Matter of Hearing on Planning Commission Recommendation from Request of Board of Supervisors (70-RZ-81) for I nitiation of Ordinance Amending Article rJ of Ordinance No . 661 to Rezone Property Generally Located at Southeast Corner of Fairview Avenue and Cathedral Oaks Road, Goleta Valley from the A-1-X to 8-R-l or to 10-R-1 District Classification. This be.ing the date and time set for hearing on subject proposal; the Affidavit of Publication being on file with the Clerk; Mr . V. Son , a homeowner on Cathedral Oaks Road, submitted a communication indicating no particular objections to rezoning the property to 8-R-1 with certain reservations in mind. H. H. Divelbiss, Planning Director, oriented the Board on the location of the property from a transparency on display, stating that while the Planning Commission recommended rezoning to 8-R-1 on the basis that it will be consistent with existing zoning and development in the area and in conformity with the General Plan, the planning staff was in favor of the 10-R-1. Mr . Divelbiss explained that they felt the whole block of A-1-X l and should be considered, ~ot just the Forman property, and the Planning Commission had its hearing accordingly . The Commission ' s reconnnendation is for everything in the ahaded area of the transparency be rezoned to 8-R-1 . The Goleta Valley General Plan Committee discussed this and suggested to the Planning Commission that the 10-R-l most nearly meets the general plan, but the Planning Commission felt that the 8-R-1 is suitable and consistent with a lot of other properties in the area fairly consistent with the desires of the property owners . P. S. Clark, located at 640 N. Fairview, said they are one of the property owners in question, in favor of the Planning Commission recommendation for 8-R-1 based upon a number of factors which are peculiar to these properties . He proceeded t o give the history of the zoni ng activity in that area . The 8-R-l i s quite practical from a topographical viewpoint and also from a sewage disposal standpoint since the present sewer ~ ines are stubbed off . There is no drainage problem or for sewage disposal . During the ensuing discussion, it was felt there was no significant difference between the 8-R-l or 10-R-l zoning. The best way for the four properties to develop would be as a package . Mr . Clark pointed out that there would be more delay in disposing of the property if zoned 10-R-l 293 ' 294 S.B.Ce. Prese ta- November 16 , 1970 Bob Goff, property owner, said his pr imary concern is the eventual development of the area i n what it is zoned today. It was explained to him that this proposal is the result of a request for a lot aplit which was creating some problems . The solution was for the Planning Commission to consider this possibility of rezoni ng . This procedure has been done numerous times by this Board . Supervisor Grant s aid the property would eventually develop to a residential use which use should be comparable with whatever was the surrounding zoning . In this case, the surrounding zoning is 7-R-1, 8-R-1 and 10-R-1. Others indicating concern for the general area were Mrs . Herman Nybakken, a Mrs . Truman , and Tom Stieglitz . The importance of having hearings on changes t o the general plan from time t o time was stressed. Mr . Stieglitz, a member of the Goleta Valley General Plan Advisory Committee mentioned their recommendation as well as that of the planning staff to rezone this area to 10-R-l. With 8-R-l this would be in violation of the general plan and, as such, there should be understanding as to whether there will be general plan hearings set up . Mr . Divelbiss s aid the general plan shows one-quarter acre (10,000, 20,000 square feet) . Mrs . Jane Forman also appeared to state that a continuance for two weeks makes quite a difference . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Be attie, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject hearing be, and the same is hereby, duly and regularly continued to Monday, November 30, 1970, at 2 o ' clock, p .m. and referred b ack to the Pl anni ng Commission for report an1 r e0ommendation on t he Boar d o ~ Super visors ' motion that sub ject property be rezoned to 10- R-l. In the Matter of Pres entation of ''Good lvilly'' on Behalf of Santa tien ef ''Geed Barbara County People by Good't'7ill I ndustries of Southern California. Willy" by Goedwill Ind. Upon motion of Supervisor Gr ant, .seconded by Supervsor TUi nc ~ l, and f Se. Calif. / carried unanimously, it is ordered that s ubject matter be placed on the November Allewance ef Claims. ' 23, 1970 Board agenda, at 9:30 a .m. In the Matter of Allowance of Claims Upon motion, duly seconded, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the following claims be, and the same are hereby allowed, each claim for the amount and payable out of the fund designated on the f ace of each cl8im, respec t ivel y, to~wit: (SEE CLAIMS LIST PAGE 295) Upon the roll being being c alled, the following Supervisors voted Aye, to-'t.;rit: George H. Clyde, Daniel G. Grant, and Curtis Tunnell NOES: None ABSENr: Joe J. Cal l ahan and Br ancis N. Be attie Upon motion the Board adj ourned sine die The foregoing Minutes are hereby approved G ORG ' an ' ATTEST vI , Cour t y Clerk 295 November 1 z970 , ' ' a NUMBER Ulll Ulll 111 UM4 ltI u UR7 u urre US11 usn .12111 1217 US71 11116 11177 11178 UIJt UJM USG u USIS Ut J.1911 11 111 .u 12111 11HO 11111 Ustl UDI lllM c s . t z $ - %& - t I AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER " 0 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY FUND_.,. DATE la. lnt PAYEE , . a. a. lllr.ia PURPOSE . ' . . . ., SYMBOL 1 u - , taJ aan . DaJA IS a I ._ , IS ls . . --- _ . . ---I.Ir tY98. ~ . . IMlr.Ut . . . . . '*J -.1'8 Ill CieliW ~ iDM&' eaau ,_ - ., . ~-- . callf . _ ~ , Uat . 17 n lO a IJ 11 37 JI WARRANT ALLOWED FOR ' IY.OI . . a. u.u ai. 11 n.sa , . , . . u . l, . 1*t.a1 1.11 , . . 111 27 17.31 as.oo . . . .s.M ls. ti. M.M JM.II m. I . REMARKS NUMBER . ut UIU DIU UIU 11114 1llll UIM UQ.1 &Mia 11111 . IMD AC-I !57 ~ . ,; 1 ' AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER I , SANTA BARBARA COUNTY FUND .- DATE_._. M. me PAYEE . Clelif. lllUila - . .,_,.i II ---- - 9'U 111f. A.,, . . u 111117 . ~ ,. 8l CAiii-. , . . ,. . - , . . ,.,_ . - llllilllaW - . . . . . PURPOSE . . 0-71-4 . . , . . . . . - SYMBOL _, - fl , 11 ua 11a ue ,. aa ,., , aaua , u WARRANT ALLOWED FOR u. u.u -JM. i. , . u . . . . . 11.41 11 . fl un . . w.11 REMARKS . . JU.M MIM . ,. i.-. nt.19 aa IIAI J'll.'M' a . I AUDITOR;S WARRANT REGISTER ' NUMBER IMll IMN 11117 . UM& llMI , Utt 11917 'Ill I.MB ' UIM PAYEE . .- u I . OI ' Wl.UiaiaLat&I . 1 . ,Qdif ' . ,. Alfi ~ .-it.a- . ~---- .u . . . .-. . . o I f ~ . 1 . . ., . _ . ~ . ., ~ . . ,UUt . --.u. . UNI .,, ~u . SANT A BARBARA COUNTY PURPOSE . . . . , ._. . . ~ . - ~ . _ . - . . SYMBOL itaaa JAJ. l5 WalJ iM '' . . ,. ltlb H7aU 181 mat USU , UI 811 lll as UO lt , . 11 1 - . . AC-1!57 , ., . ' ' I WARRANT ALLOWED FOR , . .~ ,.,_ LOii ltlM u.11 ,_,. . . . , us. s-1 . - u.a . . . a . . . . lit . , . , REMARKS ft:I llB , ,. . . ' ' ' AUDITbR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANT A BARBARA COUNTY FUND_.-.lo_ __'- -'----'-_ _DATE NUMBER PAYEE PURPOSE l"tl '.- U.fl au. &Mn WM 'I.-~ ' , 11171 . .".\ .~ ., ,. .,. *" Ullt u.loJ,W lltl& . - . -. . . c.- ~ . . ~ . , ,i . . a.u, . . . . . UIU *lna . .U UIM ,._,. . . - . . , . . UNI ' WU ll1M . lit . . 117" . . AC-1157 . . . . . ' ' ' SYMBOL lM - ' - 1Ua M IUa lS Ul 1,7 IGU lll Ill a II uaat bl , i WARRANT ALLOWED FOR . . . , . 117.N , . . . t~ . u . .sa . 1.ao , u . u. _, u.u e.u , . , REMARKS . . . - ., . ., ,. , . ; ,. 1 teu.M ,. . . . - Wal4'11 D7 n a.u I NUMBER 111" U1'N UM 117 uua una une 11711 , unt Ullt 11711 uni UdY . ll?M .,.,. 11711 urn ,. &11 . 11740 ll?G llMI - . J.1741 ' . AC-1!57 \ I . ~ .d- . I AUDITOR'S WARRANT~ REGISTER FUND PAYEE .,. . ---~-- ~ . J ~- . ~- . ~ .\ . lluu.l a. . .' , . ,. -~~ . ;t -~ . . . . . ~. . -. . u . . . ,m Willlliaf .,P'/~~ . . SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ~~'------'~--DATE PURPOS' E i I . . . . - ' , I , ~SYMBOL . u . . - - . . , , Ill DI all aaaa IMalU . - WARRANT ALLOWED FOR , . S.HtM *'. , , 11. t.11 , n. ., . . - ~ . . . If .&I . . . . . . ue i- ,. . ,._. ' REMARKS . ' NUMBER PMI Dt 1IM7 Uf 48 UNI Dftl 11711 U7sa 11711 lnM J.17U '*'" U7R UHi WN8 Uta ' UIM ll7t'I UM UY&7 um 11,.,. JllJJ. u'n Ulfl Uft4 . . 1111 II''' '" unt 1bH AC-157 ' . . I AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER ' " - SANTA BARBARA COUNTY FUND--~-'---'-"---'------- _,_,DATE PAYEE )lJRPOSE SYMBOL WARRANT ALLOWED FOR REMARKS lit JS ~ . UOM 111 . . . ' . JM . . ~llrtla Ufa u. . Yeia w . . --.1- . GeUIM . llWlMI . . . lM ., . . . n.ao ~-- . . . . ''" ' . . . . . .,. . ., . ,. .a&.U. n. .~-.-.-. . . . . -.i---.-- l~U 71.lf ~ . -ia lltM . .i . a.o.,-.-. H.41 e.i. . . ftAell.aM&1De ''" ~ . ., . , NUMBER 11711 11711 ., U711S iaw un1 u 11711 lnll 11711 IUll U711 ,., w 11119 11111 UIN &- Ullt . , u. . ue&e IMll UIU . M UUI UDI Ul&f 1llSI AC-1!57 f . AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER - FUND PAYEE , . o. aa-._ z.-. . _ . Sl'riftL _., ll&MMa.-l a-- -.&Mel , ,. CIPl . ., . --ei u--.111M1 ____ ,. . u. ~ .u~ . ., . a. llf SANTA BARBARA COUNTY '"'--_.,;__ ___ J.JATE U. U70 PURPOSE SYMBOL - 117. ll . - - ' . WARRANT ALLOWED FOR Ut.M ., . ., . . . 11. . . . , . 11.41 , . .*.' . u.1 - . ., . . ,. . ., 111. 16.M us. . 11 . , REMARKS ' -- '" ., ~ . . ' AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER - SANTA BARBARA COUNTY FUND_ __ ., ~=.=. ----~ATE " NUMBER I UUI J.aell PAYEE 't . . . . aMINIWl1- Am- . 11919 1:1 , h&I . . trl.11& Ci ,._. . . PURPOSE . ldi#U. . . ., SYMBOL 11711 , a I 1 au 1an lit a II lit. u UlaJ Hea 11 uaan utan 1171 WARRANT ALLOWED FOR 17.IS ne. 1.a1.u ,. Ul.41 lU.11 ''' a.11t.11 ., n . . l_ 111.00 ., . ua. J.111 . aa. 111 . sn. m. 11.11 REMARKS - l7J UUI ' 1n AC-1!57 ., . lllinilla .,._ . CidU __ ,. __. __ nu. . ~ ., . . J.f4. u . .'." au ., - 181 a aa ueca Q us au 8S.11Y.M .is . . 47 . u a.1.,-." . ,. ' : NUMBER - Ullt UMI UIU '*' 1-1 AC-1!57 li-' . . ' AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER ' ~1 PAYEE _.1- _.,~_ .,., t edU-- . . . ._ . . SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PURPOSE . Ii . . . . SYMBOL us an - Ul 11 lH aaw JA a l4 14 P8M UM JA au , , IA MaH ltlaM "'. 1t UISIA lfl. )A " WARRANT ALLOWED FOR 11.n . ''" 1.M CJ.Ml.U) U.11 .u.n . 1.11 M.U . .''.". ., 1Udl . 111 . l'llallt. . ' REMARKS NUMBER uel7 11111 UIU 11171 A C-1!57 . . AUDITOR,S WARRANT REGISTER - SANT A BARBARA COUNTY FUND _ __. . _____ _.,DATE PAYEE PURPOSE SYMBOL .i9W.:r 111 a M . , 11 ~ . i ~.- Ml e 1 . 1. u .a. . , . u titw ., C.'if . u. 1171 WARRANT ALLOWED FOR "" .u Ml.M ia.n . u.11 u ~-- - REMARKS NUMBER 11171 lla7t UDe AC-1!57 ' , ' . . ' ' - AUDITOR'S WARR. ANT. REGISTER SANT A BARBARA COUNTY FUND_ __._.,__ _____ ~DATE ' PAYEE ' PURPOSE SYMBOL I ' . . Qe a . I .u&llf ~ lf.t., l.l,.~ U&l ftd Ht .a.sri.e. lb -.-.~- --. . au.wa . u WARRANT ALLOWED FOR . UI . n~aa.10 LU . , i~ao.t1 . ,. 1-&a4Je i.11t.IO , s111 . . ' ' REMARKS t I ~ ' 1 "'' \ ' " f ' . . . AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER - SANT A BARBARA COUNTY FUND ltllll DATE NUMBER PAYEE PURPOSE SYMBOL ALWLOAWRERDA NFTO R REMARKS J-n7 Wal . O_ 110 alt IOl.10 ., . , . 115.35 , . Do Ml,.90 .,.,. ,.,.1 IO kt'llQ . ,_fll ue.M ~,., .,.~ n1.os .,_,., . , ftJ-.JJ ~, Ul.t& ,., , 21t.l . , - 02.IO Af-781 . , w.a.- ut.a .,._., . . . u , ., .,. .,., CharMliU Ul.lJ *'"'" , ._ . a-'H 2H.ll _, llania . . 74 .,.,.,. 7t.l8 .J-718 . , . . .r-ffl ~to al\100 u 1i1 n .-1 C.tl . . .J802 au. .,., 111.os % . ISl.~.t .,. . . SM.91 ,,. ., . ., . ., ~ . ~ . . , . 1lo ., . ., . DP 112.M J4l0 k'MW&ll.a ' a-111 u 221.tl 1-81.1 Qt.~ .,.u m.ao a .81A .,u-. tat.JO. a-tu ~ ue.2 4'rnJ. 191.0S 8 11117 ._ . 172.l .J-tl ' . ---- . ~- -- AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PAYEE PURPOSE SYMBOL WARRANT NUMBER ALLOWED FOR REMARKS ,. . U.O . ut.D. , \ , . ' . . 11 . alt.JI .Jat ~ , arll3 *'. lo .,_. t1i1lllW . aa.11 . _ 2.u . t1: . ., , .,.,, , . w . lH.'9 - IN*MSit:la,r . u . *" a.-111 .- .u. 41 tJP2 Wi&llia li . u QJ.40 .J1wlP lrllMI: S.IO a-1M .1 . .01 . . Hl.-ff - Hl1 Ui*lt~-- . ,. . :a?m a.oe ~ l , ,_ al2.M ~- , .,. . tfcrM3 ~lilcata ao M . . 111.tt ~ ~ . . a.A ~ ~ . lo ' , . . 1 .,.,. aa~s . . . ttl. . 3111 ., .,., ., . ~ UUlilt~ ' Ut.-oo -'" ~a1 _, u. J~- . ., ._ ; Ml.J.O I . s. . *M.n . - . , . AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISlER SANT A BARBARA COUNTY I . I f FUND .f DAT~ 1'. 1'70 I PAYEE PURPOSE SYMBOL WARRANT NUMBER ALLOWED FOR REMARKS ~~ llOaU m.sa aslll ._. U7.U . , 411 01 "''' . . , . Ul.J8 , . 409.U .,, . WiUllaU 1'' -~ ,. *9Mt a. &tU. ar. . , . ., .-m.a ur.11 llaill't . 111.91 . . . a 17S Wllllii.tll 111.n a_ Nd . , . . ne.os ~ . , . a2.M . ni.n aMIM!d . , YUie . . eu1, , . 111.54 MAl , ! ., Cl~ 1.u ltl.11 . ,_II WMu . ., . lb . . JJ.9 . SN.61 .,., . uu . , NUMBER ~, . . ., . azlf7 ~- ~- ,. a.Ml illll . ., . . "8110 .a-tu atU 11 .i--.w ., ,. .,_ta . ~n .,. .,, ~Jl .J.tlt I ' AUDITORS WARRANT REGISTER PAYEE w . ~u' . 1 ~~ u.~ .,,. ,1110 ~Al o --.u ~"I . ._.,_ ll ~ lldli ._. n&ta ,._ u-. WUUliaa . , SANTABARBARA COUNTY PURPOSE SYMBOL HA lO 90&10 lOt A ie us IUF' U91.l anra~ is '7 .ti Al - . . . . lSa. Jairr lltt.1 . . . JltA .U ta 1 UOAl WARRANT ALLOWED FOR ws.n . , . _ 1-a.e ., . ., lAlM . ,. t.lt u.oo , . ., . U.ta ~'1 u.11 ".-'.' . , 274.H "'" un UJ-.H cu~aa us . . 10.t1 . , , . us . u. . . . 7 110.H . . .,. . , 1o.- 6. 279.St REMARKS ,1.a.l 1.181.M . . ' . . - NUMBER PAYEE . . ' \ AC-1!!7 'I' ' l . AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANTA BARBARA COUNTY FUND ., . _ _____ _._.DATE . . . ' PURPOSE SYMBOL WARRANT ALLOWED FOR l,. . . . .,. a.11 , i. REMARKS I 296 . . Approval of Minutes of Nov. 16,1970 Mtg. Execution of Agreemt btw Co. City of Santa Barbara for Maint. of Harbor. ( November 23, 1970 "' . Board of Supervisors of the County of Sant2 Barbara State of California, November 23, 1970, at 9:30 o ' clock, m. Present: George H. Clyde, Joe J . Callahan, Daniel G. Grant and Curtis Tunnell, and J . E. Lewis , Clerk, Absent: Francis H. Beattie Supervisor Clyde in the Chair . . . . In the Matter of Approval of 'Minutes of November 16, 1970 Meeting . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and - carried unanimously, it is ordered that the reading of the minutes of the November 16, 1970 meeting be dispensed with, and the minutes approved, as submitted. In the Matter of Execution of Agreement between County and City of Santa Barbara for Maintenance of Harbor, from July 1, 1970 to June 30, 1971, in an Amount not to Exceed $30,000. 00. (Cont ' d) . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adapted: RESOLUTION NO . 70- 702 ~ORIGINAL IN PERMA~NT FILE2 Recommend. of In the Matter of Recommendation of Director of Parks for Execution Director of Parks for Exe of Extension of Crop Lease between the County and P. L. Pinoli for use of County cution of Extension of Farm Property on Hollister Avenue . Crop Lease b Co. P.L. Pi oli Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and Hollister Ave Property. / carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute a Crop Lease , dated November 16, 1970, between the County and P. L. Pinoli for use of County Farm Property on Hollister Avenue, as recommended by the Director of Parks . Designating t e In the Matter of Designating the Office of County Counsel to CoPduct County Ccunse to Conduct Pr - Proceedings Pertaining to the Lanterman- Petris -Short Act Relating to Mentally ceedgs. re Lanterman-Pet is- Disordered Persons . Short Act re Mentally Dis- Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and ordered perso s. 1 carri ed unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: Resolution Consentg. to Franchise Transfer to So.Calif .Gas Interpret. Ord. #2012. J RESOLUTION NO . 70-703 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Resolution Consenting to Franchise Transfer in Name of Southern California Gas Company and Interpretation of ''Fiscal Year'' used in Ordinance No . 2012 to mean Fiscal Year of Grantee . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and Carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO . 70- 704 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) Resolution Authorzn Auditor-Controller of S.B.CO. to Issue Warrant Condemna tion case , Go. v Alverta Fraser, et al. I Issuance of 1 Neg. ~ond to Buellton Union School Dist. I November 23, 1970 In the Matter of Resolution Authorizing and Directing AuditorController of Santa Barbara County to Issue Warrant ($1,564.00, Condemnation Case , County v Alverta Fraser, et al) . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell , seconded by Supervisor Grant, and ' carried unanimous ly , the following resoluti on was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO . 70 - 705 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Issuance of One (1) Negotiable Note in the Amount of $20,000.00 to Buellton Union School District . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously , the following resolution was passed and adopted: RRS O,LQTION NQ. 70- 706 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) cceptance of ight of Way Gra from Florence T. In the Matter of Accept ance of Right of Way Grant w.ithout monetary t Mountain Drive. Hyde.cons ideration from Florence T. Hyde, Mountain Drive , First Supervisorial District, I Acceptance of Right of Way Grant from S.B.Motor Lodges,In on Calle Real. I Establishing a Stop Intersection at Yap Ave. ~ Vala Drive. v for Additional Road Right of Way . Upon motion of Spervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervi sor Grant, and carri ed unanimously, it is ordered that a Right of Way Grant, dated October 10, 1968 , from Florence T. Hyde, a married woman, as her separate property, for additional road right of way on Mountain Drive , First Supervisorial District, . be, and t he same is hereby, accepted by the Count y without monetary consideration; and the Clerk be , and he is hereby, author i zed and directed to record said document in the office of the Santa Barbara County Recorder In the Matter of Acceptance of Right of Way Grant without monetary cons ideration from Santa Barbara Motor Lodges, I uc . , for Additional Road Right of Way on Calle Real , Third Supervisorial District . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously , it is ordered that a Right of Way Gra1t, dated November 10 , 1970, from Sa11ta ~ arbara Motor Lodges , Incorporated, a California Corporation, for additional road right of way on Calle Real, Third Supervisorial District, be, and the same is herety, accepted by the Cou ty without monetary consideration; and the Clerk Le, and ~e is hereby, autnorized and directed to record said document in the office of the Sar ta Barbara County Recorder . In the Matter of Establishing a St op inters~ction in the Third Supervisorial District . (Yaple Ave . at VaJa Drive) : Upon motion of Supervisor Tu~nell , seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimousJy, the f~llowing resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTI ON NO. 70-707 (ORIGI NAL IN PERMANENT FILE) 298 Establishing ''No Parking Zone'' on Portion of Patterson Ave I Establighing ''No Parking Zones'' on Portions of Calle Real. I Establishing No Parking Zone on Porti n of Finney St. in Stunmerland ( Establishin& No Parking Zone on Porti n of Hollister Ave. ' Establishing Passenger Load&. Zones on FairYiew Ave. I Establishing No. Parkin& Zone on Sta. in 3rd Sup. Dist. I November 23 , 1970 In the Matter of Establishing a ''No Parking Zone'' on a Portion of Patterson Avenue , a Courty Highway in the Third Supervisorial District . Upon motion of Supervis or Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and car ried unanimously , the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO . 70-708 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In t he Matter of Establishing ' 'No Parking Zones'' on Portions of Calle Real, a County Hihway in t he Third Supervisorial District . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, s econded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, the following resoluti on was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO . 70 - 709 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENI' FILE) In the Matter of Establishing a ''No Parking Zone'' on a Portion of Finney Street, in the Town of Summerland, a County Highway in the First Supervisorial District . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, t he following resolution was passed and adopted : RESOLUTION NO . 70-710 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Establishing a ''No Parking Zone'' on a Portion of Hollister !venue, a County Highway in t he Third Supervisorial District . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, the following resolut i on was passed and adopt ed: RESOLUTI ON NO . 70-711 {ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) 0 In t he Matter of Establishing ''Passenger Loading Zones" on a Certai n County Highway, Known as Fairview Avenue , in the Thir d Supervis ori al Dis t r ict . Upon moti on of Supervisor Tunnell , seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimousl y, the following resoluti on was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO . 70 - 712 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Establishing ''No Parking Zones'' (Bus Zones) on Certain Streets in the Third Supervisorial District and Rescinding Portions of Resolution No . 68- 7 . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell , seconded by Supervisor Grant , and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed ard adopted: RESOLUTION NO . 70- 713 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) Accept. of Easemt . Deeds Maria Ygnacia Cree1'. / Extension ~ Renewal Lease Agreemt. btw Co. ~ Palance Inves - mt. Co., Inc. I November 23, 1970 In the Matter of Acceptance of Easement Deeds (4) conveyed on donation basis for Flood Control Purposes, Maria Ygnacia Creek, Parcel Nos . 5 .1 , 6 .1 , 7.1 and 8 .1, Foli o No . 352. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that t he following Easement Deeds for flood control purposes, Maria Ygnacia Creek, Folio No . 352, be and the same are hereby , accepted by t he County on a donation basis: tl) J anusz Tyszkiewica Lacki and Elizabeth Tyszkiewica Lacki , husband and wife, as Joint Tenants, Parcel No . 5 .1, Walnut Park, dated November 9, 1970. / 2) Ruth Louise Hill Culbertson , a married woman, who acquired said land as Ruth Louise Hill , an unmarried 't'1oman , Parcel 6 .1 , Walnut Park, dated November 9, 1970 ( 3) Wesley F. Inman and Arlyn M. I nman , husband and wife, as Joint Tenants, Parcel No . 7.1, Walnut Park, dated November 7, 1970 . /4) Roselinde B. Konrad, a single woman, Parcel No . 8 .1 , Walnut Park, dated November 10, 1970. It is further ordered that t he Clerk be , and he is hereby, authorized and directed to record said documents in t he office of the Santa Barbar a County Recorder, after referral t o the Santa Barbar a County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for acceptance. In the Matter of Extension and Renewal of Lease Agreement between the County and Palace Investment Company , I nc . , f or County Probation Department Office Space in Santa Maria Theatre Building, Br oadway & Church Streets, for One-year Period at Rate of $234. 00 per m0nth, effective October 23, 1970. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and c arried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby , authorized and directed to execute an Extension and Renewal of Lease Agreement between the County and the Palace Investment Company, I nc . , for County Probation Department office space in Santa Maria Theatre Building, Broadway & Church Streets,for a one-year period at the r ate of $234. 00 per . month f or a total of $2, 808 .00, effective October 23, 1970. It is further ordered that the Auditor be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed t o drm'1 the necess ary warrants i n the amount of $234.00 per month in f avor of the Palace Investment Company, Inc . , for the rental payments. Said warrants should be drawn upon submission u the pr oper Demand of Payment form, as submitted by the Lessor, each and every month. 299 , . Request of Co.Asses or In the Matter of Request of County Assessor for Rescission of Board for Rescission of Bd.Order re Cancel. Order of August 17, 1970 relative to Cancellation of 90% of Taxes on Certain % of Taxes on Prop. 70-71 Assessmt. Properties on 1970-71 Tax Assessment Roll . I Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and c arried unanimously , it is ordered that Board Order of August 17, 1970 relative to cancellation of 90% of t axes on the following properties on the 1970-71 Tax Assessment Roll be, ar d the same is hereby, rescinded, as requested by the 300 Execution of Release Co. Claims re Dam.ages to Co Property re Vehicular Accident. , I Approvng. App ications for A pt. to Med.Staff S.B.Gen.Hosp. I November 23, 1970 County Assessor: 25-252-07 Code 2001 39-212- 35 Code 2001 103-260-02 Code 80-044 139-063-04 Code 90 -010 In the Matter of Execution of Release of All County Claims for Damages to County Property Resulting from Vehicular Accident, in the Amount of $11 . 30. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman and Clerk be , and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute a Release of all County claims for damages to County property resulting from a vehicular accident, as follows: Darlene Gail Alfprd, Sept. 13, 1970, on Vandenberg Road . It is further ordered that the Director, Department of Resources & Collections be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed t o deposit the draft received. in full settlement therefor to the. Road Fund In the Matter of Approving Applications for Appo i ntment to Medical Staff as Requested by Santa Bar bar a General Hospital Medical Director . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and c arried unanimously, it is ordered that the request of the Santa Barbara General Hospital Medical Director t o approve the following applications for appointment to the Medical Staff be , and the same is hereby, approved: Dr . J ack W. Love Dr. William P. Urschel Dr . John H. K. Vogel Approvng.Appl ca- In the Matter of Approving Applications for Appoi ntment to Medical tions for App to Med.Staff Staff as Requested by Santa Maria Hospital Medical Director . Santa Maria Hospital. I . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and Release of Ta Bond Tract #10,913, Unit 2. aelease of Ta Bond Tract fl0,699, Unit 3. I c arried unanimously, it is ordered that the request of the Santa Maria Hospital Medical Director to approve the following applications for appointment to the Medical Staff be, and the same is hereby, .approved: George T. Robertson, M.D. Harry K. Kienke, M.D In the Matter of Release of Tax Bond for Tract #10,913, Unit 2. Upon .motion of Supervisor Tunnell , seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the cash t ax bond for Tract #10,913, Unit 2, in the amount of $3,437 . 00, for 1970-71 be, and the s ame is hereby , released, as requested by the County Tax Collector and s aid warrant be made payable to him. In the Matter of Release of Tax Bond f or Tract #10,699, Unit 3 . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and c arried unanimously, it is ordered that the cash t ax bond for Tract #10,699, ' Reconmend. of Plan Dept. re Placemt. of Bond for Landscaping * Sprinkle System ~ Cash Depoe t for Maint. of St. Trees for Colvin Developmt. Pln.for Med. Bldg. / Request of Purchas Agent for Waiver o Biddng Procedure f X-Ray Equip.S.B.GE Hospital. I Request of City Cle k of Santa Maria r Cancel. of Lot Cleans Chgs. / November 23, 1970 Unit 3, be , and the same is hereby, released in the amount of $6,058. 80 , made payable to the County Tax Collector, and remai ni ng balance of $61 . 20, made payable to Meeker Development Co., 132 East Live Oak Avenue, Arcadia , California, as requested by the CouPty Tax Collector In the Matter of Recommendation of Planni ng Department for Placement of Bond for Landscaping and Sprinkler System and Cash Deposit for Maintenance of Street Trees for Revised Colvin Development Plan for Medical Building (70-M-89). ' ' Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the recommendation of the Planning Department for the placemePt of a bond in the amount of $900. 00 for landsc aping and sprinkler system, a~ d a cash depos~t i n the amount of $30. 00 for street tree maintenance for Revised Colvin Development Plan for Medical Buil ding (70-M-89) be, and the same is hereby , confirmed. The bond should contain wording similar to the following: In consideration of approval by the County Planning Commission of a precise plan for development, Case No . 70-M-89 at 678 Alamo Pintado Road, Solvang, also known as Assessor ' s Parcel No . 139-030- 57, Mr . La Varr Colvin hereby agrees to assure planting and sprinkler system within one year from the date of issuance of the zoning clearance, and in accordance with the approved landscaping plan dated November 17, 1970, on file with the County Landscape Architect . In the Matter of Request of Purchasing Agent for tlaiver of Bidding Procedure for Purchase of X-Ray Equipment, Santa Barbar a Gener al Hospital, from Picker Medical Products Co . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell , seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the request, of the Purchas i ng Agent for waiver of bidding procedure for the purchase of the following X-Ray equipment for Santa Barbara General Hospital from the Picker Medical Products Company, sole source of supply be, and the same is hereby, approved: 1 each Picker Detachable Image I ntensifier System 1 each Radiographic-Fluoroscopic Tilt Table 1 each Double Focus Fluoroscopic Rotating Tube 1 pai r Fluoroscopic Cables 9 each Cassettes with Blocker Screens $21,303 .45 18,690.00 1, 811.25 472 . 50 465 . 70 $42,742 . 90 These items are budgeted in the current fiscal year 159-C-1 budget items #170 and #171, and the total amount allocated is $43,000. 00. In the Matter of Request of City Clerk of Santa Maria for Cancellation of Lot Cleaning Charges for Certain Parcels Due to Clerical Error. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the request of the City Clerk of Santa 301 302 November 23, 1970 Maria for cancellation of lot cleaning charges for the following parcels due to clerical error be, and the same is hereby, referred to the County Auditor and County Tax Collector for cancel~ation on the tax roll: Assessor' s Parcel 117- 393- 08 117- 393-12 125-141-17 Amount $17 . 85 17 . 85 57 . 37 Tax Bill No . 35940 35944 32940 Request of In the Matter of Request of City Clerk of Santa Maria for Cancellation City Clerk of Santa Maria r of $169 . 25 from Dr . Norman H. Miller ' s Tax Bill No . 28941, Assessor's Parcel Cancel . Dr. Norman H. Mil er's No . 119-185-11. Tax Bill #289 1. I Extension of Lease Agreemt btw Co. " D. W.Cobum Ambassador Tract, S.B. ( Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the request of the City Clerk of Santa Maria for cancellation of $169. 25 from Dr. Norman H. Miller ' s Tax Bill No . 28941, Assessor's Parcel No . 119-185-11, as satisfaction of this obligation to the City of Santa Maria has been made in a separate transaction be, and the same is hereby, approved, under Street and Highways Code Section 5870 In the Matter of Extension of Lease Agreement between the County and D. W. Coburn for Five-year Period for Property in Ambassador Tract., City of Santa Barbara. Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carri ed unani mously , i t i s orderep that the request of D. W. Coburn for an ext ension of f i ve- year period ending July 1, 1976, on lease agreement with the Count y for property in t he Ambassador Tract, City of Santa Barbara, be, and the s ame i s hereby, referred t o t he County Counsel and Right of Way agent Request of In the Matter of Request of Orcutt Fire Department for Closing of Fire Dept.for Closng Portio Portion of Union Avenue to South Broadway, then to Clark Avenue to Dyer Street of Union Ave. for Orcutt and Orcutt School for Annual Childrens ' Christmas Parade, December 12, 1970, School Christ s Parade. / at 1:00 p .m. Publication o Ord.#2129. I Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, ~econded by Supervisor Grant, ~nd carried unanimously, it is ordered that the request of the Orcutt Fire Department for the closing of a portion of Union Avenue to South Broadway, then to Clark Aven~e to Dyer Street and Orcutt School for Annual Childrens ' Christmas Parade, December 12, 1970, at 1:00 p .m. , be, and the same is hereby, referred to the Sheriff and Road Department. In the Matter of Publication of Ordinance No . 2129 . it appearing from the Affidavit of Publication of the Principal Clerk of the Santa Barbara News-Press that Ordinance No. 2129 has been published in the manner and fo:pn required by law; Upon motion, duly seconded, and carried unanimously, it is determined that s aid Ordinance No. 2129 has been published in the manner and form required by law Communications /1 Approval of Rider to Oil Drillng Bond . . Release of Oil Drilling Bond. November 23, 1970 In the Matter of Reports and Communications . The following reports and communications were received by the Board and ordered placed on file: 11) County Health Dept . - Report of Money Collected, Animal Control, October, 1970. /2) Application of Golden West Airli nes , Inc . to PUC to increase certain of its intras t ate passenger fare . In the Matter of Approval of Rider to Oil Drilling Bond. Pursuant to the request of County Petroleum Engineer, and in accordance with the provision contained in Ordinance No . 1927; Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and cerried unanimously, it is ordered that the following rider to oil drilling 3Q3 bond be , and the same is hereby, approved: Shell Oil Company- The T ra~lers Indemnity Company Blanket Bond S-305 , r i der covering t he foll o w tn~ wells: CAT CANYON - EAST County Permit Nos . 2289 2143 2241 2141 2305 2219 2242 1900 2296 2123 2150 926 2270 2374 2387 2402 AB 2264 2244 2226 2300 2211 2232 2220 2313 2573 Well No . Cal-Trust 4fol7 Canfield 4fol8 Canfield #28-X Well Delaney- Tunnell #llX Delaney-Tunnell #12 Delaney- Tunnell #21X Delaney-TunLell #22 Delaney-Tunnell #23 Thomas ffo87 Thomas 4fo88X Waite-Bradley #81 Bradley Lands Unit #5-1 Bradley Lands Unit #5-2 Bradley Lands Unit #5-4 Bradley Lands Unit #5-5 Bradley Lands Unit #5-6 Br adley Lands Urit #5-10 Bradley Lands Unit #5-11 Bradley Lands Unit #5-12 Bradley Lands Unit #5-13 Bradley Lands Unit #5- 22 Bradley Lands Unit #5 -31 Bradley Lands Unit #5- 33 Br adley Lands Unit #6-1 Bradley Lands Unit #6-2 Ir the Matter of Release of Oi l Drilling Bond. Pursuant to t he request of the County Petroleum Engi neer, and in accordance with the provi s i ons contained in Ordinance No . 1927; 304 Presentation f ''Good Willy'' Scroll by Goo - Will Ind. / November 23 , 1970 Upon .motion of Supervisor Tunnell , seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the following oil drilling bond be , the same is hereby, released as to all future acts and conditions . Anza Pacific Corporation ~ Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York Blanket Bond No . 1203449 covering the fo l lowing 'tV'ells: Permit No . 1900 2123 2141 2143 2197. 2219 2241 2242 2289 . 2296 2305 2150 2220 2300 2211 2226 2232 2244 2264 2270 926 2374 2387 2402 2313 2573 ENDORSEMENTS Well No . Delaney-Tunnell No . 23 Thomas No . 88-X Delaney-Tunnell No . 11-X Canfield No . 18 Cal-Trust No . 15 Delaney-Tunnell No . 21-X Canfield No . 28-X Delaney-Tunnell No . 22 Cal -Trust No . 17 Thomas No . 87 Delaney-Tunnell No . 12 Waite-Br adley No . 81 Fortune Br adley No . 33- 5 Fortune Bradley No . 13-5 Fortune Br adley No . 22-5 Fortune Br adley No . 12-5 Fortune Bradley No . 31-5 Fortune Bradley No . F-11-5 Fortune Bradley No . F-10-5 Bradley No . 2 Br adley No . 5-1 Fortune-Bradley No . 5-4 Fortune-Bradley No . 5-5 Fortune-Bradley No . 5-6 Bradley Lands Unit 6-1 Bradley Lands Unit 6- 2 In the Matter of Presentation of ''Good ~villy'' Scroll from W. C. Wilki nson , Public Relations Director, Goodwill I ndustri es of Souther n Califor ni a . Mr . Wi lkinson made subj ect pr esent ation to the Board as an expressi on of appr eciation for County support on rehabilitation services , on- the- job training , reemployment, and assisting in people getting i nto vocational trades and off the wel fare rolls . The Chairman accepted this t oken of appreciati on and t hanked Mr . Wilkinson for his presentation. Notice from C lif. In the Matter of Notice from California Senate Local Government Senate Local o~t. Comn.re Publi Committee on Public Hearing December 7-8 , 1970 at Sacramento on Premature Sut- Hearin& in Sa ramento on Pre- divisions (SB 395-Walsh & SR-326 Alqui st & Nejedly) . mature subdivisions. / November 23, 1970 Upon motion of Supervisor Gra1 t , seconded by Supervisor Tunnell , and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, a d the same is hereby, referred t o the Courty Counsel and Planning Di.rector for report back to the 3oard. Allowance of Positi ns, In the Matter of Allowar.ce of Positions , DisallowaDce of Positions, Disallowance & Fixi I of Compensation for and Fixing of Compensation for Mo ~1thly Salaried Positions . (Effective Monthly Salaried Positions. / December 1, 1970 , Merit Increases and other Personnel Actions) , Fixing Compensation for monthly Salari d Positions; Laguna C San. District. I Settin& Maint. of Co.Depts. I Ord. #2137. I Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, s econded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO . 70-714 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FIL~) In the Matt er of Fixing Compersation f or Monthly Salaried Positions for Laguna County Sanitation District . (Effective December 1, 1970) . Upon moti on of Supervisor Tunnell , seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unani mous l y, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLU.TION NQ 70-715 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Setting Fort h Mai ntenance of Certain Employees , Furnished f or t he Berefit of t he County . (Effective December 1, 1970, Fire Department, Santa Barbar a ard Sant a Maria Hospitals, Juvenile Hall , La Morada Girl ' s Residence, Los Prietos Boys ' Camp, Parks , Cachuma , County Grounds, Veterar ' s Memorial Bui ldi ngs) . RESOLUTION No . 70- 716 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In t he Matter of Ordinance No . 2137 - An Or dinance of the County of Santa Bar bara Amending Section 6 of Ordinance No . 2128 , as Amended , being the Salary Ordinance of the County of Santa Bar bara . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell , and c arried unanimously, t he Board passed and adopted Ordinance No . 2137 of the County of Santa Barbar a , entitled ''An Or di nance of the County of Santa Barbara Amending Section 6 of Ordinance No . 21 , as Amended, being t he Salary Ordinance of t he County of Santa Bar bar a . " (Principal Admi nistrative Analyst, Range 84) . Upon the r oll being called the following Supervisors voted Aye, t o-wit: Appt. of Ad Hoc Ce to Study Methods of Fundn& Implemtna Bikewaya. George H. Clyde, J oe J . Cal lahan , Daniel G. Grant, and Curtis Tunnell . NOES: None . ABSENT: Francis H. Beattie . In the Matter of Appoi ntment of Ad Hoc Committee to Study Methods of Funding and Implementing Bikeways Presently Part of the County General Plan . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and c arried unanimously , it is ordered t hat an ad hoc c ommittee be , and the same is hereby , appointed t o study and report t o the Board methods of funding and implementing bikeways tha t are now part of t he County General Plan f or Bikeways and amendments t hereto, as recommended by Supervisor Grant, i ncluding the following: Administrative Officer County Courisel 305 306 R.econm.of .Admin.Officer to Cancel Centract with Mund,McLaurin &tee.Ins.Consu t. I I Road Commissioner Planning Director Parks Director November 23, 1970 In the Matter of Recommendation of Administrative Officer to Cancel Contract with t he Firm of Mund, McLaurin & Company, Insurance Consultants for Analysis of County's I nsurance Program. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the contract between the County of Santa Barbara and the firm of Mund, McLaurin & Company, Insurance Consultants, dated April 11, 1969 , to make a thorough fact-finding analysis of the County ' s entire insurance program be, and the same is hereby, cancelled, effective forthwith, as recommended by the Administrative Officer . It is further ordered that, inasmuch as the consultant failed to comply with the time schedule and has not made any requests for extension or satisfactory explanation for the delay for delivery of the report, the recommendation to return said report to the co ~s ultant ~'1ithout making the $2, 500 payment fur services rendered be, and the same is hereby, confirmed. Authorizn1 In the Matter of Authorizing Chairman and Clerk to Execute ''Notice of Chairman ~ Cl rk te Execute Terminati on of Agreement as to Confinement of Female Prisoners" between Santa Terminatien o Acreemt re Barbara County and Ventura County. Cenfinemt. of Female Prison rs Upon motion of Supervisor Grant , seconded by Supervisor Tunnell , and btw S.B.Co. ~ Ventura -co. carried unanimously, it is ordered tha t the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are I hereby, authorized a.rd directed to execute a ' 'Notice of Termination of Agreement Appointmt. of Representativ s to Addiction Drug Abuse Co / as to Confinement of Female Prisoners'' between Santa Barbara County and Ventura County, dated May 27, 1968 , with transfer of female sentenced prisoners into new Santa Barbara County j ail effective on or before February 1, 1971. It is further ordered that County Counsel be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to proceed with nullification of Superior Court Order No . 81600, dated March 5, 1968 , designating Ventura County as the place of confinement of Sant a Bar bara County sentenced female prisoners . In the Matter of Appoi ntment of Representatives to Addiction and Drug Abuse Commission . Communic at ~ ons were received for appointment to subject commission, as follows: rl) Sheriff - I nspector Peter J . Zanella. / 2) / 3) I 4) County Health Officer - Frank Cline, Jr . , M. D. , Deputy Health Officer . Chief Probation Officer - John Fuller, Delinquency Prevention Officer. Presiding Judge of Superior Court - Superior Court Judge Arden T. Jensen. Upon motion of Supervisor Callahan, seconded by Supervisor Tun.nell , and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, continued to Monday, November 30, 1970, when a full board is expected t o be present . Autherizing Chairma Clerk to Execute Addendum te Agreemt btw S.B.Co. Trans america Title Ina. Ce. re Extensien of Cathedral Oak ltd. I First Readn& ef Ord Adoptn1 Unif erm Bldg, Pl1mbn1, Elec , Mech. Heus in& Ced a. I lnvitatien frem L.A Ce. Bd. ef Sup. te join Req. for Spec.Sessi n of Legis. te secure lmmed.Actien en Preperty Tax Iteferm I Cnnnunicatien from State Dept. of Wate Resurces on Dams subject te State Jurisdictien. / Recenn. ef Admin. Officer te Fill Vacant Poaitiens. / November 23, 1970 In the Matter of i\uthorizing Chairman ard Clerk to Execute Addendum to Agreement dated August 19, 1970 between Santa Barbara County ar d Trans america Title Insurance Company upon Receipt of Executed Copies from Trans america in CoLnection with Extension of Cathedral Oaks Road, Project No . 3026 .1, Th~rd Supervisorial District . Miss Susan Trescher, Deputy County Counsel, explained that the Southern California Edison Company does not adversely oppose this form of easement but a suggested change is acceptable to Transamerica , from a grant of eqsement subject to a condition, to a form of grant with an exception to the right to install overhead utilities . The actual grant will be forthcoming from Transamerica with the amendment in several weeks Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Chairman and Clerk be, and they are hereby, authorized and directed to execute an Addendum to an Agreement {dated August 19, 1970) between Santa Barbara County and Transamerica Title Company on subject matter, upon receipt of fully executed copies from Trans - ameri ca . In the Matter of First Reading of Ordinan~e Adop:ing Uniform Building, Plumbing, Electrical, Mechanical and Housing Codes, Latest Editions . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, continued to Monday, November 30, 1970, at the request of County Counsel . In the Matter of Invitation from Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors to Join in Request for Special Session of Legislature to Secure Immediate Action on Property Tax Reform. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, placed on file . ' In the Matter of Communication from State Department of Water Resources on Dams Subject to State Jurisdiction. , as it ef fects Subdi vis i ons. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the Planning Director, Public Works Director, and Flood Control Engineer . In the Matter of Recommendation of Administrative Officer to Fill Vacant Positions for Various Departments . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unan imously, it is ordered that the recommendation of the Administrative Officer to fill v arious v acant positions in the Cour ty be, and the same is hereby, confirmed, effective forthwith or as otherwise indicated, as fo l lows: 307 308 November 23 , 1970 Health Department - General Fund: Position: Position: Position: Position: Senior Steno Clerk, #150 . 6660.01 Intermediate Typist Clerk, #150. 3400 .02 Community Aide, #150.1670.02 Deputy Health Officer, #150 . 2180 .03 Data Processing - General Fund: Position: Computer Operator, #66.1700.02 S. B. General Hospital - General Fund: Position: Stationary Engineer, #159. 6620 .01 Probation - Juvenile Hall - General Fund: Position: Assistant Group Supervisor, #103 . 0640 Santa Maria Hospital - General Fund: Position: Hospital Attendant, #160. 3200 .15 Auditor-Controller - General Fund: Position: Position: Account Clerk, #05 . 0020. 04, - . 08 Extra Help (Blanket approval for extra help employees awaiting full - time employment and for extra help in updating vacation and sick leave records for new payroll system. ) Fire Department - General Fund : Position: Extra Help (Blanket approval for any safety member pos itions as they become vacant . ) Plann ing Department - General Fund: Position: Extra Help (Request one extra help position for work on Pub:ic Services Allocation Study, effective December 1, 1970 . ) Welfare Department - General Fund: Position: Position: Position: Eligibility Worker, #155. 2608 .60 Community Aide, #155. 6520 . 05 Eligibility Worker Trainee, #155 . 2612 .33 and - . 34. Authrn& 1-Ye r In the Matter of Authorizing the One-Year Extension of Agreement Extensien ef A&reemt. btw between the County of Santa Barbara and Santa Barbara Community Action Commission et S.B. ic S.B Community Act en for County Payment of $500 . 00 Per Month for Operation under the Economic Opportunity Coiw. re Paym for Oper. und r Act of 1964 during FY 1970- 71 . Econ.Opport. ct of '64. / Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Callahan, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the recommendation of the Administrative Officer to authorize a one-year extension of the Agreement, dated July 22, 1968 and extended on July 22, 1969 between the County of Santa Barbara and Santa Barbara Community Action Commission for County participation and payment to the Commission of $500 . 00 per month for operation under the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 be, and t he same is hereby, confirmed, .for FY 1970- 71 , commencing July 1, 1970 and ending June 30, 1971; the Executive Officer of the Commission having approved subject extension. It i s furt her ordered that the County Auditor be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to draw his warrant at this time for payment of the $500 .00 per month contribution for the months of July, August, September, October and November, 1970, to bri ng the payments uptodate . Kecena. of Admin. Off. te continue C.urt Hetae Securit Services until appr x. Jen. 15, 1971. I Autheriznc Pat. ef Extra Werk Claim fr m c: Sanchez ~ Sen, I c. fer Santa Ynez Airp rt Read Pre. ( Appreal ef Plana ~Specs. fer KemGdelnc ef Ce.Ceurt Reuse Annex. . / November 23, 1970 In the Matter of Recommendation of Administrative Officer that Court House Security Services be Continued until Approximately January 15, 1971. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant , seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously , i t is ordered that the reconnnendation of the Administrative Officer, following a review of the requirements and upon unanimous request of the Judges of the Superior Court, to continue the Court House security services until approximately January 15 , 1971 be, and the same is hereby , confi rmed. It is further order ed that the Purchasing Agent be, and he is hereby , authorized and directed to obtain bids from detective agencies interested in providing this servi ce, and that the award be made by the Board following receipt of the bids . In the Matter of Authorizing Payment of ~xtra Work Claim from c. Sanchez and Son, Inc . against the County of Santa Barbara for Santa Ynez Airport Road Project No . 3027 . 2, as Amended , from $728 . 31 to $450 . 00 . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried u1'"'animously, it is ordered that the recommendatior1 of the County Counsel, Public Works Director , and Road Commission to aut orize the Cou'ty Auditor to make payment of an extra work claim from C. Sanchez and Sor , Inc. against the Cou ty of Santa Barbara for Santa Ynez Airport Road Project No . 3027. 2, as amended' y decreasing from the original amount of $728 .31 to $450 . 00 ~e , and the same is herety , confi~'1lled C. SaTchez & Sor., I c . gave formal notice ~y Jetter dated November 20, 1970 , in agreement to said modification of claim fiJed on October 13, 1970. In the Matter of Approval of rlans and Specifications for Remodeling of t he County Luilding (Court House Annex) Located at 118 East Figueroa Street, Santa Barbara . Norman H. Caldwell, Director of Public Works, explained that the long range planwill be to convert the building completely to a Municipal Courts :Bui lding in two pJ-,.ases , the major step being in the first phase . Because of t he structure of the building , the only place for ~vo large courtrooms is on the seco d floor . The District Attorney ' s offices will be left in t his buildi ng after the first phase but t he space will be changed around . T~e other department to be left in t he building l;vill :.,e Mu,. icipal Court. Superior Court Judge Joseph T. Lodge made a presentation, explaining the tremendous increase in case load . In analyzing the statistics, it is . noted that they are working harder with a heavier case load per judge than Los Angeles Coun.ty, ar d have had to bring in other judges from time to time . Also , the increase is not from Isla Vista cases . Judge Lodge pointed out t he need for four court s instead of the three, as another place will be needed for another judge. They are even using space in t he baseme t of the tuilding, so whatever space can ie utilized will help during the construction p~ase . 3 09 310 November 23, 1970 Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and . carried unanimous l y, it is or dered tha t Thursday, December 17, 1970, at 3 o ' clock, p .m. be, and t he same is hereby, set as t he date and time for t he opening of bids on "Remodeling of The County Buil ding, 118 East Figuer oa Street, Sant a Bar bar a" (Court House Annex), and that notice be given by publication i n t he Santa Barbara News-Press, a newspaper of general circul ation, as follows, t o wit: bids for - NOTICE TO BIDDERS Notice is hereby given that t he County of Sant a Barba r a will receive ''Remodeling of The Courity Buil ding, 118 East Fi gueroa , Santa Barbara, California'' Each bid will be in accordance with drawings and specifications approved by the Board of Supervisors and on file in the OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, COUNTY ENGINEERING BUILDING, 123 EAST ANAPAMU STREET, SANTA BARBARA, CALIFORNIA, WHERE THEY MAY BE EXAMINED . Prospective bidders may secure copies of s aid drawings and specifica tions from t he OFFICE OF THE ARCHITECT, CHARLES K. SCHMANDT ARCHITECTS, 100 WEST MICHELTORENA STREET, SANTA BARBARA, CALIFORNIA 93104, upon depositing $40 .00 for each set of documents , which deposit will be returned if s aid drawings ar d s pecifications are retur ned complete and i n good condition to t he offices of the Pr chitect within ten (10) days af ter t he opening of the bids . Pursuant t o the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California (Amended by Statutes 1968, Chapter 699 , Paragraph 1, opercrtive July 1 , 1969) the Board of Supervisors of t he County of SaP t a Barbara has directed t he publishing of t he prevai l i ng r ate of wages with a copy of the s ame being on file at the office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors . EACH BID SHALL BE MADE OUT ON A FORM TO BE OBTAINED AT THE OFFICE OF THE ARCHITECT; shall be accompanied by a certified or cashier ' s check or bid bor d f or ten (10) percent of the amount of the bid , made payable to the or der of the Treasurer of Sant a Barbar a County, Sant a Barbar a , California ; shall be . sealed an.d received i n the Office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Sant a Barbara County, County Administration Buil ding, 105 East Anapamu Street, Sant a Barbar a , California , 93104, on or before 3:00 P .M. on the 17th day of December, 1970, and will be opened and publ icly read aloud at 3:00 P.M. of the day i n t he Board of Supervisors ' Conference Room l ocated on t he 4th floor of the Sant a Barbar a County Administration Building . The above mentioned check or bond shall be given as a guar antee that the bidder will enter into the contract if awarded to him and will be declared forfeited if the successful bidder refuses to enter i nto s aid contract af t er being requested so to do by t he Board of Supervisors of s aid County . The Board of Supervisors of Sant a Barbara County reserves the right t o reject any or al l bids or waive any i nf ormality i n a bid. No bidder may withdraw his bid f or a period of t hirty (30) days af t er the date set for the opening thereof . Dat ed November 23 , 1970 J . E. LE\vIS (SEAL) Petitien frem Prope ty Owners - Residents f Alendra Dr. - Other Pretestn& Illesal Motercycle Ridin& o Se.Pac.IUl Ri&ht- f-Way. 11 Novemter 23, 1970 In the Metter of Petition from Property Owr.ers and Residents of Alondra Drive and Ot her Street Protesting I l legal Mot orcycle Riding on Southern Pacific Ra i l r oad Right-of Way, Third Supervisorial District . A petition was filed with the Board, and r ead by the Clerk, from Carl O. Wanless and 21 ot her property owners protesting the illegal motorcycle riding on t he right-of-way of the Southern Pacific Railroad in the Goleta area , being property owners and residents of Alondra Drive and other streets bordering the area . Riders are becoming a public nuisance, disturbing the peace, and create a great deal of dust, noise and smoke . They are del iberatel y violating the law in three ways, which were itemized; i . e . California Penal Code 369-G; Sant a Barbara County Ordinance No . 2107, , and posting of 26 ''No Trespassing" signs between Fairview Avenue and the S. P .R.R. by Special Agent in Goleta depot on October 29, 1970. Mrs . Wanless appeared and stated there is another area in the Magnolia Shopping Center out to El Camino School that is havi ng this trouble. Captain Joel Honey of the Criminal Division of the County Sheriff ' s Department stated he was contacted by Mrs . Wanless on November 16, 1970. He proceeded to send out a memorandum, which he read to the Board in full, to the mor ni ng and afternoon patrol shifts, on the s ame date . He had officers out there this weekend also . During the ensuing discussion about the need to find an area to allow this activity i n a legal manner, it was stated that this had been referred to the Planni ng Department, and the Planning Director said they are working on a l and use proposal, and they should find a site that will solve the problem. However , the big problem appears to be the matter of getting the cycles and bikes to the sites or locations . There will be a hearing set about conditional use permit or var~ance types 0f district s, but this is only part of the answer . There has to be an applicant to have r ace tracks on private property. Another area in which there is difficulty i n enforcing the l aw is the western side of Hope Ranch i n More Mesa. Supervisor Grant pointed out that ,permission had been granted by the landowner at More Mesa t o use the property for model airplane activity . It was pointed out that many of the bikes are not licensed and County Ordinance No . 2107 should be enforced . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the Sheriff to continue with his program of surveillance on subject matter and to enforce County Ordinance No . 2107, including the issuance of citations . It is further ordered that the Planning Department and Planning Commissi on proceed to attempt to find a suitable location through coordination with property owners f or such motorcycle activity 311. 312 Prepesal ef Paul Relis re Cenm. te Rest Gen.Plan Zenin& West e Ellweod. I dy Ord. #2138 Amendn& S.B. Ce.Cede te Delete Certai Exemptiens te Transient Occ p. Tax. Present. by Dr.Jen Wheatl y ef Isla Vista Cemm.Ceun. Matters. November 23, 1970 In the Matter of Proposal of Peul Relis that Committee be Formed to Restudy the General Plan and Zoning West of Ellwood. Subject communication was received by the Board and read by the Clerk, that until such a committee is engaged in the study and has presented its results, that no further development be considered in the a~ea . A communication from the Santa Barbara County Farm Bureau was also received by the Board and read by the Clerk, and submitted names of some property owners who would serve on such a committee . H. H. Divelbiss, Planning Director, pointed out that with the growing interest in the general plan to reex~mine plans, they have started putting together a possible project . Staff time is going to be a very important factor as this takes a lot of time and study ; and there is the matter of priorities in the different areas of the County. It is hoped to have a synopsis on the matter at the beginning of the year as to how much time it will take, and the scope of the problem. Many agencies such as water districts, school districts, sewer districts, roads, parks, and public utilities have been worki ng on the plan for several years . The reactivation of a citizen' s committee will be required. A det ailed.in-depth analys is is involved in the study aid will require consultant servi ces . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell , and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to the Planning Commission and Planning Director for submission of a report and recommendation sometime in January 1971 In the Matter of Ordi nance No . 2138 - An Ordinance Amending the Santa Barbara County Code to Delete Certain Exemptions to Transient Occupancy Tax . William P. Gawzner, Secretary of the Greater Santa Barbara Hotel Motel Association, submitted a communication with.a suggestion that Section 32-13 of the County Code (Ordinance 1570) regarding exemptions to transient occupancy tax be changed. Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, the Board passed and adopted Ordinance No . 2138 of the County of Santa Barbara , entitled "An Ordinance Amending the Santa Barbara County Code to Delete Certain Exemptions to Transient Occupancy Tax. " Upon the roll being called, the following Supervisors voted Aye, to-wit: . George H. Clyde, Joe J . Callahan, Daniel G. Grant, and Curtis Tunnell . NOES: None . ABSENT: Curtis Tunnell . In the Matter of Presentation by Dr . Jon Wheatley of tl:'e Isla Vist a Community Council on Isla Vista Matters . Dr . Jan Wheatley made a presentation by reading from a written report . One point raised that money raised in a community such as Isla Vista should be spent i n and for that community . The important point is that Isla Vista should begin to get value for its t ax dollars . November 23, 1970 Dr. Wheatley ' s first recommendation is for a change of point of view rather than specific legislation. He suggested the Board drop its view held previously that Isla Vista is just another bit of the County, different from Solvang,only i n location. Isla Vista has special zoning designed for and used only in Isla Vista, there have been special curfews, special police attention, etc . Isla Vista is very different from the rest of the county . It has higher density giving what is really an urban environment, it has an atypical age mix, housing is primarily rented rather than owneroccupied, the lots are smaller than elsewhere, etc . Isla Vista is unique in the County and needs corresponding treatment . The ''SR'' zoning ordinances should be rewritten due to local experience and the various reports made lately or to be made on Isla Vista . This should be done on the basis of detailed consultation with the IVCC Peace Commission. The most obvious area for immediate change is i n the soundproofing requirements on new apartment construction . Also , as a consequence of high density living, much more money must be provided for street clearing and general cleanup than is presently available from the special assessment for the Isla Vista Sanitary Distr ict . Also, street lighting must be improved. Isla Vista has the highest crime rate in the County; it has a very heavy pedestrian and bicycle traffic with inadequate street lighting . Dr. Wheatley's second recommencation is that the Board recognize IVCC as its primary advisory board i n Isla Vista; and that it pay Councilmen and the Commissioners appointed by the Council, and provide a budget for normal running expenses of the Council . One of the main troubles with the Council so far has been that Councilmen have had to e arn their living as well as work on the Council . To be an effective Secretary-Treasurer is a fulltime job . The same applies to at least two of the present jobs as Commissioners . If these jobs remain unpaid, they cannot be properly done . The third recommendation is that the County purchase not only Perfect Park but the whole area not now bui lt on from Pardall to the top of the loop; that the County develop and maintain this property as an interconnecting set of parks . Perfect Park enjoys so much use that it is almost impossible to grow gr ass . The money is available - it lies i n unaccounted- for school taxes going back some years . . Dr . Wheatly concluded by making a further general recommendation which can be implemented at no cost . There is nothi ng insurmountable about Isla Vista or its problems - they are just highly challenging. Isla Vista is an urban area smack in the middle of a ~argely rural county, and that makes for interesting problems . This last makes it a model for university towns all over the United States . For the Board of Supervisors t o preside over some really enlightened policies developed in Isla Vista and for Isla Vista is surely an enormous challenge, having all the rewards that meeting such a challenge successfully involves . Di scuss ion ensued as t o who 'tlould replace Dr . Wheatley on the IVCC as official liaison 'tlitb. t he Board . It was mentioned that there is the high - 313 314 Allewance f Claims. ' Requests for Apprep . ,Cance or Revision f Funds. I November 23, 1970 imagination and difficulty in dealing with idealism. !here will be radi ~ al happenings because they are uptried or experimented with. ~ Itwas suggested by Supervisor Grant that perhaps the County Cour sel could explore some special iegislation in SacrameDto to recognize this to free Isla Vista from the stereotyped County level, more of a self- rule. One of the basic problems, however, is coming up with a plan that the legislators will listen to . There might be some unique approaches that ~uld be appealing. Leslie Baird from the Isla Vista Association said the community of Isla Vista owes ? great deal to Dr .Wheatly and complimented him on his efforts . Upon moti9n of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, referred to County Counsel in coordination with Administrative Officer and other department s to cooperate with the Isla Vista Community Council to explore and prepare appropriate special legislation to provide some type of self- rule local governmeQt for the community in some form or another, and report back to the Board 't'lith recommendations . . I The Board recessed until.2 .' clock, Em At 2 o ' clock, p .m., the Board reconvened . Present: Supervisors George H. Clyde, Joe , J . Callahan, Daniel G. Grant 1 and Curtis Tunnell, and J . E. Lewis 2 Clerk; Supervisor Clyde iQ the Chair In the Matter of Allowance of Clair{is . Upon motion, duly seconded, and carried unanimou$ly, it is ordered that the ~ol l owing claims be, and the same are hereby allowed, each claim for the amount and payable out ot the fund designated on the face of each claim, respectively, to-wit: . . I ' ' of Funds . (SEE CLAIMS LIST ON PAGE 315) Upon the roll being called, the following Supervisors voted Aye, to-wit: George H. Clyde, Joe J . Callahan, Dani el G. Grant, and Curtis Tunnell NOES: None . . ' ABSENT: Francis H. Beattie . . In the Matter of Requests for Appropriation, Cancetlation or Revision , . . Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, .seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, the following requeats for appropriation, cancellation or revision of funds are hereby approved, in the budget classifications and amounts shown, and the Auditor be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to make the necessary transfers: 315 November 23, 1970 . . . - . . . ., ' ' ' I I ~ . AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANTA BARBARA COUNTY FUND-===------~DATE NUMBER I PAYEE I 11111 11112 UlQ llllt . IUll ._ . ._ 11111 . MMrMa J.1111 llliiida an llUI lllfl 11111 Ulf I lnti llltl llllt &a . .__ . e. . - . 11167 tllilllllill ._ Intl ~ Wta . . . _ UU 11178 11171 11171 lll7J 1117 llJ.71 lll"N c.11 a~ u 11171 11179 . caMlmU UllJ. ct.tr _, , 11111 11Ut ~ IUU IWiaa .i 11181 Kleid 11117 , . a . a.-~ 11111 . r I cate-- llUO . a AC-1157 PURPOSE .-. - . .--, .-. .-._ ~-. . . . . . llllal8 llRe1 i.llbf SYMBOL , 1821 1912 ',_ DM 11a11 uan u uau uau aas . a. , 17 a I 71 a I , WARRANT ALLOWED FOR . 11. 111.u u.a .n n. 7 117.U ., . 111.H 111.n U.OI , . . u . 111.u , . l.7S . . . . u.u 1.n.11 - 171 . . ,.,. ., . u . w.11 REMARKS I ~ . , ' AUDITOR'S. WARRANT REGISTER r SANTA BARBARA COUNTY FUND _. - ' NUMBER llUl IQ.ea ann UlM PAYEE ~. l'ii . . lldld . . .u - ltlll .' . PURPOSE UUI et11& Ill., .aL . UUI -.M lal7 Ulla i.- 11 1m1 11211 IWI 1111 11111 11111 11117 1111 llt' 11111 I Ulll llU 11111 IDI& 11117 AC-1!57 . L. a. - - . .,. . . 11111911 . .,.r.Ojiirja- . . . . - . . . __ , . . , . .u . . .-.i- . SYMBOL , I . . ,. aue ,. ., na ue ,. ' , teall . . 111 ioian , I.ti ll . UJaS uaaa 111 a II -a WARRANT ALLOWED FOR 11. 11.11 .,. . . . 111.u 114:.tl ~U. I ie.11 . u . , i.m.n , . u . 11.71 117.-71 111.M ~- u. ., . ., . i. ~11 411 . ' REMARKS . u . AUDITOR'S. WARRANT REGISTER / SANTA BARBARA COUNTY FUND _'---_ ___ DATE N UMBER I JDll . 111 1 tllM . II UIM PAYEE ~~-- ' " -.a: llllrJJ.& it . . - . - - - 1at1 m111. Ulll , 1111 ,1 inn , . AJ.llililil . m . e, u. t.-.s.- - .-. , .[ altf . ui . 11111 ~-. A Cl!S7 PURPOSE . - - . - - SYMBOL "'., JM.' ur n ue a a ll.tU IJau Ill II ~I 114 a II u, 1971 WARRANT ALLOWED FOR 17S.ll 71.40 iee . UI . 111.M - n.u IQ.II in. ., . I REMARKS ' 111.79 uo. la . lb II 1.71 . ,. 118.14 111.u. . , u. u.at 17.ll M11 fl.II lllaMU.Nft . .u :uu: tl.a \ , . ) . 1AUDITOR:S WARRANT REGISTER , / ,- SANTA BARBARA CO,U NTY DATE~~~---"'-- FUND -- I PAYEE PURPOSE SYMBOL WARRANT NUMBER ALLOWED FOR REMARKS UIU . Ill J w. . ., . , lfalll U.M ., . . Il l a. . t l.lJU. uta1Mtt.aa lllJS Utan ., . ,., .,. . 1111 ., Jllft . u. . . 11171 . - . *"* . M.7 . ., . u.u . Ulll . UID JlllUll !mt uu i.- . . . I 'WUAI. UMI ,. m ~- DIM . 0 L a ., . ~ ~ . . . mau _ . u . 11111 ,.w --. . . . . u . , ., . , ,. / 11119 . u ,,". 14 , .a . UlI UMt . - . . UIM 1 . . . 1 . llMI t.u .au. _ UM . uaan . Jl.,P AC I 157 ' . . ' t r' AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANTA BARBARA COUNTY , FUND--~----_ _.D.ATE ' ' . . NUMBER 11111 . 11111 11111 11111 UIJA. WU 111U llllY II.Al 11111 111 111 IU14 18* ~ 11111 11117 ll IU. UUI 111n w um IUB Ultl 111tl IUtl 3 llltl , . UNI UMI UJlt 'I IJltt A C-1!57 . . .---1. a. , . ., . . - ._.a - . w 1.--.w - WUUila , . .SU. 011 . .i. YalM!r . < . . . . PURPOSE , . . - . ' SYMBOL 111 - JllaM 111 au - - . 111 ll 1au 111 au IM ant WARRANT ALLOWED FOR 1.ie U. . ,. . ,. . - aa. u . . . . . . n. u. . ." " n. U. '.'*. LM ' REMARKS . . . ' AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANTA BARBARA COUNTY N UMBER I PAYEE PURPOSE I ' - :- , .,~ ,.'~ 11111 ~' " 11111 Id lllU IDM 11111 1119' 11117 J.U9 , . . . ~ . ~ DIM _, _ uat ~-. . UllJ . II.a a 11171 ann JAii 11m lllM 11171 .,. .,. . . .,. _au . . . . _. . . . 11n 111 INH 11111 Ulll um &ml UIM 1191 ".=.-.' . AC-187 m&M . . . waua.-.- . . ,. . llllWill au SYMBOL 111a 111a11 t5 UJU ' ~ 1118 I UtaU WARRANT ALLOWED FOR 111. ., . . . . , . u SR 11a.11 ue.1.e 11.M 7".?l a.u IM . ue. . UL 1111. . , I REMARKS w.u . I NUMBER I PAYEE AUDITOR~S WARRANT REGISTER SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ' _____ _DATE _____ U_._J.I,. PURPOSE SYMBOL WARRANT ALLOWED FOR 11111 ----- m. . ,. &1411 lltU 11411 AC-1!57 ctilde . . ,.,_ . -.u. - .a. . -.u&ma-. . . . .p. .r. . . r. . eta-~ UIM611Wtl9 a.a . .,. . Jtl e.ut. ~ . ftill* . W&.Ulllll a ._ :as. u1au . 111 a a a 11 , . !Mal 1". ta -8 - n Ul819 i.-.n , 1. . . , , . .,. . u 171.M - . . . Ill.JI . . ILM 111.u U.M IN Ut.M ,. 117 . Ul.'1 411. . I REMARKS . . NUMBER ' r' i. I I { ' - AC-1!57 . - )'. -".;!' i\UDITOR'S' WARRANT REGISTER ~ SANTA BARBARA COUNTY FUND . 1119.__ _ _____:_. _ -.lJDATE_.= PURPOSE \ I ' ' . . ' SYMBOL l ,a I , . , . ea-I . . n uaa uat ,_, , , Yaa .3. naa " 11aa r USI 11 a 1. - If U.H .M DaM llaM 718M AM MM lei M Ula M ueaM D. Uft WARRANT ALLOWED FOR . , ~ 14 lt . u.ae &ft.II . . ,. 111.U i. . .''.' lLfl e.u U.IS (1, , . a.u II.a! , . 11 1a.a1 . Q.M . . i- I , REMARKS cc 5 a . 'fl! l ; t w _ c :esw . ' ' ' AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER . . SANT A BARBARA COUNTY NUMBER PAYEE PURPOSE SYMBOL WARRANT ALLOWED FOR REMARKS _ _.,. . , ,, ' .~ , -.! . . w. ., . maw uaau UtalA ma 14 . JA u.a &PJA YM.19 ' Ii' ~ .;4; AC-157 NUMBER Diii Dal AC.157 ; ', . " YEE Y' 'l' '1' , . . . AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANTA BARBARA COUNTY FUND~~-'-~~-'--~~~-i.DATE~~~~--~"-. PURPOSE SYMBOL - WARRANT ALLOWED FOR a.a . ._ ' . . . ' MtaU u.41 su.n n.w . q.,q \ REMARKS r AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER ' SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ' 1 FUND--======---- LJDATE N U MBER PAYEE PURPOSE SYMBOL lltll. ~,:-.:, II a I 11n . ' 111 SIA t ltl IMl7 ~ _ . ' . . lltll . , . . -- -- , , ' . . - A C-1!57 u. U7e . ' WARRANT ALLOWED FOR REMARKS . i. . . lt.17 . u 111.u 111.2 111. a11. 111.u m.u -- ua.11 117 Mm.M lt7 a 1 UIY. 11.171.11 117 C I 111.81 i,.n . . - -. ---.-, -- - - ' NUMBER . . - ; ' ~ FUN PAYEE , . ' - [ I ~~-- -- - . ' . l -t . AUDITOR'S WARRANT" REGISTER I r :{ SANTA B ;\MARA COUNTY ' ' , , . . PURPOSE SYMBOL ' ' WARRANT ALLOWED FOR ; . . . . 1 lltll ----- Uilll . IMll ' ACl!57 ou-. .u . 0 . . " ~. Madi 114.M .a.11 1.,1-.n i.w.7t ., REMARKS . ' I - - - ' . . . . AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER . FUND IAS. J NUMBER PAYEE J:ftM ~.-.*1Nitia ~-~ ., . .u n 6 , - ~ 89MI ~ . 611 , ., ~tlM ~ . ., _ . ftaa1Uui. .ill. .i. . . . . WiUta ._ 1lilUillit o. ~ . . I;. . . c . . a tll1 ~ Oetcra ~ OtM ,__A\;_, J ~ . ~ , .a. ~ . . ~ . . .a"'' ~ .,. . ~ . , - a 0111. 1-.itae lwW. ~ -ia ,. ~ .Ma a. -i AC-1157 ' .' SANTA .BARBARA COUNTY PURPOSE t DATE SYMBOL 10 . . . HA 11 UAIO MAIO . .,. . . . - ' WARRANT ALLOWED FOR ll.41 u .a . n 19 17.U . . , 11.11 44.Tt 14.M U.M .,. . If .Sf . lt.Mt . . ,. . , M.at a.11 . , u . 11.J 41.to . M.N 7.11 1 . lll.M 16.it . , "" . J # ., REMARKS T ' AC-1!57 r - - "": - - . ! . ~ AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER ' SANTA BARBARA COUNTY '* ,, -. " . . I NUMBER PAYEE . . -. ~ \. ' t . " ~. AC-1!57 "t AUDITOR'S WARRANT REGISTER SANTA BARBARA COUNTY FUND~~l!lllT~~_:.c__:__:__~-LDATE,~ PURPOSE SYMBOL ' ,_ . . i . . , . r \ u. 11'71 WARRANT ALLOWED FOR .MY.n 11 1a.11 na. m.n iea . -~- ~ . . " REMARKS 31.6 ~ . . ~earo~d "Rn e!ia!fer~ar Majectic Trac -Annex. of Wal r Park-Majectic Tract.Resolut- 1 Fermn& " Esta Spec. Lightn& Zene #1 in Ce. Serv. Area #5. Waller ParkMaj ectic Trac I November 23, 1970 SUMMARY OF REQU:.STS FOR TR.A,NSFER OF FUNDS Public Works Departmert - Veterars Memorial Building Request transfer of $374 .05 from 185 C 1 to 185 B 9 to cover cost of repairs to three lawnmo~iers and one edger . Amount originally budgeted in C-1 account to purchase new mower. which is not now needed. Sheriff - Detention Facilities Request deviation of funds to purchase equipment for new jail as follows: 1 Acme Visible Flex- o- line i ndex 1 Reel type power lawnmower 1 Floor buff er Additional. funds are not required Sheriff - Detention Facilities Request transfer of $1,100 from Appropiation for Cortingencies and approval of deviation of funds to purchase the following equipment for new jail: 1 Double drawer f i le card cabi net 2 Super Sealmast er with work t ables 4 Rolls - polyethylene tubi ng 1 Stock pot with flat cover - 80 qt. 1 Stock pot with flat cover - 60 quart 2 Dollies for St ock Pot, metal, heavy duty 7 Clothes t rees with 4 hooks, wood 1 Bogan CHS 35 Amp . & 1 Electrovoice 1 No . 623 Microphone with s t and Sheriff - Detention Facilities Request deviation of funds to purchase dry cleani~g equipment for new j ail facility . Additional funds are not requested . Auditor-Controller Request transfer i n the amount of $7,000 from 5 A 1 Regular Salaries to 5 A 4 Extra Help and/or Labor . In t he Matter of Hearing on Proposed Annexation of Waller ParkMaj es tic Tract to County Service Area No . 5, Fifth Supervisorial District . This bei ng the date and time set for hearing on subject proposal; the Affidavit of Publication, the Affidavit of Posting, and Proof of Mailing bei ng on file with the Clerk; - CoIIllilunications were received and read by the Clerk from Mrs . Morris Osborn and John Simpson of Santa Mari a protesting the street light installation as the notice to property owners affected does not mention cost to the property owners, etc . There being no further appearances or written statements submitted for or against subject proposal; Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: In the Matter of Annexation of Waller Park-Majestic Tract to County Service Area No. 5 . RESOLUTION NO . 70- 717 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE) In the Matter of Forming and Establishing Special Lighting Zone No . 1 in County Service Area No . 5 , Waller Park-Majestic Tract, Fifth Supervisorial District . Hearns on Prepesed Annex. of Park View Subdiv. " Tract #11,089. Annex. ef ParkTiew Subdiv. " Tract #11,089 te Ce.Serv. Area #5 Reselutien. Fermnc " Estab. Spe Li&htng Zene #2 in Ce.Serv.Area #5, Parkview Subdiv. " Tract #11,089. Hearn& en Appeal f Mra.C.J.Loyer, Jr. from Plann.CIND. Rece111111. for ApprOTa ef Cend.Except. fer 90-Day Use ef Trail r Santa Ynez Valle)j November 23, 1970 Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, secor ded by Supervisor Grant , and carried ur animously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLUTION NO . 70- 718 (ORIGINAL IN PERMP.NENr FILE} In the Matter of Hearing on Proposed Annexation of Park Vie"w' Subdivision and Tract #11,089 to County Service Area No . 5, Fifth Supervisorial District. This being the date and time set for hearing on subject proposal; the Affidavit of Publication, Affidavit of Posting, and Proof of Mailing being on file with the Clerk; Comr:nunicatior.s were received from Elwin E. Mussell and John L. Mussell protesting proposed annexation as the land owned by them is open land and has not been developed and would not benefit from proposed annexation. There being no further appearances or written statements submitted for or against subject proposal; Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell; seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unani mously, the following resolution was passed and adopted: In the Matter of Annexation of Parkview Subdivision and Tract #11,089 to County Service Area No . 5 . - RESOLTUION NO . 70-719 (ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE2 - In the Matter of Forming and Establishing Special Lighting Zone No . 2 in County Service Area No . 5, Parkview Subdivision and Tract #11 ,089, Fifth Supervisorial Di strict . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously; the following resolution was passed and adopted: RESOLl.IT ION NO . 70-720 {ORIGINAL IN PERMANENT FILE2 In the Matter of Hearing on Appeal from Mrs . C. J . Loyer, Jr . . (70-V- 56) from Planning Commission Recommendation for Approval of Conditional Exception for 90- Day Period to Use Trailer as Permanent Dwelling on Property Located Approximately 1,320 Feet Westerly of Ballard Canyon Road and 1 . 7 Miles Northerly of Chalk Hill Road, Santa Ynez Valley . This being the date and time set for hearing on s ubject proposal ; the Affidavit of Publication being on file with the Clerk; A letter was received from Mrs . Charles J . Loyer, Jr . requesting the withdrawal of their appeal from the Board agenda as the problem has been solved. Mr. and Mrs . Ed;qard W. Rife submitted a letter, which was read by the Clerk, to the effect that the use of trailers should be limited to established trailer parks as set forth by county ordinance . The decision of the Planning Commission should be withheld as the use of the trailer as a permanent residence for C. J . Loyer, Jr . would be a detriment to the integrity of the ) 3:1.7 318 Cont. Hearne. on Appeal ef Raymend E. Spencer en behalf of P.A.Anderaen. I November 23, 1970 area and lead to a general decline of the property nearby . H. H. Divelbiss, Planning Director , gave the backgrourd on the matter, stating that since filing the appeal , the appellants have been able to satisfy the Building Department that this trailer is in fact constructed to meet building code requirements . Bruce Benedict, owner of 10 acres immediately east of the subject property, stated that it wll always be a trailer, and the zoning restrictions on the area do not allow them for permanent residents . During the discussion, it was pointed out that this trailer ceases to be one when it complies with all the requirements of a structure under the building code . This would involve removal of the wheels , and placement of a foundation underneath While this would not be a bad looking structure when completed, it might set a precedent for the area and others would not be as attr active It was suggested that the Planning Department make a study on the matter of converting trailers into permanent structures as there is a definite trend in this direction. J . Burchardi, property owner immediately south and west of this area in question, said the conditional use permit was based on the occupants being required to get a building permit before they can live in the trailer . How can they have the electricity for conditional use without a building permit being issued? There should be some method of policing or protection with the trend of modular trailers moving in. The 5- acre agricultural lots do not lend themselves to anyone making a living on them. It was pointed out that the only permit given was for a permit for a septic tank and power pole but there was none given for occupancy, so this raises a question. It was pointed out that there is nothing to prevent a person from putting up a pole for watering stock on agricultural land so that is how a permit could be issued for a temporary pole . There being no further appearances or written statements submitted for or against subject proposal: Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor TuPnell , and carried unanimously , it is ordered that subject matter be, and the same is hereby, removed from the agenda at the request of the appellant . In the Matter of Continued Hearing on Appeal of Raymond E. Spencer on behalf of P. A. Andersen from Planning Commission Denial of Request for Condi- tional Exception and Side Yard Adjustment on Property at 1185 Anderson Lane, Goleta (70-V- 44) This being the date and time set for the continued hearing on subject proposal; H. H. Divelbiss, Planning Director, pointed out the_ property from a transparency in the More Mesa area of Goleta Valley . Parcel ''A'' has an existing 8-unit apartment building on the property which contains 32,000 square feet proposed to be created by this particular lot split . This was acted upon by the Subdivision Committee and pending the variance to create a parcel with 8 units on it rather than the normal size single family residential type of parcel The lot split was approved subject to the variance, and the Planning Commission I November 23, 1970 denied the variance . Should the Board grant a variance, the lot split wil l 1 ' 1 a ~so ~e ~pprovcr . ~~e c:e~k read t~ ~ Zo .i~g ~~port of the Planni ng Coi1ls sicn dated In Favor ' I Tli.er ~ \ 1: 1 J ,., . ~". c 11' .; ~ .!.. - e c11rr 1.t 1 an l '!.S e ~ s t '1e la-.d being retained is currently planted in avocad?s Division of the property will al low the applicant mor e time t o devote to the orc ~ ard . 2) The existing 8- unit building is legal non- c.-)nforming and complied with all rules and regulations when bu' ilt . 3) A lot split may no~ be needed because a record of survey was filed in 1955 . (County Counsel ruled that this did not legally constitute a division. ) In Opposition 1) Residents in the area have consistently and emphatically opposed any and al l pr ospective compr omises of t he diatrict zoning requirements . 2) I ncreased density will encourage downgrading of zoni ng in the area . 3) The pr oposed vision lines could be adjusted to allow t he required area for the existing 8-unit building (approximately 160,000 sq . ft . ) . 4) The effect of appr oval would be t o rezone t he pr operty t hrough t he lot split procedure 5) Anderson Lane is a narr ow (25 feet) private road maintained by pr operty owners . I ncreased density will create a traffic hazard; be a burden on t hese owners; encour age developers to downgrade the area ; and c ause a problem because of the lack of sewers . A communication was received and read by the Clerk from John M Groebli, 5399 Derwin Lane, More Mesa, in opposition to granting the appeal . A petition cont a i ni ng 20 signatures was received and read by the Clerk, in favor of granting the lot split , variance, conditional exception and side yard adjustment on t he following grounds: 1) Mr . Ardersen has a valid legal non-conf orming use for t he parcel proposed t o be divided for apart ment house pur pose and is entitled to continue to use the property as such 2) The balance of the property is now being used for agricultural uses . 3) That t o require a lot of 160,000 sqare feet as specified by the Pl annin~ Commission would deprive Mr. Andersen of his property without due process of law and would deny equal protection of the laws . Attorney J ames R. Christiansen made a presentation on behalf of the appellant, a d pointed to a colored map showing the location of the property . Other maps were also filed with the Clerk . He said that when this property was developed by Mr. Andersen for this apartment house, the property was then A-1 zoning which was intended es. a buffer zone between heavy i ndustrial and average residential . I n May 1955 a record of survey was recorded for this property; and Mr . Christiansen 319 320 November 23, 1970 filed a copy of same with the Clerk. In using the various maps to give the background, he said there is a valid lot existing for the apartment house, although narrower and longer. An aeri al map filed with the Clerk showed the existing line and the proposed lot split line . The contention is that there is to be 160,000 square feet devoted to this apartment house and people in opposition have been misled on this . He poi nted out the line that was established in May of 1955 . Another line was established when Parcel .#2 was sold. In requesting the adjustment in the lot lines as presently exists , he pointed out that the appellant has a valid , lawful , non- conforming use for this property under due process . More land will be devoted to this apartment house than previously exi sted . ~1r . Christiansen requested deletion from the lot split committee recommendations the reference to an illegal condition. The follo"tiing persons appeared on subject matter : Paul MacDougall, resident of Rancho Del Ciervo Estates - in favor of appellant ' s request C. K. Dorwin, owner of 10 acres south of appellant ' s property - while not in favor of the apartment house at the time it was built , the appellant was within his rights to build accordi ng to the existing zoning then, but the Board should determine what s i ze it should be . P . A. Andersen, the appellant - there are people who are in favor of his proposal that could have been here today for approval of this lot split . c, E. Moser, residing at 1475 Anderson Lane - he feels the 32,000 square- foot area for t he apartment house is too small . He is concerned ~'1 ith what "t-1ill happen when the ~.,hole area is filled i n. Cons i deration must be givan to children playing in the open area. The Planning Commission gave Mr . Andersen several opportunities to submit a plan which would upgrade the zoning and put in more footage, but this has never been honored. It is up to the Board to decide what will be a feasible amount of ground for the apartment house . Bar bara Morrell, resident at 5311 Dorwi n Lane - people in the area have built their homes with the understanding that it would be one-half acre parcels . The children in the neighborhood have to play in the street because of no frontage . Mrs . Lester Spnds, residing at 5325 Derwin Lane - as a resident in the area for 10 years, she is concer nad about the avocados and doesnt want to see them destroyed. Mrs . Donna Moser, residing at 1475 Andersen Lane - as an architect- planner, she stated that there was to be no change in the use of the land. Mrs . Adeline Rohn of 1451 Andersen Lane - if the request is approved, she wondered if they would still have and maintain the one- half acre areas . Attorney Christiansen referred to the building plans, a copy of which was filed with the Clerk, that on the A-1 zoning, there is no lot size nor setback except from the center line of the street . Also, the 41,000 square feet \ General Electio Nov. 3, 1970 Results. November 23, 1970 320-A is not shown on the assessor ' s map . Raymond E. Spencer, Civil Engineer with U. S. Grant & Son, appeared on behalf of Mr . Andersen, and referred t o the map of the January 1957 lot split with the ''Z" engineering symbol . He said the person who had prepared that map mentioned they were using this to show ownership . During his explanati on, he said he felt that the line is still valid. Attorney Christiansen referred to the County lot split ordinance from 1955 to date . Prior to July 27 , 1955, there was no lot split requirement ' on it . He again requested and received approval that all the documents including maps and building plans filed with the Clerk be introduced into evidence as a record of subject proceedi ngs . Supervisor Grant pointed out that, according to the County Counsel ' s office , this is a non- existing lot, so the Planning Commission was on sound grounds when the request was denied. This should properly be a rezoning matter for the 8- unit apartment house , but this would not be compatible with t he zoni ng on the property . There being no further appearances or wri tten statements submitted for or against subject proposal; Upon motion of Supervisor Grant, seconded by Supervisor Tunnell, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the appeal of Raymond E. Spencer on behalf of P. A. Andersen from Planning Commission denial of the following requests (70-V-44) on property described as a portion of Assessor ' s Parcel No . 65- 250-12, located on the east side of Anderson Lane, approximately 500 feet southerly of Shoreline Drive known as 1185 Anderson Lane, Goleta Valley be, and the same is hereby, denied, thereby reaffirming the action of the Planning Commission to deny subject requests on the basis that to allow 8 unit s on 32,000 sq . ft . of land area is contrary to the spirit and intent of t he 20-R- l District: 1) A Conditional Exception to allow an 8- unit, two- story legal non- conforming apartment house to remain on a proposed parcel with an area of 31,963 sq . ft . instead of 160,000 sq . ft . for eight (8) units . 2) An adjustment to allow a side yard setback of 13 .5 feet from the proposed nor therly property line instead of the 15 feet required for a two- story building . In the Matter of Declaring the Results of the November 3, 1970 General Election. J . E. Lewis, County Clerk, having been authorized by Resolution No . 70 - 530 to canvass returns of the November 3 , 1970 General Election, and J . E. Lewis, County Clerk having on the 19th day of November, 1970 , completed said canvass in accordance with law; Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, this Board hereby declares the results of the November 3, 1970 General Election to be as follo't'1S, to-wit: (SEE LIST PAGE 320-B) 329-B STATJ!MENT OP AJ.L VOTES CAST AT THE GENERAL ELECTION HEJJ) NOVBMBEI. 3, 1970 IN 36TH ASSDOll.Y DISTRICT IN SANTA BARBARA COUNTY STATE or CALIFORNIA . STATEMENT OF ALL V O T c~ CA~ T AT rHE GENERAL ELECTION NUVtMtltR .3 , 19 10 PAGt l GOVERNOK. L f. C,OVE:RNOR StL. lJF ~ T ATE REP OEM P/F A/I REP A/ I Gl:M P/ f A/I LtM P/ F KE:P T R u R s R H A H G 8 f J 0 t N 0 H E E l A L K t T A R M E I M \i A l.J 0 u A G u 0 A r. p u G [., w E F L A H R E I L N R l N E c s a u v K K T E J u 0 I: K R T J N E R 0 y c A s T PREC I NCT 001 297 185 103 4 4 189 6 97 2 6 1 33 2 150 - PREC I NCT 002 325 2 19 1 04 217 l 101 l 3 151 2 161 PRE CI NCT 003 292 137 142 3 4 142 5 13 4 2 6 173 3 101 PREC INCT 004 371 2 38 114 4 2 38 5 111 4 11 143 l 201 PREC INCT 005 257 117 127 6 5 120 7 12 1 2 s 152 4 86 PRt:CI NCT 006 334 13 4 1 81 9 l 133 6 180 4 10 Ll8 6 84 PREC I NCT 007 254 182 56 6 182 l So 8 3 12 8 166 PREC I NCT 008 336 201 122 4 3 224 l 10 1 0 7 138 7 178 PREC INl. T 009 256 183 64 4 1 188 2 56 5 5 75 6 1 61 PREC I NCT 0 10 425 22C 180 11 10 224 11 154 22 21 189 l c; 1 81 PREC I NCT 0 11 403 268 1 2 1 5 4 278 2 10 1 13 3 14 4 5 243 PREC I NCT 0 12 386 236 1 3 5 8 l 262 3 99 12 8 123 14 228 PRECI NCT 0 13 296 211 12 10 1 220 3 58 10 s 82 13 l d8 PRE:C INCT 0 14 2 72 171 91 3 4 184 4 76 5 8 1 07 3 146 PREC I NCT 0 15 422 266 140 6 2 279 3 116 13 10 160 9 231 PREC. I f\ICT 0 16 369 229 126 7 1 234 2 115 14 5 138 10 209 PRECI NCT 0 17 280 203 70 l 2 2 12 2 59 4 5 82 6 177 PREC INCT 0 18 3 85 267 104 7 l 281 4 89 7 b 133 5 234 PREC I NCT 0 19 463 250 180 19 5 263 2 146 33 7 189 2c; 2 14 PRE CINCT 020 473 286 174 5 4 298 8 146 11 20 Ll 2 c; Ll5 PREC I NCT 021 3 40 223 109 l 2 238 2 90 5 8 1 ~ 7 3 188 PREC I NCT 022 3 1 1 182 12 1 7 185 l 10 4 14 4 14 1 8 149 PREC INCT 0.23 408 229 163 8 3 245 4 143 12 7 189 16 189 PRl:C I NC l 024 4 06 .238 16 1 4 2. 251 7 139 5 13 l 75 l C 199 PREC I NCT 025 7 2 57 10 3 l ';) 7 l 11 l l 2 1 l 44 PRE CI NCT 026 108 75 21 2 3 78 24 5 5 30 t 67 PRE:C INCT 027 36L 2 49 110 262 4 94 8 13 J l LCd PREC I NCT 028 357 227 117 6 2.53 2 89 7 d 139 8 190 PR t C. INCT 029 3 72 259 1 01 5 3 261 5 88 7 10 128 6 Ll 4 PR t CINCT 030 3 10 175 112 5 8 188 8 100 6 7 136 6 1 51 PRE:C I NCT 031 388 230 139 8 6 238 9 130 8 9 176 10 188 PREC l NC.T 032 438 2 79 146 6 l 301 2 118 10 7 144 6 2b& PiEC INCT 033 418 256 142 12 3 210 4 117 19 7 l o 7 16 222 PREC I NCT 034 386 238 133 8 .246 2 12 1 10 2 165 9 199 PREC I NCT 035 302 168 126 4 176 3 112 4 l 148 2 133 PREC INCT 036 3~ 4 2 15 133 2 l 2 14 5 122 5 4 158 6 177 PREC INCT 037 393 259 117 3 4 267 3 112 10 148 2. 217 PREC INCT 038 3 35 220 1 04 4 3 230 l 91 9 11 152 0 1 54 PREC l NC.T 039 364 195 1 5 1 4 4 .2 15 6 129 1 b l7d 4 165 PREC I NCT 040 314 196 10 7 5 3 201 2 99 6 5 135 3 1 67 PREC I NCT 0 41 419 3 16 93 3 l 322 2 80 6 7 1 41 5 255 PREC I NCT 0 42 2 12 1 24 80 4 125 4 71 4 4 99 5 9 7 . PREC INCT 0 43 360 269 82 2. l 2 79 3 6 4 7 6 84 11 246 PREC I NCT 0 44 307 149 147 7 l 154 3 134 10 3 168 6 1 2.3 PREC INCT 045 291 198 82 3 4 207 3 74 2 9 l O'J 2. 169 . ~ T 0 T Al SU t t, 1 ~ T l l 5223 5219 113 164 347 l207 1933 9435 234 ~83 1 +5 72 3 18 3 1 ") . 5TATEMENT OF ALL VOTES CAST AT THt GE:NERAL ELElT l uN t~OVEMcE:R 3 , 19/0 PAlL l. ~OVERNOR LT. lUVER,.,OR SE:L . Of !: TATE: REP Dt:1'1 p /F A/1 RE:P A/I IJ E t- P/ F A/I l.,i:"1 P/F kt:.P T R u R s R H A H G 8 f- J 0 E N G H t: E L A 0 R E: T A R M E 1 tJ Q A L 0 u A G u 0 A N p u G 0 w t: f L A H R E I l N R L N E: c 5 0 0 v R K T E J u 0 t: R R T J N E R 0 y c A s T PREC INCT 0 46 287 75 193 8 1 73 14 177 1 10 203 7 52 PRECINCT 047 298 109 175 7 2 116 7 15 7 10 14 203 7 o 7 PRECINCT 0 48 207 90 106 5 1 94 7 98 5 6 109 4 83 PREC INCT 049 270 73 183 5 2 86 6 159 6 b l 9 't 5 53 PRECINCT 050 286 74 205 5 77 6 192 5 7 221 5 46 . PRE:CINCT 051 192 3 7 136 7 l 42 2 118 11 ,j 14? 4 2.7 PREC INCT 052 3 43 1 0~ 221 6 l 112 8 185 11 6 226 7 80 PREC INCT 053 320 147 157 7 3 148 8 142 14 13 173 11 116 PRE:C INCT 054 267 72 174 1 5 66 4 172 12 2 l 8Y l (I !4 PR EC INCT 055 178 43 11 5 9 45 4 109 6 l 118 9 34 PRECINCT 056 215 l OC 106 4 3 l.05 5 93 5 7 112 6 81 PRECINCT 057 357 168 174 5 2 185 4 149 12 l 183 7 14':1 PRE:CINCT 058 389 243 132 6 2 2?6 4 110 14 7 167 15 192 PREC INCT 059 307 175 11 6 5 l 1 81 5 104 3 14 l4l 4 l,j7 PRECINCT 060 275 13S 123 l C 2 143 3 118 1 9 l ,j2 8 119 PREC INCT 061 240 141 92 3 2 1 51 l dO 3 7 9 7 6 116 PREC INCT 062 276 l 5b 1 04 4 3 171 5 dB 5 7 11~ 6 136 PRECINCT 063 354 178 162 1 3 106 7 145 11 1 171 l b 14~ PRECINCT 064 297 12 ; 149 13 l 135 3 130 19 3 144 14 121 PREC I NCT 065 226 130 89 2 l 136 3 80 3 2 93 3 122 PRECINCT 066 347 221 110 4 1 229 3 103 4 7 13! 4 189 PREC INCT 067 354 188 153 3 3 1 97 9 12 7 10 9 169 11 155 PRECINCT 068 364 26C 99 2 2 10 2 81 2 12 l .28 2 15 PRECINCT 069 271 19 l 84 193 4 70 4 9 102 1 l !3 PRECINCT 0 70 255 179 67 5 190 l 58 3 7 96 l 147 PRECINCT 0 71 325 221 86 3 2 225 5 d l 4 15 100 5 l 9C PRECINCT 0 12 262 1 94 78 2 5 195 5 71 l 12 108 2. l"tb PRECINCT 073 338 213 110 5 l 216 2 95 11 2 130 9 18L PRtCINCT 074 324 201 1 01 2 l 209 7 96 5 13 141 3 1 ~5 PREC INCT 0 1 5 241 119 111 6 119 2 l Od 6 11 137 7 tl 4 PKECINCT 0 76 257 118 1.22 3 3 13 1 6 108 5 9 140 3 98 PH EC INCT 0 77 304 165 12 1 11 l 170 l 114 11 9 147 14 lL.2 PRECINCT 0 78 348 193 12.9 13 5 198 l 123 16 14 141 17 165 PR E:C INCT 0 79 309 153 143 9 l 1 5 7 5 126 11 3 158 l C 130 PREC INCT 080 338 191 131 6 3 193 9 122 5 9 161 t1 146 PRECINCT 081 274 172 94 2 l 177 3 87 3 lS l Od 7 137 PREC INCT 082 249 l Ol 128 9 3 99 5 127 13 7 143 8 8 l PREC INCT 08J 221 8: 123 ti 3 87 4 111 12 5 136 11 59 PRtC INCT 084 306 11.: 180 5 2 115 4 160 14 9 185 1.3 62 PRECINCT 085 237 100 129 3 3 105 5 110 1.2 4 124 l l ~8 PREC INCT 086 230 74 148 8 2 74 9 133 14 9 160 12 48 PRECI NCT 087 271 164 98 5 1 165 2. 92 6 9 108 6 135 PREC INCT 088 289 92 181 12 ~8 3 108 10 3 203 lG 59 PREC INCT 089 258 113 133 5 l 125 4 114 10 4 148 9 f10 PRECINCT 090 288 129 149 4 3 125 6 136 11 1 2 165 ; 92 PRECINCT 091 302 134 1 5 7 4 4 140 5 146 10 10 188 7 9 1 PREC I NCT 092 3 49 147 188 I 2 151 2. 177 9 9 21L 4 11.2 PRE:C IN CT 093 284 146 12.3 6 2 155 2 106 11 4 155 t: 106 PREC I NCT 094 4 0 5 168 2 ll. 13 2 175 7 187 25 8 247 13 1 .26 PRt:C I NCT 095 477 31 1 146 4 1 326 5 133 7 7 204 8 .251 - PRE:C INCT 096 3o7 198 1 51 7 2 215 4 133 11 6 164 9 179 PRECINCT 09 / 388 235 139 3 6 250 6 124 6 8 169 6 203 PRECINCT 098 284 152 122 3 l 152 2 llo 3 3 154 2 117 , PRECINCT 099 294 130 151 4 4 145 4 138 4 8 184 4 9 7 , PREC INCT 100 350 19 c; 139 2 3 213 6 12.0 5 11 17l 5 151 PR EC INCT 101 350 2 1( 133 3 .226 2 112 4 5 144 6 184 PREC INCT 102 337 17.t: 148 7 l 190 5 1L9 5 6 174 I:. 145 PRECINCT 103 366 .21 ~ 133 2 5 233 2 12.:S 2 7 164 192 PREC INCT 104 304 148 l3b 4 5 160 8 122 5 8 16l J 121 PR EC INCT 105 327 1 55 160 6 166 8 139 11 13 .1&2 5 12.l PKtCINCT 106 304 161 125 5 3 181 6 107 b 11 160 5 122 PRE CINCT 107 323 172 137 4 6 182 6 124 8 4 164 ' 142. PRECINCT 108 498 382 1 0 7 3 2 390 5 93 5 14 163 9 301 PRECINCT 109 399 282 106 4 ;l03 l 85 4 l 141 2 245 PRtCINCT 110 355 164 179 5 l 165 4 164 13 4 195 12 l 3o PRECI NCT 111 207 130 74 2 128 ~ 6 7 3 7 93 ~ 100 PRl:CINCT 112 433 261 15 1 9 l 272 5 129 10 7 l b2 11 tl5 PREC I NCT 113 285 173 104 3 l 173 3 96 6 11 125 l 14l.J TOTAL SUP LJ I ST 2 , " 0864 9141 132 3 1 6 ?45 l )512 !681 l 0 8 12 3 74 l ~ 26 1 ~19 7 526 477 . 5 TAT EME~ T Uf ALL VO TES tAST AT THI: GE~E:RA L El t LTI ON NUVLMUl:K ~ , 19 70 PAGt GUVt:RNUi{ LT. GO vtRNiJR 5 t( . UF STATE RlP DEM P/ F A/I RtP A/ 1 CEM P/F A/ I CEM P/ F KE:P T R u R 5 K H A H G tl F J u E N 0 H t E L A u R E T A R M E I M Q A (J 0 u A G u l.l A I'- p u u 0 E F L A H R E I l N I{ L N I: c s (J 0 v R K T t J u 0 E: R R T J N E R lJ y c A s T PRE ClNCT 114 257 183 69 l l 194 2 56 2 6 9.3 1 54 PRECINCT 115 410 320 134 4 321 2 80 2 6 119 3 266 PRl:C INCT 116 304 193 105 . l 180 l 112 l b 146 l 143 PREC IN CT 117 383 299 75 6 304 6 68 3 6 90 6 274 PREC IN CT 118 4 03 306 82 6 5 321 3 62 8 6 9o 10 277 PRE CINCT 119 289 182 103 l. l 186 l 9 1 6 9 110 10 15 1 PRE:C INCT 120 334 2 1~ lll. 3 220 3 105 3 4 140 4 181 PREC I NCT 1 21 213 131 7o l l. 138 2 bo 3 ~ 87 3 113 PKECINCT 122 1 57 1 04 51 l l 105 1 42 7 4 48 6 92 PRE:C I NCT 123 432 220 19 ': j '.: 230 12 170 15 11 ld9 22. 1S8 PREC I NCT 1 24 447 2 71 1':7 5 4 2&9 7 137 7 ti 198 4 l.33 PRE CINCT 125 3 82 2 19 151 6 l 220 3 131 16 11 172. 2 1 16 7 PRE CINCT l l.6 3 78 26" 1 0 7 2 275 90 b 4 136 8 l. L 2. PRE:C INCT 1 27 445 30i 130 1 2 324 4 99 8 11 170 2 251 PREC INCT 128 458 3 03 145 2 323 2 119 2 18 1 8~ 3 2 41 PR E:C INCT 1 2Y 4 8 1 361. 108 3 l 374 l 95 5 6 l tO 4 l.99 PRE.CINCT 130 3 74 2 !0 116 ii 3 2 '.: 7 4 9.J 7 6 1 9 '.: 201 PRE CINCT 1 3 1 414 271 134 ii 2 290 3 108 7 6 l b7 5 230 PRE CI NCT 132 372 2 11 153 3 2 22 l 3 13 1 8 I 177 () 173 PRECINCT 133 478 3 9 5 74 l 396 5 69 l 11 1 1': l 331 PRE CINCT 1 34 3 83 257 1 2 1 2 2 263 3 107 2 4 168 2 205 PRE CINCT 135 3 96 256 123 3 b 2 10 6 112 3 1 1~5 5 221 PRE:CINCT 136 351 26ii 78 4 l 269 2 69 4 ti 117 2 221 PRE CINCT 13 7 303 17 5 1 21 5 l 169 9 115 5 7 1 .39 4 145 PH. E:CINCT 138 529 34"i l 70 4 l 354 5 152 8 14 2 19 0 273 PRE:CI NCT 13Y 356 23C 120 2. 2 234 2 111 6 6 l 7ti 3 158 PRE CINCT 140 290 175 1 01 6 4 186 6 89 6 5 l ': 1 2. 129 PRECINCT 141 329 1 8 7 132 4 5 184 6 13 1 6 15 165 I 141 PRECINCT 142 4 05 231 160 4 4 247 8 141 .'.: 8 196 -L l S4 PRl ClNCT 143 322 175 143 2 179 138 l 2 166 3 146 PRE CI NCT 144 332 1 61 165 ~ l 168 4 146 6 ~ ! YO 5 1 24 PR EC. INCT 145 3 39 1 84 142. 8 l 196 l 126 11 ~ 179 d 142. PREC INCT 140 294 1 6E 114 4 4 178 3 107 4 3 138 l 146 PKECINCT 147 413 22 7 177 3 229 5 lo7 5 5 223 3 174 PRECI NCT 148 4 3 5 2 19 191 9 0 235 6 174 9 13 221 6 1 84 PREC INCT 149 3 5 8 23t 107 6 2 244 5 99 5 2 152 2. l S2 PH.E:C INCT 150 41 8 20~ 189 16 l 207 6 177 17 11 209 11 1 81 PRtCINCT 1 51 3 72 150 195 2 c 5 156 6 179 24 7 205 2 3 l Ll PRE CINCT 152 315 7C 2 10 26 4 85 6 180 38 8 192 41 70 PRECINCT 153 400 39 264 76 7 7 0 3 2 2 5 89 229 90 65 PR EC INCT 1 54 312 4 0 195 64 5 52 4 160 87 8 1 78 6 7 50 PRECINCT 1 55 246 20 175 46 1 28 3 145 68 4 149 60 26 PRE CINCT 156 331 46 2 20 52 3 70 6 184 60 5 200 54 oO PRECI NCT 1 57 3 76 60 2 3 6 6 9 1 68 7 193 99 '.: 200 8 7 68 PRE:C INCT 158 . 274 3 7 207 l.6 l 43 l 176 ?O 195 ;js 39 PREC INCT 1 59 41 9 2 30 17 8 6 l 236 2 160 14 0 187 ; 209 PK EC INCT 160 414 2 5" 1 51 l 5 L61 b 141 4 1 2 195 3 198 PRE CINCT 16 1 317 185 123 1 179 0 126 3 10 154 146 PRE CI NCT 162 459 241 200 9 3 242 10 194 10 10 L2o 6 205 . PRECINCT 163 3 13 178 1 24 2 b 186 8 110 6 ti 149 7 142 PREC INCT l o4 364 2 1~ 135 6 4 211 5 135 8 11 177 8 1 6L. PR EC.INCT 165 188 1 0~ 69 4 3 110 3 08 5 7 8 1 "l .J '10 PRECINCT 166 188 13 1 52 l 3 13 1 2 52 1 74 100 PRE CINCT 16 7 4 64 338 111 3 4 338 5 109 2 17 1 ~ 4 l 281 PRE CINCT l 6d 338 23.G 92 3 7 224 9 94 3 14 l l.7 4 l dO PRtCI NCT 169 3 33 2 50 76 l 3 2 4 2 5 69 3 10 89 3 2 17 PRE CINCT 170 3 74 2 30 132 2 2 230 2 130 2 6 159 1 9; PRECINCT 171 3 10 1 88 11 5 l 192 2 10 6 l j l 32 -~ 103 PRE CINCT 172 256 14~ 100 l l 138 2 99 l 4 l l.3 l 114 . TOTAL 5UP DI ST 3 " 1027 t7 94l l4S 2 4 5 79 7 :1300 l )078 l 12 105 ~66 l 124 72 7 126 4J3 703 - - STATEMENT OF All VOTt~ C:.AS f AT fHt GENE:RAL il~L fl ON NOVtMl3Ek 31 1970 1-'Abt 4 GOVERNOk L l . GOVERl~OR Stl Uf- 5TATt REP OE:M p / F A/ 1 KEP A/ I DI: M P/ F All (.;EM P/F RtP T R u R s K H A H u a f- J 0 E N 0 H E E L A (J k E T A R M E: 1 M (} A (J (J u A G u 0 A N p u G 0 w c. F L A H R E 1 l N R L N E: c s 0 L) v R K T E: J u 0 E R R T J N E R L) y c A s T PRCCINCT 173 280 187 85 178 4 85 l 7 130 134 PRECINCT 174 278 1 8~ 87 l 3 185 3 85 2 6 10 l 4 1 64 PRtCINCT 1 75 314 204 1 0 1 4 2U9 4 93 j 4 137 3 l oO PREC INCT 176 348 214 131 l 218 4 12 1 5 172 . 161 ~ PRECINCT 177 295 19E 92 2 204 2 8 8 13 lL4 155 - PREC INCT 17d 280 159 115 2 4 156 7 111 4 8 149 2 121 PRECINCT 179 325 20~ 110 l 1 21~ 3 98 4 12 132 3 172 PRECINCT 180 3 12 181 117 5 2 l bl 1 114 7 7 142 7 143 PREC INCT 1 ti 1 404 26~ 126 2 4 272 12 113 1 ld 1 ~2 4 226 PKECINCT 182 246 15~ 7 1:3 7 163 8 72 l 7 97 133 PRE:CINC.T 183 408 29( 111 l 5 2a4 6 110 4 8 162 ~ L~2 PRECINCT 184 263 15 ~ 98 '1 1 64 7 88 2 12 l 2ti l 119 PRECINCT 185 300 l 7t 117 .t; 171 2 118 l 4 !Sc: l 137 PREC INCT 186 2 78 191 83 1 3 192 2 82 2 6 126 4 140 PRECINCT l d 7 223 13~ 85 2 129 3 8 7 l 6 99 L- 113 PRECINCT 188 232 12 ~ 102 l l 120 4 103 l 4 l ,j2 3 87 PRECINCT 189 330 231 9 .t; '1 221 8 99 l 13 135 4 171 PREC INCT 190 195 8f 100 2 3 as 3 9 7 3 4 106 2 7d PREC INCT 191 241 141 9.t; 3 13 1 4 99 2 l 125 l 103 PRE:C.INCT 192 314 1 8; 119 2 2 190 5 113 5 12 138 4 155 PRECINCT 193 267 173 85 5 170 2 89 2 10 1 .2 7 2 12.2 PREC INCT 19 4 239 13 ; 102 l 3 124 5 104 3 8 135 2 92 PRECINCT 195 204 126 70 l J 129 4 o5 3 7 89 l 103 PREC I NCT 196 75 51 22. 50 3 19 1 4 3 1 l 3b PRECINCT 197 252 137 108 2 4 13d 5 104 3 9 138 4 l Gl PREC INCT 198 246 1 5!: 79 3 6 154 7 81 3 9 107 4 l l.4 PRECINCT 199 235 151 75 l 149 l 76 l 5 104 ll:J PREC INCT 200 425 331 93 326 2 93 3 l -'6 l 21d PRE:CINCT 201 358 255 9~ l l. 254 2 96 1 j 1 37 l 2 13 PRECINCT 202 290 2 12 75 l. l 211 2 73 10 110 l 166 PREC IN CT 203 212 13~ 69 3 2 138 1 64 4 l. 96 4 1 0~ P~E:CINCT 204 249 16~ 77 2 5 172 5 69 3 10 107 l 130 PREC INCT 205 123 7~ 43 1 74 48 l 64 l ~6 PREC I NCT 206 1 57 llf 35 2 116 .:S 3 3 l 49 3 ~o - - II TOTAL SUP DI ST 4 9 198 13070 74 131 72 +069 t64l 5900 53 p tl76 ~990 239 15 - STATEM E:NT UF ALL VOTES CAS l AT THc GE:~ E KAL E: LLC TION NOVlMBEK 3, 19 /0 PAuE: 5 GO VE:kNUK LT. GOVlRNUR !E C. OF ~ T A T E RlP DlM P/F A/ 1 Rl:P A/I Ll:M P/ F /:i i 1 CtM P/f RE:P T R u R s k H A H G B t- j 0 E: ~ 0 H E E L A c R E T A R M E I 11 Q A 0 0 u A G u 0 A N p lJ G 0 w I F L A H I{ E I L N K L N I: c 5 0 (j v K K T E J u 0 E R R T J N E R 0 y c A s T PREC INCT 207 388 25 1 131 3 2 248 2. l.:S3 2 9 1 82 5 179 PRE CINCT 208 270 1 9 1 72 2 196 l 70 6 90 170 PRECINCT 209 252 1 5 1 95 l 3 145 3 96 3 13 l L6 106 PRECINCT 2 10 27b 177 94 3 177 3 92 10 118 2. 139 PRECINCT 2 11 278 20C 77 200 3 74 l 8 105 1 162 PRECINCT 2 12 258 147 9 7 3 7 145 7 94 3 9 114 6 119 PRECINCT 2 13 2.76 19~ 73 3 192 4 71 l 7 8 7 L. 173 PRE:CINCT 2 14 4 64 33 ~ 116 l 4 3 45 l 108 l 10 163 2 82. PRlCI NCT 2 15 3 0 ~ 213 82 l 223 2 71 3 9 111 ~ 1 6 7 PRECINCT 2 16 3 1 5 1 9 ; 11~ 3 4 1 87 3 11 8 l 10 147 ~- 144 PRECINCT 2 17 2 4 5 1 61 75 l 2 l o4 6 6li l 9 90 2 136 P~ E CINCT 218 300 19 t 8 7 ~ ~ 197 2 9 1 3 2. l 110 5 152 PRECI NCT 219 264 l 7 t 83 1 173 l 85 l 11 94 3 147 PRECI NCT 220 3 7 8 2 7 ~ 93 "' 2 280 2 83 5 10 117 5 233 PREC INCT 221 3 66 29( 66 2 5 292 3 66 2. 0 103 2 247 PRECINCT 2L2 231 14 ~ 82 2 146 5 75 7 100 117 PRl:CINCT 223 277 l 8L 8~ 2. 1 180 6 86 11 103 149 PREC.I NCT 22. 4 296 2 5~ 39 l 2. 257 l 37 5 54 l 234 PR EC INCT 225 233 1 0 1 1 24 t 92 5 127 0 3 l t l 7 57 P.l{ECIN CT 226 245 1 3" 99 4 2 119 4 111 3 4 136 4 .s 0 PRECINCT 227 314 1 8C 130 l 2 171 4 136 l 10 173 l 125 PRECIN CT 228 342 1 4~ 1 84 6 l 142 3 182 l 8 2.15 3 103 PRE:C INCT 229 2 85 14~ 132 3 4 140 6 12 9 l 7 1 5 1 - 114 PREC INCT 230 244 l Cl 13 1 2 3 103 4 122 5 141 6 87 PRECINCT 231 2 52 1 0 ~ 136 2 1 106 5 130 4 0 1 57 6 73 PREClNCT 232 2 38 142 89 l 145 3 77 6 1 04 117 PRECINCT 233 284 1 2 1 153 ~ 2 12 1 5 151 2 5 173 5 c;5 PRECINCT 234 20 7 71 110 7 6 73 6 11 2 3 7 1 34 3 51 P R E C I~CT 2 3 5 258 143 110 2 135 6 108 2 11 1 37 1 105 PRE:CINC.T 236 258 12 .; 122 2 2 1 27 2 121 j 4 139 ~ 10 7 PRECI NCT 237 253 1 6 1 8t l 152 4 93 2 3 122 l 123 PRl:CI NCT 238 341 24" 88 6 243 10 84 2 7 1 ~ 2. l 204 PRECI NCT 239 334 2 1 ; 106 l 5 211 7 109 l l () l JO 4 178 PRECIN CT 2 40 198 l O: 85 l 1 9b l 9 4 l 10 7 3 81 PRECINCT 2 41 97 5~ jb 4 53 2 36 2 2 42 3 46 PRECINCT 2 42 25 2 145 100 2 2 141 4 100 4 19 125 3 S7 PRECI NCT 24 3 113 61 4 1 2 6 7 l 37 l 3 4,j l 57 PRt CI NCT 244 29 1 ; 9 l 20 d 1 10 1 16 PRECINCT 2 4 5 417 30t: 1 02 5 308 6 96 1 11 140 2 25 7 PRECINCT 246 2 19 149 65 3 l 148 l 65 3 3 98 l 1 10 PRECINCT 2 47 3 81 3 01 75 298 1 7 5 l 7 102 2 261 PR ECINCT 2 48 353 250 9 5 l ~ 241 4 104 l 7 124 08 PRECINCT 2 49 3 13 226 79 2 3 221 4 84 24 l 2d l 153 PRECINCT 250 3 18 22~ 89 22.0 4 87 2 b 113 l 190 PRECINCT 2 51 4 5 5 318 124 3 5 309 10 131 3 15 172 5 L52 PRECINCT 252. 418 285 12 7 l 2 281 5 124 2 14 171 l 224 PRECINCT 253 502 3 7 ~ 1 2.5 3 361 4 130 3 20 169 2. 301 PR EC INCT 254 2 53 1 82. 66 2 175 3 13 ( l Ud l .J4 PRl:Cl NCT 255 3 43 2 43 95 l l. 247 3 89 2. 6 109 L. 2 19 PRlCINCT 256 304 211 87 4 204 5 90 139 156 PRE CINCT 257 141 93 42 2 89 3 46 l 3 56 l 76 PRE CI NCT 258 64 2 1 40 20 42 4 4 5 15 PREC INCT 259 252 166 77 2 l 160 84 l 7 113 l l lL PREC.INCT 260 2 99 18c 99 l 5 176 9 102 l 11 1 24 3 1 51 PRtCINCT 26 1 323 22i 88 2 5 2.22 8 9 1 2 1 5 119 L- l t2 PRE:CINCT 262 255 1 5C 9 6 2 145 2 97 2 12 108 l 122 PRECINl.T 263 190 1 5~ 33 2 141 4 36 2 8 52 3 123 PRECINCT 264 326 201 115 l 3 198 3 120 8 149 16 1 PRECINCT 265 260 110 139 3 2 111 4 133 l 8 162 2 74 PRECINCT 266 287 1 3 i 13 7 2. 3 1 2. l 11 139 l 1 l b5 3 9 7 PRECINCT 267 7 8 47 24 2 2 45 3 2o 4 29 1 41 TOTAL SUP DI ST 5 l 6966 t5 o55 146 234 94 ' 231 ~ 6 1 3 l 0833 99 l 0645 '5 0 49 510 130 STATEMENT UF ALL VO TE:! CAST AT THI: uE:~cRA L ELECT ION NOVEMBER J , 197(; P Au E: 6 GO VERNUl{ LT. u OVE:RNOK ~I:(, . Of- STATI KEP Dl:M P / F A/I REP A/I Cl:M P/ F Al I t;l:M P/ f RtP T R u R s R H A h (, 8 F J 0 E N 0 H f: E L A 0 R I: T A R M E I M Q A L 0 u A G u 0 A N p J G u "' f: f L A H R E: I L N K L N I: c s u 0 v R K T E J u 0 E R R T J E R 0 y c A s T TOTAL SUP DIST 1 l 5223 5219 113 104 347 )207 7 933 9435 2 .3 4 9831 +5 72 318 3 19 - TOTAL SUP 015T 2 ~ 0864 9141 132 3 16 5 4 5 1 J5 12 d6~ 1 l 0812 374 l A. 2ol i31 97 526 477 - TOTAL SUP DI ST 3 ; 1027 7 941 141 24 5 7 97 ~300 l DL 18 l 121 0~ 56t: l 2472 7126 43 3 703 TOTAL SUP DIST 4 9 198 30 7~ 7 '1 131 72 i 069 +641 1590( 53 1' 8 76 2990 239 75 TOTAL SUP DIST 5 ; 696b 5 655 14 ~ 234 94 7 231 ~ 6 1 3 1 0 83~ 99 1 0645 56 49 5 10 130 SUB TOTALS j 3278 -- 1 032 6 1 ~ 1090 1 85 ~ _j 7 J l '1 -'.) IJ94c 4 19 08~ 1326 5 0085 2 ~ 53 4 202b 704 ABSENTEE TOTALS 3747 1170 2 '1 41 71 304 12 148 12438 36 2 5 10 1 045 92 71 GRANO TOTALS l 7 025 3 12202 638 113 1 1926 3 6623 4 ~ 09 4 5 1523 1362 5 2595 2 fJ57 9 ~ 11 8 L77 5 ,. . 7 7 5TATtMEN T OF All vo rES C.A5T AT THl: ul:NERAL ELLtTI ON NOVlMbER :S ' 1970 l'Aut 7 CON TROLL E:R TRlA 5UREt-. ATTY. uE:Nt:RAL O! ST. 4 BO . E:IJ REP P/ F DtM ktP P/ F OEM RlP P/ F OtM DtM R.tP A/ .1 T H w (. p H G y B L N J c 0 l: A R A 0 (J u B I A u T B M I M R u (, R v R 5 A F E E E p u r-. K I l v H L l R R s T 0 G L I: N l M 0 0 T 0 N E E N 5 5 A v u N N R y N 0 R T N E 0 y c A s T PRECINCT 001 297 204 3 7E 206 5 78 177 5 1 0 7 157 113 ~ PRECINCT 002 325 217 l 95 213 l 100 188 3 128 lt9 122 3 PRECINCT 003 292 150 3 11~ 156 l 117 120 3 l !., 175 85 6 - PRECINCT 004 3 71 249 7 9 5 254 l 100 223 l 133 l6g 15S 5 PRECINCT 005 257 128 10 1 05 120 2 117 1 07 6 134 156 o7 l L - PR ECINCT 006 3 34 13S 1 0 161 141 1 5 1 6 1 109 14 19 4 Ll7 68 1 2 PRtCINCT 007 254 20( 9 38 200 8 42 179 9 63 85 14 1 6 PREC INCT 008 336 23~ 5 81 221 7 94 200 8 l l.2 1 ~2 l o l 6 PKECINCT 009 256 1 9 J 5 44 198 3 4 9 170 8 1 l. 92 145 l. PRE:C.INCT 0 10 4 25 23i 2 7 136 239 28 1.38 203 39 l o3 198 1 6 1 14 PRE CI NCT 0 11 4 03 291 11 8~ 2 9'7 7 87 256 14 12 1 155 2 15 5 PRE CI NCT 0 12 386 261 l l: d4 274 14 85 236 26 112 134 206 '.1 PREC I NCT 0 13 296 22 1 5 SC 234 9 4 7 19 .:) 1 5 84 98 166 8 PRECINCT 0 14 272 20( 5 55 189 l 77 106 8 9 1 109 140 8 PRE CINCT 0 15 422 29l: 14 91 2&7 10 106 257 20 133 164 2 1 c; 9 PRE CINC.T Ol o 3 69 26( 12 83 L56 11 97 2.'. l 19 121 144 19 4 6 PR EC INCT 017 280 21 5 51 2 16 4 52 1 9 1 8 77 99 158 2 PRECINCT 0 18 385 293 8 6 7 305 8 65 254 14 103 140 205 7 PR ECINCT 0 19 463 2 8 4 8 102 291 38 1 04 229 43 1 61 198 185 16 PRECINCT 020 473 308 14 1 24 325 18 113 26 8 22 162 228 174 12 PR EC INCT 021 340 244 5 84 24 3 4 86 L05 6 119 J. 34 175 3 PRECINCT 022 311 194 2 3 ti4 204 l o ti3 177 23 104 164 11 8 0 PREC INCT 023 4 08 270 17 112 2 78 17 106 2 19 24 159 208 157 6 PR l:C INCT 024 406 258 17 116 2 7 0 17 111 22J 21 156 l.Oti 164 5 . PRECI NCT 025 72 59 2 9 60 l 9 46 l 22 24 Lt l 1 PR EC INCT 026 108 7c 6 2 1 79 5 21 6 7 7 l.9 34 64 5 PREC INCT 027 362 26 6 4 76 268 2 90 229 4 123 143 193 3 PRt:C INCT 028 357 25~ 10 7 5 264 8 79 2 16 10 118 159 1 6 1 5 PR EC I NCT OLJ 372 26( 5 86 272 7 82 236 9 11 5 144 180 y PREC INCT 030 3 10 1 9 1 6 96 207 6 8 7 165 12 l L6 139 l:S4 1 PKE: CINCT o_, l 388 241 12 11 7 254 7 116 2 10 12 1 54 186 l o 5 PREC INCT 032 438 31 ~ 9 9.ii 3 19 5 102 L1CJ 9 140 l bJ Llc 4 PRt:C.I NCT 033 41 8 2 7 ~ 22 105 L87 22 1 02 248 20 141 l b l l s. c 13 PRE: CINCT 034 386 2 5 1 10 1 U8 25 1 12 112 2 19 10 145 170 1 6 7 7 PRE:CI NCT 035 302 19C 7 9C l.02 4 8 0 156 6 126 15 1 111 5 PRECINCT 036 3 54 22L 7 103 232 7 105 196 14 l:Sl 17C l-t3 PREC INCT 037 393 2 6 t 3 99 282 2 92 24 5 4 1 3 1 146 2(,3 4 PR EC INCT 038 335 2 3 6 83 23 7 7 77 200 9 108 150 146 4 PRfCINCT 039 3 64 224 10 ll J 229 5 113 193 11 150 180 145 7 PR EC INCT 0 40 314 22L 5 73 221 8 79 178 6 122 133 149 3 PRECINCT 0 41 419 338 6 57 325 4 77 295 1 104 148 230 8 PRE:CINCT 0 42 212 14( 4 62 1 3 5 b 65 111 6 85 105 73 6 PRECINCT 0 43 360 2 81 11 4 .3 287 7 5o 250 13 88 10 4 225 3 PREC INCT 044 307 160 17 112 168 12 114 133 20 145 173 100 7 PRt:CINCT 0 45 291 217 4 55 22 7 5 50 196 6 8 1 116 148 4 - - TOTAL SUP DIST l l 5223 456 l p43 7 13929 555 S6~2 281 l 0265 li8 19 387 ~846 361 :i899 - , ~TA T EMENT OF All VO TlS CA~ T AT THE &E:NERAL tLE:C flON NOVtM c ER ; , 1970 PAGt 8 Cl.IN TROLLER T KE:A~URlR ATTY . ~ENE:HAL UIS T. 4 bO . E~ . REP P/ F OEM REP P/F lJEtJ RE:P P/ F OE:M Dt:M KEP A/ l T H w c p H y 8 0 N J c 0 t A R A 0 c u B E A u T B M [ M R u c R v R 5 A F E E t: p D r-. K l I v H L L R R s T 0 u L E N [ M 0 0 T (J t\ E E: N 5 s A v u N N R y 0 R T N E 0 y c A s T PRE:C I NCT 0 40 287 1 07 15 141 102 12 14 7 7 9 14 172 205 43 5 PREC INCT 047 298 120 14 143 118 10 150 100 10 175 189 70 10 PREC IN CT 0 48 207 107 13 SC 119 7 72 85 9 10 7 108 8C 10 . PRE CINCT 049 2 70 110 7 136 98 6 149 74 7 170 175 47 5 PREC INCT 050 286 1 0 1 11 164 96 8 168 70 6 194 198 44 13 PR EC INCT 05 1 l '.12 5. 14 102 53 11 102 4 3 13 l LO 120 30 5 PREC I NCT 052 343 1 3( 13 l 6f: 112 l~ 192 96 10 200 .2 10 b6 y PR E:C l NCT 053 320 1 6~ 17 122 172 13 127 135 17 155 l 6L 112 17 PREC INCT 054 267 8~ 13 14t d5 14 15 1 64 8 176 175 45 9 PRE:CINCT 055 178 51 12 96 5 1 16 88 42 13 l 0 !: 108 21 6 PREC INCT 056 2 15 1 0~ 11 d5 112 8 tj9 :I 0 9 107 107 73 4 PR EC. lNCT 057 357 1 9~ l .Ii 125 2 18 ll 115 158 12 l6Y lb6 126 8 PREC INCT 058 389 25~ l f 9f: 263 21 9 1 223 20 133 180 163 7 PRECINCT 059 307 l 8.o! 1 0 9 7 194 7 94 164 7 121 149 120 5 PRE:CINCT 060 275 14( 11 lo~ 156 0 104 119 20 130 152 9 7 6 PRE:CINCT Oo l 2 40 1 5.li 9 7 ( 155 5 73 140 7 65 90 111 7 PRE:CINCT 062 276 l7i 12 72 17 8 9 7 8 139 7 112 125 110 6 PRECINCT 063 35.li 1 9~ 1 8 12.l 194 lJ 136 164 2.6 159 178 134 7 PREC I NCT 064 297 1 5 1 l S 10 1 6 1 17 106 ll5 31 130 150 1C5 6 PREC I NC.T 065 226 140 6 6 143 3 74 1 2 1 4 91 S4 99 6 PREC IN CT 066 3 47 23~ 5 86 244 8 88 210 3 ll.3 157 155 4 PRECINCT 067 35Lj 20 23 1 0:i 222 17 102 176 2.2 144 16L l3b 1 5 PRlCINCT 068 364 281 l:. 65 283 3 71 256 ] 93 140 187 7 PRECINCT 069 277 l 9S 3 o2 195 5 62 173 2 9 l 91 141 2 PRECINCT 070 255 1 8~ 4 5 1 204 L 44 16 7 5 76 109 121 5 PRECINCT 071 325 23" 63 245 7 60 2 18 7 90 119 166 5 PREC I NCT 072 282 20( (: 56 200 2 63 163 3 96 106 12S 10 PRECINCT 0 73 338 22: 11 85 234 10 82 196 15 l l ti 133 165 6 PRECINCT 074 3l~ 214 7 8~ 221 5 91 198 10 lOtS 137 151 9 PRECINCT 075 241 1 2~ lC 9 .3 137 u 90 112 10 110 llo 86 5 PREC I NCT 076 257 14( f 9t 142 .S 103 122 7 12S 142. 86 6 PRECINCT 0 77 304 17 ~ 17 92. 182 16 90 lJ6 20 l Jl 145 12 'i PREC INCT 0 78 3 48 1 9~ 23 113 205 18 108 17 2 19 145 148 l4ti lL PRECINCT 079 30-J 172 17 103 177 11 102 139 15 137 166 105 4 PRECINCT 080 33 19 12 97 201 a 97 180 1 2 125 143 13l: 5 PRECINCT 081 274 l 7~ lC 7 Lj 188 1 70 159 17 84 108 1L9 0 Plt.CINCT 082 249 l OS 2 Lj 9 .; 119 16 1 0 1 94 2 1 124 l11 72 11 PRECINCT 083 221 8~ 20 9 1 94 10 103 75 14 121 128 55 8 PRECINCT 084 306 1 2 1 19 14( 123 2.J 132 106 2.2 1 ~5 168 8 1 10 PREC INCT 085 231 11 ! 14 92 114 9 100 93 2.1 109 120 74 11 PRECINCT 086 236 a~ 16 12. .2 82 17 123 64 20 14 ~ 140 52 11 PRECI NCT 087 .271 1 6~ 1 0 77 169 6 82 1!4 9 99 111 ll b 7 PREC INCT 088 289 11" 20 137 120 12 140 80 1 183 185 57 6 PRECINCT 089 258 132 11 10( 143 13 94 107 11 131 141 76 6 PRt.CI NCT 090 288 13( 17 12.( 138 9 123 10 7 18 143 1~4 at 10 PRECINCT 091 302 166 11 11.( 162 9 118 112 10 163 173 87 12. PRtt l NCT 092 349 l 6j 16 147 179 7 146 134 13 191 226 87 8 PKECINCT 093 284 l oC ~ 93 166 7 94 134 6 12.7 142 ; 8 7 PRE:CINCT 094 4 05 20i 17 15t 212 18 159 16 7 25 199 L_jc 111 le PRECINCT 095 477 33(: 122 345 8 115 299 15 1 ~4 212 228 7 - PRE:CINCT 096 367 23i l .; 96 2.39 11 106 185 14 157 177 lo2 5 PRECINCT 097 388 271 8 98 2~8 14 108 205 l L lol 183 106 12 PRE:CINCT 09d 284 1 6~ -i 96 176 4 ~'J 141 ij 12.7 160 J6 l - PREC I NC.T 099 29.li 172 9 104 164 6 114 l 3t 11 138 178 d2 1 PRt:CINCT 100 350 21(: 13 l OE 228 6 105 1 9 1 19 131 181 134 7 PRECINCT 101 350 231 16 87 239 7 97 2 10 10 12. ,j 1~8 loO 5 PRE:CINCT lOL 337 20.2 10 l Ot 19;, 10 115 16 1 4 lbO lb5 127 0 PRELINtT 103 3b6 24~ 7 10( 249 6 103 198 7 156 163 168 7 PRECINCT 104 304 1 8~ 4 104 180 3 109 144 b 144 174 88 lC PRECINCT 105 327 l 7.; 15 132 183 14 122 146 14 159 187 105 l C PREC INCT 106 304 l 9i 8 96 194 5 97 150 8 134 162 106 7 PREC INCT 10 7 323 2 1 2 1 5 8 7 206 11 100 171 15 1 31 180 10 7 10 PREC INCT 108 498 38~ 8 82 400 5 8 1 331 7 143 190 2.5 7 10 PRECINCT 109 399 30f 6 73 3 Ol:S 2 78 280 5 100 160 204 4 PRE:CINCT 110 355 183 20 137 198 14 133 142 2. 1 178 2. 12 93 10 PREC IN CT 111 207 13 4 7 54 143 3 56 120 4 75 ;2 93 5 PRECINCT 112 433 29"i 13 104 289 12 114 245 l d 158 19~ lb5 7 PRECINCT 113 285 l 8t 3 79 188 3 82 165 3 l Od 123 136 3 TOTAL SuP DI ST 2 . ~ 0864 8.20 l ?.2 75 7070 832 l )4d7 5 17 l 2002 6939 042 l J067 :} 139 702.C - STATtMENT OF ALL VuTES CAST AT THE Gt~tRAL l:LLC TIGN NOVEMdEK 3 , l97U PAut. CUN TRULLcR Ti{tASUKtR '"'lTY . GtNlKAL lJ l ~T . 4 tlU . t:IJ . KtP P IF Ot:M RlP P/F Dt_ Kt:P P/F LEM DtM KtP A/l T H w c p H (, y B G N J c 0 E A i{ A 0 c u B E A LJ T ~ M I M K u c R v K 5 A F f: E c p l) N K l 1 v H l L R R s T (J G L E N I M 0 0 T lJ N E: E: N s s A v u N N R y N 0 R T N E 0 y c A s T ~ PR EC I NCT 114 257 194 3 4t 205 4 44 177 2 7 5 94 139 3 PRECINCT 115 410 3 l t l 1.t. 328 3 74 295 107 116 2S6 4 PRECINCT 116 304 l7 t 4 95 202 l 90 153 3 139 143 122 L PREC INCT 117 383 30~ 8 54 3 19 5 54 2 75 9 92 118 236 4 PREC I NCT 118 403 32c 11 5 i. 326 ! 63 290 7 96 129 l41 4 PRE:CINCT 119 289 18E 10 7E 195 10 78 169 10 102 13 1 l 2b b PRECINCT 120 33~ 24~ 7 7! 233 3 86 206 9 110 144 153 7 PREC INCT 121 213 14 ~ 3 St 14~ 3 62 103 9 93 97 92 4 PRECINCT 122 157 111 9 3 1 122 8 L4 9 4 9 50 62 7 (, 4 PRE:C.INCT 123 432 2 4 3 .34 133 26 ( 28 117 214 40 162 201 165 16 PRECINCT 124 447 323 8 108 3 1 8 9 113 268 8 161 208 20C b PRl:C INCT 125 382 239 23 109 246 15 106 202 21 149 201 13C 6 PRECINCT 126 378 29t 10 62 286 8 78 25L 9 111 1 ~4 194 5 PRl:CINCT 127 445 333 9 8C 34~ 4 84 292 10 130 177 225 2 PRECINCT 128 458 341 7 95 S3 6 3 104 301 8 137 195 L!6 5 PKECINCT 1L9 481 3 7 3 1 7 i; .385 4 7'1 338 ti 125 185 .25 1 5 PRECINCT 130 374 .261 9 8t 264 10 90 224 13 125 154 180 7 PREC I NCT 1 3 1 414 30( 10 tl ' .3 05 7 95 208 0 131 170 L04 4 PRECINCT 132 3 72 232 11 11 .l30 5 128 186 l b 155 192 14.2 El PREC INCT 133 478 39.2 'i 62 411 l 58 349 116 . 109 334 3 PRECINCT 134 383 271 3 94 287 5 79 L42. 6 127 158 176 5 PRECINCT 135 396 29i 7 86 289 6 96 247 5 138 187 178 7 PRE:C INCT 136 351 212 4 6.3 281 3 o2 253 4 88 121 19S 3 PKEC INCT 137 303 18( 11 102 194 6 91 152 7 137 155 115 9 PREC INCT 138 529 36E 13 132 384 11 1L4 32. l 23 171 Ljf1 239 11 PREClt-4CT 139 356 235 8 l OC 264 4 83 206 1 134 183 142 9 PRECINCT 140 290 1 8~ 5 89 .200 6 80 146 8 134 166 q7 6 PREC I NCT 141 329 1 9.li ~ 123 200 4 117 159 8 157 177 116 l; PRECINCT 142 405 25i 6 133 263 8 125 2 13 5 178 L.u 7 167 9 P1,f:C INCT 143 322 19i 3 112 201 4 111 159 3 155 180 120 6 PREC INCT 144 332 19 1 6 1 21 198 3 120 155 7 153 186 102 l L PRECINCT 145 339 20E a 111 209 9 110 167 9 154 187 122 7 PR EC INCT 146 294 181 8 99 180 5 106 160 7 119 145 1 21 (; PR ECINCT 147 413 25f 11 133 24d 6 144 204 13 185 204 159 12 PRECINCT 148 435 26~ 15 14 ~ 2.06 11 151 228 8 189 234 160 12 PRECINCT 149 358 25~ 5 82 254 5 91 207 7 128 J.57 164 8 PRECINCT 150 418 2.l.: 23 145 2.46 15 148 183 21 203 226 139 16 PRECINCT 151 372 1 8~ 33 141 192 .26 143 129 36 188 2LL 9C 16 PRECINCT 152 3 15 11 ~ bC l.2G 115 58 125 84 7 .3 153 l ':, d 7C 11 PRt:CINCT 1 53 400 117 110 1 51 98 112 166 51 139 196 274 41 24 PRECINCT 1 54 3 12 8C 104 112 76 95 12.4 44 12.L 13 4 204 35 20 PRECINCT 155 246 5! 80 99 48 75 114 27 92 124 179 17 11 PRECINCT 156 331 8~ 95 127 89 75 141 52 102 165 225 32 25 PRECINCT 1 57 3 76 l OS 12i 12C 104 123 135 65 143 157 243 46 L.2 PRECINCT 158 274 94 57 112 11 48 135 47 9o 127 194 35 8 PRECINCT 159 419 261 13 1 32. 279 14 119 L28 2o 152 2.13 168 11 PRECINCT 160 414 283 7 11~ 301 2 103 249 6 153 .2 l U 165 10 PRECINCT l b l 3 17 193 2 107 195 114 170 4 138 153 132 6 PRECINCT 16.l 459 26 2 1 14t: Lbb 19 16 219 22 206 .c:'.40 16. l~ PRECINCT 163 3 13 19~ 13 91 198 10 102 174 12 120 16 l 126 ~ PREC INCT 164 364 2.L.7 lL 111 .l40 ll 108 190 13 l~O l9b 138 ll PR EC INCT 165 188 114 7 59 125 3 53 104 7 74 83 86 8 PRECINCT l b6 188 128 l 47 132 l 48 109 1 70 b4 b7 L PRl:CINCT 167 464 350 l C 90 344 4 97 304 8 137 174 246 8 PREC INCT 160 338 234 3 91 239 1 83 l "3 5 5 130 142 166 12 PRE:C INCT 169 333 238 5 66 L50 5 62 223 4 86 lll 173 12 PRECINCT 170 3 74 2 4~ 3 109 2.45 3 109 2.l l l l3b 17L 15C 5 PRECINCT 171 310 1 9.ti 3 9o 205 3 85 171 3 125 136 131 7 PREC INCT 172 256 155 2 81 154 2 79 130 L 107 lL2 96 2 fOTAL SUP DI ST 3 - 1027 llCl l l3602 )872 1262 l )030 5 11 l t3321 ': 17b 943 1 ~ L50 ~44 )59~ ~TATtMENT uF All VOT!:~ CAST AT THE ~E l:RAL E l tC Tiu ~ NOV E Mbl~ 3 , 197u PAGt 10 CuNTKOLL!:R TRt.ASl.JRl:K. ATTY. GE:N l:RAL u l .'.T. 4 BO . ti.al . REP P /f D!:M KtP P/f DtM RE:P P/F D l: 1-1 1.JtM REP A/ I T H w c p H G y B (; 1\1 J (, 0 E: A R A c L u L t: A u T B M I M R u c R v K. s A F E: E E p u f' K l l v H l L R K s T G G l E r~ I M 0 0 T 0 N I: E: N .'. s A v u N "" R y N 0 R T N E 0 y c A s T PREC INCT 173 280 1 6 7 7 85 166 4 90 146 4 111 128 113 6 PREC INCT 174 27 8 196 3 72 1 94 2 78 166 4 100 12.2 1L6 tl PRECINCT 175 314 207 2. 91 204 5 95 157 3 145 163 11 a 4 PRECINCT 176 348 201 5 130 ll7 1 119 170 2 169 187 125 10 PRl: CINCT 177 295 189 1 96 202 88 158 3 131 14S llC 6 PRl:CINCT 178 280 160 3 11 ( 156 3 113 118 3 1 5 1 164 8 7 4 PRECINCT 179 325 201 2 107 200 4 l Ob 158 6 144 1 51 133 10 PREC INCT 180 312 184 10 105 183 7 106 l4b 10 144 160 116 3 PREC INCT 1 8 1 4 04 28:. 4 106 200 2. 124 216 ! l.68 184 181 11 PRE:C INCT 182 246 158 4 73 165 74 12j l 116 122 9'1 1 0 PRtCINCT 183 408 21:. 4 11 2.79 3 116 22 t:s 7 165 l 8"t 19 4 l l PRECI NCT 184 263 14E l l Ot 157 3 100 130 3 128 1 31 97 l C PRECINCT l t:i5 300 15 ~ 3 131 171 3 120 1 3 7 5 151 16 7 111 4 PREC INC.T 18b 2 78 1 8~ 2 89 1 94 2 80 150 7 izo 142 114 6 PRECINCT l U7 2 .:'.3 12 1 l 9( 135 3 11 112 3 103 114 88 7 PREC I NCT 188 232 107 6 105 1 07 4 106 89 3 12.S 1 2.7 7 5 3 PREC INCT 189 330 21( 3 1 07 2 13 l lll 170 5 148 147 156 11 PREC I NCT 190 195 85 3 96 90 2 92 71 7 107 111 ': 7 3 PREC INCT 19 1 241 1 2~ 6 ~! 129 3 98 9.3 12 ll5 l L9 8 1 1 PRE:C INCT 192 314 202 7 1 01 200 5 105 136 9 165 l b l 124 9 PREC.INCT l J 3 267 15 ~ 2 100 170 4 ~($ 134 6 l LO 144 89 7 PREC INCT 194 239 130 3 96 1 2 1 l 110 100 4 132 125 86 9 PRECINCT 195 204 121 1 76 124 l 75 93 4 102 87 9 1 8 PREC INCT 196 75 47 l 25 47 l 24 36 2 37 39 27 3 PREC INCT 19 7 252 12t 4 l l ; lJO 2 115 97 5 142 144 BS l C PRl:CINCT 198 2 46 15Li 4 84 1 !:4 2 82 126 4 112. 129 85 15 PREC INCT 199 235 144 2 72 143 l 7 8 116 3 102 114 as 3 PRECINCT 200 425 325 3 BC J36 2 tlO 276 2 139 143 z4c; 5 PRtCINCT 201 358 24t l 97 2.63 2 90 1 ~9 b 14; 148 176 t;; PRECINCT 202 290 1 9:. 1 86 218 2 6 7 149 3 l JO 142 13C 6 PREC INCT 203 2 12 12 .i: 5 77 134 ~ 70 99 2 105 113 83 4 PRECINCT 204 2 49 166 2 7 E 1 72 1 74 l 3b 4 106 120 105 9 PRE:C INCT 205 123 69 l 41 d2 2 38 64 5 .53 oJ 45 i PRECINCT 206 157 11 Li 3 33 11 ': 3 36 96 d 49 50 92 l . TOTAL SUP DIST 4 9 198 110 :5837 l3025 161 +5lu l32 56 7 ~ 3083 86 t595 ~1 )4 13741 STAT EMENT OF ALL VO T E:~ ~A5 T AT THE GE~ERA L ELE:CTlON NU V E:M~Ek 3 , l 9 7 u PAGE 11 ClJN TRULLE:R TKE:ASURt:R ATTY. Gt:Nt kAL [J l ST. 4 B 0 . El.I ~ f: P P/F OE:M KE:P P/F LEM RE:P P/f LLM OLM tEP A/l . T H w c p h G y B L N J c 0 E A R A L c u 6 .t : A I; T t3 M I M R u c K v R s A F E: t E: p 0 ~ K l I v H L L R R s T 0 G L E N l M u lJ T c t\ E: E N s s A v u N t'4 R y N 0 R T N E 0 y c A s T PRE:ClNCT 2 07 3 88 212 5 151 217 6 147 2 06 9 1 61 216 1 34 7 PRECINCT 208 270 18i 7 ~ 1 8 3 80 loO 1 99 114 1 35 PRE:CINCT 209 252 14l: 2 91 148 1 95 131 4 110 1L5 l OC 9 PRECINCT 2 1 0 276 17 ~ . 82 174 2 8 4 157 110 146 106 5 PRECINCT 2 11 278 1 88 5 81 199 3 73 172 5 97 136 1 2 5 6 PRECINCT 2 1 2 2 5 8 142 7 91 150 5 93 13.:3 5 107 115 10 6 9 PRECINCT 213 276 19 ~ 4 65 1 9 1 4 77 176 8 85 110 131 7 PRECINCT 2 14 464 32~ 2 116 338 l 110 293 3 15 4 18 7 242 _", PRECINCT 2 15 3 0 Lj 20b 3 7 t 207 3 77 19 1 ;, J4 120 147 7 PRECINCT 2 1 6 315 l 7( 2 118 177 5 111 165 1 122 140 132 6 PRE:CINCT 217 245 155 2. 6 S 1 54 3 80 142 l 93 10 7 11 ( 3 PRECINCT 2 18 300 1 8~ 4; d l 20~ l 79 169 2 117 1 36 131 t PRECINCT 2 19 2 6" 1 6~ 4; 7~ l o9 2 78 149 4 100 111 12 2 7 PRECINCT 220 3 78 264 13 8~ 2 74 7 85 242 8 l OCJ 1 3; 190 l C PRECINCT 221 360 27~ ~ o2 292 3 64 253 2 97 134 l CJO 5 PRE:CINCT 2.22 2 3 1 12 3 92 145 2 75 132 3 9 1 119 8 ; 2 PRECINCT 2 2 3 277 17t 3 8 .I! 188 2 81 164 6 9ts Y7 150 4 PRECINCT 2 24 2 96 25l 4 2 ~ 259 2 30 230 2 58 73 1 93 2 PRt:CINCT 225 233 7 ~ 8 1 3 ! 82 5 138 7 2 6 149 l ~ ~ 53 5 PRE:CINCT 2. 26 245 1 0 ! t. 11 ~ 110 5 116 98 I 122 13 7 8 1 3 PRE:C.INCT 227 314 171 8 12 8 1 83 4 119 140 7 160 174 110 7 PRECINCT 228 342 14t 5 173 154 2 170 124 9 188 218 91 4 PRECINCT 229 2 8 5 1 3 ~ 5 133 139 6 1 27 112 10 152 l .!: 7 9 8 3 PRECINCT 230 244 105 4 120 l OL 5 123 90 7 135 144 73 3 PR ECINCT 231 252 9 : 8 1 35 97 3 1 33 9 0 5 140 1 5 7 63 .:) P~t:CINCT 232 L38 1 3~ 2 84 13 2 2 94 114 3 109 14 86 6 P ~ EClNCT 2 3 3 284 llC (: 156 120 8 140 9 5 8 168 170 7S 6 PRE:CINCT 234 2 07 71 6 111 73 10 109 5! 6 131 13 5 41 7 PREC.INCT 2 3 5 258 1 2 ~ : 111 133 3 116 97 7 145 1 35 89 L PRE(.iNCT 2 36 2 58 1 2~ 7 113 1 3 5 b 1 07 118 5 130 148 92 4 PRE:CINCT 237 2 53 13E 3 1 O.l!i 145 4 99 12 2 5 121 . 125 1 0 4 7 P~EClNCT 238 341 22i 3 9E 2 32 l 94 2. 17 5 113 147 16 S 7 PREC INCT 239 3 34 20t I. 112 2 16 3 10 2 200 3 1 22 1 ~ 4 1 3ts 17 PRECINCT 2 4 0 198 ;~ -i; 8 102 3 83 8 6 4 9 7 10 4 7 f; 3 PRECINCT 241 97 5~ 2 3i 5 4 4 35 48 3 39 43 4 2 l PRECINCT 2 4 2 252 12t - 1 0~ 120 2 l OH 11 8 5 1 20 142 d 5 P ~E CINCT 2 43 113 61 l 3 S 6 1 2 35 5 6 4 39 47 44 2 PRECINCT 244 29 li 1 t 1 8 10 18 1 9 l .:i 10 PRECINCT 2 4~ 417 27E 3 115 296 l 1 07 2.75 4 12 4 156 2 1 ; l C PRtCINCT 2 46 219 13 ~ 1 76 142 3 67 115 5 9 1 108 91 3 PRECINCT 2 47 3 8 1 27i 3 86 2 90 2 79 248 5 115 135 2 13 8 PRE:CINCT 2 4 8 3 53 232 3 9l 23 7 1 100 198 2 136 155 16 2 0 PRECINCT 2 49 313 2 0~ 2 93 206 3 95 179 3 12 1 141 142 15 PRECINCT 250 318 2 10 2 9 0 22 9 3 76 19 6 6 10 4 1 3 7 1 53 5 P~E:CINCT 25 1 455 2 8 1 7 146 3 04 ~ 135 264 7 117 14 203 11 PRE CI NCT 252 418 261 3 143 2 79 3 125 247 6 156 1 97 1 8 4 15 PRECINCT 253 502 34' 3 132 3 73 5 110 345 4 144 185 2d l 12 PRECINCT 254 253 16 " l 82 169 1 79 152 2 97 120 115 0 PRECIN CT 255 343 24 ~ 5 83 2 5 0 6 79 220 :;$ 114 114 19 7 b PRECINCT 256 30 ~ 1 9~ 2 1 0 2 200 l 96 185 3 111 146 138 2 PRECINCT 2 57 141 8 t 43 9 1 l 45 76 ~ 8 5 4 6 1 2 PRLCINCT 258 6Lj 17 2 43 22 1 37 13 2 44 45 13 l PRECINCT 259 252 141 ~ 83 153 2 b l 12 2 4 112 llC 103 6 PRtCINCT 260 299 16; 5 105 180 3 102 1S4 5 120 13 1 129 8 PRECINCT 261 323 19E 4 111 224 2 93 1 8 6 3 126 139 1 5 1 1 6 PRECINCT 262 2 55 13; ~ 93 145 2. 91 123 ~ 107 1L6 9 7 4 PRECINCT 2o3 190 1 3 ~ 5 4 ( 1 3 ~ 2 35 122 3 ~4 67 ;6 4 PRE:CINCT 264 326 18 ~ 3 113 188 3 118 171 4 141 l ~O 1 3 C, a PRECINCT 265 260 ; l 5 141 9 3 1 136 89 6 143 l ~O 69 7 PRE:CINCT 266 287 111 7 14C 122 9 140 99 8 loO 166 8 1 7 PRECINCT 267 78 44 28 45 l 28 41 j 29 3 1 35 4 . TOTAL 5UP DI ST 5 l 69b6 236 l P4o5 p o37 2. 7d 791!.8 3o5 l U0 4 tl 15835 202 )155 lb75 7226 - STATE~IENT O~ ALL VUTES CAS T Af IH E: bt~ERAL E:LtCT ION NUVE:M8tK 3 , 197C PAGE lL CON TRCJL LER TRE:ASURl:i ATTY . GE:N EKAL UI ST. 4 dD . l:Q . REP P/F OEM KEP P/ F DEM REP P/f- ul.M OEM kEP A/ I T H w (. p H G y B 0 N J c 0 E A R A 0 u u lj E: A u T B M I M K u (. R v K s A F c E E p 0 N K l I v H L L R R s T G G l t N l M 0 0 T 0 N t E N s ~ A v u N r R y N 0 R T N E 0 y c A s T TOTAL SUP DIST l ] 5223 456 1 0437 13929 555 :692 281 1 D265 3819 387 ~846 536 1 6ti99 TOTAL SUP DI ST 2 ~ 0864 82C 1 ?.27S 7070 832 l ) 4 87 517 1 2002 b939 642 l )067 ~139 7620 - TOTAL SUP DIST 3 1027 1101 1 3602 t)872 1262 1 )030 511 1 l3321 '5 778 943 1 l L~O 7944 d!:S2 TOTAL SUP DI ST 4 9198 llC ~ 83 7 13025 161 't 5 10 23L 5o7S 13083 86 ~595 tl94 3741 TOTAL 5UP DI ST 5 J 6966 23~ 1 0 4 6~ b o37 2 78 .,.,28 365 l 0048 '5 835 202 ~1 55 )875 7226 SUB TOTALS I 327~ 2723 ~ 12616 2 15533 l3088 3 9647 6-906 5 1 3 1 ~ 2 5454 ?.260 4 B913 3 3513 3 't 0 78 ABSENTEE TOTALS 3747 134 12606 909 135 l4L2 74 12516 910 93 gL2o ~ 2 44 1907 GRANO TOT Al S I 7025 ~ 857 5 5222 2 6442 3223 4 l06S LS80 5 3a31 2 6364 ~35 3 4 Jl39 3 t 157 3 5985 . ~ T ATEMENT OF ALL VOT E ~ CAST AT THE GEN EKAL LlCT10N NUVEM8ER 3 , 1970 PAGc 13 uS 5t:NA TOR us RLP . l) i 5T. l_, ST. 5EN . u l 5 T.24 ST.ASM . Ol ST .:36 RlP DEM A/l P/ f Rt:P OEt-1 A/ l KtP A/I LtM KEP OEM T M T R 5 T H J L c h M p u u u l c E: A 0 A c t A A T R N p H A R R G l K c L A p L E G T 0 u l I{ G M L H l: l: E u E 1"1 l 0 l E y y y R l: T A t\ N L K v R s L 0 s l T l v . E N R 0 A c y A s T PRl:C I NCT 001 297 1 47 145 2 l 164 130 l 2 15 l 75 141 147 PREC I NCT 002 325 14: 175 1 186 137 241 4 72 1 57 16 1 PREC I NCT 003 292 9t 180 '1 2 126 159 167 l 1 18 llC 172 PREC l NCT 004 371 19( 171 225 138 2 262 3 97 2 1 6 137 PREC INCT oos 257 9 ; 147 2 l 102 145 4 141 7 93 95 142 PREC IN1T 006 334 96 225 4 l 12 7 190 5 166 10 132 1 08 20C P~EC I NC T 007 254 l t l 87 t: 182 70 196 4 46 l t l 86 PREC I NCT 008 330 17( 1 54 2 1 199 134 247 2 17 1 76 148 PREC INCT 009 256 1 5.L 9t: 4 172 79 l 198 l 45 143 103 Pkl:C I NCT 0 10 425 l 7 ~ 229 3 1 5 2 16 200 3 245 12 144 l tl 1 206 PREC INCT 0 11 403 22"i 171 2 261 140 l 2.92 s 97 2 13 179 PRt:C I NCT 0 12 3tl6 l j i 17.L ~ j 24~ 138 l 200 3 97 199 165 PREC I NCT 0 13 296 18 ~ 105 '1 201 84 2 2 18 6 60 l b3 96 PREC I NC.T 0 14 212 1 41 12 1 ~ ~ 176 88 5 189 l 15 14L 1 19 PREC I NCT 0 15 422 2 l l 1 87 3 9 248 l b 7 1 287 't 117 203 199 PREC INCT 0 16 369 1 8~ l 71 2 j 232 13 4 1 25 1 4 100 185 166 PRlC l NCT 0 17 280 1 7( 102 ~ 2 205 72 1 2 1 4 S6 l b6 10 4 PREC I NCT 0 18 385 2 11 1 6 7 1 l 248 133 l 289 1 82 207 164 PREC. lf'iCT 0 19 463 19 1 238 7 l ~ 218 2.36 3 279 11 151 196 2.56 PREC I NCT 020 473 20~ 24 5 3 6 253 2 12 1 3 11 11 133 206 25S PREC I NCT 021 3 40 1 8~ 146 2 3 220 114 3 2 4 0 5 89 175 154 PRE CI NCT 0.22 311 1 3~ 165 l 6 164 146 l 196 l 105 144 154 PRlC I NCT 023 408 16( 234 3 7 .lll 192 2 239 5 153 159 2 40 PREC. If\lCT 024 4 06 189 205 2 6 221 176 4 254 2 14 1 180 Ll6 PREC I NCT 025 12 4~ 25 l l 50 22 6 1 l 10 39 33 PREC INCT 026 108 64 41 2 7 1 37 79 4 24 63 41 PHEC I NC.T 027 362 2 1 ( 142 4 2 4 8 108 5 267 85 20C 149 PREC I NCT 028 357 l7E 1 67 l 5 223 130 258 3 91 16 4 188 PREC INCT 029 3 72 20~ 1 53 6 l 229 135 3 262 ~ 78 185 173 PR1C I NCT 030 3 10 14'1 153 4 2 172 13 1 198 l 93 145 153 PREC INCT O_j l 388 1 8~ 199 3 2 202 l b3 l 2 51 3 122. 177 199 PR1C I NCT 032 438 2 46 1 8~ 2 2. 2 74 159 2 308 3 llJ 232 193 PREC I NCT 033 418 2 1E 1 84 3 c; 254 155 b 281 8 1 1 1 204 19 7 PRt:C. 1NC.T 034 386 1 86 189 2 5 236 147 2.58 3 114 194 183 PKcC. INCT 035 302 l 34! l oO 2 177 116 3 19 l 4 94 139 149 PRt:C INCT 036 354 17"l 16 7 2 2 2 14 132 1 224 114 16 7 176 PRt:C l NCT 037 393 2 1 ~ 167 1 l 251 135 280 L 97 Ll 6 15 8 PRE: C.INC.T 038 335 177 1 5 1 2 2. 2.2.2 109 2 43 2 77 168 156 PRf:C INCT 039 364 15E 195 3 192 16 7 l 250 2 100 1 5 1 197 PREC INCT 040 314 1 5: 156 2 l 192 119 220 3 85 159 143 PREC I NCT 041 419 26E 141 2 3 286 125 326 l 86 271 135 PRE CI NCT 0 4 2 2 12 8~ 119 2 2 118 90 1 141 4 58 90 106 PREC I NCT 0 43 360 234 111 3 - 264 92. 271 3 12 2 16 1 2 1 PRl: CI NCT 044 307 11 ~ 184 1 4 142. 160 l 16 4 11 115 122 16 7 PREC INCT 0 4 5 29 1 172 1 11 2 2 197 86 2 220 3 53 158 125 . . TOT Al SUP DIST l l 5223 7139 164 15952 1 )362 +14 7 71 1 7 7592 93 ~02. l o9 174 7512 ~ T A T EMtNT OF ALL vurt5 LAST AT THI: GENtRAL t LtCTIGN NU V EM~l:K 3 , 1970 PAGE:. 14 U 5 SE 1'1A TOk U5 KEP . OI ST.13 !:T.S tN . U1 ST. L4 ! T. A~M . D I ST . 36 REP OEM A/I P/ t- RtP OEM A/ I REP A/ 1 Cl:M Ri:P DE:M T ,., T R 5 T H J l L t- M p 0 u u I c E: A 0 A u t A A T R N p H A R R G L R c L A p N L E G T 0 (J l K G H L H E E: E lJ E: M I 0 I I: y y y R E T A f\ ~ L K v R s L 0 5 1 T l v E N R 0 A c y A s T PRf:Cl NCT 0 46 287 43 22 1 -: 6 79 193 4 1 0 4 b 149 66 206 PRE CINCT 047 298 6 ; 212 i; 4 106 184 l 130 8 138 9 1 185 ~ PRECINCT 0 48 207 1:. 122 ; 7 89 112 2 10 1 9 89 83 117 PR ECINCT 0 49 270 61 197 3 87 173 3 106 b 136 73 174 PR ECINCT 0 50 286 5 5 220 2. 2 74 200 5 111 4 160 65 198 PRE CINCT 051 192 3:. 14( 3 2 46 132 I 64 7 89 4 2 130 PRECINt,T 052 343 7 ~ 2 4 ( 5 1 99 220 141 2 171 84 22.8 PRECI1'4CT 053 320 112 190 7 4 139 170 8 182 10 115 l C7 LOl PRECINC.T 054 267 5i l 9 .ii 1 5 75 ltS5 2 102 4 138 55 l ti 8 PRECINCT 055 178 3 ~ 127 E 52 116 62 2 90 40 112 PRECINCT 056 215 8~ 128 2 l 102 106 2 10 7 6 88 82 116 PRE CINCT 057 357 12t 217 ~ i; 188 l oO 3 2 19 1 11! 143 1 9~ PREC I "'CT 058 389 19( 187 l l 234 150 l 2 51 3 112 18 7 183 PREC I NCT 059 307 13 .r! 156 :. 2 171 128 3 190 7 95 136 156 PRECINCT 060 2 75 10 .r! 159 3 5 1:)3 1 36 3 144 9 110 108 155 PR EC INCT 061 240 12 .( 112 l 155 78 153 4 75 1L4 102 PRECINCT 062 276 127 132 ~ 3 170 96 174 2 77 123 126 PRECINCT 063 3 5.li 15( 1 86 l 9 173 1 69 5 206 6 130 148 188 PRECINCT Oo4 297 l o; 177 4 8 127 163 4 145 l. 13 1 108 175 PRECINCT 065 226 l Ol 109 l. 2. 131 90 143 3 7 2. 109 105 PRECINCT 066 347 1 8; 148 l 3 215 1L4 231 2 94 180 144 PRECINCT 067 3 54 l b2 176 4 6 189 158 4 208 6 119 152 179 PRECINCT 068 3 64 230 124 2 266 90 27 5 3 78 2.32 116 PREC I NC.T Oo9 277 l 53 1C9 3 l 169 100 2 194 5 66 139 12C PRECINCT 0 70 2 55 152 9 o 1 l u2 69 l 197 3 47 142 100 PRl:CINCT 0 71 325 1 8~ 130 5 2 2 13 102 3 235 5 b6 18; 117 PRf:C:.I NCT 0 1 2. 282 150 12 1 1 l 182 90 4 190 10 00 13 1 13C PRECINCT 0 73 3 38 172 148 4 2 217 l. l 5 235 l 92. 176 148 PRECINCT 074 32 .ii 17L 140 l 3 206 109 2 L29 6 /8 182 12. 8 PRl:LINCT 0 75 241 8 " 148 5 112 127 12.B 4 101 8C 1,0 PRECINCT 076 257 9t 153 4 2 126 125 4 15 4 4 91 9 ; 143 PKf:CINCT 077 304 123 169 2 4 161 136 1 176 2 103 1L4 156 PREC IN CT 0 78 3 48 161 172 4 7 179 160 4 20! 6 121 147 176 PRECINC.T 0 79 309 11 ~ 177 5 6 147 151 3 174 ., 112. 102 i 9L PRECINCT 080 338 l o l 156 1 5 1 9 ~ 127 209 6 96 1 5~ 145 PRECl NCT 081 2 74 161 105 l 2 175 90 1 182 b 7 2. 149 109 PRE CINCT 082 2 49 1t 149 3 13 105 131 5 121 8 100 87 142. PRl:CINCT 083 221 6 t:. 139 4 6 83 126 3 102 12 92 72 133 PKECINCT 084 306 85 19 7 8 5 122 164 5 128 12 12.8 95 174 PRt CINCT 085 237 90 134 3 5 99 134 2 11! 3 102 92 12.o PRE.CI NCT 086 236 43 176 3 9 66 163 2 95 8 115 6 5 151 PRECINCT 087 271 122 l l.8 3 5 161 100 l 105 5 79 132 120 PREC INCT 088 289 63 214 2 3 110 173 1 117 5 148 b l 189 PRl:CINCT 089 258 82 166 3 3 112 138 1 127 6 108 92 15C PRECINCT 090 288 8L 188 l 7 112 166 4 140 10 122. 9; 173 PRE CINCT 091 302 103 187 3 3 139 l !l 3 184 8 98 115 169 PREC.IN CT 092 349 115 222 l 4 144 19 7 l 163 4 163 12C 2 12 PREC INCT 093 284 11 '3 155 3 l4b 12.6 3 169 5 95 115 15C PKEC I NCT 094 405 14C 248 l 8 164 231 3 20'} 5 175 143 244 PREC INCT 095 477 251 213 2. 3 260 209 2 335 1 135 229 241 PRE CINCT 096 3 67 16l 1 91 2 3 176 181 2 2. 17 6 131 154 194 PRl:C INCT 097 388 174 19S 3 8 222 161 3 2 46 5 124 196 181 PRECINCT 098 284 11 ~ 159 7 1 114 162 174 3 92 125 147 PKECINCT 099 294 102 185 l 2. 12 1 170 1 162 ! 114 9 4 188 PREC I NCT 100 350 15t 177 4 5 182 162 2 . 2 12 6 125 141 191 PRl:CINCT 101 350 161 178 5 200 145 3 2.44 6 Hb l o 7 108 PRECINCT 102 337 1 2; 199 2 3 156 176 2. 192 4 12! 117 205 PRE CINCT 103 366 l 7 182 214 142 3 248 4 107 184 175 PREC INCT 104 304 121 172 2. 2 143 155 18 4 4 101 120 162 PRE:ClNCT 105 327 12 1 192 3 5 144 179 1 175 9 12.9 117 194 Pf{ECINCT 106 3 04 1 2~ 170 4 l 160 138 3 19 1 2 102 127 173 PRECINCT 107 323 131 1 86 1 3 164 152 2 197 3 l 13 140 .l 7 L PRE CINCT 108 498 305 183 2. 3 46 146 l 3 86 4 93 28 7 186 PRECINCT 109 3 99 230 159 5 2 255 140 1 312 4 75 208 183 PREC INCT 110 355 115 22 1 2 7 147 199 2 176 8 160 105 239 PRE CINCT 111 207 95 103 2 2 120 8 1 2 151 l 53 87 116 PREC INCT 112 4 33 202 207 4 8 232 184 6 282 4 12.6 196 2 1 1 PREC INC.T 113 285 148 131 3 l 171 111 l 201 2 71 14S 1 2. 5 TOTAL SUP OI ST 2 2 0864 l 1414 261 9 827 J. ~183 7L69 l 10d7 8536 182 l 0456 146 35~ ~608 ~TATEMENT OF ALL VOit~ CAST AT fH E GENERAL LLcCT IL ~ NUV(M ~ tk 3 , 1970 PAC,t 15 US 5f:NA TUR US KlP . uiST. l~ 5T .5E"4 . UI5T. L4 ST . ASM . Dl ST.36 Rt:P OLM A/I P/F RE: P DE I" A/ I REP /J/l LtM REP OtM T M T R s T H J L c H M p 0 u u I c E A 0 A lJ E A A T R N p H A R R G L " c L A p N L E G T D (J l K G M L H E: t: t u E M I u I E: y y y R t T A N N L R v R 5 L 0 s I T I v E: N R 0 A c y A s T PRECINCT 114 257 154 99 2 161 90 3 19 1 4 58 148 103 PRECINCT 11 5 410 286 117 1 312 90 1 3l9 3 67 275 114 PRECINCT 116 304 143 14 7 5 193 99 2 196 3 87 !SC 136 PR~CINCT 117 383 251 121 2 4 2 13 1 04 3 3 11 2. 62 25c 11 7 PRECINCT 118 4 03 261 130 2 3 308 93 324 3 66 271 121 PRECINCT 119 289 145 132 7 179 1 02 l 202 5 13 136 145 PREC INCT 1 20 334 184 145 l 2 206 124 2 40 84 171 147 PRECINCT 1 21 213 10 102 l l 123 87 l 146 1 63 104 103 PRECINCT 122 157 a~ 66 3 109 4o 118 l 36 7d 76 PRtC lNCT 1 23 4 32 19( 224 2 12 231 199 l 251 7 160 173 L4~ PRECINCT 124 447 ll2 224 b 4 246 190 3 284 7 148 205 L31 PKE:CINCT 125 382 l 6 4 209 l 3 203 l o9 2 230 5 134 158 211 PRECINCT 126 3 78 2 1 ~ 148 9 6 237 138 2. 280 5 87 2 lt 1~ 9 PRt CIN CT 12 7 445 25( 187 3 l 290 152 l 38 l 90 237 194 PREC INCT 128 458 24.! 204 4 3 301 147 l 334 l 100 241 l '.16 PREC INCT 129 4 8 1 271 199 ~ 321 152 1 313 3 g4 28S 172 PRECINCT 130 374 1 9.: 172 2 3 2 18 149 2 2o.3 5 CJ'? 187 180 PRECINCT 131 414 22.:3 182 4 3 265 145 1 295 6 102 Ll1 1 8~ PRECINCT 1 32. 372 1 6~ 189 5 3 198 164 6 231 s 117 159 205 PRE:CINCT 133 47/j 35~ 113 2 1 394 7 2 3 413 3 55 352 llC PRE:C INCT 134 383 203 171 l 1 231 149 2 286 90 195 160 PRE:CINCT 135 396 206 174 6 4 231 162 2 2.79 4 105 195 194 PREClNCT 136 351 2lt 129 2 248 101 l 269 70 205 13 1 PRECINCT 13 7 303 140 156 3 3 146 150 3 188 4 105 140 156 PRECINCT 138 521 L53 259 1 0 2 305 2 1 8 2 357 ~ 1 ~2 264 252 PRE:CINCT 139 356 156 19 1 3 3 199 150 6 252 b 85 16C, 18(, PRt:CINCT 140 290 l 1 :2 170 6 l 142 144 l 19 7 3 d7 120 160 PREC I NCT 141 329 1 2~ 193 3 4 16 1 159 6 196 9 llo 135 184 PRECINCT 142 405 186 213 3 l l. 12 l 8ts 4 255 138 167 224 PKECINCT 143 322 13C 1 87 3 160 159 2 199 3 113 135 l bC PREC I NCT 144 332 10.:i 214 3 3 144 179 5 201 ., 105 l4C l6 b PRECINCT 145 339 13; 1 88 2 3 l :2 182 2 2ll 6 115 142 l ts6 PRE:CINCT 146 294 13 1 153 2 150 142 l d6 3 94 129 151 PRECINCT 147 413 16l 242 l l 208 201 252. 4 142. 106 226 PRECINCT 148 4 35 l 6t 255 5 5 190 2.36 6 273 t 141 16C 259 PK E:C I NCT 149 358 1 9~ 159 3 2l.4 130 l 257 5 81 l6E: 16'? PRE:CINC.T 150 418 l 6i1 241 ij 4 201 2.08 2 236 12 154 164 23b PRECINCT 1 5 1 372 113 241 3 14 141 2 lo 6 1 7 2. 9 177 127 23C PREC INCT 152 3 1 5 5 1 233 22 73 233 3 93 9 189 66 2l. 5 PRECINCT 153 400 22 3 1 2 5 5~ 28 356 3 62. 8 2.84 39 329 PREC I NCT 154 3 12 2 7 229 1 53 29 265 3 62 11 l. 13 33 263 PREC INC.T 155 246 16 186 6 3l 18 2 17 1 37 6 189 1 9 211 PRf:ClNCT 156 331 35 l.54 3 35 34 282 5 75 7 l.24 48 L62 PRECINCT 157 3 76 4~ 280 6 41 55 311 3 82 16 252 5 1 305 PRECINCT 158 274 3( 2 17 l 25 28 240 62 2 19 7 2 ; 241 PREC INCT 159 419 17 ~ 230 4 5 2 16 198 3 258 5 135 183 2 13 PRECINCT 160 414 174 229 6 241 l o~ 2 295 5 l OY 204 .l04 PKECINCT 1 6 1 3 17 14 ~ 160 4 2 176 136 2 192 5 111 142 163 PRECINCT 162 459 170 2 76 3 4 2 19 231 5 253 11 180 172 271 PREC I NCT 163 313 129 176 ~ 1 155 150 5 1 84 8 113 133 174 PREC I NCT 164 364 1 5 7 195 6 5 189 lt9 4 232 b J.17 151 ~Cl PRECINCT 165 188 71 102 l 5 99 85 11 5 4 63 93 89 PRECINCT 166 188 ! Ct 75 2 120 64 2 13d 3 39 107 6b PR EC I NCT 16 7 4 6'- 28 7 161 7 333 12 1 4 348 6 98 30C 142 PR EC. I"11CT 168 33d 19'- 1 34 5 2 234 93 7 2 46 8 8 1 209 122 PREC I NC.T 169 333 21: 108 5 l 239 80 4 247 4 66 222 9 7 PREC I NCT 170 3 74 1 86 1 8 1 2 240 130 l 260 4 9 7 2.20 140 PRECINCT 171 3 10 15( 150 l l05 94 1 2. 1 3 6 77 188 107 PRE:C I NCT 172 256 12( 125 2 l 150 100 160 3 77 138 104 . I' TOTAL SUP DI ST 3 ; 1027 l 0659 40S ~312 1 3L42 )163 l )560 9533 ldd l 1294 143 2~6 1)697 STATE:ME:N T Uf All V JTt:~ CAS r AT THE: G L ~ERA L ELEC TIUN NUVEMBEk 3 1 19 70 t' AtL 16 US SE:NA TOK US KEP . DI ST . 13 5 T . SLN . Dl !: T. 24 ST.ASM . u l ST. 36 REP OEM A/1 p / F REP OEM A/1 REP All LEM Kt:P lJEM T M T R s T H J l (, t- M p 0 u u l c E A 0 A 0 t A A T R N p H A R i{ b L k c L A p N L E G T D 0 l R G M L H E E: E u E H I (J I E y y y R E T A ~ ,. L R v R s L 0 s I T I v E N R u A c y A s T PREC lNCT 17.3 280 142 13 1 2 l 176 96 l 183 7 73 140 126 PRECINCT 174 278 14t 12.~ 2 l 1 89 84 1 2.0 1 3 t.3 14; 1L3 PRE CINCT 175 314 15~ 147 2 3 19 7 110 l 2 11 l 92. 161 140 PRE:CINCT 176 348 15t 1 85 2 2 19 1 2 1 2 2.17 6 115 178 1 5; PRECINCT 177 29 5 15. 133 2 l 1 97 94 203 3 8 !) 17 ~ 119 PRECINCT 178 280 11 ~ 162 2. 144 128 4 157 3 111 114 156 PRtCINCT 179 325 1 8 1 135 l l 2 17 100 2 211 3 104 165 147 PRECINCT 180 3 1 2 15~ 148 l 2 190 116 l 204 3 94 15 7 140 PRtCINCT 1 8 1 4 04 22~ 168 7 269 12 7 3 290 3 1 04 2.4 168 PRECINCT 182 246 12( 11 ~ 0 1 54 82 6 l~ ~ 8 &2 1 3 1 11 PRtCINCT 183 4 08 22~ 173 t 277 125 3 2.98 6 100 238 163 PRECINCT 184 263 111 14~ t l 153 1 06 3 1 5 4 7 100 13 4 125 PRt:CI NCT 185 300 1 3 ~ 162 2 l 172 124 172 l 117 141 150 PRE CINCT l 8t 2 7 8 1 3 ! 1 3~ ~ l 163 112 2 174 3 94 13 5 136 PREC INCT 18 7 2 23 l O! 112 3 143 75 2 l 3L 1 82 1C9 10 4 PREC INCT 188 232 9 ~ 13 3 l 136 9 1 l 136 2. 83 102 12 1 PRECINCT 189 3 30 17i 149 2 13 102 9 2 17 6 l OL 182 142 PRECINCT 190 19 5 7( 118 1 l 90 104 100 3 85 8 1 106 PRECINCT 1 9 1 241 10 1 133 l l 131 1 07 12 7 2 10 l 104 130 PR ECINCT 192 314 14! 158 4 2 198 111 4 18 7 7 113 l 6S 139 PRECINCT 193 267 1 3~ 129 l 2 175 91 173 2 85 143 11 5 PRECINCT 19 4 239 l QC 12 3 4 129 103 3 132 5 93 106 12 4 PREC I NCT 195 204 102 95 5 l 130 6 9 5 140 3 5o 96 96 PREC INCT 196 75 4 0 34 4 8 23 3 50 4 17 41 30 PRE:CINCT 1 97 252 96 149 6 l 1 37 112 3 1 2 ~ 5 119 100 14 7 PRlCINCT 198 240 125 112 5 2 158 80 6 1 54 5 8 llb 12.4 PKE: C.I NCT 199 235 12( 1 0 7 2 l 164 o4 143 3 75 119 105 PRt:C I NCT 2.00 42 5 27 L. 146 l l 3 10 110 l 3 24 l 95 2 12 146 PKt:C. IN CT 2.0 1 358 20 ~ 153 2 256 100 l .250 l 100 l 1 & 15 1 PRt CINCT 202 290 14 136 4 196 93 .200 6 7o 16 4 1~ 3 PRE:C I NCT 20_j 2 1 2 102 105 1 l 125 82 3 135 3 70 llC 95 PREC INCT 204 249 115 13C 2 lt8 76 4 1 ~9 3 86 1 34 113 PRECI"4CT 205 12 3 6( 6 1 l 74 4 8 80 3 40 65 57 PREC I NCT 206 1 57 l Ot 47 2 108 44 2 118 33 9 ~ 52 TOTAL SUP DI ST 4 19198 4 39~ 30 t3 2 10 9 18 ~92.9 tl t1 4 i- 5 73 95 p 80b 76 l .2L f.t74 ~ STATEMENT UF ALL V O T E~ CAST AT THL GENERAL cl tCTI CN NUVtMLLR 3 , 1Y70 PA&t: 17 US SENA TOK U~ KE: P. DI SJ.l j ST.SEN . 0 1 S f. L4 ST.ASM . OIST :io REP OEM A/I P/F REP OE fi. A/ I Rl:P A/ l LEM KEP OtM T M T R s T H J l c t- M p 0 u u I c E A u A c t A A T R N p H A t{ R G l K c L A p N l E G T D (J l K G M l H t E E: u f: M I 0 I E y y y R E T A t\ "' l R v R s L 0 s I T I v E N R 0 A c y A s T PRl:CINCT 207 388 17c 2 06 2 l 232 153 l l.49 5 1 24 195 177 PRECINCT 208 270 147 1 2 1 1 80 81 3 186 l 78 162 103 PRlCINCT 209 2 52 108 139 1 141 1 05 2 148 4 94 13 3 llC PRtCINCT 2 10 276 131 138 2 1 89 dO 3 1 8 6 1 76 163 l OLt PRt:CINCT 211 278 15~ 12 0 2 195 79 3 203 l 71 183 9 1 PRECINCT 2 12 258 10 ~ 137 4 3 142 1 08 2 160 2 8U 12 7 112 PHEClNCT .l l 3 276 15~ 115 1 l 19 2. 77 3 20 8 4 51 17 s 9C PRECINCT 214 464 27 8 1 85 321 137 3 359 L 86 2 91 159 PRECINCT 2 1 5 3 04 172 129 2 2. 27 73 1 226 5 63 200 89 PRECINCT .2 16 315 150 1 5 5 4 2 191 116 3 186 4 106 16 4 13 1 PRECINGT 2 17 245 1 3 1 1 04 3 l 1 56 83 2 171 2 59 14; 85 PKE:CINCT 2 18 300 17 ~ 11 6 2 1 1 96 96 3 207 3 J tj lo3 1 04 PR EC INCT 2 19 264 1 3 t 12 3 1 1 83 78 171 6 7o 15 5 99 PRE:C.INCT 2 20 378 22"l 13t j 2 259 108 3 2 8 8 8 65 23(: 125 PRECINCT 221 366 2tl 98 3 288 12 3 301 5 56 L.66 92 PRECINCT 222 231 10 ~ 116 2 131 92 2 loO 2. 62. 12. 4 1 7 PRECINCT 223 l.11 l 5 f 111 1 l 183 8 4 3 197 2 71 16 1 103 PRECINCT 2 24 296 2lt 69 2 238 4 8 260 l 23 23.2 53 PRECINCT 225 233 62 16 .11 1 95 13 1 2 9 7 7 1 L." 85 133 PRECINCT 22.6 245 8 f; 147 l 1 12 1 117 2 126 3 106 108 12 5 PREC INCT 227 314 12" 1 86 2 188 119 4 198 2. 108 169 139 PRE CINCT 228 342 1 0 -' 23 l. 2 175 158 3 167 6 15 !: 146 183 PRE:ClN CT 229 285 117 1 64 144 132 1 1!9 1 llu 13 4 136 PRECINCT 230 244 7 158 l l 2b 110 4 127 5 103 99 132 PRECINCT 231 252 77 160 4 l 117 125 4 111 7 113 9 1 14 c; PRECINCT 2. 32. 2 38 l OS 116 4 135 94 1 5 1 3 66 123 9 7 PR EC.INCT 233 2 84 9 5 180 3 3 1 37 141 2 1L8 4 1 3 7 110 154 . PRECINCT 234 207 54 135 3 3 85 1 06 4 9 2 7 tl9 7 .2 119 PRE:.CINCT 235 258 1 C3 146 l l 140 111 2. 147 2. 10 1 llE 12 c; PR EC INCT 236 258 9c 153 2 2. 127 12 1 6 141 0 10 ! 110 l4C PRECINCT 231 2 53 11 Li 132 4 142 106 2 1 57 6 8J 13S l lJ2 PRECINCT 238 341 2 0 1 138 232. 103 3 251 3 8 1 2. l C 12 1 PRECINCT 239 3 34 16 j 155 6 217 108 4 2. 2b 5 so 206 110 PRf:CINCT 2 40 198 8G 108 l 106 86 112 l 71 8 1 l Oc PRECINCT 2 41 9 7 52 4 0 2 l o l 31 4 60 3 30 53 .j9 PRE CINCT 2 42 2 52 l Ot 138 2 145 102 2 143 5 ~6 125 116 PRECINCT 2 43 113 5 l. 53 l 1 62 45 l 71 3 25 59 44 PRE:CINCT 2 44 29 15 14 20 8 1 17 11 15 12 PRECINCT 2. 45 417 2 5 Li 155 5 307 1 04 4 321 4 84 2o9 135 PRECINCT 2 46 219 103 112 l 135 8 1 150 1 66 117 95 PRECINCT 2 47 3 81 2 3 8 13 4 2 l 2 11 10 1 l 2.92 3 79 250 119 PRECINCT 2 48 353 2 03 143 l 226 119 3 2.53 4 82 2 2. 8 114 PRECINCT 2 49 313 157 141 12 198 10 1 10 219 11 74 186 llS PRECINCT 250 3 18 180 130 l 226 88 2 18 2. 90 188 115 PRECINCT 25 1 4 5 5 237 208 5 3 305 145 3 307 1 132 274 162 PR ECINCT 252 418 2 .l7 180 5 l 2.69 139 7 282 2 128 2. 4 3 166 PRE:C.I NCT 253 502 296 198 5 367 130 l 380 l 116 3 40 155 PREC I NCT 254 253 14 1 01 l 1 154 95 2 177 2 70 1 57 9 1 PREC INCT 255 3 43 21 ~ 117 3 l 24L 89 8 246 3 do 24C S6 PRECINCT 2 56 3 04 1 54 143 5 190 108 2 204 l 93 l d 5 109 PRE CINCT 2 57 141 1 t. 62 2 84 50 2 90 L 41 77 54 PRECINCT 258 64 14 4 8 l 29 32 l 2.6 3 3 1 15 45 PRECINCT 259 252 119 123 3 l l b6 76 2 16 1 3 79 13S 102 PRECINCT 260 299 13t 150 5 178 112 3 182 7 9b 15 117 PRECINCT 261 3 23 1 6 1 150 7 2 2 12 1 02 6 2.2.3 11 a 4 19 1 123 PRf:CI NCT 262 255 109 1 36 2 l 154 9 6 l 154 5 79 118 116 PRECINCT 263 190 1 2 1 5 7 l 2 141 44 1 5 1 3 3 1 1 37 47 PRECI NCT 2.64 326 158 1 57 3 2. 1 9 1 1 2 1 4 1 97 7 9d 176 1 24 PRE:CINCT 265 260 8;; 166 l :SO 12.8 llb 5 118 99 134 PRECINCT 266 2. 81 101 176 5 156 1.22 3 143 6 1 2U 118 149 PRECINC.T 267 78 4 2 33 l 52 24 4 6 3 ~4 43 32 TC.TAL SUP DI ST 5 l 6966 8056 4 d 15931 l L087 028 : 730 d418 147 1 0608 154 2.33 ~ 5 1 3 STAT EMENT Or ALL VuTtS CA~ T AT THE btNERAL t LtCTION NUVLM8 t K 3 , l 9 7C PA{,E: 1 8 US SE:NA TOR US K.E:P . DI !T. 13 ~ T . SEN . UI Sl . 2.4 ! T. ASM . DI ST .36 REP DEM A/I P / F REP DEM A/ I kl: t' A/l LtM Kt P l l:M T M T R s T H J L (, ~ M p 0 u u I (, E A 0 A 0 E A A T K. N p H A R R G l R (, L A p N L E: " T D u L R G M l H E: E E u E M I (j I E y y y R t: T A " t'4 l K v R s l 0 s I T l v E N K (J A c y A s T TOTAL SUP DI ST l ] 5223 7139 1 64 15 952 l D362 tl47 7117 7592 93 9021 69 174 75 12 TOTAL SUP DI ST 2 4- 0864 l 1414 261 9827 l tzl83 / 2.69 l l C8 7 853t: 182 l 0456 146 3!! :l60ti TOTAL SUP DI ST 3 ~ ' 1027 l 0659 4 0.i C:i3 l 2 l ~ 242 J763 1 b56C ~ 533 188 l l2.94 143 2.96 ~o9 7 TOTAL SUP DI ST 4 919S 4399 3( 3210 ~ 9 1 8 2929 41&4 4573 95 5806 76 12.2 t745 TOTAL SUP DI ST 5 ] 6966 805t 4 t 5931 1 1087 :)028 ~7 30 84lt 147 1 0608 154 2.33 ~5 1 3 SUB TOTALS ~ 32 7 ~ I. 166i 9 12 3 4232 5 2792. 2. . 136 3 j67 t 3 8652 705 4 7185 588 . 180 4 0075 ABSENTEE: TOTAL S 3747 1530 45 1198 12 579 964 l 348 1209~ 26 2452 29 48 22 10 GRANO TOTALS ~ 7025 I. 3 197 957 3 5430 5 p37l 2 7100 4 1026 4 0741 731 4 9637 617 228 4 2285 . STAT EM ENT OF ALL VO Tc 5 LAST AT THE GENERAL El c CT l (J t~ NUVt:Mt:iEK 3, 19 70 PAG t 19 STA TE 5UP T. SUPRtME:. COURT J UDGES PUtj llC I NSTR. CH I EF ASSOCIAT E T K R w w B B p p 5 s 0 A I I{ R u u E E: u u T F L I I R R T r L L A F t: (;, K K E c L L L E s H H E: E R R I I R T T 5 s v v v T A A 0 y N N T E . c A y y y y s E: N E N E: N E N r s 0 s CJ s 0 s u PREC INCT 0 0 1 297 111 177 175 3 1 166 34 160 41 162 4 3 PREC1NC.1 002 325 14 ~ 166 192. 3 9 19 1 34 1/2 50 171 52 PRECINCT 003 2 92 115 16 1 1 6 7 39 1 54 44 148 4 8 145 53 PRECI NCT 004 371 17C 180 1 9 7 39 190 38 173 52 175 5C PRECINCT 005 257 9 143 140 3 1 138 29 124 39 125 40 PRE CINCT 006 334 104 1 86 167 34 154 4 0 149 40 143 41 PRE CINCT 007 254 121 123 140 28 138 28 12 l 4 4 119 43 PREC. INCT 008 336 1 3~ 185 196 30 186 3 1 177 4 8 172 47 PRt CINCT 009 2 56 11 ~ 126 153 2 1 148 26 124 52 12. l: 'tS PRt CINCT 0 10 4 25 13i 2.62 234 51 221 56 20t 72 2 10 (:9 PREC INCT 011 403 1 5CJ 226 236 31 227 34 200 ~_j 20l: 52 PREC INCT 0 12 386 1 6~ 2.00 2 10 3o 197 41 166 12 16 't 77 PRE:C INCT 0 13 29b 1 2 ~ 16( 190 1 9 192 17 153 56 156 55 PREC IN(.T 0 14 2 72 11 ~ 1 5 2. 1 5 4 20 15 1 19 119 47 12 1 43 PREC INCT 0 15 422 17 ~ 232 2.39 39 244 31 192 d9 19 c 7 c; PRtC INCT 0 16 369 l4i 200 2 13 41 204 4 5 176 7.3 176 7 2. PREC INCT 0 17 280 14 123 178 18 173 18 140 53 145 47 PRE CINCT 0 18 385 14i 222 2 19 28 2 15 25 176 59 179 56 PRELINCT 0 19 463 12. ~ 314 2 49 41 238 40 223 o l 2 18 6L PREC I NCT 020 473 l 7 ( 285 2 7 8 4 8 269 46 253 62 2. 55 63 PREC INCT 021 3 40 1 37 195 211 3 1 206 34 183 4 8 176 53 PREC INCT 022 311 89 216 171 39 165 38 158 43 1 6 1 4 2. PREC INCT 023 408 1143 279 222 35 22.2 34 208 48 207 4 8 PRE:CINCT 024 4 06 147 2 4 5 2.33 47 227 47 l. 1 2 6J 2 1 2 6 7 PREC INCT 025 72 3 5 36 4 3 7 44 7 34 17 3 3 l t PREC INCT 026 108 5 47 6 1 14 54 13 4 6 l.5 4C 26 PRE CINCT 027 362 171 172 2.29 33 2 12 4 6 l d8 6~ l t3 5 6c PRE CINCT Ol.8 3 57 142 203 l.21 24 2 17 l.9 1 88 s; l 'il 4 4 8 PH.t:C INCT 029 372 172 18 1 1 84 43 171 5 1 l o7 4 9 1 6 6 5 1 PRE:CI NCT 030 3 10 111 173 17 0 2 7 168 2.6 1 ~9 36 15& 34 PRE:C INCT 031 388 1 5( 228 2 4 2 37 234 3 7 220 5 1 Ll7 4 5 PRE:CI NCT 032 4 38 17 ~ 252 2 4 8 28 235 ~3 2 11 60 2 1C , & PRE CI NCT 033 418 l 6 Li 23 7 2.50 34 241 39 211 oo 222 6b PREC INCT 034 386 1 5~ 2 19 208 3 1 203 32 190 5 1 1 84 52 PREC I NCT 035 302 lll 170 146 33 142 32 132 4 6 1 24 44 PREC INCT 036 3 54 13 j 19 1 l.08 2. 1 190 29 192 33 193 29 PRE CI NCT 037 393 17 193 2. 1 6 31 203 40 178 6 7 175 66 PRECINCT 038 335 1 5 ~ 166 168 4 5 160 4 6 150 ; 7 l SC SS PRt: I ~ CT 039 364 145 202 206 25 l.03 28 187 43 1 84 45 PRECINCT 0 40 314 12 i 178 1 8 7 l.9 18 4 3 1 171 43 173 4 2 PREC INCT 0 41 419 205 199 262. 33 249 39 192 106 196 S8 PRtC.INCT 0 4 2 212 80 118 12 ; 20 122 17 112 28 114 2c PRf:CINCT 0 43 360 2 0 -li 142 2 12 29 2 06 32 1 6~ /4 170 65 PRECINCT 0 44 307 92 1 94 l 8L 3 7 176 38 156 58 1 54 55 PREC IN CT 0 4 5 291 130 140 179 28 167 34 132 74 129 73 . f GTAL SUP DI ST l l 5223 8399 ~4 3 7 L5 14 ~ 4 17 ~3 71 ~ 1 29 8 7 2 1 j 403 1 500 74 93 - PRECINCT 046 PRlCINCT 047 PRE:CINCT 048 PREC I NCT 0 49 PRECINCT 050 PRECINCT 051 PRtCINCT 052 PRECINCT 053 PRECINCT 054 PKECINCT 055 PRECINCT 056 PRECINCT 057 PRt:CINCT 058 PRECINCT 059 PRE:CINCT 060 PRECINCT 061 PRECI~CT 062 PRECINCT 063 PRE:\.INC. T 064 PREC INCT 065 PRECINCT 066 PRE:CINCT 067 PRt:ClNCT 068 PRECI NCT 069 PRE:CINCT 0 10 PRECINCT 0 71 PRE:CINCT 0 72 PRE:C I NCT 0 73 PREC INCT 074 PRtCINCT 0 7 5 PRECINCT 070 Pl{CINCT 0 77 PRECINCT 0 78 PRECINC.T 079 PRtCINCT 080 PRECINCT 081 PRt:C IN CT 082 PRECINCT 08.3 PREC IN CT 084 PRECINCT 085 PRECINCT 086 PREC INCT 087 PRECINCT 088 Pi{ECINCT 089 PRECINCT 090 PR EC INCT 091 PRECINCT 092 PREC INCT 093 PREC IN CT 094 PRE:C INCT 095 PRE:CINCT 096 PRtC INCT 091 PRE:CINCT 098 PRECINCT 099 PRECINCT 100 PRECINCT 101 PREC lNCT 102 PREC I NCT 103 PKECINCT 104 PREC INCT 105 PKECINCT 106 PRECINCT 10 7 PRECINCT 108 PRECINCT 109 PRECINCT 110 PREC I NCT 111 PRECINCT 112 PREC INCT 113 OTAL SUP DIST 2 STATEMENT OF All VUT E ~ C.A5T AT THE GENERAL ELECT I U~ T 0 T A L v 0 T E c A s T 287 298 207 270 286 192 343 320 267 178 215 357 389 307 2 75 240 276 354 297 226 347 354 364 2.17 255 325 282 338 324 241 257 304 348 309 33 27 249 22 1 306 237 236 271 289 258 288 302 349 2d 405 477 367 3d8 28 294 350 350 337 366 304 327 304 323 498 399 355 207 433 285 $TA Tt SUPT . P U8L IC INSTR. R R A I F l F E E s R T y 66 194 81 189 5b 138 93 154 7 0 190 43 116 l C9 200 120 181 SC 140 4 102 8 113 1 2 7 195 15 210 12 159 8 174 11 113 12 121 14 1 '16 7 204 95 117 15 168 l 2S 205 1 81 174 141 120 12 123 13 162 13 131 13 1 88 16 13 c; 8 1 .38 10 148 10 168 12 20 10 189 15 14 14 10 9 131 8 110 10 153 8 133 6 143 12 123 82 1 81 9 149 10 149 10 169 13 192 11 145 12 254 19 269 l j 222 14 225 11 15 9 182 12 20! 14 19C 12 1 193 15 19 7 10 178 10 206 11 1 8.3 10 210 224 253 13 4 253 111 229 9 108 231 160 0864 11589 864 SUPRE1'1f: COURT C.HltF w R I G H T y E: s 157 163 115 140 154 83 186 168 146 82 116 203 22 1 158 149 132 152. 197 139 116 195 190 239 135 153 L02 13 7 174 192 128 135 154 185 1 57 183 1 2 7 129 109 148 121 103 13 1:1 l.?3 160 158 182 195 139 202 302 208 223 162 164 L03 1 91 185 2 13 177 179 1 8 1 1 84 300 24 2 192 115 236 174 11437 w R I G H T N 0 39 30 l ij 36 31 2 7 38 41 28 2 1 15 25 40 21 .33 2C 29 32. 32 1 8 32 40 16 25 19 25 25 25 29 35 33 32 2 7 ~4 28 34 24 30 36 32 45 2 7 32 28 29 24 35 36 48 54 4ti 42 32 42 36 41 32 39 30 44 32 32 38 2.L 47 32 47 20 119 JUOC,ES ASSOCIATE B u R K E y E s 154 162 115 140 142 87 176 159 138 73 115 196 221 154 145 124 137 l d9 134 115 189 1 87 239 131 151 182 126 106 19 1 125 124 156 173 151 164 113 114 102 138 113 96 139 152 154 149 168 186 130 193 288 201 22 1 lol l.?8 200 187 182 1 9~ 159 171 169 182 2tO 237 189 110 231 l to l 971 B u R K E N c 3 7 28 15 31 29 22 36 41 2.9 25 17 2o 41 20 31 18 33 4tl 33 24 33 40 19 23 lo 39 31 29 27 36 34 29 35 43 34 31 2 7 32 36 .33 48 24 28 29 33 3 1 30 38 51 59 50 39 30 38 35 35 3 1 44 39 50 35 33 53 21 46 34 44 20 258 NOVt:1"1 1J LI- p I: T E R 5 y I: s 148 162 109 135 130 d6 167 14.5 127 70 94 l o9 194 l.34 136 112 ll!: 162. 120 89 170 168 193 115 133 l .:iO 110 151 l 6t$ 116 114 145 161 l.;7 151 103 104 92 136 105 95 132. 146 132 1 31 157 173 121 185 2.67 194 200 162 147 174 166 166 180 153 166 156 170 241 220 184 10.:) 2 10 1~8 l 001 p t T t k s N l.J 40 29 20 .:S !: 34 21 46 50 38 LB 2. j 54 61 37 3d 33 .52 66 43 41 51 57 65 32 :i 1:1 75 48 52 48 43 43 39 36 52 47 51 38 46 37 41 45 34 35 44 44 40 44 38 ': 7 79 63 62. 30 .50 52 57 46 65 45 56 44 43 79 37 49 40 o3 2 7 096 3 , 1970 s L L L I v A N y E s 148 156 10.5 134 133 83 166 152 l:i 2 71 104 106 194 138 141 112 l L-. .'.:I. 167 122 92 106 16 1 191 115 130 138 105 146 171 114 11 14 7 162 l3S !SC 102 104 89 130 10(: 93 132 147 14G l 3c 162 175 12L 18c 264 187 203 163 147 ld2 16 ;; 17C 175 162 171 163 176 243 2 16 179 101 210 155 l 0.54 s u L L I v A N N u PAut 3t 36 l (j 39 3t 2C 3 4o J3 26 25 52 o3 36 36 3.3 44 59 42 42 52 56 63 39 45 75 49 55 47 43 41 .37 47 51 43 46 3d 4L 40 38 50 35 3~ 43 39 36 43 39 58 1:1 l 71 61 2S 51 4 SC 43 66 40 46 3 7 3& 72 37 53 41 68 3C 050 lC STATEMENT O~ ALL VUTLS CAST AT THE GENERAL tlEC.T I GN NUVLM~lR 3, 1970 PA(,l 21 STATE. 5UPT . SUPRl:Mf: CuURT JUDGES PU8LlC I NS TR. CH lE:f ASSOCIATE: T R R ~ w B B p p s s 0 A I K R u u I: E lJ u T F L l l R K T T L L A F u G K K E E: L L L E 5 H H E E R R I I R T T 5 s v v v T A A 0 y 114 N T E c A y y y y s E N N : N t N T s u s c s c $ u PKE:CINCT 114 257 106 143 158 22 149 28 132 42 135 41 PREC INCT 115 410 200 189 228 28 215 3 1 19 1 53 186 51 PREC INCT 116 304 157 128 162 29 148 29 146 2.9 15L 28 PRECINCT 117 383 lj2 178 245 30 235 40 199 11 201 74 Pt{ EC l NCT 118 403 1 8~ 206 l.64 17 259 26 222 6 7 223 65 PREC INCT 119 289 11 ~ 159 166 l ! 162 17 148 2~ 144 30 PRECINCT 120 33'1 l3E 18t; 198 31 194 25 l 6H 54 169 49 PREC INCT 1 21 213 6~ 134 108 42 104 46 96 5! c, 6 54 PREC INCT 122 157 6( 86 78 20 74 19 66 2.4 6(;; 2~ PRECINCT 123 432 14; 277 234 49 224 52 2 1U 6 ij 2 14 t l PRt:C INCT 124 447 182 25( 265 SC 2!3 ~5 l.36 6 7 L40 o l PRECINCT 125 382 1 2 ~ 239 203 42 203 43 196 45 1S2 47 PREC INCT 126 3 78 15t 217 2 48 3 c. 244 32 222 53 224 50 PR EC I NCT 1 27 445 19 1 236 2 7 0 44 259 48 228 76 231 65 PREC INCT 128 458 20( 235 281 44 2 7 2 5 1 256 57 256 60 PREC IN CT 129 4 81 1 8 i 282 294 56 290 51 261 79 266 73 PRECINCT 130 374 14~ 221 217 51 209 47 198 60 201 55 PRECINCT 131 414 l?C 229 259 45 255 47 240 63 24 7 52 P ~EC INCT 132 3 72 13L 221 229 52 213 58 207 62 Ll4 5fj PR EC. INCT 133 478 281 174 233 44 2 16 49 l d! 76 186 7 ~ PREC INCT 1 34 383 15L 209 229 3 7 2 19 41 201 5 1 203 5 1 PREC INCT 135 396 143 241 260 45 25? 47 236 65 233 64 PR E:C INCT 136 351 183 160 196 35 191 38 171 !9 172 56 PR EC I NCT 1 37 303 110 178 176 43 167 41 16 1 46 164 4 (:; PRECINCT 138 529 215 300 306 63 301 62 l.77 83 2&5 82 PRE:C INCT 139 356 llt 233 2 16 51 2 13 ~L 202 59 2 0 (:; 5 7 PR1:C INCT 140 290 12; 159 165 41 163 42 148 ~4 1 51 52 PkEC I NCT 141 329 12t 195 1 84 48 180 47 173 S2 173 46 PRE:\.INCT 142 4 05 171 221 240 45 2 18 54 202 68 207 63 PRECI NCT 143 322 l4i 170 212 35 200 39 189 ~2 1 8~ 51 PRt:CINCT 144 332 12L 191 208 35 207 34 192 43 l 98 44 PRE:C INCT 145 339 130 19 7 214 50 208 47 l ':J 2 58 197 57 PKE:C IN C.T 146 294 11 .i 1 64 1 66 44 1~ 9 42 1 ~ 4 4 I 15; 43 PK EC INCT 147 413 15( 252 25 7 47 250 45 230 64 234 62 PREC INCT 148 435 15( 2 71 258 53 255 55 230 7 5 230 7b PRECINCT 149 35& 12S 2 12 2 19 45 2 12 47 193 65 192 61 PREC INCT 1 50 418 14E 25C 236 55 217 63 209 66 2 12 71 PREC INC.T 1 51 372 111 23 7 164 52 177 !6 173 60 171 65 PREC I NCT 1 52 3 15 51 251 133 51 135 4 2 125 50 1L8 44 PRtCINCT 153 400 11 380 153 7 8 150 77 149 76 15 1 71 PRE. INCT 1 54 3 12 lt 288 110 73 112 66 105 66 1C5 69 PREC INCT 155 246 13 229 96 63 94 60 9 7 57 93 6C P REC l~CT 156 331 2~ 296 1 53 62 146 61 148 60 148 60 PR EC IN CT 1 57 376 3 7 330 11 8 90 118 88 123 82 125 bC PREC INCT 1 58 274 21 2.52 1 04 55 10 l 59 96 59 10 1 60 PRt:C I NCT 1 59 419 131 2 71 230 5 1 229 51 224 57 2Ll 57 PREC I NCT 160 414 16t 233 260 06 25 1 68 249 71 L45 74 PR EC INCT 1 61 3 17 13l 1 69 163 47 152 49 147 51 146 54 PRt:C. I NCT 162 459 l 5t 286 2ol 6 7 251 70 252 73 c: 4c 7 8 PREC. I NCT 163 313 12 4! 180 196 45 190 48 168 69 170 64 PRECINCT 164 364 13t 214 208 71 204 67 195 7 8 192 81 PREC I NCT 165 188 8~ 96 100 33 10 7 26 94 4 1 SS 42 PRE:C IN CT 166 188 ; c BL 90 20 85 20 77 Ld 76 28 PREC INCT 167 4 64 238 200 231 61 2j3 58 2 19 69 215 7(. PRtC INCT 168 338 163 1 64 196 35 187 -.o 181 4 3 181 43 PRECINCT 169 333 164 1 51 1 84 33 lo9 36 160 46 164 43 PREC INCT 170 374 165 188 2 13 28 2 10 2 7 198 ~() 193 34 PREC I NCT 171 3 10 131 l .:6 145 2 7 144 25 127 39 139 L.7 PR EC INCT 172 256 100 13 7 137 12 132 15 126 16 124 1 5 TOTAL SUP DI ST 3 ~- 1027 l ~ 383 2633 ~699 ~3 1 L 327(;; 17869 l l 74 7 l ~ 372 1 JbOO 1 )675 STATEMENT O~ ALL VUTE:S CAST AT l HE: GENERAL l: LtCTlON NU V ~M8ER 3 . 19 / 0 PAGI: 22. STA TE: SUPT. SUP1(E:1"1E CGLKl J UDGtS PUB LIC I NS TR. CH i l:F ASSOC I ATE T R R w w B B . p s s 0 A I R f{ u u t: E u u T F l I I R R T T l L A F E: G G K K E E l L l E s H H l: c R R I I R l T 5 ~ v v v T A A 0 y N N T E c A y y y y s E N E N E: N E N T s 0 s 0 s 0 s 0 PRE:CINCT 173 2 80 139 113 133 30 129 29 123 31 122 3 4 PRE:CINCT 174 2 7 8 138 133 152 3ij 145 40 143 31 139 46 PR ECINCT 175 314 139 152 149 4 0 147 44 133 53 l 3L 53 PRECINCT 170 3 48 148 l ti2 209 1 0 19 9 80 17S 91 1 81 89 PRE:CINCT 177 29 5 138 l ~ l 170 4 5 106 ~ l 147 o3 1 5 1 64 PREC I NCT 178 280 124 138 153 59 144 6 1 126 78 13C 7 5 PREC IN CT 179 32 5 141 163 l o 4 52 l oO ~6 1 3ti 6d 142 c5 PR ELINC.T 180 3 12 14 ~ 140 167 3o 153 4 3 144 4 141 56 PRECINCT 1 8 1 4 04 199 188 230 50 224 53 204 b9 201 08 PRt:CINCT 182 246 1 0~ 135 141 4 3 139 41 l 2b 55 129 50 PREC INCT 183 408 20:; 193 2 4 3 71 237 71 212 94 l ll 9 4 PR EC I NCT 1 8 4 263 l LC 1 3 ~ 158 42 145 52 150 45 144 ~ l PREC IN CT 185 300 13( 162 176 4 9 172 ~ l 160 70 151 () s PRE:CINCT 186 2 78 1 3( 135 14.5 6 1 145 58 1 3 1 10 141 59 PRECINCT 1 87 223 1 0~ l o.i: l l9 39 123 40 108 54 llC SC PREC I NCT 188 232 9( 126 1L4 4 0 124 37 115 39 llC 46 PRl:C INCT l d'1 330 16S 1 51 185 68 175 7 0 1 57 86 16C 85 PREC I NCT 190 1 9 5 1 ~ 98 1 04 2ti 106 22 'J2 21 95 2 7 PRt CINCT 1 9 1 241 1 01 118 142 l3 134 2 7 128 33 126 33 PRE: CINCT 192 314 1 39 167 203 51 l 'J 4 5 7 180 72 186 68 PR ECINCT 193 267 127 1 26 13 7 52 135 49 120 62 119 66 PkECINCT 1 9 4 2.39 1 0 5 12 1 1:34 33 129 35 12.3 40 125 44 PRt:CINCT 195 204 113 84 1 00 47 94 53 85 63 89 60 PREC INCT 196 75 4 2 23 3 2 13 32 12 31 13 3 1 12 PRE CINCT 1 9 7 252 11 ~ 130 163 55 1 59 54 1 54 bO 148 65 PKEC I NCT 198 246 120 1 21 149 4 6 136 54 llJ 59 132 55 PREC IN CT 199 235 122 94 133 28 123 31 120 38 11 39 PREC I NCT 200 425 202 205 2b3 63 2.56 71 l37 86 234 e ti PRE:C li'fCT 201 358 162 1 8 7 234 4 3 233 42 200 72 1~ 9 72 PKEC INCT 202 290 llS 164 180 43 182 40 164 53 163 55 PREC I NCT 203 2 12 9S 1 04 135 32 132 3 1 115 45 llc 47 PRE:C I NCT 204 249 112 134 16 7 4 2 166 4 2. 152 54 1 5C 57 PREC INCT 205 123 5:; 68 93 10 . 89 13 89 15 8 7 17 PRE:C I NCT 206 157 81 69 73 22 71 18 66 23 6S 2L . TOTAL SUP DI ST 4 9 198 4 5 13 ~ 464 152.t3 Ld7 l 188C i-Lo9 15 70 ) 0';18 t 68l 't683 STATEMENT OF Al l VO TtS GAST AT THE GtNE~AL El ttTlON NlJVE:MBER .j ' 1970 PAbt l3 STATE SUPT. SUPRtME COUKT JUO&E:~ PUBLIC I NSTR . CH I E:F ASSOC I ATE T R R w w B B p p s s l) A 1 R r( u l.J E: [: l.J u T F L I I R R l T l l A F E G G K K E E L L l E s H H E E R R 1 I R T T ! !) v v v T A A 0 y N N T E c A y y y y s E N E N t N E N T s 0 s 0 s u s u PRECINCT 207 388 17! 198 234 60 215 70 209 81 209 75 PRECINCT 208 270 12~ 132 1 54 43 144 50 140 50 145 47 PRfCINCT 209 252 1 1~ 1 21 12.0 47 113 49 111 47 109 5: PRECINCT 210 276 14; 122 156 54 146 52 138 63 145 55 PRECINCT 2 11 278 14 ~ 122 l t:4 49 1 5 7 48 149 57 151 55 PRECINCT 212 258 111 1 24 139 32 136 33 127 42 124 41 PREC INCT 213 276 14 ~ 115 160 44 1 54 43 154 43 151 4 2. PRECINCT 2 14 464i 23~ 199 248 51 235 bO 224 60 229 60 PRE:CINCT 215 304i l oi 114 157 32 145 36 139 3 1 135 37 PRECINCT 216 315 141 145 160 2 7 150 21 141 32 13; 33 PRtCINCT 2 17 245 14 ~ 83 139 25 122 25 121 2d 114 30 Pi{ECINCT 218 300 1 51 132 143 42 135 4 5 125 50 130 42 PREC INCT 2 19 264 141 105 128 40 125 3 7 126 41 122 43 PRECINCT 220 378 18 172 196 41 184 48 169 ';) 1 171 6C PREC INCT 221 366 21 ~ 134 2. 1 c 40 205 38 186 5 7 185 57 PR EC INCT 222 231 119 9~ 130 29 128 24 120 32 122 29 PRELINCT 223 277 13i 12 7 149 2 7 132 37 126 40 126 36 PREC INCT 224 296 1 5~ 121 155 2 7 154 23 145 39 142 42 PREC IN CT 225 233 8 ~ 129 141 35 131 38 110 42 llC 44 PRt:CINCT 226 245 111 106 142 3 7 135 38 133 40 133 3S PRECINCT 227 3 14 17( 136 174 58 162 66 1 51 74 160 69 PRl:CINCT 228 342 156 158 208 38 198 40 183 so 197 45 PRtCINCT 229 285 l 2t 138 155 36 150 36 1 37 39 141 40 PRf:CINCT 230 244 106 122 1 26 23 118 27 113 30 116 32 PRtC INCT 231 252 l OL 132 148 26 141 29 127 44 128 35 PRECINCT 232 238 111 100 111 33 111 29 97 43 1 0 1 39 PRE:C:. I NCT l33 284 12( 150 153 36 149 36 138 40 1 37 33 PRE:CINCT 234 207 9~ 9C 98 29 92 32 90 21 83 34 PRECINCT 235 258 11~ l LC 128 51 119 so 112 5o 106 5 7 PKEC.INCT 236 258 1 2~ 120 152 34 150 33 137 43 143 35 PRECINCT 237 253 128 llo 133 44 122 4b 115 47 110 47 PKE:CINCT 238 341 176 157 196 52 192 5 1 176 65 17C 67 PRE:CINCT 239 334 1 81 133 lt: 2 58 162 53 14': 65 15L 65 PRE:C lNCT 240 198 l Oi 1 2 91 2 7 80 30 7 ' 32 7 5 3C PRECINCT 2 41 9 7 4 t: 3 7 54 13 50 15 47 19 4c 19 PRE:C I NCT 242 252 11~ 121 147 44 142 43 13l 54 145 4 3 PRECINCT 2 43 113 62 3 7 46 12 43 14 37 17 39 17 PREC INCT 244 29 13 14 7 7 8 5 7 5 b 5 PRECINCT 2 45 417 2 4ii 160 204 69 203 70 185 tiO 185 79 PRl:C I NCT 246 219 11.11 99 123 41 121 40 107 4 7 108 4o PRECINCT 247 381 220 152 224 55 220 54 2 13 64 2 1E 58 PRE:CINCT 248 353 1 87 152 1 9 7 48 184 5 1 173 63 171 60 PREC IN CT 249 3 13 159 145 172 71 163 75 153 85 153 b l PRE(.INCT 250 318 163 129 181 40 173 50 1 64 54 15c 59 PRECINCT 251 455 244 193 257 79 239 87 237 93 238 b6 PRECINCT 252 418 219 187 252 62 240 72 228 79 23c 7 5 PRtCINCT 253 502 21" 2 1 5 29 7 64 293 64 l67 85 26 7 82 PREC.INCT 254 253 l.:Si 108 140 47 135 52 lLO 6 1 115 64 PRECINCT 255 3 43 174 154 1 97 47 196 48 184 61 18 l 55 PRECINCT 256 304 171 128 163 61 160 56 141 7 3 147 7C PRE:C I NCT 257 141 62 62 67 13 o5 11 57 18 6 1 17 PRECil\CT 258 6 4 2i 34 36 10 3 1 12 26 14 2:1 15 PRE:CINCT 259 252 1 2~ 105 1 5 1 30 136 32 120 4 2 l .:l 4 33 PRECINCT 260 299 1 2 7 146 143 39 12 7 4o 125 42 1L3 44 PREC I NCT 261 323 171 130 1 75 77 173 74 l Sb 84 154 8 7 PRECINCT 262 255 119 109 1 26 24 119 29 116 25 llc 25 PRECINCT 263 190 11 ~ 63 80 29 77 27 70 29 73 30 PRECINCT 264 326 l 7f 129 1 6 7 4S 152 52 146 51 145 .' 4 PRECINCT 265 260 133 90 143 33 145 29 126 35 1L8 40 PRECINCT 266 287 15( 1 01 163 33 154 43 l ~O 40 1 54 38 PREC I NCT 267 7 8 4 8 19 38 13 34 14 34 15 32 16 TuTAL SUP DIST 5 l 6966 7362 ~43 7 2544 :928 2847 d583 FJllO j 775 :i2 l b d28C STATEMENT Of All VO TtS CAST AT THt GE:~t~A L ELtC TIUN NUVtM8tK j , 197L PA&t 24 STATE SUP T. ~UPKE:ME: COlJRT J UDGES PUBLIC I NSTR. CH i tF A~SOC I A T E T R R w h 8 d p s s 0 A I R K u u t E u u T F L I I R R T T L L A F E (, G K K t E L L L E s H H E E: R R I I R T T s s v v v T A A 0 y 1'4 N T E c A y y y y s E N E N l: N E N T s 0 s c s (J s 0 TOTAL SUP DI ST 1 ] 5223 8399 . 43 7 . 5 14 ~ 417 ~3 7 1 : 129 872 1 3403 1500 7493 TOTAL SUP DIST 2 0864 l 1589 2179 ~258 ~096 3050 '" 7864 1 143 7 1 0971 l )001 1 )054 TOTAL SUP DI ST 3 '" 1027 l 12 383 2633 -'699 33 72 ~2 7 6 7869 l 1747 l L3 72 l 600 l )67 5 TOTAL SUP DI ST 4 9 198 4 5 13 1464 l52d . 872 L880 4269 5 2 70 098 t68l 1083 TOTAL SUP DI ST 5 J 6966 7362 243 7 2544 ~928 ~S 47 :3583 921 0 '3 775 ~~ld 3280 sue TOTALS ~ 3278 '4 424 6 l 0150 1 )5 4 3 l ~685 l 3424 3 4714 4 6385 4 't 6 1 9 4 .000 4 .185 ABSENTEE TOTALS 3747 1 783 2 70 2 79 405 403 1 766 12039 1964 793 L792 GRAND TOTALS ~ 7025 4 6029 l 0420 l 0822 l +090 l 3827 3 64 80 4 d4 2 4 4 :583 4 ~ 793 4 -"J977 STATEMENT UF All VOTE:S CA5T AT TH t: GE~El{Al ELl:CTl uN NOVLMd~r. 3 , 1970 PAul 2~ CUURT OF APPEAL - SECONU DISTRICT DIV . 1 - JUOl1E: DIV . 2 PRl:S .JUO. I JU DGE DIV . 3 - JUDGE T G G l l T T R R c c A A 0 l.J u I I H H c c ( (J l l T s s L l G 0 T T M M L L A T T l l " "' H H p p p p L A A I I p p T ( G u F F E E s s (i (J K R v s s c c I\ N T T 0 0 0 t\ t T N N E c A y y y y y y s E N E N E: "' E N E N E N T s 0 s 0 s 0 s 0 5 0 s 0 PREC INCT 001 297 16 36 168 39 162 34 158 41 162 38 166 33 PRECINCT 002 325 1 8 36 184 36 18! 39 181 43 192 30 186 36 PRECINCT 003 292 15 j 41 145 49 153 39 1!3 4L 154 39 lit6 45 PRECINCT 004 371 18( 40 185 42 181 43 182 44 ldl 37 175 42 PRE:LINCT 005 257 13( 31 127 .31 126 29 126 29 121 33 120 32 PRECINCT 006 334 14 36 142 44 135 41 1 31 47 147 34 140 3; PRECINCT 007 2.54 13'i 30 143 28 132 28 121 38 13L 28 13 1 26 PRcC INCT 008 336 183 32 187 31 175 35 176 36 177 32 175 3C PKECINCT 009 256 13 34 141 33 1 32 40 l2d 48 143 27 142 29 PRE:CINCT 010 425 21 'i 58 22( 63 211 61 210 62 21! 60 214 ' - 04' PRt:C INCT 011 403 22~ 2,9 22~ 33 216 34 201 48 222 26 22. 2 7 P~t:CINCT 0 12. 386 19 ~ 37 20~ 38 196 36 165 73 190 33 187 37 PRE:CINCT 0 13 296 191 17 18 l8 178 21 163 47 184 l tl 1 8 1 21 PREC INCT 0 14 212 14t: 1 14 20 139 24 128 40 l ! 1 16 141 l ; PKE:CINCT 0 15 422. 22 :i 42 241 38 225 44 2.05 69 235 34 2.34 3 7 PRECINCT 0 16 369 2oi 37 20 41 202 4 1 174 63 l.Oj 3! 203 39 PRECINCT 0 17 280 16~ 21 1 7'i 1 ti 160 27 145 45 171 16 170 18 PRECINCT 018 385 20~ 24 202 29 195 33 1 87 44 2.02 2.5 2C2 25 PRECINCT 0 19 4o3 23~ 40 233 41 234 39 223 54 231 38 231 40 PRECINCT 020 473 27i 49 266 48 251 64 269 47 267 47 2 10 46 PRECINCT 021 340 l 9E 34 200 37 188 44 185 4b 199 3b .200 34 PREC INCT 0.22 311 16 32 lo: 30 163 33 159 40 160 34 164 32 PRE:C INCT 023 408 22( 39 222 .36 201 43 Ll3 40 213 35 217 35 PR EC INCT 024 406 2 2 ;; 42 2.28 38 2 15 48 211 52 22.5 31 2.Ll 3c PRECINCT 025 72 4~ 8 45 8 42 9 38 14 4j 8 ~3 8 PRE:CINCT 026 108 55 14 51 16 55 1.3 43 25 54 14 5L 15 PRE:C INCT 027 362 21 37 225 34 204 42 195 53 221 35 219 39 PRtCINCT 028 357 21~ 2d 207 30 195 43 201 39 208 28 213 29 PRECINCT 029 372 176 43 l 71 41 174 45 164 47 174 41 16 7 44 PRECINCT 030 310 16~ 26 164 30 160 25 158 36 160 28 l oO 27 PRECINCT 031 388 23~ 33 22t: 38 2.20 43 228 41 22.4 3d 2.:iO 33 PRECINC.l 032 438 23 31 L3~ 35 224 44 216 55 233 33 226 36 PRECINCT 033 418 241 45 242 4 0 236 45 2L3 56 241 39 231 3b PRECINCT 034 386 19 26 192 36 l&l 36 1 8 1 4 8 194 28 1S4 2 1 PKE:CINCT 035 302 14~ 28 133 37 135 35 lLB 42 13 !: 2~ 132 31 PKECINCT 036 35~ 191 28 1 85 25 190 2 1 1 91 30 185 28 180 2~ PRECINCT 037 393 20 41 205 40 l dl 49 1 87 .! 0 194 38 193 4C PRE:LINCT 038 335 15~ 51 158 49 147 53 143 58 154 46 149 45 PREC INCT 039 364 20C 29 19~ 30 189 36 186 3/ 192. 32 195 25 PRECINCT 040 314 181 29 17 7 32 167 38 167 4 0 178 2.8 179 L9 PRECINCT 041 419 251 31 252 32 235 52 236 47 255 31 253 29 PRECINCT 042 212 11 ~ 17 114 18 120 11 110 2.: 11 tl 14 119 11 PRECINCT 043 360 204 31 20~ 27 189 31 175 62. 202 2.6 200 28 PRtCINCT 044 301 16~ 31 164 .36 165 41 153 48 168 34 164 35 PRECINCT 045 291 17: 31 l 71 32, 163 40 137 66 174 27 176 2 ; . TOTAL SUP DIST 1 l 5223 1479 tl2 71 1684 76o0 . 407 3119 a3os 1 537 79J3 2055 :ill:S6 1451 --- STAT EMENT OF All VUTl:S CA~ l AT THI: ~E:l~ERA l ELEC TIUN NOVE:MUER 3 , 1970 PAGI: 26 CUURT OF AP PE: Al - Sl:C,ONO IJISTKICT DIV. l - J UDGE DIV . 2 PRES. J UD . I JUDuE DI V. 3 - JUlJGE: T G G L l T T R R c c A A 0 u u I I H H c c L 0 L l T s s L l ( c T T M M L L A T T L L M t' H H p p p p L A A I I , p r T u u F F t E s s (. L K K v s ~ c 0 ,. N T T 0 0 0 t\ T N N " E c A y y y y y y s E N E N E: N E N E N E: N T s 0 s 0 s G s 0 s 0 s 0 - PRECINCT 046 28 7 148 36 144 38 150 35 147 3b 152 35 147 37 PRf:CINCT 0 47 298 166 22 l6L 30 169 20 160 2.6 106 L2 159 26 PKECINCT 048 207 114 14 109 17 1 09 16 103 20 10 7 17 104 l S - PREC I,,CT 049 270 135 3 1 128 3 4 13 7 29 122 34 129 32 13 1 2c; PRECINCT 050 286 144 2 7 1 3 7 3 1 1 3~ 32 136 31 141 LB 137 2 7 PRECINCT 051 192 9~ 16 81 23 89 18 1 8 28 90 16 b5 24 PRECINCT 0!2 343 16~ 48 166 4 3 170 3 7 166 43 167 39 172 3 4 PRECINCT 053 320 1 6~ 3 7 1~5 4 0 155 3 7 147 47 160 34 160 36 PRE:C l NCT 054 267 13" 3 1 130 3 1 129 35 127 37 l .jl 3~ 126 3 c; PRECINCT 055 178 7C 30 61 3C 71 29 71 26 13 27 73 27 P RE:C INCT 050 215 1 0~ 15 110 18 104 18 97 24 104 16 10 1 17 PREC INCT 057 357 1 Bi 2~ l d8 3.2 183 30 173 41 185 L! 19 1 . l PRE:C I NCT 058 389 2 1 ~ 44 2 1 4! 38 199 47 201 47 208 39 206 3S PRE:C.INCT 059 307 1 5 1 1 5 1 53 20 144 24 139 30 149 18 147 2C PRECINCT 060 275 14~ 2.4 151 .25 144 31 140 33 14 7 2! 144 LS PRE:CINCT 061 2 4 0 120 18 120 L l 101 3 1 118 20 116 19 117 22 PRECI NCT 062 276 14~ 29 147 28 135 34 121 47 142 29 1 35 32 PRE:CINCT 063 354 185 34 179 38 170 42 157 59 167 Jo 170 33 PREC INCT 064 297 1 2~ 30 131 3 1 124 33 119 39 122 3 1 126 30 PREC INCT 065 22.6 113 1 8 11 8 18 105 24 9~ 34 111 18 113 17 PR EC INCT 066 347 188 3 1 1 82 35 172 4 2 177 39 18:1 3 1 1 87 33 PRlCINCT Oo7 354 168 39 1 76 3 7 159 44 164 49 168 36 173 33 PR EC INCT 068 364 195 25 169 LO 152 28 143 35 16 7 2. l. 17"1 .22 PRECINCT 069 277 128 23 1 32 23 1 24 30 118 31 1 .26 23 1 25 23 PRE:C INCT 0 70 255 1 5 1 19 143 20 144 28 139 3 l4'J 2 1 146 2C PREC I NCT 0 71 325 l 7 ! 35 179 35 149 55 157 54 l 7 d 33 177 35 PRECINCT 0 1.2 282 132 L2 122 25 114 32 113 36 125 25 1 24 2(; PRECINCT 073 338 165 2 7 1 64 3.2 159 32 150 48 160 30 161 30 PREC INCT 0 74 324 192 30 190 3 1 179 38 166 49 191 L6 1 8 1 30 PRE:C INCT 0 7 5 241 12i 30 122 36 111 38 116 39 119 35 118 36 PRE:CINCT 0 76 251 122 32 116 4 0 124 35 llb 39 115 39 117 3 P~ECINCT 077 304 15t 2 7 154 30 156 31 145 39 156 31 l4S 3C. PRE:CINCT 0 78 3 4 8 l 7 i 30 1 7! 32 160 33 160 43 l7S 2.4 170 29 P~lCINCT 079 309 147 44 144 42 138 4o 13.2 52 140 45 138 45 PRECINCT 080 338 158 32 1 5-4 3 7 160 35 1 !5 38 loO 35 152 38 PREC INCT 081 2 74 113 32 110 34 112 34 1 0! 39 118 26 10 7 33 PREC I NCT 082 249 114 2.9 119 28 112 28 103 36 111 .26 1 (;6 29 PREC INCT 083 221 103 3 1 93 3 7 96 35 9 4 3 1 97 33 ;, 9 3C PR E:C INCT 084 306 132 32 13~ 31 128 34 129 38 134 29 130 3 1 PRECINCT 085 237 l OS 36 114 33 107 36 104 39 106 37 108 36 PREC INCT 086 236 92 48 98 38 ~o 49 94 43 98 40 93 46 PRl:CINCT 087 271 135 26 133 30 138 24 1 24 41 132 2 7 13 7 2 4 PRf:CINCT 088 289 152 30 145 35 152 30 14! 35 142 32 150 33 PREC INCT 089 258 147 34 14.2 3 ! 142 37 13 7 38 143 32 143 32 PRECINCT 090 288 140 33 140 34 142 31 130 41 138 32 1 37 3 1 PREC INCT 09 1 302 176 19 1 6I 26 163 32 162 3 1 170 .l. 4 165 24 PRECINCT 092 3 4 9 18 1 38 185 36 183 36 172 44 184 3! 177 4 2 PREC I NCT 093 284 136 .29 136 3 1 132 29 124 38 19 30 128 31 PRECINCT 094 405 l ;.2 5 1 192 50 184 54 184 54 189 4Y 180 5 1 PRE: CI NCT 095 477 282 63 .2 86 65 283 63 266 7 8 2H 1 5d .283 6~ PRECI NCT 096 367 203 47 199 5 1 198 !3 185 67 200 ~ l 204 45 PRl:CINCT 097 388 20~ 47 2 13 4 9 200 56 200 54 2 11 46 2 11 4c PREC INCT 098 284 158 32 155 3 4 154 31 15 1 36 l 5H 25 153 3C PRECINCT 099 294 1 6~ 37 166 34 152 39 149 4 5 154 40 152 3S PREC INCT 100 350 19 1 3o 195 34 188 40 l b4 4 6 1 8'1 35 195 34 PKECINCT 1 0 1 350 179 36 180 38 173 47 172 44 183 35 174 3" PREC INCT 102 337 177 3 1 174 3 7 168 3 1 165 4 164 34 109 34 PRECINCT 103 366 192 44 190 46 190 45 180 59 196 40 191 4 4 PRECINCT 104 304 165 3C 162 33 1!4 40 16 1 3 1 159 33 159 3l: PREC I NCT 1 05 327 17 8 40 176 39 1 69 4 5 173 45 177 38 176 40 PRECI NCT 106 304 168 31 166 3 4 166 37 l o5 3 7 16 7 30 167 33 PRECINCT 1 07 323 183 29 177 3 7 173 37 172. 4 0 180 30 177 30 PRf:CINCT 108 498 277 37 280 40 263 42 2!6 60 2.6 7 40 L6& 43 PRECINCT 109 399 243 1 9 229 3 1 230 26 2 18 34 229 25 231 2 1 PRE: CI NCT 110 355 19C 4 0 188 4 9 186 4 5 184 50 187 45 184 48 PRE:C IN CT 111 207 112 32 1 04 3 7 109 34 103 40 105 38 1 07 3 4 PRECINCT 112 433 22~ 50 229 50 22 51 2 19 56 218 5 1 2.8 45 PREC INCT 113 285 169 19 l 61 26 159 22 156 27 166 20 162 19 TOTAL SUP DIST 2 : 0864 2158 l 0654 12422 1 0037 ~165 l )492 l b796 12303 l JJ4d ~ -,10 l )574 2228 - -- - STATEMENT u~ All VO TES CAST Al THE GE:NERAL El lCTlUN NUVEMdlR 3, 19 70 P AC,t: 2. 7 COUKT Or AP PE: Al - SE:CONO 01S1RICT 0 1v . l - JLDGl u 1v. 2 PRE:S .JUO . I JUD Gt Ol V. 3 - J lJOut: T G G L l T T R R c. c. A A 0 u u l l H H c G (. (., L L T s s l L c 0 T T "' "' L l A T T l l , M H H p p p p l A A l I "' p T T lJ 0 F F E l s s c 0 K R v s s ( c " N T T 0 0 0 " t\ T N N E c A y y y y y y s E N E N E N E N E: N E N T s 0 s 0 s c s 0 s 0 s 0 PRECINCT 114 257 14~ 2 9 146 2 8 134 35 141 30 140 2.9 141 28 PR ECINCT 115 410 211 2 8 2 14 24 208 31 188 50 207 33 l.08 3 0 PR EC INCT 116 304 151 2.9 15 1 27 14 5 25 142 2 ti 145 l.6 145 26 - PRECINCT 117 3 83 22t 36 232 4 0 225 43 2 13 5 6 2. .2 8 36 231 36 PRECINCT 118 4 03 2 4 :i 29 25( 2S 239 30 225 49 25 1 21 248 2 7 PRE CINCT 119 289 l 5t 17 l 5E l o 1 54 18 146 2 7 153 l! 1 57 14 PRlCI NCT 1 2.0 33~ 19 l 28 192 3 3 l &O 41 1 80 39 190 2 7 1 9L 2 5 PRECINCT 1 2 1 213 l Ot 43 9~ 4 9 9o 46 96 4 8 104 4 0 104 44 PRE CI NCT 122 157 7( 22 71 22 68 20 t9 2 3 0 8 19 b6 23 PRtCINCT 123 432 2 1~ 5 ~ 2 ()t 5 1 2. 14 47 2 12 50 209 S3 2 18 4 6 PRt CINCT 124 447 2 4~ 5 7 252 58 243 62 2 42 60 2.44 57 244 55 PRECINCT 12 5 382 l ~~ 42 205 41 198 43 194 42 19 7 41 199 3S PREC I NCT 126 3 78 2 4 ~ 2 ~ 23~ 30 239 2 7 2.:SO 40 235 29 234 31 PREC INCf 127 445 2S l 47 2~( 4 9 2 4 9 4 5 229 63 250 38 2 49 4 2 ,_ PRE ClNCT 128 458 26" 46 264 4 8 259 5 1 254 5 5 2So S l 2Sb 49 PRE CINCT 1 29 4 81 28~ 53 283 60 2 72 63 2 10 6 7 281 ~3 2. 79 53 PRE CI NCT 130 3 7" 20~ 47 20~ 5 4 201 52 201 57 2.03 52 2.03 52 PR EC I NCT 1 31 41~ 2 4 ~ 4 9 2 4 ( 57 2 45 49 241 53 241 51 250 4 6 PRECl NCT 132 3 72 L 2.: 50 2 12 52 2 1.5 S l 208 58 2 10 53 2. 15 4 6 PRE CINCT 133 478 2 l C 46 2 18 S l 190 58 193 70 199 44 199 4 6 PREC INCT 134 383 220 39 220 4 0 209 43 208 48 2 10 43 2 11 4 2 PRECINCT 135 396 25 ~ 46 2S5 4 8 2.S4 4 8 244 55 2 4 6 5 1 247 4 9 PRECINCT 136 3 51 19 1 3S 1 86 3 9 173 47 179 42 l d6 3 1 184 36 PREC.INCT 13 7 303 1 5~ 48 1 61 4 6 162 44 167 39 156 4 6 159 44 PRECINCT 138 S29 3 0( 6 1 307 S6 292 61 285 68 291 6 1 300 S6 PRt CINCT 139 356 2 0~ 53 208 S 7 209 S l 203 57 Lll .5 l 2 10 5G PRE CINCT 140 290 16 .li 39 1 !' J 4 4 1?3 48 153 49 l t l 39 106 36 PRE:CI NCT 141 329 1 61 49 l 7t 5 1 169 47 166 ?2 172 44 170 4t tj PREC INCT 142 405 2 2~ 44 2 14 S3 2 13 50 204 S7 2. 11 52 2C. 7 S7 PRE CINt.T 143 322 211 30 1 9.li 38 l d6 42 195 37 LOO 34 199 3 1 PRE CINCT 144 332 1 9 ~ 4 0 19C 45 l d'J 39 189 44 193 3d 1S2 39 PRtCINCT 145 339 2 01 54 195 56 192 S5 193 56 198 50 201 47 PRf:C INCT 146 294 15 c:; 3 1 l 6t 38 159 38 1.52 42 1 ~9 36 156 38 PREC INCT 147 413 2 4 ( .53 2 41 4 8 229 58 230 58 L33 !' l 240 49 PREC INCT 148 435 244 63 23E 68 2.4 0 62 239 63 241 6 1 238 o4 PREC I NCT 149 358 21] 47 2. 03 50 l 9a .54 201 56 201 ~o 201 so PRf:C INCT 150 418 2 1~ 5 7 20~ 66 208 o l 208 6 1 2 17 S3 2 14 56 PKE CI NCT 1 51 372 173 .5 7 l 73 65 177 S9 174 ~9 1/7 !4 l7C 60 PR EC. INCT 152 315 131 43 13( 41 123 so 130 38 1 31 40 128 41 PRECINCT 153 400 1 5.2 69 14 ~ 69 144 72 144 74 147 69 145 75 PRECI NCT 1 54 312 1 0 ~ 62 11.G 58 1 03 64 10 6 bO 110 63 104 62. PREC INCT l SS 246 9 ~ 57 94 56 89 59 88 58 8 7 60 87 6C PRl:CINCT 1 56 331 14~ 55 143 59 138 63 141 6 1 142 S8 1 3 7 66 PRECINCT 1 S7 376 llt 83 1 2 9 70 117 77 117 76 118 73 116 76 PK ECINCT l S8 2 74 1 0~ 52 1 03 53 1 01 S3 99 5S 94 ~ 8 ,5 S7 PRE CINCT 159 419 2 2 ~ 51 22t 51 220 53 2. 26 51 22.6 48 2L5 51 PR EC INCT 1 60 414 2S.! 62 2 42 72 237 73 239 76 2SO 66 2 4 5 6c PRE CI NCT 16 1 317 i s ~ 4 3 1 5 36 148 44 148 45 1 51 4 2 147 4 2 PREC I NCT 162 4S9 25~ 69 2 4 t 71 2SO 69 2 46 13 24J 74 245 69 PRE CINCT 163 313 1 8~ 51 183 51 182 54 l t9 60 182 52 176 54 - PREC INCT 1 64 3 6 4 l 9i 74 192 77 1 94 76 196 74 19S 74 194 76 PRECINCT 165 188 l Oi 2S l o~ 25 104 21 92 39 103 26 105 26 PREC INCT 166 188 8: 22 1 : 20 73 2 1 79 22 7o 2.2 7 5 22 - PRE CI NCT l o 7 4 6~ 23( 62 22 7 6 6 220 6 4 225 06 221 63 2 13 6S PRE: CINCT 168 338 18 .(: 40 l 7 ~ 3 7 179 37 173 4 d l &O 36 182 36 PRE CINCT 169 333 16( 42 1 81 32 1 61 38 160 3 7 159 31 1 64 3 Lt PREC INCT 170 374 19 i 2 6 1 9~ 2 7 192 26 196 20 193 24 1 54 25 PRECINCT 171 310 1 3 ~ 2.5 1 3~ 3 2 128 29 135 25 134 2 1 134 24 PRECINCT 17 2 2 56 132 16 130 17 122 16 12S l o 125 17 120 19 TOTAL SUP DIST 3 -' 1027 12659 l 1119 2809 l ) 700 l 642 l )936 l 11 73 t. 743 l 0811 ~988 l )947 l66l - " -----------,---~-- ------------------------------------------------, 5TATt:MENT OF ALL VOTES CAST AT THE: GE~E~AL t:LECTION NUVtMulR 3 , 19 10 tAG E: lb COURT OF APPEAL - ~E:CONU DISTRICT DI V. l - JUOC,E DIV . 2 PRES . J UL . I J UulJE: DlV . 3 - J l.JUGt: T G G L l T T R R c c A A 0 u u I I H H c c c (J L L T s s l L ( 0 T T t-' tJ. l L A T T l L tJ M H H p p p p L A A l I p p T T L 0 f F E: E s s L 0 K R I/ s s c G t N T T 0 0 0 f\ N T N N E c A y y y y y y s E N t: N E N E: N E N E: N T s 0 s 0 s (, s 0 s 0 s 0 PREC.lNCT 173 280 125 31 1 21 34 123 30 1 21 29 119 30 118 3 1 PRECINCT 174 27 8 144 36 136 43 1 34 43 142 40 138 39 133 46 PR EC INCT 175 314 14~ 43 1 3 1 5 1 1 31 52 133 S l 133 48 139 43 PREC INCT 176 3 4 8 192 80 l 73 96 184 88 1 81 84 183 82 176 90 PX.E CINCT 177 295 1 5~ 53 150 56 138 o3 141 64 147 !4 147 58 PREC.lNCT 178 280 140 64 121 79 132 6 7 1 27 72 l 2d 7 1 120 7'i PR EC INCT 179 325 14t 58 1 51 60 142 6 1 139 61 146 58 146 56 PR EC INCT 180 312 15 ~ 35 143 45 150 40 137 53 148 41 144 38 PREC I NCT 1 8 1 404 220 48 llb ~5 08 58 206 60 l ll 54 209 56 PR f:C l NCT 182 246 1 3 ~ 39 125 52 129 4~ lLo 47 1 34 40 13 1 43 PREC INCT 183 408 22~ 79 224 84 224 80 215 89 2.2 1 84 218 &7 PKf:CINCT 184 263 15 ~ 44 l4b 53 158 43 146 49 162 44 148 46 PREC INCT 185 300 16( 62 154 63 159 5 1 155 bl. 15" 55 156 62 P~ EC INCT 186 278 l4t 53 141 65 1 34 64 140 6 1 138 63 1 3 7 61 PREC INCT 187 223 11( 4q 114 42 107 48 114 4o 112 47 111 45 PRE:CINCT 188 232 121 36 111 43 116 38 117 3 1 11 41 120 35 PREC INCT 189 330 171 74 160 83 164 78 1 6 7 11 17l o9 108 71 PRECINCT 190 195 9E 24 90 28 94 25 89 28 90 29 dt3 28 PRlCINCT l CJ 1 241 12~ 3 1 125 32 121 30 122 3 1 126 25 117 33 P~ EC INCT 192 314 19~ 55 1 79 75 186 63 185 6 1 189 62 176 73 PRECINCT 193 267 125 51 119 55 121 58 120 55 126 54 123 56 PRECINCT 194 239 12 ':i 33 126 42 1 3 1 34 lll 41 1 37 30 1 23 40 PRE:C INC.T 195 204 9 4 52 90 56 94 ~2 92 55 92 52 9L 53 Pt{E CINCT 196 75 32 11 32 12 32 1 2 33 10 3 1 ll 31 12 PRECINCT 197 252 14 62 149 64 1 54 5 7 144 60 l l 59 147 64 PRE:CINCT 198 240 137 52 129 5 7 131 54 133 53 1 29 54 1 20 63 PRECINCT 1 9~ 235 121 33 111 36 113 33 114 40 111 33 l C9 39 PKl:CINCf 200 425 241 77 243 72 42 72 236 80 1. 42 6d 24 1 65 PRECINCT 201 358 221 49 208 60 208 57 201 6 7 219 48 213 5 1 PRECINCT 202 290 171 40 l7C 46 177 41 167 5 1 176 40 177 42 PRECINCT 203 212 133 30 1 31 32 122 36 1L6 35 133 3 1 1L5 31 PRECINC.T 204 249 l Sf 46 146 5 4 1 54 48 149 49 1~5 43 151 45 PREC INCT 205 123 81 14 91 12 85 16 85 17 9 1 12 87 15 PRt:CINCT 206 157 6S l'il 71 18 b1 17 bb 24 70 lo 6 7 20 . TOTAL SUP DI ST 4 9198 l 5b3 !t729 l6b0 1-691 !:d8 :i7u8 r.931 .755 +765 1. 745 +d34 . 6d3 PRE:CINCT 207 PREC INCT 208 PREC INCT 209 PRECINCT 210 PRtCINCT 21 1 PRECINCT 212. PRECINCT 213 PRECINC.T 214 PRECINCT 215 PRECINLT 216 PRECINCT 21 7 PRECINCT 218 PRE:CINCT 219 PRE:.INCT 220 PRECINCT 221 PRECINCT 222 PKE:CINCT 223 PRECINCT 224 PRE:CINCT 225 PRf:CINCT 226 PRt:CINCT 227 PRE:C INCT 228 PRECINCT 229 PRECINCT 230 PKECINCT 231 PRECINCT 232 PRECINCT 233 PRECINCT 234 PRECINCT 235 PRECINCT 236 PRE:ClNCT 237 PRECINCT 238 PRECINCT 239 PRECINCT 240 PRECINCT 241 PRECINCT 242 PRECINCT 243 PRl:CINCT 244 PRECINCT 245 PRE:CINCT 246 PRlCINCT 247 PRECINCT 248 PRECINCT 249 PRtCINCT 250 PRECINCT 251 PRECINCT 252 PRECINCT 253 PRECINCT 254 PRECINCT 255 PRECINCT 256 - Plt:CINCT 257 PRECINCT 258 PRE:CINCT 2.59 PRECINCT 260 PRECINCT 261 PRECINCT 262 PRECINCT 263 PRECINCT 2o4 PRECINCT 265 PRECINCT 266 PRECINCT 267 TOTAL SUP DIST 5 STATtMENT OF ALL VGTE:S CAST AT THE GENERAL EltCTIUN NUVE:M~~R 3 , COURT OF DIV . T 0 T A l v 0 T E c A s T 388 270 252 276 278 258 276 464 304 315 245 300 264 378 366 231 277 296 233 245 314 342 285 244 252 238 284 207 258 258 253 341 334 198 97 252 113 29 417 219 381 353 313 318 455 418 502 253 343 30.t; 141 64 252 299 323 255 190 326 260 287 78 G u s T A F 5 0 N y E s 216 141 l Oi 142 156 1 3~ 152 231 142 141 12~ 131 121 18( 20~ 122 1 3 1 152 110 134 163 189 139 115 125 107 145 8-4 117 144 119 190 152 15 49 13 'j 4.2 9 203 11-4 2 l t 188 161 173 243 23t 28~ 127 l 9L l6C 59 3~ 13~ 132 l 7~ 117 71 15 'j 13( 154 3~ l - G u s T A F s 0 N N 0 68 46 46 49 47 3 1 41 56 34 22 24 42 37 45 39 29 30 27 45 32 63 48 38 26 37 36 31 36 411 34 39 48 58 29 14 47 12 5 66 39 57 47 74 50 78 70 65 52 45 56 13 9 35 31 72 26 31 44 36 37 13 10966 12492 !3575 APPE:A L - 5t((Jl'c[) J l.JDGE: L I l l l E y E s 207 140 103 130 143 129 152 2.2~ 143 138 123 132. 122. 179 20' 12 .t; 12.5 154 105 125 148 170 135 109 118 100 139 80 117 133 104 182 15( 7C 50 138 37 9 19~ 112 212 175 158 163 232 22.t; 2 7 l;j 125 181 148 61 32 123 125 173 11 ( b~ 139 12.2 137 33 l I l l I E N 0 75 46 56 65 59 35 41 63 32 35 26 41 40 47 37 .28 33 26 SC 39 7& 67 44 32 44 37 35 37 46 45 54 54 68 38 11 49 14 5 72 38 61 6 1 78 51 91 82. 15 56 52 61 14 9 40 40 /4 30 30 59 47 49 13 8224 12815 . OISTRICT T H c ~ p 5 0 I\ y E s 206 142 114 lJS 1~2 128 154 233 139 142 12.3 137 122 177 190 119 131 147 119 127 158 192 141 120 140 107 140 81 106 133 114 178 149 74 49 140 36 8 189 111 219 167 154 114 229 23~ 271 122 180 144 63 28 129 131 1 71 115 73 141 132 145 38 T H 0 M p s 0 f\ ~ 0 68 39 49 54 ~l 33 40 53 32 27 23 37 33 48 46 30 29 25 39 38 o9 46 41 25 27 33 37 32 52. 41 46 57 65 29 16 42 14 5 71 36 55 58 80 49 83 13 72 58 51 65 10 16 35 36 12 25 27 51 32 41 10 12577 8364 OIV . 2 PRE:S .JUO . I JUCGI: R c T H y E s 209 142 106 136 145 128 148 236 134 1.39 1.27 132 119 171 185 116 125 140 114 135 161 184 137 118 126 101 139 d~ 111 134 113 174 151 74 49 141 J3 8 189 11.:S 216 170 159 168 230 2.34 273 123 183 149 54 32 128 127 166 117 6d 146 129 138 33 R t T H N 0 1 2 49 47 53 62 36 41 5 1 37 30 2.1 43 42 51 52 29 37 36 41 36 67 48 41 21 33 35 3o 30 5 1 41 47 57 60 30 14 44 20 5 75 39 57 59 75 54 89 74 74 58 ~2 61 21 8 35 41 76 22 30 so 36 41 15 B275 ~706 c c M p T (. I\ y E: s 2.14 143 10 5 141 158 124 151 232. 135 139 121 lJO 120 177 196 11~ 127 140 121 1L7 158 201 131 113 1.:30 109 146 90 115 137 107 179 147 69 45 144 35 9 187 113 22. l 17 164 167 2.32 230 2dl 127 183 152 58 32 126 12tl 172 112 10 135 12.2 143 34 c Li M p T 0 N N 0 69 44 SL 49 47 3b 42 55 35 33 23 39 34 39 41 30 35 22 40 44 6d 41 44 30 31 29 28 30 43 _j() 50 53 60 j4 17 39 15 ~ 69 37 52 54 72 46 88 13 63 53 4 ti 60 16 9 37 38 71 24 28 56 42 39 12 ~!:55 3352 1970 LIV. A L L p u H T y E s 211 lit 7 104 137 148 129 150 226 138 138 llb 132 117 168 196 114 lL4 145 113 1L5 154 178 134 113 130 19 140 86 107 137 111 177 l.45 68 52 143 38 7 192 lCb 216 175 155 167 234 235 271 117 l bl 143 61 32 129 121 167 115 69 151 123 136 33 3 - A l l p 0 R T N (J 66 40 47 5 1 53 32 42 57 31 30 2S 4C 36 49 42 3C 36 26 4L 39 6S 53 41 28 34 38 _.:j L 31 53 37 4c 57 61 35 11 42 16 6 67 39 58 55 15 44 85 73 68 5; 4 o4 13 s 32 44 7f; 21 31 45 43 46 13 :J~30 2621 PAGE: 29 JUO~t STATEMEN l Of All VOTE:S CAST Af THt GtNERAL l: LLC TIUN NOVtMBEK 3, 197C PAGI: JC CUURT UF APPEAL - SECLNU OISTR ! CT DIV . l - J UOC,E DIV . 2. PRE:~ . JUC . I JU~GI: DI V. 3 - JUDGI: T ~ G L L T T I{ R c (. A A 0 u u I I H H c c c G L L T s s L L c 0 T T M H L L A T T L l t'. ~ Ii H p p p p l A A 1 I p p T T (J 0 F F E: E s s c 0 R R v s s G c t'C N T T 0 0 0 t\ t\ T N N E ~ I A y y y y y y s E N E N E t\ c N E N E: N T s 0 s 0 s c. s 0 s 0 s u TOTAL SUP Dl ST l ) 5223 1479 82 71 1684 7660 L4 07 dll9 8308 1537 7933 ~055 3186 145 1 TOTAL SUP DI ST 2 ~ 0864 2 158 l 065Li 2422 l )037 ~ 1 65 l )492 l 079 2303 1 0348 ~770 l )574 ~228 TOTAL SUP DIST 3 , 1027 2659 l 111;1 ~809 1 i)700 ~642 l )936 ~ l 117 ~ ~743 1 0811 29d8 l )947 ~661 TOTAL SUP DI ST 4 9 198 l5o3 472': 1660 t.691 . 588 4708 14 931 1755 4765 1745 't 834 1683 TOTAL SUP DIST 5 .l 6966 2 492 8224 12577 62 75 ~555 3.230 8575 ~815 6364 2700 6352 2621 SUB TOTALS ~ 327 8 l 0351 ' l29Si l 1152 4 1363 1 ).157 4 2485 4 3 7 6.:S 1 11 53 4 ~22 1 l ~264 4 ~893 l )644 ABSENTEE TOTALS 3747 264 191( 3 11 1802 295 18 18 1 9 15 323 1833 344 . 83o 293 GRAND TOTALS ~ 7025 l 0635 ~ 4907 1 l4b3 4 3165 l )652 4 4303 4 569f l 1476 4 i- 054 1 2o08 4 t729 1 0937 ' . STATEMENT OF ALL V UTt:~ CA~ T AT THt Gt NERAL El tCTlON NOVtM~EH j ' 1 ~ 1 0 PAGt 31 CUURT Ur APPtA L - SECOND Ul STRI CT ( CUNl.) DIV. 3 J UD~c CC.ON T.) DI V. 4 PRES.JUD . I J UDGt: OJ\1.5 PRt:S .JUD . I J UGGE T c c s s F F c D K K A A 0 0 0 c c I l u u A A I I T B 8 H H l l I\ , u u s s A E E w w E E " r-. ~ s L 0 L y y t E s s I I v T T 0 z z T t: E E R R c A y y y y y y s E N t: N E N E N E N E N T s 0 s 0 s G s 0 s 0 s 0 P RECINCT 001 297 1 57 42 160 38 162 .36 l o3 30 159 35 1 6 1 35 PRECINCT 002 325 177 4 5 1 8':1 35 183 3 1 182 35 16 7 49 174 44 PRECINCT 003 292 149 43 1 53 39 152 38 143 4 3 140 50 138 4 5 PRECINCT 004 371 172 46 170 43 167 44 170 39 165 44 160 't3 PRE:CINCT 005 l. 51 12 1 29 1 24 30 130 23 122 29 llo 33 1 25 2S PK EC INCT 006 334 143 41 136 4 6 148 37 145 34 135 4 3 132 44 PRECINCT 007 254 12 4 3S 129 32 l j 5 2 7 1 27 28 119 42 14'8 29 PRECINCT 008 336 173 38 1 80 30 179 30 174 29 169 3 1 170 33 PRt:CINCT 009 250 1 2~ 52 1 4 1 31 143 26 142 2 7 1L2 4 8 126 43 Pk ECINCT 0 10 425 20~ 69 2 15 59 217 62 2 1L 6 1 200 73 208 65 Pt.EC INCT 0 11 403 20~ 47 2 l d 32 2 18 29 223 .jo 200 ~o 205 39 PRt:CINCT 0 12 386 1 6~ 6 7 1 9 1 3 4 191 3 1 1 87 33 154 71 173 3; PREC I NCT 0 13 296 1 5 1 55 185 23 l dO 24 183 20 14? 59 1 64 3 1 PRECINCT 014 27 2 1 2 .! 4 0 142 2 1 1 42 18 141 16 117 3 7 1 27 33 PREC INCT 0 15 422 1 8~ 87 237 3S 226 41 221 37 185 84 20& 4 9 PRECI NCT 0 16 369 l 7~ 10 203 4 0 203 37 200 35 172 69 187 5C PRECINCT 0 17 280 14C 4 8 1 6~ 1 9 170 l o 105 20 135 50 1 5 7 26 PRECINCT 0 18 385 176 52 203 25 202 26 201 28 179 52 19 1 35 PRE CINCT 0 19 4 63 2 1 ( 63 230 43 234 4 0 234 38 2 19 5 7 223 4c PRtCINCT 020 473 252 64 274 4 5 Lo5 48 263 5 1 244 b1 247 62 PRECINCT 021 340 1 8 (: 4 5 200 3 4 1 93 3 4 19 5 28 177 44 183 4 0 PR EC INCT 022 311 15 5 42 1 64 32 159 33 157 35 148 44 158 35 PRECINCT 023 4 08 2 0 1 4 8 2 1 0 38 2 17 34 2 11 36 19'J 46 198 43 PRECINCT 024 406 205 58 2 18 4 0 2 15 37 2 1 2 39 19 l 64 202 47 PRECINCT 025 72 35 17 44 7 46 6 4 5 7 36 16 4 3 & PRl:CI NCT 026 108 4 3 24 51 16 ~3 13 5 1 13 45 22 5 1 14 PREC I NCT 027 3 6 2 1 9 .ii C4 2 15 4 C 2 18 36 2 11 38 185 64 199 4 c, PREC I NCT 028 357 19( 52 206 33 205 3 0 L03 2 7 185 47 l j l 41 P RE CINCT 029 372 166 4 6 174 4 1 170 4 0 164 43 171 41 160 42 PRECINCT 030 3 10 15 1 36 163 25 164 3 1 160 29 1 54 34 1 57 27 PREC INCT 031 388 2 1 5 47 229 36 230 36 230 33 2 14 50 2 19 41 PREC INCT 032 4 38 2 1 ( 58 231 33 230 35 226 3 5 200 63 2 18 44' PKE:CINCT 033 418 2 l c o2 23t 42 235 39 23~ 40 2 1 2 65 221 55 PRE:C I NCT 034 386 171 53 1 91 3 1 192 24 190 L1 161 52 174 4 . PRECINCT 0 .:S 5 302 128 41 1 3(: 32 132 3 1 122 38 110 4 3 119 3 7 PRE:C I NCT 036 3 54 1 8 ~ 33 1 87 2 7 l d8 25 189 25 180 33 17C 34 PREC I NCT 037 393 173 60 200 39 1 97 36 189 39 168 66 175 50 PRE CINCT 038 335 13E 6C 149 4 8 149 44 142 4 4 l 3b 5 4 133 5.3 PREC INCT 039 364 1 8C 4 0 192 28 1 98 2 4 1 9 1 29 179 4 2 172 41 PREC INCT 0 4 0 314 167 39 177 3 1 180 28 178 29 l b l 4 3 170 35 PRECINCT 0 41 419 223 60 259 28 257 2b 253 26 208 12 220 56 PRE:CINCT 0 42 2 12 111 2 1 120 1 3 124 9 119 7 10 4 25 114 14 PRECI NCT 0 4 3 360 162 69 192 32 200 26 190 26 155 6d 186 36 PRl:ClNCT 0 44 307 1 5 6 4 9 169 37 1 67 36 1 57 37 14.Z 52 1 54 4 0 PRtCINCT 0 4 5 291 130 72 l 7 ( 3 3 173 30 170 30 12d 71 1 5 1 4& ' r oT AL SUP DI ST 1 l 5223 l233 813 7 L4 13 "'988 ~2 71 7 556 7421 1 500 ~ 1 39 L423 7 199 179 7 SJATLMENT OF ALL VU T c~ CA~ l AT THE GENtRAL ELEC TI ON NUVtMtltK 3 , 1970 PAGE;: 3L COURT OF APPEA L - St:CONO Ul STRI CT (CONT. ) DIV . 3 J UOGt l CON T. J Olv.4 PRES.JUD . I J UDbE DIV. 5 PRES .JUD . I J UDGE T c c s s F F 0 0 K K A A 0 0 0 c c I l lJ u A A J I T 13 13 H H L L f\ N u u !: s A E E \'\ w E t f\ N s s CJ 0 L y y E E s s I l v T T 0 l l T E E E R R c , A y y y y y y s E N E N E N E N t: N E N T s 0 s 0 s 0 s 0 !: u s 0 PRECINCT 0 46 287 145 39 1 51 36 146 41 1 3 7 4 2 134 46 138 41 PRt: CINCT 047 298 159 3 1 170 l ) 165 22 153 24 150 35 149 28 PRE:CINCT 0 48 207 102 21 106 18 110 14 1 02 19 102 21 106 15 PRE CINCT 0 49 2 70 135 3 1 129 32 132 30 130 28 117 35 120 3 1 PRE C.INCT 050 286 13S 3 5 1 31 34 13d 27 1 34 2 7 128 38 1L6 35 PREC INCT 051 1 92 86 22 84 23 81 23 76 20 81 23 78 23 PREC INCT 052 343 1 6~ 3 7 1 6 t 3 7 1 57 41 1.50 4 2 148 42 140 4 5 PRECINC.T 053 320 14; 4d 1 57 3 7 150 33 149 34 13d 4 5 144 41 PREC INCT 054 267 134: 35 l _j3 35 131 32 l 2 28 12L 38 1.:1 34 PREC INCT 055 178 7 ". 24 7 ". 2 7 12 23 71 25 70 28 68 2 4 PRt:CINCT 056 215 9~ 22 102 17 1 04 15 99 1 ti 89 2d SL 23 PRE CINCT 057 357 172 4 o l 9C 25 191 L4 l d l 26 165 48 l 6S 41 PRE CI NCT OS ti 389 1 84 51 201 4 C 2 10 35 206 31 l d3 55 18 ;- 4c PRE CINCT 059 307 132 32 l 5l 18 154 21 150 2 1 136 33 139 25 PREC INCT 060 2 75 l 3t 3 7 142 3 1 142 25 139 27 1 3 1 36 i 32 32 PRE CINCT Oo l 24 0 1 0 1 31 l l t 19 112 19 110 2 1 96 31 9 7 3 1 PRECI NCT 062 276 11~ 53 1 3~ 33 136 35 139 29 116 50 1 24 39 PRECINCT 063 354 1 5! ':7 16t 3 I 177 38 168 39 148 6~ 162 46 Pf{ t(,lNCT 064 297 11~ 39 l 2t 2 7 128 28 122 29 109 43 118 34 PREC INCT 065 L26 9.i: 39 112 11 1 09 19 108 17 92 36 99 25 PRE CINCT 066 347 l 6 .( 53 1 82 3 4 180 35 177 33 16 4 49 16 4 4 5 PR ECINCT 067 354 l ~~ 4 9 173 3 6 179 30 l o9 36 160 4 9 170 36 PRECINCT 068 364 1 81 53 2 16 20 22j 15 2 19 l o 188 60 2.02 30 PRECINCT 069 277 1 0 ~ 38 123 25 1 23 24 119 2 3 102 4 0 110 3 1 PRECIN CT 0 70 2 55 1 31 39 147 22 150 16 143 17 128 4 0 1~ 9 34 PRECINCT 071 325 126 83 l 82 30 172 29 172 32 12 1 17 140 57 PRE CINCT 0 7 2 282 111 40 1 24 26 123 28 123 28 106 48 115 36 PRt: CINCT 0 73 3 38 141 56 1 5 32 160 L6 15d 23 l LU o l 141 44 PREC I NCT 074 324 162 50 1 8'4 Jl 183 26 176 2o 159 49 16 4 3 1 PRE CINCT 0 15 241 l OE 44 ll E 38 117 36 117 J3 109 44 112 38 Pf{ EC INCT 0 76 257 l l C 4 1 11 t 3 7 117 34 113 33 111 3o 115 34 PRt:CINCT 0 77 30'4 142 3; l ':2 3 1 150 3 1 150 33 1 37 41 147 35 PRtCINCT 0 78 348 155 4 6 166 33 l o5 2 7 160 24 1 5.:S 39 159 33 PRECI NCT 0 79 309 1 3-'I ~o 1 36 4 5 147 41 141 38 129 5 1 13 1 4 5 PRt:CINCT 080 3 38 1 5~ 4 0 l 5E 33 159 3 1 156 30 145 40 14 5 3e PRECI NCT Ob l 21l 101 37 117 29 1 04 31 103 29 96 39 98 38 PRECINCT 082 249 l O; 36 l 01 3 4 110 29 109 2.9 9 7 36 9tl 35 PRE CINCT 083 221 d i 4 3 1 0( 3 1 97 28 100 2 4 77 47 82 36 PREC INCT 084 306 12l 43 12 ~ 3 1 lLO 31 119 29 111 41 110 42 PRECINCT 085 237 102 3 6 1 02 38 102 35 103 32 98 41 100 33 PRECI NCT 086 236 90 47 ~~ 4 3 1 01 42 93 4 2 98 44 93 4 5 PRECINCT 087 2 71 1 2 ~ 38 141 2 4 137 28 132 30 1 24 38 13 1 30 PREC.INCT 086 289 14i 34 146 3 4 145 34 139 3 5 142 33 136 36 PRECI NCT 089 258 13 ~ 41 149 29 144 32 139 31 128 44 1 34 38 PRECINCT 090 288 13( 38 1 3~ 3 0 1 37 35 l_j7 3 3 122 44 129 3 7 PRECINCT 091 302 156 41 1 71 22 172 2 4 1 67 2 1 150 4 1 1 54 3 '4 PRECINCT 092 3 49 182 37 174 4 5 173 4 0 169 40 163 46 166 43 PRt:CI NCT 093 284 123 39 126 33 133 31 128 3 4 117 39 1L4 3 1 PRE:CI NCT 094 405 1 8~ 57 l 8': 54 1 9 1 4 5 186 4 5 l dO 49 176 50 PR EC INCT 095 477 256 85 2 7 5 6 7 286 62 2d3 5 7 252 b7 271 6& PRl: C. I NCT 096 367 18t 63 199 !O 204 4 5 206 46 182 6'7 199 47 PRE CINCT 097 388 2 0-'I 5 ; 2 13 5 1 2 12 50 2 14 46 19 7 64 203 56 PREC INCT 098 284 15 i 30 1 5~ 29 155 29 153 26 149 31 148 32: PRE CINCT 099 294 14 ~ 4 6 1 541 3 7 15& 36 153 4 0 148 44 147 41 PREC INCT 100 3 50 1 76 51 195 35 183 3b l do 33 l o 7 48 177 42 PRECINCT 10 l 350 l 6 i 4 9 1 71 39 176 34 183 28 l b2 50 16 1 4 5 PRE CINCT 102 337 1 5~ 45 l 74 30 172 3 1 168 .:S l 15 7 45 l b3 35 PRECI NCT 103 366 171 6 1 1 9 1 43 195 4 3 195 4 2 172 65 183 50 PRECINCT 1 04 304 1 5~ 4 3 16( 33 1 62 3 1 166 3 1 1 54 40 148 42 PRECINCT 105 3 27 1 6~ 4o 172 44 169 43 174 34 158 53 1 57 53 PRECINCT 106 304 161 4 0 1 6 5 32 107 31 168 30 15 7 41 1 57 37 PRECINCT 1 0 7 ' 323 1 6~ 41 116 33 1 84 33 176 35 171 44 176 37 PRE CINCT 108 498 238 68 259 4 6 27 0 40 262 43 2 4 0 74 .:'. '1 3 59 PRE CINCT 109 399 2 1 5 36 236 17 225 19 224 20 2 10 34 2 19 26 PREC INCT 110 3 55 177 54 185 47 187 40 1 84 41 172 52 177 50 PRE C1 NCT 111 2C7 9 6 43 1 0 7 3 4 1 07 3 5 10 7 3 3 98 40 98 4 2 PRE CINCT 112 433 209 5 7 2 1 8 51 224 4 9 L23 48 207 65 2 12 53 PRECINCT 113 285 150 3L 16C 20 163 19 1 51 24 l ': 5 Ld 150 2e TOTAL ~ U P DI ST 2 ~ 0864 2~ 73 l 054 3 2 145 l )349 ~056 17 81 ~82 4 2250 l U558 2120 ~50o ,603 STATEMENT OF ALL VU TE:S CA5T AT THE GENERAL ELECTION NOVEMBtK 3, 19 7G COURT Of APPE:AL - StCONO OISTKICT ( (,UNT .} DIV . 3 JU D ~ E ICON T.j UIV.4 PRES .JUD . I J ULGE Ol V. 5 PRE:S .JI.Ju . I J UDG E: T c c s s f- F D D K K A A 0 0 0 c (, I I u u A A 1 l T b b H H L L t\ t\ u u s s A E E w w t t: f'\ ~ s s L 0 L y y E E: s s 1 I v l T 0 z l T E: E E R R c A y y y y y y s E N E N E N E N E N t N T s u s 0 s 0 s 0 s u s 0 PRECINCT 114 251 133 36 141 3 1 13 5 .30 133 28 131 35 126 34 PRE:CINCT 115 410 188 53 209 31 2 12 27 20': 28 189 4 9 198 35 PRECINCT 116 304 147 26 1 54 l.4 1.37 28 13 9 26 13b L! 134 26 PRECINCT 117 383 206 60 232 35 228 34 225 3 7 206 60 209 47 PRECINCT 118 40 3 22~ 57 2 53 24 24 5 26 24 5 2 ~ 222 58 .232 3 4 PRECINCT 119 289 14 ~ 29 15L 20 153 16 150 16 138 2 7 1 3 7 28 PRECINCT 120 3 34 16 ~ 4 9 192 28 192 26 19 1 25 169 !O 1 8L 35 PRECINCT 1 21 213 1 0 1 52 106 4S 1 05 44 110 4 0 Y I 53 '18 50 PRECINCT 122 157 6 "i 23 69 2 1 1 2. 20 71 18 70 2 1 72 l c; PRECINCT 1 23 4 32 21~ St 221 S3 223 46 ~2 1 47 2 11 () l 2 14 58 PRECINCl 124 447 24: S !J 2 38 0 2. 238 60 244 4 9 228 68 227 68 PRECINCT 125 3 8 2 1 9 1 42 193 4 0 193 3 7 l Bt 4 2 l 8L 4 4 178 4 6 PRtCINCT 126 37 8 2 2 L 4 5 2 4 2 26 L36 28 2.31 28 222 43 230 34 PRECINCT 1 27 445 23L 60 2 4.li 4 8 243 4 2 l.39 44 2 11 71 220 S7 PRt:CINCT 128 4 58 247 61 254 5 7 254 ?3 253 52 235 66 2 4t 56 PRECINCT 129 4 81 26 ~ 7 0 2 78 58 2 75 55 2 1 2. 56 2. ': ' 13 .263 6 1 P~ECINCT 130 3 74 2 02 56 203 52 214 4 6 203 so 2.00 60 196 55 PRECINCT 1 3 1 414 238 55 2 42 S3 2 45 49 2 40 50 24 l 54 233 5 6 PRECINCT 132 372 20~ 59 2 03 57 214 4H 2 1L 46 195 62 LO l ?l PRECINCT 133 478 175 78 198 46 1 91 S7 200 4 3 170 82 185 5 7 PREClNCT 13 4 383 2 0 6 50 20Y 4 5 2 13 39 2 10 31 19 5 ~5 203 4S PRECINCT 13S 396 24 0 61 2 52. 4 6 2 58 44 255 46 L40 bl 246 5S PRECINCT 1 36 351 175 47 1 84 36 100 36 173 4 0 170 41 163 Sl PRt:CINCT 1 3 7 3 03 161 44 l S8 4 6 1 ~9 44 162 39 160 43 152 48 PRECINCT 138 5 29 283 7 5 302 59 293 57 29 1 50 26~ d3 279 6S PRECINCT 139 356 210 S3 208 53 L09 so 205 50 201 57 20L S5 PRECINCT 140 290 141: 5 4 1 64 41 170 3 7 1 6 4 39 149 ?3 l ~ l SC PRECINCT 141 329 1 6~ 47 1 67 4 d 162 54 168 49 lJ8 Sb 160 S4 PRE:C1NCT 142 4 05 20~ 62 2 18 4 9 2 12 4 9 2.06 50 2.02 ?t .0 3 56 PRECINCT 143 3 22 1 8 4 4 5 192 38 196 30 l ti9 3 4 180 4 3 176 4 3 PR ECINCT 144 332 l e i 44 195 3 9 1 97 33 190 3 4 18 1 4 4 188 36 PRE:CINCT 145 339 190 52 l 9C 56 1 87 55 19 7 50 186 56 185 54 PRECINCT 146 2 94 15 ~ 42 l SS 3 7 156 3 7 1S6 35 15 1 40 15L 3S PRECINCT 147 413 232 53 235 ':J 229 50 l.29 4 9 2 16 63 2. 18 59 PRE:CINCT 148 4 3 5 229 71 l. 34 65 231 59 233 61 l. 19 73 2 17 6 7 PRECINCT 149 358 19 .11 5 7 200 52 206 46 199 47 200 55 19 7 SC PRECINCT 150 418 2 O.li 66 2 11 63 214 55 20~ 6 1 196 68 204 6 1 PRECINC.T 1 51 372 168 63 173 60 174 52 165 58 1 55 63 159 oC PRE:CINCT 1 52 3 15 125 43 126 44 129 4 3 ll.7 43 12.5 46 126 46 PRECINCT 1S3 4 00 140 71 145 72 142 73 1 3 4 77 140 71 136 7 5 PRECINCT 1 54 312 1 09 59 l 02 66 102 64 10 7 6 0 102. 63 107 SS PRECINCT 155 246 93 54 89 56 87 SS d8 5 7 b2 02 b4 6 1 PRE:CINCT 1 56 331 143 59 139 64 138 57 139 S7 135 59 132 6 2 PRE:ClNCT 1 57 376 112 80 117 74 115 74 114 7 5 112 7o 110 79 PRECIN CT 1 58 274 9 7 ': 5 97 55 95 57 96 55 9S 5 7 95 55 PRECINCT 1 59 419 220 55 229 4 8 223 4Y 224 49 2 1 2 55 2 14 55 PRECINCT 160 414 2 42 69 2 44 69 2 43 65 2 40 70 227 77 234 70 PRE:C.INCT 1 61 317 141 47 l SO 39 l SL :S8 152 38 141 43 141 45 PRECI NCT 162 459 2 4.t: 73 2 43 75 250 65 244 70 24 2 74 239 70 PREC INCT 163 313 177 58 1 8 1 S3 177 54 1 84 4o 16 1 69 16tJ 63 PR:CINCT 164 364 1 9~ 73 193 76 198 69 19 5 6 7 190 71 189 7~ PRECINCT 165 188 9t 35 l 00 2 7 96 2 7 96 26 8? 3 7 85 32 PRE CINCT 1 66 188 6 ~ 30 7S 23 79 19 7 5 19 10 25 70 28 PRECINCT 167 4 64 2 17 65 2 18 66 22. l 6 0 2 12 62 204 () 7 2cc; 63 PRE:CI NCT 168 338 178 41 1 81 39 179 4 0 183 37 171 47 17d 42 PRE CINCT 169 333 163 39 166 3 ; 159 38 1 6 1 32 159 39 159 37 PRECINCT 170 374 193 25 1 97 22. 198 21 189 l.L 19 1 2 1 l Bc 27 PR ECINCT 171 3 10 133 . Lt 131 2 6 133 20 12 7 22 128 i3 l~l 26 PRECINCT 172 2S6 11 CJ 20 1 2 7 17 12 7 16 116 18 118 17 llc 17 TOTAL SUP DI ST 3 L 1027 30'11 l IJ92? 12606 l ) 776 il80 l )335 1 b S4 5 12 74 7 1 0900 ~5 7 9 l J226 o 93 5 STATEMENT OF ALL VO TtS CAS T AT THI: GtNt:RAL ELECTION NOVEMBtR 3 , 19 70 PAGI:. 34 CuUKT Ur APPl:AL - SECCND DI S TRI CT {CU1 T.) DIV . 3 J UDGE ( C.uN T. ) DI V.4 PRES.JUD . I J UDGE CIV . 5 PKES .JUO . I J l.J D{,E T c c s s F F D 0 K K A A 0 0 0 c c I I u u A A l l T 8 B H H L L (\ N u u s s A E E: ~ w E E (\ r._ ! s u 0 L y y c E s s l I v T T 0 l z T E E E R R c A y y y y y y s E: N E: N E: (\; E N t N E N T s 0 s 0 s c s c s 0 s 0 PREC INCT 173 280 122 29 116 30 120 29 11~ 2.1 118 j) 113 3 1 PRECINCT 174 27 8 139 4 0 137 44 141 35 1 37 3b 135 3o 129 42 PRl: CINCT 175 314 130 52 132 4 8 1 37 44 136 41 128 47 130 47 PRE CINCT 176 3 48 1 84 86 l 86 80 1 85 8 1 185 83 177 8 7 175 90 PRl:CINCT 177 295 141 62 146 54 1 51 54 1 54 4 9 138 6 7 138 64 PRECINCT 178 280 121 76 123 77 1.:)0 70 133 65 123 74 125 74 PRECINCT 179 325 143 58 l 5.: 55 141 57 143 55 139 58 1 37 51 PR ECINCT 180 312 141 4 9 146 39 149 36 1 34 41 1 3 1 50 133 4 2 PRECINCT 1 8 1 4 04 20':7 58 2 11 56 207 52 2 13 4 8 198 6 1 206 53 PRECINCT 182 2 46 13i 42 135 4 0 133 42 l .:So 37 12Y 44 1 2 7 44 PRECINCT 183 408 2 1 ~ 88 2 16 85 223 8 1 227 78 2 10 90 2 18 82 PRECINCT 184 263 152 4 6 155 4 5 15 1 45 146 46 14? 47 1 3 7 54 PKEC INCT 185 300 16 1 55 159 57 1 54 63 156 oO 150 65 1 54 62 PRECINCT 186 27 6 1 3 1 o3 135 66 143 58 143 54 13 4 6 4 1 3 1 be PRECINCT 1 87 223 1 0 4 52 111 4 9 113 42 111 44 108 4Y 102 4 6 PRECINCT 188 232 1 0 ~ 41 111 41 111 40 113 38 111 .j ti l Ob 36 P RECINCT 189 330 1 5! 83 1 6! 71 165 69 159 75 154 78 147 8 1 P Rt.CINCT 190 195 94 25 8t 29 88 28 88 28 8 7 29 8 1 3C PRE:CINCT 1 9 1 241 12 1 3 1 1 24 .:S2 117 29 1 24 26 llL ,j 7 108 3 7 PRt:CINCT 192 31411 182 6 411 1 87 64 182 58 179 66 178 63 173 6 7 PRtCINCT 193 267 120 56 122 55 125 54 120 56 113 65 115 63 PR ECINCT 1 94 23) 130 35 128 3 5 1 23 35 123 36 116 45 112 43 PRECINCT 195 204 90 54 9 1 53 90 5 1 9 1 4 8 84 55 87 53 PRECINCT 196 75 35 9 33 1 0 30 12 3 1 12 30 13 30 12 PRt:C INCT 1 9 7 252 1 5( 60 150 6 1 149 55 146 59 142 6 1 143 61 PRl:CINCT 198 246 1 2 ~ 59 1 2 1 6 0 132 5 l 134 4 7 121 59 119 5 c, PRl:C INCT 199 235 llC 3 7 lll 3 7 114 34 l Co 41 108 42 lil 37 PRE: CINCT 200 425 229 79 241 74 241 74 2 4 2 68 226 89 235 76 PRECINCT 201 358 1 9~ 70 2 17 5 1 2 16 52 2 18 47 194 69 2 10 54 PKEC INCT 202 290 l 6 t: 50 l 7 ~ 4 3 179 38 172 42 16 4 5 1 170 4 2 PRE CINCT 203 2 12 1 21 39 129 32 132 33 133 29 12 1 41 1L3 39 P REC I NCT 204 2 49 14 ~ 54 153 4 5 152 48 152 4 5 140 58 143 55 PRtC INCT 205 123 8 14 82 1 9 89 13 89 13 89 12 86 16 PRECI NCT 206 1 57 7 ( 20 71 17 o9 17 64 22 b5 24 66 18 . TOTAL SUP DI ST 4 9 198 1 736 tt.7 57 1580 4- 7?7 801 't 522 +6 75 1660 ct 782 L5b2 +5 l t 173 7 " STATEMENT OF ALL VO TES CAS T AT THt GtNtRAL E: LE:CTlON NOVEMdt:R 3 , 19 7G PAGE 35 COURT OF APPtA L - SE:CONO U! STRI CT ( CuNl .) DIV. 3 J UOvE: (CGN T.) OIV.4 PRE:S .JUO . I J UDGE l l v. 5 Pk t:S . J lJL . I J lJLGt T c c s s f- F 0 D K K A A 0 0 0 c (. I I u u A A l I T B B H H L L f\ ~ u u s s A E E w \ii E E f\ N ~ s 0 lJ L y y E E s s l I v T T 0 z l T E E: E R R c A y y y y y y s E N E: N E N E N E: N E N T s 0 s 0 s c s 0 s l; s 0 PRE:CI NCT 207 388 20: 74 2 13 69 209 67 208 71 2.04 72 20 l 7c PRt:C INCT 208 270 1 3~ 52 1 3~ 49 149 42 145 46 142 4o 140 4 9 PRE CINCT 209 252 11( 44 106 51 l Ot 46 10 7 4 8 10 1 48 102 4 S PRE CINCT 2 10 276 14( 50 132 59 138 54 138 50 1 3 1 5 7 l LS 6 4 PRE CINCT 2 11 2 7 8 14i 59 14i 58 156 47 148 53 142 6 1 146 52 PREC I NCT 2 12 258 12( 42 12 7 34 125 33 119 36 114 43 1 .:2 36 PRE CINCT 2 1.3 27 6 14 ~ 41 1 ~3 41 143 4 8 146 40 143 4 2 141 4 5 PRE CINCT 2 14 4 64 22 ~ SE 230 o2 220 b3 226 52 220 o4 2l3 b l PREC I NCT 2 15 30.ti 13t 3t 135 34 130 3 4 132 3 1 125 4 0 1 21 38 PRECINCT 2 16 3 15 1 3~ 33 1 3t3 29 138 2 7 1J 4 28 1 27 32 1Ll 33 PRE:C I NCT 2 17 2 45 11~ 2 7 123 25 123 24 1 27 2 .:S 11 3 3 1 117 26 PREC I NCT 2 18 300 1 21 43 132 38 1 2t3 41 138 33 lld 45 1 24 41 PRE:CINCT 2 19 2 64 l l ~ 38 1 2~ 36 111 39 114 38 llu 3o 108 41 PRE CINCT 220 3 7E 16 : 54 l o 7 4 9 170 41 174 40 l oO 55 160 4 6 PREC I NCT 221 366 17t 5t 202 38 199 40 200 40 178 58 193 43 PRE:C I NCT 222 231 11 ~ 29 11 ~ 28 118 29 116 28 114 2J 112 30 PREC INCT 223 277 1 2~ 3 7 13( 3 1 127 31 128 32 117 38 125 31 PRE:CINCT 224 296 14( 33 14 ~ 2 3 151 20 144 20 1 37 JJ 143 23 PREC INCT 225 233 l l~ 42 11 ~ 43 115 38 115 39 110 44 100 46 PREC INCT 226 2 45 13L 32 1 .36 4 0 1 37 3 1 138 32 1 .30 3 4 1 27 36 PRECINCT 227 314 15: 70 1 5 7 73 159 62 1 6 1 6 4 147 75 141 18 PRE CINCT 228 34 2 1 8~ 51 1 84 5 1 1 91 44 185 4 9 1 84 4 5 170 SS PRECINCT 229 285 1 3 1 47 132 41 129 46 138 39 129 46 130 4 5 PRE CINCT 230 244 118 29 11.3 28 114 2 1 115 24 l Ot 33 103 35 PREC I NCT 231 252 1 3C 32 1 2C 4 2 1 24 33 138 21 l L l 38 115 4 2 PR ECINCT 232 238 105 34 l Ot 32 109 28 109 L9 105 34 10 l 35 PRE CINCT 233 284 1 34 41 l Jt 35 140 31 13 7 29 133 36 135 3S PRECINCT 234 207 9 1 .,j 0 80 33 91 28 96 25 83 32 84 28 PREC I NCT 235 258 l OE 52 112 4 7 116 43 108 47 10 4 51 99 51 PREC I NCT 236 258 13( 41 12t 4 5 139 36 144 3 4 132 41 132 4C PkcClNCT 237 253 117 4C l O; 4 8 110 46 114 4 0 111 45 100 SC PR EC I NCT 238 3 41 171 5 tl 173 58 184 50 178 52 169 tO 17S 52 PRECI NCT 239 33.li 131 73 13 7 73 153 ~5 14 7 6 1 1 31 74 13.3 6 7 PRECINCT 2 40 198 6~ 33 76 3C 75 30 77 25 6 1 4 1 64 3t PRtCINCT 2 41 97 4 ~ 19 4 8 1 5 50 14 52 12 4 3 .20 49 15 PREC I NCT 242 252 14 41 141 4 0 148 36 142 46 142 44 139 4 5 PREC I NCT 2 43 113 3 ii 16 3t 1 5 39 13 44 ~ 34 15 38 13 PRt:CINCT 2 44 29 1 5 t 4 7 5 7 5 ., 5 7 5 PREC INCT 245 417 18 1 7 9 1 84 73 1 91 69 190 69 17J 77 1 8 7 69 PREC INCT 2 46 219 111 38 1 07 41 107 41 112 34 103 41 104 4 1 PRE: CINCT 247 381 20f 63 2 1C 60 2 16 50 2 14 50 205 57 203 62 PRE CINCT L48 353 172 ';) 7 173 54 175 4 9 170 52 l b5 58 162 60 PREC INCT 249 313 1 5~ 79 155 78 103 70 168 67 145 &5 146 84 PREC I NCT 250 31 8 16( 5 7 1 74 50 174 45 l b9 4 8 153 64 164 52 PRECI NCT 251 4 55 22 t 89 23L 85 233 79 232 75 224 89 2 15 91 PREC I NCT 252 41 8 23C 15 230 71 226 70 237 59 Ll8 71 2 18 74 PR EC I NCT 253 502 26{: 7 fj 2 73 12 2 74 67 2 77 62 252 8 1 2o0 7c PREC I NCT 254 253 120 60 1 2~ 53 130 47 18 5 1 114 60 1.:3 54 PREC I NCT 255 3 43 174 60 177 4 9 1 81 4 6 177 4 8 174 53 17c 47 PREC I NCT 256 304 1 3 i 7 0 145 63 151 57 14 1 58 138 6d 139 6 4 ~ PREC INCT 257 141 59 15 62 11 65 13 57 15 ~ 1 20 60 13 PRECINCT 258 64 28 13 35 7 33 B 31 10 25 15 21 17 PRECINCT 259 252 1 2 4 0 126 38 130 34 126 .33 12 1 3d 12 1 3c PRECINCT 260 299 123 45 1 2.ti 4 4 125 35 1 21 3 7 116 3 7 116 4 0 PREC I NCT 26 1 323 l o .( 79 163 79 163 BO 1 6 7 75 1 5.l 89 155 83 PRECINCT 262 255 111 27 112 29 119 26 116 26 116 2~ 108 30 PRE CINCT 2o3 190 69 28 69 3C 77 25 71 27 70 L9 65 3C PRECINCT 264 326 14~ 47 140 52 136 50 140 4 5 132 !O 128 56 PRE CIN:.T 265 260 1 31 32 1 24 39 1 34 35 l 2b 41 125 39 135 35 PREC INCT 266 287 143 3 6 139 41 1 41 35 13 7 36 132 39 133 3 7 PRE:CI NCT L67 7 8 3 1 16 33 13 29 8 27 10 .27 13 29 ; , TOTAL SUP DI ST 5 l 6966 12775 d222 2461 ~329 ~ts39 7 838 3113 1208~ 8344 ~ 41 9 7 til l ~ 7 64 - --- -- - - -------- STATEMENT UF- ALL VO TLS CAST AT THt GE~tRAL t LECTIGN NlJVt:Mt:ltK 3 1 19 70 PA&t: 36 COURT OF APPE:AL - SECONU DI STRI CT l CGl\T.) DIV . 3 J UDGE CON T. DI V.4 PRES . JUD . I J UL GE OIV . 5 PRt:S . JUC . I J UDGc T c c s s F F [, D I. K A A 0 0 0 c c I I u u A A I I T B B H H L l r N u u s s A E E w w t E: f\ N s s {J 0 L y y E E s s I I v T T 0 l l . T E E E K R c A y y y y y y s E N E N E: N E N ( N (: N T s 0 s 0 s (J s u s u s 0 TOTAL SUP DI ST l l 5223 2233 8 13 7 1413 1988 ~2 71 7556 ' 174 21 1500 8 139 .423 7 199 . 797 TOTAL SUP DI ST 2 ~ 0864 2973 l 0543 l l 45 l b349 ~OSo ~ 7 8 1 f3 824 225C 1 0558 ~ 1 20 ~506 -J603 TOTAL SUP DIST 3 " 102 7 3091 l 0'1L5 ~606 l "J776 3180 l )335 l 05 4 5 ?. 74 7 l 0900 ~5 7 9 l )226 2935 TOTAL SUP DIST 4 9 198 1736 4757 1580 lt7 57 180 l +522 46 75 1660 lt782 . 562 t 5 l d 1737 TOTAL SUP DI ST 5 ] 6966 2 77 5 8222 ~ 4 6 1 ~329 ~839 1 838 8 11 ~ 2685 8344 ~ 41 9 ' 8Ll 2764 SUB TOTALS E 3278 ] ~sea 4 1258~ l 0205 4 2199 l ~ 14 7 4 )Q_j2 4 0578 l 084 2 4 2723 l )103 j ~ 2 7 0 l 1836 ABS ENTEE TOTALS 3747 3 75 1 8 19 2 79 d l O 3 73 741 1 72 7 300 1835 288 L730 3 43 GRAND TOTALS E 7025 13 183 4 4403 l 04 8 4 4 t 009 l ~520 4 773 4 2305 l 1142 4 C.558 1 )391 4 . 000 l 2179 I' . . - S TATEMENT U~ ALL VLl TL5 CAST AT THL GtNE:RAl ~ L f:C Tl ON NUVtM8ER 3 , 19 70 PA(,E: 37 CR T.APL. OI ST. 2 l C ONT) COUtl.TY COUNTY 5U PV. Ml:A ~U Rl:S SUBM IT Tl:D DIV. 5 JUOGE (C.ON T.} SHRF .(.CR . OI S TRI CT 2. TO VOTt UF VOTtRS T R R 5 5 c T c c " N N N 0 E E T T A H A A lJ a 0 u T p p l: E K 0 l T A p p p p p R L T L y y H H l: I\ A E 1 l 2 2 E E I\ T H R v N N T 0 A L 0 s s E I\ I\ I T R N A E G A c I A y y F N y s E N E N u s E N T s 0 s 0 R T s (j PRECINCT 001 297 16 ~ 3 5 153 3 8 1 92 9 1 1 9 1 63 13 1 l CO PRl:CINCT 002 325 17! 37 173 3 9 196 100 202 76 114 1 21 PRECINCT 003 292 144 42 143 38 l 85 83 1 8 7 57 122 &3 PRECINCT 004 371 l 7 ( 3 5 l 71 37 2 52 90 2.19 77 14(, llu PktCINCT 00 ~ 257 12] 3 1 1 2 7 2 5 174 65 1 64 44 10 l ~6 I PRECINCT 006 3 3'1 12~ 45 1 3~ 3 7 206 86 1 98 5 7 116 1 C2 PRECINCT 001 254 1 2 ~ 28 131 2 ! 150 87 183 41 110 95 P~tCINCT 008 336 1 7 ~ 34 1 72 34 l c38 13 1 2.50 54 175 S9 PRE:CINCT 009 256 13( 38 128 32 163 77 177 56 10 4 110 PRECINCT 0 10 425 .2 Ot: 6 5 204 o3 197 178 2.9 7 7 3 19 4 14 ~ PR ECINCT 0 11 403 2lc 3 6 2 12 3 7 177 204 293 74 230 'i 7 PRECINCT 0 1 2 3 86 1 8 ( 3 8 182 33 146 19 7 2 70 63 171 1~ 5 PRl:CINCT 0 13 2 96 17 4 28 lo3 34 117 145 2. 11 48 16" 8 (, PRECINCT 014 272 13 1 2 t. 133 2. 4 1 07 148 l02 48 160 t l PRECINCT 0 15 422 21 l 4 5 20~ 49 173 2 15 3 16 70 226 116 PRECINCT 0 16 369 19~ 4 C 1 8 ~ 47 147 19 7 2 60 63 1 -;C l l l PRECINCT 017 280 1 5 23 163 2 1 l Oo 147 19 1 54 148 74 PRE:C.INCT Ol d 385 1 9 ~ 3 3 1 93 3 6 161 196 276 67 19 7 l Cl P RECINCT 0 19 463 22~ 41 233 3 8 2.04 222 340 !9 2 16 1 3.2. PRE:CINCT 020 473 2.41 69 2 4 5 59 22 ~ 2 12 31 2 115 2 1C 159 PRE:CINCT 0 21 340 1 84 4 2 l d6 3 8 136 1 8 1 254 5 7 173 SC PREC.INCT 022 311 1 5~ 39 1 54 35 158 134 2 49 29 171 12 PRf:CINCT 023 4 08 2 0( 44 1 96 44 2 04 1 8 7 32 53 221 113 PRE:CINCT 024 406 20! 48 205 47 203 172 3 01 57 2 1'7 1 C6 PHECINCT 025 72 40 9 42 7 31 41 6.3 6 39 23 PRECINCT 026 108 SC 14 53 12 39 60 7S 1 9 5 7 3 4 PRE C.INCT 027 3 62 2 0E 44 2. 0 c 42 134 201 2o3 63 l b7 112 PRECINCT 028 3 57 192 3S 193 4 0 148 177 2 6 5 47 177 113 PRECINCT 029 372 16~ 4 2 16~ 4 0 140 18 1 2 1. '1 77 152 114 PRECINCT 030 310 15.: 3C l 5t: 2 o 15 7 127 13 3 33 12 7 l CC PKECINCT 031 388 2 l t 41 ll. c 41 183 178 277 6S 202 113 PRECINCT 032 438 2 2 .: 4C 2. 11 41 l d l 2 18 ,; ;j :j 7 60 2 43 123 P~E C INCT 033 418 22i 52 22" 50 176 2 13 \ 299 77 213 136 PRE:CI NCT 0 34 3d6 17( 4c 177 3S 177 176 264 83 2 19 t l PRtCINCT 035 302 11 t: 4 ( 1 2 2. 35 13 1 142 1. 173 7 1C4 1 C6 PRf:CINCT 0 36 35li 172 3 li l 71 34 127 l d l 241 50 171 'i 2 PRtCINCT 037 393 l 7 ~ 53 173 51 150 208 2 4 5 80 179 1 0~ PKE CINCT 03d 335 13 ~ ~ ( l3t 4 6 128 l d .:S 204 82 15 l 1C2 PRf:ClNCT 039 364 17 ~ 39 1 8( 36 143 190 241 8 1 16 7 122 PRE:ClNCT 0 4 0 314 16 i 39 171 3 2. 130 1 62 234 55 176 8 7 PRECI NCT 0 41 419 22-; 52 2 32 4 6 173 2. 18 299 78 225 15 PKECINCT 0 42 212 11 ~ 8 118 11 8.2 119 140 38 1G4 54 PRECINCT 043 3 60 19 ~ 33 178 33 1 04 227 26 1 63 16 7 1 07 PRECINCT 044 3 07 1 5~ 3 7 1 54 41 114 163 226 .:i9 149 65 PRECINCT 0 45 29 1 1 5~ 44 15" 4 5 74 196 2. 04 53 144 84 , TOTAL SUP DI S T l 1 5223 172.8 7o42 7106 2686 7361 76 4 1. 1658 ~889 l )65o i 5C3 STATEMENT OF All VU T t:~ CA51 AT l Hc uE:Nt:KAL c l tCTION NUVcMuEk 3 , 19 70 ' PAGt: 38 CR T.APL.OI ST. 2 (CuN J) CCJUf'.TY COU ,TY 5UPV . MtASURt~ 5UBM ITTtu lJ 1 V. 5 J UD&E CON T.) SHKF . COK . DI ST k l CT 2 TU VUTt LF VOTERS T R R s s c T c c N N N N 0 t: E T T A H A A u 0 0 0 T p p E E R 0 L T A p t' p p p R l T l y y H H t "' A E: l l 2. 2 E E ~ T H R v N N T 0 A L 0 s s E N f\ I T R N A E G A c l A y y , F N y s E N E ~ 0 s E N T s 0 s 0 K T s (J PRECINCT 0 46 287 135 4 3 1 3 1 39 105 148 98 136 156 70 103 94 PRE:CI NCT 0 47 298 1 5! 2 5 1 5 1 26 152 116 117 145 18 7 ~6 13 1 8 1 PREC I NCT 048 207 109 11 105 14 1 04 82 6 7 110 146 3 4 9 2. t l PRtCINCT 049 2 70 1 2 1 32 l 2.;j 29 112 114 103 117 1 3 1 6 1 92 80 PRECINCT 050 286 1 2 ~ 33 1 23 3 1 123 118 100 130 1 37 69 118 70 PRECI NCT 051 192 7 ~ 25 74 22 86 06 59 80 103 34 7C 50 P REC I NCT 0!2 3 43 14~ 42 142 4 0 143 146 129 147 155 87 117 c:; 2 PRECINCT 053 320 143 41 142 3 4 139 146 119 15 4 192 77 15& 77 PRE CINCT 054 267 1 3( 30 1 2 7 33 12.9 100 9 1 1 2. l 17 35 110 71 PRE:CINCT 055 178 69 26 10 25 10 66 o2 b 8 9 4 3 4 6b 42 PxECI NCT 056 2 15 95 22 95 1 9 94 102 88 99 142 28 77 65 PREClNCT 057 357 l 1 ~ 28 176 28 13) 179 139 106 2.3 66 16C sa PRE CINCT 058 389 1 9~ 47 190 4 9 156 192 1 6 1 178 271 6 7 163 134 PRtC1NCT 059 307 14( 23 143 2.4 139 136 116 145 19 1 ?2 118 ; 1 PRE: C INCT 060 275 1 2 7 31 13t 30 125 122 12.8 113 l bS 4 i 12 ~ 83 PRECINCT 06 l 2 40 95 32 1 04 28 87 132 1 ~ 7 8 1 133 50 100 62 PREC INCT 062 2 76 12& 36 1 3 1 36 1 01 1 51 125 1 24 188 4 4 12 1 78 PRE: C.INCT 063 354 1 5; 43 160 4 3 175 148 154 158 251 55 16 7 c; 7 PRECINCT 0C4 297 11 ~ 3 ! 11 8 3J 150 1L4 18 135 27 33 152 76 PR ECINCT 065 2 26 100 2 4 99 23 81 126 122 87 140 46 93 59 PREC INCT 066 347 1 6~ 4 6 1 66 44 149 173 169 147 23 1 67 1 57 ti6 PRtCINCT 067 3 54 167 39 166 4 0 13 7 19 1 171 135 263 47 168 103 PRE:C INCT 068 3 64 2 12 24 206 24 101 234 19 6 1 34 254 68 194 SS PRECINCT 069 277 11 5 3 1 114 3 1 1 04 14? 133 106 16 7 57 111 84 PREC. I NCT 0 10 255 1 3 4 30 132 2 J 8 1 155 148 82 152 71 12 1 75 PRE:CI NCT 0 71 32 5 14C 60 137 5 7 142 140 15 ; 12 1 204 70 12 7 l C3 PREC1NCT 0 72 282 114 32 113 32 108 149 129 118 185 53 124 86 P RECINCT 0 73 338 144 37 145 36 115 l b8 1 8 1 119 222 64 150 S7 PREC I NCT 074 324 16 t 38 168 3 1 120 18 1 171 116 LC 3 76 1 3 7 l CS PREClNCT 0 7 5 241 l 0 t: 4 0 111 36 106 118 85 124 1.56 52 l OC BC PREC I NCT 0 76 257 llC 38 118 3C l L2 1 21 106 12. 5 166 4 6 S3 9 l PRE t.INCT 0 77 304 l 3d 3o 141 33 143 135 142. 123 192 5 7 137 es PRE CINCT 0 78 3 48 1 6~ 2tj 153 3 1 145 l o4 l !:O 158 231 49 163 e l PRE CINCT 0 79 309 135 44 1 34 4(t 145 136 126 14.5 206 !5 13 1 1 0 1 PRE:Cl NCT 080 338 14"1 39 149 38 128 159 146 1 2 7 11 46 12. 8 e5 PRECINCT 081 274 9 c; 3 4 l 04 3 1 84 153 135 89 166 38 117 lo PREC I NCT 082 24 9 9E 32 112 2 7 1 07 102 9 7 111 14C 50 89 7 1 PRE CINCT 083 221 81 3 7 80 3 1 92 102 83 103 12 7 4 0 90 62 PRtCINCT 084 306 110 36 109 38 120 125 10 4 125 159 54 9 7 t5 P RE Cl t~CT 085 237 98 36 98 32 114 1 04 80 119 15d 3 7 87 86 PKtC.INCT 086 236 9 1 4 6 95 4C 1 07 97 8 4 125 144 5 1 75 c; l P REC I NCT 087 271 134 25 1 3 4 25 133 110 121 117 1 6 4 .53 110 83 PR ECINCT 088 289 139 35 1 3.3 32 147 111 100 145 180 56 106 S7 PREC INCT 089 258 125 4 2 1 2 7 3'1 127 111 95 138 170 4.:5 102 b5 PKEClNCT 090 288 12 7 3 7 125 38 123 139 92 16 1 171 57 1 02 l C.6 PREC I NCT 091 302 149 3 4 155 3 1 1 37 142 117 158 168 78 114 1 C7 PREC I NCT 092 349 l 6 i 3 7 169 36 1 ~ 7 151 132 170 2.0 4 15 136 l ce. PREC I NCT 093 284 120 40 1 2 1 35 99 1 54 1 34 115 l ':S 69 113 6t PREC I NCT 094 405 177 52 1 8 1 4 6 l 70 207 1 57 202 l 4 6 84 155 l .j4 P KEC I NCT 095 477 263 12 2b9 69 231 230 19 1 262. .;4 3 105 254 160 P REC I NCT 096 367 l 9.ti 48 1 9 7 4 9 170 17L 144 180 274 65 172 l .: 6 PRtC1NCT 097 388 202 59 198 5 7 186 182 16 l 19 4 285 76 l ti 7 1 41 P KEC I NCT 098 284 147 34 1 52 29 1.20 144 l l! 135 19 7 55 118 1C6 PRE C.INCT 0':19 2.94 145 43 1 44 41 145 l L8 129 142 196 60 12'1 ., c; PRE: CI NCT 100 350 17 ~ 43 177 39 1 62 l o l 158 166 250 58 165 lCL PRE CINCT 10 1 350 160 43 1 62. 39 148 185 129 19 4 222 &2 13 1 1 2.3 PRECINCT 102 3 37 167 .;O l o9 29 1 64 1 4 8 111 193 234 58 152 llC P REC I "'CT 103 366 183 50 185 4 CJ 135 206 156 1 8 1 256 78 185 l Cc PRECINCT 1 04 304 149 39 1 51 39 11 ~ 1 64 130 149 199 58 1 31 St PRf:CINCT 105 327 1 6 1 47 166 44 158 138 1 21 177 .:11 76 158 111 PRE C.INCT 106 304 159 32 156 36 14 7 139 113 172 2 18 63 146 1C2 PRE CINCT 10 7 323 174 J 7 172 3 7 160 150 120 179 225 68 150 114 PRt:CINCT l Otl 498 2.~ 6 45 2 49 52 231 229 221 l2B 326 103 239 143 PRE CINCT 109 399 214 28 2 19 2.4 200 179 119 249 301 59 19 1 1 / PRECINCT 110 35 5 17.5 47 l 77 4 4 170 160 110 2 16 230 Bl 160 1 12 PRtCINCT 111 207 103 33 100 3 7 72 130 87 109 12.9 47 87 75 PRE CINCT 112 433 2 16 53 209 58 225 181 162 232 3 1 5 67 .:11 1 3 1 PHEC I NCT 113 2ti5 156 20 156 22 118 142 13 4 117 190 65 136 91 TOTAL !UP DI ST 2 4 0864 251 7 985C ~ 8 7 9 '1 12. 1 ~ C34 9 969 9802 '242.3 9029 :!581 l j440 3 12 STATEMENT UF ALL VO l tS C.A$T AT THE Gt l'lEKAL ELtCTl ON NOVtMBE:K 3 , 19 70 PAGl 39 CR T.AP L.Ol !T . 2 CClJN T C. GU, fY CCU~TY SU PV. M tA SUK t: S S lBMl T TE:O 0 IV . 5 J ULJGt: CCUNT. J SHRF . COR . Dl!TKl CT 2. Tu VOTE: l) F \IU T E: i{ S T R R s s c T (, c N N N r 0 E: E T T A H A A L u 0 (; T p p E E R (; L T A p p p p p R L T L y y H H E N A E l l 2. 2 E E N T h R v N N T 0 A L 0 s s E t\ N I T R N A E G A c I A y y F N y s E N E N 0 s E N T s 0 s 0 R T s (J PRECINCT 114 r;7 12i 36 12t 33 112 124 174 50 123 7 b PRECINCT 115 410 19 33 201 30 134 224 274 58 180 102 PRE:CINCT 116 304 1 3 ~ 27 131 23 121 146 175 53 111 79 - PRECINCT 117 383 21! 44 215 42. 148 211 281 76 197 1.: 8 PRECINCT 118 403 2.4! 25 233 2 1 138 226 304 65 23 1 9; PRECINCT 119 289 13 ~ 25 14.i:i 22 1.23 138 196 51 13 1 E4 PxEC INCT 120 3 3.t; 18 l 31 18 29 13 .i:i 177 238 67 163 l c E; PRE:CINCT lLl 2 13 9 l 4 f 10( 4 5 89 106 1 53 50 1 0 ~ 81 PRECIN CT 122 157 6~ 24 7( 21 63 82 101 37 65 55 PRECINCT 1 3 432 22( ~o 2 1! SC 203 l 'i7 314 92 22 1 130 PRE:C.INCT 14 447 23 l 61 2.32 56 2L5 196 330 78 213 144 PRECINCT 125 382 1 7 l 4t 183 4 0 170 172 71 6 4 181 i C7 PRECINCT 120 3 78 2 3( 31 2 .31 30 162 19d 290 56 209 1C8 PRE CINCT 127 445 23l 5 (. 2 33 4 8 178 235 330 6 ts 23 llc PRECINCT 128 45E 231 6( 2 41 52 2.24 202 3 54 66 250 13C PRtCINCT 12.9 48 1 27 ( 61 l b~ 5a 235 2 18 3o c; b4 L6b l Lb PRE:CINCT 130 37Li 20 ~ 5 1 202 4 '3 199 152 28S 5~ 189 1 3C PRECINCT 1 31 41~ 24" 51 2 3 ~ 51 196 196 3 15 64 2.7 17 PRECINCT 132 312 2 0. 47 20t 4 5 188 163 67 71 196 1 L4 PRECINCT 133 47E 18 ~ 58 l 8t 56 170 249 3 15 71 209 135 PRECINCT 134 383 201 41 1 9~ 46 221 140 280 60 l b7 142 PRECINCT 135 396 2 4 . 53 24 'i 4 ; 243 145 303 65 2.16 l L9 PRECINCT 136 351 1 6~ 47 166 4 6 188 147 253 75 l dd 119 PRECINCT 13 7 303 l 5i 45 1 53 42 152. 129 2.16 58 155 ES PKE CINCT 138 529 2 8~ 6G 283 59 269 237 414 76 Ld4 15b PRE:CINCT 139 3 56 2 0i 54 208 50 179 152 28~ 57 19 1 117 PRE:CI NCT 140 290 14 i .5.2 15( 47 161 110 206 o5 12G 126 PRELI NCT 141 329 16 t 52 166 4 8 16 1 144 2.41 53 130 1 32 PRECINCT 142 4 05 20f SC 20~ 50 23 0 152 L85 82 175 1 52 PRECINCT 143 322 17~ 46 l 1 t 40 161 132 Ll1 70 132 l 3C PRt.CINCT 144 332 18t 40 185 35 1 37 164 .2 13 8.:i 138 135 PRECINCT 145 339 17i 59 193 47 180 l .J5 L31 73 159 15 PKECI NCT 146 294 15 ] _j 14j 37 133 139 217 50 129 1 C7 PRECINCT 147 413 21 i 62 21 j 54 204 J 78 281 87 180 147 PRE CINCT 148 435 221 7C 223 64 190 214 291 c;a 0L 1 58 PRECINCT 149 358 191 5C l 9E 50 176 155 L31 80 166 15 PRt.CINCT 150 4 18 2 0 l 6.2 2 0.J 6 1 2 18 169 301 63 179 146 PRECINCT 1 51 372 162 60 l 7C 52 199 141 L!S 55 139 136 PRE:CINCT 1 52 315 12 1 45 11 50 Ll 9 68 271 22 163 12 PRE:CINCT 1 53 400 13! 76 137 75 299 57 3 75 9 227 SS PRECINCT 154 312 10 .t 6 l 05 60 2J4 38 . 295 11 162 SS PRECINCT 155 2 46 8~ 6 1 88 57 180 30 229 6 116 d3 PRE:CINCT 156 331 13 ~ 62 14C 56 250 4d 297 19 16 7 1 06 PRECINCT 1 57 376 112 76 112 13 271 55 344 20 166 l . 8 PR ECINCT 158 274 9 ~ 5 5 96 54 221 31 259 5 138 e4 PRE:CINCT 1 59 419 2 lt 53 Ll7 51 234 160 3 3C 60 22.2 18 PRECINCT l tO 414 234 70 239 64 22.8 l o3 303 77 17Y 175 PRE CINCT l 61 317 14t J l .3 t 42 123 171 208 75 l L l 18 PRECIN CT 162 459 23 ~ 6~ .2 4 2 67 255 178 3 40 b2 2C4 177 PRELI NCT 163 313 17~ !:t l 7 ~ 53 165 137 230 l:3 139 1.:7 PRECINCT 104 364 191 70 189 7 .2. .200 145 244 9 7 151 150 PRECINCT 165 1 88 c; ( .32 99 23 96 78 132 36 tl l c7 PRECINCT 166 188 6~ 2. 6 7 ~ 2C 70 94 11.: 45 61 E6 PRE:CINCT 167 461. 2 1~ 6~ 207 t4 194 2.30 2.96 ;; 189 l c5 PR ECINCT 168 338 l7E 4L l 76 41 141 l 7!: 2. 12 14 . llC 14 3 PRECINCT 169 333 15i 38 157 38 95 205 l 8c 80 119 1. () PRECINCT 170 374 18 t 26 1 91 22. 121 207 2 10 1 c; 150 1 C9 PRECINCT 171 3 10 123 2 1 123 .2 5 d7 183 1 84 52. 106 t:5 PR ECINCT l 7 2. 256 12 ~ 14 115 16 93 133 157 43 99 54 . TOTAL SUP 01ST 3 ~ 1027 Z869 l 04 90 ti98 l 3604 :#833 l b429 '27 07 l 0390 l 5280 9 7S - - STATEMENT OF All VO TcS CAST Al THE uENE:KAL EltCT l ON NOVEMtlER ~ , 1970 PAGE: 4C CKT . APL . OI5T. 2 CON T) CCJlJNTY COUNTY SU PV . MEASURtS SUBM lTl tU DI V 5 J UU c, E (C ON T.) SHRF . COR . OI5TR1CJ 2 TO VOTE OF VOTtRS T R R s 5 c T c c N N N l'4 0 E: E T T A H A A (J (J 0 (J T p p t: E R c l T A p p p p p R l T L y y H H E: N A E l l L -t. E E N T h R v N N T L A L 0 s 5 E ~ I\ I T R N A E (, A c I A y y F N y s E N E N 0 s t I\ T s 0 s (j R T s u PRECINCT 173 280 lli 27 117 2 7 94 161 138 75 79 114 PRECINCT 174 278 129 42 141 31 94 161 174 58 9L 113 PR EC INCT 175 31~ 12 47 128 48 136 141 192 6b 121 1 C9 PKt:CINCT 176 348 l 7~ 87 192 74 189 140 223 103 133 173 PRE:C INCf 177 295 13~ 59 136 59 163 llL LOS 60 132 114 PRECINCT 178 280 12! 72 126 71 164 98 ldO 75 113 121 PRECINCT 179 325 13 ~ 56 13-, ~7 1~7 129 195 7 8 132 llS PRECINCT 180 312 13~ 39 139 36 146 116 185 b5 121 1C2 PRECINCT 1 8 1 404 20( 54 LOS 49 250 117 2 7 6 b5 18 t: 13S PRt:Cl~CT l o2 24(: 13 1 43 1 32 43 134 99 108 55 117 c;c PRE:C.INCT 183 408 2 1t 8 ~ 21 ~ 79 2~2 l ,j5 t.83 110 203 1 5f: PRECINCT 184 263 141 42 152 43 ll.1 115 166 76 107 114 PRECINCT 185 300 1 5~ 62 16( ?6 164 103 1 9 7 82 13t. 11 PRECINCT 186 278 131 65 132 06 15 1 111 17l 87 95 142 PRECINCT 1 87 223 1 0~ 4 ( 104 4q 118 91 140 55 81 l CC PRE:C.INCT l tl8 232 1 0 ~ 41 l Ot 3~ 119 92 118 70 69 1C3 PRt:C 11~CT 189 330 15 ~ 78 15? 74 160 139 1 99 96 124 152 PRECINCT 190 195 8 1 3 1 19 32 99 73 98 62 bl 7S PRECINCT 191 241 l Oi 3 7 116 28 133 76 152 48 10~ ?6 PRECINCT 192 314 173 69 1 80 62 190 106 221 8.2 147 143 PRECINCT 193 267 11 t 60 125 54 l?O 97 171 74 106 116 PRECINCT 194 239 117 45 127 36 116 96 149 65 10 '4 c,2 PRf:CINCT l q5 204 Bi 53 90 5 1 116 69 122 60 92 7 '1 PRECINCT 196 75 31 12 31 11 35 33 35 30 23 31 PR EC INCT 197 252 141 61 146 53 123 116 179 6L. 105 1 25 PRE:CINCT 198 246 11~ 64 114 62 129 1 04 154 70 96 114 PRECINCT 199 235 11( 3 4 111 .S 4 135 79 1 2; 06 68 1C7 PRE:C I 1'4CT lOO 4 25 23E 75 23ti 74 239 162 317 77 223 146 PRECINCT 201 358 21( 5! 207 59 .215 ll8 t.56 74 171 133 PRE:CINCT 202 290 l 7 ~ 44 174 4C 160 114 .2 15 59 160 SS PREC INCT 20J 2 12 12! 35 1 24 36 1 07 91 154 47 94 CJ2 PREC I NCT 204 249 142 53 14 "l 46 130 108 185 47 122 l CO PR EC INCT 205 123 8 1 14 91 11 12 49 ., 6 19 62 47 PRt:CINCT 206 157 6( 18 6: 1 9 b3 71 86 45 48 ~7 . I . TOTAL SUP DIST 4 9198 170b +64 l t3b32 !285 ~835 (+551 1 6 11 +830 :932 s726 STATtM ENT OF ALL VLlllS CAST AT THE GENERAL ElttllLN NOVtM~ER J , 197C PAGt 41 CRT . APL.OIST.2 (CONT l COUNTY COUNTY SU PV MlASURI~ SUBMITTlU OIV . 5 JUDGE (C. ON T. j SHRF . C.CR. DISTRICT 2 TU VUTI o~ vOTlRS T R R 5 s c T c c N N N N 0 E I: T T A H A A c u L (; T p p t: E ~ 0 L T A p p p p p R l T L y y H H E N A I: l l 2 2 . E I: N T H R v N N T 0 A L 0 s s E N N I T R N A E G A c I A y y F N y s E N E N 0 s E N T s 0 s 0 R T ~ L PRECINCT 207 388 197 75 195 74 172 188 231 102 12S 1!6 PRt:ClNCT 208 270 146 43 147 43 114 141 178 66 115 112 PRECINCT 209 252 9 j 50 103 ~l 107 120 1 34 76 84 llC PRECINCT 210 276 131 58 133 ~8 121 138 160 82 75 14S PRECINCT 211 278 144 57 155 49 126 133 l 7 " 79 106 1 LS PRECINCT 212 258 114 41 12C 41 115 103 161 55 105 93 PRtCINCT 213 276 140 44 142 40 123 127 174 67 93 136 PRECINCT 214 46t; 21(: 63 221 57 177 240 27t:. 126 179 lS4 PRECINCT 215 30.i; 122 3E 130 36 122 146 162 7'1 96 114 PRECINCT 216 315 12 .i; 35 134 28 140 125 164 72 9L 115 PRECINCT 217 245 11~ 2(: 12( 29 99 119 l2L 71 72 S2 PKECINCT 218 300 121 3 c; 12 (: 37 131 133 144 95 8tl l.:!2 PRECINCT 219 26-l lOt 42 11~ 31 117 llo l L ) 92 ti2 114 PRECINCT 220 378 16~ 45 16 43 151 168 l c;5 109 115 lt6 PRECINCT 221 366 19~ 43 199 42 144 193 202 118 13t: 152 PRECINCT 222. 231 10 ~ 32 11~ 21 110 91 140 51 85 bl PRECINCT 223 277 12~ 3( 12 .i; 32 116 138 151 72 88 111 PRECINCT 224 296 14(: 21 14(: 19 112 154 lo4 88 106 11 ; PRECINCT 225 233 10( 42 104 39 96 105 113 77 d5 S7 PREC.INCT 226 245 l2i j~ 135 32 102 118 151 54 8 9 S2 PRECINCT 227 314 15( 71 15'4 67 147 142 lb5 92 119 141 PRECINCT 228 342 l 7C ~1 179 49 143 149 201 77 118 15'4 PRECINCT L29 2.85 126 45 138 31 112 139 150 93 8 1 133 PRECINCT 230 244 lOt 29 101 32 107 113 130 57 64 SS PRECINCT 231 252 123 34 132 24 108 104 13C 70 8 4 1 Cit PRECINCT 232 238 103 31 l 05 35 1 02 108 125 66 74 sc; PRECINCT 233 284 131 33 11t3 21 126 119 142 78 86 112 PREC1NCT 23'4 207 85 35 8t 27 80 93 99 '4 8 43 86 PRECINCT 235 258 l Q.t. SC l 04 50 122 100 135 t:S 77 1C7 PRECINCT 236 258 132 3 ;j 13S 3~ 119 117 l '4 5 76 c;s l C; PRECINCT 231 253 10~ 4E 10 46 116 113 160 o l 77 114 PRECINCT 238 341 17L, 51 l 7 tl 52 160 154 2.2J d9 13L 153 PRECINCT 239 33.i; 141 62 152 56 149 149 201 82 IG6 152 PRECINCT 240 198 61 3 (:; 6~ 32 90 15 11 c; 40 c3 79 PRECINCT 241 97 5( lt SC 11 41 49 53 29 31 46 PRECINCT 242 252 13 .i; 48 143 .39 104 128 168 57 9C 115 PRECINCT 243 113 3~ 12 4C 13 50 46 50 29 2b 3~ PRECINCT 244 29 1 5 ' 5 10 15 15 8 5 15 PRECINCT 2'45 417 18( 73 18 ~ 66 188 202 257 111 153 185 PRECINCT 246 219 103 38 1 Qi 31 ~I 105 143 55 76 1 C7 PRE:CINCT 247 381 204 58 201 58 165 187 247 94 153 159 PRECINCT 248 353 162 57 164 56 154 164 Ll3 97 ILL 1 62 P.RECINCJ" 249 313 1 4~ 82 15(:; 76 120 162 189 91 90 172 PREC I NCT 250 318 16t 51 l 7 2. 48 131 163 LOS tl2 122 136 PREC I NCT 251 455 22-l 83 22t 79 2.:S2 196 i.17 131 13, LL1 PRt:C I NCT 252 418 22~ 65 228 67 184 205 210 107 144 204 PRECINCT 253 502 26~ 73 260 73 235 229 3 4(; ! CS 209 lC5 PRECINCT 254 253 117 56 123 54 119 117 162 13 es 132 PRECINCT 255 343 l 7 t 47 178 52 151 161 213 102 134 l~C PRECINCT 256 304 13t 65 143 64 141 139 201 7 c; 95 l (;2 PREC.INCT 257 ltl 5 15 64 10 53 71 65 39 3 c; 53 PRECit-.CT 258 64 2 I. 14 29 12 31 21 8 23 le L(; PRECINCT 259 252 11 ~ 37 12 ~ 31 97 125 144 66 67 117 PRECINCT 260 299 1 l (: 35 12( 36 144 114 166 79 71 145 PRECINCT 261 323 151 c39 16 79 150 157 198 97 11 ; l t:C PRECINCT /.62. 255 l Ot 29 112 25 109 117 122 12 6S c6 PREC1NCT 263 190 6~ 28 1 t. 23 75 99 8b 06 38 S5 PRECINCT 264 326 121 59 133 49 98 183 169 103 80 l .5C PRECINCT 265 260 11 ~ 42 126 34 130 104 131 61 105 7~ PREC I NCT 266 287 133 38 134 32 110 134 141 73 c;o 1C2 PRECINCT 267 78 29 10 32 b .:SO 35 34 ~2 15 33 . . . . TOTAL SUP DIST 5 l 6966 .120 8122 t7 905 i 576 5651 7831 12 525 7325 -J17 5 7 312 STATtMENT OF All VO TE:S CAS T AT THE: Gt~E:RA L t LEC fION NuV(MBE:K 3 , 19 7C PAGE: 4 .t. CR T. APL. Ol Sl. l. (CON T) COUNTY CGUNrY SUPV . MEASUKE:S SUBM ITTEU UIV. 5 J UUGE CONT.) SHRF. COR . DI STRICT 2. TO VOTE Of VOTERS T R R s s (. T c c N "' N N 0 E E l T A H /J A c 0 u (J T p ~ E E: R G L T A p p p p p R L T L y y H H E N A t l l 2 ,(_ E E ~ T H R v N N T 0 A l 0 s s E "' N I T K N A E G A c I A y y F N y s E N E N 0 s E ~ T s 0 s 0 R T s u TOTAL SUP DI ST l l 5223 1728 7642 17106 2686 7361 7642 1658 889 l b 65~ 15C3 TOTAL SUP DI ST 2 0864 ' 12 51 7 9850 19879 ~ 7 2 7 4034 9 S69 9802 \2423 ~ 029 d5t:$ l l 3440 :3 72 TOTAL SUP DI ST 3 ' 1027 2869 l 04 9( 8981 3604 183 3 l 042 :Z 1 01 1 0390 l :280 975 TOTAL SUP DI ST 4 9 198 1706 46 41 13032 ~285 .:i 835 4551 1 611 4-830 )9j2 372.6 TOTAL SUP DI ST 5 ; 6 966 - 720 8122 ~ 905 ff !76 5651 17831 2 !:2 5 7325 -l775 7 372. SUB TOTALS l 3 278 1 1 540 " 0751 3 7503 9727 1 ~1 85 3 b 649 4 0 2 5~ 1 K924 .3 ld 463 13581 : :083 2 B94b ABScNTE E TOTAL S 3747 334 17 87 1756 405 561 l475 1743 304 l 5 72 644 2731 3J2 GRAND TOTALS E 7025 l 1874 4 12538 3 19259 lb 132 l 7746 3 71 24 4 1998 l 1228 4 :l035 :J 22~ 5 7ij 14 .3 )280 \ . . STATEMENT OF ALL VLlTt~ CA5T AT THE: GEl'.f:KA L t l Ec T ION NOV: MBE R 3 19 7 0 ' PAC., t: 43 MtA~UKLS SUBM I lTEU TO VCTt OF VOTERS CGNT . ) T N N N ~ f\ t\ f\ t\ f\ t\ N N (J 0 u lJ 0 0 0 c c 0 0 l.J 0 T A l 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 v 0 T E c A y y y y y y s E N E N E N E N E N E: N T s 0 s 0 s 0 s 0 s 0 s u PREC I NCT 001 297 12f 1 0 7 126 l l 7 175 69 170 66 144 c; l 105 141 PRECINCT 002 325 15 t 95 129 124 194 o l 188 60 14.l 103 118 140 PREC.INCT 003 292 13 l b5 l2. t3 94 171 57 147 80 1 37 79 l OC 120 PRECINCT 004 371 164 100 142 12 7 185 78 182 73 l '.d 96 133 135 PRECINCT 005 257 1 2 7 68 117 73 144 52 138 45 119 73 9:3 1C6 PRECINCT 006 334 15C 81 130 104 165 62. 152 73 135 8 7 110 1 2 . PREC INCT 007 25t; 8~ 118 82 123 134 80 175 35 122 82 13C 78 PREC INLT 008 336 14~ 13 7 12 7 152 200 d4 2 17 ' 1 170 1 0.3 142 1 3 1 PRE.:CINCT 009 256 11( 108 102 122 134 89 172 4 5 122 92. 104 111 PR EC INCT 0 10 425 l 8t; 159 174 168 260 94 253 84 173 1 6! 172 175 PRECINCT 0 11 403 171 161 141 207 2 19 140 261 72 209 1L9 19 1 14i: PRl:ClNC.T 0 12 1d6 16 ~ 1 5( 14~ 1 6 d LC9 107 231 74 16 7 133 159 15L PRECINCT 0 13 296 1 0~ 152 l 0( 156 162 101 197 59 146 103 1 5 1 9 7 PRECINCT 014 272 11] 111 l O! 128 147 87 178 43 141 86 125 l C l PR EC INCT 0 15 422 16t l 8t; 15~ 200 245 123 267 62 184 163 187 162 PREC INCT 0 16 3o9 1 5 1 1 '.)2 123 l d5 209 108 242 59 l 'J 1 102 176 135 PRECINCT 017 2d0 9 1 13 7 77 154 130 106 170 54 125 10.2 149 83 PRECINCT 0 18 385 16! 145 1 2 1 195 2 19 1 0 1 244 61 187 114 164 143 PRECINCT 0 19 463 18 t l dO 17 ~ 199 280 111 2 79 76 l titl 170 2 lL 146 PRl=CINCT 020 473 21~ 181 167 223 283 120 283 93 247 136 182 207 PRECINCT 021 340 1 6 1 1 .26 133 154 190 103 2 18 6! 17.2 1 0.2 148 1 34 PREC INCT 022 311 12t 1.26 119 140 173 90 20 l 46 156 1 0 1 l19 115 PREC INCT 023 408 17'i 172 183 169 25S 96 283 5 7 2.06 130 190 152 PREClNCT 024 406 1 87 155 169 172 242 11 5 2 7 5 61 194 142 166 18 1 PREC I NCT 025 7 2 3(: 3 1 24 44 42 24 50 17 41 25 42 24 PRE:CINCT 026 108 5 1 41 46 47 61 36 62 24 53 37 38 5 1 PRECINCT 027 362 14~ 165 127 196 201 123 260 50 209 98 170 150 PRECINCT 028 357 129 175 135 172 19 4 123 240 6U 18 1 118 177 135 PRECl"4CT 029 372 145 135 118 16 4 202 87 224 5 1 195 76 138 136 PRECINCT 030 3 10 1 2~ 116 118 120 183 63 174 58 1!8 76 13 1 116 PRECINCT 031 388 19; 126 16~ 173 245 95 255 69 19d 13 166 16 l PREC INCT o_,.z 438 16S 207 162 2.20 223 lt9 303 68 220 154 .2 14 15 c:; Pl{E:CINCT 033 418 171 188 148 2 1 8 2~3 115 292 63 223 134 187 164 PRECINCT 034 386 165 1 51 153 176 2 13 115 260 53 17d 132 163 154 PRE:CINCT 035 302 119 l Ol 86 135 147 84 149 66 112 109 9 1 13 4 PREC I NCT 036 354 14 ~ 125 132. 145 184 90 2 13 57 179 90 133 141 PRE\-INCT 037 393 1 3~ 170 1 0 1 211 207 104 235 79 178 12d 166 145 PRECI CT 038 335 12(: 135 89 180 165 1 0 1 198 62 162 Y4 140 1 2 7 PR E:CJNCT 039 364 173 129 133 172 208 97 2 17 76 173 113 142 16 1 PRECINCT 040 3 14 l l 'l 1 5 1 108 1 6 7 1 8~ 94 207 62 165 112 143 l .27 PRECINCT 041 419 172 192 134 230 230 139 .285 78 229 lJ.2 18J 183 PRECINCT 0 42 212 9 4 69 8tl 78 117 44 120 31 l OL 55 '] 3 93 PRl=C l NCT 0 43 360 129 l b3 114 194 177 13 1 231 61 lo9 124 153 1 3 7 PRECINCT 0 44 307 14 2 103 139 113 1 87 6: 193 50 143 103 130 117 PR EC INCT 045 291 1 0~ 129 94 139 126 111 173 55 133 9 7 119 1 1 5 . TOTAL SUP DI!T l l 5223 15992 15~92 ft245 g464 :+823 :445 6J55 lb '14 8 8479 ~696 7 341 ~943 PRECINCT 0 46 PRECINCT 0 47 PRECINCT 0 48 PRECINCT 0 49 PRECI NCT 050 PRECINCT 051 PRECI NCT 052 PREC1NCT 053 PRECINCT 054 PRECI NCT 055 PRECINCT 0~ 6 PRECIN CT 051 PRECI NCT 058 PRECINCT 059 PRECI NCT 060 PRECINCT 061 PRE:CINCT 062 PRELI NCT 063 PREC INCT 064 PKE:CINCT 065 PRECINCT 066 PRECINCT 067 PRECINCT 068 PRECINCT 069 PRECI NCT 0 10 PREC INCT 0 71 PRECINCT 0 12 PRECINCT 0 13 PRECI NCT 074 PRl:CINCT 0 7 5 PRE: CINCT 0 7 6 PRECI NCT 077 PREC INCT 0 78 PRE:C INCT 0 79 PR ECINCT 080 PRtCINCT 081 PRECI NCT 082 PR EC I~ C T 083 PRE:CI NCT 084 PREC INCT 085 PRE CI NCT 0 t36 PR ECINCT 087 PRE:CINCT 088 PRECINCT 089 PRECIN CT 090 PR ECI NCT 091 PRE CI NCT 092. PRECI NCT OJ3 PRECINCT 094 PRECINCT 095 PRECINCT 096 PRE CI NCT 097 PRECINCT 098 PRECI NCT 099 PRE CINCT 100 PRECINCT 1 0 1 PRECINCT 102 PRECINCT 103 PR ECINCT 1 04 PRECINCT 105 PRECINCT 106 PRECINCT 1 07 PRECINCT 1 08 PRECINCT 109 PR EC INCT 110 PRECINCT 111 PRECINCT 112 PRE CINCT 113 OTAL 5UP DI ST 2 ~ T A T EMEN T OF All VO TtS LAST AT THE: bENERAL ELECTION NUVt:M8ER 3 , 19 7L MEASURt~ SUuM I TTtO TO VGTE OF VOTcRS CtGNT.) T 0 T A L I/ 0 T E c A ! T 287 298 207 270 286 192 3 43 3 20 267 178 2 15 357 389 307 2 75 2 40 276 35 297 226 347 354 364 277 255 325 282 338 324 241 257 304 34 8 309 338 2 7 2 4q 221 306 237 236 2 71 289 258 288 302 349 28 405 477 367 388 28 294 350 350 337 366 304 327 304 323 498 39 9 3 55 201 433 285 N 0 3 y E s 129 1 3 9 11 12 8 14 13 10 7 8 14 16 11 10 8 10 16 12 a 12 12 12 91 9 10 10 12 11 11 12 1 1 29 13 13 12 10 10 10 120 102 112 1 0 4 147 112 136 133 14 1 2L 21 238 188 19 - 13 14 17 14 15 16 138 150 15 156 197 1 86 188 81 199 132 N u 3 0 84 87 62 62 73 42 76 108 75 3 63 l .l.l 14 111 11 92 llC 11 119 77 1 31 160 1 61 106 109 141 109 141 138 71 11 106 130 l Ob 106 78 58 4 8 71 75 58 9 6 68 88 82 99 114 82 103 l b6 125 153 9 1 105 112 14 3 117 150 1 07 128 1 07 116 204 149 106 85 155 112 0864 7146 9 7 0 N (J 4 y E: s 1.2 1 122 98 98 113 7 12 11 tj 105 7 73 129 14 11 9 62 82 15 13 74 1 07 126 112 93 1 80 77 1 22 113 107 99 12 123 11 106 80 102 86 119 105 103 87 133 103 118 109 138 100 1 87 1 87 159 l 6G 11 123 143 1 31 1 55 136 1 24 113 117 132 163 1 57 1 51 67 163 q6 854 N u 4 N G 87 1 0 1 74 88 dJ 4 8 103 126 82 4 0 75 144 l 6S 11 5 13 1 109 134 133 1 0 7 95 156 164 190 11 9 138 158 13 7 144 141 86 100 llC 143 125 120 1 01 74 63 7 8 80 76 12 1 91 98 1 01 120 133 106 132. 244 163 1 86 126 12 4 149 l 5ts 13 4 1 80 ll.2 172 149 141 238 1 83 148 103 195 144 5 14 I\ L 5 y E s 164 164 139 131 1 51 89 152 177 135 85 112 199 222 152 156 125 142. 206 199 112 173 2 16 171 130 1L8 180 148 170 152 153 156 1 84 172 106 164 148 1 2 ~ 115 153 144 129 146 178 148 161 162 186 150 232 283 226 251 179 1 83 208 2 18 2 13 2 12 195 206 184 201 280 233 234 125 268 113 l 744 I\ G 5 N G 55 59 3 1 50 43 2.9 71 7 5 50 30 40 ts3 9 7 73 67 48 70 88 4 9 6 7 95 87 146 82 d3 79 77 97 103 48 50 53 95 62 71 47 46 38 49 44 47 6q 43 52 58 11 77 58 84 149 1 03 102 58 70 89 78 77 1 0 7 58 80 79 76 1 36 109 70 47 94 76 850 I\ c 6 y E s 119 152 116 113 119 7 8 153 175 1 32 66 111 2 14 220 1 57 161 116 158 201 190 120 195 236 235 146 106 186 1 53 19 4 178 136 145 169 198 171 l b 4 133 111 108 132 115 104 143 143 139 143 1 50 159 129 2 16 3 19 Ll.4 2 49 160 167 226 212 1 9 7 225 169 192 199 206 3 10 2 60 208 111 250 175 l 533 I\ lJ 6 N 0 89 71 50 68 69 44 79 6 7 48 39 38 60 78 52 46 52 56 6 1 43 41 56 47 64 56 38 51 55 ~ 5 12 55 4 0 62 58 63 ! l 46 54 46 52 59 66 60 68 58 69 76 100 72 9 2 103 83 86 63 71 54 67 67 75 66 83 5 7 60 84 76 8 4 5 1 97 58 Ld3 I\ c. 7 y E s 12 7 143 105 110 112 72 144 142 119 65 84 169 l t;O 130 113 114 12 7 159 13& 10 1 163 180 169 128 144 169 l .l9 186 153 123 125 12. 7 128 1 3 1 138 114 106 98 96 85 83 113 119 102 12.5 136 155 135 176 265 174 l.O 7 149 153 168 172 1 64 209 136 166 161 164 260 217 175 103 2L l 143 697 N 0 7 N 0 84 78 57 71 76 50 80 92 67 47 60 9 7 123 84 95 50 7d 120 95 63 9 4 104 l 26 75 58 7 lj 80 76 9 7 71 6 7 105 124 108 74 71 ~9 5 1 82 8 7 94 83 9 4 9 1 90 93 l Cl 69 12. 7 164 13L 12.8 71 86 109 100 106 98 99 110 97 110 140 113 114 bO 132. so 16 1 N 0 B y E s 82 96 79 60 95 62 119 118 96 55 12. 138 156 118 1C8 95 1 27 153 135 9 4 135 151 164 95 115 110 111 150 136 91 ~c 109 140 94 l LO 105 76 73 80 71 70 93 106 97 83 91 112 98 147 2 18 144 160 92 1C9 140 1 3 1 129 153 110 122 151 133 193 174 119 67 152 114 788 l"4 0 8 N 0 13C 1L4 84 122 100 56 1.:5 116 94 54 6 7 129 156 105 1 0 1 7 6 7S 12e 103 67 1 24 l .:SO 13 7 114 9 1 1 31 95 llC 1 2 7 103 1C6 126 1 31 147 106 88 81 77 118 102 9 ; 112 11 5 102 128 1 3 4 1 6 1 llC 156 201 l 5b 166 129 1 27 144 146 14.: 155 126 156 116 141 209 150 173 96 193 123 234 PAbc 44 STATEMENT UF ALL VOTE~ CAS T AT TH l Gl:f\ERAL ELlCTION l\OVtMdER 3 , 19 70 PAGt 4; MEA SUKI:, SUBMI TTEO TO VGTc OF VOT ER~ l CGNT . j T N N N N t\ ~ t\ N t\ N t'i N 0 u 0 0 0 c 0 c c (. (J (J 0 T A . L 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 e 8 v 0 T E c A y y y y y y . s E N E N E N E N E: N E: N T s 0 s 0 s 0 s c 5 (J s 0 PREC I NCT 1 14 257 113 106 92 122 148 70 166 42 134 74 90 128 PRECINCT 115 410 137 168 107 209 210 108 238 58 207 98 173 132 PREC I NCT 116 304 11 ~ 90 7 iJ 131 146 66 138 57 121 70 8~ 12 ~ PREC I NCT 117 383 141 192 107 229 167 176 260 75 197 140 1 87 145 PRECINCT 118 403 153 197 134 221 193 160 280 48 201 138 218 125 PREC I NC.T 119 289 115 109 96 135 173 06 158 61 137 84 102 120 PREC I NCT 120 33~ 151 133 119 173 193 102 216 68 168 115 131 144 PRECINCT 121 213 l 0( 9C 79 116 139 ?6 150 41 119 6? 88 97 PRECl~CT 122 157 7 ~ 57 56 73 90 41 98 23 86 39 oo 61 PRECINCT 123 432 21 ~ 13t 191 177 2BL 104 2HO 75 197 16 l 106 PREC INCT l ~" 124 447 22L 15i 20( 184 275 116 294 68 240 ll. 1 189 196 PRECINCT 125 382 17: 12t 167 153 234 90 239 54 174 124 140 157 PRECINCT 126 378 l 7 tJ 154 lo~ 167 216 124 256 o4 202 124 162 162 PRE:C I NC.T 127 445 2ll l 6" 16~ 213 258 131 307 61 246 119 215 154 PRECINCT 128 458 2li 182 177 2L2 264 136 313 78 255 134 l 17 197 PREC I NCT 129 481 221 19~ 175 250 295 133 3.33 78 250 159 217 187 PRE:C INCT 130 3 7 L., 19( 143 152 185 227 117 258 73 167 164 144 186 PREC INCT 131 414 is: 178 156 215 232 135 290 71 244 117 193 166 PREC I NCT 132 312 2li ll.O 18"1 151 L26 114 237 78 193 124 157 15" PRECINCT 133 478 171 19( 12 241 200 173 289 76 21Y 131 198 175 PRE:C INCT 134 383 19.: 132 151 172 230 94 245 68 178 135 151 17C PREC I NCT 135 396 2 lC 146 17t 179 259 105 270 77 201 142 169 174 PRE:CINCT 136 351 14~ 167 143 173 200 116 243 57 183 118 128 171 PRtCINCT 137 303 1 4~ 104 125 126 ld8 71 191 61 167 83 121 138 PRECINCT 138 529 241 218 22t: 233 323 154 364 81 2d5 174 235 226 PRE:C INCT 1.39 356 174 140 144 174 2.14 106 248 63 176 136 146 173 PRECINCT 140 290 14'i 105 13C 131 192 73 181 64 165 67 85 17C PREC INCT 141 329 16t: 115 147 131 217 73 204 67 163 109 102 l7C PREC INCT 142 405 22E 120 183 lo5 247 112 254 88 214 127 162 lf6 PREC INCT 143 322 l 7t: lCO 155 126 208 74 173 94 175 99 1.27 144 PREC INCT 144 332 lb~ 113 154 132 l9d 87 173 98 153 1L4 113 162 PRECINCT 145 339 179 118 l 3t: 160 l.19 83 193 91 187 99 142 142 PRE:C INCT 146 29~ 15L 99 107 153 168 89 185 63 149 99 1L2 131 PREC I NCT 147 4 13 21; 133 182 169 L60 92 222 112 211 127 loO 185 PRECINCT 148 435 23( 139 184 187 26L 108 268 89 203 158 162 199 PRECINCT 149 358 171 13~ 13 7 178 202 122 218 d4 189 114 130 17b PREC INCT 150 418 212 1-11 191 149 248 97 229 106 172 165 138 205 PRECINCT 151 372 171 110 169 121 225 72 194 78 145 128 121 165 PRECINCT 152 315 172 93 217 64 2!4 41 217 41 117 149 118 147 PRECINCT 153 400 23; 105 318 45 363 24 256 60 107 236 168 151 PRf:CINCT 154 312 17~ 89 237 41 i.74 27 191 53 90 179 109 141 PREC I NCT 155 246 14! 67 203 21 224 12 152 46 61 158 76 124 PRECINCT 156 331 1'15 94 2 :S~ 58 290 2.4 216 56 96 187 148 130 PRECINCT 157 376 201 11 7 259 79 322 39 240 61 117 208 133 165 PRECINCT 158 274 157 83 212 40 235 28 201 28 84 154 10 132 PRECINCT 159 419 21 ~ 148 2.0Y 162 2. 73 101 284 6L 221 133 163 2.04 PREC INCT 160 414 21( 155 178 186 263 99 2.60 94 220 133 139 220 PRECINCT 161 317 17~ 83 123 12 8 189 76 158 88 157 92 luO l5d PRECINCT 162 459 24~ 146 215 184 304 106 281 102 205 182 149 23& PRECINCT 163 313 l 7 ~ 103 138 144 200 92 202 71 153 122 114 162 PRECINCT 164 364 20~ 121 154 171 219 107 213 92 178 134 137 17S PREC INCT 165 188 8~ 66 86 75 106 51 119 35 87 61 7d 7~ PRECINCT 166 188 7i 69 6t 81 95 58 92 56 69 75 66 81 PRECINCT . 167 464 18! l8l 170 204 251 136 287 85 216 147 197 17& PRECINCT 168 338 l 6L., 10 1 124 145 169 101 173 d6 149 115 llC 150 PRECINCT 169 333 141 117 11~ 144 164 102 178 81 163 96 133 125 PRECINCT 170 374 142 128 113 158 188 79 188 12 159 95 130 126 PRECINCT 171 310 12! 83 103 104 12 7 75 133 60 118 71 93 1C2 PRECINCT 112 256 101 6~ 93 78 13d 38 123 36 99 62. 86 77 TOTAL SUP DIST 3 i 1027 7432 191J5 15362 l i019 ' 320 ~18C l b l 6d 8 73d l l.876 +06 l l945 =1 l 7 b STATEMENT o~ ALL vort~ CAST AT THt GE~t:KA L tltCT JON NOVE:M~EK 3 , 1970 PAGt 4t MEASUKl:S .5UBM ITTEO TO VCTE OF VOT ERS (C ONT.) T N N N N I\ I\ I\ I\ I\ f"t t'\ N 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 (. 0 G (J (J 0 T A L 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 v 0 T E c A y y y y y y s E N E N E N E N E N t: N T s 0 s 0 s G s 0 s 0 s 0 PRECINCT 173 280 1 0 7 89 85 11 7 108 9 1 102 90 100 93 77 119 PR EC INCT 174 27 8 129 93 104 11 7 153 72 137 82 119 97 7 8 144 ' PRECINCT 175 314 1 0 ~ 139 9 7 152 183 71 178 67 145 99 85 169 PREC INCT 176 3 48 18 4 12 5 146 171 33 83 202 113 172 142 95 217 PRECINCT 177 295 14( 117 123 132 189 69 183 t7 169 83 86 169 PRECINC.T 178 280 127 104 122 117 169 68 164 65 129 102 6 1 171 PRECINCT 179 325 1 2 ~ 135 92 1 80 l b3 80 197 6 1 156 102 78 180 PRECINCT 180 312 1 .2~ 108 1 0! 135 163 73 155 74 132 99 78 151 PRECINCT 18 1 404 1 81 16 t: 13~ 209 2.42 1 04 275 58 1 94 135 1 0.5 247 PRECINCT 182 246 12~ 94 98 12 1 163 52 158 51 138 76 77 141 PRECI 1\JCT 183 408 20~ 167 l 8t 190 257 118 2 1! 95 231 134 1L4 235 PKLCINCT 1 84 263 14~ 9( 12 1 112 169 b2 173 60 146 b4 86 148 PRECINCT 185 300 1 8~ 145 121 195 73 165 88 156 101 80 l7b PRECINCT 186 21E 14 ~ 101 13( 119 lbl 88 167 15 12 5 111 68 174 PRECINCT 1 87 223 111 72 83 1 01 140 47 1 34 48 lll 60 63 12S PRECINCT 188 232 9~ 8'1 94 90 133 49 114 65 10 l 77 46 132 PRf:CINCT 189 330 16 ~ 11 5 12i 158 204 78 184 92 158 117 83 186 PRt:CINCT 190 195 d~ 63 61. 82 1 07 42 96 53 8'J 55 62 87 PRECINCT 191 241 11( 79 1 04 90 144 46 141 43 12 1 62 77 12C PRECINCT 192 314 161 139 148 lSO 218 81 2 12 83 172 1L5 77 2 11 PJ{ECINCT 193 267 13( 108 l OS 129 167 69 163 60 149 62 65 161 PRECINCT 194 239 1 2: 82 97 1 07 1 50 54 130 71 117 79 64 134 PRECINCT 195 204 1 0~ 69 89 90 123 59 126 48 106 70 45 1 2 7 PRECINCT l 9o 75 21 32 23 3 7 35 22 34 24 .30 29 17 42 PRECI NCT 197 252 1 3~ 1 01 122 114 176 58 147 84 149 82 75 162 PR EC. lNCT 198 246 1 0~ 111 106 llo 157 66 152 64 1 2 1 93 67 152 PRECINCT 199 235 1 0 1 80 6C., 11 8 1 0 1 82 119 59 111 l9 58 121 PRECINCT 200 425 20- l7C lOl 188 263 127 295 85 ~21 160 141 246 P~ EC INCT 201 358 17 ~ 145 14t 173 243 84 260 60 194 lL3 115 203 PRECINCT 202 290 1 5~ 109 143 119 200 66 206 54 155 10 I 101 1 6 1 PK EC I NCT 203 212 122 71 10~ 8 7 149 45 145 43 109 74 69 123 PREC.I "4CT 204 249 14~ 86 1 2 1 10 7 164 63 171 49 112 108 88 13b PRECI NCT 205 123 71 3Lt 6 45 82 31 83 25 50 63 52 57 PREC INCT 206 1 57 5~ 62 42 77 dO 42 78 3.5 12 43 47 7 5 . TOTAL SUP DIST 4 9 198 1:3432 13749 23 15 b521 3136 2590 4416 4171 ti604 ~ 1 9 7 t570 :J2ll STATEMENT Gf ALL VJ TtS CAS T AT THE GE t\ ERAL E: LECTION NO V tM~EK 3 , 19 70 PA{,t: 47 MEA SUR1: ~ 5Ut:iM1 l TlD TO VC.TE Of VOT ERS CONT.) T N N t\ N t\ I'\' t\ I'\' t\ N ~ N 0 0 u (J (J (J G 0 0 0 0 0 0 T A L 3 3 4 4 ~ 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 v 0 T E c . A y y y y y y s E N E N t: N E N t: N E N T s 0 s 0 s (J s 0 s 0 s 0 PRECINCT 207 388 2 0 ~ 119 1 76 1S6 22.2 100 204 118 177 144 1 04 221 PRtC.INCT 208 2?0 134 98 151 91 150 81 149 73 117 108 88 135 PRECINCT 209 252 12C 77 1 09 94 1 06 91 13 2 68 90 103 58 145 PRECINCT 210 276 131 97 112. 126 160 77 147 89 121 i Od 73 1 5 2 PRECINCT 211 278 13.o! 108 129 117 150 92 153 78 118 112 8 l 164 PRtCINCT 212 258 12 ~ 73 133 7 8 149 6 0 140 65 117 84 88 112 PRECINCT 2 13 270 12 4 115 12 121 149 84 150 85 114 117 85 154 PRECINCT 2. 14 464 2 0 ~ 168 199 1 84 243 141 262 113 210 165 136 23S PRECINCT 215 30'1 12( 9t 8" 144 120 93 147 76 129 86 79 1 54 PRE:CINCT 216 3 15 1 3 ~ 83 122 106 133 78 128 94 119 94 87 132 PRECINCT 2 17 245 1 0~ 71 95 9C 119 59 112 61 106 69 67 10 6 PRECINCT 2 18 300 1 2 ~ 1 0~ 9t 142 161 71 139 88 137 94 73 155 PKECINCT 2 19 264 114 9 1 8'1 11 8 12.3 85 12.0 87 9 7 109 S6 152 PRECINCT 220 3 7 ~ 16 ~ 119 12c 166 1 84 1 04 183 100 lt9 119 127 163 PRECINCT 221 366 15( 14'1 145 160 199 10 5 236 6 7 158 143 103 204 PRE:CINCT 222 2 31 11 ~ 6 ( 11~ 77 128 52 116 54 99 67 77 l Cl PRECINCT 223 277 l Ot 105 1 04 11 8 148 76 165 48 1L5 93 89 134 PRECINCT 224 296 llC 125 94 143 113 1 29 164 73 115 123 103 138 PRECINCT 225 2 33 12 ~ 6 1 11 8 68 124 57 111 72 117 64 80 113 PRECINCT 2 2 6 245 13 ~ 57 134 67 1 35 55 131 63 113 11 72 12 4 PRECINCT 221 31~ 1 8~ 81 152 11' 1 83 85 158 109 146 122 79 192 PRECINCT 228 342 191 88 173 105 200 75 171 105 l S l 122 105 177 PRECINCT 229 2 85 14'1 76 134 94 149 74 144 77 115 9 7 74 146 PRECINCT 230 244 114 68 112 71 13 0 55 113 6 8 93 84 6 6 113 PRECINCT 231 252 120 76 120 72 146 49 1 22 6 8 114 75 72 1 24 PRtCINCT 232 238 10 7 0 99 79 114 62 114 64 109 o! 64 114 PRtCINCT 233 284 13~ 75 126 9 2. 162 59 114 91 124 80 81 132 PRECINCT 2.34 207 t) l: 4 8 82 58 99 35 94 3 6 82 51 53 S8 PRECINCT 235 2 58 l Ol: 82 l ca 84 123 63 116 68 ':J6 85 73 122 PRECINCT 236 258 14t: 67 143 76 1 39 74 l 3d 1 0 10 7 95 76 139 PRE:CINCT 237 253 13.i 67 12 7 82 140 70 1 27 6 5 11! 84 69 13 4 PRECINCT 238 341 182 112 152 1 51 177 122 2 15 88 138 162 82 221 PRECINCT 239 3 34 1 5~ 1 C8 l,j7 124 1 87 83 173 102 167 93 100 15 7 PRtCINCT 2 40 198 101 43 71 68 1 06 41 90 50 94 4 ! 6 1 81 PRECINCT 2.41 97 4 ~ 32 3 7 4 3 50 28 50 31 4 3 J l 23 54 PRE CINCT 2 42 252 13 ,; 74 14'1 75 l4d 63 147 66 133 17 80 13 1 PR ECINCT 243 113 46 23 4 ( 33 42 22 45 22 30 34 23 47 PRECINCT 244 29 11 9 10 11 14 7 17 5 8 1 2 6 15 PRECINCT 2 45 417 19 1 15 7 166 1 85 2 13 132 224 116 183 l 5d 138 2 1C PRECINCT 246 2 19 11 ii 12 96 93 1 24 63 116 62 102 83 70 116 PRECINCT 247 3 81 16 4 155 l 71 156 195 l.36 237 8 4 156 163 125 2 01 PRECINCT 2 48 353 18( 111 155 141 179 116 1 86 10 l 1 58 12.6 102 186 PRECINCT 2 49 313 1 6 7 106 132 142. 1 87 86 168 96 150 113 ,6 175 PRECINCT 250 318 16 ~ 107 147 130 175 96 180 89 13 1 125 91 177 PRECINCT 2 51 4 55 2 10 l 74 1 9C 197 233 153 2 5 5 115 180 190 128 256 PRECINCT 252 418 2 0 ~ 1 56 179 178 24 2 119 252 10 4 189 163 139 225 PRtC1NCT 253 502 26~ 167 2.2. 6 21 3 27 5 162 3 3 1 92 22 7 199 146 291 PREC INCT 254 253 12 Cj 100 111 120 1 65 63 139 78 114 108 6 1 162 PRECINCT 255 343 16 ( 136 l 3t 168 174 129 1 95 100 148 14 7 9L 2 13 PRECINCT 256 304 1 5~ 109 139 13 1 1 ~4 86 190 70 139 120 82 182 PRECINCT 257 141 Si 42 50 51 ~ 3 J 6 55 45 52 45 31 6b PREC.INCT 258 64 2i 18 15 30 3 7 8 26 18 3 1 15 16 ,j l PRECI NCT 259 252 1 3( 65 l 0 ti 92 129 66 120 74 100 t;9 59 135 PRl:Cl NCT 260 299 14( 88 1 21 11 7 146 80 142 83 120 l OL 62 16 4 PRECINCT 261 323 1 8~ 1C7 141 153 177 110 1 92 94 149 134 89 19; PRECINCT 26 2. 255 111 68 81 94 106 71 108 60 93 78 o5 117 PRECINCT 263 190 1 ~ 61 69 74 84 58 77 67 76 5J 45 102 PRECINCT 264 326 1 51 92 125 120 l"t7 90 1 35 103 12! 105 79 164 PRECINCT 265 260 129 5 1 136 58 127 5 7 113 70 119 64 1 0 1 69 PRECINCT 266 2 87 12 ( 76 111 88 130 6 7 115 82 114 81 78 118 PRECINCT 2. 67 78 22 30 26 26 2.0 3 1 29 2 1 3 1 18 25 26 TOTAL SUP DIST 5 1 69 66 5 428 7263 +772 3822 :4i84 t b33 Bl 2o 6558 38.13 t 5dl 7306 0794 STATEMENT Of ALL VU TE:5 CAST AT THE GE~l:KA L ELE:C Ti uN NO V EMaE~ 3, 1970 PAGE 4 t MEA !)UKE S SUdM 1 TTE:U TO VC.TE OF VOTt:RS (CONT. ) T N N N N r ~ f\ r r N r-. N 0 0 0 0 (, c c l G G 0 (J 0 T A l 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 v 0 T E c A y y y y y y s E N E N E: N E N E N E N T s 0 s 0 s G s 0 s 0 s 0 TOTAL SUP DIST 1 l 5223 5992 15592 ft.245 ~464 +8.23 :445 6355 694 8 8479 2696 7 341 5943 TOTAL SUP DIST 2 .; 0864 7146 17854 4850 l 533 )161 7 788 8970 8514 l 1744 +283 ~ 69 7 B2J4 TOTAL SUP DIST 3 .; 1027 7432 9 135 5362 l ~ 0 1 9 7 320 :3 180 l 01 6~ 8 738 l 12 8 76 1-061 ~ 9 4 5 9178 TOTAL 5UP DIST 4 9 198 3 432 374 ~ 123 15 55 21 ~ l 3b 2590 4416 4171 p604 219 / r+ ~ 7 0 5 2 11 TOTAL SUP OI5T 5 J 696f 5 428 7263 '4772 :3822 984 't833 8 1 2 ~ 6 558 d833 r+ 581 11306 ~7 9 4 SU B TOTAL S I 3278 2 9 430 3 l3 S93 2 1 544 4 d359 2 7 4 2 4 2 9836 3 803~ 3 4 9l 9 4 7S36 l 7 8 18 3 ti859 3 ~ 360 ABS ENTEE TOTALS 3747 1204 1 5 9~ 1085 2226 .442 12 42 1 802 1470 ~ 0 72 663 l 5 13 11 6 76 GRANO TOTALS I 7 025 . 0634 3 5 1 87 2 ~629 5 )585 2 :3 866 3 L0 78 ~ 3 fi83 7 3 6399 4 ~ 608 l 34 8 1 4 )372 3 ~ 036 STATEMENT OF ALL VOTE~ CA~ T AT THE GE~ERA L ELl: CT ION NOVEM8tK .3 , 1970 PAGt: 49 MEASURl: S SUBt"I I TT l:aJ Tl) VOTE: OF vOT t:RS ( CONT.) T N N " N " " t\ l"4 t\ "' N N 0 0 0 0 (J 0 {J 0 0 L 0 a 0 T A L 9 9 l l l 1 l l l l l l 0 0 l 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 v 0 T E c A y y y y y y s E N E N E N E N l: N E N T s ll 5 lJ s 0 s 0 s a s 0 PREC l NCT 001 297 lli 11 9 113 122 188 54 139 88 220 34 162 o7 PREC I NCT 002 325 14 i 108 1 29 12 4 201 59 14 1 110 24 6 i.9 159 93 PREC I NCT 003 292 l Ot 119 98 124 180 52 122 9 4 2 17 2t; 144 8 1 PRE: CINCT 004 371 1 3 ~ 134 lll. 153 195 89 167 104 268 4 6 153 103 PRECINCT 005 257 9~ 9t: YE 96 138 62 122 80 181 29 124 71 PRt:CI NCT OOo 33'1 1 21 10 7 lli 113 169 58 137 88 22 1 3 1 160 65 PRECINCT 007 2 5'1 14! 54 133 72 160 42 1 30 69 1H7 31 1 3H 62 PRE C,I NCT 008 33t: 1 5' 1 06 145 123 225 58 174 103 25L 33 176 l C,j PRl: CINCT 009 25t: 12 ; 92. 125 85 176 43 129 d8 200 3 1 128 81 PREC I NCT 0 10 4 25 1 6~ 152 164 171 261 83 201 136 3 15 56 2 13 120 PREC I NCT 0 11 4 0~ 20( 12E 1 91 146 261 77 223 108 322 35 229 9; PRE CINCT 0 12 386 18( 123 15 ! 142 251 o4 18 7 121 292 35 190 117 PREC I NCT 0 13 29t: 1 6~ d"' l 7 91 201 55 178 71 22.6 30 179 69 PRE:C INCT 0 14 2 72 13" 83 1 21 102 168 5 1 130 90 204 27 156 69 PRl:C INCT 0 15 422 23( 117 188 152 277 80 223 113 325 3 1 241 97 PREC I NCT 0 16 369 2 13 9 7 18( 12 7 256 59 2 19 89 287 39 232 7C PRl:CI NCT 0 17 280 14 ~ 76 13( 90 181 49 150 80 211 28 15 7 6 4 PREC I NCT 0 18 385 19"' 115 189 120 2 48 6ti 188 118 29.2. 4 0 2 16 83 PRE CINCT 0 19 463 225 129 l 8t: l 60 2 90 73 235 113 334 54 252 9 7 PREC I NCT 020 473 l 9j 190 1 84 1 8 7 30i 81 231 141 3 1 2 35 252 120 PREC I NCT OL l 340 16"' 116 168 11 2 225 68 183 98 2 13 3 7 2C4 74 PRlCI NCT 022 311 174 84 129 11 8 204 58 158 9 1 2.43 25 l 7 .'. 72 PREC I NCT 023 408 2 1S 117 179 163 2 76 68 206 132 338 35 253 'i3 PREC l NCT 024 406 186 162 1 6~ 169 26b 80 205 140 314 50 2 15 11.7 PREC INCT 025 72 39 27 3 (: L4 52 13 43 20 57 9 41 2 1 PRl:C I NCT 026 108 4 i: 39 45 39 66 28 55 34 8 7 8 63 26 PRf:C I NCT 027 362 201 117 1 94 1 2. l 239 86 196 114 305 30 2 19 95 PREC INCT 028 357 20.i 98 179 122 239 08 1 84 120 274 46 2 17 83 PREC I NCT 029 372 1 6~ llC 149 l lS 201 93 159 122 264 45 182 98 PREC I NCT 030 3 10 1 3~ 95 127 114 189 70 120 111 L47 29 158 77 PREC I NCT 031 388 19( 133 158 163 264 72 206 llJ 307 35 2 14 101 PREC I NCT 032 438 2 4c:i 125 l05 155 299 72 263 109 3L6 60 264 105 PREC I NCT 033 418 205 14( 1 91 150 287 65 l l O 128 2.96 63 236 106 PREC I NCT 034 386 2Ci 1 01 166 140 240 63 1 97 111 289 3 7 204 9; PRlC I NCT 035 302 9t 129 87 136 168 69 110 118 203 42. 120 97 PKEC I NCT 036 354 1 4~ 128 132 138 205 75 157 1 07 271 29 185 Be PREC I NCT 037 393 19C il9 18.3 l .30 239 88 19 5 118 301 39 221 dE PREC I NCT 038 335 125 13C 142 117 202 73 148 111 248 33 1 81 se PREC I NCT 039 364 16 t; 133 1 3 7 156 2 19 85 182 101 2. 7 d 35 l S l 9 7 PREC I NCT 040 314 l4t: 120 143 123 214 58 171 8 7 255 38 2.0 l 7 2 PR EC I NCT 041 419 2 2"' 139 205 153 266 100 2 19 144 341 4 4 262 101 PREC I NCT 042 2 12 90 68 61 94 1 .36 29 9 7 59 15 7 21 1L6 33 PREC INCT 0 43 360 173 11 5 173 1 2 7 227 7 5 180 117 2 70 46 200 81 PREC I NCT 044 307 162 82 123 11 8 178 7 2 152 82 l36 26 176 6 7 PREC I NCT 045 291 13( 103 138 9 1 191 54 147 9 1 223 3 1 155 7c . TOTAL SUP DI ST l l 5223 4 959 &534 12939 7 5o9 601 :33~1 7267 t:604 ~ o.33 t582 l 575 B7t;c . - STAT t:MENT OF ALL V O T t~ C A ~ T AT THE GENERAL t LECTICN NuVEM&ER 3 , 19 70 PAGE SC MEASUKES ~UBM 1TT EO TO VOTE OF VOT E:iS CONT . j T N N N N I\ I\ f\ N I\ N I\ N 0 0 tJ Ci 0 c c 0 G L 0 c 0 T A L 9 9 l l l l 1 l l l l 1 0 0 l l 2 2 3 3 4 4 v 0 T E c A y y y y y y s E N E N E N E N t: N E N T s 0 s 0 s 0 s 0 s 0 s 0 PRt:Cl NCT 0 46 287 90 119 86 122 143 66 1 03 10 1 185 44 107 96 PRECINCT 047 298 1 2 4 9 7 99 12 7 168 67 126 81 214 32 1 51 68 PRECINCT 0 48 207 102 59 75 79 128 4 0 96 60 15/ 17 lLO 44 PRt:ClNCT 0 49 2 70 77 103 60 121 116 68 11 98 185 21 116 65 PRECINCT 050 2 86 95 96 77 114 1 34 61 96 10 1 2U l 3 1 128 ~t . PRECINCT 051 192 6 ~ 51 59 60 79 38 6 5 5 1 122 16 85 34 PRE:CINCT 052 343 117 123 91 146 159 83 113 112 224 35 144 8c PRE:CINCT 053 320 130 1 08 99 135 177 70 134 100 224 41 166 70 PR ECINCT 054 267 11 ( 77 75 102 126 62 10 7 71 1B4 19 117 64 PRf:CINCT 055 178 6f 44 50 62 75 41 59 47 109 20 71 3 l: PRECINCT 056 215 7 ~ 59 60 81 117 3B B5 6 0 156 l b S2 46 PRECINCT 057 357 16( 103 141 1 3 1 2 12 66 163 99 258 32 172 9C PRECINCT 058 389 16~ 13 7 144 158 252 64 1 6 7 136 283 54 2. CG 106 PRECINCT 059 307 132 81 111 1 0~ 160 70 140 76 2 17 34 160 59 PRECINCT 060 275 1 2 ~ 79 l 01 99 158 56 129 78 194 39 142 6 1 PRE:CINCT 061 240 1 0~ 6 2 81 80 117 5~ 1 07 55 165 2.6 111 45 PRtCINCT 062 276 12i 78 1 0 7 102 164 51 12 7 73 200 2 1 140 68 PRECINCT 063 354 15( 119 1 31 137 2 10 73 166 10 2 271 33 1 &3 9C PRECINCT 064 297 14( 91 108 11 9 179 59 150 81 2 2 6 3 5 156 74 PRECINCT 065 226 9~ 63 86 78 128 51 97 60 162 l / 104 60 PRf:ClNCT 066 347 131 115 139 116 208 6 2 153 1 07 242 33 179 7B PRECINCT 067 354 1 8~ 9 2 1 57 119 226 6b 189 9 2 2 70 28 196 83 PRECINCT 068 364 190 109 l 6L 13 7 231 ~6 191 106 2 18 43 200 as PRE:CINCT 069 277 1 07 101 94 108 141 76 123 81 20b 26 124 7 2 PRECINCT 0 70 2 55 137 7 0 117 92 168 45 128 7 8 193 34 143 60 PRECINCT 0 71 325 119 123 132 100 209 52 126 107 228 3B 1 61 83 PRECINCT 0 72 282 11 (: 89 109 90 171 52 124 8 7 2 12 26 130 74 PHECINCT 0 73 338 1 5L 100 14C 11 5 198 62 141 102 257 Ll 177 65 PRECINCT 074 324 14S 114 121 l :S 0 1 84 82 1 55 100 239 3 7 162 S7 PRECINCT 0 7 5 241 Bl: 9 7 81 109 138 58 1 06 80 182 29 118 6 7 PRECINCT 0 76 257 9C 99 78 113 162 46 109 19 190 26 133 S; PRECINCT 077 3 04 11( 116 99 12 1 19L 48 141 84 224 31 l6L 6 1 PRtCINCT 0 1B 3 48 14i 108 139 11 8 202 74 167 95 2~ 1 35 176 7b PRECINCT 07 9 309 122 108 9( 139 1 84 67 128 104 i28 2 7 147 86 PRECINCT 080 338 12f 8~ 112 109 159 12 114 95 214 38 155 63 PRECINCT 081 2 7'1 l Oi 83 93 94 152 48 107 79 189 25 119 6 6 PREC INCT 082 249 7~ 80 63 9 7 115 54 87 6 5 163 29 111 46 PRECINCT OB3 2 21 7( 80 !: ~ 94 111 50 32 6 8 15 1 27 S6 50 PRECINCT 084 3 06 l Oi 93 89 104 1 51 56 93 94 l t38 35 120 71 PRECINCT 085 237 8C 99 71 106 141 4 d 96 80 165 30 1 01 7 5 PRECINCT 086 236 7 0 9 8 66 1 01 1 26 4 9 84 7 8 16 7 2B 105 6 1 PRECINCT 087 2 71 107 85 88 113 16L 5 1 110 8 4 196 28 1 27 76 PRECINCT 088 2 89 111 9 5 80 135 172 53 114 9 5 2 12 24 128 72 PRECINCT 089 258 97 1 01 d2 113 149 55 112 88 185 21 122 1 L. PRECINCT 0 90 288 i c~ 113 15 13 4 146 15 1 04 105 2 22 ll 1L5 82 PRE CINCT 091 302 102 12 7 88 139 158 76 105 124 223 34 131 101 PRECINCT 092 349 13 1 1 31 106 150 173 9 1 131 128 2 4d 4 0 165 10 2 PRE:CINCT 0 9 3 284 8 ~ 119 87 119 148 65 111 9 1 210 32 l ;j 1 7 5 PR ECINCT 094 4 0 5 141 150 14( 1 64 2 44 71 157 138 3 17 24 2CL 95 PRECINCT 095 477 2 3l: 18 1 2 1: 205 3 14 111 2 6 8 148 '3 79 ~9 270 141 PRECINCT 096 367 164 138 146 146 251 66 178 113 281 45 204 S6 PRECINCT 097 3d8 17 ~ 155 142 180 250 85 201 124 314 47 2Lb 9c; PRECINCT 098 2B4 lli 105 99 1 3 1 167 63 12 6 99 2 15 36 147 7 8 PRECINCT 099 2 94 12( 113 1 0~ 129 1 81 62 136 93 2 L2 Jl 1 5.2 8L PRECINCT 100 350 14t 12 6 13t 139 222 60 167 10 5 2d0 29 186 7 8 PRECINCT 10 1 3 50 14 ~ 123 1 31 142 206 11 1 52 114 260 37 l 8L 78 PRECI NCT 102 3 37 142 128 12 4 138 2 10 68 154 108 2.6 6 23 l b9 76 PRECINCT 10 3 366 17 ~ 135 172 132 242 76 175 12 / 292 36 19 4 105 PRECINCT 104 30 4 124 1 0 7 110 12 1 169 75 144 91 235 34 l S l 7 b PRECINCT 105 327 14~ 128 12( 1 5,.j 192 84 152 120 246 49 l ciO 96 PRECINCT 1 06 304 141 116 141 11 8 209 5 1 165 87 241 31 173 83 PRECINCT 107 323 145 121 135 13 C 2 16 60 162 102 L~2 35 166 95 PRECINCT 108 498 246 151 2 18 180 330 83 239 1 50 3 78 4 5 260 130 PRECINCT 109 399 195 128 177 l,j 1 2. 1 3 66 19 6 12 1 314 41 241 8 1 PRi:CINCT 110 355 1 5~ 132 119 171 2 21 75 164 119 2 74 40 201 84 PRECINCT lll 207 79 B3 71 84 109 56 9 6 66 150 25 106 52 PRECINCT 112 433 1 8 6 1 51 172 166 267 94 200 132 34 2 36 235 1 0~ PKEC l NCT 113 2B5 12 4 108 1 0 7 12.S 189 6 1 149 BL 221 3 1 158 71 TOTAL SUP DIST 2 ~ 0864 71 67 1743, !t-342 :J 119 ~ 1 8 1 1 J 4 34 I 8581 826 8 l 2141 4!7 l 3 3 ~! 51 S7 - - STATEMENT OF ALL VOTES CAST AT THE GENERAL ELECTION NOVtM BtK 3 , 19 70 PAGt 51 MEA~URt:S 5UBM I TTt:O ro VC.T E. uF VCJTt:KS ( CUl~ T . ) . T N N N N I\ I\ I\ I\ I\ N N N 0 0 0 0 l.J (, (. L 0 u 0 L (j T A L 9 9 l l l l l l l l l l 0 0 l l 2 2 3 3 4 4 v 0 T E c A y y y y y y s f: N E N E N E N E: N E N T s 0 s 0 5 G s 0 s u s 0 PREC I NCT 114 2 57 114! 9 CJ 118 100 162 60 127 85 200 J 4 141 73 PRE CINCT 115 410 19 1 110 172 12 4 244 79 1 91 108 3 11 35 2 12 7 8 PR ECINCT 116 3 0: 11 ~ 82 98 11 0 108 oO 1 02 101 213 36 130 11 PR EC INCT 117 383 2 1! 113 201 ll e 268 70 221 102 300 46 236 95 PRECINCT 118 403 22~ llo 2 12 129 2 70 80 239 104 .313 48 260 84 PRECINCT 119 289 12 J 108 112 110 1 83 51 1 27 99 2 18 2.7 150 74 PRECINCT 120 334 16 t: 113 146 12 8 226 56 170 102 263 32 171 1 0 1 PRECINCT 1 2 1 2 13 6 1 9~ 91 96 146 47 117 63 174 25 114 70 PRECINCT 122 157 6~ 6 ( 5~ 74 95 38 81 46 121 20 13 53 PRECINCT 123 432 20: 15( 1 91 16 1 2 78 87 2 15 130 334 44 2. ~ 2 1 21 PRECINCT 1 24 447 l 9 t 171 l 7 '4 1 95 305 H7 223 142 3 4 0 60 251 111 PRECINCT 125 382 17~ 1 2~ 14( 158 222 77 182 10 1 292. 34 l S2 95 PRECINC.T 126 378 21 ~ l O! l 9C, 12 4 266 12 2 12 114 l.9 7 41 233 t PRE CI NCT 1 2.7 445 23! 1 2 ~ 2. 23 138 320 5 7 242 126 3 42 51 265 as PRE:CINCT 128 458 2 4~ 14 ~ 2 o: 185 322 89 256 128 366 45 2 73 1 07 PRE:CINC.T 129 4 81 25 l 1 51 222 1 8 7 351 6 7 252 149 3 78 53 293 111 PRECINCT 1 30 3 7~ 1 8~ 146 l 7 ~ 146 2 70 7 3 2 18 109 307 42 228 92 PRE:ClNCT 13 1 41~ 211 14t 199 149 284 79 241 106 327 4 2 244 112 PRE:CINCT 132 372 15~ 156 1 31 175 2.30 95 185 12.7 305 3 1 2 C5 l OC PRECINCT 133 478 22 .I 138 1 94 160 287 87 226 131 353 4 3 2 46 113 PRECINCT 1 34 383 l 7 ~ 1 31 156 156 256 6 4 207 102 305 28 2 15 9 1 PRl:CINCT 135 396 1 9~ 144 l 79 1 64 279 78 2. 12 12 7 322 4 5 24 2 106 PRECINCT 136 35 1 1 5~ 141 146 142 258 50 19 4 9 7 288 30 193 99 PRE:CINCT 1 3 7 303 1 2~ 1 27 12 ~ 11 9 2 10 43 148 103 235 31 173 76 PR EC INCT 138 529 26~ 178 22~ 2 18 380 88 284 161 4 35 44 301 13 7 PREC INCT 139 350 16 4! 1 51 160 149 l45 76 2 09 10 l 2.96 3 6 198 l O; PRECINCT 140 290 101 150 93 155 200 59 121 125 2 45 26 148 1 0 1 PRECINCT 141 329 1 2~ 151 93 171 199 d4 146 123 263 36 155 110 PREC INCT 142 4 05 18 1 1 6 1 153 180 263 100 19 9 129 346 28 Ll4 120 PRECINCT 143 3 22 1 2~ 144 125 147 207 78 147 1 24 2.56 39 174 103 PR EC INCT 1 44 332 14 ~ 13C 126 152 208 75 135 134 2.58 40 166 l Oe PRECI NCT 145 339 13 i 135 117 16 1 2Ll 06 1 54 127 271 3 1 19 7 b6 PRECINCT 146 29 ~ 1 2~ 125 1 07 146 195 71 139 103 2.31 35 169 77 PREC I NCT 147 413 182 1 5 7 14.11 1 8CJ 246 109 1 93 139 306 51 2.10 125 PREC INCT 148 4 3 5 15 ~ 20~ 163 204 284 82 2 13 148 3 40 53 233 122 PRECIN CT 149 35 8 14 .ii 15'1 15 ~ 147 236 80 176 120 282 41 196 10 4 PRECINCT 150 41 8 1 64 1 64 141 1 97 245 9 8 189 136 337 38 201 115 PRECINCT 1 51 372 13 ~ 153 101 192 233 64 145 125 297 L4 176 l Gl PR ECI NCT 152 315 123 128 l Ol 146 2 19 4 9 152 9 4 254 24 162 91 PRECINC.T 1 53 400 163 1 51 105 205 291 44 19 1 . 112 3 16 29 2 18 72 PHEC INCT 1 54 312 109 13 1 6 ~ 169 2.2 1 3 4 138 86 238 20 1 57 6t PRE ClNCT 1 55 246 9 t 1 01 5 .Ii 133 179 28 112 8 2 19 1 20 138 52 PHEClNCT 156 331 14 :- 11 7 7 5 191 250 37 160 100 2. 1 8 14 1 87 77 PRECINCT 1 57 376 14 ~ 149 llo 190 2b0 47 173 1 21 287 38 179 1 06 PRl:ClNCT 158 274 121 1 05 68 150 202 31 173 56 230 15 1 54 64 PRE CINCT 1 59 419 21 ~ 147 1 83 182 298 73 232 122 3 40 4 0 2.51 96 PRECI NCT 160 414 17 ( 1 84 168 183 285 79 195 15 7 337 38 2 16 140 PRE CINCT 1 61 317 110 144 100 1 54 208 70 13 1 121 2 4 9 31 150 9 7 PRl:CINCT 162 4 59 1 7 ~ 21 5 1 6 1 228 326 74 2 14 163 3 77 41 232 145 PREC INCT 1 63 3 13 1 2~ 13 7 12 !: 147 2 19 59 149 lL8 L~O 42 172 101 PREC INCT 1 64 3 64 133 1 84 120 193 237 87 169 145 296 3 7 185 lL6 PRECINCT 165 188 86 65 7 1., 77 111 4 5 106 47 150 13 'i2 St PRtClNCT 166 188 6~ H l b~ 7 8 95 49 75 65 1 23 36 74 6 7 PRECINCT 16 7 4 6 4 23~ 13 7 206 165 289 85 2 2 4 145 343 52 241 1L3 PRE CINCT 168 338 11-l 144 113 139 1 94 70 129 132 2 ~ 0 40 133 120 PRECINCT 169 33 3 138 12 4 119 136 185 66 147 108 2 42 3 4 1 54 99 PRECINCT 170 374 145 llC 13 7 1 24 205 56 160 100 258 42. 177 86 PREC INCT 171 310 106 86 98 93 155 42 120 62 208 19 115 12 PRECINCT 17 2 256 97 59 84 80 120 55 86 15 l ij .2 24 109 51 TOTAL SUP DI5T 3 ~ 1027 78b9 8135 13956 l )274 ! 106 1 L2 14 ~233 d92'.J l ~ H2.;j 6 18 l 4 IL 6 64.;S STA T EME~ T OF All VG TE:S CA~T Af THE bE~E~A L ELECT I ON NOVEM8EK 3 , 1970 PAuE: 52. . MEA5URE.S 5UUM ITlE:O TO VOTE: Of- VOTtS (CONT .) T N N N N , (\ (\ I\ (\ N ~ N 0 0 u 0 0 G 0 c G c 0 lJ (J T A L 9 9 l 1 l l 1 1 l l l 1 . (J 0 l l 2 2 3 3 4 4 v 0 . T E c A y y y y y y s E N E: N E N E N E: N E N T s 0 s 0 s G s 0 s 0 s 0 PRECINCT 173 280 74 126 80 114 130 69 92 105 170 46 99 93 P~EC.INCT 174 278 96 125 96 12 4 158 67 118 103 198 43 133 SS PRtCINCT 175 314 122 128 12 4 12 1 177 72 143 102 241 32 114 115 PRE:CINCT 176 348 133 173 128 l8S 2 10 99 159 144 213 54 162 150 PR EC INCT 177 295 139 111 136 107 185 06 148 102 249 23 132. 116 PRECINCT 178 280 98 129 104 125 174 60 124 100 2.2 1 2J 123 10 PRECI NCT 179 325 138 115 134 124 166 ti8 1 54 10 1 2.43 35 118 139 PREC INCT 180 312 llE 113 100 124 150 80 125 98 234 25 127 1 01 PRE:CINCT 18 1 404 1 845 149 160 168 246 97 LlO 135 334 40 170 16 7 PRECINCT 182 246 11 'i '-J7 1 01 106 147 63 123 ao 190 33 110 102 PA.tCINCT 183 408 16( 200 185 l /4 2 73 86 206 l5L 342 42 206 14 PRECINCT 184 263 101 129 1 041 12 7 172 63 132 92. 2 18 28 132 96 PRECINCT 185 300 13( 12 .t; l OE 14:l 195 63 136 117 237 36 159 l CC PRE:CINCT 186 27 8 9l 142 93 14 J 177 64 118 llb 2 11 42 130 1C2 PREClNCT 18 7 223 1 2 11 ~ 7 ( 111 126 61 99 83 174 24 105 82 PR EC INCT 188 232 7 f:. 99 66 110 109 59 8 1 92 168 28 90 84 PRLCI NCT 189 330 11 ~ 159 l Ots 164 203 72 15J lLl 252 41 151 12.7 PRECINCT 190 195 1i 75 72 79 100 49 91 59 141 19 78 6 7 PRE:CINCT 191 241 9E 96 89 100 139 59 112 77 1 8~ 26 105 82 PRECINC.T 192 314 130 159 13S 152 2 17 70 178 105 2. 70 29 153 13 4 PRE:C. lNCT 193 267 104 11 9 108 11 5 167 54 128 97 2 l l. .3 5 118 107 PRE:CINCT 19 4 239 90 102 79 116 132 68 1 0 7 83 188 l.4 98 9 7 PR EC INCT 195 204 8 1 93 83 90 126 46 104 66 172 14 8d 84 PR EC INCT 196 75 26 32 21 3 7 3 1 25 30 30 50 12 30 21 PRECINCT 197 252 as 143 86 149 169 o2 115 115 2L4 19 123 llC PRE:CINCT 198 246 99 115 9 1 123 146 72 114 99 .200 2.5 110 105 PRtCINCT 199 235 &Li 9 7 77 l 01 130 49 91 88 lo4 3 1 80 94 PRE:CINCT 200 425 211 170 200 175 296 77 253 12 1 355 41 207 166 PREC INCT 201 358 18 1 136 180 128 256 62 208 99 298 30 180 130 PRECINCT 202 290 14.ii 114 134 126 199 61 152 104 l.42 30 145 116 PREC IN CT 203 2 12 105 87 87 102 147 41 121 65 l dli 16 11.2 75 PREC INCT L04 249 llt 108 115 1 0 7 168 58 146 76 213 ~o 124 102 PR EC INCT 205 123 56 55 52. 5 7 92 19 64 43 l l l. 7 82 28 PREC INCT 206 157 68 52 57 62 77 36 62 57 92 30 56 65 TOTAL SUP Dl~ T 4 9 198 3987 13!69 2137 t-397 i009 t l50 3733 4101 B590 i2.27 7 2.61 3507 ~ STATEMENT OF ALL VO TES CAST AT THE Gtf\ERAL ELECTION NOVcMBER 3 , 1910 PAGt 53 1_,tA SU~E S SUBM l TTEO TO VCTt OF VOTEiS ( CON T.) T ~ N N N f\ N N N I\ N N N 0 0 0 0 0 G -l,; c 0 G (., 0 0 T A L 9 9 l l l l l l l l l l 0 0 l 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 v 0 T E c A y y y y y y s E N E: N E N E N E N E N T s 0 s 0 s 0 s 0 ~ 0 s 0 PREC I NCT 201 388 119 196 126 1 91 223 103 152 166 299 50 154 1 5~ PREClNCT 208 270 96 123 96 129 15 7 71 132 88 2 16 3 1 139 85 PRE:C l NCT 209 252 8~ 116 7 8 126 133 74 86 105 17d 42 102 86 PRl:CINCT 2 10 2 76 7 ~ 1 47 / 8 149 163 72 109 llo .206 4 2 1 21 10 4 P REC I ~C T 2 11 2 78 10 l 132 96 143 185 63 124 105 2 11 41 134 10 4 PREC I NCT 2 12 258 103 102 98 99 136 68 109 92 1 8! 30 117 75 PREC I NC.T 2 13 27 6 9 1 1 51 1 0~ 130 176 69 124 113 217 31 1.26 113 PREC I NCT .214 4 64 l 6l 202 1 8( 1 9 7 2 77 102 198 174 34 2 64 2 46 1 27 PREC I NCT 2 1 ~ 30'4 9~ 13 1 d~ 139 138 86 102 118 .2 1 ~ 32 111 105 PRl:C I NCT 2 16 3 15 9~ 114 a-, 125 163 60 117 9 4 205 j6 l ~ ~ 8 l: PREC I NCT .2 1 7 245 7! 94 72 104 112 68 89 83 169 29 ;5 76 PREC I NCT 218 300 10( 12 E 82 144 162 77 100 1 2 7 l23 40 118 106 PREC. I NCT 219 264 8~ 131 8( 129 126 82 90 1 12 186 44 105 ; E PRtC I NCT 220 378 1 2~ 165 143 147 l Y 102 147 136 .200 51 169 1 17 PRE:C I NCT 221 3of 14 ~ 151 12 16 1 223 86 106 13 1 260 59 168 127 PREC I NCT 222 231 7 ~ 94 o~ 10 1 123 54 87 86 169 l.1 l Od 6 7 PREC I NCT 223 2 77 l 01 1 0~ 8E 12 7 166 5 7 109 104 208 35 120 95 PRf:C I NCT 224 290 1 3 1 1 OE 109 122 158 80 1 2 1 117 209 4J 1L2 108 PREC I NCT 2 2! 233 7 ~ 11 8 b~ 123 133 61 77 113 179 27 116 76 PREC I NCT 226 2 45 0; 111 8( 11 5 136 5 7 96 9 1 l d7 28 106 86 PRl:C. INCT 227 314 l OL l o2 l 0.1 170 1 81 80 13 1 1L9 24 7 30 1 3~ 12 7 PREC I NCT 228 34 2 1 2~ 153 111 170 195 75 13 4 139 254 4 2 133 140 PRt CINCT 229 285 1 141 as 130 140 85 120 92 211 34 115 98 PR:C INC.T 230 244 Sf 88 71 108 125 64 85 93 18d 18 107 74 PRE:C I NCT 231 252 8~ 112 8C 111 140 58 89 100 1 8~ 36 102 89 PREC I NCT 232 238 7L 103 53 123 109 65 85 85 l 71 iB 9d 7b PRECINCT 233 28 ~ 10.1 114 85 125 156 64 109 10 1 177 49 134 7S PREC INCT 234 207 1 ~ 62 6E 7 9 86 54 77 58 144 LO 65 69 PREC INCT 235 258 8L 111 7:. 1 14 116 74 97 92 1 8 1 39 99 95 PREC I NCT 236 258 b~ 11; 8~ 121 142 70 103 97 180 4 1 113 97 PR EC INCT 237 253 71 128 72 123 159 49 93 102 196 29 1L8 71 PRt:C INCT 238 34 1 12; 174 11 '- 182 2 l b 76 160 129 254 56 157 135 PRE:C l NCT 239 33 ~ 1 0~ 14i 11 ~ 142 182 84 125 12 1 24 3 45 lj6 114 PRE:C I NCT 240 198 5; 83 4C 106 113 40 60 73 149 2 1 78 62 PREC I NCT 24 1 97 3.1 41 3(: 4 2 48 28 32 42 63 13 43 29 PREC I NCT 242 252 9~ 11 ~ 9C 122 161 55 106 104 200 25 114 92 PREC I NCT 243 113 3C 35 3 .11 3? 48 21 37 3 1 6 1 14 42 26 PREC INCT 244 29 ~ 15 ~ 12 12 11 7 14 20 4 13 9 PREC I NCT 2 4 5 417 1 61 179 1 5~ 1 86 256 100 194 143 307 5d 2 11 122 . PRl:CINCT 246 2 19 8 100 7C 115 117 73 85 98 17 lb 110 75 PRl:CI NCT 2 47 38 1 1 5.i 1 6 7 16 1 168 237 90 184 138 298 48 18 1 145 PRE:C I NCT 2 4 8 353 1 2~ 158 132 l !5 1 87 110 146 138 261 59 152 138 PREC I NCT 249 3 13 103 166 95 171 200 76 1 24 141 237 50 152 ll t PREC INCT 250 3 18 11 ~ 1 51 113 153 196 78 126 136 249 38 146 119 PRE CI NCT 25 1 455 139 232 1 5 1 224 265 122 187 183 350 59 192 176 PREC INCT 252 418 155 20C 14b 214 247 116 199 16 1 339 45 209 155 PREC INCT 253 502 197 2 3 .t, 201 2 1 8 j07 134 232 119 3 11 82 256 16 4 PREC INCT 254 253 9i 124 9t 125 1 70 62 102 11 5 193 39 116 100 PREC I NCT 255 343 13.!i 162 1 2~ 173 211 99 159 132 255 59 169 124 PREC I NCT 256 304 9( 170 112 153 195 78 120 135 249 31 15 1 109 PREC I NCT 257 141 29 66 3-4 65 66 35 46 52 93 22 54 40 PREC I NCT 258 64 l C 37 11 33 33 17 19 2.6 49 6 .t.1 22 PRt Cl NCT 259 252 7 1 122 74 121 126 74 109 7 8 184 32 '75 '7C PREC I NCT 260 299 8~ 132 8~ 150 153 83 102 11 2 2 13 40 117 102 PREC I NCT 26 1 323 11 ~ 169 l l C 177 201 90 149 132 253 46 144 138 PRE:CINCT 262 255 7 ~ 102 71 106 134 60 7 9 92 174 32 77 l CO PREC INCT 263 190 4 ~ 89 45 92 96 ~4 58 72 l l. 5 2.9 62 6S PRE CINCT 264 326 1:. 171 1 0 1 14 4 159 91 105 13 1 231 35 114 1L4 PRECI NCT 265 260 11 ~ 17 86 98 137 61 10 7 /4 167 43 119 71 PREC I NCT 266 287 93 97 7 5 11 5 133 60 9 1 96 19 l 32 1 l c; 78 PREC I NCT 267 78 32 25 23 29 30 l 'i 3 1 l ij 39 17 24 2'1 TOTAL SUP DIST 5 l c966 7662 15556 4327 E 739 2260 741C 5760 7901 9470 45.! 1 ~460 5895 OTAL SUP DIST l TOTAL SUP DIST 2 TOTAL SUP DI ST 3 TOTAL SUP DIST 4 OTAL SUP DIST 5 SUB TOTALS ABS ENTEE TOTALS GRANO TOTALS STAT EMENT OF ALL VOTE:5 CAST AT lHL 6l:NEKAL ELECTION rOVEMBtR 3 , 1~7 G HtA5URtS SUBM ITTEU TO ~CTE: OF V C TE~5 (CUNT.) T 0 T A L v 0 T E c A s T 5223 0864 1027 N 0 9 y E s 267 581 233 N 0 9 N 0 4959 7167 7869 9 198 3987 133 6966 7662 76 3278 31644 3 57 3747 1277 1565 7025 921 3 139 N 0 1 0 y E s 534 435 8135 56~ 555 312.29 N 0 1 0 N 0 604 d268 8929 101 7901 3 d03 12d0 1540 32509 3 343 1 l f\ G l l y E s 633 141 823 590 476 0" 1 l N c 939 342 3956 137 327 17701 5 663 662 319 18363 5 982. l c" l 2. y E s 569 119 274 397 739 3 098 r c l 2 582 457 6 18 221 455 2 339 791 076 3 889 2 415 l l l "0" l 3 '( E s 57! 35~ 472 261 l 406 6 129 894 6 02.S N 0 l 3 N 0 601 181 106 009 260 157 .321 484 l l ~ 0 l 4 y E: s 3Ll 434 Ll4 150 410 4 59 N 0 1 4 N 0 786 197 643 507 895 2. 0.28 646 167 4 175 2 195 PAlI: 54 . ~ T A T EMENT OF All VO l L~ CASI AT THE GENERAL ELEC TION NUVl:MBEk . ~ , 1970 PAGt 55 MEASUkt5 SUuM ITI ED TO VCTt o ~ VOTtKS (CUNT . ) T N r~ N N " I\ I\ N I\ N N N 0 0 0 0 0 c c c G 0 u (J 0 T A l 1 l l l l l 1 l l 1 2 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 0 0 v 0 T A E G A c l A y y y y y F N s E N E N E N E N E: N 0 s T s 0 s 0 s 0 s 0 s 0 K T PREC INCT 001 297 152 66 135 74 180 50 13 7 128 193 4 5 148 104 PRECINCT 002. 325 155 83 141 94 185 6 1 1 24 1 57 200 5 1 1 6 7 99 PREC.I NCT 003 292 130 84 112. 1 02. 156 6 1 128 12 7 162 59 152 86 PREC I NCT 004 3 71 163 89 l4t 96 1 87 70 116 195 19 4 66 16 7 114 PR lC INCT 005 257 132 56 1 2 1 64 151 38 114 112 1 51 44 140 66 PRE:C I NCT 006 334 145 64 1 24 88 158 65 1 34 1 33 1!9 56 163 75 PREC I NCT 007 2 5Li l b( 4 0 12 7 68 173 27 1 21 115 17 l 3 7 127 8i PRE CI NCT 008 336 l 9C 7 5 1 61 98 2 15 51 173 12.8 206 63 168 119 PREC I NCT 009 256 1 3~ 68 114 8 1 152 54 118 120 159 57 13 1 96 PREC I NCT 0 10 4 25 234 94 2 11 108 265 66 249 132. 274 73 2.38 1 21 PREC I NCT 0 11 403 2 4 i 71 225 91 2.67 5 7 2.29 140 2 78 63 2 12 136 PREC I NCT 012 386 21 ~ 76 178 109 2 40 58 205 145 257 ~ 4 188 135 PREC I NCT 013 296 l 7 ' 55 1 67 65 207 42 106 108 198 45 149 112 PREC I NCT 0 14 2 12 l 6l !b 1 5C od 190 40 164 82 l ~O 32 1 5 ~ 83 PREC I NCT 0 15 422 24 88 228 92 27 0 64 260 130 289 70 2. l.4 144 PREC INCT 0 16 369 23~ 70 2 19 81 259 4 8 223 113 2.62. 4 8 201 llb PREC I NCT 0 17 280 1 5~ 5 7 1 61 55 183 38 146 102 l d 7 34 140 103 PREC INCT 0 18 385 223 72 208 7 5 242 55 203 141 L1 49 LlO l 1 2. PRECINCT 0 19 463 26~ 81 236 9 7 283 73 269 147 294 73 266 130 PREC INCT 020 473 25 ~ 110 L23 128 2 79 99 2 14 217 2.9 2. 1 01 2 4 8 16C PREC INCT 021 3 40 206 62 1 8! 84 238 43 168 14 5 241 47 190 106 PRECINCT 022 311 19 1 50 179 65 205 41 190 8 7 1 94 !5 1 83 82 PRECINCT 02.3 408 2.65 76 237 95 286 53 256 133 2. 13 66 230 1 3 1 PRE CINCT 024 406 24 2 87 217 101 2o3 68 239 139 212. 08 -'25 lLt l PRf:CINCT 025 12 4 l: 1 5 42 18 52 11 4 5 2.6 5 1 7 49 16 PREC I NCT 026 l Od o2 24 56 29 73 13 52 49 70 17 52 47 PRE CI NCT 027 362 231 70 2 10 9 1 246 65 190 1 .5 1 2!9 62 l ; 2 12.9 PREC l NCT 028 357 23S 62. 2 13 8 1 241 64 190 143 2. 49 53 1S2 l 2C PREC I NCT 02.9 3 72 20C 71 176 b5 2.20 57 1 24 192 2 2.l. 5 7 178 11 PREC INCT 030 3 10 1 65 64 1 4~ 85 1 9 1 45 141 132 19 7 49 150 103 PRECI NCT OJ l 388 2 1'.l 87 202 100 234 77 199 147 266 59 22.3 l OS PREC INCT 032. 438 2 73 8 '4 2 5'? 98 2.93 72 2. 64 140 300 73 ~ 3 1 14(; PRE CINCT o~.j 41 8 261 71 244 12 213 68 2 16 165 2.80 74 2 12. 15 1 PRE CI NCT 034 380 232 69 2 13 83 2 4 0 55 235 114 253 64 175 14S PREC INCT 035 302 12 1 as 1 01 103 1 54 59 1 24 12.7 167 64 l l.5 117 PR EC I NCT 036 354 18l 76 1 6l: dS 208 58 177 133 2.22 5 1 187 99 PREC I NCT 037 393 2 16 86 201 97 242 75 18Es 156 2.60 57 l ob 158 PR l:C INCT 038 335 16 4 80 145 98 195 56 141 14 195 70 l .;8 1 3C PREC INCT 039 364 20.t. 75 188 93 2 16 70 159 169 234 .58 17u 13 1 PREC I NCT 040 3 14 2 1( 55 1 8 1 72 2.21 49 1 91 100 2.34 33 174 99 PRECI NCT 0 41 4 19 27 ~ 76 24 3 111 2.82 76 2 18 169 289 77 21 164 PRECINCT 0 4 2 2 12 11 ~ 33 1 04 4 6 123 31 102 82 1 27 32 99 12 PR l:C INC.T 0 4 3 360 1 9 ( 79 185 85 225 64 196 144 2 46 55 l '15 122 PREC INCT 0 44 307 18( 5 7 171 6 4 195 4L 106 10 7 196 4d 178 83 PREC INCT 0 4 5 291 16t 6 1 145 7 3 1 77 4 7 1 ~ 4 111 189 51 152 96 . TOTAL SUP DIST l l 52"3 l:Sl1 4 t7 801 2476 78 18 ~46 7 7887 ~680 B777 f:)535 '5 8 75 i8d0 1502 1 - STATEMENT UF All VOTLS CA~T AT THc Gt~EkAL ELECT l uN NUV~M OER 3, l 97C PAGt 'c 1"\ t A SUKl 5 SUBM I TT fO TO VOTE: OF VOTt:RS ( CuNT . ) T N N N N N N t\ N t\ N N N 0 0 u 0 u c (J L G c L u u T A L l l l l l l l l l l L. 2 5 5 b 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 G 0 v 0 T A E G ' A c I A y y y y y F N s E N E N E N E N E: N u s T s 0 s 0 s 0 s c s (; R T PRECINCT 046 287 112 86 88 103 136 69 107 127 133 7 5 117 94 PKECINCT 0 47 298 14C 71 123 74 156 56 1L8 115 16i 60 149 85 PRECINCT 0 48 207 111 40 103 50 1 27 27 126 53 131 2.6 109 62 PRECINCT 049 270 10( 65 103 63 123 52 106 105 117 61 110 81 PRECINCT 050 286 111 69 105 75 125 60 98 130 121 73 116 94 PRECINCT 051 192 7 J. 38 72 40 86 28 74 oO 83 31 72 52 PRECINCT 052 343 12 (j 9 1 117 103 146 77 131 136 153 69 114 120 PRtCINCT 053 320 17] 62 143 83 177 56 155 118 18.l 6b 151 102 PRECINCT 054 267 12 48 111 65 135 47 119 i37 126 5 1 132 63 PRECINCT 055 178 6t 33 6G ,j 7 73 24 64 62 71 29 70 43 PRECINCT 05b 215 10( 38 87 46 111 35 123 56 116 32 95 63 PRECINCT 051 357 177 79 161 87 180 73 156 152 201 70 lt7 11. PRECINCT 058 389 2.1? 86 l 8 J. 1 07 224 80 189 153 231 78 186 13S PRECINCT 0?9 307 15 56 13' 6S 174 42 166 86 176 46 13'1 93 PRECINCT 060 275 15: 53 121 73 176 36 151 88 166 47 139 83 PRECINCT 061 240 l OS 47 97 51 120 40 116 77 lL5 36 l CO 71 PRECINCT 062 2.76 15~ 50 13 / 58 167 34 145 92 lt9 41 119 94 PRECINCT 063 354 19~ 67 162 91 212 54 189 126 208 72 204 101 PRl:CINCT 064 297 182 46 155 58 183 43 188 11 1 81 53 159 86 PRECINCT 065 226 112 41 9 7 55 llo 41 103 63 132. 40 94 70 PRECINCT 066 347 186 b2 165 11 201 51 180 118 204 64 164 113 PRECINCT Oo7 354 2 OS 62 199 dO 240 43 207 114 234 51 184 110 PRf:C INCT 068 364 217 71 1 89 86 232 56 1 84 142 242. 48 166 136 PRECINCT 069 277 122 70 115 75 141 58 110 128 l~l 5 7 1C4 106 PRECINCT 0 70 255 140 61 12.5 b6 148 46 108 118 l 5 7 '49 117 92 PRECINCT 071 325 157 76 138 93 173 67 149 132 180 66 144 11 5 PRECINCT 0 72 282 126 69 117 7 8 154 51 128 114 160 48 137 86 PRE:CINCT 073 338 171 60 157 7 8 190 52 163 130 205 50 152 111 PRECINCT 0 74 324 lo E: 85 146 99 170 7 8 157 131 199 63 148 125 PRECINCT 015 241 12E: 5 1 l OJ 69 140 45 127 92 14 ~ 49 107 88 PRECINCT 076 257 129 59 120 b5 145 44 109 109 162 33 14L 63 PRECINCT 07 7 304 l oS 50 141 t7 166 52 136 117 176 47 135 10 7 PRECI1 CT 0 78 348 l 7C 73 1 57 84 202 50 l t4 126 208 53 168 108 PKtCINCT 079 309 153 64 131 90 168 60 153 109 167 65 141 106 PRE:C INCT OdO 338 133 69 126 70 144 60 150 10.5 161 5 1 145 ti5 PRECINCT 08 1 . 274 122 65 11 ~ 59 147 43 135 85 165 28 lL2 80 PRECINCT 082 249 91 58 1 '-J 61 128 40 118 75 117 so 98 6; PRECINCT 083 221 92 53 8 7 57 98 53 99 74 113 41 102 6 1 PRECINCT 084 306 118 62 100 77 126 59 l.33 96 140 47 140 6 7 PREClNC.T 085 237 llC 64 8t: 74 129 45 127 79 145 33 1L8 !8 PRECINCT 086 236 104 53 8 7 7C 116 48 105 90 10 I 59 98 82 PRE:ClNCT 087 271 130 60 109 80 139 59 112 116 ltO 4 5 126 89 PRE:CINCT 086 289 136 63 116 79 150 57 133 107 160 50 132 95 PRECINCT 089 258 135 51 117 67 142 48 100 114 148 50 120 95 PRECINCT 090 288 129 73 106 95 144 68 128 116 15? 60 140 as PRECINCT 091 302 11 8 103 118 98 150 73 120 138 155 74 153 98 PRE:CINCT 092 349 16 i 88 13d 107 176 80 145 155 191 74 169 116 PRECINCT 093 284 1 2~ 68 1 04 8b l 51 43 109 129 153 49 118 93 PRtCINCT 094 405 185 95 l 6 _, lOCJ 225 71 190 159 221 77 198 122 PRECINCT 095 477 29G 113 256 141 331 86 239 ll2 343 80 280 152 PRl:CINCT 096 367 225 69 1 93 95 247 54 2.01 135 l.65 48 2.Ll 108 PRE:CINCT 097 388 228 92 2 12 102 261 69 211 154 L1b 6! 200 14; PRELINCT 098 284 150 65 142 12 166 47 12 1 13L 18 1 43 154 85 PRECINCT 099 294 163 59 131 86 174 56 146 111 175 59 153 c;4 PRECINCT 100 350 191 68 l 72 75 214 55 179 135 225 59 178 117 PRECINCT 101 350 1 80 74 157 90 185 80 156 1:8 205 12. 171 1 L-.~, PRE.CINCT 102 337 180 76 152 102 209 57 171 130 215 54 180 l OL. PR EC INCT 103 366 206 85 189 93 22.4 69 1 6~ 172 232 71 171 138 PRECINCT 104 304 15 ~ 6 7 135 87 169 57 150 115 190 !: 2 143 106 PRECINCT 105 327 177 92 155 102 184 86 166 ll9 215 5d 18L 101 PRt:CINCT 106 304 185 63 1 80 69 212 39 172 114 215 41 171 101 PRECINCT 10 7 323 190 66 184 73 219 40 154 136 215 52 l ; 5 93 PRECINCT 108 49 8 289 96 2S2 118 317 76 250 197 330 79 263 157 PRECINCT 109 399 239 77 Ll8 89 2 70 56 22.2 141 2.76 57 L39 102 PRECINCT 110 355 17 7 97 16; 99 227 55 167 158 l.21 66 18 1 120 PRECINCT 111 207 103 47 98 54 118 38 73 106 120 37 113 6C PRECINCT 112 433 235 96 213 1 0 7 2. 15 68 238 153 287 67 2L2. 137 PRECINCT 113 285 148 15 139 81 170 64 131 135 183 52 1 67 7 ; . TOTAL SUP 01sr 2 ~ 0864 4 581 9375 13726 ~931 3705 l )l.i4 l b571 15427 l L754 :3024 l 2240 ~60 l STATEMENT OF ALL VOTES CA~ T AT THE GENEKAL ELECTIGN NOVtM8E:R 3 , 19 70 PAGl: 5 7 MEASURE!: SUdM ITTl:O TO VOTt OF VOTER!: ( ClJNT. ) T N N N N N t\ f\ r. f\ N N N l) 0 0 0 0 L 0 L G 0 0 0 0 T . A L l l l 1 l l l l 1 1 L. 2 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 ~ 9 c 0 v 0 T A E G A c I A y y y y y F N s E: N E N E N E N I: N 0 s T s 0 s 0 s 0 s G s 0 I{ T PR EC INCT 114 257 1 3 7 68 123 78 152 64 114 122 18 1 44 1.29 100 PRECINCT 115 410 21( 80 199 79 228 54 166 192 244 60 19.l 13 1 PRECINCT 116 304 133 61 117 66 143 50 10 l 144 170 33 127 8 7 PRECINCT 117 383 23~ 83 217 108 270 57 205 156 2d6 49 203 141 PRECINCT 118 403 26~ 65 249 dO 290 42 230 142 288 55 21 1 138 PR EC INCT 119 289 15 60 119 95 l o3 57 135 126 178 53 147 9C PR EC INCT 120 334 19 .i; 71 171 92 208 63 152 153 22 l 4Y 175 llC PRECINCT 1 2 1 213 1 21 52 111 66 148 3 7 96 109 148 41 122 6; PRl:CINCT 122 1 57 84 38 ot: 53 94 28 56 86 102. l.9 7b 59 PREC INCT 123 432 2 41 100 2 13 ll. 8 2b2 68 2 16 190 280 71 246 13S PKl:CINCT 124 447 26( 88 249 101 3 15 58 243 178 303 79 218 122 PRE:CI NCT 125 382 20i 82 1 91 82 234 55 201 147 233 / U 207 113 PRECINCT 126 378 24E 69 2 15 95 266 5 7 201 154 2 75 53 L.32 l OS PREC INCT 1Z7 445 2 7 t 6 1 2 41 96 288 59 225 178 3 12 52 268 llS PRECI NCT 128 458 29i 81 2 72 100 3 19 60 23 1 197 3 19 e5 27d 126 PRl:CI NCT 129 481 3 O: 82 2 13 120 345 61 285 161 3 45 70 21 e 155 PREC INCT 130 37.i; 24i 62 2 1 ( 94 251 6 1 224 132 268 ~3 2.:3 1 24 PRECINCT 1 31 414 26~ 80 230 110 290 63 228 1 57 302. 56 265 100 PRt:ClNC.T 132 3 72 232 70 l 83 113 244 56 195 153 261 o2 2 19 117 PREC INCT 133 478 25~ 88 2 1~ 11 8 266 84 206 214 296 64 200 180 PRECINCT 134 383 239 6 7 208 88 263 So 185 16 1 258 58 2 15 114 PREC I NCT 135 396 250 93 221 111 287 57 208 168 301 50 234 1.28 PR EC1NCT 136 351 221 65 192 90 237 56 18 1 154 260 4 2 194 12 1 PR EC INCT 13 7 303 1 81 63 165 75 193 53 144 136 196 ?8 174 96 PKECINCT 138 529 32.l 1 04 300 125 360 77 288 203 38L. 67 3 18 157 PREC INCT 139 356 22( 79 188 114 258 57 160 167 211 37 230 c; 6 PR EC I NCT 140 290 160 7 5 12t 10 7 185 5 7 142 133 193 58 165 105 PR EC INCT 141 329 16 88 146 1 04 l 9b 58 156 147 219 55 189 l OC PREC I NCT 142 405 22E 9 4 193 119 261 6 7 203 176 270 65 238 125 PR ECINCT 143 322 16 97 143 118 188 86 139 155 200 12 178 106 PREC INCT 144 332 18 .i: 83 1 5.i; 109 2 10 60 135 168 206 71 169 116 PREC INCT 145 339 182 93 1 53 119 209 69 143 166 2j3 53 185 1C7 P REC I ~C T 146 2 9 .i; 1 6~ 74 141 92 190 51 138 139 195 56 179 91 PREC I NCT 147 413 23; 93 204 122 249 86 201 177 266 8 1 L.41 125 PREC INCT 148 435 251 9 7 205 13 7 2 75 82 186 211 294 71 32 146 PRECI NCT 149 358 2CE 84 192 103 228 71 154 1/7 24 0 6~ 17d 144 PRE:C INCT 150 418 220 88 175 126 241 78 198 176 268 71 21 1 2,j PR EC INCT 1 51 372 lol 116 147 116 201 11 189 138 233 57 202 103 PRtCINCr 152 3 15 201 45 1 57 8 7 223 36 225 70 l.16 44 2 12 76 PREC INCT 153 4 00 23 i 40 2 18 72 260 38 3 47 36 263 59 291 l b PREC I NCT 154 3 12 178 3 4 149 66 201 30 262 3 7 l.02 47 207 6e PRE(. I NCT 155 246 14E 35 135 49 162 30 2 10 25 165 41 178 49 PR EC I NCT 156 331 2 11 4 0 181 75 231 32 281 37 228 54 22 81 PRE CINCT 157 376 227 50 193 85 258 34 3 13 44 241 72 25 9 1 PREC INCT 158 274 193 26 16.3 54 193 3 1 234 28 1 9.:J 36 193 56 PRE:C INCT 159 419 28~ 71 251 95 299 65 251 140 312 5o 2.66 llC PRE:CINCT 160 414 22~ ll.4 20? 13 7 251 9 7 189 l9b 285 70 240 13 1 PR EC INCT 161 317 1 5( 9 7 130 106 l d7 60 122 173 204 5? 15c 115 PRECINCT 162 459 247 121 222. 141 293 8 1 244 177 32.~ 64 268 13t PRECINCT 163 3 13 172 'i4 15( 112 1 '}9 71 151 150 222 58 1H5 111 PR EC INCT 164 364 l 8t: 118 157 141 223 90 15 7 192 262 55 203 134 PKEC I NCT 165 188 97 4 o 8b 59 126 26 7d 93 125 2 7 10 1 64 PRECI NCT 166 188 7" 51 5e 71 93 . 47 67 101 97 50 62 71 PRE:CINCT 1 6 7 464 248 106 2 16 132 281 80 19 1 227 289 71 2J9 14.3 PR EC INCT 168 338 142. 99 126 120 182 72 108 179 194 65 160 10. PR EC INCT 169 333 153 88 122 116 1 81 66 134 155 189 63 l o4 111 PRE CINCT 170 374 1 51 95 144 106 200 58 153 l Sd 2. 10 50 l i:l l 98 PREC INCT 171 3 10 117 56 1 0 7 60 128 49 118 128 l'tO 40 139 65 PRECI NCT 172 256 10 7 4 0 97 ?C 129 35 10 1 10 4 144 26 lL.l 64 TOTAL SUP OISf 3 4 1027 4476 l 0400 13460 l 0802 3L98 l 1 ~f:70 l !1908 5795 l l:S327 ~493 1 +030 5387 -- STATEMtNT UF ALL VOTLS CAST AT THL GENEKAL lLECTlON NOVEMBck 3 , 1970 PAGL Sb MEA~URl:5 5UBM ITTl:O TO VCTl OF VOTl:KS (CONT . ) T N N N N I\ N I\ I\ N I\ N N 0 0 0 0 L c L L 0 (; lJ (J 0 T A L 1 1 l 1 1 l 1 1 l l '- 2. 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 c 0 v 0 T A E b A c I A y y y y y f N s E N E N E N E N E N 0 s T s 0 s 0 s 0 s 0 ~ 0 R T PREC INCT 173 280 1 0~ 90 88 99 110 76 72 156 1.20 73 105 96 PREC INCT 174 278 1 2~ 84 114 94 151 66 90 15 7 152 64 123 106 PRECINCT 175 3 1~ 1 3~ 102. 1 3.2 94 172 67 116 156 173 74 150 102 PRl:C I NCT 176 348 16i 142 1 5.:3 1!3 212 94 160 lb8 236 74 201 115 Pf{tCIN CT 177 295 1 31 llC 138 103 186 63 144 127 .20 l 51 171 86 PRl:C INCT 178 280 1 01 11 i 102 115 149 75 110 14! .202 40 159 86 PREC I NCT 179 325 11 ( 1 2~ 13_ 11 0 169 7 9 1 2~ 149 195 62. 167 96 PRECIN CT 180 3 12 11 ~ 92 115 89 147 71 130 123 166 54 149 85 PR EC I NCT 181 4 04 17 ~ l 5t 21.r: 112 L52 85 192 177 268 76 2 2:4 l3c PRtCINCT 182 246 10: 9t 12( 76 159 43 108 118 l o5 41 132 89 PRf:C INL.T 183 4 0E 20! 143 211 136 269 86 18d 200 306 64 243 134 PREC I NCT 184 263 1 2~ 9t. lli 99 170 5 7 104 143 16; 5~ 143 l OC PREC INCT 185 300 14] 11 ~ 13; 113 l t5 71 130 146 206 56 1&3 89 PRECINCT 186 2 18 14( 9c 121 11.2 1 ~5 83 9 7 153 194 47 134 110 PRtCINCT 187 223 8~ 9~ 1 o~ 8C 143 41 94 108 147 41 112 8 1 PRECINCT 188 232 &~ 81 Bt 82 111 64 86 115 1 2.5 57 109 79 PRf:C I NCT 189 330 14! 123 14 ~ 125 202 71 140 160 2 13 69 180 116 PREC INCT 190 195 71 63 7C 69 95 50 75 84 111 3o 85 65 PRf:C INCT 191 241 11 ~ 7'1 l l l 76 140 47 105 106 152 40 1 .2 1 76 PRECINCT 19.2 31~ 14~ 1 34 166 112 202 80 13 6 159 22.8 62 199 9c PRECINCT 193 267 9~ 122 138 84 162 59 131 121 179 54 140 9 7 PRECI NCT 194 239 :l ~ 92 97 89 141 50 96 118 149 45 129 7 8 PKE:ClNCT 195 204 St 8 1 91 76 117 54 8 1 10 4 133 j9 108 7C PREC INCT 196 75 22 30 21 31 32 22 18 46 36 20 L9 3 1 PREC I NCT 197 252 1 2~ lOC 132 92 174 53 106 13 7 186 48 154 8 7 PRElNCT 198 246 1 0~ 9 7 106 102 145 o9 100 132 1~ 9 58 133 S7 PREC INCT 199 235 8~ 80 8.t. 86 120 55 61 13 4 119 57 91 102 PRECINCT 200 425 232 131 232 132 302 70 211 191 324 54 l.6~ 125 P~ EC lt-.CT 201 358 1 8~ 117 20( 100 250 53 175 161 285 36 212 114 PREC INCT 202 290 1 5~ 9c; 1 63 87 208 4C 158 112 2.27 31 183 82 PREC IN CT 203 2 12 1 2.1 5 7 105 15 153 30 105 99 162 30 125 b9 PRECI NCT 204 249 131 89 121 101 163 60 118 11! l U5 40 149 86 PRECI~ C T 205 123 8.1 23 73 33 89 19 61 55 99 14 81 33 PRECI NCT 200 1 57 51 b3 5~ 58 Hl 29 62 76 91 30 59 75 TOTAL SUP OI~T 4 9198 l3310 41 99 IZ038 ~888 L090 ~ 9'4 5 ~l.28 l3195 p522 t-4 ? 1 '.065 l3081 STATEMENT UF ALL VOTcS CAST AT THE bENtRAL ELcCTION NOV LMt3 E:H 3 , 19 7 (, PAGE ~9 MEASURES SUBM I TTtO TO V(TE OF VOTERS ( CGNT. T N N N N t\ t\ N t'c N N N N a 0 0 0 0 (, 0 c c c c lJ 0 T A L l l l l l l l l l l -~ ~ 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 0 0 v 0 T A E G A c I A y y y y y f N s c N E N E N E N c N u s T s 0 s 0 s c s 0 5 0 R T PREC INC'T 207 388 170 139 1 3 7 166 207 115 130 225 2 32 88 lc6 1 64 P~EC I NCT 208 270 147 66 137 7 8 162 bl 9 3 158 175 49 159 77 PRECI NCT 209 252 107 83 8 l:l 95 1 25 6 3 76 149 1 37 64 119 88 PRtCINCT 2 10 2 76 11~ 98 103 113 145 72 80 176 16 1 69 132 1 11 PRE:C INCT 2 11 278 13G 103 120 11 5 153 81 H9 172 183 50 135 llc PR EC INCT 2 12 258 11 . 5 66 1 01 86 148 50 8 6 139 141 ~ l 14C 7C PR EC INCT 2 13 2 l b 132 94 110 111 154 75 86 174 169 6 7 135 10 E P ~E C I NC T 214 4 6 4 2 3 ~ 12 5 205 14 ~ 262 97 153 206 290 73 2 13 173 PR ECINCT 2 15 304 1 0~ 10 5 92 117 l.3 80 77 183 1 54 59 117 119 PR E:CINCT 2 1 6 315 1 2~ 80 110 89 143 b3 9 2 15 5 l4b 51 116 ioe PRE:C INCT 2 17 245 7 ~ 8 5 6~ 86 114 60 77 136 126 46 99 85 PR ECINCT 2 18 300 120 97 1 01 123 139 83 86 177 159 6 2 107 1 35 PR ECINCT 2 19 26.t; 1 0 ~ 94 93 104 109 94 6 1 167 135 7 2 l OC 12C PRECINCT 220 378 lS .1 125 142 12rl 182 90 10 5 217 206 70 148 15C PRtCINCT 221 3 66 172 1 0 7 155 122 197 89 10 1 23 0 225 75 158 160 PRECI NCT 222 231 9i 60 7 t 73 122 47 77 12 9 124 46 l Ou 83 PRECINCT 223 271 1 2 ~ 78 111 95 1 57 59 85 l t9 1 ~9 54 112 111 PRE:CIN CT 224 296 13t 89 111 11 6 158 73 86 l t:l l 159 67 112 130 PRf:CI NCT 225 233 l 0: 87 85 103 111 80 66 139 136 55 113 87 PR E:CINCT 226 245 11 ( 78 93 90 132 61 86 12 6 132 58 117 8 c; PREC INCT 227 314 1 5 ( 112 11 8 139 183 78 103 188 199 71 148 13 1 PREC INCT 228 3 4 2 1 2~ 144 1 07 145 1 67 92 89 204 19 1 8 1 164 114 PRECI NCT 229 2 85 105 103 98 1 04 135 6 7 86 1 59 163 6 1 140 95 PRECINCT 230 244 95 83 82 8 7 1 06 68 63 142 127 55 112 85 PR ECINCT 231 252 9t 9 5 85 100 123 69 8 2 136 1 36 64 97 10 6 PR EC INCT 232 238 87 83 79 85 106 66 70 1 21 113 55 96 9 0 PRE:C INCT 233 284 111 93 102 9 4 126 17 109 122 147 66 1 0~ 112 PRECINCT 234 201 13 57 65 69 88 47 62 98 98 40 80 6 7 PRECINCT 235 258 9Y 90 85 1 01 115 69 79 144 123 13 105 95 PRECINCT 236 258 11 ; 8.:l l OE 93 135 o7 93 137 1 59 50 l J. 7 102 PRECINCT 231 253 123 72 92 9 7 152 47 100 128 158 47 136 7 f; PRECINCT 238 341 1 9~ 96 153 12 1 190 87 112 209 217 74 147 166 PRE CINCT 239 334 13 9 8 l l l: 11 7 168 83 92 19 1 19 4 62. 144 13 2 PREC INCT 240 19 t:I 7 ~ 62 5l: 74 96 46 55 116 98 4 2. 98 6 1 PRECINCT 2 41 9 7 3 t: 35 3t 35 4 5 3 1 27 58 so 2 1 4 ~ ,- j_i; PRt: CINCT 2 4 2 252 1 2~ 8 0 l 0.5 99 132 70 87 144 159 48 133 86 PRt: CIN CT 2 43 113 3 .l 29 29 30 3 1 25 30 55 44 19 39 34 PRE:CINCT 244 29 11 8 7 11 1 5 5 7 19 12 8 12 11 PRECINCT 2 45 417 2 12 1 15 177 145 234 95 110 2 73 268 78 196 162 PHEC I NCT 2 46 2 19 l l C 6 7 94 82 132 50 78 124 140 48 1 2 1 74 PRECINCT 2 47 381 20~ 114 1 81 133 222 94 1 18 232 2~4 74 192 141 PRE CINCT 2 48 353 163 115 1 34 140 188 94 12 4 192 202 76 174 130 PKECINCT 2 49 3 13 150 110 1 24 13 0 174 88 94 195 196 69 14 7 1 24 PRtCINCT 250 3 18 153 1 01 1 37 119 1 93 71 113 183 205 61 17 2 1 13 PRECINCT 25 1 4 55 2 19 144 1 82 174 251 112 144 2 77 295 88 2 11 179 PREC INCT 2~2 4 1 8 2 19 126 182 159 23 5 113 142 244 2 73 84 2 ~ 0 151 PREC INCT 253 502 27 ~ 132 229 178 305 112 1 83 285 33 7 ':1 1 25 7 19C PREC I"4CT 254 253 1 27 92 111 9Y 152 62 78 16 3 182 4 3 1L9 96 PRcCINCT 255 3 43 1 8 '4 103 139 144 217 76 114 209 222 73 165 143 PREC INCT 256 304 14.i 106 1 3 1 12 4 179 8 1 112 175 2 14 52 160 113 PRE CI NCT 257 141 47 41 34 50 54 34 25 95 59 3o 55 SC PR ECI NCT 258 64 l ~ 26 9 32 17 2o 19 33 23 22 l c; 3C PREC INCT 259 252 9~ 92 85 94 123 C6 6 7 152 142 55 12.2 8 7 PRl:CINCT 260 299 11 100 99 112 127 87 79 186 169 58 119 1 21 PRECINCT 261 323 153 1 25 145 131 196 H5 110 195 2 15 69 164 130 PRE CINCT 262 2 55 83 88 80 86 109 06 . 5~ 147 117 Sd 91 1 01 PRECINCT 263 190 60 71 42 85 76 5 7 51 116 85 49 ~ 95 PRE:CINCT 264 326 90 144 81 148 13 1 99 72 2 11 162 80 141 126 PRE:CINCT 265 260 11.t; 71 1 0 7 74 12 4 63 9 3 110 13 7 47 109 7S PREC INCT 266 2 87 10( 75 92 93 111 1 5 82 141 117 10 102 9 4 PREC INCT 267 7 8 21 26 1 8 31 31 19 17 42 25 22 l ~ 36 TOTAL SUP DIST 5 16966 5472 63 77 4 3 12 5218 3572 764 7 7452 6328 8759 ~8 1 9 ~ 77 8 : 455 - . STATEMENT UF ALL VOTES CAST AT 1Hf: Gtl\ERAL t l tCTiuN NOVtMBEK 3, 19 70 PAC,t. bC. MEASURt 5 SUBM ITTEO Tu VGTE: OF VOTtKS l C. C1~ T l T N N N N I\ f\ " I\ "' N N N 0 0 0 u 0 c c G 0 L c 0 0 T A L l l 1 l l l l l l l 2 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 0 0 v 0 T A E b A c 1 A y y y y y F N s E N E N E N E N E i u s T s u s 0 ~ 0 s 0 s (J k T TOTAL SUP DI ST l l 5223 3 114 7 801 ~476 78 18 ~ 4 6 7 7887 6680 t;3777 9535 8 75 1880 3021 TOTAL SUP OI ST 2 0864 458 1 93 7 5 ~726 :} 9 31 37 05 l Pl 2 4 l 0571 542 7 1 1754 i024 l ~240 :601 TOTAL SUP Ol !: f 3 1027 4476 l 0 4 0( 3 4 oO l D802 3298 l 1890 l 190 5 795 l B327 ~ 4 93 l t030 !'l387 TOTAL SUP DI ST 4 9 198 3310 41 9c:i 2038 6888 1696 lt 9 45 4128 3195 15522 t45 1 0 6 5 3081 TOTAL SUP DIST 5 l 6966 5 47 2 6377 43 12 5 2 18 3572 7647 ~4 52 6328 t3 759 ~ 8 1 9 ~77 8 : 4 55 SUB TOTALS ~ 327 8 ~ 0953 ~ 8 1 52 l 0012 3 7657 l t738 4 ~ 4 '13 4 12 73 c 2 4522 4 8897 3 662 5 1993 2 75 4 5 ABSENTEE TOTAL 5 3 747 708 1 624 559 ~ 1 86 514 . 9~3 1 9 76 1 0 4 3 l2b8 150 -' 47 8 1172 GRAND TOTALS t 7 0 25 ~ l 721 :; 9776 l 0571 3 ~ 8 4 3 l 252 4 t446 4 471 5 2 5565 5 1185 3 7 8 12 5 t471 2 ~ 717 STATEMENT OF ALL Vu TcS CAS T AT IHE GtNERAL ELEC f I ON NOVE:MBER 3 , 1970 PAlt 61 COUNTY MtASURt:S OKD . REF . OKO I ~ANCE T E E (, c 0 L l v v T L L A c c l A A p p s s v I I " v 0 T T c c T A A E I N c A y y s E N E N - T s 0 s 0 - PRECINCT 001 297 149 126 153 81 PRECINCT 002 325 169 133 1 62 90 PRE:C INCT 003 29 2 156 1 C9 142 8 1 - PRlCINCT 004 371 185 149 1~ 5 113 PRE:CINT 005 257 118 124 122 87 - PREC INCT 006 33 4 133 147 1 3 7 89 PRE:CINCT 007 254 l Ci 133 1 34 6 c; PRE CI NCT 008 336 1 2~ 1 8 7 113 94 PREC I NCT 009 256 12.:; 114 12C 89 PRt:CINCT 0 10 425 13 c;: 2 4 5 226 109 PR EC 1NCT 0 11 403 1 3~ 250 2 1 ~ 108 PREC INCT 0 12 380 14( 225 l 9Li 116 PRE C.I NCT 0 13 296 10 "'j 173 162 83 PREC INCT 0 14 2 72 9 c; 158 l 5E 7C PRECI NCT 0 15 422 1 2 1 281 236 1 0 4 PRE:CINCT 0 16 369 l 2t 223 22C 93 PRECINCT 0 17 280 l C] 161 155 77 PKEC.I NCT 0 18 3rl5 1 2~ 233 2 12 103 PRECI NCT 0 19 4 63 1 3~ 297 2 4 2 111 PREC INCT 020 473 171 280 2 43 146 PREC.INCT 021 3 40 1 3 ' 189 199 90 PRE CINCT 022 311 81 211 178 15 PRECINCT. 023 408 123 277 239 1 03 PR l: C. INCT 024 406 llC 2 78 230 108 PRlCINCT 025 72 16 55 4 0 2 4 PRE CINCT 026 108 4 ~ 5 7 59 32 PRl:C INCT 027 362 1 2~ 22 7 2 18 94 PRECINCT 028 357 i o~ 239 211 93 PKE:CINCT 029 37 2 152 179 1 83 98 PRt CI NCT 030 3 10 11 ~ 1 6) 156 84 PREC I NCT 031 388 1 5~ 2C4 2 10 114 PRfCIN CT 032 4 38 15C 261 25t 1 07 PRECINCT 03.:S 41 8 165 239 235 1 04 PRECINCT 034 386 117 24 9 22C 98 PKECI NCT 035 302 Bi 181 1.23 112 PRE CINCT 036 354 11.l 2 12 1 71 108 PRlCIN CT 037 393 145 222 196 l l b PRE CINCT 038 335 llt 190 l 73 90 PRECINCT 039 364 123 2 16 179 122 PRE C.INCT 0 40 3 14 9 -:; 203 1 89 b l PRt:CINCT 0 41 4 19 148 254 254 109 PRt ClNCT 0 42 2 12 7 2. 117 l CC 6 3 PxECINCT 0 43 360 133 207 203 95 PRECI NCT 0 44 307 93 l f:l a 160 84 PRECINCT 0 4 5 . 91 130 145 153 82 I - - , TOTAL SUP DIST l l 5223 8 725 8099 )535 itl99 STATEMENT OF ALL VOTES CAS T AT THE: GE~tKAL E L tC Tl u~ ~O V EMdtR 3 , 19 7u PAGl l2. COUNTY ME A SlJRE: S ORO . Rf r . URu 11\A NC E: T t. E c c 0 L l v v T L l A (, c l A A p p s s v I I v v 0 { T c c T A A E N N c A y y s E N E N T s 0 s 0 PRE:CINCT 0 4 6 28 7 105. 149 113 95 PRECINCT 0 47 298 11.o! 153 158 75 PRECINCT 0 48 207 0c 108 11 ts 47 PRECINCT 0 49 2 10 9( 13 3 llC 77 PRECINCT 050 286 82 1 62 115 92 PRECINCT 051 192 ~ t 66 80 43 PRECINCT 052 343 l l j l7C 14C 96 PRECINCT 053 320 8 1 214 147 97 PRECINCT 0:)4 267 0c 141 117 6 5 PRECINCT 055 178 55 84 64 4 9 P~ECINCT 056 2 15 6 i 118 103 4 8 PRECINCT 057 357 143 178 158 11 c PRECINCT 058 389 12t 240 201 112 PRECINCT 059 307 112 167 1 54 73 PRECINCT 060 2 75 0c 175 142 7 3 PRECINCT 06 1 2 40 1 f:. 132 116 53 PRECI NCT 062 2 76 7S 166 145 66 PRECINCT 063 354 llC 2 19 202 74 PRECINCT 064 297 81 190 lo3 68 PRECINCT 065 226 74 124 111 59 PRECINCT 006 347 1 0~ 215 1 9C 85 PRECINCT 067 354 1 04 231 195 81 PRE:C INCT 068 364 12S 2 10 2C5 91 PRECINCT 069 277 1C8 140 129 87 PRECINCT 0 70 255 1 01 138 129 81 PRECINCT 071 325 140 145 1 56 86 PRECINCT 0 12 282 8~ 177 143 79 PRECINCT 0 73 338 111 l b4 166 86 PRECINCT 0 74 324 103 196 1 77 8; PRECINCT 0 75 241 71 15 7 110 85 PRECINCT 0 76 257 7 '3 149 12 2 73 PRECINCT 011 304 108 173 156 83 PRECINCT 0 78 3 48 92 224 183 7 8 PRECINCT 0 79 309 109 168 145 96 PRECIN CT 080 338 1 0 ! 175 142 90 PRE CINCT 081 274 l 0 .: l .;j c 135 64 PkECINCT 082 249 71 123 1 0 7 60 PRECINCT 083 221 75 122 1 04 61 PRECI NCT 084 306 95 1 5C 116 6; PRECINCT 065 237 9~ 124 1 0'4 77 PRECINCT 086 236 77 133 1 03 80 PRECINCT 087 271 9 1 153 121 80 PRECINCT 088 289 85 173 112 1 0 0 PRECINCT 089 258 82 156 128 74 PRE CI NCT 090 288 101 1 51 1 C7 110 PRE:CINCT 091 302 112 1 6 7 12t 1 0 ; PRECINCT 092 3 49 l Oc 208 167 1 0 7 PRECINCT 093 284 8~ 169 13S 82 PKEC IN CT 094 4 05 11-; 250 l 9S 116 PRECINCT 095 477 2 1 ( 252 2 76 140 PRECINCT 096 36 7 l 0 CJ 23 7 201 89 I PRECINCT 097 388 134 234 2 15 1 0 9 PRECINCT 098 2 84 l Qt. 159 125 1 02 PRECINCT 099 294 10'4 165 155 92 PRECI NCT 100 350 13 1 194 192 9 1 PR ECINCT 10 1 350 14.2 18 1 1 82 89 PRECINCT 102 337 10 1 211 1 6-4 10 4 PRECINCT 103 366 133 21 5 190 111 PRECINCT 10 4 304 124 162 1 57 83 PRECI NCT 105 327 120 18 7 168 112 ~ PRECI NCT l Ot 3 04 116 177 170 81 PRECINCT 107 3 23 llt 198 182 91 PRECINCT 108 498 1 64 299 2 75 132 PRECINCT 109 399 14 ~ 23 1 229 1 01 PRE:CINCT 110 355 117 L l 8 1 87 108 PRECINCT 111 207 84 105 9 7 6 7 PRECINCT 112 433 l 8S 2 1 ; 23'4 114 PRE CINCT 113 285 1 2~ l~l 1 5'4 79 TOTAL SUP DI ST 2 ~ 0864 l 1 795 l 033C 1713 1 82 6 - STATlMENT Of All VOTlS CA5T AT THE GlNERAL ELECTION NOVE:M~ER 3 , 1Y70 PAGE. 63 COJNTY ME:A~UKtS ORD . REF. ORD INANCE T E E (, c 0 L L 'v v T L L A c c L A A p p s s v I I v v 0 T T c c T A A E N N c A y y s E N E N T s 0 s 0 PRECINCT 114 257 115 128 141 74 PRECINCT 115 410 169 204 228 86 PRECINCT 116 304 1 5~ 110 143 77 PRECINCT 117 383 1 5~ 215 235 95 PRECINCT 118 403 13l: 253 241 'i5 PRECINCT 119 289 11 ~ 148 l 50 8'i PRECINCT 120 334 14! 18( 179 106 PRE:CINCT 121 213 8~ 122 120 62 PREC INCT 122 157 6C 89 81 56 PRtCINCT 123 432 l5J 271 235 12C PRECINCT 124 447 l 7 ~ 264 241 124 PRECINCT 125 382 16 ~ 197 191 99 PRECINCT 126 378 16~ LOS 22( 106 P~ECINCT 1 27 445 191 241 251 1 07 PRECINCT 128 458 18 ~ 25~ 26~ 130 PRECINCT 129 481 23( 243 L9( 116 PRECI~CT 130 3 7.li 15( 216 2 lt 114 PRECINCT 131 414 16~ 2:31 265 95 PRECINCT 132 372 16" 193 193 123 PRE:CINCT 133 478 24c 196 256 108 PRt(.INCT 134 383 l 7~ 186 198 114 PRECINCT 135 396 1 6~ 225 237 111 PRECINCT 136 351 141 202 171 118 PRECINCT 137 303 12~ 169 l 72 82 P;{E:CINCT 138 529 19l: 323 307 145 PRECINCT 139 35 l: 11 ~ 229 20( 114 PRECINCT 140 290 12~ 158 142 103 PRE:CINCT 141 329 13( 192 157 113 PRECINCT 142 405 182 214 223 119 PRE:CINCT 143 322 151 157 160 116 PRtCINCT 144 332 121 186 161 111 PRECINCT 145 339 141 175 181 104 PRECINCT 146 294 12! 154 l 5t 8 7 PRE:CINCT 147 413 21~ 18~ 221 125 PRECINCT 148 435 18( 237 2Cl 162 PRE~INCT 149 358 149 198 18 12 4 PRECINCT 150 418 l 6t 226 191 142 PRECINC.T 151 372 142 . 202 166 120 PRECI1~CT 152 315 6~ 237 178 75 PRECINCT 1!3 400 21 369 219 85 PRECINCT 1 54 312 2~ 283 1 57 14 PRE:CINCT 155 246 1 233 124 73 PRECINCT 156 331 4C 282 186 72 ' PR EC INCT 157 376 3l: 335 195 99 PRE:CINC.T 158 274 19 253 155 67 PRECINCT 159 419 154 249 L44 112 PRECINCT 160 414 17S 225 119 164 PRECINCT 161 317 l6l 140 lo7 92 PRECINCT 162 459 l9L 251 244 145 PRE:C.I ~~CT 163 313 112 197 15J 122 PRlCINCT 164 364 145 209 1 81 134 PRECINCT 165 188 8(i 98 96 56 PRECINCT 166 l t;8 68 105 7'1 67 PR ECINCT 1 6 7 464 19S 243 215 149 PRECINCT 168 338 13~ 177 162 115 PRECINCT 169 333 152 158 162 99 PRECINCT 170 3 74 151 183 l 7! . 9C PRECINCT 171 310 133 149 123 83 PRECINCT 172 256 103 130 114 59 TOTAL SUP DIST 3 ; 1027 1 2096 l 1114 ~057 ~1 2 4 PREC I NCT 173 PREC I NCT 174 PRt:CINCT 17 ~ PRlCI NCT 176 PRE:C I NCT 177 PRE:Cl NCT 178 PRECI NCT 179 PRE: C l NCT 180 PREC I NCT 1 8 1 PREC I NCT 182 PRt:C INCT 183 PREC I NCT 1 84 PREC INCT l d5 PREC INCT 186 PR EC INCT 1 87 PRE:C l NCT 188 PREC INCT 189 PREC INCT 190 PREC I NCT 1 9 1 PRE CINCT 192 PREC I NCT 193 PREC INCT 194 PRE CINCT 195 PRl:C I NCT 196 PRECI NCT 1 97 PRECINCT 198 PREC INCT 199 PRL.CI NCT 200 PREC INCT 201 PRECINCT 202 PRl:C INCT 203 PREC INCT 204 PRE CI NCT 205 PRl:CI NCT 206 TOTAL SUP DIST 4 STATtMtNT OF All VOTl:S CA,T AT f HE: GE~E:KAl ELECT I ON NOVf:M~E:R 3 , 197C PAGf: 64 COUNTY Mt: A SURE 5 ORU . Rl:f . OKU I NANCE: T E: E c c 0 L l v v T l l A c c l A A p p s , v I I v v 0 T T c c T A A E N N c A y y s E N E N T s 0 s 0 280 148 108 BL 1 10 2 78 143 12 1 152 81 3 14 143 146 159 95 3 48 142 1 94 169 145 295 150 132 1 71 82 280 132 13 1 130 114 325 136 163 162 1 04 3 12 132 140 1 3 1 95 404 l S l 190 234 11 c 246 95 144 l l9 72 408 182 217 228 139 263 1 2~ 12 5 141 96 300 13 1 159 173 96 2 7 8 123 1 4.2 14b 85 223 95 115 119 74 232 1 07 l C4 96 84 330 1 5'1 148 153 12 e 195 90 9 1 84 58 241 100 116 113 84 314 144 165 185 102 267 152 108 142 90 239 121 103 112 85 204 at 110 113 63 7 5 3 1 42 35 23 252 96 148 124 109 246 108 126 113 100 235 104 117 89 86 425 2 15 1 9 7 242 132 358 166 180 209 103 290 1 2 7 1 54 1 81 8 1 2 12 105 101 128 60 24 9 117 129 139 87 . 123 3E 80 73 33 1 57 71 77 66 56 . 9 198 4523 4725 r. 2 15 13062 STATEMENT OF ALL VOTES CA5T AT THE GENERAL c l ECTlUN ~OVEMHER 3 1970 PAllt: 65 COUNTY Mt:A5UKl:S OKO . Rt:F . ORD I NANCE T E E c c 0 L L v v T L L A c c L A A p p s s v I 1 v v 0 T T c c T A A E N N c A y v s E N E N T s 0 s 0 PRECINCT 201 388 15 189 148 177 PRECINCT 208 21 0 13 1 12 7 123 l O; ' PRECINCT 209 252 1 0 1 12'i 105 89 PRECINCT 2.10 276 115 141 120 106 PRECINCT 211 2 78 14( 12 7 134 l OS PRECINCT 2 12 258 11: lll: 117 76 PRECINCT 213 276 13( 133 11 'i 12 1 PRE:CINCT 214 46'i 23t: 19L 2 Oi 156 PRt:C.INCT 15 304 141 131 118 11 0 PRECI"4CT 216 315 121 123 12 t: 92 PRE:CINCT 2 17 245 11 ~ 10( 9t: 78 PRt:CINCT 2 18 300 11 ~ 1 5~ l Ct: 126 PREC INCT 219 2 6'i 10 1 12.t 1 C3 104 PRECINCT 220 3 78 l 8t 150 1 3; 147 PREC INCT 221 366 20i 132 162 132 PRECINC.T 222 231 l C~ 105 112 71 PREC INCT 223 277 13l: 121 13'i 83 PRE:CINCT 224 296 14' 12 7 145 93 PRl:CINCT 225 233 9~ 110 9( 1 0 7 PRECINCT 226 245 1 0~ 114 l 05 d9 PRECINCT 227 314 15t 137 142 12 7 PRl:CINCT 2.28 342 1 56 146 150 12 5 PREC INCT 229 285 11 t: 13 1 109 104 PRECINCT 30 244 l OC 114 9 7 &2 PRECINCT 23 1 252 9~ 125 1 09 92 PREC I NCT 232 238 101 106 ae 84 PR EC INCT 2J3 284 11 t: 122 1C5 103 PRf:CINCT 234 207 9 1 71 Bl: 56 PRECINCT 235 258 11 L. 114 93 98 PRECINCT 236 258 11( 122 lll 100 PKECINCT 237 253 llE llC 114 90 PRtCINCT 238 341 15 c; 163 155 142 PRECINCT 239 334 14i 153 14 11 5 PRECINCT 240 198 94 77 7 68 PRECINCT 241 97 4 ; 41 35 37 PRE:CINCT 242 252 102 125 llC 1 0 7 PRECI NCT 243 113 5 34 42 30 PRECINCT 244 29 l ~ 11 1( 11 PRECI NCT 2 45 417 20 180 l 8t: 157 PRECINCT 246 2 19 10 1 111 103 82 PRE:CINCT 24 7 381 166 195 l 8t 144 PREC INCT 2 4 8 353 1 6~ 163 17C 11 ) PREC INCT 249 3 13 12( 177 138 132 PRECINCT 250 318 11 t 1 81 145 12 1 PRECI NCT 251 455 20~ 225 187 190 PRECI NCT 252 41 8 17 ~ 21S 187 174 PRECI NCT 253 502 223 249 241 185 PR ECINCT 254 253 1 01 140 121 94 PR EC INCT 255 3 43 15! 165 1 67 126 PREClNCT 256 304 1 2 ~ 1 6 1 119 147 PREC INCT 251 141 6 1 66 46 52 PRECI NCT 258 64 22 33 20 30 PREClNCT 259 252 1 0~ 126 c39 102 PREC I NCT 260 299 118 145 109 111 PRECIN CT 261 323 135 174 145 131 PRECINCT 262 255 1 3~ 92 95 86 PRECINCT 263 190 111 63 66 7 5 PRECINCT 264 326 11 i 140 125 114 PRECINCT 265 260 131 89 116 80 PREC INCT 266 287 110 117 111 89 PRECINCT 267 78 3 7 29 2 1 2 1 TOTAL SUP DI ST 5 l 6966 7783 7185 7554 0308 STATtMENT OF ALL VGTtS CAST AT THE GE ~ ERA L ELcCTION NOVEMBE:R 31 19 70 PAG t 66 COUNTY MEASURES ORD . RE:F . ORD l NANCE T E E c c 0 L L v v T L L A c c L A A p p s s v I I v v 0 T T (, c T A A E N N c A y y s E N E N T s 0 s 0 TOTAL SUP DI ST l 1 52 23 8725 8099 15535 41 99 . TOTAL SUP DI ST 2 ~ 0864 l 1795 l 0330 71 3 1 5 82 6 TOTAL SUP DIST 3 ' 1027 1 12 096 l 1114 ~ 8 057 6 12 4 TOTAL SUP OIST 4 9 19 8 4 523 4725 !t 2 15 t3 062 TOTAL SUP DI ST 5 1 6 966 7783 71 85 7554 6308 SUB TOTALS E 3 278 4 4 ;22 4 1453 3 24 92 2 15 5 1 9 ABSENT EE TOTAL S 3747 1993 1 8 66 1391 1 042 GRAND TOTALS E 7 025 4 6 9 15 4 1331 9 3 3883 2 6 561 . . STATEMENT OF ALL VOTES CAST AT THE Gl:NERAL ELECT lGN NOVEMBE:R 3 , 197C PA(,t: 67 COUNTY MEASURES CONTINUE:O GOLl:TA SCH . 80. MEMBER BC:.f\0 MEA5URE T A B tJ p s w 5 s 0 L L (, H T H ,. M T v 0 A I u I J J A A I L L A s u u L R s p L R T H H A I I T 0 s s v D N p N 0 0 E s T E c A y s E: N T s G PRECINCT 001 217 PRECINCT 002 325 PRECINCT 003 292 PRECINCT 004 371 PRECINCT 005 257 PRECINCT 006 334 PRECINCT 007 254 PRECINCT 008 336 PRECINCT 009 256 PRECINCT 010 425 PRECINCT 011 403 PRECINCT 012 386 PRECINCT 013 296 PRECINCT 014 272 PRECINCT 015 422 PRECINCT 016 369 PRECINCT 017 280 PRECINCT 018 385 PRECINCT 019 463 PRECINCT 020 473 PRECINCT 021 340 PRECINCT 022 311 PRECINCT 023 408 PRECINCT 024 406 PRECINCT 025 72 PRECINCT 026 108 PRECINCT 027 362 PRECINCT 02d 357 PRECINCT 029 372 PRECINCT 030 310 PRECINCT 031 388 PRECINCT 032 438 PREC INCT 033 418 PRECINCT 034 386 PRECINCT 035 302 PRECINCT 036 354 PRECINCT 037 393 PRECINCT 038 335 PRECINCT 039 36.t; PRECINCT 040 314 PRECINCT 041 419 PRECINCT 042 212 PRECINCT 043 360 PRECINCT 044 307 PRECINCT 045 291 TOTAL SUP DIST l l 5223 STATEMENT OF ALL VOfE5 CA~T AT THE GE"'ERAL ELECT ION NOVEMBE:R 3, 1970 PAGt 08 COUNTY ME: A SUKE S CON TI NUED GOLETA SCH. BO . MEMBER BCf\D tJEASU~E T A B M p s w s s 0 L L c H l H , , T v u A I u I J J A A I L L A s u u l R s p l R T H h A I I T 0 s s v D N p N 0 0 E s T E c A y - s E f\ T s c PRECINCT 046 287 PRECINCT 047 298 PREClNCT 048 201 PRECINCT 049 270 PRECINCT 050 286 PRECINCT 051 192 PRECINCT 052 343 PRECINCT 053 320 PRECINCT 054 267 PRECINCT 055 178 PRECINCT 056 215 PRECINCT 057 357 PRtClNCT 058 389 PRECINCT 059 307 PRECINCT 060 275 PRECINC.T 061 240 PRECINCT 062 276 PRECINCT 063 354 PRECINCT 064 297 PRECINCT 065 226 PRECINCT 066 347 PRECINCT 067 354 PRECINCT 068 364 PRECINCT 069 277 PRECINCT 070 255 PRECINCT 071 325 PRtCINCT 072 282 PRECINCT 073 338 PRECINCT 074 324 PkE:CINCT 075 241 PRt:CINCT 076 257 PRECINCT 077 304 PRECINCT 078 348 PRECINCT 079 309 PRECINCT 080 338 PRECINCT 081 274 PRECINCT 082 249 PRECINCT 083 221 PRECINCT 084 306 PRECINCT 085 237 PRECINCT 086 236 PRECINCT 087 271 PRECINCT 088 289 PRECINCT 089 258 PRECINCT 090 288 PRECINCT 091 302 PRECINCT 092 349 PRECINCT 093 284 PRECINCT 094 405 PRECINCT 095 477 PRECINCT 096 367 PRECINCT 097 388 PRECINCT 098 284 PRECINCT 099 294 PRECINCT 100 350 PRtCINCT 101 350 PRECINCT 102 337 PRECINCT 103 366 PRECINCT 104 304 PRECINCT 105 327 PRECINCT 106 304 PRE:CINCT 107 323 PRECINCT 108 498 P.RECINCT 109 399 PRECINCT 110 355 PRECINCT 111 207 PRECINCT 112 433 PRECINCT 113 285 TOTAL SUP DIST 2 ~ 0864 PRECINCT 114 PRECINCT 115 PRECINCT llo PRECINCT 117 PRECINCT 118 PRECINCT 119 PRECINCT 120 PRECINC.T lLl PRECINCT 122 PRECINCT 123 PKECINCT 124 PREC INCT 125 PRECINCT 126 PRECINCT 127 PRECINCT 128 PRt:CINCT 1L9 PRECINCT 130 PRECINCT 131 PRECINCT 132 PRECINCT 133 PRECINCT 134 PRECINCT 135 PRECINCT 136 PRECINl.T 137 PRECINCT 138 PRECINCT 139 PRECINCT 140 Pl{EC,INCT 141 PRECINCT 142 PRECINCT 143 PRECINCT 144 PRECINCT 145 PRECINCT 146 PRECINCT 147 PRECINCT 148 PRECINCT 149 PRtCINCT 150 PRECINCT 151 PRECINCT 152 PRECINCT 153 PRECINl.T 154 PRECINCT 155 PRECINCT 156 PRECINC.T 157 PRECINCT 158 PRECINCT l 59 PRECINCT 160 PRECINCT 161 PRECINCT 162 PRECINCT 163 PKECINCT 164 PRECINCT 165 PRECINCT 166 Pt{EClNCT 167 PRECINCT 168 PRE:CINCT 169 PRECINCT 170 PRECINCT 171 PRECINCT 172 OTAL ~UP DIST 3 STATEMENT OF ALL VOTt~ CAST AT COUNTY ME:A5U~ES C.uNTlNUtO GOLETA SCH. BO . Ml:MBER T A B M P S W 0 L L C H T H T V 0 A I U 1 A A ILL AS L R S P L R T A I l T 0 V 0 N P N O O E S T E c A s T 257 410 304 383 403 289 334 213 157 432 447 382 378 445 458 481 374 41 372 478 383 396 351 303 ~29 356 290 329 405 322 332 339 294 413 435 358 418 372 315 400 312 246 331 376 274 419 414 317 459 313 364 108 188 464 338 333 374 310 256 21 2 3 2 1 31 l l l l 18 15 22 20 17 l 2 21 21 34 3 2 2 4C 4 22 3 56 30 2~ 29 2 2 34 2 29 42 19 3C 1 ; 31 9 85 7 48 lOC 82 41 93 b2 43 91 5 37 105 61 51 93 1 47 121 5 27 124 5 23 i6 5 23 130 39 39 184 68 20 109 49 36 120 69 30 110 58 34 101 4 27 160 103 49 116 57 21 113 51 28 97 52 30 83 7; 37 89 47 16 68 63 27 91 57 24 60 55 25 ; 8 93 42 115 82 37 101 66 34 106 65 51 67 63 54 28 38 99 26 54 128 26 47 89 22 21 82 29 64 94 34 45 117 21 3 82 82 62 56 98 63 39 77 47 33 78 90 71 65 56 31 79 67 35 25 16 11 66 107 69 102 55 66 61 98 81 105 7C 113 64 187 4S 88 96 107 67 67 62 97 81 66 70 81 52 65 38 61 88 93 49 87 26 43 49 68 55 105 38 77 54 67 46 12 52 64 45 74 43 93 48 73 42 91 34 66 24 66 40 57 22 51 30 38 29 47 32 63 23 57 59 96 64 90 45 77 56 98 49 76 45 91 16 38 102 7 716 19 74 428 1074 533 183 TH t GENERAL tll:CTION NOVEMBE~ 3 , 1970 BC.t\D s,., J lJ s y E s MEASURE: s fol J u H s ~ c PAGl: 69 . PRECINCT 173 PRECINCT 174 PRECINCT 175 PRECINCT 176 PRECINCT 177 PRECINCT 178 PRECINCT 179 PRECINCT 180 PRt:CINCT ldl PRECINCT 182 PRf:CINCT 183 PRECINCT 184 PRECINCT 185 PRECINCT 186 PRECINCT 187 PRECINCT 188 PRECINCT 189 PRECINCT 190 PRECINCT 191 PREClNCT 192 PR EC INCT 193 PRECINCT 194 PRECINCT 195 PRECINCT 196 PRECINCT 197 PREC.lNCT 198 PRECINCT 199 PRECINCT 200 PRECINCT 201 PRECINCT 202 PRECINCT 203 PREC INCT 204 PRECINCT 205 PRl:C.INCT 206 STAlE:MENT OF ALL VOTES CAST AT CuUNTY Mt:A~URE~ CuNTINUf:O GO L E TA SC H B D T 0 T A L v 0 T E c A s T 280 278 31Lj 348 295 280 325 312 40Lj 246 408 263 300 278 223 232 330 195 241 314 267 239 204 75 252 246 235 425 358 290 212 249 123 157 A L v. A R A D 0 t3 M p L c H 0 A 1 I L L s p L I I N p E s ME:t-'btR s w T H . u I A 5 R T T 0 l'4 TOTAL SUP DIST 4 9198 THt: GENERAL t:LECT ION NOVEMBt:R . BCf'.D s "J u H s y E s f-IEA~URE s M J u H s N 0 3 , 1970 PAGE: 70 ' STATEMENT OF ALL VOTt5 CAST AT THt: GENERAL ELECT ION NOVtMBtR 3, 197v PAut 71 CIJUNlY MEASURl~ CuN TlNUEO GOLETA SCH . BO . ME:Ml:3ER t3Cf\L t-' E ASU ~E T A B M p s " s s 0 L L c H T H " , T v 0 A J u I J J A A I L L A s u u L R s p L R T h H A I I T 0 s s v 0 N p N 0 0 E s T E c A y s E N T s 0 PRECINCT 207 388 275 113 PRE:CINCT 208 2 70 214 53 PRECINCT 209 252 178 12 - PRECINCT 2 10 276 197 75 PREC INCT 2 11 278 190 87 - PRECINCT 212 258 188 64 PKECINC.T 213 276 202 69 PREC INCT 2 14 464 326 136 PRECINCT 215 304 160 135 PREC INCT 216 315 195 105 PRECINCT 217 245 141 101 PRECINCT 218 300 159 133 PRECINCT 219 264 130 125 PRECINCT 220 378 2 10 161 PRECINCT 221 366 2J0 134 PREC INCT 222 231 177 48 PRECINCT 223 277 185 88 PRECINCT l.24 296 173 121 PRECINCT 225 233 162 64 PRECINCT 226 245 177 60 PRECINCT l.21 31~ 215 93 PRECINCT 228 342 231 93 PREC INCT 229 285 187 88 PRE:C.INCT 230 244 163 74 PRECINCT 231 252 173 73 PRECINCT 232 238 158 74 PRECINCT 233 284 185 95 PRECINCT 234 207 127 73 PRECINCT 235 258 146 103 PRECINCT 236 258 179 75 PRECINCT 237 253 165 8 1 PRtCINCT 238 341 255 85 PRt:CINCT 239 334 207 120 P~ECINCT 240 198 130 60 PRECINCT 241 97 52 43 PRECINCT 242 252 187 61 PRECINCT 243 113 59 46 PRECINCT 244 29 18 11 PRECINCT 245 417 279 134 PREC INCT 246 2 19 172 45 PRECINCT 247 381 276 101 PRECINCT 248 353 207 139 PRECINCT 249 313 208 103 PR EC INCT 250 318 246 69 PRECINCT 251 455 308 145 PRECINCT 252 418 266 147 PRECINCT 253 502 328 168 PRECINCT 254 253 159 88 PRECINCT 255 343 227 114 PRECINCT 2 56 304 214 88 - PRECINCT 257 141 67 69 PRECINCT 258 64 30 34 PRECINCT 259 252 158 87 PRt:C.INCT 260 299 163 129 PRcCINCT 261 323 200 120 PRECINCT 2.62 255 127 121 PRECINCT 263 190 87 100 PRECINCT 264 326 172 148 PRECINCT 265 260 158 89 PRECINCT 266 287 154 124 PRECINCT 267 78 41 37 TOTAL SUP DI ST 5 l 6966 l )959 691 STATEMENT OF All VuTES CAST AT THE GENE:RAL EltCTION NOVEMBE:R 3, 1970 PAul 72 COU~TY Mt A SURt: S C GN TI NUE:O GOLElA SCH . BO . ME:MBE:R i3Gl\O MEASURE T A B M p s w s s 0 L L c H T H "' M T v 0 A I u I J J A A I L L A s l.J u L R s p l R T H H A I I T 0 s s I v D N p N 0 0 E s T E c A y s E N T s 0 TOTAL SUP Ol~T l l 5223 TOTAL SUP DIST 2 ~ 0864 TOTAL SUP DIST 3 ~ 1027 3716 1 97'4 13428 l 07'4 12533 2183 TOTAL SUP CIST 4 9198 TOTAL SUP DIST 5 ) 6966 l J959 691 SUB TOTALS t 3278 3716 19 7'4 ~428 1 959 107.ii 12533 2183 )691 ABS ENT EE TOT Al S 3747 86 9t 69 269 4t: 7~ 60 lL5 GRAND TOTALS E 7025 3802 20 /2 13497 l . 228 111 ~ 2612 243 )816 Ozena Precinct 6 Ventura County 1: 234 10 . 826 . ' I STATEMENT OF All VOTES CA~T AT THE GENERAL ELECTION NOVcM~EK 3 , 197~ PAGE 13 SUPPLEMENT -- IrcMS Uf MAJUR 11\cTEREST. GOVERNOR , u. s. SENATOR , PROPOSITIONS l , 1 0 ANO 1 8 . T R u R s M T R s p p p p p p 0 E N 0 H u lJ I c R R R R R R T A R M f; R t'4 p H 0 0 c c u 0 A G u 0 A p N l E p p p p p p l A H R H E E E N E v y y R v R l l l l l l 0 0 0 B 8 T A E G A c I A R D p A R D A p f N y y s E E I I E E I I 0 5 t N E N T p M f I p M I F R T s 0 s 0 CARPINTER IA 1 876 771 16 775 12 374 132. 852 1 030 26 l 043 6 . 16 1 667 753 SANT A BARBARA ~ 7698 1 1365 183 l 12100 - 224 )250 l )7 75 l ) 710 l ~17 6 46'4 l 4481 3 15 1 ~201 l ) 4 20 l 3386 LOMPOC 6018 2 130 5 1 t2900 68 !56 2696 ~880 13 741 35 ~963 19 3814 2293 l551 SA~T A MAR IA 9753 13459 89 46 77 69 2633 t 5 l1 55e2 bOO~ 6 '4 4805 28 495 3112 2994 GUADALUPE 547 276 5 183 5 134 2. 13 Z51 24 7 5 342 2 12 161 175 GRANO TOTALS I. 5892 J 8001 34'4 2 0635 378 ~9 47 l ~933 l. )275 2 bl 9~ 59'4 2 t3 64 368 2 3943 l )653 l ~859 ' ' / STATE OF CALIFOIN!.A COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA 1. J. E. LEWIS, SEAi I ) CKHil'ICATE 01' COUNTY CLDK TO RESULT OF THE CANVASS or GENUAJ. EI.BCTION RETURNS \ ss. County Clerk of aaid Co\U'lty, do hereby certify that, in pursuance of the provisions of Section 1~401 of the Elections Code and of the resolution of the Board of Supervisors of aaid County. heretofore adopted and entered upon the minutes of aaid Board, I did canvass the returns of the vote cast in the 36th Assembly District in said County, at the General Election held on November 3, 1970, for elective public offices, and for and against each measure submitted to the vote of voters, and that the Statement of the Vote Cast, to which this certificate is attached, shows the whole number of votes cast in said Assembly District in said County and the whole number of votes caat for each candidate and for and against each measure in said Assembly District in said County and in each o f the respective precincts therein, and that the totals of the respective colnms and the totals as shown for each candidate and for and against each measure are full, t~ue and correct. 111 WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SF.AL THIS / 9 Chay of s, count 1970 I / November 23, 1970 As shown by said statement, the following are declared elected to the offices as designated for 4-year terms commencing January 4, 1971: Charles F. Catterlin, Supervisor, Second District . John W. Carpenter, Sheriff-Coroner . The following judiciary officers having duly filed their nomination papers for the June 2, 1970 Primary Election, and there being no opposition and no petitions filed for write-in either at the June 2, 1970 Primary or November 3, 1970 General Election, it is hereby declared by this Board that said judiciary officers be, and they are hereby, declared elected for six - ~e ar terms commencing the fourth day of January, 1971 : Judge of the Superior Court: Marion A. Smith John T. Rickard Floyd C. Dodson Arden T. Jensen Judge of the Justice Court: James L. Pattillo - Montecito-Carpinteria Terrill F. Cox - Lompoc This Board further declares the results of the two local propositions, as follows: Referendum of Santa Barbara County Ordinance No . 2084 (El Capitan) Proposed Civil Service Ordinance Yes 33, 883 No 46,915 Yes 43,319 No 26,561 In accordance with the Certificates of the County Clerk, the following school measures were consolidat ed on the General Election ballot, as follows: Declaration of results of Member of the Governing Board, Goleta Union School District Election - November 3, 1970 General Election: Member Henry Alvarado Jean W. Blois LaWDence L. McAlpine David T. Phillips Marvin H. Stuart Janice J . Whiston Votes Received 1116 3802 2612 2072 2243 3497 Declaration of Results of the Bond Proposition of the Santa Maria Joint Union High School District - November 3, 1970 General Election: Bond Proposition: Shall the Santa Maria Joint Union High School ' District be authorized to i ssue and sell bonds in the principal amount of $5,600,000.00 to bear interest at a rate not to exceed 7% per annum, for the purpose of providing funds for the following purposes: The building or purchasing of school buildings; the making of alterations or additions to the school building or buildings other than such as may be necessary for current maintenance, operation or repair; the supplying of school buildings and grounds with furniture, equipment or necessary apparatus of a permanent nature; the ~- 329-D Expression of Appreciation by Board to Participants in 3rd Annual Youth Govt. Conference. November 23, 1970 permanent improvement of the school grounds ; the demolition or razing of any school building with the i ntent to replace it with another school building whether in the same location or any other location; and the carrying out of the projects and purposes authorizedin 15811 of the State Education Code (sewers and drains)? Santa Barbara County Ozena Precinct, Ventura County Yes 11,228 Yes 6 No No 5, 816 10 Six precincts were manually counted and the results were found to be the same as the results tabulated by the votronics ballot counters and the IBM Corporation. Total Registration Total Vote Cast Percentage 113,762 87,025 76.5% In the Matter of Express ion of Appreciation on Behalf of the Board of Supervisors to Cormnittee, Department Heads and Personnel Participating in Third Annual Youth in Government Conference . Upon motion of Supervisor Tunnell, seconded by Supervisor Grant, and carried unanimously, it is ordered that the Clerk transmit a letter of appreciation, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors, to the committee, department heads including the Chairman, Clifford C. Romer, Chief Probation Officer, and other personnel who participated in the very successful third annual Youth in Govern- ment Conference held in Santa Barbara Monday and Tuesday, November 16-17, 1970. Also, a special thanks to the Santa Maria Barbecue Committee who came from Santa Maria to put on the bar becue for the students . ATTEST: , J Upon motion the Board adjourned sine die . The foregoing Minutes are hereby approved .